I can't recommend the book Ivan wrote on SSL and TLS. Bulletproof SSL and TLS gives a very good overview of how SSL and TLS operate, explains some of the attacks used against SSL/TLS, and gives some information on how to configure TLS.
I also find SSL labs to be a great tool to evaluate web sites of vendors and company hosted sites.
Using the import restricted versions of the 5.7 it will penetrate various types of body armor. That was one of the requirements for the Personal Defense Weapon (PDW) from the late 80's.
I had to double check since it has been about a year since I bought any 5.7x28mm for my PS90, but it is under $0.50 / round. Not that I'd suggest going with the FiveSeven, it is a very bulky handgun.
Very true when taken to the extreme, there is an absolute minimum thickness. But slimmer and thicker backstraps and grips can make a huge difference. I know Springfield offers interchangeable backstraps along with Glock and S&W, so it is very common these days.
I get that reading the article is too much for/. , but not even reading the summary, that is inexcusable. The summary makes it very clear that the method to accommodate different hands is to have adjustable grips. Change at most 3 parts and have a slimmer or thicker grip.
You have one really bad seller's agent if they don't have the solar system lease written into the contract. In reality the worst case scenario is a buyer won't agree and you wait for the next buyer. Given the current market, that won't take long.
Her intentions were all about her. The only thing you can trust Bill or Hillary on, is that whatever they say and/or do, is for themselves. In reality this is still an issue because of a bunch of brain washed liberals who refuse to believe that she is scum.
Over regulation is always bad. Regulation can be a very good thing. How can anyone do research if there is no regulation and car manufactures could just put out what ever safety information they wanted? Your research would show that every car was absolutely amazing, yet hitting a snow flake would destroy it. Never mistake over-regulation like what most liberals want with regulation.
Which is why when I took a Close Quarters Battle class from a retired Army special forces soldier, he taught us the Mogadishu drill. 2 to the chest, 1 to the head.
Calling it a.22 caliber leaves out quite a bit about the round. It is a small, high velocity round. It has only one thing in common with a.22LR round. That is the bullet diameter is the same. A.22LR weighs in between 30 and 40 grains with a velocity between about 1,200 fps and almost 1,800. A 5.56mm round weighs at least 55 grains with 62 grains being more common and has a velocity of around 3,000 fps.
The purpose of the M-16 was to increase the number of rounds that a solider could carry. It was also to reduce recoil and make the rifleman more accurate.
Which is why I prefer the term that I first heard from John Ringo, if I remember right. Social Justice Bully. These people aren't warriors in any sense and just want to throw their heft around and go after easy targets.
Actually I do expect my financial planner to not only manager my investments with more care than I would, but with more knowledge of investments then I have. I played that game for a year or so with my 401k, and in the end I get a higher rate of return by letting the managing company chose where my money is invested based off of some broad rules I set.
We get control through solid contracts, with limits of liability and indemnification and insurance. I'm sure there is some cost cutting, but the really cost savings is through scale, for the cloud providers.
About as far from the truth as you can get. This was about diversity, but it is about equal opportunities and not equal outcomes. The Hugo's have in recent memory picked based on the author's sex, sexual preface, and other attributes that are not related to the quality of the work. The Sad Puppies have pointed this out in a manner that only the most ideologues fail to understand. You are right that this is a debacle, and it is showing how little the Hugo's matter. When Toni Weisskopf gets more votes than any other editor in Hugo history, but is denied because a group of Social Justice Bullies bought supporting memberships and urged people to vote No Award, this shows how bad the clique at WorldCon is.
First off Larry wasn't an organizer of Sad Puppies 3, second it was people like Mary Robinette Kowal and John Scalzi that urged the destruction of the Hugo's. People learned that the Social Justice Bullies were playing in a tiny sandbox and using the reputation of the Hugo to nominate works based not on the quality, but if it was a "good message", bonus points if the SJB's could tie in a minority author. Mary went so far as to organize mass buys of supporting memberships for people who couldn't afford it, with the "wink wink" that they would vote No Award for anything Sad Puppy related. Mary and her ilk were happy to light a match and drop it at their gasoline soaked feet. All Larry has done is expose the hypocrisies of the "trufans".
