Slashdot Mirror


Study Suggests Magnets Can Force You to Tell the Truth

Estonian researchers claim that magnets can either force you to lie or make it impossible. Subjects in the study had magnets placed at either the left or the right side of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the results suggest that the individual was either unable to tell the truth or unable to lie depending on which side was stimulated. From the article: "Last year, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology also used powerful magnets to disrupt the area said to be the brain's 'moral compass,' situated behind the right ear, making people temporarily less moral."

320 comments

  1. Fucking magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...how do they work?

    1. Re:Fucking magnets... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just like voodoo magic. Gimme a hair off of your head, I'll make a voodoo doll, and stick a gold coin up it's ass. From now on, you'll shit gold. You'll hate going to the bathroom, but you'll soon be one of the richest mofos on this planet!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:Fucking magnets... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      There is the seed of an esoteric, mystical truth in what you have posted.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Fucking magnets... by i_b_don · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Yeah see, the magnets... they pull each other closer... they push each other away... It always goes on. you can't explain that. you can't explain it."

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    4. Re:Fucking magnets... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can't even SPELL esoteric, or mystical. You must be confusing me with Confucius or something!

      Oh, wait - I screwed that up, didn't I?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Fucking magnets... by AvderTheTerrible · · Score: 0

      I dont really care how it works, what I care is if it leaves my ability to refuse to answer intact.

    6. Re:Fucking magnets... by spazdor · · Score: 2

      I think you're a bit Confuced.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    7. Re:Fucking magnets... by i_b_don · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know... the funny thing is that this statement is much more true for magnets than it is for tides. Magnetism, like gravity, is a fundamental force that we can't explain. It just is. It is just one of the rules of the universe and we haven't been able penetrate other than to measure and bound it's behavior with mathematical equations.

      d

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    8. Re:Fucking magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We cannot explain magnetism?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction

    9. Re:Fucking magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You know... the funny thing is that this statement is much more true for magnets than it is for tides. Magnetism, like gravity, is a fundamental force that we can't explain ... so if this is true for magnets (like gravity), _more_ than it is for tides...

      How exactly do you explain tides?

      This is absolutely shocking.

    10. Re:Fucking magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're magic magnets, and the secret of u.f.o. power too? This publication has had several stories about u.f.o.s in recent months.

      http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/208726/20110905/mars-attack-ufo-causes-china-airport-to-divert-flights.htm
      http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/186748/20110726/ufo-seen-in-cape-town-south-africa-how-to-find-it-using-google-earth-unidentified-flying-object-ufo.htm
      http://tv.ibtimes.com/did-treasure-hunters-find-a-ufo-on-the-ocean-floor/1509.html

      Perhaps The International Business Times really has the stuff to give a company an advantage.
      If the folks at HP were reading, maybe they could have taken a bold step, skipping Slate and Tablet and going straight to Tabloid.
      Maybe their magnetic chargers had magnets on the wrong side? It's not easy to master the Reality Distortion Field...

    11. Re:Fucking magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret to good testing is in giving people well crafted test phrases..

      Control group:
      "I always lie"

      Test Group:
      "I never tell the truth"

  2. Don't tell the TSA by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

    Just wait until Pistole hears of this.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:Don't tell the TSA by yog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, man, you just ruined my day! Those suckers would definitely take this idea and run with it.

      TSA rep: "All passengers will place their heads into the magnetic lie detector and answer the simple question: 'Are you a hijacker?' If you answer in the affirmative, you will be detained. Please remove earrings and other metallic objects."

      Armed with this technology, they should be able to nab one or two people out of a thousand, and they may even end up with a quota system. I can see it now, a leaked TSA memo: "Have you met your hijacker quota for the month?"

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    2. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, this technology will be banned by politicians faster than you can say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      I "think" I'd take the magnet to my head over the present virtual strip search and/or the very not-virtual sexual molestation. I feel like I'm playing a game of Russian roulette when I take my wife on vacation. So far she's in the dark about what the scanners are capable of seeing, however, I dread certain that if she's ever given the rub-down one of us will be going to jail.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    4. Re:Don't tell the TSA by kdemetter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think this will work on politicians. They seem to have a natural resistance against the truth.
      However, since they won't be able to tell lies , maybe it will just shut them up. Which is fine by me :-)

    5. Re:Don't tell the TSA by ChristopherBurg · · Score: 1

      Naw, they'll just exempt themselves from it as they always do when they enact legislation that may negatively impact them.

    6. Re:Don't tell the TSA by hitmark · · Score: 1

      or "i did not take kickbacks from that corporation".

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    7. Re:Don't tell the TSA by bgat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Won't work on politicians, because the magnets affect brain function--- meaning that you need a brain first. No worries here.

      --
      b.g.
    8. Re:Don't tell the TSA by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Politicians don't lie. They just don't believe in the truth.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Don't tell the TSA by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      TSA: What Color is my Shirt
      Man 1: Blue
      TSA: Hold on... (Flips a switch) Now what color is my shirt
      Man 1: Yellow.
      TSA: Are you going to blow up this plane?
      Man 1: Yes.
      TSA: Ok you are free to pass. Next
      Man 2: Hello
      TSA: What Color is my Shirt
      Man 2: Blue
      TSA: Hold on... (Flips a switch) Now what color is my shirt
      Man 2: Yellow.
      TSA: Are you going to blow up this plane?
      Man 2: No.
      TSA: Please stand aside.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, this technology will be banned for politicians faster than you can say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    11. Re:Don't tell the TSA by _0xd0ad · · Score: 3, Funny

      TSA: What Color is my Shirt
      Man 1: Blue
      TSA: Hold on... (Flips a switch) Now what color is my shirt
      Man 1: Yellow.

      I want a shirt like that.

    12. Re:Don't tell the TSA by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      TSA rep: "All passengers will place their heads into the magnetic lie detector and answer the simple question: 'Are you a hijacker?' If you answer in the affirmative, you will be detained. Please remove earrings and other metallic objects."

      And then they'll reverse the magnets and ask "Were you comfortable with the security screening procedures you just experienced?"

    13. Re:Don't tell the TSA by squizzar · · Score: 1

      You want to work for the TSA?

    14. Re:Don't tell the TSA by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      That doesn't reflect well on us, we keep voting them in.

    15. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of things government agencies can do that normal people can't. Politicians aren't even aware of it half the time...

    16. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.

    17. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One would hope so. The politicians who believe in the truth tend to be the most dangerous.

    18. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What we need are more politicians willing to say "hell ya, I slept with her!". Arrogant SOB but at least not a liar. Or a politician smart enough to realize you can't just sweep it under the rug with denials and that small lies turn into big ones, but if you get someone that smart they'd be too smart to go into politics.

    19. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flipped a switch,
      I flipped a switch on blue,
      And it was all yellow.

    20. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Imrik · · Score: 1

      They'll just get someone else to tell them what the truth is, then they won't be lying. Not too different from what we have now actually.

    21. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Posts like these are essentially a facepalm switch.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    22. Re:Don't tell the TSA by jimnorcal · · Score: 1

      No, it won't be banned by politicians. It will be voted into use by politicians with a portion of the law stating that they will not be used on politicians, only people making under a certain amount of money a year. Extra powerful versions will be used on those of different classes/races/ethnicities (but the power of the magnets will be held as state secrets so can't disclosed, even in court under a judges order).

    23. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm protesting the warrant-less TSA searches in my own little way next month. I'm flying out for a friend's wedding,and I'll be wearing a kilt (properly) for the flight.

    24. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You don't give your wife the rub-down already?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    25. Re:Don't tell the TSA by Rival · · Score: 1

      TSA: What Color is your Shirt
      Man 1: Blue...no, Yellow!
      TSA: (Flips a switch)
      Man 1: AAAaaaggghhhh!!!.... (flies off bridge)

  3. But how do they work? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    But how do they work?

    1. Re:But how do they work? by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Neural transmission is like the transmission in your car. Magnets attract the iron in your blood. The little bits of iron jam the gears and prevent normal operation.

