According to their website, their goal is to "bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy." Can anyone explain to me which Biblical principle is at stake here?
Taking a brutal dictator seriously is exactly the wrong approach. I'd rather remember him as a supporting character in a lowbrow puppet comedy. I won't bother to post the YouTube link, since there's already two or three up here.
Gasoline is already a hardcore solvent, so you'd need something even more powerful than that. Whatever that might be, I wouldn't want to keep it in the house.
Bullshit. They knew that China's environmental regulations are a joke, and they still chose to have their hardware manufactured there. The pollution must be REALLY bad if the Chinese govt is actually doing something about it.
Are you fucking serious? Clicking the link and reading just a few lines at the top would have answered your question (and would have been much less work than typing this post).
They're a real estate broker. They make money when the property is sold; displaying ads is only a means to selling the property. Why do they object when people are copying and re-publishing their ads?
and the musicians should get a "real job" if they want to earn money
For most musicians, that's the way things are right now. Just like it was back in the ancient days before the internet. Have you ever tried playing music? You'll be lucky if you can recoup the cost of your instrument. (If your instrument is the penny whistle or the spoons, then you might have a shot.)
Let's skip the ass dance and hear what these fundamental problems are, and how to solve them.
Here's a few:
1. No standard way to import an external script file. 2. No multithreading. 3. Often hard to figure out what the keyword 'this' is referring to. 4. 'null' and 'undefined' are two different values (even though null == undefined evaluates to true!). 5. No namespaces.
How to solve those problems? Use one of the many existing OOP languages that don't suffer from any of them. You'd have to create an API for accessing the DOM from that language, and set up a sandbox within the browser, but at least you'd save yourself the work of creating a whole new language.
According to their website, their goal is to "bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy." Can anyone explain to me which Biblical principle is at stake here?
Chrome is not open-source. Chromium is; but nobody uses Chromium, because it's basically just a crippled version of Chrome.
Google is pretty open-minded about that "evil" thing. But more importantly, they have a strong financial interest in not breaking the internet.
"Today's youth"? Really? You telling us that yesterday's youth was any better?
So you have ten months to prepare.
I bet if we all work hard, we can produce even more bugs next October.
Taking a brutal dictator seriously is exactly the wrong approach. I'd rather remember him as a supporting character in a lowbrow puppet comedy. I won't bother to post the YouTube link, since there's already two or three up here.
You would? Really? Force Sensitive sounds like a marketing slogan for a condom. That was badly translated from Chinese.
Gasoline is already a hardcore solvent, so you'd need something even more powerful than that. Whatever that might be, I wouldn't want to keep it in the house.
What's a record, grandpa?
Under Capitalism, man oppresses man. Under Communism, it's exactly the opposite.
- Woody Allen
Freenet solves the spam problem by ensuring that nobody actually uses Freenet. I think this project will apply the same solution.
This scheme has pretty slim chances of success. Which doesn't necessarily mean it shouldn't be attempted.
Can't wait until it's finished
I skimmed the article, and there's nothing there to suggest that anybody is actually trying to build this thing. This pyramid is vaporware.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/12280.shtml
The 95 Ram 2500 is supposed to get 12 MPG with the stock engine. So I'd say that's not bad at all.
USSR? Elected? Please tell me this is a joke.
Bullshit. They knew that China's environmental regulations are a joke, and they still chose to have their hardware manufactured there. The pollution must be REALLY bad if the Chinese govt is actually doing something about it.
I expect a drug addict to steal, not a wall street banker.
Well, there's your problem right there.
Where can you buy this kinky American freedom armor?
There's an on-line store that sells those. Unfortunately, my ISP is blocking it.
Are you fucking serious? Clicking the link and reading just a few lines at the top would have answered your question (and would have been much less work than typing this post).
As a company who has ads out, do you want people to look at your ads only or the ads for you and your competitors?
And now, people visiting this site will only see ads from C-21's competitors. Well done, guys.
Also, with real estate the commissions on a property sold are split between the real estate agent of the buyer and the seller.
Completely irrelevant. Just because someone publishes an ad doesn't make them an agent.
They're a real estate broker. They make money when the property is sold; displaying ads is only a means to selling the property. Why do they object when people are copying and re-publishing their ads?
Exactly - it's not even close.
A blood alcohol level of just 0.4% is lethal. But for a water-alcohol mixture to burn at room temperature, you need something like 70-80% alcohol.
and the musicians should get a "real job" if they want to earn money
For most musicians, that's the way things are right now. Just like it was back in the ancient days before the internet. Have you ever tried playing music? You'll be lucky if you can recoup the cost of your instrument. (If your instrument is the penny whistle or the spoons, then you might have a shot.)
Let's skip the ass dance and hear what these fundamental problems are, and how to solve them.
Here's a few:
1. No standard way to import an external script file.
2. No multithreading.
3. Often hard to figure out what the keyword 'this' is referring to.
4. 'null' and 'undefined' are two different values (even though null == undefined evaluates to true!).
5. No namespaces.
How to solve those problems? Use one of the many existing OOP languages that don't suffer from any of them. You'd have to create an API for accessing the DOM from that language, and set up a sandbox within the browser, but at least you'd save yourself the work of creating a whole new language.
Run diesel engines on methane? Not bloody likely.
I apologize for insulting the redneck race.
The preferred term is "person with a neck of color".