Actually they proved that the Social Justice Bullies are a highly exclusionary group. It wasn't about politics for the Sad Puppies, it was about good books. The slate wasn't picked based on the author's skin color, or politics. It was based on if the organizers of Sad Puppies 3 liked the book. The backlash from the SJB's was to burn the house down around them and award a record number of No Awards, with multiple loud mouths for the SJB's calling and even organizing mass buys of memberships for the sole purpose of No Award.
Where was the cheating? Even George RR Martin admits that the Sad Puppies did everything within the rules. The issue here is a clique of Social Justice Bullies have taken over the Hugo's and it was exposed over the last 3 Sad Puppy campaigns. Now we see that the SJB's will burn the house down around them to prove that they are a clique and hostile to fans that aren't "trufans".
Seriously have you not read anything on the Tor editor blog called Making Light, or the numerous hit pieces by the media? Every attempt has been made to call Sad Puppies a conservative, misogynistic, and just plain evil group. If that isn't politics at its worst then I'd love to hear your definition of politics.
How about you ask the militants in Iraq and Afghanistan. Small arms can and have been used successfully in guerrilla campaigns. Heck go ask the Vietnamese how well the tanks, B-52 bombers, F4 Phantoms did in the 50's through 70's.
First off, from a Federal point of view, full auto firearms are legal. It is only some States that don't respect the 2nd Amendment that make it illegal to own them. The biggest problem with full auto firearms is that no new full auto firearms are allowed to be transferred to civilians since the mid 80's. This means that it is very expensive to buy one of the firearms that is transferable, it isn't uncommon to see a M16 sell for $20,000. The process to take ownership isn't all that bad. Fill out the Form 4 or might be Form 1, I don't remember off the top of my head. Get your local Sheriff to sign off on the paperwork and get fingerprinted. Send the forms to the ATF along with a $200 check. Then wait for the ATF to approve, which they routinely do. Then you can take ownership of the full auto weapon. I've done the process for a short barreled rifle, but haven't had the money to do an automatic.
As far as what should be legal, I'd say any single man portable firearm fits the definition of the 2nd Amendment. Which would exclude grenade launchers, missiles, but would include things like M4 rifles.
The 2nd Amendment doesn't need to be redefined to include self-defense. It serves a variety of purposes and only gun banners have tried to pigeon hole the meaning. It covers self-defense capabilities from criminals, self-defense capabilities from government, sporting purposes, and hunting.
The only line that has been crossed with the 2nd Amendment is by groups like the Brady bunch, Bloomberg and other vocal gun banners.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, simple typo that no one can fix in the year 2015. The book is excellent.
I also find SSL labs to be a great tool to evaluate web sites of vendors and company hosted sites.
Using the import restricted versions of the 5.7 it will penetrate various types of body armor. That was one of the requirements for the Personal Defense Weapon (PDW) from the late 80's.
I had to double check since it has been about a year since I bought any 5.7x28mm for my PS90, but it is under $0.50 / round. Not that I'd suggest going with the FiveSeven, it is a very bulky handgun.
Very true when taken to the extreme, there is an absolute minimum thickness. But slimmer and thicker backstraps and grips can make a huge difference. I know Springfield offers interchangeable backstraps along with Glock and S&W, so it is very common these days.
I'll be sure to tell that to all the manufactures who already have changeable grip sizes available.
I get that reading the article is too much for /. , but not even reading the summary, that is inexcusable. The summary makes it very clear that the method to accommodate different hands is to have adjustable grips. Change at most 3 parts and have a slimmer or thicker grip.
You have one really bad seller's agent if they don't have the solar system lease written into the contract. In reality the worst case scenario is a buyer won't agree and you wait for the next buyer. Given the current market, that won't take long.
Her intentions were all about her. The only thing you can trust Bill or Hillary on, is that whatever they say and/or do, is for themselves. In reality this is still an issue because of a bunch of brain washed liberals who refuse to believe that she is scum.