      Wait a second! What's this magnet doing behind my ear?

    2. Re:But how do they work? by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Magic.

      In other news, Congolese scientists have determined that dressing in feathers and shaking a rattle cures cancer.

    3. Re:But how do they work? by blueg3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Magnetic fields do no work.

    4. Re:But how do they work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't explain that!

    5. Re:But how do they work? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      They take this large magnet and hit you over the head with it until you talk.

    6. Re:But how do they work? by Pope · · Score: 1

      Imagine 4 monopoles stacked along the edge of a cliff. Brain works the same way!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:But how do they work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They force!

    8. Re:But how do they work? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      That's the best comment I've seen on slashdot in years. Well done!

      I think you've not been modded funny b/c for some reason folks are not seeing the witticism..

    9. Re:But how do they work? by revelation60 · · Score: 1

      Very nice joke :)

    10. Re:But how do they work? by d0nju4n · · Score: 1

      Oh what I would give for mod points right now...

  4. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "magnets to disrupt the area said to be the brain's 'moral compass,' situated behind the right ear, making people temporarily less moral"

    Is that why people on cell phones act like assholes?

    1. Re:Cell Phones by jamiesan · · Score: 3

      Only people with the phones on their left (sinister) ear.

    2. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this also explains why people on the internet are assholes, since many wear headphones

    3. Re:Cell Phones by hitmark · · Score: 2

      acting like assholes and lying like the devil do not have to be synonymous. Some of the most habitual liars are very smooth social animals.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    4. Re:Cell Phones by swanzilla · · Score: 1

      I can't find any fault with your line of reasoning. Disclaimer: I am wearing a giant horseshoe magnet as a hat.

    5. Re:Cell Phones by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Only the ones holding them up to their *right* ear.

    6. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people act like assholes. some people use cell phones.

      what was the question again?!

  5. De-Gauzer by Danathar · · Score: 1

    So...I thought it was strange that everybody said I was an ass hole after I took that 5 dollar bet to put the magnetic tape de-Gauzer to my temple and press the button!

    1. Re:De-Gauzer by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Karl Frederick fucken GAUSS.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:De-Gauzer by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Oops, Carl Friedrich, oh well. Nobody names a kickass weapon a 'Carl-gun' anyway.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:De-Gauzer by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      What does removing gauze have to do with magnets?

    4. Re:De-Gauzer by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      It's just Gauss. Not like he misspelled Tezela's name or anything like that. Can you imagine the fanbois who'd jump such a person?


      :P

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    5. Re:De-Gauzer by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      I want a gauze gun!

    6. Re:De-Gauzer by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tried building a gauze rifle, once. It was very fluffy.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    7. Re:De-Gauzer by Danathar · · Score: 2

      Ok. That was funny :) Yes I misspelled it. So sorry to the fans.

    8. Re:De-Gauzer by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Wow...he had "Fucken" as a second middle name? Incredible. How mean of his parents :)

    9. Re:De-Gauzer by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Given what Tesla accomplished, he might WANT to have changed his name to "Tezela". It sounds WAY cooler.

    10. Re:De-Gauzer by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Nahh... can you imagine going through life named....

      VuVu Tezela?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:De-Gauzer by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I guess it's better than being named Bohner and trying to pass it off as pronounced bainer to everyone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that I could get away with murder, because of some sun spots or something?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      It makes you lie, not gives you Tourette's.

      That said, the whole article has the scent of bullshit. TFA's title says "makes it impossible to lie" and yet the text says it simply tends to make people 'less moral'. The article is inflammatory nonsense hyping research that doesn't appear to make any such sweeping claims.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:Interesting... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, I find the whole thing a bit dubious. It's not shocking to me that it might be possible to disrupt brain activity in such a way that a particular patient couldn't fabricate certain kinds of lies, but the idea that everyone's brain has a clear "lies on" and "lies off" switch that can be activated with a magnet.

      Reading one of TFA:

      The volunteers were presented a series of coloured discs, and told they could tell the truth or lie about the objects' colours while half were being stimulated on the left and half on the right.

      Results showed that the eight volunteers who had their left DPC stimulated lied more often, while the ones with the right DPC stimulated were more likely to tell the truth, researchers said.

      So it sounds like they were given the option of lying about something with no consequences, and they lied more often with one part of the brain stimulated. It doesn't say that it was "impossible" to lie, or even that it made it difficult to lie when strongly motivated to do so. Maybe it didn't directly cause them to be more likely to lie, but made them feel more whimsical or creative and likely to want to lie in a consequence-free environment.

      Then there's the much-overlooked difference between "not-lying" and "telling the truth". I can tell you something false because I'm mistaken, because I'm telling you a fictional story, or because I'm over-simplifying. None of those actions are deceptive in nature, but none of them are "telling the truth".

    3. Re:Interesting... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      They said they could encourage you to lie, not that they could force you not to be able to tell the truth. That's quite different.

      The article says they were more likely to lie, not that they had no choice. (Okay, the second article says they can force it... Sounds like spin to me. They have no idea what they're talking about.)

      Ditto for the truth telling, btw.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Interesting... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Lying implies knowledge that you are intentional not telling the truth. Truthfully telling incorrect information is called 'a mistake'. sometime also could be 'Making bullshit up so as not to disturb my cognitive dissonance'

      And just so people know, this is MRI level magnetic field, not 'Magnets'.

      It does seem that people are less likely to lie. More research needed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the first clue "Estonian researchers" or the rest of it. Seems like a nikken size load of BS to me. You know what else can make you act less moral? The hopes of getting laid. Does that mean that vagina's are magnetic?

    6. Re:Interesting... by jovius · · Score: 1

      I find the claim that they were able to make people unable to tell the truth much more surprising than the one that they were able to make people unable to lie.

      The results are no wonder if you take account the fact that Estonians used to float on the electromagnetic cross currents of giant Russian and Western early warning radars.

    7. Re:Interesting... by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

      I find the claim that they were able to make people unable to tell the truth much more surprising than the one that they were able to make people unable to lie.

      Perhaps the authors of this bullshit research were using their don't tell the truth magnets when they wrote it up.

      --

      Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    8. Re:Interesting... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Could be an effect similar to how various drugs (i include alcohol under that label) makes us disregard or lower our risk aversion.

      So when stimulated on one side, the persons reluctance to lie is heightened while the other lowers it.

      I wonder how it would affect diagnosed sociopaths tho.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    9. Re:Interesting... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      The question is offcourse whether they used the magnets while stating their research.
      Maybe it doesn't work , but because they used the magnets , they are forced to lie , and state that it does work.

    10. Re:Interesting... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I'm attracted to 'em.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    11. Re:Interesting... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that vagina's are magnetic?

      Yes, but they mainly attract assholes.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    12. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lying implies knowledge that you are intentional not telling the truth. Truthfully telling incorrect information is called 'a mistake'. sometime also could be 'Making bullshit up so as not to disturb my cognitive dissonance'

      That is the most charitable explanation of mainstream Republican thought I've ever heard.

    13. Re:Interesting... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that vagina's are magnetic?

      I certainly find them strangely and irresistibly attractive...

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    14. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't surprise me that if you can control one you can control the other. The 'truth' is just about as much a fabrication as a lie, memory just doesn't work the way you think it does.

    15. Re:Interesting... by Technician · · Score: 1

      I wondered how much stronger those magnets are then the one used in MRI. I've not felt the effect of an MRI on my thinking or speech. How is a small local magnet going to do this with a much weaker field that can be "localized". I think this is another pseudo science article. Ouijai boards are proven to work. So do divining rods. Even over unity power generation works for some. I think they all work for the same reasons.

      For the same reasons I don't meddle in the other fringe science, I don't give this much credence.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    16. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the idea that everyone's brain has a clear "lies on" and "lies off" switch

      Don't be TOO surprised. You can reach similar states during meditation, where it's impossible to think negatively.

  7. Magnets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they work?

    1. Re:Magnets! by tmosley · · Score: 1

      You don't ask how troll science works.

