Wall Street's belief is that there is an efficient market, when there clearly isn't.
I bought a Sept 17, $27.50 put on RIMM on Thursday at $75. I sold it on Friday for $425. If I was riskier I could have put $7500 out and made $42,500. In 18 hours.
No inside information, I just believed that RIMM was going to go down - like a lot of other people - yet them market was not efficient enough to see this drastic change.
Man, I miss the subluxation ads.
And, since it is South Korea, tasty!
No, but it forces you to be social. Which is a large part of being human.
The point isn't the sports. It's the social interaction you get by being forced to deal with people on a team.
No, it's because they don't know what society is. They never fit in, so they never learned about it.
Make the kid go play a sport. Make him learn to be a teammate, human, part of society.
Sign him up for sports. Make him play for 2 years. Make him learn to be a teammate. Make him learn to be a human.
And 10,000 new CDs to make...
Or Google?
Context. It's what's for breakfast.
If it takes half a second to launch an app, on any platform, who cares if it's running or not?
If there was ever a bigger whoosh....
An earth full of tired tree cutters?
Analysts. Is there nothing they can get right?
http://daringfireball.net/2010/09/kumar_track_record
The blog post has the patch. Lower the privs:
sudo chmod 100 /usr/bin/dscl
- Is there some sort of policy on these blogs that prevents them from mentioning their competition?
Yes.
http://www.marco.org/2011/09/16/some-other-tablets-you-may-have-seen
This is probably a cheaper option then.
http://store.truconnect.com/devices/truconnect-mifi.html
Sure, that will be good enough for light-speed particles.
Hopefully.
Probably.
Well, probably not.
And rename it Bookster?
Wall Street's belief is that there is an efficient market, when there clearly isn't.
I bought a Sept 17, $27.50 put on RIMM on Thursday at $75. I sold it on Friday for $425. If I was riskier I could have put $7500 out and made $42,500. In 18 hours.
No inside information, I just believed that RIMM was going to go down - like a lot of other people - yet them market was not efficient enough to see this drastic change.
Read it using 'house' as a verb.
As in, the US is housing the creator of the TSA and wants to kill it. It referring to the creator, not the TSA.
they are pulling a top-down strong arm corporate bottom-line move.
That's some authentic frontier gibberish right there, folks!
Is that part of the Republican debate?
Heh, I was thinking Google. Or Microsoft. Or Oracle. Or IBM.
I'm not sure you can have a 'very small percentage' when working with only 8 volunteers.
Poor business models == being sold?
Chasing revenues over profits == being sold?