Glenn Beck hasnt denied the rape accusations, and until he does I have no doubt that Glenn Beck is a child raping murderer. Why wont he address these claims? I cant believe that these claims have been around for so long and he has not commented on them. I'm shocked. I guess he really does not care about the children or god. How can any man with a Fox News show get away without dealing with these claims. I never knew these claims existed on the internet until just now and after reading these claims, I'm amazed and shocked at Glenn Beck's unwillingness to refute these claims. Perhaps because deep down, he knows he's guilty of rape and murder?
Glenn Beck needs to be stopped before he rapes and kills again.
When your opponent literally is a moron, it is an accurate point that illustrates the clarity and honesty brought to the political discourse for which she should not be taking part in because she is a fucking moron.
If you want to allow these types of carnies to game our political system for their financial gain at the cost of peoples lives and jobs... you're a fucking moron too.
Everything you've said I agree with except Firefox does seem to scroll and render smoother.
If I were picking a UI, I'd take chrome, although it needs to improve in many areas. Chrome is cleaner looking, more streamlined, less nonsense... If google got the cpu usage down and improved scrolling I would probably jump back again.
I have as much bad to say about chrome as I do firefox... except that I find firefox to perform a bit better when rendering and scrolling.
For a while now, Firefox has color management on by default. It was true that it was once off by default and you had to turn it on, but now it appears to be on.
Color management is important to me. I'm a photographer and a 3d animator, so if a browser isnt color managed, its a serious problem. Granted not everyone has their monitors properly profiled but for those that do and even those that dont... it helps display images closer to srgb standards. Anyone that has a wide gamut monitor will desperately want color management in their browser, other wise images look terribly over saturated and too dark.
If they're hiring 3d Animators and pay amazingly well... I'll consider their offer. Until then, I do not work at all on any web browser for any of the major companies.
Take your asshole attitude and fuck your mothers dusty cunt you inhumane anti social piece of basement dwelling shit. Whats a matter, pussy rejecting you?
So you dont scroll when you go to a website? Funny.. thats usually the first thing I do... I read and scroll.
Believe it.:) There's no reason for me to make it up.
You're right Chrome is very fast to load as a program. Same here, Quad core 8 gigs, except, 6TB Sata raids, no SSD, GTX 470, 30inch monitor... at 2560x1600. Thats a lot of pixels to scroll nice and smooth. Firefox 4 scrolls better with less cpu usage, and thats even with smooth scroll turned off in Firefox.
No idea why that is, but thats how it is. I've always found webkit to scroll a little chunkier than firefox, be it chrome or safari.
Chrome's page loading speed seems about the same, not sure about cpu usage on that as I havent checked. Chrome certainly launches faster. I'm not a huge fan of Firefox's download manager. It really needs to be revamped.
Chrome's UI looks a lot nicer that is for sure, although as I said before, I prefer FireFox's bookmark manager as it seems more powerful for organizing and editing of bookmarks.
Even pages with flash on them scroll better in Firefox 4 than chrome on my pc. No idea why that is.. but... its how it is:)
Chrome is a very nice browser with plenty to offer design wise. I'm a fan, but I do find Firefox to be faster on new and old hardware. It scrolls and renders pages a lot smoother than Chrome has ever done.
Chrome loads pages fast, but in terms of cpu performance, Firefox seems to perform better.
It's interesting, I'm comparing them right now, so that I'm pretty accurate in my statements, and I find chrome likes to chug a bit when scrolling back and forth fast... Firefox is smooth as smooth gets. For example Chrome's scroll bar gets choppy and cant keep up with my mouse movements if I scroll very fast from top to bottom (repeat). In firefox, theres no lag at all.
To be fair though, Chrome's ad-block extensions do actually block ads from downloading now. For a while they just hid the ads from the viewer. However I still tend to find ad-block faster in firefox. I find that ad-block shows down chrome.
There is just something about webkit that doesnt scroll very well either. I cant tell what that is, but safari is guilty of the same problem. Firefox has a very nice scroll/render, where as chrome seems more choppy... although not horrible, just not as nice as firefox.
I've compared the two on new and older hardware, firefox scrolls smoother, loads faster. Compare heavy sites like Huffingtonpost.com. Try it with both adblock plus on and off in each browser.
Scroll... It becomes quite obvious that firefox scrolls better, and loads faster, but if you really want proof try it on older hardware. It becomes very obvious.
I was using Chrome for a while and was fairly happy with it, but Firefox 4 is faster. I run it on newer and older Pcs and Firefox 4 performs a lot better on both newer and older hardware.
Slashdot Mirror
Glenn Beck hasnt denied the rape accusations, and until he does I have no doubt that Glenn Beck is a child raping murderer. Why wont he address these claims? I cant believe that these claims have been around for so long and he has not commented on them. I'm shocked. I guess he really does not care about the children or god. How can any man with a Fox News show get away without dealing with these claims. I never knew these claims existed on the internet until just now and after reading these claims, I'm amazed and shocked at Glenn Beck's unwillingness to refute these claims. Perhaps because deep down, he knows he's guilty of rape and murder?
Glenn Beck needs to be stopped before he rapes and kills again.
MSNBC lost a reporter in the war...
Fox's war reporter (Geraldo) gave away US positions and plans on the air.
Fucking piece of shit computer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARGH
Good luck finding a friend or a neighbor that knows how to fix linux problems.
When your opponent literally is a moron, it is an accurate point that illustrates the clarity and honesty brought to the political discourse for which she should not be taking part in because she is a fucking moron.