  8. No wonder there is less crime in Canada by SirBitBucket · · Score: 3, Informative

    Must be the pull of the North Pole influencing their moral compass...

    1. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a reason they call it moral compass after all. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by s_p_oneil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the article, it sounds like it would depend on whether they're facing east or west at the time. ;-)

      Although this bugs me:
      "The volunteers were presented a series of coloured discs, and told they could tell the truth or lie about the objects' colours while half were being stimulated on the left and half on the right. Results showed that the eight volunteers who had their left DPC stimulated lied more often, while the ones with the right DPC stimulated were more likely to tell the truth, researchers said."

      "More often" is nowhere close to "impossible". They don't say how much more, and it could be a very small percentage. If the percentage was large, I imagine the reporter would've put it in the article to make it sound more impressive and news-worthy (and the research team would've touted it loudly to get more interest and thus more funding). Also, there are no emotions or incentive involved in this case to lie or tell the truth and the subject knows it is a test, so it is more of a game than actually lying. Who knows what made the subjects change how they play the game? Maybe right-handed people get more annoyed by having magnets stuck to the left side of their head than the right side for some reason (right-handed people being the majority), and maybe the more annoyed the test subject is, the more likely they are to play the game negatively.

    3. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you can have a 'very small percentage' when working with only 8 volunteers.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example if 4 of them lied 33 times out of a 100 and the other 4 lied 34 times out of a 100.

    5. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Actually:
      "Inga Karton and Talis Bachmann worked with 16 volunteers..."

      You're right, though. I had skimmed over that part, but that makes the claims even more ridiculous and laughable.

    6. Re:No wonder there is less crime in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary is a joke. I mean seriously, the participants didn't even have the incentive to lie or tell the truth. Imagine the researches had said "you get money every time you tell the truth". Let's see the result now. "Impossible" to tell the truth is a gross overstatement. This is noowhere near mind control. Probably more like "people maybe feel like telling the truth a little bit more when it doesn't matter whether they lie or not , but we're actually not sure but it sounds like a story for slashdot.".

  9. I cannot tell a lie by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...or feel my right arm.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I cannot tell a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paradox. In. Title. Proceeding. To. Self. Destruct.

    2. Re:I cannot tell a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a paradox if he always tells the truth ...

    3. Re:I cannot tell a lie by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. "This sentence is a lie." would be the paradox.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    4. Re:I cannot tell a lie by hedronist · · Score: 1

      If humanity is to survive, we must pledge to eliminate all carbon dioxide from our atmosphere by 2030

      Uhm, if we do that we will ... die. The CO2 partial pressure in your blood is what actually makes your body decide when to breathe.

    5. Re:I cannot tell a lie by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Or even if he lies... Really it's just an exercise in circular logic. I wonder if he's self-destructed yet, or if we were in time to save him.

    6. Re:I cannot tell a lie by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Carbon Dioxide?

      Screw that!

      It's Dihydrogen Monoxide that will destroy us all!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    7. Re:I cannot tell a lie by bgat · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. :)

      --
      b.g.
    8. Re:I cannot tell a lie by amorsen · · Score: 1

      No carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does not mean no carbon dioxide in our blood. We'd need to wear carbon dioxide scrubbers so as to not emit any carbon dioxide to the atmosphere of course.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    9. Re:I cannot tell a lie by sconeu · · Score: 1

      No, It's the Sun, I'm telling you!!!!

      We need to Stamp Out The Sun, because ANY amount of radiation is dangerous!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:I cannot tell a lie by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      We must do something about Doctor Manhattan giving us all cancer!

    11. Re:I cannot tell a lie by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Great, another global warming denier.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:I cannot tell a lie by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I bet you could get a government grant to develop that technology.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:I cannot tell a lie by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Self-reply.

      Forgot the ob-disclaimer:

      When I was at WUSTL in '80-'82, the "no nukes" crowd was going around saying that "any amount of radiation is dangerous", so some friends and I actually went around campus posting "Stamp Out The Sun" signs to point out how stupid that was.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    14. Re:I cannot tell a lie by hawk · · Score: 1

      Not to mention suffocating the plants . . . :)

      hawk

  10. So can a baseball bat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My studies suggest a baseball bat is better.

  11. Federal Government by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    The Feds will be very interested in this. If it pans out, expect portable versions deployed by police departments within five years.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Federal Government by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      I doubt it.... sure, you can prevent me from telling a lie...fine. Its no lie at all that I don't want to continue this conversation, and am unwilling to talk any more without a lawyer present. It is also completely true that I wish to remain silent.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And helmets to be sold that offset the effect...

    3. Re:Federal Government by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      And yet the idiots on Cops talk (and consent to a search) every time. The majority of people seem to think they can talk their way out of a ticket / arrest, probably because they've been told they should always cooperate with police officers no matter what, and they figure not answering would be not cooperating.

      Police would still find plenty of uses for a device like this even though the smarter people will simply shut up like they should.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:Federal Government by Soralin · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that they would use it on the Truth side..

      Do you want to continue this conversation? "Yes"
      Do you want a lawyer present? "No"
      Do you wish to remain silent? "No"
      Did you commit this crime? "Yes"

    5. Re:Federal Government by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      TV goes a long way to perpetuate that, too, by always showing nice, upstanding people talking to the police and only assholes refuse to talk.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:Federal Government by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      The Feds will be very interested in this. If it pans out, expect portable versions deployed by police departments within five years.

      I doubt it.... sure, you can prevent me from telling a lie...fine. Its no lie at all that I don't want to continue this conversation, and am unwilling to talk any more without a lawyer present. It is also completely true that I wish to remain silent.

      No, I don't see it going into police departments first. I see it being implemented in the airports. After your nude scanner photos are taken and distributed they will hook up the brain-magnet machine and simply ask you if you are a terrorist. If you can't lie, then all the terrorists will admit what they are up to. And you don't have a choice to remain silent since you are not under arrest. If you don't cooporate they don't let you fly. And they charge you $11,000 for entering security and not completing it properly. You volunteered to buy a plane ticket, so if the TSA rapist wants to feel you up and alter your brain, you have to comply.

      Don't you just love the "land of the free"!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    7. Re:Federal Government by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      And yet the idiots on Cops talk (and consent to a search) every time.

      Of course they do. Do you think the people who produce Cops are going to use the footage of the suspects who invoke their rights? It would make the cops look like idiots (or the bad guys, depending on how the cop reacts), and might teach people a thing or two about defending themselves against "authority" figures.

      The majority of people seem to think they can talk their way out of a ticket / arrest, probably because they've been told they should always cooperate with police officers no matter what, ...

      And where do you think they learn that?

    8. Re:Federal Government by cobrausn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny story.

      Friend of mine was driving back home from grad school for a short vacation. Got pulled over by some state troopers on the way home. Apparently he was driving a road that is frequented by drug runners from mexico and his little compact car was stuffed to the point of overflowing with random possessions. Trooper asks to search his car. He says no.

      Trooper then calls in a K-9 unit after mumbling something to himself, which walks around the car for many minutes without once alarming (barking). Obviously annoyed at this damned citizen who won't let him do what he wants, the trooper then moves my friend behind his police car and goes back to the car with the K-9 trooper. My friend sees them kick the car to get the dog to bark, and the troopers come over and inform him that the dog barking gives them right to search the car. They then spend the next half hour throwing his possessions all over the side of the highway. They found nothing and went on their way.

      Moral of the story is - it doesn't matter. The more authority we surrender, the more our 'rights' become meaningless in the face of an overwhelming corporate/government bureaucracy that protects its own rights over yours.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    9. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they won't. They don't want truth. They want an admission of guilt and the names of your co-conspirators, regardless of whether you actually did anything wrong.

    10. Re:Federal Government by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Are you a terrorist? No, I am a jihadist.

    11. Re:Federal Government by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those thinking parent's story is just an anecdote and thus not evidence, here's a Chicago Tribune story on some real research into how common this practice is.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    12. Re:Federal Government by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      At $10k per magnet.

    13. Re:Federal Government by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      And you don't have a choice to remain silent since you are not under arrest.

