I like buggy code and I cannot lie.
You other hackers can't deny
When a geek walks in with a laptop briefcase
And Knoppix-STD in yo face
You get sprung
Wanna boot it up quick cuz you know BSoD's suck
Look at the theme Gnome's wearin'
I'm hooked and I can't stop starin' oh Tuxy
I wanna get with ya
And take yo picture
My MCSE tried to warn me
But them hackin' tools make me so horny. . .
Be forewarned though, knoppix toram takes a LONG time to load, even on fast drives. But if you plan on keeping the system up for a long time and not rebooting, feel free to do it. Something about having an entire operating system complete with programs loaded into RAM just smacks of hotness.
Yes, we do it at UF. In fact, we've got both wireless AND wired redirects for authenticating users before they're allowed to access the network. And this is nothing new. . .
That's ridiculous that they can patent such a thing. We have multiple systems at UF similar to that except that we just have users register/login in order to get access.
How the hades do you patent a no-brainer concept for making sure only people that are supposed to use your network are allowed to do so?
My point is that he's saying that there should be an entirely new release because of a few buggy packages that seem not to work on the amd64 arch. Thus, even if he concluded that it's super duper usable, warm, fuzzy, slices, dices, and makes julian fries, I still believe he's full of crap for suggesting that there should be a new release because he can't get his brand-spanking-new architecture to work like a dream on two or three packages.
Too bad you can't mod the article down. This guy was testing primarily on the amd64. Gimme a break. Of course it's gonna have major bug issues. It's not even fully supported (and has major bugs) in any of the Linux distros (yes, even my beloved Gentoo). Had he used the i386 on a stock x86 processor I might give him some credibility.
Folding@Home for your brain, using up that idle processing time.:)
Now if only I could figure out a way to install Folding@Home on my brain, it'd keep me warm even if I was butt naked in a snow storm.:D
Of course, version 4 breaks VPN, so you'd have to turn it off if you want to work from home, login to your university's wireless network, etc.
But, such a thing still exists to the end of making sure that one vulnerability in a program doesn't affect other programs. It's called jails. It's implemented in the FreeBSD kernel and it means that if, for example, I compromise your webserver's http service, I have only compromised the http service and can't go mucking around with your email program.
Where is it? I've got a netgear router and I never got a link to the source. :)
Isn't this the purpose of things like BitTorrent though?
Congress talking about privacy is like NAMBLA talking about protecting children.
That was a piss poor article!
Step 3? Why it's ??? of course! And you forgot Step 4: PROFIT!
No, if it was funded by Apple it would be called iDoom. ;)
this proofs MyDoom was initialy spread by organised crime. . .
:-P
I think it "proofs" that the editors don't proofread the submissions.
I like buggy code and I cannot lie. You other hackers can't deny When a geek walks in with a laptop briefcase And Knoppix-STD in yo face You get sprung Wanna boot it up quick cuz you know BSoD's suck Look at the theme Gnome's wearin' I'm hooked and I can't stop starin' oh Tuxy I wanna get with ya And take yo picture My MCSE tried to warn me But them hackin' tools make me so horny. . .
The Apollo 1 ride? God that was tasteless. LOL
Be forewarned though, knoppix toram takes a LONG time to load, even on fast drives. But if you plan on keeping the system up for a long time and not rebooting, feel free to do it. Something about having an entire operating system complete with programs loaded into RAM just smacks of hotness.
Too bad it spits out a 403 error when I try to download it. . .
http://kernel.org ;)
Screw. . . Beaver. . . Ah ha! So that's where it goes!
If it's Microsoft we're talking about, you always screw the little guy. ;)
Yes, we do it at UF. In fact, we've got both wireless AND wired redirects for authenticating users before they're allowed to access the network. And this is nothing new. . .
That's ridiculous that they can patent such a thing. We have multiple systems at UF similar to that except that we just have users register/login in order to get access. How the hades do you patent a no-brainer concept for making sure only people that are supposed to use your network are allowed to do so?
My point is that he's saying that there should be an entirely new release because of a few buggy packages that seem not to work on the amd64 arch. Thus, even if he concluded that it's super duper usable, warm, fuzzy, slices, dices, and makes julian fries, I still believe he's full of crap for suggesting that there should be a new release because he can't get his brand-spanking-new architecture to work like a dream on two or three packages.
Too bad you can't mod the article down. This guy was testing primarily on the amd64. Gimme a break. Of course it's gonna have major bug issues. It's not even fully supported (and has major bugs) in any of the Linux distros (yes, even my beloved Gentoo). Had he used the i386 on a stock x86 processor I might give him some credibility.
Folding@Home for your brain, using up that idle processing time. :)
Now if only I could figure out a way to install Folding@Home on my brain, it'd keep me warm even if I was butt naked in a snow storm. :D
Of course, version 4 breaks VPN, so you'd have to turn it off if you want to work from home, login to your university's wireless network, etc. But, such a thing still exists to the end of making sure that one vulnerability in a program doesn't affect other programs. It's called jails. It's implemented in the FreeBSD kernel and it means that if, for example, I compromise your webserver's http service, I have only compromised the http service and can't go mucking around with your email program.
What about places like whitehouse.com? Where do they fit in?
Because if you're using Linux it won't matter anyway, and if you use Windoze, you just hold down the shift key. ;)
It was a joke, dude. ;)
How the hell am I supposed to plug an IDE cable into that thing?!