Slashdot Mirror


Last Great Internet Bubble Auction

jlouderb writes "At least that's what they are calling it. Cowan Alexander is getting ready to auction off the assets of MP3.com (now owned by CNet) on March 10th and 11th. The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular, along with servers and notebooks that are probably hopelessly out of date. The best part, though -- a 1997 yellow hummer and a 1994 "Fat Boy" Harley. Plus, they've got pictures!"

432 comments

  1. the MP3.COM database.. by Joceyln+Parfitt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Too bad they aren't selling the mp3 database itself! All those songs, lost.. there should be a law or something.

    Although that Axis Systems (now part of Verisity Design) machine looks pretty nice. Hm, $1M initial price.. I wonder for how much it'll go now. We could use one at work for various things.

    1. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by glen604 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      well, since they are selling the servers, maybe some enterprising person could do some data recovery on them and bring some of it back?

      i suppose this would be of questionable legality, but say you got permission from the original music creators- then what?

    2. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. I wonder why mp3.com isn't selling the songs.. maybe it's because the ARTISTS OWN THEIR SONGS, not mp3.com? Or wait, do you want the recording industry to pwn everything the artists produce?

    3. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why should they.. they can like.. umm... sell it as elevator muzak?

      see earlier slashdot articles on it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're hardly lost ... they're about to become everyone's new favorite Elevator Muzak.

    5. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      i suppose this would be of questionable legality, but say you got permission from the original music creators- then what?

      Would this even be illegal? If I sell you my old paper journal that I wrote in with ball-point pen (after ripping out the pages I've used) and neglect to rip out the first few blank pages and you color them in with a pencil and recover my private thoughts is that your fault or mine?

      Likewise, unless you sign some sort of "I won't try to recover data from this device" agreement, how would it be illegal? Even then it would be civil -- not criminal.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Too bad they aren't selling the mp3 database itself! All those songs, lost.. there should be a law or something.

      Are they actually gone forever? Are the new owners going to delete the database? I know when my agency acquires another company I convert all of their data to be compatible with our system -- but I don't destroy or delete the original data. Even if we no longer need it.

      DVD-Rs/tapes and hard drive space is cheap. Why would you delete anything?

      Maybe we'll see it reappear a few years from now. Doubtful but you never know.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, since mp3.com never paid my band money they owe us, I say you have my permission to rip us off too. Not that anyone cared -- they're on the site for free -- but since mp3 said they owed us money, the weasels should've paid it.

    8. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Bohnanza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you think the folks who submitted songs kept copies for themselves? I did.

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    9. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah, but you kinda get used to having it there as a backup, like your songs would *always* be there on mp3.com, no need to keep them on your drive (need to make room for paris hilton full you know!)

      I for one had to do a mad scramble to download and archive all my stuff off of mp3.com

      I also got screwed out of like 20 bucks from them which I email bickered with them for 2 years over (on principle). Both mp3.com and cnet get two thumbs down, booing AND hissing.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    10. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      They answered your mail? I sent them email for 2 years over a similar amount and the weasels never answered. Although for the first year it was an automated "we'll respond within 5 to 10 business days".

    11. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by CKW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > All those songs, lost

      They are not "lost".

      a) Thousands of people have hundreds if not thousands of copies (heck I downloaded 600 MB of songs from them the day before they turned it off, that's 0.5 percent of everything they have right there),

      b) The original artists still have their own copies and can go on to do what they want with them, case in point - G.O.T.E. (at one point a couple of these songs broke the top 10 on the Trance chart on mp3.com).

    12. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mp3.com user agreement in short stated that you gave up all your rights to the media and they owned it.

    13. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be an awesome loophole.

      "I'm not copying music. I'm undeleting it."

    14. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it would be illegal to distribute that music without permission from the copy-right holders

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    15. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't selling the MP3 database, but for a hefty sum they will let you "message" their old artists by the thousands.

    16. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by basil+montreal · · Score: 1

      There is a whole market of companies who buy and sell excess bubble gear. Usually, the only way you can get anything from a big blow-out like this or a large corporate upgrade's leftovers is by promising to either "de-manufacture" the hard drives or format them 6 times each. One of my clients is going to be selling 6000 old computers for a large cell phone manufacturer and he had to contract this massive ultra-format of their hard drives out to another company just so he could sell the non-storage parts on Powersource...

      Companies are very aware of data left over, but someone told me that there is always a way to get the data back, no matter what happened to the drive (excluding melting I suppose...)

    17. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      All those songs, lost.. there should be a law or something.

      As a contributor to MP3.com allow me to assure you that the actual situation is far worse.

      The new owner of their assets owns the same rights to their songs as I chose to grant MP3.com. However, they have removed my ability to manage those rights. If I don't want them to have the ability to broadcast my music as part of muzak (the business opportunity that makes this catalog profitable to them), I can submit my name and password to mp3.com to them. If I happen to guess my username and password right; yes that's right, they don't check when you type it in; then they say they'll remove my music from their list.

      But I will never get a confirmation either way.

      So I went through and entered every email address I've ever used and the 8-10 best guess passwords. Took me 3 hours. Hopefully this sleezeball company won't sell my music now.

      And I really wish there was a law or something.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    18. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > you color them in with a pencil and recover my private thoughts is that your fault or mine?

      Your fault... err, the writer's fault. I'm sure there is nothing illegal with recovering files from a PC you own, but if you tried distributing any of that, you'll be in trouble. Or taking advantage of the info somehow, like copying the code from their site and using it yourself, etc.

      I would be very surprised, however, if they did not completely wipe these drives, including zeroing out all bits on the drive first, low-levelling it, or something similar.

    19. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I really wish there was a law

      Well, unless you gave MP3.com exclusive ownership of the songs, there is a law. Copyright laws. Sure, the new owner could still play your song somewhere you'll never hear it, but they could still do that no matter how many laws are passed.

    20. Re:the MP3.COM database.. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you gave MP3.com exclusive ownership of the songs, there is a law. Copyright laws. Sure, the new owner could still play your song somewhere you'll never hear it, but they could still do that no matter how many laws are passed.

      I did not give them exclusive ownership. Technically I'm covered by the law. But lets be honest, if they decide to go against my wishes and play my songs in rented out muzak, what are my chances of finding out? Especially since they didn't send any confirmation that they received my cancellation request, and could simply claim that I made no such request?

      I originally signed up for my songs to be licensed through MP3.com and managed by me in their web admin tool. I believe that by removing the web admin features, the agreement has fundamentally changed...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  2. Those Dumb Chairs by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Internet Bubble

    It seemed to me that MP3 went due to the lawsuits and harrassment from RIAA, not because they had a particularly flawed business model (aside from the music sharing thing), though a Hummer, Harley, Pool table and other junk does suggest an overeagerness to burn through capital.

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs

    I'd still like to get one of those, but with the price of shipping and gas being what it is, I'm better off looking for one around where I live. I could certainly use a new laptop, but there's piles of those around for cheep.

    I've tried the Aeron chair out and it seemed like a decent chair, are they not all they appear?

    I had one of those swedish (or whatever they were) chairs you kneel in and found my upper back became very sore, so that didn't last.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by ThrasherTT · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Aerons are quite nice, especially if you get the "fully featured" ones. I used one for about a year at one job, and now even 4 years later, I still long for an Aeron. It's not like they're going to massage you while you sit there, but they are quite comfortable, and since the "fabric" has lots of holes in it, they keep you cooler than a standard chair does.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    2. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Here+I+Stand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      are they not all they appear?

      i used one for 3 or 4 years and it was very comfy indeed. i think the rap that they sometimes get has to do with the idea of paying so much for a chair or possibly envy on the part of commentators who had the misfortune to work for companies with more utilitarian views of office furniture.

    3. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by raygundan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I got one the way everybody else who has one at home did-- I waited for an auction, and bought one for 1/4 price. Check ebay, too.

      Well worth it-- but you *have* to spend the time to adjust it to make it work for you. They don't feel much different when you're just sitting in it-- you notice the difference at the end of the day when you're not sore from sitting in a chair. But everybody's different, and I'm sure as many people dislike them as like them, even after adjustment and extended use.

    4. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Aeron's are VERY nice to work in.

      But pricy. I wouldn't buy one for my house, but I steal one of my coworkers all the time.

      He steals it back. (No, it isn't a dotcom, we just happen to have a couple of them floating around our engineering group.)

    5. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      There's nothing dumb about an Aeron chair unless your boss won't buy you one or you can't afford it. I bought myself one (yes, $750 worth) and never regretted it.

    6. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by justMichael · · Score: 1

      They are nice, not sure they are worth the price though.

      Just a tip, if you get one, don't keep your wallet in your back pocket when you are sitting in it. The mesh that they use is like a cheese grater and you will wear holes in your pants failry quickly.

      Maybe it's just me though, I tend to fidget a bit. Now where is my coffee cup??

    7. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by mbadolato · · Score: 5, Funny

      and since the "fabric" has lots of holes in it, they keep you cooler than a standard chair does.

      They also dissipate farts quite nicely! What fun are they if you can't share them with your coworkers ? :)

    8. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      1/4 of the price, eh? That's pretty lucky! The best I've seen/heard at local (Washington, D.C.) auctions has been around 1/2 retail price.

      You have a good point on the adjustments. At the same job, several people were less-than-thrilled with the Aerons, and I suspect that they either didn't sit in them enough (non-coders), or didn't take the time to set the chair up correctly for their body/posture.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    9. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by nosilA · · Score: 1

      I've been "fortunate" enough to have an aeron at several workplaces, although admittedly I've never been properly fitted for one. I find it to be a very mediocre chair that is incredibly difficult to adjust. I have worse backaches than I did in college, despite having an excellent bed and not carrying around a 50 pound backpack. I think the chairs in the conference rooms here (which aren't cheap, but are cheaper) are better chairs than the Aeron at my desk. My favorite chair is the one I have at home, which I bought for under $200.

      I would much rather sit in a chair that cost half as much and get a better monitor, but for some reason my employer believes that a "better" chair is more important than a better monitor.

      -Alison

    10. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The kneeling chairs take a bit of getting used to. You have to adjust your position to the desk a bit, they aren't just a "drop in" replacement for a standard chair.

      They also take a bit of time to build up the necessary muscular structure. People who sit in standard chairs have woefully underdeveloped trunk muscles, since the chair is explicitly designed to use as few muscles as possible, as seldom as possible.

      It becomes a feedback cycle. The more you use a standard chair, the more you need one.

      If you're willing to adapt your desk to the chair, rather than the other way around, a simple and common Japanese meditation bench will replace the sort of kneeling chair you are talking about. The trick for comfort with these is to place the bench on a zabuton, not directly on a hard floor.

      What I like to use though is a simple platform, about 30"x36" on which one can sit crosslegged, move around, change postion constantly, etc. These can be built at normal chair hight for use with a standard desk.

      Once you get used to these and build up a certain amount of supporting musculature you'll be loath to every go back to a standard chair. No matter how "ergonomic" a chair is it just isn't designed to hold a person in a position for which human body was designed. The old Greek and Roman benches on which one relined were far more suitable for human use.

      Good luck getting one into your office though.

      KFG

    11. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by shystershep · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is both a blessing and a curse. I agree that it is nice to share, but at the same time it is nice to let one slip quietly, which is much more difficult without the padding of a regular seat.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    12. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but then you will need a flatulence filter, you wouldn't want to suffocate.

    13. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by drmike0099 · · Score: 1

      "those dumb chairs" is a pretty ignorant comment by the poster. They won about every industrial design award when they came out, including the top industrial design award around (whatever it's called, I'm not in industrial design myself). They're not just fancy, they're considered to be ergonomic masterpieces...

    14. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Funny

      The kneeling chairs take a bit of getting used to.

      Plus, they make you look goofy, cement your reputation as a flake, and cause people to laugh at you behind your back.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    15. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I find it to be a very mediocre chair that is incredibly difficult to adjust.

      I agree.

      We all got Aerons a few years ago at work, and I really wish I could exchange it for the nicely padded non-price-gouging office chair I had previously.

      I don't think the Aeron is a *bad* chair, it's just not the Divine Throne that some people make it out to be. It's not even really superior to regular desk chairs, IMO.

      At this point, I think people worship the name more than anything else. I've run across some who turn into puddles of ji^Hoy over the hideous plywood chairs that Herman Miller makes too.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    16. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of which says a good deal more about them than about you.

      Perhaps one might develop some intestinal fortitude along with the intestinal physical support.

      KFG

    17. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they won those awards because they look really cool. not because of comfort.

    18. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      All of which says a good deal more about them than about you.

      No doubt. Most people are shallow, mindless, slack jawed, drooling sheep whose only reason for behaving in a manner anywhere approaching civilized is for fear of pain. Sad that we have to live with the unthinking. But the fact of the matter is, we do, we are as a race not that far from the apes, and if all it takes is to sit in a normal chair to avoid a Wrath of the Yahoos, well, then, call me spineless but never goofy.

      I am of the belief that there is value in style, refinement and nobility, and those chairs just suck it all one and replaces it with a pervasive air of goofiness.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    19. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've tried the Aeron chair out and it seemed like a decent chair, are they not all they appear?
      Officially, the Aeron is an "ergonmic" chair. That means that all the chair's parameters can be set to precisely match the user's physical needs.

      Problem: as an ergonomic chair, the Aeron is a piece of kaka. It's expensive because they put a lot of money into a kewl physical design and high-tech materials. But the adjustable parts don't adjust easily, and tend to wear out quickly. At one job, I had an old Aeron where the lumbar support was so worn, it wouldn't stay on the chair! I think you're supposed to replace parts of it as they wear out, but of course nobody does.

      Frankly, I think it's all marketing. When the Aeron was developed, people were just beginning to realize that computers meant RSI and other ergonomic issues. HermanMiller wanted to tap into that, but they decided branding and kewlness counted for more than actual ergonomics. Judging from the continued popularity of this pseudo-ergonomic beast, they were completely right.

      When I worked at the Java division of Sun, the standard chair was this very ordinary-looking but extremely functional ergonomic task chair. (I'm not certain, but I think it was a Global Granada.) Everything on that beast was adjustable -- you could even tilt it forward so you could squint at your screen without straining your back. That is a real ergonomic chair -- one that's designed to be used, not as a prop in a movie.

    20. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by kfg · · Score: 1

      So I take it your not interested in my recommendation for wearing robes, dashiki and dhoti?

      KFG

    21. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think you are missing the point.

      The traditional office chair (the ones what have some modicum of stuffing anyways) are fart batteries! So the day after chili you switch chairs as soon as the guy in the cubicle next to you goes for a coffee or whatever. Shit yourself to your hearts content and switch chairs back. As soon as your victim sits down the fart potential stored in the battery becomes a kinetic fart wafting up to your victims nose. A whoopee cushion gone bad!

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
    22. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am inspired. Please post a picture!

    23. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by winse · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's not how i got one ... I just waited for the next round of layoffs, and took one from the corner office.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    24. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm sitting in one of those dumb chairs right now. I hate them so much, I actually spent $800 beans on one for use at home. My back was all f#cked up prior to trying one of these awful chairs out and as soon as I sat in it, I could tell right away I simply hated it. ;)

      Seriously, my back has never felt better after sitting for 8 hours straight. Only b#tch I got is the fabric is somewhat slippery so I douse it with gluestick before parking my a$$ in it every morning.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    25. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      That Cheeky Dashiki may win points with the Pastor,
      But those tube socks with weejuns?
      The ensemble: disaster!

    26. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with you. After having used the Aeron for well over a year I didn't really think it was anything special. I do however love the Human Scale Freedom chair I've been using for the last two years. Other than needing to replace the vinyl arm rests for some cloth ones it has remained in excellent condition and is the most comfortable chair I've ever used.

      my model

    27. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps one might develop some intestinal fortitude along with the intestinal physical support.

      Indeed, thanks to a strict vegan diet, I have the power of nine men! After morning meditation and a three-bean salad, I could chop a bus in half!

      /Reed Tucker
    28. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, ah, I already bought the nice monitor (20" LCD :-)

    29. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "When the Aeron was developed, people were just beginning to realize that computers meant RSI and other ergonomic issues. HermanMiller wanted to tap into that"

      Talking of which, is it possible to get a DVORAK keyboard (in the UK) from anyone without an ass-full of pseudo-medical crap on their website and a price-tag designed for insurance companies and blackmailed employers?

    30. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only functioning imaging device I have right now is my scanner. Kinda hard to hold a chair up to.

      But here are some commercially available options:

      Seating platforms

      They're terribly expensive though, and if you're the least bit handy with a saw and electric drill you can make your own experimental models out of little more than some scrounged MDF/Plywood and 2x4. Play with different hights.

      In fact, if you just want to try out a low model to see how it feels, just go to Home Depot or wherever and pick up a precut 2'x4' piece of luan and set it on some empty coffee cans, and if you don't like it you've still got a coffeetable top.

      Make sure to use a cushion though, or it'll suck.

      Buy two of said boards and you can experiment with different desk/chair hight combinations. Low chair with coffee table hight desk is very nice, but probably not considered suitable for the office.

      KFG

    31. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh... my empire for mod points! You said what we were all thinking!

    32. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by kellman · · Score: 1

      Nah, all those chairs do is make your knees/shins get sore (at least the ones I've sat in). What's better is a yoga/birthing ball. You still build up your trunk muscles, plus you have a lot more fun. When you want to move it, just roll it wherever. Need to be higher or lower? Just pump it up a little more or let a little air out. When you are completely done, it deflates and folds up into nothing. I'd like to see any Swedish kneeler do that.

      Plus, it's *way* more cushy than any standard office chair at 1/20th the price.

      A lady at my work uses one, and now I'm considering getting one for *my* desk.

      --
      I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed...
    33. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      LOL! It's soooo true! I noticed this phenominon while visiting every users PC during an after-hour upgrade a few years ago. Not a pleasant experience!

    34. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by spoonyfork · · Score: 1
      Get your HermanMiller Aeron chairs right here. Bust be damned!

      Currently my azz is molded into one of these in black from Steelcase. Please buy more Michigan products, help our offshore friends keep their jobs!

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    35. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      You could just arrange the keys on your keyboard in DVORAK format .. The keys pop off quite easily on most keybaords.