      Ummm...I'm not sure that's how it works. IIRC, the 5th Amendment says that the government cannot (well...legally, anyway) compel me to incriminate myself. Whether or not I have been arrested yet, forcing me to answer that I am a terrorist (assuming it's true) would still be incriminating myself. Just because the Miranda rule says that the police have to advise you of your right to remain silent when you are arrested doesn't necessarily mean that you only have that right when you have actually been arrested. Any actual lawyers care to chime in on this?

      Don't you just love the "land of the free"!

      Well, I did when it actually kind of was...now, not so much.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    14. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I found it easier to buy pepper spray.... you know the kind you use to defend yourself.

      Buy a few small containers of the really nasty stuff. Spray your car exterior down with it. Apply most of it to the lower 50% since the dog isn't tall.

      Here little doggie doggie...... The cops are usually surprised by how repelled the dog is from the car. "He won't even go near it, I wonder why sir are you hiding something?"

      You can also take blood from your female dog and smear it on your car to provoke a false hit if you're serious about wasting the officers time. I've also done this while loading a big safe into my truck. I sped around with one headlight out until I got pulled. Acted purposely suspicious and got their dog to hit on the truck.

      I had 4 padlocked security boxes, 2 small fire safes, and one big one in the back of the truck. The cops gave up after stealing my two safes and finding nothing but anti-cop propaganda inside. They decided to save their money on paying a locksmith to break my big safe.

      I later sued and won all of my money back for the safes as well as another grand for my time.

      Posting AC for obvious reasons behind 8 proxies. It's too much fun to stop......

    15. Re:Federal Government by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If your story is true, which I doubt, you're wasting your time just as much as the cops.

    16. Re:Federal Government by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Really? If anything, it sounds like he's making money out of his hobby.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    17. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This definitely happens. I have lived in Chicago my whole life - this city is extremely prejudice and all the neighborhoods are segregated by race.

    18. Re:Federal Government by mianne · · Score: 1

      This is why any refusal of consent to have one's vehicle, bag, or person searched should always be immediately followed with this bifurcated question: "Am I free to go, or am I under arrest?"

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    19. Re:Federal Government by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If anything, it sounds like he's making money out of his hobby.

      If you believe his story, and if you consider spending time being hassled by cops and in court worth a grand, along with the risk of some cop getting pissed at you and framing you for something.

    20. Re:Federal Government by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Whether or not I have been arrested yet, forcing me to answer that I am a terrorist (assuming it's true) would still be incriminating myself.

      IANAL, but my understanding is that it's easy not to incriminate yourself if you haven't been arrested, because if you haven't been arrested you have the right to get up and leave. The problem is when you're coerced to talk by withholding something you otherwise want/need, e.g. the ability to get on an airplane. You have the right to remain silent, which includes the right to walk away from the machine, but you're given a strong incentive not to.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    21. Re:Federal Government by sjames · · Score: 2

      If our courts were at all sincere about protecting Constitutional rights, police would be required to apologize on the spot, put everything back where they found it, and pay for any damages immediately after any search. After all, innocent people should not have their stuff pawed through or damaged and the subject of a search has not been found guilty in a court of law.

      It would also take all the fun out of the process and so make it less likely to happen unless actually necessary.

    22. Re:Federal Government by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but my understanding is that it's easy not to incriminate yourself if you haven't been arrested, because if you haven't been arrested you have the right to get up and leave.

      Except that TSA says that once you enter the security screening area, you cannot leave without completing the screening process, and there's a $10,000 fine if you do. AFAIK, they have yet to make good on that threat, but if you look on Google, you will find stories that range from merely being escorted out of the airport to actually being arrested when people have elected to discontinue the security screening anyway.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    23. Re:Federal Government by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes but.... even so...

      I also have seen footage of police officers with handheld camcorders taking apart a grow house.... whole 3 story house. Multiple flowering rooms, nursurys etc (yes, pot, duh).... this was at a party. The kid sitting in the corner pipped up "This was my brother's house, would you believe he got off when the courts ruled the warrant invalid?".

      So.... even so.... still.... say....nothing. Ever.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    24. Re:Federal Government by jamesh · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if they strap the truth machine to your head and you tell the truth and they still don't believe you and don't let you be on your way, you have a definite grounds for wrongful detainment (after all, this machine either works or it doesn't right?).

      That said, I think this device would be more useful in a courtroom than an interview room.

    25. Re:Federal Government by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If your story is true, which I doubt, you're wasting your time just as much as the cops.

      At least he's funding his entertainment activities from his own money.

    26. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why cop/drug dog are always paired as a team. The handler can easily tip the the dog to the desired response. If the dogs were truly impartial any dog could be assigned to any handler at the start of their shift. Until dogs are assigned to random handlers both during training and during working shifts it should not be allowed on the street or as admissible in court.

    27. Re:Federal Government by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but my understanding is that it's easy not to incriminate yourself if you haven't been arrested, because if you haven't been arrested you have the right to get up and leave.

      Your understanding is incorrect. Police can detain you (indefinitely in some areas) without formally arresting you. Usually this is so they can find some reason to arrest you.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    28. Re:Federal Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another story proving that most cops are arseholes.

    29. Re:Federal Government by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I Am Not A Lawyer, but the Constitution is pretty darn clear about this: You always have the right to refuse to incriminate yourself. Period. End of story. A good example of this: An officer pulls over a citizen and asks "Do you know how fast you were going?" - the citizen does not have to answer, even though they are not under arrest and have not been informed of their rights. (I haven't been pulled over very often, but my answer to that question is "What did you clock me at?" as calmly and politely as I can muster.)

      The point of Miranda is that in certain police-citizen encounters, the Supreme Court requires that the police give the citizen a quick lesson in their constitutional rights in order for the evidence obtained in that encounter to be legally admissible. But the rights are always there, whether the police tell you about them or not.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  12. Expecting random results? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm no scientist but if you tell people they can lie or tell the truth doesn't that sort of skew the results? I think it would be more interesting if they simply asked questions and did not tell the subjects what the experiment was about while determining if they lied or not behind closed doors.

  13. Immediate Uses For This by ScentCone · · Score: 0

    I request a large array of magnets, stage left, at all political debates, presidential appearances in joint sessions of congress, county council hearings, talk show round tables, to the left of all marketing managers' desks, and of course as special left-wall installations in special kiosks that will become the only places where you can access match.com, slashdot, yelp, and the huffington post.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Immediate Uses For This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WikiLeaks Live Action

    2. Re:Immediate Uses For This by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      This would be fun at political debates, like this one:

      Morbo: Morbo demands an answer to the following question: If you saw delicious candy in the hands of a small child would you seize and consume it?
      Jack Johnson: Unthinkable.
      John Jackson: I wouldn't think of it.
      Morbo: What about you, Mr. Nixon? I remind you you are under a truth-o-scope.
      Nixon's Head: Uh, well, I, uh...the question is-is vague. You don't say what kind of candy, whether anyone is watching or uh... At any rate, I certainly wouldn't harm the child.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Immediate Uses For This by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that not being able to lie does not imply not being able to tell anything but the truth. Many people telling wrong things actually believe them.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Immediate Uses For This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At any rate, I certainly wouldn't harm the child.

      At which point, the Truth-O-Scope buzzer went off.

    5. Re:Immediate Uses For This by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Mod up 1000 times. More over some lies are actually the Truth with a capital T. Ask a conspiracy theorist to lie and say that we did land on the moon. To him, its a lie, but its really True.

      So the counter intelligence angle to this is to tell agents 20 things that the enemy may be interested in 19 of which are false.

      In fact, I'm not sure why they don't do more of that to detect leaks.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    6. Re:Immediate Uses For This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Officially... We don't.

    7. Re:Immediate Uses For This by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Note that not being able to lie does not imply not being able to tell anything but the truth. Many people telling wrong things actually believe them.