If you want to allow these types of carnies to game our political system for their financial gain at the cost of peoples lives and jobs... you're a fucking moron too.
I would say no to H.264, if it had not revolutionized video delivery and became the standard format to deliver high quality HD video to end users.
H.264 is the standard. Browsers should play it.
Everything you've said I agree with except Firefox does seem to scroll and render smoother.
If I were picking a UI, I'd take chrome, although it needs to improve in many areas. Chrome is cleaner looking, more streamlined, less nonsense... If google got the cpu usage down and improved scrolling I would probably jump back again.
I have as much bad to say about chrome as I do firefox... except that I find firefox to perform a bit better when rendering and scrolling.
For a while now, Firefox has color management on by default. It was true that it was once off by default and you had to turn it on, but now it appears to be on.
Color management is important to me. I'm a photographer and a 3d animator, so if a browser isnt color managed, its a serious problem. Granted not everyone has their monitors properly profiled but for those that do and even those that dont... it helps display images closer to srgb standards. Anyone that has a wide gamut monitor will desperately want color management in their browser, other wise images look terribly over saturated and too dark.
If they're hiring 3d Animators and pay amazingly well... I'll consider their offer. Until then, I do not work at all on any web browser for any of the major companies.
BTW how did you find this comment? DID YOU SCROLL DOWN TO IT? You fucking tool.
Take your asshole attitude and fuck your mothers dusty cunt you inhumane anti social piece of basement dwelling shit. Whats a matter, pussy rejecting you?
So you dont scroll when you go to a website? Funny.. thats usually the first thing I do... I read and scroll.
Unfortuantely I have seen this, and it still seems to be a problem for Firefox but Firefox does in general perform better for me than chrome
Believe it. :) There's no reason for me to make it up.
You're right Chrome is very fast to load as a program. Same here, Quad core 8 gigs, except, 6TB Sata raids, no SSD, GTX 470, 30inch monitor... at 2560x1600. Thats a lot of pixels to scroll nice and smooth. Firefox 4 scrolls better with less cpu usage, and thats even with smooth scroll turned off in Firefox.
No idea why that is, but thats how it is. I've always found webkit to scroll a little chunkier than firefox, be it chrome or safari.
Chrome's page loading speed seems about the same, not sure about cpu usage on that as I havent checked. Chrome certainly launches faster. I'm not a huge fan of Firefox's download manager. It really needs to be revamped.
Chrome's UI looks a lot nicer that is for sure, although as I said before, I prefer FireFox's bookmark manager as it seems more powerful for organizing and editing of bookmarks.
Even pages with flash on them scroll better in Firefox 4 than chrome on my pc. No idea why that is.. but... its how it is :)
Chrome is a very nice browser with plenty to offer design wise. I'm a fan, but I do find Firefox to be faster on new and old hardware. It scrolls and renders pages a lot smoother than Chrome has ever done.
Chrome loads pages fast, but in terms of cpu performance, Firefox seems to perform better.
It's interesting, I'm comparing them right now, so that I'm pretty accurate in my statements, and I find chrome likes to chug a bit when scrolling back and forth fast... Firefox is smooth as smooth gets. For example Chrome's scroll bar gets choppy and cant keep up with my mouse movements if I scroll very fast from top to bottom (repeat). In firefox, theres no lag at all.
Whats your cpu usage while scrolling? compare chrome to firefox 4 beta using this page.
Also, chrome takes more cpu usage while scrolling than firefox. Chrome takes about 35% to 40% on a quadcore to scroll this page.
FireFox, takes 18%-24%
To be fair though, Chrome's ad-block extensions do actually block ads from downloading now. For a while they just hid the ads from the viewer. However I still tend to find ad-block faster in firefox. I find that ad-block shows down chrome.
There is just something about webkit that doesnt scroll very well either. I cant tell what that is, but safari is guilty of the same problem. Firefox has a very nice scroll/render, where as chrome seems more choppy... although not horrible, just not as nice as firefox.
I've compared the two on new and older hardware, firefox scrolls smoother, loads faster. Compare heavy sites like Huffingtonpost.com. Try it with both adblock plus on and off in each browser.
Scroll... It becomes quite obvious that firefox scrolls better, and loads faster, but if you really want proof try it on older hardware. It becomes very obvious.
Chrome's ad-blocker isnt as fast as the firefox version of ad-block. Chrome is still a bit wonky in that area.
I switched back to Firefox from Chrome.
Chrome is nice, a bit under featured, poor ad blocking (although it has gotten better its still slower and not as good as firefox.
In general, Firefox is faster than chrome all around. Even on older hardware, Firefox scrolls better than Chrome.
Firefox's bookmark manager is much nicer. I loved how chrome syncs your bookmarks but now that FireFox has it built in as well, I'm plenty happy.
Firefox has better color management. Chrome nice but... It still has that slight sluggish feeling about how it renders pages.
The new Firefox betas are looking and performing very well, so well that I switched back from chrome.
I just bought a GTX 470 this week. I too wonder.
I'm a progressive liberal minded person but dumb shit like this makes Democrats look like fucking out of touch assholes.
We dont need a label on a videogame. It's not cancer... get the fuck over it. GET TO WORK ON UNIVERSAL MEDICARE FOR ALL ASSHOLE.
BOOOO firefox then. I thought they were supporting both.
I was using Chrome for a while and was fairly happy with it, but Firefox 4 is faster. I run it on newer and older Pcs and Firefox 4 performs a lot better on both newer and older hardware.