Over regulation is always bad. Regulation can be a very good thing. How can anyone do research if there is no regulation and car manufactures could just put out what ever safety information they wanted? Your research would show that every car was absolutely amazing, yet hitting a snow flake would destroy it. Never mistake over-regulation like what most liberals want with regulation.
Which is why when I took a Close Quarters Battle class from a retired Army special forces soldier, he taught us the Mogadishu drill. 2 to the chest, 1 to the head.
The purpose of the M-16 was to increase the number of rounds that a solider could carry. It was also to reduce recoil and make the rifleman more accurate.
Well with the men it is pretty much all about depth.
Which is why I prefer the term that I first heard from John Ringo, if I remember right. Social Justice Bully. These people aren't warriors in any sense and just want to throw their heft around and go after easy targets.
We get control through solid contracts, with limits of liability and indemnification and insurance. I'm sure there is some cost cutting, but the really cost savings is through scale, for the cloud providers.
Now you've done it. You are going to incur the wrath of the Social Justice Bullies! You dare to bring truth and reason into gamergate?
Amazes me that there are still people who think gamergate was about harassment. Do your research, discover what really happened.
I did sign up and I did vote. It is bullying if you are outright organizing buying of voting rights for your supporters.
About as far from the truth as you can get. This was about diversity, but it is about equal opportunities and not equal outcomes. The Hugo's have in recent memory picked based on the author's sex, sexual preface, and other attributes that are not related to the quality of the work. The Sad Puppies have pointed this out in a manner that only the most ideologues fail to understand. You are right that this is a debacle, and it is showing how little the Hugo's matter. When Toni Weisskopf gets more votes than any other editor in Hugo history, but is denied because a group of Social Justice Bullies bought supporting memberships and urged people to vote No Award, this shows how bad the clique at WorldCon is.
First off Larry wasn't an organizer of Sad Puppies 3, second it was people like Mary Robinette Kowal and John Scalzi that urged the destruction of the Hugo's. People learned that the Social Justice Bullies were playing in a tiny sandbox and using the reputation of the Hugo to nominate works based not on the quality, but if it was a "good message", bonus points if the SJB's could tie in a minority author. Mary went so far as to organize mass buys of supporting memberships for people who couldn't afford it, with the "wink wink" that they would vote No Award for anything Sad Puppy related. Mary and her ilk were happy to light a match and drop it at their gasoline soaked feet. All Larry has done is expose the hypocrisies of the "trufans".
Actually they proved that the Social Justice Bullies are a highly exclusionary group. It wasn't about politics for the Sad Puppies, it was about good books. The slate wasn't picked based on the author's skin color, or politics. It was based on if the organizers of Sad Puppies 3 liked the book. The backlash from the SJB's was to burn the house down around them and award a record number of No Awards, with multiple loud mouths for the SJB's calling and even organizing mass buys of memberships for the sole purpose of No Award.
Where was the cheating? Even George RR Martin admits that the Sad Puppies did everything within the rules. The issue here is a clique of Social Justice Bullies have taken over the Hugo's and it was exposed over the last 3 Sad Puppy campaigns. Now we see that the SJB's will burn the house down around them to prove that they are a clique and hostile to fans that aren't "trufans".
Seriously have you not read anything on the Tor editor blog called Making Light, or the numerous hit pieces by the media? Every attempt has been made to call Sad Puppies a conservative, misogynistic, and just plain evil group. If that isn't politics at its worst then I'd love to hear your definition of politics.
How about you ask the militants in Iraq and Afghanistan. Small arms can and have been used successfully in guerrilla campaigns. Heck go ask the Vietnamese how well the tanks, B-52 bombers, F4 Phantoms did in the 50's through 70's.
As far as what should be legal, I'd say any single man portable firearm fits the definition of the 2nd Amendment. Which would exclude grenade launchers, missiles, but would include things like M4 rifles.
The 2nd Amendment doesn't need to be redefined to include self-defense. It serves a variety of purposes and only gun banners have tried to pigeon hole the meaning. It covers self-defense capabilities from criminals, self-defense capabilities from government, sporting purposes, and hunting.
The only line that has been crossed with the 2nd Amendment is by groups like the Brady bunch, Bloomberg and other vocal gun banners.