      True. Some people really were raised to believe in omniptotent magical beings, and some people really do think that income taxes are only fair if half of the voting population doesn't pay them, etc. I'm not talking about which wrong-headed thing someone believes - but I'd like to know what they actually are, rather than what they're panderingly saying. That would also cut down on the "elect me and the waters will recede" sort of nonsense.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:Immediate Uses For This by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      WikiLeaks Live Action

      But only if we get to use it on Assange, too.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:Immediate Uses For This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lie cannot be the truth, regardless of the person's beliefs, precisely *because* whether something is a lie or truth depends on whether they believe it to be true.

      You're confusing Facts with Truth. You can tell the Truth, and still say something that is counter-factual, it just means that you believed that what you said was true.

  14. Interesting... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    I find the claim that they were able to make people unable to tell the truth much more surprising than the one that they were able to make people unable to lie.

    While fun and useful, lying is somewhat cognitively demanding: You have to synthesize and deliver a contracfactual statement, you can't just remember it because it didn't happen. There has been some previous speculation that you should be able to detect lying, based on the greater mental effort(and distributed across more brain regions effort) involved, vs. the recall activity required to tell the truth.

    That you can knock-out truth-telling(without just inducing aphasia or amnesia temporarily, which is a bit heavy handed) is much more surprising.

  15. Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What woundrously wonderful research! What will they think of next...

  16. Shielding by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Screw metal plates, I'm getting a faraday cage installed into (in lieu of) my skull!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  17. Original paper? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    This experiment sounds like it should be easy for a DIYer to reproduce. I can rig up an electromagnet helmet to prevent any placebo effect (no changing headgear) and make it double-blind.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Original paper? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Depends on the strength of the magnet and whether or not the field needs to be oscillating in a particular way for it to work.

      The wonders of mass-produced rare-earth magnets have certainly brought ~1tesla surface strengths down into the realm of hobbyists, and you can get fairly punchy electromagnets with fairly basic tools; but if it requires bulk superconductors, cryogens, or reasonably precise high-frequency control of large currents, that can get tricky...

    2. Re:Original paper? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Sigh.. It's an MRI level magnetic fields, not 'magnets' so no, you can't do it in your home. Unless you happen to be very wealthy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Original paper? by lurker1997 · · Score: 1

      Its not a static magnetic field, like with a permanent magnet at home, or with an MRI either. It is a TMS coil, which means repeated short burts of high magnetic field. The field does not stimulate the brain directly, but induces eddy currents which can modify brain function. TMS is effectively a friendly name for low (or sometimes not so low) level electric shock therepy.

  18. Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by goffster · · Score: 1

    Anybody know anything about them.
    The article itself is very sketchy:

    A random sampling of "16" ?
    No mention of how strong a magnet.
    Was there a "tendency" not to lie, or was it an on/off switch ?

    1. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Was there a "tendency" not to lie, or was it an on/off switch ?

      I saw a different article on this yesterday. It was a reduced tendency, not an off switch. The reduction was a significant but small percentage (IIRC on the order of 15-20%).

      I'd like to see the study repeated with vodka. Wait - did they control for vodka?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      It's a tendancy. from the fine article: Remarkably, those stimulated on the left side fibbed a great deal more, those on the right showed much more honesty. The title is a lie.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    3. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

      "No mention of how strong a magnet."
      You win a prize for asking the correct question.

      It is a TMS. so we are talking about a MRI level magnetic fields.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation

      here is a slightly better article:
      http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128284.400-powerful-magnets-hamper-our-ability-to-lie.html

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      "Powerful magnets hamper our ability to lie" - New Scientist's article title
      "Magnetic Pulses to the Brain Make it Impossible to Lie: Study" - IB Times sensationalist article title

      A couple very important lines from the article make it clear that the NS title is correctly worded, and the IBT article title is a straight lie:
      'The volunteers were presented a series of coloured discs, and told they could tell the truth or lie'
      '"Spontaneous choice to lie more or less can be influenced by brain stimulation," researchers Karton and Bachmann wrote in Behavioural Brain Research.'

      So the study had nothing to do with whether it was possible to lie based on magnetic interference. The study only checked whether a subject is more likely to lie or be truthful in a game where the outcome is meaningless.

      Any test about truth taking has to have some risk or some reward associated with it. In this study, the subjects had no real reason to lie, and some of them still lied even with the magnetic interference. I'm not really sure how this even warrants a story, unless you accept the sensationalist title of the IBT article.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    5. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      So was the title writer sitting on the left or right side of the magnet generating the test field?

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    6. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that they were given permission to lie, making morality even less of a factor.

    7. Re:Both researchers From Bachmann Lab by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Moderators, please mod the parent post up to a billion (or a billion + 1).
      It's always refreshing when someone looks at a story of a study and is able to peel back the sensationalist bullshit covering it to reveal what conclusions could actually be drawn.

  19. how credible is this? by sribe · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously, I didn't know Elbonia was known for neuropsychological research ;-)

    1. Re:how credible is this? by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Of course it is. That and mud. They go together like... like... neuropsychological research and mud :-)

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    2. Re:how credible is this? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      They're also known for their pasta inspired dances; namely, the Elbonian Macarena

      yeah, I'll be here all week..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:how credible is this? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I mean, seriously, I didn't know Elbonia was known for neuropsychological research ;-)

      Yes, they've completely mapped the neurons surrounding the bendy part in the middle of the arm.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:how credible is this? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Vivaaaaaaaaaaaaa Las Elboniaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

      Where prostitution and gambling are not only legal, they're MANDATORY!

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  20. Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Modern neuroscience is killing any wiggle-room that might have remained regarding souls and free will. As I've mentioned before, neuroscientists, ethicists, and legal scholars are concerned that "my brain made me do it" will become a reasonable courtroom defense. (No, I'm not talking about the traditional "insanity defense".)

    We will eventually be forced to re-think a lot of cherished beliefs about brains, minds, and behavior.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Modern neuroscience is killing any wiggle-room that might have remained regarding souls and free will.

      'Souls' was always a nonsensical concept. Free will isn't being destroyed, though; just becoming a little more rigorously defined. You still decide what you do, it's just that the mechanism of how you do that is being nailed down. Past definitions of free will often included magic or randomness in an attempt to avoid causality. Instead, it needs to be reconciled with causality.

    2. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I have dualist free will! It's just that, er, my acausal free-will soul-node-thing freely chooses to act precisely as though it were actually a lump of brain-meat wholly determined by physical causation! Disprove that, skeptics!

    3. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      We will eventually be forced to re-think a lot of cherished beliefs about brains, minds, and behavior.

      That rather is the point of doing the research, is it not?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is still a strong argument for some free will.

      Right now, it looks like are day to day response may not actually be free will; but thinking and evaluate and changes response might be.

      But, yeah it is challenging everything about who we are, and in 2 decades we will have it pretty much known.
      Of course, it can't disprove the idea of a soul because there isn't any proof it exists now, so how will not having any proof later change someone belief?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Modern neuroscience is killing any wiggle-room that might have remained regarding souls and free will. 'Souls' was always a nonsensical concept. Free will isn't being destroyed, though; just becoming a little more rigorously defined. You still decide what you do, it's just that the mechanism of how you do that is being nailed down. Past definitions of free will often included magic or randomness in an attempt to avoid causality. Instead, it needs to be reconciled with causality.

      You can still decide what you do, until they put the magnet to your head and make you tell a lie. Then they throw you in jail for lying under oath. Couldn't you claim that the magnets made you do it?

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    6. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "My brain made me do it" cannot be a valid defence because I am my brain. There's no independent "I" from which I could separate my brain.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Dualism was destroyed by f=ma. Everything since has just been confirmation.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      There is still a strong argument for some free will.

      Which is?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The placebo and nocebo effects strongly challenge the reductionist view of the mind. That the mind, apart from the brain yet using the brain, can change the body, is a deep challenge for anti-dualists.

    10. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeap, but at the end of the day, you're still going to have to decide what to do. That is where your freedom (or the illusion thereof) comes from.