    36. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by TomServo · · Score: 1

      During the last days of eToys, we had some chairs that were probably similarly priced to Aerons, but were some other type. I wish I could remember what they were, as they were far superior, IMHO.

      We have Aerons at my company now, and they also gave them to all employees who stuck around 6 months or so after the last round of layoffs, so I have one at home as well. They are comfortable, but both my office one and my home one have developed the same problem with the armrests. Eventually, they get loosened up, so when the adjustment screw is tightened up, they can wiggle back and forth and relatively easily slide back down to their lowest position.

      Given that I rarely put any pressure on the arm rests and almost never actually have my arms on them, it seems odd that they'd both get that problem.

    37. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Please just out of curiosity. What are your physical dimensions? How much do you weigh?

      How often do you think an ergonomic chair should be adjusted for you? Answer: Once.

      I can see it now the Planes, Trains & Automobile rental car scene where you play the role of John Candy constantly fiddling with the damn settings.

    38. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by phildog · · Score: 1

      Where can you find auctions for this kind of stuff in the DC area? I need a new lcd monitor, an aeron, and a g4 :-)

      --
      slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
    39. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      But the adjustable parts don't adjust easily, and tend to wear out quickly. At one job, I had an old Aeron where the lumbar support was so worn, it wouldn't stay on the chair! I think you're supposed to replace parts of it as they wear out, but of course nobody does.

      The chairs have a 12 year warranty! Better yet, when something goes wrong (like your lumbar support) they send a tech out to fix the chair for you. You only have yourself to blame if the chair was in that bad of shape.

      you could even tilt it forward so you could squint at your screen without straining your back.

      Are you sure you've ever sat in an Aeron?

    40. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by switcha · · Score: 1
      I am one of the aeron masses, but I went to an editor's studio the other day, and he had Swoppers.

      He basically sits all day every day, and claimed these were the only thing that worked for him. I was skeptical about how something without a back could be comfortable, but I was amazed at what something that forces good posture could feel like. Plus they bounce. Wheeee.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    41. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fm6 · · Score: 1
      How often do you think an ergonomic chair should be adjusted for you? Answer: Once.
      That's not actually true. One strategy for avoiding RSI is to change your posture periodically, so you're not always straining exactly the same muscles. In any case, chairs are often sat in by more than one people (shared desks, people quit and forget to take their chairs with them), and have to be re-adjusted.

      Moot point though. By the time I got this chair, it was in such bad shape I couldn't adjust it at all. Perhaps I would have liked it better if it had been brand new when I got it.

    42. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You could just arrange the keys on your keyboard in DVORAK format .. The keys pop off quite easily on most keybaords."

      Score -1: Too obvious, simple, and efficient

      b.t.w. I think you have the o and a keys swapped on your "keybaord"...

    43. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Hey, I was just a contractor. I took the chair that was given me. Not my job to research its provenance!

      I just started a contract at Adobe. I was sitting in a conference room, filling out all the paperwork, when I noticed a strange little tab sticking out of my chair. I pulled on it, and out came a complete operating manual, permanently attached! Probably a good idea.

    44. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "How often do you think an ergonomic chair should be adjusted for you? Answer: Once."

      I was taught you should change your position regularly. Now I supposed I could do that without re-adjusting the chair (add pillows, sit backwards, put keyboard in lap, etc), but doesn't that defeat the point?

    45. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they are at different angles on newer boards, negating the effect. Stickers or paint work well tho.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    46. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by cfuse · · Score: 2, Funny
      Plus, they make you look goofy, cement your reputation as a flake, and cause people to laugh at you behind your back.

      Who needs a chair for that? I just open my mouth ...

    47. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I am one of the aeron masses, but I went to an editor's studio the other day, and he had Swoppers.

      I could have *sworn* I've seen kids playing on those, coloured pink, and shaped like horses...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    48. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by mixmasterjake · · Score: 1

      to quote fuckedcompany.com, "you can have my aeron when you pry it from my cold, dead ass!"

      i bought two when a former employer went out of business. i'm sitting on one right now. if you can afford it, get it. they rule! especially if you suffer from the case where your ass gets rather warm (in the summer months, for example) from sitting on a cushion all day. the downside is that if you are in a drafty office, there is no insulation to keep your butt warm and i sometimes have to put a blanket on the chair.

      --
      TODO: come up with a clever sig
    49. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I've got one under me right now.. and the fabric back is great for removing heat.. I keep a blanket on mine because otherwise I freeze my ass off. They're not bad.. I do prefer older 80's style desk chairs because I can sit cross-leged in them. I guess sitting normaly for 6 hours of the day is probably better for my back.

    50. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      Probably, I've had mine in my office for a year and a half. I adjusted it once when I got it. Havn't thought about checking the adjustments since. I also weigh 175lbs.

    51. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1
      ROFL!

      That was how I discovered it as well...

      The best part though, I used it to justify SMS server to my boss at the time... I told my boss if he thought it was so funny he could take the corporate olfactory tour the next time. Three weeks later a rack showed up on my desk labeled "SMS Server"...

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
    52. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by datasetgo · · Score: 1

      I've tried the Aeron chair out and it seemed like a decent chair, are they not all they appear?

      They are the shiznit, to use bubble-era terminology.

      Non-ass-numbing comfort for all those long hours of coding. Notice the people that bitch about them are the ones who don't have them. ummm yeahhh... They say things like 'no chair is worth that much'. They have no clue. Hell, they're probably used to being ass-pounded anyways since their company won't sport the cash to make them comfortable and making them work overtime. Or worse, their managers get them and they don't.

    53. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing, and it's by far the best investment of $500 I've ever made, or at least my ass and back tell me so. This one has all the cool features and it's blue, too, so it matches the rug. Cheap and new, sometimes eBay is cool.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    54. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by fermion · · Score: 1
      I had one of those swedish (or whatever they were) chairs you kneel in and found my upper back became very sore, so that didn't last.

      I had one of these in high school and college. It was fully adjustable and worked very well. I have recently seen some in the stores, but these were fixed position POS.

      I still want one. i think it would be very good for my back. Office chairs seem to give me very bad posture. The only thing I worry about is how it will be on my knees.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    55. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb?! They are the ultimate status symbol for us sorry contractors at HP. You can even brag about having a broken Aeron, because it's so much cooler than the other worn, crappy hand-me-downs we get from the high and mighty REAL employees!

      Uh, not that I'm bitter or anything...

    56. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the HIGH resolution picture of The Flatulence Filter pad http://www.flatulence-filter.com/new%20product.htm
      2060 x 1550 pix !

    57. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by MickLinux · · Score: 1
      It seemed to me that MP3 went due to the lawsuits and harrassment from RIAA, not because they had a particularly flawed business model

      Seems to me, that if your business model brings with it harrassment from the RIAA that is bad enough to put you out of business, then you have a flawed business model.

      To put this into perspective, consider: Al Capone is running the Chicago liquer industry, with mega profits. You notice this, and say "Great opportunity! I'll get in, undercut his prices by 25%, and still make a killing!". Of course, your business model does not account for his next move, nor are you prepared to fight a war with him, so you lose. That's a flawed business model, if you ask me.

      Thing is, business isn't run in a vacuum. You've got to consider the society into which you enter business. Our current society encourages the formation of businesses like the RIAA, and your business model had better account for that.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    58. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by buttahead · · Score: 1

      how does it work? looks like a bar stool to me... and I've lounged on many a bar stool. they never seemed to improve my posture.

    59. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I've been using one of these chairs for about 5 years. I will mourn the day it fails me.

      I figure that's a long ways off, since the one I am sitting in is 5 years old and the factory mesh ass hammock is still just as tight and sturdy as it was new.

    60. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      The only thing I worry about is how it will be on my knees.

      Ask Monica Lewinsky.

      Chris

    61. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by lewp · · Score: 1

      You do realize you can say "fuck", "bitch", and "ass" on Slashdot, don't you?

      I say this not because it's particularly interesting, or because I think you should cuss more, but because it seems silly to actually use the words but be afraid to type them.

      So I'm not completely offtopic:

      Aerons are okay, but not much more than that. I sit in a piece of plastic patio furniture at home and in an Aeron at work. The Aeron is more comfortable, but definitely not $700 worth.

      Furthermore, it's not appreciably better than any decent adjustable office chair I've ever sat in, unless you happen to have a back sweating problem. In that case I imagine the mesh seating surface would be rather handy.

      If I, like so many who own them, had managed to steal an Aeron from an employer, I'd probably sit in it. That's only because my patio chair (also stolen) isn't exactly much competition.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    62. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine keeps a lookout for me, he basically just keeps track of the auctions being handled by the major auction companies. If he shows up online soon, I'll ask him which ones he uses.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    63. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by switcha · · Score: 1
      They're on a big spring, and you can kinda bounce up and down and tip it from side to side. The fact that it moves around under you sorta forces you to stay balanced over it and sit up straight.

      It's almost impossible to slouch and keep your balance on it, but at the same time, it's not very taxing on your back or abdomen muscles to stay balanced, and you can sit comfortably for hours.

      I wouldn't endorse running out and buying one just because, but if you're ever at a store that sells them, they're worth a test sit, for sure.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    64. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      But the thing is, you look ever so much more important in an Aeron chair! Because they're very very expensive.

      The Aeron chair says "Behold! I am so spectacularly important that my ass - which is also spectacularly important - requires a $700 item of seating technology!"

      Plastic patio furniture says "Behold! I require furniture which can be cleaned with Formula 409, if necessary!"

      The fact that both chairs are functionally equivalent is completely irrelevant. If Aeron chairs were sold at Target for $25, no one would ever have heard about them.

    65. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by lewp · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the amount of back sweat an individual produces is directly proportional to their importance?

      --
      Game... blouses.
    66. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think they made Aerons out of fishnet so that executives could be sure that everyone could see their ENTIRE suit.

      After all, what's the point of dropping a couple grand on a monkey suit if your office chair blocks some of it from view?

    67. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      If you read carefully you'll notice that the Hummer and Harley were not owned by MP3.com. In their words:
      This item was not owned by MP3.COM, Inc. and is consigned by a third party.

      --
      -Rich
    68. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      > You do realize you can say "fuck", "bitch", and > "ass" on Slashdot, don't you? Fuck, Bitch, Don't be such an ass on slashdot. Thanks for the insight. I feel better already.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    69. Re:Those Dumb Chairs by lewp · · Score: 1

      Well done.

      --
      Game... blouses.
  3. Heh. by SandSpider · · Score: 5, Funny

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    Very clever, trying to convince everyone not to bid on the Aeron chairs in order to keep the costs down.

    =Brian

    --
    There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    1. Re:Heh. by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Also trying to keep the price of the laptops and workstations down.

      "... hopelessly out of date ..."

      But all that junk that they had is amazing! Why would you need an arcade? Why have a Hummer? Pool tables, etc. Why?

      If the people who were doing the purchasing had actually made the money themselves, they wouldn't have been spending it like water.

    2. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back then it was thought that you needed to have all of those luxury items to attract the cream of the crop. Now all you need is a paper hat and a microphone so they can take orders for Big Macs.

    3. Re:Heh. by uberdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. No mention about how the shoddy hummer has no passenger room, that it's rusting, and gets poor mileage. Clearly he is hoping to score the chairs while everyone is focussed on a cheezy yuppie-mobile that no one in their right mind would bid on, if they looked past the glitzy exterior. In fact, I suggest that everyone just forget the hummer and bid on the chairs.

    4. Re:Heh. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      They could be buying it for the tax credit.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:Heh. by MadAhab · · Score: 1

      Anyone who pretends an Aeron is a pointless extravagance and that a Hummer is really cool cannot be over 16 yrs old, have an IQ above 70, AND be serious.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    6. Re:Heh. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Umm the Hummer has had a new engine put in it. at 50k miles it needed a new engine what the F$@# Do you really want something that will burn more gas than you paid for the whole vecihle????

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Heh. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Anyone who hasn't driven a mid to late 90's Hummer doesn't realize what a good tool they are, before they began to be used as penis extensions. They are meant to take a beating that any other truck would disintegrate at.

      But a Hummer H2, yea, might as well have been made by TOYota.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:Heh. by SnappleMaster · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure the original Hummer was a hella good vehicle. But do all the suburbanites really need a Hummer (whether or not its shitty)? These are folks who drive from their home to the office with the occasional side-trip to Safeway.

      Everyone talks about the war being all about oil but nobody talks about America's dependence on foreign oil combined with the current trend stupidly big yuppie-mobiles.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    9. Re:Heh. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      might as well have been made by TOYota.

      Yeah, except that it'd be called Tundra.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Heh. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      And what about the weights below the Fat Boy? Cmon, no geek is interested in physical exercise. They look newer and less used than the brand new set at my local sports store.

    11. Re:Heh. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Anyone who pretends an Aeron is a pointless extravagance and that a Hummer is really cool cannot be over 16 yrs old, have an IQ above 70, AND be serious.

      I suspect he was continuing the "saying Aerons are dumb to keep auction price down" joke, but turning it around to say "forget the Hummer, bid on the CHAIRS". Re-read the post.
      Jokes, people, they're just jokes.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Very clever, trying to convince everyone not to bid on the Aeron chairs in order to keep the costs down.

      These aren't the chairs you're looking for...

  4. Slashdot: home of expert furniture critics? by koreth · · Score: 5, Informative
    The prices might have been ridiculously high, but those Aeron chairs are pretty comfortable. I got one as a gift way back when they first came out, before they were hot items -- benefits of having relatives in the interior design biz -- and I still use it every day. I can stay comfortably seated for marathon coding or gaming sessions with no backache or sore muscles afterwards, which isn't true of most other chairs I've had over the years. (Yes, I do take breaks ordinarily, but on occasion I'll be deep into something and not notice how much time has gone by, a feeling I'm sure is familiar to many Slashdotters.)

    So by all means knock the fad surrounding it, but it's pretty silly to knock a perfectly good piece of furniture just because it became fashionable for a brief time.

    1. Re:Slashdot: home of expert furniture critics? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can say the same thing about a chair that I bought at Office Depot in Dallas for $149.00. It even has the little holes in it.

    2. Re:Slashdot: home of expert furniture critics? by TobySmurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, I never had one of my own, but I consulted at a few places that had them - one bankrupcy trustee office had them everywhere. Anyhow, I found someone who was small like me, with a similar build, and I tried his chair - they feel "odd", but nothing special - at first. Then, I ended up using his chair over a whole weekend while I did a server recovery - the chair is astounding - normally my shoulders get sore after 5 or 6 hours in the chair - not so with the Aeron. Hmmm, maybe I should bid on one myself...

  5. Questions need to be answered! by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who the hell is "Pootie"?

    What the hell is This Thing?

    Does all This Stuff come with the hat and the giant Pez?

    Inquiring minds want to know!

    Oh, and dibs on the Rocket Ship. ;)

    1. Re:Questions need to be answered! by budhaboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that second thing is the secret teleporter that they were working on...

    2. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya know, that site looks suspiciously like cowanalextender.com

      Moo.

    3. Re:Questions need to be answered! by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative
      Does all This Stuff come with the hat and the giant Pez?

      Just a heads up, the giant Pez container just has many packs of normal Pez inside, not the giant Pez candies we crave.

    4. Re:Questions need to be answered! by BlewScreen · · Score: 4, Funny

      no - it's Marge Simpson's tin-foil hat...

      -bs

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    5. Re:Questions need to be answered! by tedtimmons · · Score: 5, Informative

      I dunno what Pootie is/was. Behind that rack are probably some Rimage CD burners. DAM CDs anyone?

      "this thing" is just an artsy piece. I always snickered, because it looks like a condom. The silver stuff is a stretchy fabric. It doesn't go up and down, even though it looks like it might.

      "this stuff". Heh. I don't know whose office that was. Those desks are really cool- the two sections are adjustable. There's a crank so you can bump them up and down.

      The rocket ship is from the College Tour, where Goo Goo Dolls showed their reliance on ProTools.

      MP3.com died because they lacked a solid business plan.

      -ted, at mppp from July 99 to Jan 03.

    6. Re:Questions need to be answered! by vinton · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is "Pootie"?

      Pootie Tang

    7. Re:Questions need to be answered! by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      > What the hell is This Thing?

      Dude, that's clearly an Orgasmotron.

      John.

    8. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      No, it is the "Business Time Machine" that they wanted to use to go back in time to undo their poor business decisions.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    9. Re:Questions need to be answered! by mattgreen · · Score: 1

      That would teleport them to a real business plan? Yeah, I'm mean. :)

    10. Re:Questions need to be answered! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That Thing" appears to be the top off the Sybian that the Jolly Green Giant's wife ordered on the sly.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought I'd see a Sleeper reference on /.

    12. Re:Questions need to be answered! by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      That thing is the giant bong that management was smoking when they came up with the business plan. It's a piece of Internet history.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    13. Re:Questions need to be answered! by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Maybe pootie is a reference to the movie Pootie Tang. The front character on the inlay cover seems to match the character in the drawing. The cabinet looks like something dedicated to telephony. Maybe it used to house dedicated "private outgoing tie lines".

    14. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bart had the tin-foil hat, dumbass.

    15. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What the hell is This Thing

      I don't know, but Osama Bin Laden and N. Korea ordered 10 of them each.

    16. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't think it looks quite like that, the first thing I thought after clicking the link was "Oh god, I'm at work and I just clicked something that begins with 'cowanal'"

      Which proves two points:
      1. I shouldn't /. at work
      and
      2. I've been browsing at -1 for too long.

    17. Re:Questions need to be answered! by wiggles · · Score: 1

      You know, I just don't understand how a company that bought all that unnecessary crap could ever go out of business. The more money you spend, the longer you stay in business, right?

    18. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Malfourmed · · Score: 1

      And if you look at John's username, he probably knows that for a fact.

    19. Re:Questions need to be answered! by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0
      where is the exit?

      me thinking about Team Fortress now ;) ( of course the steam version )

    20. Re:Questions need to be answered! by misaochankun · · Score: 1

      "This Thing" is a light actually. The silver is a soft silk-like cloth with metal rings keeping the shape. It has wheels on the bottom, and a large flap on hinges. I used that thing to block the sunlight when I held movies viewing in the BAR (Big Ass Room) there. There were two of them that sat on either end of the security desk. The light was a cool looking blue color, and I think I remember it having moving parts inside at some point. The rockets were cooler when you got two together and made one big one. I miss that place a lot.

