Proof? I'm still waiting for the explanation as to how the hacks and leaks have been tied to the Russians. To date, this is all still conjecture and/or assertion without any credible presentation of evidence to back it up. Until I see it, I'll just [safely] assume this is an act of desperation by team Clinton to try to tie Trump to the Ruskies. Pathetic, weak diversion.
You're just making shit up. The problem for you is, her narrative has been that she didn't know any of it was classified -- the "I was too stupid" defense.
Hillary is not a Republican. She's Democrat. I don't know what you're thinking.
"I was under sniper fire in Bosnia."
"None of the emails on my server were classified."
"Americans were killed and dragged through the streets of Benghazi because of a youtube video."
Just a few off the top of my head, without googling. There are many, many more. But, of course, you already know this. Lying comes naturally to Hillary. Lucky for her, she's got delusional shills like you that are willing to play damage control.
No, I'm telling him to substantiate the claims he makes. If he doesn't, his claims are invalid and he may as well not even make them. There's a difference between disagreement with speech and saying GTFO, and legislated policy against speech which results in imprisonment.
I don't think assholes like that should be able to vote. If you've been proven to be a detriment to society, why should you be able to affect the election of its policy makers?
DMCA: Copyright law (as crappy as the DMCA is) has little to do with freedom of speech. Are you somehow equating P2P file sharing of copyrighted material as speech? Something else?
Patriot act: Yeah, another crappy situation. But, you're gonna have to explain what this has to do with free speech.
Hate Speech: Is there an actual law that restricts hate speech? If so, you win. But, as far as I know, only SJWs enforce hate speech restriction.
incitement, defamation laws, Obscenity laws, fighting words excemption, regulated airwaves, Texas, a few examples, the list is a lot lot longer
You're right -- many of these are ridiculous. But, the onus is on you to show how the US is more restrictive than "just about any other western country on earth". I don't see it.
Hell yes! As we repeatedly see on college campuses (campi?), hate speech is defined as anything that SJWs disagree with. If you disagree with that definition, please offer one of your own and we'll evaluate the need for "stopping" it together.
but you're saying the Brexit was more than economical issues then?
Anyone who thinks the motivation was solely economic is dreadfully un-newsed. Absolutely -- the popularity of the Brexit stems largely from the same issues that have propelled Trump to the forefront: Hillary represents globalism and the same kind of inorganic, forced culture change (or abandonment) that Obama advocated before the UN yesterday. Trump, however, is riding the wave of preservation of national sovereignty.
Entirely plausible. Anyone who's been to Shanghai knows China doesn't care about pollution. And, from past actions, we also know China doesn't care about space junk.
So, he has to take the time to find the specific email so that you can be educated? Why don't you put a little effort into educating yourself? That is, if you actually want to be educated.
Slashdot Mirror
Proof? I'm still waiting for the explanation as to how the hacks and leaks have been tied to the Russians. To date, this is all still conjecture and/or assertion without any credible presentation of evidence to back it up. Until I see it, I'll just [safely] assume this is an act of desperation by team Clinton to try to tie Trump to the Ruskies. Pathetic, weak diversion.
Lax interns?... Oh, you must be thinking of Bill Clinton.
You're just making shit up. The problem for you is, her narrative has been that she didn't know any of it was classified -- the "I was too stupid" defense.
Did Newsweek publish any other stories that day (or that week)? Is there a definite correlation between that publishing of that story and the DDOS?
Maybe so, but that's only because I've voluntarily donated 40% more to my favorite private tracker.
If you want to look like a free thinking intellect, the last thing you ought to do is adopt Hillary's stupid, spoon-fed colloquialisms.
BTW, ALT-RIGHT moves you FORWARD in your browser. Kinda funny, huh?
Hillary is not a Republican. She's Democrat. I don't know what you're thinking.
"I was under sniper fire in Bosnia."
"None of the emails on my server were classified."
"Americans were killed and dragged through the streets of Benghazi because of a youtube video."
Just a few off the top of my head, without googling. There are many, many more. But, of course, you already know this. Lying comes naturally to Hillary. Lucky for her, she's got delusional shills like you that are willing to play damage control.
Attempting to affect public opinion through comical posts is worse than bribing public officials? I don't think you know what you're saying.
No, I'm telling him to substantiate the claims he makes. If he doesn't, his claims are invalid and he may as well not even make them. There's a difference between disagreement with speech and saying GTFO, and legislated policy against speech which results in imprisonment.
I don't think assholes like that should be able to vote. If you've been proven to be a detriment to society, why should you be able to affect the election of its policy makers?
The discussion was about restricting free speech. As interesting as your oration was to read, I think you lost sight of that.
Patriot act: Yeah, another crappy situation. But, you're gonna have to explain what this has to do with free speech.
Hate Speech: Is there an actual law that restricts hate speech? If so, you win. But, as far as I know, only SJWs enforce hate speech restriction.
You're right -- many of these are ridiculous. But, the onus is on you to show how the US is more restrictive than "just about any other western country on earth". I don't see it.
Hell yes! As we repeatedly see on college campuses (campi?), hate speech is defined as anything that SJWs disagree with. If you disagree with that definition, please offer one of your own and we'll evaluate the need for "stopping" it together.
Back that shit up with factual examples, or get the fuck out.
Yep. Given Microsoft's history, any and all conspiracy theories are well founded. They're assholes.
*cough* I've not nothing. I'm done.
But, in this case, they've needlessly (and probably maliciously) gone out of their way to make the minority unwelcome.
The rapes have occurred in Germany, France and England. I'd provide links, but it's just so easy to google "Muslim rape gangs UK" and get results.
Anyone who thinks the motivation was solely economic is dreadfully un-newsed. Absolutely -- the popularity of the Brexit stems largely from the same issues that have propelled Trump to the forefront: Hillary represents globalism and the same kind of inorganic, forced culture change (or abandonment) that Obama advocated before the UN yesterday. Trump, however, is riding the wave of preservation of national sovereignty.
Entirely plausible. Anyone who's been to Shanghai knows China doesn't care about pollution. And, from past actions, we also know China doesn't care about space junk.
Shut up
Up there!
In the Sky!
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
No, it's E. Coli!
Presumably, the same could also be said of Saudi Arabia and China.
So, he has to take the time to find the specific email so that you can be educated? Why don't you put a little effort into educating yourself? That is, if you actually want to be educated.
So, liberals like to pay premium prices for mediocre frozen desserts?