      Your brain is you more than anything else. If someone's brain forced them to do something, then their brain should be punished. Ted Bundy might have been utterly insane, but we can't leave people like that free on the street. Hopefully modern neuroscience will find ways to fix people like that.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You can't reconcile "free will" with causality. That's what the "free" means. If your will is subject to cause and effect, then it is not free.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow...seriously? You feel that a non-peer reviewed experiment with magnets in Estonia is definitive enough to say all that. You, Sir, are a scholar of the highest order.

    13. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, we'll just jail the brain.

    14. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      The only things modern neuroscience is killing are bogus philosophical notions such as the mind-body dichotomy and any variant of "free will" that claims an individual's mind should be able to perform any decision without regard for the current state of his brain (which is obviously a corollary to the mind-body dichotomy).

      Legitimate notions of "free will", which recognize that the mind is dependent on the brain for its existence and proper function, still remain.

    15. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free fall" is both deterministic and free. "Free will" could be the same.

    16. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "my brain made me do it" will become a reasonable courtroom defense

      That's not a problem as long as the court can say, "you are free to go, but your brain is sentenced to 20 years..."

    17. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As I've mentioned before, neuroscientists, ethicists, and legal scholars are concerned that "my brain made me do it" will become a reasonable courtroom defense."

      How? Does the fact that we're coming to understand how the brain makes decisions somehow make us less responsible for the decisions it (and thus 'I') arrive at?

    18. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the universe is holographic in nature (which it probably is), why is the notion of a soul nonsensical? Supposing that we essentially made up of cellular automata on the n-1 dimensional surface of the holographic universe, then couldn't a soul be something like a standing metapattern in your particular grouping of cells?

      Oh, you meant the notion of a ghostly spirit, which, okay then. But if that metapattern held crucial and pieces of information about you, how would it be functionally different than the traditional notion of the soul? 1) holds your "essense"; 2) unobservable from within the universe; 3) observable, copyable, etc. from some ostensible vantage point outside of the universe.

    19. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Such defenses will require us to rethink "punishments" as well.

      I think there is at least one neuro-scientist that suggests the focus should shift from from crass punishment to the criminals likelihood of repeating the offense, and tailoring the legal responses based on that.

      So if a medical examination suggests a high likelihood of repetition, various measures to reduce or remove that would come into effect. Still, there may be some crimes that are considered so hideous that anything other then zero chance of repetition is grounds for having the person simply locked away.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    20. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by blackanvil · · Score: 1

      Maybe it will lead to actual treatment and rehabilitation of criminals, instead of the current punishment model. Or even the restructuring of our "Justice" system to separate true criminal activity from truly victimless crimes. Oh, who am I fooling, this will be abused like every other technology, used to throw the underclasses into some hellhole via forced "confessions" and gullible juries.

    21. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by hitmark · · Score: 1

      One mans crazy is another mans asset. Some of the best soldiers, for instance, may be unable to function inside your average society. But given them a battlefield and clear goals and they will thrive.

      Btw, i think there was a documentary on the Falklands war where a British soldier voiced the opinion that there was three kinds of soldier. The first was the kind that wet their pants and refused to leave the safety of cover at the first sign of danger. The second was the kind that ran at danger with a slasher grin of glee. The third was the kind that would approach danger with a grim determination to protect others from it.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    22. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by MMORG · · Score: 1

      In that case our legal system will simply have to move away from the idea that prison is a punishment for wrongdoing to the idea that prison is a holding place for defectives. At the end of the day it doesn't really matter if you *chose* to murder that person, or if your brain chemistry led you inexorably to murder that person and there was nothing you could do about it. The fact is that we don't want to let people with a propensity for murdering people run around loose in society, so either way you need to be removed from society.

      In fact, in the absence of the idea of free will, it makes a lot of sense to not have graduated prison sentences (punishment fitting the crime) at all and just go to a system of one-strike-and-you're-put-away-for-life. If you're demonstrably defective and your brain chemistry can't allow you to behave in a socially acceptable way, then you need to be locked up. And if you're defective then there's really no sense in ever letting you out again, is there? It's not like a a prison sentence is going to teach you not to mis-behave; your initial defense was that you had no choice about your actions in the first place.

      Of course, what we're actually *likely* to get in real life is the worst parts of both philosophies - the idea that only people who made free-will choices to be evil can be punished/penalized/incarcerated, but no one is capable of free-will choices (we're all at the mercy of our chemical makeup), therefore no action is ever taken to deter or prevent anti-social behavior.

    23. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      The concept of any magic free will separate from the mechanisms of our mind should have been discarded long ago.

      That said, until we come up with a much better description of those mechanisms, it's still a very useful abstraction, on a legal, philosophical, and social level. "Free will" is just the black box of machinery that produces our thoughts and actions. Until we can reliably predict outputs for all inputs, treating it as being independent and unpredictable is about the best we can do.

    24. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, quantum physics throw the need for causality right out the window. Problem solved.

    25. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not a scientific argument. A rational/philosophical one. If the existence of "free will" somehow violates causality, then it's inherently disprovable by science. There's only so much you can do with science (i.e. find out every last piece of causality and determinism, and build your case on that). Just like we can't observe the universe 4 billion years ago. We have lots of evidence about what things were like, but we will NEVER have first-hand observation.

    26. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And the insanity defense is no longer going to be a not-guilty. How can it be? If your brain made you do it, then your brain made you do it. Insanity, in this regard, would just be an extreme version of the same.

    27. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not quite - if the brain is deterministic, then it can be reliably brainwashed to rehabilitation as well. Prison sentences are a deterrent, not a solution. If one won't be deterred, their brain must be altered to truly rehabilitate them. Brains damaged beyond repair are locked away for life.

    28. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by vux984 · · Score: 1


      Your brain is you more than anything else. If someone's brain forced them to do something, then their brain should be punished.

      Why? If we accept that actions are a function of brain-state, then "Punishment" presumably works by altering the brain-state to one where it will in future decide the desired course of action.

      If we can bring about the desired brain-state with a pill instead of 30 years of incarceration, why not skip the incarceration and take the pill instead.

      In any case, prison has proven to be a very blunt, ineffective, and expensive tool to bring about desirable changes in peoples brain chemistry.

      Ted Bundy might have been utterly insane, but we can't leave people like that free on the street.

      Right. But putting him in a cage isn't working either.

      Hopefully modern neuroscience will find ways to fix people like that.

      Bingo.

      The only problem is that once you can change somones personality directly at will... you can change someones personality directly at will.... there is potential for real evil there. If you thought designer babies were immoral... how about designer personalities applied to existing people, altering who they fundamentally are.

      In any case... your right... we can't have criminals walking the streets...putting them in cages is barbaric and ineffective... but perhaps altering their personalities isn't ethical either, and puts us on a very slippery slope to very evil ends.

      I mean... sexual orientation is brain-chemistry too. We could potentially alter it... or being enthusiastic about math... or social awkwardness... if we can change a sociopath, we can change regular people. Next centuries... "extreme makeover" might not just be new hair, clothes, and some plastic tits... you might get a few new personality traits, alter how you feel about exercise and diet... oh... and an unshakable loyalty to Nike, the shows sponsor.

    29. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      What if we determine that based upon all verifiable evidence, "my brain made me do it" is an difficult to dispute fact. There's an objective reality out there independent of what humans think it is, and it might in fact be that in that reality there is no free will. Whether or not you or I or anyone else wish there were.

    30. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      This idea overlooks the inherent plasticity of the brain, also a scientifically proven fact. People's brains can change, and so can their propensity for anti-social behavior.

    31. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ...are concerned that "my brain made me do it" will become a reasonable courtroom defense.

      It's fine as long as they are also open to re-programming.

    32. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      It's not a courtroom defense. Objectively speaking, your brain did make you do it, but so what? Metaphysical questions about souls and free will are completely outside the realm of the law. The proper goal of the legal system is not to assign moral blame, but to promote social welfare by enforcing certain standards of conduct.

      The "insanity defense" is not based on the idea that insane people are allowed to commit crimes. It's based on the idea that in some cases, it's more useful to send someone to a mental hospital than a prison. Then there's the idea of "temporary insanity", which is based on the idea that in exceptional situations, even a healthy, well meaning person cannot control their actions, so there is no social benefit to punishing them.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
    33. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hopefully they'll throw your brain in prison for making you do it.