    21. Re:Questions need to be answered! by Stultsinator · · Score: 1

      I think "Pootie" refers to the 2001 blaxploitation spoof movie "Pootie Tang"

      The professional reviews don't do this movie justice. It was a non-stop laugh riot.

  6. Sad Sad Sad by litewoheat · · Score: 0, Troll

    A company with that much crap with no revenues totally deserves to die. I hope the founders are in jail right now. Although they probably aren't Well then I hope they're bankrupt. But again they're probably on a beach somewhere getting a tan while earning interest on their ill gotten gains...

    1. Re:Sad Sad Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you give a chimp a gun, you can't blame the chimp if he shoots your granny ...

      We ALL knew during the bubble that these companies were frauds, but we didn't care because we were ALL playing the market like a casino. The only people to blame are ourselves, the investors.

    2. Re:Sad Sad Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Michael Robertson, founder and CEO of MP3, is currently founder and CEO of Lindows. http://www.lindows.com/lindows_about_profiles.php

  7. Extra stuff by savagedome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    servers and notebooks that are probably hopelessly out of date

    But if these machines have hard drivers still hooked up, then there might be lots of interesting stuff lying around on those (maybe mp3s too!)

    1. Re:Extra stuff by MP3Chuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "maybe mp3s too!"

      I wouldn't be suprised ... it's my understanding that they didn't delete them. In fact people who had streaming links in their playlist reported that they were working for some time after the site officially shut down.

      Though as much personal information they had, between artists and listeners, I hope they at least gave the HDD's a once-over formatting.

  8. Video games... by iiioxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the photos, auction items also include a few full-size arcade cabinets (no big surprise, they're pretty much a dot-com staple).

    1. Re:Video games... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More than a few, they had a 10,000 sq foot arcade full of pool tables, foosball and arcade cabinets.

      I'd proably bid on a couple of the machines, but crating and shipping to the east coast would cost more than they're worth.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Video games... by misaochankun · · Score: 1

      The video games were sorta my fault. We bought what was cheap and still fun, they didn't give us much to work with. When we bought those arcade machines, it was after the big spending, but they wanted to keep the engineers happy. The galaga machine is not worth the effort, as the monitor is dead. Ms Pacman works great, and so does 1942 and Soul Edge(Yes, the original, the game before Soul Calibar) MKII worked decently, and the rest isn't worth more than a few hundred bucks for the lot. They require a lot of maintenance because the parts are old. I had to replace the street fighter parts constantly for just the little use we had from employees.

  9. Aeron Chairs... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, sure, these chairs came to symbolise the greed of the Dotom Bubble, and they may be "dumb and popular", but there's no denying one thing: they are comfortable. Ask anyone who's ever sat in one, and they will agree. Definitely not worth the $750 per chair that my company paid for them at the time, but they are very comfortable.

    1. Re:Aeron Chairs... by philbert26 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, sure, these chairs came to symbolise the greed of the Dotom Bubble, and they may be "dumb and popular", but there's no denying one thing: they are comfortable. Ask anyone who's ever sat in one, and they will agree. Definitely not worth the $750 per chair that my company paid for them at the time, but they are very comfortable.

      Wow, I used to have one of those chairs when I worked for the government. I didn't know that they were so expensive. They sure are nice, though. I wish I had one right now. Hey...

    2. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And here I am sitting on an old 486 full tower which I've been using as a chair for the past week... yeah, sure, rub it in.

    3. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Joseff · · Score: 1

      I worked at Mondera.com during its start up (during the dotcom boom) and was introduced to these chairs. These things are so comfortable that when I left I asked if I could take one. Of course they said no. The Bums :(

      --
      --- Lost Sig. Reward if found.
    4. Re:Aeron Chairs... by p4ul13 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I saw the URL "cowanalexander.com" and briefly thought "Cow Anal Exander dot Com?!?!". What sick bastards are posting here, and what the hell is an 'exander'?

      Sorry.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    5. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Well at least you found a good use for the 486...

    6. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      486 tower? Your lucky. I'm currently using an Amiga 500 as a lean-to.

    7. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 4, Funny

      what the hell is an 'exander'?

      Typical Slashdot misspelling. That should read 'expander.'

    8. Re:Aeron Chairs... by elzahir · · Score: 1
      • Damn
      comfortable. Sitting on one now.

      Of course I do work for a bankrupt company, but I'm sure the two things are unrelated.
      --
      For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled - R Feynman
    9. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Lando · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, anybody is a overly generic term... I started having back pain when we switched over to these chairs, after a month I snuck in one of my chairs from home...

      Supposedly the new chairs, were ergonomic, but the didn't work for me at all.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    10. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Vraeden · · Score: 1

      My previous company replaced my chair with one of these while I was on vacation. I was not happy as the previous chair was the only thing I had actually asked for while there. I never liked the Aeron. It was thin, cold, stiff, and inflexible. It had plenty of adjustable parts, but my armrests wouldn't stay put. My old chair had a 4 inch thick cushion with wooden, unadjustable armrests and a high back that was perfect for relaxing after a particularly straining computer task. I don't even think the new chair helped with my occasional back aches--the only thing that helped was going to the gym and lifting weights on a regular basis.

    11. Re:Aeron Chairs... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      the company i used to work for used an eletronic dorr lock system made by a company called ilco. ilco was bought by a company called unican. the new company was ilco-unican. my boss set the password for the lock box to ilcomenu, his seeing ilco menu. i saw i'll come in you.

      nothing could suprise him more than when i explained my mnemonic device to him later.

    12. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      So THATS where goatse got moved to, eh?

    13. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's what I thought, too. I had to really look at it to get past that.

      I guess we both spend too much time reading /.

    14. Re:Aeron Chairs... by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      "I saw the URL "cowanalexander.com" and briefly thought "Cow Anal Exander dot Com?!?!". What sick bastards are posting here, and what the hell is an 'exander'?"

      "I'll take `Anal bum cover' for $200 Alex."
      (SNL reference)

    15. Re:Aeron Chairs... by anaplasmosis · · Score: 1

      Except they aren't. I'm 6'3" and 250lbs & I have a large Aeron (you did know they were sized, didn't you?) It's too small. The seat squab is too narrow and at the end of the day my upper thighs are very sore from sitting on the edges of the squab. I stole an ordinary office chair from a meeting room and that's far superior. And the $150 leather "Captains Chair" I bought in Office World for home use is better again. All those who didn't manage to steal one when MP3.com went down; don't worry - they aren't worth the hassle.

    16. Re:Aeron Chairs... by farnsaw · · Score: 1

      "Ask anyone who's ever sat in one, and they will agree" Incorrect! I had one of these for my desk chair for 4 months and it never failed to be uncomfortable for me. After several complaints they brought in an expert to adjust it for me. It still was not anywhere close to comfortable. The company ended up buying me a "regular" office chair. The main reason it was not comfortable is that the saddle or seat or whatever you call it is to narrow for me. Yes, I am your typical coder who is a bit wider than the average person. These chairs were just not designed with us in mind.

      --
      "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  10. This explain alot by El · · Score: 3, Funny

    What in their business model suggested to them "You know, we could make a LOT more money delivering music online if me spend company funds to buy a Harley and a Hummer!"

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:This explain alot by tntguy · · Score: 0, Funny

      The ??? step?

  11. Correction by ThousandStars · · Score: 1, Funny
    "...Plus, they've got pictures!"

    I'd like to amend the blurb to: "Plus, they had pictures, until they were posted to the front page of slashdot."

    This comes from the ~20th comment.

  12. A Hummer? by vijayiyer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe if companies like MP3.com used their VC to build their businesses rather than buy Hummers, so many wouldn't have gone under. I bet you can't even listen to MP3s over the roar of the diesel in that thing...

    1. Re:A Hummer? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Maybe if companies like MP3.com used their VC to build their businesses rather than buy Hummers, so many wouldn't have gone under. I bet you can't even listen to MP3s over the roar of the diesel in that thing...

      What? Hummer is not the trademark of success? The current California Guv was one an early adopter, how can you associate having a Hummer with impending doom...

      Ah, sh!t, never mind... Mar. 2, election. Watch the big debt bond issue go to the masses to approve.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:A Hummer? by tedtimmons · · Score: 1

      I don't think it belonged to us at MP3.com.. I think they are throwing them in from some other account. MP3.com was leasing a Jeep Cherokee for a while, that was the only 'company vehicle'.

      -ted, mppp 7/99-1/03

    3. Re:A Hummer? by myg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahhh how I miss the good old days when corrupt business men purchased a different kind of hummer with corporate money.

    4. Re:A Hummer? by first.last · · Score: 1

      Now now, all hummers aren't bad....

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    5. Re:A Hummer? by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1
      I don't know about "building their business" what they should have done was put together a serious legal defense fund and established a legal dream team up front.

      Of course, what's the cost of a Hummer or Harley compared to a set of really really good layers? It's like round off error.

    6. Re:A Hummer? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> 1997 Hummer H1 - 4 door Open Top
      >> Yellow, 50K Miles, New Engine 1000 miles ago

      Well, apparently they could hear just fine at 49k miles.

    7. Re:A Hummer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why pay for a hummer when you can rent one: ie hire a cutie with no job skills other than "skills that can't be taught"?

    8. Re:A Hummer? by myg · · Score: 1
      You know the penalty for not putting the correct cover sheets on the TPS reports: It's blowjob time!

      With my luck they will all get the memo.

  13. Aerons "Dumb"? by TPIRman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The pricey Herman Miller Aeron chair may have become a symbol of dot-com excesses, but to call it "dumb" is going overboard -- it's a great chair. It's gotten somewhat of a bum rap because many people never take the five minutes to adjust the chair to their body shape. Once you make the proper adjustments, it's heaven. I never understood why you wouldn't properly calibrate a "peripheral" that you use 100% of the time while you're working. Treat your ass with respect!

    1. Re:Aerons "Dumb"? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you saying you have to calibrate your ass?

    2. Re:Aerons "Dumb"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These chairs absolutely suck. I had one at my last job, and I hated it. I usually sit with my legs folded up indian-style, even in office chairs. Try it in one of those Aerons; you'll find out pretty quickly that it's a bad idea. The hard plastic sides turn your feet upward an 45+ degree angles. Ouch.

    3. Re:Aerons "Dumb"? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Funny

      "These chairs absolutely suck. I had one at my last job, and I hated it. I usually sit with my legs folded up indian-style, even in office chairs. Try it in one of those Aerons; you'll find out pretty quickly that it's a bad idea. The hard plastic sides turn your feet upward an 45+ degree angles. Ouch."

      I never thought I would see the need to suggest that someone RTFM for a chair.

    4. Re:Aerons "Dumb"? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      If you drink Bud

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Aerons "Dumb"? by NetFu · · Score: 1

      I know they are nice chairs, but they won't be worth much to you if you try them and can't see much of a difference. It's all about the value of the product to the individual in question.

      My BMW is worth a lot more to me than I paid for it, but to someone else who likes their Mustang my BMW may be "dumb".

      I tried one of the Aerons for a week and went back to a normal desk chair (a real one, not a secretary's chair). I don't get "sore" from sitting in a chair for 5-15 hours, but that's just me -- I sit on a lightly carpetted concrete floor for hours at home while playing video games before I need to go stretch my legs.

      The bottom line is this: to a lot of people like me the Aeron chairs just plain suck because they seem so overpriced. Sell the same chair for $150, and we'll call it a great chair...

  14. why pick on the Aeron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    You got something against the Aeron? I'm sitting in one right now, I've been using it everyday for years, it is hands-down the best chair I've ever plopped my ass down in.

    I used to have back pains every morning after sitting a lot, and discomfort after long coding sessions, even with an alarm that I set to tell me to stand up every 30 minutes. But all that went away with the Aeron, it is a "life changer".

    It got popular during the boom, like every expensive luxary item. How come you don't say "big dumb Hummer trucks", it seems like every dotcom CEO had one.

    Just sticking up for a good product. I have several other Herman Miller products, including a *very* nice Eames lounge chair, they are worth the money.

    1. Re:why pick on the Aeron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have back pains every morning after sitting a lot, and discomfort after long coding sessions, even with an alarm that I set to tell me to stand up every 30 minutes. But all that went away with the Aeron, it is a "life changer".

      Here is the true life-changer.

      Google cache for those who don't want to open a Word document

    2. Re:why pick on the Aeron? by retinaburn · · Score: 1

      I would love to have an Aeron. As it stands (sits?) we all have Herman Miller chairs but they are ugly green circa 1980's chairs, that have no support and have succumbed to wear and tear. The vertical lift is broken so depending on how hard you sit down directly determines how fast the air leaks out and you are basically sitting on the floor. Now our cubes, thats another rant....

  15. same old story? by nil5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I participated in the Enron auction, and let me tell you it was utterly a waste of time. The prices really were hardly less than retail value, and considering that the equipment was used (i was mostly interested in computers and lcd's) it was overpriced. What you had were lots of dumb folks out there that jacked up the prices so that nothing was really all that good of a deal or anything to be surprised about. I swear there were used 15" LCD's going for $4-500. You could buy one from BestBuy for that price last year.

    I'm just really skeptical about these auctions. I found that it really wasn't worth the effort of getting registered, calling in, etc.

    1. Re:same old story? by Bilestoad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So now you know how auctions work, eh? If there weren't "dumb folks out there that jacked up the prices" why would anyone go to the trouble of arranging an auction? Ever sold anything on eBay? Try an experiment - sell some old crap with plenty of pictures and a gushing description and watch the money roll in - it's uncanny how some people want garbage.

    2. Re:same old story? by nil5 · · Score: 1

      well yeah, theoretically in a market the price will be exactly how much people are willing to pay for agood or service.

      what makes auctions interesting is that usually with used equipment it will be discounted to reflect depreciation and the fact that it is obviously "not new"(this is attractive to some people for subjective reasons).

      And your reference to ebay is really half the story. I've bought a number of things on eBay which were great items, equivalent to a new item but for significantly less. the point i was trying to make was that these people were extraordinarily dumb in that they would pay "new" prices for "used" items. the fact taht enron had so many to give away seemed to insinuate an "everything must go" sort of desperation, which was clearly not the case (but insinuating that worked excellently well to attract bidders).
      if only they had realized that there was no incentive to purchase at the auction. Many of those auctions are "as-is", you know, and so you couldn't have the service possible from a retail store (eg being able to return a defective unit).

    3. Re:same old story? by pebs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing about live auctions (as opposed to web auctions) is that people don't have a chance to research the items they are buying (unless they come prepared). They just show up, think they are getting a great deal and fork out the cash, sometimes paying more than the cost of a new item.

      With online auctions its not as bad, because people can take their time and research the item.

      --
      #!/
    4. Re:same old story? by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That reminds me of a experiment that my dad and I undertook a few years back. We were trudging through a Hobby Lobby with my mom, looking at silly kinck-knacks that nobody ever buys and he got the idea to put one on ebay.

      We found an 'old looking' horse coach model and bought it for 5 dollars that day. He put it up on ebay and said that "we found it in the attic. It must be comething that my grandmother bought back in the day. It seems really old but overall it looks like new."

      5 days later it sold for $25.

    5. Re:same old story? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I brought an ex-enron PC from an auction on ebay. I didn't know it was from enron until after I brought it. It was only a P3 mini workstation thing, but it was very cheap.

      When I took it apart to add another network card I found no dust inside it. It looked like it had not been used for more than a few hours.

      It's been up running openbsd for over 100 days now.

      Total bargain, I was well chuffed. I don't know if the guy that brought it from the auction and resold it on ebay made any money though.

    6. Re:same old story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nice experiment in deception and ripping people off.

    7. Re:same old story? by skooba · · Score: 1

      uh, what is "chuffed"?

    8. Re:same old story? by pyrotic · · Score: 1

      The Enron sale had way too much media/gravedigger attention. When their assets were sold off here in the UK, you had to slap down a fifty just to get in the door (refundable after purchase).

      I did buy a couple of HP boxes at another dotcom sale, for not too much, PIII, 1G RAM, 2 SCSI HD's. They're still in use now.

    9. Re:same old story? by Bilestoad · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can make a living from improving eBay descriptions (and people do). You see it all the time - some estate sale scrounging idiot finds a "set of old camera lenses" called "sumicron" and "elmer" and "lietz". Sells all five for $30, buy it now! Thing is those lenses are worth $500, easily, if photographed and described properly.

      You don't have to get lucky and find people who can't even transcribe a manufacturer's name properly (although I've bought "Rollieflex", "Rolliflex" and "Rollie Flex" cameras for good prices and sold them for profit), anyone who can't turn off caps lock, take a clear picture with a cheap digicam or even find a cheap digicam in the first place is presenting you with an opportunity to buy low and sell high. I'm reliably informed that is the secret of making money.

    10. Re:same old story? by 1s44c · · Score: 1


      Happy, glad.

    11. Re:same old story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi!

      chuffed is happy, you illiterate yank. Couldn't use an online dictionary?

      At least you learned something today.

      Cheers,
      GNU/Wolfgang

    12. Re:same old story? by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Bastard!! I bought that stupid horse coach!!

      (Although I guess you've saved me the embarassment of finding this out in public on Antique Roadshow...)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    13. Re:same old story? by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      I think you have it backwards. The live auctions allow you to "preview" the stuff a few days before and you can use this time to look for deals, such as a PC with a second HDD or something labeled with 256MB, but has 1GB. Then you can bid on them at the auction and come out with some good deals.

      Online auctions you never even get to see the stuff, unless you are in the area and can go preview it, like I said. You have no idea what condition it is in, etc. I used to work for a company where that was our business model. Preview auctions, buy, tear out all of the goodies, sell the parts for 2x the price of the original item.

      -Comedian

    14. Re:same old story? by skooba · · Score: 1
      from merriam webster's online dictionary for illiterate yanks:

      Main Entry: 2chuff Function: intransitive verb Etymology: imitative : to produce noisy exhaust or exhalations : proceed or operate with chuffs

    15. Re:same old story? by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      That's not an experiment in seeing if people will buy something useless, that's an experiment in intentionally deceiving someone as to what you're selling.

      Junk hunters can gamble on those types of purchases if people are honest, instead you knowingly ripped one of them off.