    34. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still keep wondering why that's a legal problem. Your brain did it, we lock up your brain.

      In fact, the effect would be possibly the other way around. Since your brain did it, and we can't fix that (yet), we'd better lock you up until we can fix your brain. Not a penalty, mind you, just to protect everyone else from a defective brain. And therefore there's no parole, no early release. The public wouldn't mind; it would create the image of tougher punishment even if it wasn't formally a punishment.

    35. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Right. But putting him in a cage isn't working either.

      How many people did he kill while he was in jail? How many did he kill after he was executed? Seems like it IS working, to me.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    36. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by vux984 · · Score: 1

      How many people did he kill while he was in jail? How many did he kill after he was executed? Seems like it IS working, to me.

      It didn't change him so that he wasn't a serial killer. He didn't feel remorse... so the punishment rehabilitation failed completely.

      Sure it succeeded by physically isolating him from the rest of society and mitigated the damage he could do.

      But what about a mugger? Or a guy who shoplifts? Or defrauds old women? Or gropes people on the bus? Or pees in a public fountain? Or cheats on his taxes? Or hacks into a computer?

      Prison might prevent people from doing this while they are there, and killing them will stop them from doing it ever. But it RARELY makes people better people and unless you plan to incarcerate for live, or execute everyone who is guilty of a crime... most of them are going to be back in with the public. Mostly no better than they were before. (And many worse.)

    37. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      unless you plan to incarcerate for live, or execute everyone who is guilty of a crime..

      That's exactly what laws like California's "Three strikes you're out" are designed to do......keep people who can't resist crime in some place where they are isolated from the rest of us.

      Psycho-altering everyone who shoplifts, pees in public fountains, gropes people, and cheats on taxes sounds like some kind of futuristic dystopia. I'm not sure we really want to go there.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    38. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reply to 'my brain made me do it' is 'my brain is making me lock you up for a long time'.

    39. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that depends on your definition of free will. there doesn't need to be any magic or absolute determination for there to be responsibility. this is first year philosophy stuff by the way e.g. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbow_Room_%28book%29

    40. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbow_Room_%28book%29

    41. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Though we might realize people have less free will than religion/spirituality has suggested, we as a society can still lock up people who break social contract.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    42. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by Timmyisinthewell · · Score: 1

      Prison changes the "cost function" we use to make decisions. Punishment is to be avoided; if ( Benefit - (Risk * Punishment) ) is negative for an individual, they won't take that undesired action. It matters only a little from society's perspective if the guy is rehabilitated. He's only one crook. The many dissuaded from crime are the real payoff.

    43. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Psycho-altering everyone who shoplifts, pees in public fountains, gropes people, and cheats on taxes sounds like some kind of futuristic dystopia. I'm not sure we really want to go there.

      I don't disagree.

      But putting them in cages for their rest of their lives isn't dystopic? (Not to mention a huge drain on the non-criminal public's resources.)

    44. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That assumes people are rational in their decision making.

      The government has in several occasions made a dramatic change in the prescribed punishment (adding mandatory prison time, or increasing its minimum length, or doubling or trebling the prescribed fines...) to a crime to make the Punishment greater. There has NEVER been a corresponding drop in the rate of that crime as a result.

      The idea that people committing the crimes are evaluating the cost function before acting is thoroughly debunked in my opinion.

    45. Re:Alas, poor Dualism, I knew they well by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      oh, it's more like medieval! lol

      Of course, if we lock people up who shoplift, pee in public fountains, grope people, or cheat on taxes, for the rest of their lives, it's quite harsh, because the crime is small.

      If somehow we find that we can psycho-alter these people so they can be cured, then I am not opposed to that (although it does sound like Clockwork orange). I was just pointing out that a lot of the problem these people present is solved by locking them up and killing them. Personally I'd prefer locking them up rather than killing them, so we can study them psychologically, but that is me.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  21. *sigh* by ultramk · · Score: 1

    OK, lets add this up.

    Results of study appear to be conclusive and immensely counter-intuitive? Check.
    Research is from a former Soviet bloc country? Check.
    Study size is small? 16 people, so check.
    No details on methodology? Check.
    Study is published in popular press, not peer-reviewed journal? Nope, Behavioural Brain Research is peer-reviewed and appears pretty legit.

    Well, if this is true and accurate, it could be completely ground-breaking in any number of fields. Fascinating if other teams are able to reproduce the results. Can you even imagine a world with reliable truth-telling machines? It's mind-boggling. The only reason that polygraphs haven't completely revolutionized our society is that they are completely BS, voodoo junk-science.

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    1. Re:*sigh* by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And this may turn out to be junk science as well.

      TMS has many red flags. Cures a ton of different things, studies are always small, and the larges effect can only be found in meta studies.; however there is still plenty of room for study, and I hope the effects on the brain are real, and usable..

      IF the effects haven't been improved upon in 10 years, then it should be set aside and we should move on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:*sigh* by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Nope, Behavioural Brain Research is peer-reviewed and appears pretty legit..

      It is legit, but it's an Elsevier journal which means it is just one of literally hundreds of low impact, not so difficult to get published journals. They are peer reviewed, but that doesn't mean the research is correct nor particularly interesting. It's also behind a paywall.... Sigh.

      The birdcage of research is papered with Elsevier journals....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Altering the moral compass does not equal making a truth-telling machine. Let's take the classic R. D. Laing double-bind scenario - no matter which option you choose, you will be "wrong". When X = !X, then inverting X has no effect. This can happen when telling the truth can hurt someone you care about. As far as the brain's ability to determine "right" and "wrong" are concerned, someone is going to get hurt (bad) no matter what is said. Intensifying the dilemma wouldn't do much for you.

      Second, it's not counter-intuitive in that magnetic fields have been used numerous times in research in the US to alter the state of different parts of the brain. We also know that the electical fields from the brain can be read via EEG and we know that a change in magnetic field will cause a change in electrical field such as to oppose the change in the magnetic field. Thus, we know that anything electrical in the brain can be controlled magnetically - to a point. (The limit being that you're altering the electrical state of absolutely everything in the brain within the magnetic field, which can get exceptionally messy.)

    4. Re:*sigh* by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      The development of a foolproof lie detector that REALLY worked would alter civilization in ways so profound and far-reaching that the technology would probably face overwhelming resistance to its adoption. Its widespread acceptance would shake the modern legal system to its foundation, revolutionize diplomacy, destroy countless careers and reputations overnight and make the media the single most powerful political force on the planet. Religion would be rendered impotent as a source of both political authority and spiritual comfort.

      The control of the flow of information, and of the machines that verify its validity, would become paramount to those who wished to rule.

    5. Re:*sigh* by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      "Peer reviewed" is meaningless unless you know who those peers are.
      An idiot, by definition, has idiot peers.

  22. Balls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, the researchers noted that the success rate of inducing truth increased where the researcher also placed two powerful opposite-pole magnets on each side of the subject's testicles, the success rate increased further where the subject perceived that the researcher was losing his grip on said magnets.

  23. Sounds like Hype or BS by jd.schmidt · · Score: 1

    No doubt you use different parts of your brain for telling the truth vs. lying and disabling the associated part or conduit would make lying harder. But unless something is lost in translation, this story is hype. It isn't a simple on/off switch.

  24. Explains a lot about mobile phone use by lucidlyTwisted · · Score: 1

    "Sorry honey I'm stuck in work, yeah I know it's Friday...yeah...sorry...the noise?...oh, that's the cleaners...sounds like a bar?...hahahaha you funny...they've just got the radio on....don't you trust me?...I'll try to be quick...yes...love you too....bye!"
    Right chaps, my round it is?

  25. Magnets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they WORK?

    Another reminder that rTMS is a real thing and is still being used to figure out what parts of the brain do what. It's still not fine-grained enough to do anything but stimulate various areas.