    16. Re:same old story? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      What you had were lots of dumb folks out there that jacked up the prices so that nothing was really all that good of a deal or anything to be surprised about

      I've noticed a similar problem with eBay lately. Too many people with just barely too much money. They end up bidding OVER RETAIL in some cases!!!

      So they have enough money that they don't care enough about how much they pay to do some research, but not enough that they don't just go pay "full price" for the items...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    17. Re:same old story? by joggle · · Score: 1

      Boy your dad was setting a great example. God, did ethics ever come up during any conversations?

  16. I hope its just not me by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 5, Funny
    but I am having a hard time dealing with that name

    cowanalexander

    Something is just plain wrong with it.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    1. Re:I hope its just not me by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a dash in there would really help parse it a bit better.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:I hope its just not me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing it with cowanalexaminer.

  17. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Life2Short · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah but Galaga & Ms. Pacman? Sheesh! And I thought I was hard up for entertainment... I appreciate the classics as much as the next fellow, but come on... A coporation might stand out with a Tempest machine, but I think if I were interviewing with a firm and I saw Galaga & Ms. Pacman, I'd like to think that the handwriting was on the wall...

  18. MP3.com timeline by dtio · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a quick, brief MP3.com timeline:

    July 1999 - MP3.com floats, raising $344 million.

    August 2000 - MP3.com pays Sony $20m in damages for copyright infringement

    September 2000 - MP3.com pays Universal $250m in damages for copyright infringement

    May 2001 - Vivendi Universal announces intention to purchase MP3.com

    Vivendi-Universal's former chief executive Jean-Marie Messier bought MP3.com for $372m in 2001 and integrated it into Vivendi Universal Net. The rise of file-sharing, the dot.com crash and perceptions of MP3.com as a 'sell-out' resulted in the investment failing to meet its potential.

    November 14, 2003

    MP3.com to close

    CNET has acquired MP3.com and will be shutting down the downloading service. According to an email sent to MP3.com subscribers, the site will no longer be available as of December 2nd. According to the same email, CNET is planning to launch a service in the future.

    Feb 25, 2004

    Complete Liquidation of 100,000 sq ft facility - 100s of Servers (Sun, Compaq, HP, & Dell) Clarion EMC Storage - 100s of PCs, Notebooks, Printers - 100s of Herman Miller Aeron Chairs - 10,000 sq ft health club - Pool Table, Foosball, Video Arcade Games, Ping Pong. Artwork, Collectable Musical instruments, Contemporary Furniture & more...

    1. Re:MP3.com timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feb 26, 2004:

      Profit!!!

    2. Re:MP3.com timeline by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Complete Liquidation of 100,000 sq ft facility - 100s of Servers (Sun, Compaq, HP, & Dell) Clarion EMC Storage - 100s of PCs, Notebooks, Printers - 100s of Herman Miller Aeron Chairs - 10,000 sq ft health club - Pool Table, Foosball, Video Arcade Games, Ping Pong. Artwork, Collectable Musical instruments, Contemporary Furniture & more...

      What the heck are they doing with all this hardware? How can it possibly be required? A horrible waste of resources.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:MP3.com timeline by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Exactly - $28M profit in two years ($372M purchase just 22 months after $344M investment). Looks like about 4% per year, and that was through the dot-com burst period.

      Of course, if you consider the $250M damage award to the eventual purchaser, the effective sales price was quite a bit lower. Call it a "pre- rebate!"

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:MP3.com timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, i bet it's the most money they've made so far.

    5. Re:MP3.com timeline by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Complete Liquidation of 100,000 sq ft facility - 100s of Servers (Sun, Compaq, HP, & Dell) Clarion EMC Storage - 100s of PCs, Notebooks, Printers - 100s of Herman Miller Aeron Chairs - 10,000 sq ft health club - Pool Table, Foosball, Video Arcade Games, Ping Pong. Artwork, Collectable Musical instruments, Contemporary Furniture & more...

      Dude, the most important thing that everyone seems to be missing is that there's TONS of recording equipment there.

      I'm totally surprised by the amount of studio equipment that's in the pictures. They must have had some pretty decent setups to do recordings.

      Someone @ MP3.com was obviously fascinated by it, but I don't recall ever hearing about artists actually recording at their facilities.

    6. Re:MP3.com timeline by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2, Informative

      The setup looks more like a mediocre live performance setup than anything you might see in a studio recording environment.

    7. Re:MP3.com timeline by misaochankun · · Score: 1

      It is sad how easily the life of MP3.com can be summed up, but it was a lot more than just a few lines. All that studio equipment? There were a lot of artists that recorded at the company, and all the voice/video work for MP3.com was all in house. We had a very do-it-yourself attitude with everything we could get away with. If you think the audio stuff was impressive, you should have seen the video equipment.

  19. There Can Be... Only One! by SeinJunkie · · Score: 1

    The biggest shame? They're selling the Soul Edge cabinet!
    Please someone snatch that up!

  20. Exactly why.... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly why these companies went belly up. You barely have a product in an ill defined niche with no real defined revenue stream. Yet, the company is able to build all sorts of cool little baubles, model rocket ships, framed guitars, high end ass buckets, Hummer automobiles, work out equipment etc...etc...etc... from start up capital.

    This is exactly why I want to see first hand any startup company that I am interested in investing in. Field trips aren't just for grade schoolers.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Exactly why.... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yet, the company is able to build all sorts of cool little baubles, model rocket ships, framed guitars, high end ass buckets, Hummer automobiles, work out equipment etc...etc...etc... from start up capital.

      Anyone who invests in a start-up company or OTC stock without checking it out first deserves what they get.

      On a more insightful note do you this was part of the tech bubble or the more recent trend towards corporate corruption? Why the hell would anyone waste limited start-up funds on hummers unless they weren't serious about seeing the company succeed in the first place?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Exactly why.... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I want to see first hand any startup company that I am interested in investing in. Field trips aren't just for grade schoolers.


      I found this out the hard way 8 months ago, when I invested in that fly-by-night Colonial Museum.
    3. Re:Exactly why.... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would anyone waste limited start-up funds on hummers unless they weren't serious about seeing the company succeed in the first place?

      Either that, or so convinced that they couldnt fail.

      To play devil's advocate.. The .com boom was a hiring frenzy, good programmers were in demand everywhere. So all the goodies and the arcade and company hummer, etc, served as much to entice talent.

      Reminds me of the Atari of the late 70s. They made it a mission to make Atari the "coolest place to work", hot tubs, live bands in the cafeteria, etc.. The idea was that the best and brightest, and most creative, kids coming out of college would chomp at the bit to come work for them... And they did.

      Of course the bottom fell out of the video game industry in 83, and Atari really dropped the ball (producing more ET game carts than there were Atari systems to play them on wasn't bright) much like the bubble of the 'net burst. But they really didn't see that coming, they saw their company as 'the next big thing'.

      If you wanted the best and brightest in a tight labor market, you aren't going to get it with rows of grey cubicles and Office Depot task chairs.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Exactly why.... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you wanted the best and brightest in a tight labor market, you aren't going to get it with rows of grey cubicles and Office Depot task chairs.

      Yeah but there are better ways to get it then Hummers. I'd rather have flex-time then a chance to take the company Hummer out for a spin once a month or so. I'm sure 95% of the /. readership would agree.

      That's just common sense.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Exactly why.... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hummers aren't that pricy, as far as corporate vehicles go. You need something to take investors out to power lunches in. If Hummer was the image they were looking for, good for them.

      Would you feel better if it was a Bentley or something?

      Why are slashdotters so personally offended by all this.

      Yeah, having money means buying some cool shit. They had over 400 million in capital, not just start up capital. They were making it had over fist, they had no idea Universal was going to sue them for everything they had, and win..

      Big deal, business fails.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Exactly why.... by haystor · · Score: 1

      Give me a bunch of dinosaurs in a boring workplace and I'll take on any company full of Aeron's, Hummers and foosball tables.

      --
      t
    7. Re:Exactly why.... by Bombcar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You want to know the secret? It is appearances. If they have a boring cubicle farm and realistic goals, then no venture capitalist wants to give them BIG money.

      But if they have a flashy business plan, and all sorts of things that "break the corporate model," then they can say that they're going to "create a paradigm shift" and "change the laws of business."

      Otherwise, they get no more venture capital. A venture capital funded company is usually trying to get more venture capital, so all that junk is basically marketing for the moneybags.

      "See! We're revitalized the employee-work relationship! Standard notions of economic production do not apply to us! We'll make it up in volume! Buy now!"

      Note that the smaller venture firms are very rarely heard about, until they become big successes. They play their cards right, unlike LittleFeet (next door to us), who burnt through 25 million in just over a year. They had thousands of items of their product, but no market. So I got a laser printer, a torque wrench, and a table for pennies on the dollar at the auction.

      Vive la vulture capital!

    8. Re:Exactly why.... by StormyMonday · · Score: 1
      On a more insightful note do you this was part of the tech bubble or the more recent trend towards corporate corruption?

      They overlap. The "venture capital" death spiral went like this:

      1. Venture capitalist gets a gob of money from investors.
      2. He takes half of it and puts it in his pocket as "fees".
      3. He throws the founding management out and puts in a bunch of his croneys, at grossly inflated salaries.
      4. The new management spends money like water. New buildings. Armies of programmers. Hummers. Point is to create "buzz".
      5. When everybody's talking about the company, go public. Stock price goes through the roof. Everybody gets rich.

      Note that the "product", or other boring things like cash flow, are irrelevant. If the company goes bust at any point, the VC has his profit.

      During the boom, everybody pretty much knew this. However, the possibility of becoming a stock-option millionaire warped a lot of peoples' minds.

      --
      Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
    9. Re:Exactly why.... by UFNinja · · Score: 1
      Yeah but there are better ways to get it then Hummers.
      Indeed. Girlfriends are great for that, all you have to do is ask real nicel. . . oh right, this is /. My bad. ;)
  21. The Hummer by ThogScully · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Hummer has 50,000 miles on it and it's on its second engine. What did they do to that thing?
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
    1. Re:The Hummer by mackman · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know that "Step 2: ???", it usually takes a lot of driving.

    2. Re:The Hummer by jmpvm · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? Thats par for the course for a GM product.

    3. Re:The Hummer by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was probably used to ferry Michael Robertson to and from court...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:The Hummer by first.last · · Score: 1

      blew a gasket

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    5. Re:The Hummer by altamira · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Hummer was designed and built for military use. This does NOT include going 100'000 km a year w/o a visit to your local mechanic, but it includes reliably travelling 150 km over rough terrain at high speed with a broken wheel. AFTER THAT, of course, you'll have to see a mechanic, which - in a military environment - is something you will do every 1000 or so km, or after using the car in the field, whichever comes first... the original Hummer vehicle needed a new set of wheels every 10'000 km, and a new transmission every 40'000 km.

      After all, it was never designed for the average home user...

    6. Re:The Hummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      probably convert from diesel to pump gas - ive seen several where they swapped the 6.2L diesel engine for one that runs on pump gas

    7. Re:The Hummer by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      On the off-chance you're not kidding...

      GM's may not be the best cards, but they last pretty damn long if you maintain them. My enitre family drives GM cars, and they last to about 180,000 to 200,000 miles.

      Any car will break down if not cared for. A friend of mine changes the oil in his 1997 Honda Accord every 6,000 - 7,000 miles ane he wonders why he's having a problem. "Hondas last forever" he exclames, but he hasn't realized he slowly killing the friggin thing.

    8. Re:The Hummer by kabocox · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Hummer has 50,000 miles on it and it's on its second engine. What did they do to that thing?

      Uh, went mudding.

    9. Re:The Hummer by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my owners manual for my Grand Marquis (no, I'm not that old... darnit) it says to change the oil every 6000 miles.

      riiiiight.

      So, I change it every 3. Also, the spark plugs are supposed to be changed out at 100k. Nope, I'll do that at 50k at the very latest, and probably every 30 or 40 after that. I've had 3 cars that supposedly had 100k mile spark plugs in them, but invariably there have been problems (too hot an engine, bad spark plug wires) that screwed up the plugs so bad that even 75k would be pushing the plugs.

      I've owned 4 GM vehicles so far, and now I'm on a Ford kick. One day I might just try those new fangled foreign cars (i.e. honda or maybe even BMW if I get some raises...) and see what all the rage is about. But I'd bet money that they break down just as much.

      Anything that moves will eventually break. Just some things before others.

      --
      Karnal
    10. Re:The Hummer by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question why would any sane person buy the fricking thing if it wasn't what they wanted and have to change the bloody engine, there are lots of perfectly good 4x4 that have at least the option to run on petrol.

      I mean if the owners actually were planning to use these things for anything that a hummer may actually be useful they would definately keep the diesel engine. For instance longer range (fuel efficiency is higher, so X amount of fuel will get you further) very handy for long journeys through remote regions, and fording rivers as diesels don't mind getting wet.

      This further solidifies in my mind that hummer owners are clueless wankers.

    11. Re:The Hummer by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

      I've got a '03 Silverado, and it has an engine oil life monitor that indicates oil life as a percentage (when it gets close to 0, you change the oil). It typically tracks on about 7-8,000 miles between oil changes. This monitor is supposed to be very dynamic based on how the vehicle is driven, i.e., it's probably more likely based on hours at RPM and idle than on mileage. When I change the oil in my truck, it's still in visually good shape after 7,500+ miles.

      Modernly, 3,000 mile oil change intervals are a myth. Most car manufacturers call for them every 7,500 miles or so, but sooner if you drive in dirty conditions. Jiffy Lube and like companies tends to advertise to this myth for the obvious reasons. They want you visiting often so they can deceive you into buying additional services that you don't need (and which they might not even actually perform, anyway).

      Just type "3000 mile oil change myth" into Google if you want some evidence to back this up.

      --
      What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    12. Re:The Hummer by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Which is why hummers aren't used for anything useful by civilians. Any company that wants reliable low maintainance vehicles for off-road work will run a mile from these things.

      5 year ago some guy had the idea of importing hummers to Australia to make ground herbicide spraying rigs out of hummers. Think 8 hours a day, pulling at least 2 tonnes of equipment and water over a rocky, furrrowed uneven paddock at probably 30 km/h or more. Well It didn't fly as the cost of maintaining the thing (especially the cost of parts) was horrendous, and they were not that reliable.

      Another example how the needs of military needs are very different to civilian needs, the auto tyre inflation things the military hummers have, great if the vehicle is shot at deflates a tyre and for obvious reasons the occupants want to floor it out of there, to everyone else its just a piece of complicated, breakage prone and most of the time useless piece of junk. The odd time the vehicle gets a flat there is usually plenty of time to stop and change the tyre.

    13. Re:The Hummer by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      It may be a myth, but have you ever actually changed your own oil?

      I don't pay for someone else to do it, I dedicate some time on a saturday when for when it's around the 3,000 mile mark. Let me tell you, you'd be more enticed to change your oil if you saw how dirty it was a 3,000 miles (hell it's horrid at 5,000).

      I like to take pristine care of my car, so I don't need any major work on it (or need to replace it any time soon). The way I figure it, changing the oil myself is relatively cheap to do and is worth it if it adds even a couple of months of life to your car.

      As for my friend, his record is going 10,000 miles without a change.

  22. Those Dumb Chairs by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1, Funny

    A tad jealous are we? My ass is nice and comfy on an Aeron.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  23. pop up ads by noldrin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, I'm glad those stupid ads that danced over the screen I was trying to look at served some useful purpose for the company.

  24. Those chairs rock by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs"? Those dumb chairs rock. They're extremely adjustable. They're extremely comfortable, and not in a lounging around way, but in a "I could sit here working at my computer for eight hours a day and not grow to loathe my chair" way. They may be expensive, but they're great chairs. Are they worth the price? That's a more personal question. Personally, as soon as I find a moderately priced used one I plan on getting one for my home.

    (Aerons are great chairs, but they have one big weakness: the cheese grater effect. The nylon mesh backing is nice and cool in warm weather, but in the winter when it's tool that mesh shreds sweaters. I ended up putting an old t-shirt over the back of mine at work.)

    1. Re:Those chairs rock by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1
      in the winter when it's tool that mesh shreds sweaters

      I don't get it... do you work outdoors?

    2. Re:Those chairs rock by Astrorunner · · Score: 1

      You can have my Aeron when you pry it off my cold, dead ass. Very nice. Leaves my butt numb a little sometimes -- I'm sure you wanted to know that. I go from this Aeron and a nice ergonomic keyboard and 21" screen, home, to my basement office where I try cranking stuff out while sitting on a wooden folding chair, on a laptop. At least I have a desk for the laptop. I like to think of it as giving my body a workout.

  25. Freaking Stupid Excess by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    No wonder this company couldn't make a profit. They have more freaking workout equipment than the Crush fitness center in lower Manhattan. What the hell does an "Internet Company" need with a washer/dryer, fooseball tables, pool tables, electronic dart boards, more workout equipment than a Manhattan gym, stand up arcade games, massage tables, autographed size 20 sneakers and other non-business related crap? If I were an investor in MP3.com, I would have shoved that autographed size 20 sneaker up some CEO's butt. Outrageous!

    These guys appear to be so wasteful, I bet they used sharpies on whiteboards and just threw them away after each meeting. And we wonder why there was such an Internet bubble and a recession.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Meetings? Why would anyone have meetings? They were running a business.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by deathcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having worked at a startup (that failed!) I'm sure it is much worse than meets the eye. How much did all that eye candy cost after all? I'm sure _ONE_ million dollars would go a long way towards buying all that workout equipment, the Humvee and replacement motor, the washer/drywer, foosball, The Sneaker, those autographed guitars, AND the Aeron chairs. Keep in mind this company found a way to zero HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars and you're not doing that with Pez machines and steel welded mp3.com vanity logos.

    3. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
      They have more freaking workout equipment than the Crush fitness center in lower Manhattan. What the hell does an "Internet Company" need with a washer/dryer, fooseball tables, pool tables, electronic dart boards, more workout equipment than a Manhattan gym, stand up arcade

      If you have a company where employees are putting in 18 hours a day, that does help productivity. By putting some of that on premisis, the employee does not have to go home or go out, then they get to work more. Taking a break for a few foosball games can get you out of a rut.


      Having exercise equiptment on site is a good thing so that it is easier to stay healthy and another way to take a break.

    4. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by toupsie · · Score: 1
      Having exercise equiptment on site is a good thing so that it is easier to stay healthy and another way to take a break

      I think the craptacular performance of MP3.com has shot this theory down. It might make employees happy but it doesn't make them productive. Abuse and threats along praise and raises are the keys to employee productivity and business success, the rest is eye candy.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    5. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      But what about the Hummer and the Fat Boy? Unless they were planning a promotional cross-country tour that they never announced, I can't think of a reason for the Hummer and the Fat Boy.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    6. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot of large corporations do it too. Mine does.

      Happy employees are generally more productive. Employees who have dropped dead of a heart attack are not productive employees (and you often have to pay benefits out). Thus, the theory that spending $100,000 on an exercise room that might make your employees a bit happier and a bit healthier.

    7. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know the MP3.com employees weren't being productive? Perhaps their bosses didn't tell them to, er, do anything...guess you've got to have a product to make before you can complain about productivity.

    8. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Life is more than working 22 hours a day dude. If I can get up and go work out for an hour and then go back to work, it makes me feel better and makes my employer feel really good, since I am back to work sooner.

      Care to lend me some money?

    9. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by toupsie · · Score: 1
      How do you know the MP3.com employees weren't being productive?

      The auctioning of all the MP3 assets so of gave it away...

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    10. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former employee of MP3.com, right up to the end, I do have to tell you that a lot of actual development talk happened in the gym.
      Folks you normally didn't see throughout the day would wind up next to you on the cardio machine, and you'd naturally start talking work stuff.

      That having been said, mostly I just liked the punching bag and scaring the crap out of my co-workers who thought I'd some day go postal on them. :)
      When the bag was finally broken, the steel beams made better noises when punching them anyway.

      But I do have to ask - HUMMER? Heck, I never saw the thing in our parking lot. Was it a perk for the execs or something?

    11. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they don't have the cadre of overly horny homosexual men trying to jump your bones at the drop of the hat (at least if your physique is up to par). I bet that'd cost an extra mil or so. So you can't say they weren't at least trying to save a little money ;).

    12. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting a bit fed up with people here on /. that are actually claiming that Coffee Bars, large office space, nice furniture etc. have no place in the office because they have nothing to do with work. Perhaps you would like to downgrade your current chair, forget the cold water dispenser, work at a smaller desk, and have a more strict dress code.

      There is absolutely NOTHING inherently wrong with having a nice office with luxurious items and some relaxation items, ESPECIALLY if you're a tech person or similar that uses intellectual properties to get your job done. Using your mind is a highly stressful job that needs to be relaxed in order to get things done.

      I'm not familiar with the inner workinds of MP3.com, but most of these places either:
      1) had no legitimate business model
      2) had a good idea but bad business practices
      3) had everything going, but the dot-bomb burst before they shipped the first product and couldn't get funding to continue

      I know of several (not just one or two) companies that started out during the dot-com bubble. They are still around, and although they don't rake in as much money as they used to and aren't the MOST luxurious offices I've seen, they are still doing quite well. They still treat their employees nicely, they have the coffee bar, fooseball, Aeron chairs and what not. They also had flat heads and a good business model, and used their startup capital for just that, and didn't over spend what they shouldn't have.

    13. Re:Freaking Stupid Excess by misaochankun · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be MUCH worse than what you see. The original plan was to have TVs in front of all the equipment so workers could watch TV and work out at the same time, with CABLE no less. They also planned to create a full cafeteria for employees only, some 24 hour thing because we worked all hours. They also intended to install a rock climbing wall and a number of other gaudy things. The work out equipment is not worth it though, we really used that stuff to ne end, so it is all pretty beat up.

  26. I'd hardly call MP3.com a victim of the bubble... by JayBlalock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Except perhaps by being too successful. Remember, at the same time that Napster was grabbing headlines, MP3.com was the legitimate face of the online music biz. They were saying everything that the RIAA didn't want anyone to say, and worse, they were making money at it. (not to mention providing a highly attractive alternative to traditional record contracts) Contracted composers like those hired to do video games found it to be a perfect outlet for releasing music that had an audience, but wouldn't rate an actual CD release. Major groups were even releasing singles on MP3.com and profitting greatly from it.

    Then they got bought out by Vivendi-Universal, and suddenly dropped completely off of the radar, only to be quietly shut down once they were forgotten.

    Hmmmmm.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  27. Hummers? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Forget the hummers, dude. Anyone else see the arcade machines? Galaga, Ms. Packman, Raiden II, Soul Edge...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  28. Re:maybe they sold other things.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its wierd, i had two [somehow] accounts at mp3.com, both using specific-for-that email addresses...MP3.com goes up for sale, and i start getting dating-spam to these two addresses. long live capitalism or something.

  29. Maybe it's me by denofslack · · Score: 1
    I can't help but wonder why mp3.com went under. It could have been the Hummer, or the Harley, or the Aerons -- sure, it could have been a combination of everything.

    But could you really expect anything from a company that can't even tell time.?!?!

    Last I checked, there was only a 3 hour difference between San Diego and NY.

  30. Loads of techie interesting stuff by kbahey · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Some of the stuff is teenage oriented.



    However, if you look at the photos from the link in the article, there is :


    and other goodies for those who live near La Jolla in San Diego.

    1. Re:Loads of techie interesting stuff by Talsin · · Score: 1

      Offhand I would say some sort of NAS, although it might be a small power conditioner. hard to tell from that angle.

    2. Re:Loads of techie interesting stuff by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Sun servers, make a cluster of these. Don't forget this pile either

    3. Re:Loads of techie interesting stuff by lennnnny · · Score: 1

      That's a disk array. Maybe StorageTek 9176, but I'm not sure. 1Gb technology, but probably a good buy for someone.

    4. Re:Loads of techie interesting stuff by thehomeland · · Score: 1

      I was more interested in their Laptop Stockpile. They might be older, but they've gotta be newer than my TI 33mhz laptop that I got on eBay for $30 (works fine).

      Unfortunately, they won't ship any of it to you, you have to go pick it up or arrange for someone to get it for you before a deadline or you lose it even if you paid for it, according to the terms.

  31. Alot of collectibles by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I know this sounds crazy but years from now things from the Internet Boom Era will be serious collectibles.

    Machines from the industrial revolution eras are now priceless. So keep some of these pentiums and .com registration paperwork for your grand kids etc etc.

    1. Re:Alot of collectibles by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Things nowadays aren't as collectable since they're mass produced in such huge quantities. Besides, the money for the item plus storage space would probably be more valuable if invested, and it would also be more readily convertable into cash.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  32. A bunch of stuff! by LoudMusic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What in God's name were they doing with all that computer hardware? It's a website with a database. In a single picture there were several (five?) Sun Enterprise level servers, any one of which could do everything by itself.

    I see two problems.

    A) People have dumb ideas and think "the Internet" and more computers will help them make money.
    B) Some other idiots loan the idiots in problem A more money than is required.

    They've got a bunch of cool stuff though.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:A bunch of stuff! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What in God's name were they doing with all that computer hardware? It's a website with a database. In a single picture there were several (five?) Sun Enterprise level servers, any one of which could do everything by itself.

      In it's heyday MP3.com claimed to have about 100,000 songs in its database. So 100,000 x (4 minutes avg song) x (1MB/min at 128kps mp3) = 400GB. That's just to store the songs.

      Then you have to deliver that content to several million users and maintain their accounts. Also you might want to bill them automatically as they buy instead of sending them a paper bill each month. So you may want to set up a B2B relationship with Visa, MC, Amex, Discover.

      On the web site, you might want to host your own site rather than pay someone to host it for you since your content may change dramatically every day and you may want the most flexibility in terms of control. Also with serveral million users, your bandwidth bill if you pay another company to host may be huge. Hosting your own site may be the way to go.

      Since mp3 is your product, you might want to rip and encode your own rather than get a copy from your brother/neighbor/friend. It would help too to complete the ID3 tags and grab that data from cddb.com or somewhere else.

      Oh, by the way, all those functions above need a backup server just in case. Throw in an email servers, a Windows Domain Controller, a few file and print servers and that only leaves finance, HR, payroll, accounting, marketing, and code development to buy computers and set up infrastructure.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:A bunch of stuff! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What in God's name were they doing with all that computer hardware? It's a website with a database.

      How do employees maintain that website and database? You need workstations. If you have workstation, you need a desk to put it on and a chair to place in front of the desk. And you need office space in which to place all of those.

      And clearly, you need a Hummer to drive yourself from your home to that office! See how it all makes sense?

      Kidding aside, I think you mis-estimate the scope of what is actually needed to run a service such as the one mp3.com used to be. It's not just "a website with a database", it's "a HUGE website with an ENORMOUS database". PHP and MySQL weren't going to cut it for the kind of performance they needed -- enterprise solutions WERE required.

    3. Re:A bunch of stuff! by MKalus · · Score: 1
      What in God's name were they doing with all that computer hardware? It's a website with a database. In a single picture there were several (five?) Sun Enterprise level servers, any one of which could do everything by itself.


      One word: Redundancey.

      Second: You don't want to cluster a fucking huge database and a webserver etc. together, you split it up.

      You most likely want to have more than ONE web and db server (again redundancy).

      Then you're talking about Storage for all the MP3 files, so you add a disk array or two.

      And if you're really paranoid: You build it all over again on the other side of the country.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    4. Re:A bunch of stuff! by tedtimmons · · Score: 1

      100k songs? You're off by a factor of ten, at least.

      MP3.com passed the million-song mark long before they went belly-up. I think they may have had around 2M, but I've forgotten.

      And grabbing the data from CDDB would be illegal, unless we paid them for it :-)

      You're forgetting a customer database, log tracking, login servers, download servers (streaming downloads eat up Apache), etc.

    5. Re:A bunch of stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoudMusic - clearly you have no clue just how extensive the database was.
      The customer database (which stored username+password for every account created - EVER) kept one of those nice big Sun systems loaded down.
      Then there were a couple of backup machines for that.
      And then there were the numerous machines for storing the actual *catalog*.

    6. Re:A bunch of stuff! by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      If you've ever read about how iTunes or the new Napster works you'd understand they needed all that. Keep in mind mp3 files are oftentimes larger than 3 megabytes and that a lot of people are accessing them. Something of that scale eats up a massive amount of storage space and bandwidth. It's not just serving up text and a few images and flash animations. The majority of files being transferred from the server are over a megabyte, and this is being repeated everytime one of the thousands of users downloads a tune.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    7. Re:A bunch of stuff! by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      So 100,000 x (4 minutes avg song) x (1MB/min at 128kps mp3) = 400GB. That's just to store the songs.

      50 feet away from me (30 ft down, 20 over) is a multi-terabyte fully redundant fibre controlled storage system and the set of database servers and web servers it feeds. The entire system takes up one rack. And web hits come back in under a tenth of a second, and we've never been able to get enough clients together to give it a full-to-the-breaking-point stress test.

      And the equipment that I saw, just that which was photographed, easily takes up 10 times the space.

      Ahh to live in the days when the easiest solution was just to order another server...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  33. nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not part of anti-slash. stop being a paranoid dumbass.

    -jp

  34. It's a shame. by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an artist that had music offered on MP3.com, I am very disappointed that MP3.com died. It's very sad, really. I've listened to bands for the first time on MP3.com which I later went out to buy a CD of. The people who suffer most from this failure is the underground music scene. The ability to get your sound out to a large audience was really a good thing for both the artists (free distro, big audience) and the listeners (free songs from a wide variety of music). All my favorite bands (MeWithoutYou, Nina Pinta and the Santa Maria, Zao, etc.) had a few free songs offered on MP3.com, and it was great if you ever wanted to show someone else some cool band. If MP3.com closed because of lawsuits, it's likely partly because major labels (or corps like ClearView) felt threatened by the ability to hear any new band out there from any musical style without being controlled by the major labels. And the idea of free AND legal music downloading must have been horrible to them. As far as those people who want to control my freedom to express myself to a large audience and to support talented bands without having to pay a large record label (most of the bands are on indie labels, if any label), I hope they rot in AO*cough*L.

    1. Re:It's a shame. by maliabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i would like to ask if there is another channel (maybe MP3-UG.com?) for these underground music to continue their distribution and people to download them legally?

    2. Re:It's a shame. by christowang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      purevolume.com has become pretty popular, even though their flash player is horrid.

  35. Tornado Foosball Table by md17 · · Score: 1

    You all may laugh, but I seriously want this thing There is nothing like a Tornado table.

    1. Re:Tornado Foosball Table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you speak the truth, md17. The tornado table is the bomb.

      You can tell how much use it's seen by the color of the handles (not a lot on this one). Interesting that they got the score beads set up bar style. I wonder if there was just a few people who were jonesing for the fooseball, or if it was brought in and set up by a service?

      Either way, don't bother to bid too high. You can buy yourself a new one for $1000. That was the price in '96 anyway, when my fraternity got one.

    2. Re:Tornado Foosball Table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry it's crap. the corner's aren't even ramped so you can get the ball stuck.

      it is a low end table. give me a real one and we'll talk.

  36. DUMB AERON CHAIRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    Being an industrial designer myself I can say that professionally speaking, Aeron chairs are probably the best designed ergonomic chairs in existance. Of course, Herman Miller does sell other exquisite chairs, but nothing else in itself can compare to what the Aeron offers. I do not work for Herman Miller, but I studied quite a bit in human factors in college (for design).

  37. I fit when I was 23 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    I tried one of those at a used furniture store recently. I was too damned fat for it. Like everything else of the dot-com era, it seemed geared around hyper 23-year-olds.

    1. Re:I fit when I was 23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      maybe you should lose some weight? i dont know of many chairs that are designed for fatasses.

    2. Re:I fit when I was 23 by mwynne24 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Aeron chairs come in different sizes. They range of A to B to C. You might have been sitting in an A size chair which would explain how small it was. I have a pair of the B's at home and absolutely love them. Mark.

    3. Re:I fit when I was 23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, obviously the problem here is with the chair.

  38. Re:I'd hardly call MP3.com a victim of the bubble. by ThePretender · · Score: 1

    But now what happened? Are these same people who were making money from putting music there doing so elsewhere? Is there a similar model? I posed the question in the form of a rejected Ask Slashdot submission a while back: Where are people who used to put their music on mp3.com putting it now? Is anybody making money doing so?

  39. Re:I'd hardly call MP3.com a victim of the bubble. by tedtimmons · · Score: 1

    Too successful? At what? Giving away bandwidth and disk space?

    MP3.com desperately needed to get rid of the crap. Allowing people to freely upload music wasn't a good idea- you get a lot of crap that nobody cares about, including the person who uploaded it.

    Maybe charging $50/year would have cut the 80% of music that was such crap.

  40. Maybe not last bubble by maliabu · · Score: 1

    if they can get big money out of this auction (probably indicating people are bidding on their MP3.com-pre-owned 'sentimental' values), maybe it itself is not the last dotcom bubble yet.

    by the way i almost didn't click on the URL because it says cow..anal..

    1. Re:Maybe not last bubble by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as someone pointed out earlier, a dash goes a long way to helping URL readability. Another one with a similar problem in the past was experts-exchange.com. (A really useful IT-code-hardware tip site, BTW) They used to go by the domain name of expertsexchange.com, which has just a wee bit different connotation. :-)

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  41. dumb herman miller chairs? by hopstah · · Score: 1

    come on! i work for herman miller, those chairs are sweet! best office chair ever!

  42. MP3 Independent Artists alive and well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The MP3 Independent Artist database continues to be maintained by Trusonic.com which was a business subsidiary of MP3.com. Many of the artists granted permission to transfer their material to that business and therefore it has not been lost as widely reported.

    The Independent Artists enrolled in the Trusonic music and messaging programs are receiving regular royalty checks.

  43. Water Bottle by Plocmstart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does the Hummer come with the plastic water bottle between the driver's seat and the console? You can keep the Hummer... I just want the water bottle...

  44. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd like to think that the handwriting was on the wall...
    Minor nit pick - this is one of those "I could care less" (you could? Then you do care?) or "We're going to go through it with a fine toothcomb" (what's a toothcomb? A comb for teeth?) things.

    It's either "the hand writing (...) on the wall" (ie you're refering to the hand itself, doing the writing) or "the writing (...) on the wall" (ie refering to the writing itself, the text on the wall.) It's not "the handwriting on the wall" (which would be refering to the style. That's a bit like saying "The italic on the wall" or "The red on the wall".)

    Anyway, it's a pet peeve, I thought I'd mention it.

  45. Focus! Focus! by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of that high-end equipment and no one knows how to focus a camera? Even a digital Camera?

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Focus! Focus! by misaochankun · · Score: 1

      All the people that could figure out the camera were layed off before they took the pictures...

  46. Re:I'd hardly call MP3.com a victim of the bubble. by JayBlalock · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well, that's the problem. Mp3.com, by being the first to do this, had the lion's share of the market. Once it got bought out (and ignored), it completely splintered the "industry." So there are a whole lot of little upstarts doing variations on the model, but all of them are so tiny as to present no real threat to the Big 5 at all.

    From a pure strategic standpoint, the move was brilliant. One large cash layout, and your only major competition is crushed, divided, and made irrelevant. From every OTHER standpoint, it was abhorrant. (especially in effectively stalling out any consumer-driven progression in the music industry for years)

    My personal favorite alternative (which I have no problem plugging) is Magnatune. You're free to listen to the entirety of their collection via streaming MP3, your licensed with permission to share the files, and prices are negotiable. If you want to buy an album, you can select how much you pay from $1-$20, based on what you think the album is worth.

    It's a truly ambitious model, and amazingly, they seem to be doing OK so far on the small scale. But can they move out of a 'niche' market? I doubt it.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  47. Lots of computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    MP3.com handled 1.2 megabits per second of traffic during the peak of the day and never got below 300/400 megabits per second. This translates to the delivery of over 3 Terabytes of music in a month to the community.

    MP3.com also served up over 5 million page views per day and had over 2 million media files and 250,000 artists.

    MP3.com provided daily statistics to all of the artists and updated several hundred charts in over 300 genres of music on a daily basis.

    All of this was done reliably. MP3.com was one of the faster web sites on the Internet.

    Speed and scale requires a distributed computing solution which is exacltly what MP3.com pretty bright engineering team built. Everything was replicated and built in clusters. Distribution tools were automated so that everything remained in sync and operational metrics were extremely detailed.

    A lot of the people at MP3.com did a terrific job, some made some important legal errors.

    1. Re:Lots of computers by sahonen · · Score: 1

      In short: We're talking more traffic than Slashdot here.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    2. Re:Lots of computers by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they made what I would consider a legal "error", I think someone just took a long shot and it didn't pan out. To me, it seemed obvious from the beginning that they were violating mechanical rights when they digitized the commercial CD collection. I always assumed that someone was hoping for the slim chance that the courts would rule digital duplication to somehow be different than other forms of copying.

  48. I have to wonder by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
    I have to wonder about a music "company" that would go and purchase a Harley considering you can't hear yourself think on one of them, let alone listen to anything

    Perhaps it was the CEO's way of escaping the noise of crashing stock prices?

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

  49. Scraps by ManuelKelly · · Score: 1

    From the pictures, it looks like most of the good stuff is already gone. Most of the racks only have a couple of pieces of equipment in them. I cannot believe all of that rackspace was for future growth.

  50. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by iiioxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A coporation might stand out with a Tempest machine, but I think if I were interviewing with a firm and I saw Galaga & Ms. Pacman, I'd like to think that the handwriting was on the wall...

    Frankly, if you interview for a position with a company and they show you *any* video games (or other dot-com trappings such as a "coffee bar") and tout them as employee benefits, I think it should serve as a red flag. Those kind of amenities are there for one reason: to convince employees to work for a company that they would normally run the hell away from. It's almost always compensation for some other business shortcomings (i.e. excruciatingly long hours, zero job security, a paper-thin business model, etc).

    "I work 80 hour weeks, no overtime, the phones went out for 4 hours yesterday because we didn't pay the bill... but we've got free video games and lattes in the break room, and my boss is so cool, he drives a Hummer. This place is great!"

    You know what? Just give me a boring old cube, a desk, a decent computer, and a steady paycheck with a company where I don't lie awake at night wondering if the doors will be open when I get there tomorrow. Oh, and some old curmudgeon of a boss who's been in business for 20 years and actually knows how to run a company.

  51. gym.MP3.com by CrazyClimber · · Score: 1
    Some enterprising individual could start up his/her own gym with all of the exercise equipment.

    http://www.cowanalexander.com/Events/CA031004/PV 2/IMG/IMG_0071.JPG

    http://www.cowanalexander.com/ Events/CA031004/PV2/IMG/IMG_0077.JPG

  52. Deserved to go bust! by 1s44c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some companies just deserve to go bust. It's amazing they lasted as long as they did if thats the kind of crap they spent money on.

    I mean really, does any company need giant lava lamps and stupid toys.

    And how could they ever justify buying a harley?

  53. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    No way, man, Joust! Wizard of War. Dig Dug. Marble Madness. If you want difficult games, go for Lunar Lander or Gravitar.

    Oh, and don't forget Sinistar. "Run, Coward!"

    Why anyone would want a frickin' foosball table is quite beyond me. Pool table, sure. _Maybe_ air hockey.

    If you wanted to _really_ stand out with an old school arcade game, get "I, Robot."

    Sorry, folks, "-1, Nostalgia" in progress. Move along...

  54. Spoken like a tard who never tried an Aeron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  55. Succesful until the end by autocracy · · Score: 1
    Taken from the perspective of "smart business," yeah - MP3 was kinda stupid. The health club, the Hummer (though somebody pointed out that might have been from another instance and just lumped with the auction)... wasteful expenses for a business to make.

    Opposingly (and dragging info again from another post), MP3.com's original capital investment was nearly the same as the amount of money they paid out in lawsuits... and they were still valued higher than their capital rating when Vivendi bought them out. They might not have had the most business-savy executives, but they didn't run it into the ground like the rest of the .coms. I think Vivendi had more of a hand to play in that.

    --
    SIG: HUP
  56. No wonder they are gone. They can't tell time! by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 1

    Seriously - I know they were mp3.com and I know what all they did. I actually thought it was quite cool. But besides the Aeron chairs giving away their inept ways, this picture is the most damning. Look, folks, if it is 11:52 in San Diego, it is NOT 3:52 in New York. It would be 2:52. And it SURE as hell is not 10:52 in Paris! Things like that just point out the sheer arrogance of a company in my book.

    1. Re:No wonder they are gone. They can't tell time! by dman123 · · Score: 1
      See the guy in the pink/red shirt? He just finished changing NYC from EST to EDT. Now he's walking over to SD to change that one too but the woman in maroon? (too dark to see clearly) stopped him for a chat.

      What about Paris? (insert surrender joke here)

      But seriously, is it worth the time to take a picture of three clocks and try to sell them? I assume they will bundle those into Lot #54 - Tons of Cheap Office Junk.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  57. that desk! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's a desk from BioMorph. If you have an Aeron chair, you need the Herman-Miller of desks to go along with it, which would be BioMorph. Seriously nice desks, with the attendant pricetag. *sigh*

  58. Actually by emkman · · Score: 1

    The founder isnt in jail, but he is being sued by Microsoft. Ever heard of Lindows? Besides, alot of other companies during the dot com bubble wasted alot more capital. Theres only 1 hummer and 1 harley, and Im not being sarcastic when I say only 1.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  59. Get over the post-bubble snobbery by maggard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For those with short memories in the bubble offering things like great chairs, good food, and in-house diversions was good sense. You were competing with every other employer in the over-heated market and that sort of stuff was just plain expected.

    Indeed, frankly, a lot of it is still justifiable.

    A good chair means that 100k/year coder is gonna be able to work out their inspiration without the distractions of an aching back or sticky ass. For a $500 more then the standard office crap-chair that's a good investment, especially as a capital depreciation and defense in an bad-ergo disability suite.

    Similar for food, drink, and toys. It keeps the crew in the building, talking to each other. It means they're not taking their hour off to troop to the local lunch hole where they'll be sitting at the table next to the competition spilling your plans. Figure $arcade-game = $day-at-teamwork-camp, not a bad value amortized.

    Furthermore it's amazing the kinda allegiance baubles and amenities like that will buy. I've seen folks turn down 30% larger paychecks for a trendy office space, free fruit juice, and a tres kewl atmosphere. Multiply that by a full of staff and per-person it comes down to a great value with the improved recruiting and retention, costs a fraction the headhunter, interview, and training costs.

    Lastly, cars and motorcycles? Promo costs. Tax code is nice to 'em and they get your name out there. Check around your current employer and you'll probably be amazed at some of the trophies and gifts and banners and other paraphernalia that they're purchasing as a matter of course.

    Particularly for .com's half of the "product" was name and buzz, scoring the next VC round. Flashy toys things were standard, indeed de rigeur. Getting an article in the local paper, your logo shown at a rave, instant PR and cheap at the price. It's easy to be snide afterwards but then those were the rules of the game and what got you your paycheck, sensible or not.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Get over the post-bubble snobbery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, what company were you CEO of, and when was it mentioned on farkedcompany.com? I eagerly await your reply while you are on your private jet.

    2. Re:Get over the post-bubble snobbery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100k a year coder? Guess you havent noticed the going rate is $7-$10 an hour these days. not to mention the $3 and hour (and less) jobs you sometimes see on f**kthatjob.com.

  60. DotCom Hummer by Samus · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing a hummer on the road with some educational dotcom's logo painted all over it about 2 years ago. When I got home and checked out the site it had been turned into a porn site. I wonder how many failed dotcom domains were bought up by guys looking to make a few bucks by throwing up a page filled with porn banners.

    --
    In Republican America phones tap you.
  61. Pictures by dot_borg · · Score: 1

    I love how all the Hummer photos are out of focus.

  62. Digital Camera by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to get my hands on the camera that took the pictures of the Hummer.

    Not one freaking clear picture, that's got to be a record of some sort.

  63. Padding by FATMOUSE · · Score: 0

    I have found this "Aeron Chair Padding," when shredded, makes excellent bedding. FATMOUSE is well-pleased.

    Now I will retire for my evening nap. I expect nut clusters when I awaken, thin, pathetic thing.

  64. Not for everyone.. by slashkitty · · Score: 1

    Uhm, I had one at my desk and did not like it. I like to feel cozy fabric instead of that plastic feel that you get in this chair. Granted, I don't like leather pants either. If those are for you, you should try this chair.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
  65. dot com ponzi schemes by mabu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People don't realize that most of the early dot coms were basically Ponzi Schemes.

    You look at these pictures of perverse excess and luxury that seemingly had little to do with their business model but you are ignoring the fact that "appearing" to be wildly successful to the point of wasteful spending was THE most substantive part of these companies' business models.

    The scheme involved inflating the value and impression of the company long enough to snag another greedy investor or corporation and then hand the mess off to them. It was inevitable that at some point, the pyramid scheme would collapse in on itself. The trick is to just make sure you get out before it does, or more appropriately, make sure you're not stupid enough to let your sense of greed lull you into believing any of these people know what they're doing.

    When I see things like this, it makes it a lot easier for me to live with myself knowing that while I could have over-hyped my dot-com and made a bundle, it was not the right thing to do, even though I admit that any individual or company dumb enough to purchase or pump capital into a business with no tangible revenue stream deserves to get ripped off.

    1. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by Aneirin · · Score: 1

      Throwing out obscure termonology doesn't make your case. Before putting MP3.com on the level of the Phantom Game Console (saying the CEOs are crooks only trying to exploit venture capitol), you should look at what they are doing. Unlike the other companies in this field (sharing music), they were LEGAL. Also any of their customers will most likely tell you that their service was stable and punctual (in terms of updates etc). Aside from that, rather than attempting to exploit people for lots of money in subscription fees, this company gave indie bands a chance. Indie bands had no way to for FREE reach such a broad audience. If you are looking for crooks try going after the RIAA monopoly.

    2. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by mabu · · Score: 1

      Before putting MP3.com on the level of the Phantom Game Console (saying the CEOs are crooks only trying to exploit venture capitol), you should look at what they are doing

      Ha ha. Someone exploiting venture capitalists? That's like a dog trying to exploit Purina. VCs are in the risk business and are all about exploitation.

      MP3.COM is not necessarily the best example of the dot-com-ponzi-scheme, but it still applies. Like most of the early dot-coms, someone has what appears to be a good idea, but somewhere along the way, the "financial types" take over and morph the company from an honest venture into a shell company for living the high life. This is what happened to MP3.com as well as most of the others.

      Interestingly enough, I purchased a rackmount server from eBay a few years back and was quite amused to find the tag, "property of etoys.com" on it. A nice artifact from the era of dot-com-greed, where tech people were promised hummers and videogames in return for playing alone with crooked, greedy financial vultures.

      I don't have any doubt there were some sincere principals involved in MP3.com early on, but they sold their souls to corporate greed. I can't say that it's evil to do so; it's more sad than anything else because that's the way you cross to the "next level" in the big business world unfortunately. What is most appalling about the dot-com boom is how many people suspended their common sense.

    3. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      VCs are in the risk business and are all about exploitation.

      What utter hippie bullshit.

      I'm sure in hippie geek land folks would regularly eschew solid investments in established publicly traded companies with years of proven and audited financial results to invest in your harebrained schemes to sell books over the internet, but in the real world, people don't like putting their money in folks hands for a share of a business that is little more than business plan in a pretty binder. VC's use their knowledge to try to identify the rare combination of good business plan with good business people, then invest large sums of money to help "founders" get their ideas off the ground when the founders lack the hundreds of thousands (or even millions) required to get their ideas roling. The mantra was "get big fast" because like lots of great ideas, once someone saw your idea, it was easy to copy, and if you had only attracted a couple thousand people to your site so far, the other guy could accelerate right past you; after a year even those first thousand would realize you had the idea first.

      Sure, there was a period when some VC's got richer, though most turned around and plowed it right back into new companies. But the VC's weren't the evil AOL Ad exec's, demanding 50% of a startup's funding; They weren't the Stock promoters yelling buy buy buy when a company couldn't possibly justify the price outside some "New Economy" voodoo. They weren't business school drop-out and two-bit hucksters who decided they wanted to get rich off the whole DotCom scam, who hired freinds into VP jobs they weren't qualified for, who took management off-sites to exotic locations so they could "think outside the box". They didn't tell ordinary people to mortgage their houses to buy more stock in BBQs.com. They worst thing they did was encourage companies to stay in the incestuous Silicon Valley area because they thought the networking was worthwhile, and thats where the real skills were. Most of them were "drinking the Kool-Aid", if they gave bad advice it was because thats what they believed was the right thing to do, not because they were involved in a high tech scam. They were already rich.

      Yeah, our VC's are blaming other people for their mistakes now. They shut down other people's DotCom's so they could stem the bleeding, They blamed the CEO for stuff they told him to do then fired him. But he did plenty on his own, and on his way out his concern wasn't our well being, it was "How do I get as big a settlement as I can?" When the time came, our VC's sacraficed to keep us afloat.

      So lay off the VC's. They are still out there investing in start ups, which keeps programers from having to take jobs pushing computers at the local Wal*mart.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    4. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by mabu · · Score: 1

      What utter hippie bullshit.

      I've dealt with at least a dozen major VC firms in the last 15 years. I'm not maligning them. Don't act so insecure, reactive or defensive. Whatever issues you have aren't relative to this discussion. I never blamed VCs in the first place so pay attention Mr. Yippie.

      The problem is GREED and lack of common sense. Kind of like the same lack of common sense that leads someone such as yourself to say "utter hippie bullshit". Let me fill you in on another hippie BS concept: RTFM before you go off defending something that wasn't the object of the discussion in the first place.

    5. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1
      They weren't the Stock promoters yelling buy buy buy when a company couldn't possibly justify the price outside some "New Economy" voodoo. They weren't business school drop-out and two-bit hucksters who decided they wanted to get rich off the whole DotCom scam, who hired freinds into VP jobs they weren't qualified for, who took management off-sites to exotic locations so they could "think outside the box".
      Er, that just about sums up the dot com boom for me!
    6. Re:dot com ponzi schemes by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      And my point is the VC's generally didn't do what they did out of GREED. Yes, they invest money in startups with the hope that over all they will get more back than they put in. To quote:

      Someone exploiting venture capitalists? That's like a dog trying to exploit Purina. VCs are in the risk business and are all about exploitation

      The use of the word exploitation, and your failure to differentiate "financial types" from VC's, which you still haven't done. You seem to be implying that VC's are exploiters, like pimps trawling the bus stations for desparate vulnrable women.

      The tone I am still picking up from you is that VC's should give folks lots of money to try to make their dreams come true, then stay out of it. If the company is successful, they should be happy to get their original investment back, and if the startup owner feels generous, maybe a little extra for their trouble. Sorry, in my mind thats 60's era Hippie ideaology, that other people's resourses should be free for their use, and they should not expect compensation beyond love and appreciation.

      If this isn't your premise, then perhaps you should learn to express your ideas clearly, instead of rambling from subject to subject without letting your audiene know the subject has shifted. Why the stupid yet nasty throwaway line about VC's if they weren't the subject of your tirade about greed?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  66. the hell you smoking, junior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my family had two gm suburbans. got rid of the first after 300,000 miles (origional engine) because the body was full of rust holes and the break system and suspension wern't trustworty enough for our lives. the second died because i was driving it and my mom neglected to tell me that there were problems with the oil pressure and i locked up the engine. (what 17 year old kid checks those gages anyway)

    1. Re:the hell you smoking, junior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a fucking liar.

  67. MP3.com personal music streams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The irony of MP3.com in their era was that they were the only ones at least trying to following the rules. The system they had for streaming your personal music collection was invaluable. All I had to do was verify my collection (a minor nuissance, but seemed perfectly reasonable to prevent infringement), then I could listen to my music anywhere!

    This was a really cool feature and enabled me access to my 100+ CD's from any net connection. If only the RIAA gave a damn about improving life for consumers. An innovative company who stepped in to an empty market with great ideas is now being evicerated on the auction block.

    Now we have DRM and the new Naptser, "cheap" $13 CD's, DRM iTunes, blech.

    Were it not for copyright capitalism might be healthy... Instead all we have is oligopolies all over the fucking place thanks in part to intellectual property.

  68. German equivalent to the Aeron Chair by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    And also good for your spine:

    http://www.swopper.de/

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:German equivalent to the Aeron Chair by Punchinello · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. This medieval torture device has no back support at all, is unstable and caused me to be unable to stand after using it for less than an hour.

      Mod me a troll but don't say I didn't warn you.

      --

      Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  69. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but when I interviewed at Microsoft in '96 they had the video games and the free stuff in the break room--and they made it a selling point. I don't think anybody was worrying that they'd be out of business.

  70. Next up.. by 1s44c · · Score: 1


    Who wants to buy a part of SCO ?

    They should be shutting up shop any time now.

  71. I have a pair of D's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, actually my wife does and I love them also. They are cushy and comfortable and cute to boot. They have less knobs than the Aeron but I don't think it hurts their versatility or usefullness.

    1. Re:I have a pair of D's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plus i bet they clean up nicely after a spill.

  72. they'll all be wiped by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But if these machines have hard drivers still hooked up, then there might be lots of interesting stuff lying around on those (maybe mp3s too!)

    Well, since professional IT people clean hard drives before they give them away...uh, no. Do you seriously think they're that stupid?

    They may not be able to focus a camera to save their lives(it's so bad, you'd almost think it was intentional), but I strongly suspect every drive has been completely(for all practical purposes) wiped clean, and I mean more than just "zap the partition table". Further, I guarantee the music files were the least of their concerns. Financials, emails, etc...

    Speaking of the photos, did anyone else notice a lot of the photos(harley, Hummer) were very obviously on someone's private property, and further, were rather lacking in mp3.com logos? Someone was getting some free vehicles for personal use on the company dime.

    1. Re:they'll all be wiped by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Someone was getting some free vehicles for personal use on the company dime.

      Very common. Heck, I know people who's companies own their house. One guy I race with -- his company owns the Viper he races in.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  73. Slashdot: Home of the eye-rolling uptight morons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "THOSE DUMB AERON CHAIRS *eye-roll* HURR HURR HURR"

    The geek then put down his energy drink to go bother his officemate about how much he really needed to install Firefox.

  74. I tried that. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately they died as well. At least I didn't bother staying until I had an opportunity to move out instead of up. It was a great first job on my resume until the fiasco, luckily for me I departed a few years before the shit hit the fan.

    Working for myself is excellent. My boss isn't bad, the pay is good, the hours are a bit much but that is my choosing, and the only person I have to rely on for security is myself!

  75. So didja have time by StringBlade · · Score: 3, Interesting
    to play all the arcade games there?

    Not to mention the pool table and dart board. And were the games so exhausting that you needed to do your laundry at work (what's with the washing machine and dryer)? =^)

    Seriously though...what was it like working there? Inquiring minds want to know...

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:So didja have time by tedtimmons · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wasn't really into playing the arcade games and such. But some people were. Like most workplaces, there was a big spread: the majority of the employees would just play the arcade games occasionally. But there were one or two that seemed to do nothing else but play the games. Ditto with the rest of the games, pingpong, etc.

      Laundry- that was locked in a closet, and was used for washing the towels from the exercise area. They'd planned on putting in a gym for a long time, and when they finally did, we couldn't justify the cost. So we shared it with another local company.

      Working at MP3.com was pretty cool. Young, driven individuals (mostly male and single, no surprise there). I maintain that MP3.com died because it lacked a cohesive business plan- but the software engineering was top-notch.

      MP3 had a lot of the dot-com things (nerf guns, aeron chairs, free soda), but there were some pretty legitimate things going on too.

    2. Re:So didja have time by tedtimmons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, things I forgot:

      Most of the fancy furniture and stuff was in the tech building. The business, HR, legal, and music types were in the building next door, and it wasn't dressed up quite as much. It still had some pretty cool things in it, though.

      The techs were in 1-, 2- and 3-person offices. This was very nice, compared to cubes. I miss it. Some of the higher-ups had argued and managed to get those for us. I miss the care of employees that the whole tech organization had- it certainly helped motivate employees, or at least keep them from being demotivated (read Good to Great).. a lot of time was put into making sure the techies were kept happy, even through low-buck things.

    3. Re:So didja have time by MattRog · · Score: 1

      Would you mind dropping me an email? I interviewed for a position there late 2001 and wondered about some people. Thanks!

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
  76. Aeron chairs by uncadonna · · Score: 1

    Aeron chairs are worth every penny if your job involves 1) sitting and 2) concentrating. But keep on mocking them so I can get a good price on one.

    --
    mt
    1. Re:Aeron chairs by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Where I work, EVERYONE has an Aeron. Bigger people like me get a bigger size chair.

  77. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had a Dig Dug, they would still be in business :)

  78. Company dime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, folks, this kind of excess is certainly not limited to dotcom startups. Go to a nice vacation spot. Go out to dinner. There they are, a posse of execs, living it up, talking about that chip-in from off of the fourteenth green from earlier in the day. Think that's coming out of their pockets? No fucking way. That's on the shareholders dime.

    Kozlowski got into a heap of trouble over that birthday party he threw for his wife on some Mediterranean island, but believe me, shareholders are getting bilked on a consistent basis by a lot of arrogant twats.

  79. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Those kind of amenities are there for one reason: to convince employees to work for a company that they would normally run the hell away from.

    Wrong. The company I work for (for almost 11 years) has a pool table and dart board in the staff area. They weren't here when I started, and if they were suddenly removed, nobody here would quit.

    It's almost always compensation for some other business shortcomings (i.e. excruciatingly long hours, zero job security, a paper-thin business model, etc).

    We've been in business for over 15 years, everybody here works 8-5 (or 8-4:30, if you only take 1/2 hour for lunch, instead of a full hour) Job security isn't an issue (with the exception of one salesguy, everybody has been here for longer than 5 years), and our business model is pretty good.

  80. They Laughed At Einstein by meehawl · · Score: 1

    All of which says a good deal more about them than about you.

    They laughed at Einstein...
    They laughed at the Wright Brothers...
    But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:They Laughed At Einstein by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ah! But Bozo didn't mind being laughed at. :)

      KFG

    2. Re:They Laughed At Einstein by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Well, that completely demolishes the argument. :-)

    3. Re:They Laughed At Einstein by kfg · · Score: 1

      Why yes, since we're dealing with issues of fashion and personal appearance and not testable scientific veractiy, yes it does. :)

      KFG

  81. Same as Mpls Federal Reserve "sale" by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the Minneapolis offices of the Federal Reserve moved, they opened up the building and had a furniture/office junk sale. A friend and I went down there simply for the opportunity to wander through a landmark modern building that had been otherwise closed to the public -- you could even trapse through the vaults and marvel at the bulletproof glass in the cash loading areas, etc.

    Anyway, they were selling a bunch of junk office stuff for astronomical prices. It was amazing to see what they were charging. I couldn't get anyone to give me a price on the raised flooring system in one of the data centers, either...

    They didn't open the *whole* building officially, but we figured out pretty easily how to get to the roof (unlocked access door, had heliport). I regret to this day not stealing the sign from the door to the top-floor weapons range -- yes, there was a gun range on the top floor with a great large engraved sign that said something like "FIREARMS TRAINING FACILITY, AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY. EYE AND EAR PROTECTION REQUIRED."

    My guess is that any time you have a bunch of "DEALS", you get the class of idiot that's pennywise pound-foolish and willing to pay $1 less for used than new even if it's otherwise inferior. These people always end up paying *just* under new retail for used, and are attracted to "auctions" and "surplus sales" like flies to shit and will always drive up prices.

    1. Re:Same as Mpls Federal Reserve "sale" by rodgster · · Score: 1

      I've personally seen people (cowan alexander auction) pay more for used stuff without a warranty than you could buy it new (with warranty).

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
  82. You fucking retard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should be sitting on a large pillow instead of a fucking OFFICE CHAIR if you sit cross-legged.

    Fucking faggot idiot brain retard dumbass.

  83. worth whose money? by rbird76 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand that you like the chairs. I spend more than I should on fancy pens, and one can reasonably argue that they're not the smartest thing for me to spend my money on. On the other hand, it is MY MONEY (at least until it goes for taxes, my gf, etc.)

    The problem isn't that any of these items such as the Herman Miller chairs, the Hummers (although I could be convinced on that one...) or the Harleys aren't good, but that they're bought with someone else's money. Like the Tyco and Enron folks now, the dot-com people spent their investors' money as if it was given for their personal enjoyment rather than to fund a business intended to succeed. Items such as the above are good products, but their costs to individuals are not in most cases worth the benefits to the individuals. On the other hand, things like this are good if the money is someone else's; then the only comparison required is whether you could buy something else with which you would be happier with the money.

    Bottom line - if these items are worth your money, buying them makes sense. If it isn't worth your own money to buy them, however, than it certainly isn't the job of your investors or companies to buy them for you, and they are ultimately counterproductive to the missions those people intended to achieve (because the money could almost certainly be used for things more likely to achieve their ends). When companies buy these things, someone else almost certain got ripped off to buy them - whether it is their customers, investors, or others in the company. Their presence says that the people running the show treat other people's money as their own personal piggy bank, and such people aren't to be trusted (at least not with my money).

    1. Re:worth whose money? by catch23 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree... the reason we have herman miller chairs at our company is because our company wants to prove that they care for their employees. And my company isn't even a dotcom, it's a huge hotel group company that owns chains of hotels such as Holiday Inn, Crowne Plaza, etc. Everyone in the entire company has these chairs including the security officer at the bottom level and all the secretaries, programmers, and marketing people. I was there when they made the switch to Aeron chairs in fact. They used fabric chairs before the Aeron, but even the fabric chairs weren't cheap.... they were perhaps $150 cheaper than the Aerons so I guess the company decided that the $150 adjustment per chair wasn't so bad.

    2. Re:worth whose money? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a division of Tyco, and I had the shittiest chair on the planet. (Don't get me started on my computer.) But the company I worked for made honest money... too bad about what happened to that money.

      Still, those look like some slick chairs.

    3. Re:worth whose money? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, certainly on utterly pointless crap like Hummers. However, given the other facilities costs, it has always amazed me what crap furniture gets placed in offices. If I spend five minutes per day arguing with my furniture or even one extra trip to the watercooler to stretch from poor ergonomics, that adds up quickly. At my last job, my space, which was 12'x8', cost $3500 per month in facilities charges. Over five years, that's $210,000. In an office of 40 people, over five years, that's $8,000,000 and this was in a pretty spartan place, the armrests on my chair fell of at least once a day for godssake, albeit sitting on some of the most expensive real estate known to man.

      In that office, one minute per day per employee, whether lost or gained, was worth 173 hours of labor, or about $4,160 per year. Fifteen minutes per day lost or gained would equal $780,000, or about $20,000 per employee, which is less than one percent of the facilities budget. Three percent productivity or one percent of the facilities budget. The only guarantee is that you'll spend the money somewhere. The only difference is which account takes the hit for it.

      Since ergonomics is largely a game of speculation as far as the MBAs are concerned, it is my suspicion that most businesses figure they'll go on the cheap and just fire people for low productivity, which is stupid, because turnover is far more costly than furniture and complimentary coffee.

      That said, the biggest mistake most businesses make is in their choice of real estate as everything else is relative to that. Someone gets VC and all of a sudden they're moving into a 10,000 square feet at $80 per... want to know where all your dot com investent money went? Ask Trizec, not Herman Miller.

  84. Y2K bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else notice the calendar on the left side of the auction site has months labeled "February 104" "March 104" etc.? Kind of ironic that an auction site dealing in high tech liquidation sports a Y2K bug 4 years after the fact :-)

  85. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Besides... When you have a steady job and a computer, there is always emulation. ;)

  86. Why choose? by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Yeah but there are better ways to get it then Hummers. I'd rather have flex-time then a chance to take the company Hummer out for a spin once a month or so. I'm sure 95% of the /. readership would agree."

    Sure, but why choose? They could provide *both* flex time *and* loads of goodies. Plus, stock options and high salaries. The biggest thing about the dotcoms was that they really didn't have much in the way of expenses other than bandwidth and labor. It's also worth noting that by buying these things as corporate expenses, they save the programmers buying them themselves. The company can expense these; people can't. Plus, once they IPOed, how do they *keep* the people who just became millionaires: by treating them like millionaires.

    Stock options are a nice perk in stable situations, but they are really volatile in start-ups. The problem is that if the company takes off, now all your employees have enough money that they don't need you anymore. The rational thing might be to hire new employees with regular salaries; the problem was that those people would rather work for another start up and get rich.

    The worst part is that people who recognized that stock prices were unrealistic were pushed aside in favor of those who were willing to ride the bubble. I remember a mutual fund manager getting fired (or at least reassigned within the company) for pulling one of Fidelity's big funds (the one that used to be run by that Lynch guy who retired in his forties) out of stocks because they were overvalued. Unfortunately, he did this a year or two before the bubble burst and thus missed part of the run up. In the end he was proven correct; stocks were over-valued at the time. The problem was that they were due to get *more* over-valued and he missed it.

    The larger problem is that the incentives are screwy. Whether it's accounting (Enron/Worldcom) or investing, there is no benefit to finding problems (like unsupportable predictions of the future). It's a lot easier to just take your paycheck and go home. If something goes wrong, you can always find another job (it's not your money at risk)...eventually. However, if you don't leap on the current opportunity, you miss your chance at a big bonus.

    It's an unstable system. I get to choose whether you gamble or not. If you win, I get part of your losings. If you lose, then you lose and I come out even. Obviously, it makes sense for me to always gamble your money. Worst case? *I'm right where I would have been if I didn't.* What makes this worse is that the way the system worked, I would get paid each time you won but would not pay you back when you lost.

    I talked to one accountant who used to work at one of those big firms (not Arthur Andersen, but similar in size). He said that they were all like that. Finding problems meant having to do more work and not meeting your estimate. Since the accounting firm guaranteed their price (i.e. if they find things wrong, they can't charge you more to actually fix them), there was a real incentive to avoid finding problems. No malevolence/collusion involved. Just the natural evolution of a flawed system.

  87. Oh, thank god! by msimm · · Score: 1

    Now I can hear my favorite artist when I'm in..the elevator? ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  88. MP3.com never owned Hummers and Harleys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    MP3.com never bought any Hummers or Harleys while I was the CEO which was from inception to selling to Vivendi. I believe what you're seeing is assets from ALL the Vivendi digital music companies lumped together - not just MP3.com.

    As for the fitness equipment, MP3.com did buy that. It actually makes sense because it's a one time expense to buy fitness equipment instead of providing employee fitness memberships since that was industry practice back in 1999. Also, due to ridiculous parking restrictions, we couldn't even fill the buildings with people because we couldn't get city to give us places to park cars. (It's their way of "managing" traffic and growth.) So we ended up with a ton of extra space that people can't sit in. Putting in fitness equipment made economic sense and made for healthier employees too. Plus we had a punching bag to take out your frustrations with the state of the digital music business...

    Michael Robertson
    Former CEO, MP3.com

    1. Re:MP3.com never owned Hummers and Harleys by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      At least you don't THINK you ever owned a Hummer or a Harley. Maybe you got Enronated and didn't know.

  89. Cowan & Alexander auctions by arf_barf · · Score: 1

    I went to three auction 2 years ago here in LA and let me tell you that it's very difficult to get a good deal on anything but very expensive equipment (think data vaults, sun servers or mainframes) and of course furniture :-).

  90. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Just give me a boring old cube, a desk, a decent computer, and a steady paycheck with a company where I don't lie awake at night wondering if the doors will be open when I get there tomorrow. Oh, and some old curmudgeon of a boss who's been in business for 20 years and actually knows how to run a company.

    I might recommend that you try working for the government. The non-shooting parts are pretty much like all you describe, besides the "competent manager" bit, but you can't have everything.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  91. TOYota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PUHleaze! Toyotas cannot be destroyed! They just keep going and going...

  92. Depends???? by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

    If the company hummer is loaded with twin .50 cals, and a few hundered rounds of ammo, that might be cool......

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  93. no paypal by skooba · · Score: 1

    the auctioneers don't accept paypal. as if i'm going to send a money order 3,000 miles to some company i've never heard of. sure.

  94. Review time by cve · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry Bill, we're going to have to let you go. Your Galaga scores just aren't high enough.

  95. Win 95 on 3.5" floppies! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    I just sold windows 95 on 3.5" floppies that was still sealed in the box for 27.50 on ebay...

    I put it up as a joke - saying it was a piece of computing history... people started bidding on it!

    Woot.

    1. Re:Win 95 on 3.5" floppies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best investment I ever made, a shrink-wrapper. Now I can shrink-wrap all kinds of items (like windows 95 cartons) and sell them on e-bay!!

      Best part is I got the machine and a 400' roll of wrap for $225 on e-bay.

    2. Re:Win 95 on 3.5" floppies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still chuckling

  96. Exactly by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    I'm sitting in one I got for freeeeee right now. I'd pay for one, too. Worth every penny.

    --
    man rtfm
  97. WebCast Auctions by CitznFish · · Score: 1

    Why don't they list the aprox. times when items will be auctioned off? Basically I have to watch it all day now so i can bid on a few items? (Nope, not telling which ones I want)

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  98. Cow Anal Expanders by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Years ago, I worked for a computer rental company. We had set up a number of computers in a booth at a cattle related trade show. For a couple hours, my boss and I looked at the "products" being advertised in the booth next to us. Most were unitentifiable. One however looked like a giant dildo with a power cord on one end and long copper electrodes running the length of it. It was about 2 feet long. We approached the salesman at the end of the show and asked what it was. He said it was for collecting semen from bulls. "You place this in the bull's rectum and plug it in. It 'stimulates' him." It took us an hour to stop laughing.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  99. dot-com theft fun!!!! by raygundan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew it was coming, and just kept putting the theft off. I wish now I hadn't procrastinated so much on stealing the chair-- but when the day came and they kicked us all out and changed the codes, it was too late. I know a couple of them disappeared, and I even had a no-security-cameras route picked out that made use of the fact that our roof door was unlocked and that it lined up with the fourth floor of the adjacent parking garage. There was a 6' chainlink fence in the way, but i'm sure I could have climbed it and pulled the chair over with me. If only I had gotten around to it. *sigh*

    So (much like the later simpsons episode) I made off with as much ethernet wire as I could.

    One well-prepared bastard had the foresight to lock the super-expensive pro video camera in a filing cabinet and mark it with a distinctive scratch. He bought a lot of 25 beat-up file cabinets later at the auction for about $100, pried the drawer open, and took the camera home after selling the other cabinets for a few bucks to one of the furniture dealers.

    1. Re:dot-com theft fun!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was marked as "funny", but for some strange reason I get this feeling it's a true story.

      I worked at a dot-bomb myself until it closed shop just about this time last year. We all knew it was gonna happen. About 2 or 3 months before it closed, things were being stolen left and right. It started out with items that may have been misplaced, something not so expensive, like a box of pencils, a stack of note pads, a couple of programming/engineering books, and so on. In the end, it was all out crazy. Each man for himself, loot bonanza!

      Laptops, Desktops (!), Aeron Chairs, stereos, professional video cameras, un-used servers, and in the end, servers that WERE in use were stolen. We had about 100 Aeron chairs. Roughly 40 were stolen, and not by the same person, or at the same time, either.

      I'm posting as an anonymous coward so I will admit that in the end, I lost the ethics battle and did some looting of my own, although I regret I never took an Aeron home. When so many people steal so many things, EXPENSIVE things, then people start locking personal/expensive equipment away. It was a weird situation. Anything INSIDE (locked or not) a desk had an unspoken code that you don't touch it. Anything else was game. So when some dork stole a laptop that was stored IN a desk, everyone made a really big fuss, and the laptop re-appeared the next week.

      I didn't do half as much looting as I suspect (and partially know) everyone else did, but in the end the odd pieces that were left over were sold off for pennies to the employees. (I think that was management's way of trying to slow down the theft rate until business finally was over.) I think I spent about $500 for two dual-P3 1U RAID rackmount servers, a Cisco PIX 525, three Cisco 3600 series switches with the GBIC adapters (I still have no idea why I took them... WAY too many ports for use at home!), a half height rack, a Sony camcorder, an HP LaserJet with 2 packs of spare toner, an Epson scanner, 2 ThinkPad T21/22s, and a desk lamp.

      One of our satellite offices was less fortunate. Apparently someone walked in early in the morning, used a cable cutter and just chopped off the power/LAN cables and stuffed about 40 ThinkPads into a bag and walked off.

    2. Re:dot-com theft fun!!!! by raygundan · · Score: 1

      It's a true story. I never got around to stealing anything-- half because I'm a lazy bastard and procrastinated, and half because my conscience just wouldn't let me get in on the looting. Not that the people running the company didn't deserve it for the incredibly lousy decisions that turned our previously profitable and stable small software company into a huge, lumbering dot-com mess.

      I made off with a nice shirt from a racing team from a project I worked on 5 or 6 cat5 patch cables. Nothing huge. We did lose a few aerons, and I know some older laptops disappeared, as did the occasional palm pilot, but the looting wasn't much to speak of. The only really good hauls were the people who "planned ahead" for the auction, like the video camera guy, or another guy who stuffed a ridiculous amount of RAM inside the case of an old pentium aptiva, which he bought at auction for $50.

  100. I love Aeron chairs by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

    The items up for sale include lots of those dumb Herman Miller Aeron chairs that were so popular

    My butt thanks me everyday for having one.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  101. I long for an Aeron chair again by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    They are supurb, simply the most comfortable chair I've ever worked in... I too worked for a dotcom, and we had Aerons everywhere... they were supurb, so confortable, good on my posture, cool... endlessly adjustable... great things.. great... *sigh*

    I didn't have enough money when my company went under to buy mine... and now there aren't really many of those Auctions in Australia any more, so I'm kinda just left wanting.

  102. So what will this crap go for? by DocJD · · Score: 1

    I have never been to a "internet bubble auction". What will some of this stuff sell for? How much will a chair cost? Some of these servers? Does anyone have an idea?

    Chris

    --
    Java Web Application Development http://www.thinkobject.co
  103. Next Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lindows.com

  104. OK, enough about the Aeron chairs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know, we know. They're comfortable and expensive and worth every penny. Just mod any future aeron posts as redundant please!

  105. Looks just fine to me by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

    Well either they fixed it or I'm just too lame to see it. Actually, that statement probably doesn't need to be an exclusive or...

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  106. $699 buys a lot of hookers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  107. Property of U.S. Postal Service by lightray · · Score: 1

    I like how the "Property of US Postal Service" label on a mail crate is blurred out in this photo:

    http://www.cowanalexander.com/Events/CA031004/PV 2% 5CIMG/IMG_0019.JPG

  108. I understand, but... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    1) could they have spent their money on something else that would have improved your lives more for the same money?

    2) did having the chairs either decrease turnover (and make the people working there happier for less pay than it might have taken otherwise)? did the chairs improve worker output or quality more than spending the same money on something else would have?

    Others have referred to other potential solution to reclining problems that might solve the same problems at lower price/higher effectiveness. Part of why people don't buy these chairs for themselves often is because the price doesn't justify the expense. If there are better or cheaper ways to make people happier and I'm spending someone else's money (which I shouldn't be spending unless I think I can get something for both the investors and my business for it) then spending money on the chairs doesn't make sense.

    The chairs may have been nice, and I'm glad that the company was fair in giving them to everyone. The job of companies is to spend the money efficiently - part of that is keeping their workers happy and productive. There might have been better ways to spend the money to make you happy than on a chair; when companies spend their money inefficiently or badly (as if it weren't theirs), in the long run everyone loses.

    You can take this in context with my liberal opinions (the gov't is perhaps one of the worst organizations for spending other people's money).

    1. Re:I understand, but... by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Sure a chair at $750 may seem expensive, but unlike computers, software, and employees, chairs tend to stick around a lot longer if taken care of. The chairs we had before the Aerons looked like they came out of the 70's show. Considering that the fabric chairs lasted about 20 years... if the Aerons were to last that long.... So if the Aerons were to last 20 something years, that's only a mere $35 a year. Not a bad investment. A $2000 computer usually gets junked after 2 years or so. Software at expensive corporate prices are being upgraded and bought everyday.... Each employee has 2 computers and lots of software. Probably costs $10,000 upwards to seat an employee at a desk, with 2 computers loaded with software and a desk. And about $5000 per year would be spent in hardware/software upgrades. So I'd think buying a chair at $750 over 20 years is a pretty good investment for the company whether or not it makes the employee happy or not.

      Not to mention, we just replaced all our cubicle walls with newer walls (not that I could tell). I'm sure the cubical walls cost a lot more than that Aeron chair!

  109. I didn't mean to slam Tyco.... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    just that the executives who ran it are accused of treating your company like it was their personal piggy bank, to the company's (and its investors' and employees') detriment.

    I think "someone else's money" sums it up pretty well.

    1. Re:I didn't mean to slam Tyco.... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      No offense taken. I'm pretty pissed that the guy ran the company right off the rails... seems like they're doing ok now, but it's tough to recover from a scandal like that.

  110. A mathematical case for the Aeron chair by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

    I don't see the case for the Aeron being overpriced.

    Assuming a one weeks for 50 weeks a year for 8 hours a day, that's 2000 hours a week.

    Assuming the chair lasts for five years (mine has been going strong for four, with a replacement of the lumbar support covered under warranty), that's 10,000 hours of use.

    So, if you paid an overpriced $1200, that works out to $0.12/hour of use. Very price effective luxury. WAY better than spending more for a better car, for example. Not quite as good as the lovely luxury price-performance of 3-ply toilet paper.

    Another way of looking at it is in costs saved. For example, it doesn't take too many fewer chiropractor visits to pay for the chair.

  111. open your eyes? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    The auctioning of all the MP3 assets so of gave it away...

    It might be the fact that they had to pay $250M in a copyright lawsuit. And, there probably were more lawsuits on their way.


    There are many reasons why a company goes backrup that are not related to employee productivity. Ask the people at Enron.


    Even if it was employee productivity, the management should have done something about the productivity.


    Think about this. If an employee wants to take an hour of their time to exercise, thay can leave the building, drive 30 minutes each way and then go home after they work out OR work out for an hour, then go back to work.

  112. Biggest Waste of Money by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    Biggest Waste of Money: Gym equipment for computer nerds.

    Oh c'mon! No wonder why they went out of business. Idiots.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  113. Look at the pictures again by teknikl · · Score: 2, Funny
    They were trying to start an online record label. Looks to me that it was a hell of a party.

    A lot of toys, big comfy sofas, and audio gear.

    It looks like a great nightclub - when does it open?

  114. Disassembly of an Aerons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So they have a bunch of Aerons in another office of my company. The problem is, I don't work in that office ... and I'm guessing they might notice if I were to wheel the thing out the front door. I could, however, ship one out of the building (ala Entrapment). Do these things disassemble with any ease ... or does 1 million adjustment points = 1 million places that need to be disassembled?

  115. just think about what you spend... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I don't disagree with what you wrote. Buying expensive furniture, etc. isn't always bad - but when you buy it there should be a good reason that you do it. You shouldn't buy the furniture because it's cool, but because it is likely to make your employees happier and/or increase productivity or decrease turnover. If there is a cheaper solution to do the same thing that doesn't have serious disadvantages (added maintenance, for example), then one should do that in preference. If there is something else that might improve employee health/happiness/productivity more, then one should do that instead.

    My point was simply that sometimes executives and employees treat the company's money (or the investors' money) as if were of no value and spend it accordingly, particularly on things for which they would not spend their own money. It seems like you should treat your investors' money as if it were more valuable than your own - you should act as best you can to use it properly.

  116. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HERE HERE my boss is an asshole a complete fucking ass and one hell of a dick, with balls the size of grape fruite, a flake, a real jerk, and an ego to mach curses like a sailor gives me some bull shit work and ocasionally pulls my leg.

    In other words he's great in many ways he's NOT pretentious knows his shit, wants to do the same.

    He DOES however let me know when I did wrong has good solid HONEST opinions for me on and solid advice, and does so without being rude and nasty.

  117. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by llefler · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't believe how long I've been looking for a cocktail Dig Dug. I missed one 2 years ago at an auction when I thought $350 was too expensive. I've regretted that decision ever since.

    Pretty much, if you recognize the name of the game and it's in decent shape, those 20 year old games are expensive. I've got a 1980 Black Knight pinball that's worth well over $1000. (and wouldn't you know it, too much RSI to play it)

    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  118. That's not how I got one of Those Dumb Chairs by rodgster · · Score: 1

    I just waited for my girlfriend to buy one (at a cowan alexander auction).

    When she became an ex-girlfriend, she just left the chair with me. I never even asked her for. Rather I asked her to take it several times.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
  119. Dig Dug by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Ah, just build your own cabinet with plans off the Internet, and put in a PC equipped with MAME. It'll be in a _lot_ better shape than any original machine. If all you want is Dig Dug, buy some broken-down board with the ROMs on it, and only load that ROM onto the MAME machine, all nice and legal.

  120. "Yellow Hummer?" by Guppy06 · · Score: 0

    Is that a vehicle or a racially-slurred reference to oral sex?

  121. Aeron or 5 weeks disability...tough choice by HDlife · · Score: 1
    After suffering a ruptured disc and pinched nerve in my back, which led to weeks of severe, unstoppable pain, surgery and months of not being able to sit for more than five minutes...I got a decent chair. Do you know who gets a herniated disc? People in their mid-30's who sit for long periods of time. (aka Coders)

    Any good office chair costs hundreds of dollars. A Steelcase-brand ergo chair will set you back a cool grand. The Aeron has been a back saver for me for 5 years...and I'm never going back. There's nothing else quite like it.

    ObOn-topic-comment:

    MP3.com was an amazing place. It was not nearly as over-the-top as it looks. It was pretty par for the course for an entertainment-related .com company. They had a tremendous staff of engineers and music folks. It was a conflict between their CEO's ego and the law that killed them.

  122. Re: they'll all be wiped. Guess again by rodgster · · Score: 1

    Right.

    I have bought equipment from Cowan Alexander's auctions that still had intact data present. No once over write. No Format the Partitions. No Del the Partition Table.

    I can remember finding an offline copy of one company's Exchange Server's priv & pub (the entire email database if you're familiar with M$ Exchange server). Just for shits and giggles, I preped a recovery server, mounted the priv and pub. Everything in everyone's email (it was a telecom company or ISP if I remember right) available to my prying eyes.

    After a few mailboxes, I lost interest and blew the whole thing away.

    Oh and while on the subject. Notice how Cowan's registration page asks for credit card info, yet the page is NOT ENCRYPTED?

    I was assured that a script just verifies that the number is legit (validation algorithm). I was further told if I don't like it, don't use it. I told them I should take TCP Drump and verfiy it for myself.

    I sent an email to sans.org re: the possible submission of unencrypted CC data being sent via cowan, but never heard back from them.

    I'm sure someone here may verify what indeed happens to this data.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
  123. FPGA by snatchitup · · Score: 1

    What the heck were they doing with a $1M FPGA simulator? Doesn't seem part of their business model.

  124. MP3 com platinum artist that got scammed by vcjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I tried to sign up my band "Dancing Baptists" for $99 last fall. After they charged my credit card money, I got spit to a page telling me MP3.com is shutting down in a week, thanked me for my business, and that I could not upload any new songs. I never got a refund. After several e-mails, I gave up. It seems that many others had the same thing happen to them... too bad it did not happen to a lawyer so there could be a class action against C-net. Oh well, not worth my time, I'm having fun at my new home www.dancingbaptist.com

  125. Ok, why doesn't someone open another mp3.com? by Keybounce · · Score: 0

    OK, why not open another mp3.com?

    Sure, you can't keep the URL (unless that's up for auction), but the basic product -- an alternative music distribution channel for people that want more money for their songs than they could get from the big 5 record companies -- is still viable.

    Mp3.com didn't die because of a bad business model. It died because of a bad court decision from a bad law, and bad advice from lawyers. Don't forget, after VU took over mp3.com, the new mp3.com sued that law firm for bad advice (now that they had the money to sue the lawyers :-).

    From my personal experience, the UI of mp3.com went downhill after VU took it over. It went from an easy to use site to an impossible to use site, so I stopped using it. So did a lot of people. Then, it was dropped and put out of business.

    So lets reopen it. The guys that built the original mp3.com know how to do it, they could be the advisors even if they can't (because of lawsuit) run it themselves.

    This time around, people know what they are doing. After buying the servers, you've got much of the system code. You should be able to restart it for a 1/10 of the cost this time around, especially with the lower programmer costs :-).

    Hey, I'm unemployed, and willing to work with this company!

    Michael

  126. Add just one letter... by Riktov · · Score: 1

    cowanalexpander

  127. Terms and Conditions does not permit it by BovineOne · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you read the Terms and Conditions on the Cowan Alexander website, you'll see a section where it says:

    • The sale of computer hardware does not include any software programs or any data that may exist in such computer hardware. Purchaser agrees and warrants that any software accompanying the property that is the subject of this bill of sale will be removed by the purchaser and destroyed, including, without limitation, the removal and destruction of any software or intellectual property. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold seller harmless from any claims arising from failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph.
    --
    Don't waste those cycles! Put them to use! http://www.distributed.net/
  128. heh, I took the cameras... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    eom

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  129. WARNING: THE SITE REGISTRATION IS UNENCRYPTED by Giordano · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is NOT an SSL site, do NOT send your credit card info from the form.

  130. Auctioning MP3s by KidSock · · Score: 1

    Great! I should be able to pick up a lot of unpurchased mp3s at a great price. They're probably going for like $2.

  131. Stinking chairs by atani · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I thought the Aeron chairs were ridiculous too, until I sat in one for a while. Maybe it's because I never had a chair worth the farts embedded in its fabric before, but the Aeron is a damn fine chair that's done wonders for my back; and, apropos the previously mentioned farts, the Aeron doesn't suffer from the I-inherited-some-smelly-geek's-chair-and-can-no-lo nger-breath-through-my-nose phenomenon.

    All that's not to say the your company (or you) should go out and drop $800 on a chair if they (you) can barely pay the electric bill. But should you/your company find itself with a little extra cash to spend on posture and long-term comfort... they rock!

  132. John Kerry by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    Is the John Kerry auction on ebay still going on?

  133. Man did they go through some big money by HPNpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at all that stuff. Games. Gym. More games. Video studio. Audio Studio. Top end furniture. And massive amounts of computer stuff.

    Something seems wrong here. I run a small business and we don't throw money around like there is an infinite amount - we are responsible. Why, when it's "other people's money" is it ok to go hog wild? When I was in a dot-com in the boom years they were spending like a drunken sailor also, and when I asked why the response was that the VC people wanted it to look like a winning company, with lavish offices and everything so that they had a good cash out strategy. All the top people knew it was insane but they had to play the game.

  134. More stuff coming soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe soon we will see an action from Lindows... er... I mean "Lind--s"

  135. You believe that bs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE reason dot-coms failed wasn't because of failed business plans, or opulent spending - its Ken Lay and Enron.

    Its that simple.

    When you buy into the myth that dot coms failed because of something they did wrong, you buy into the lies that are permeating our society.

    Here's the quick breakdown:

    The most important underlying cost for all businesses is ENERGY.

    Enron manipulated the energy market, which lead to radical increases in the cost of gas, jet fuel, electricity.

    This lead to increases in shipping expenses - which undermined the profit margain for companies that had to ship goods, like dot coms.

    The energy market in California was re-regulated in such a way to bring billions to Enron, also via manipulation. This lead to the rolling blackouts in 2000 that caused unexpected expenses - backup servers, generators, etc, plus all the additional expenses incurred during a blackout - such as water damage from frozen air conditioners, server failures, etc.

    Simply put, the reason the dot com bubble burst was because Ken Lay, and his friends dubya and dick, pricked it. They siphoned off the capital, and they used their control of the media to perpetuate the myth of the dot coms.

    Much in the same way that the media industry turned "fair use" into "piracy", these scumbags turned "outside manipulation and fraud" into "gen-x'ers spending money foolishly".

    In case you forgot, the reason dot coms had all those creature comforts was to keep people at work for 12 hours a day! They provided drinks and food so people would work at their desk! They increased productivity through smart, progressive reforms - not by threatening entire departments with outsourcing to India!

    Just don't forgot who the president was when the bubble burst!

  136. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


    But at least working for the government, they don't expect much out of you.

    ob. "You don't know what it's like out there. I've worked in the private sector--they expect results."

    --
    "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
    Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  137. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    At least that's what they are calling it.

    At least *what* are they calling *what*? Somebody doesn't know how to communicate......

  138. Open Source Music License by ebooher · · Score: 1

    In a linux magazine I read regularly (and I can't remember right now if it is Linux Format which is a UK publication or Linux Journal) they ran an article just a couple months ago about some company in Germany I think that is running what they call something like the "Open Source Music License."

    The only reason I bring this up is because in my opinion the concept they are using is pretty cool. *YOU* decide how much you are going to pay for an artists album and then are given access to download it from their web site.

    When you are on the payment screen it has these reminds of what percentage of your payment goes directly to the artist (and I seem to remember it's fairly high, something like 30-50% then again, I've slept since then.) So if you think it's only worth a buck, it tells you the artist is getting 50 cents, but if you pay 10 bucks it tells you the artist is getting 5 bucks

    I'm trying to give you guys as much information as my swiss cheese brain can remember because I can't remember the URL, but if I remember it later on I'll hunt up the issue I'm talking about and let you know more about it.

    May turn out to be an interesting replacement for MP3.com. Just a thought.

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  139. Re:Video games... Couldn't do better than Galaga? by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    I might recommend that you try working for the government. The non-shooting parts are pretty much like all you describe, besides the "competent manager" bit, but you can't have everything.

    I actually gave that some thought. I'm a previous government employee (I formerly did one of the "shooting parts" :^), and at one time applied for a job at the DFAO and later a job with a local law enforcement agency (both "non-shooting" IT jobs). The only problem with government work is that, compared with the private sector, the pay scales seem a bit low. Then again, the benefits are usually better.

    Anyway, my current job is pretty much everything I described: boring cube, cluttered desk, a computer less than a year old, and a steady paycheck. And my CEO is about as non-dot-com as they come. However, if in the future I'm once again pounding the pavement, I'll probably take another look at government service.

  140. Stealing your credit card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone noticed they want you to register with a credit card on their non-SSL site? Hmmmm

  141. So many shattered dreams by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Maybe all the ex-employees of MP3.com landed on their feet, but looking through the pictures I imagine people who were living the high life and then got the rug pulled out from under them.

    --
    -Rich