  26. Invisible airplanes by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    if the comic books are right

    1. Re:Invisible airplanes by rossdee · · Score: 1

      It wasn't totally invisible, more like transparent. You could see Lynda Carter inside it.

      I'd say it might have been made of transparent aluminum except that wasn't invented until 1984.

  27. 'more' likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the article quoted clearly states the subjects were 'More' likely and 'Less' likely not they 100% told/did not tell the truth.

    bad slashdot summary again.

  28. It is not a joke. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    It is actually the age old puzzle, "two doors, tiger behind one, princess behind the other. One guard always tells the truth, the other always lies. What question would you ask ...". Some poor Estonian tried to translate this puzzle from Sanskrit to Estonian and ended up writing it as a research paper instead.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  29. Now you see.. by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Now you see why I wear a tin foil hat.

  30. That's why women are so Evil by dlhm · · Score: 1

    They have those earrings with the magnetic backers... I knew something was up! wee need to put the magnent on the right and a regular one of the left!

    --
    Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit!
  31. Crowdsourced version by macraig · · Score: 1

    So I guess we could crowdsource honesty by sending people to a scrap yard and walking them under one of those auto magnets? Hopefully the percentage of people with metal plates in their heads and Borg implants won't be too high....

  32. Damn by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Damn, we attached the magnet to the wrong side of the post-doctorate student's head when he was writing that study.

  33. You go too far in your conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you go too far in your conclusion.

    All they may have shown in this study is that personality is affected by the brain. Something we already knew.

    It does not mean (as you suggest) that a soul does not exist because our personality, consciousness, etc. can be the result of both a soul AND a brain. I'm an MIT graduate with many friends in MIT's brain and cognitive sciences department. I've repeatedly asked my friends in that department about what is known about consciousness. They one and all, give me a similar answer -- that what consciousness is remains an open question despite years of research into the matter.

  34. Headline Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The headline is completely misleading, TFA:

    The volunteers were presented a series of coloured discs, and told they could tell the truth or lie about the objects' colours while half were being stimulated on the left and half on the right.

    Results showed that the eight volunteers who had their left DPC stimulated lied more often, while the ones with the right DPC stimulated were more likely to tell the truth, researchers said.

    1. Re:Headline Misleading by davec727 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the headline couldn't be more wrong. These subjects had no incentive or reason to lie or to tell the truth - they had a free and unbiased choice between lying and truth-telling, and the magnets affected their arbitrary decision. It's not like they wanted to lie and couldn't.

  35. Bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they always reject you not because they are evil, but because you are just plain creepy?

    Posting anonymously because there are a lot of nuts on Slashdot who think, "Teh wimin rejected mee so they ar teh 33-vil!!11!" and will mod down anyone who points out the truth.

    1. Re:Bitter? by dlhm · · Score: 1

      They don't reject me at all... they are just evil.. like vampire bats, sharks and snakes..

      --
      Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit!
  36. Enhanced Interrogation Techniques . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just got kinder and gentler. Rumsfeld will be *so* pissed.

  37. ELECTRO-Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poorly worded article - they used Electro-magnets (Trans-Cranial Magnetic Stimulation).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation
    This is a well-known effect within academic circles, it must be a slow news day.

  38. Moral Compass Now A Literal Expression? by SomewhatRandom · · Score: 1

    Yes, "We will eventually be forced to re-think a lot of cherished beliefs about brains, minds, and behavior."... by magnets.

  39. Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ask the test subject the big questions, like 'is there a god?' and such

  40. Buy your loved one a magnetic pillow! by Kaffien · · Score: 0

    All of a sudden she forgot the word no. sweeeeet.

  41. The Answer by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple, ask them nothing, walk away. The puzzle doesn't define that you have to talk to the guards, nor open a door, nor that finding the princess is better. Maybe you're Steve Irwin, Croc Hunter, looking for the exotic animal. Maybe you don't care. Maybe you are a woman and the guards are irresistibly cute, and happy that both are behind the door and can have both guards to yourself.

    The trick to the riddle is that it is founded on an entire series of common assumptions. The fact that we fear tigers, the fact that we "want" princesses, the fact that the guards are to be asked or have any real authority to block doors, and the fact that we have to find out what is behind the doors by asking a question based on the perceived morality of the guards... THAT is interesting.

    --
    I8-D
  42. I am my brain by invid · · Score: 1

    Since I am my brain then the argument "my brain made me do it" means that "I made me do it". I don't see how this kills the idea of free-will. Since I am the chemical and electrical processes in my brain then whatever causes them to do what they do IS me. There is no philosophical difference with the situation if you had a magical soul. After all, whatever would compose a magical soul has to follow some sort of rules to come up with whatever decision it makes, just as physics and chemistry underlie the decisions I make.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    1. Re:I am my brain by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      "Free Will" is just a convenient phrase that means "the process that leads to the decisions that I make". Whether on not we understand how that works as a chemical process is irrelevant.

  43. old story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has already been discussed in 2000 at the RNC...

  44. Bullshit summary by ornel · · Score: 1
    From the original article abstract:

    "...the tendency to stick to truthful answers can be manipulated by stimulation targeted at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Right hemisphere stimulation decreases lying, left hemisphere stimulation increases lying. Spontaneous choice to lie more or less can be influenced by brain stimulation."

    "force you"? "make it impossible"? Where is that bullshit coming from? It shows a significant change, that's very different from the absolute phrases used in the summary.

    1. Re:Bullshit summary by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Give up! You cannot defeat the /. hyperbolic echo chamber!

  45. The Classic Riddle... by XiaoMing · · Score: 2

    The next sentence was made with a magnet on my left hemisphere.

    The previous sentence was made with a magnet on my right hemisphere.

    Which one is tru-WHO GIVES A SHIT I HAVE NO MORALS WARWRWERWARWAAWKLERJA

    1. Re:The Classic Riddle... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      This sentence is false!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  46. It was on TED already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ted.com look it up

  47. the perfect soldier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    future helmets for soldiers will contain magnets that will effectively switch off empathy, morality, ethical behavior giving us the perfect soldier

  48. wow by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sounds about as credible as phrenology, so I'll await confirmation.

    But in the meantime, think about the impact this would have on society if there was truly a way (temporary, harmless) to prevent people from lying.

    How many marriages would survive?
    What would happen if 435 congressmen simultaneously "decided to retire...immediately"?

    Would the resulting society even be recognizable?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:wow by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      think about the impact this would have on society if there was truly a way (temporary, harmless) to prevent people from lying.

      Already covered http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Machine-James-Halperin/dp/0345412885/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1315593348&sr=8-1 Not a bad read. I couldn't suspend my disbeleif regarding the QA on the software.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:wow by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Actually, it sounds almost infinitely more credible than phrenology because phrenology had zero evidence or mechanism to support its claims, while magnetic stimulation of the brain actually has some evidence of efficacy and proposes a mechanism.

      I'm not saying this is necessarily *true* or *correct* (and in fact, I rather doubt it's what it's being hyped as - for sure I agree with you there) but it's decidedly more credible than phrenology.

      Getting at your other stuff - the changes to society - there's a book (I won't call it a good one or even a likely one) called the Truth Machine about the invention of a device that could always detect lies and how it changed society. It's somewhat interesting, though I think a bit naive in a lot of ways.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    3. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds about as credible as phrenology, so I'll await confirmation.

      Agreed. How in the world is a test done on 16 people considered a conclusive test with results applicable to all people. Just because 16 people happen to be less likely to tell a lie when a magnet was applied to their brain does not mean that when such a magnet is applied in this precise way it is therefore "IMPOSSIBLE" (quoting article title) to lie.

    4. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds about as credible as phrenology, so I'll await confirmation.

      But in the meantime, think about the impact this would have on society if there was truly a way (temporary, harmless) to prevent people from lying.

      How many marriages would survive?
      What would happen if 435 congressmen simultaneously "decided to retire...immediately"?

      Would the resulting society even be recognizable?

      Sounds like a good plot for a Hollywood blockbuster.

      Make the cause a hithero unidentified virus which was dormant in the human genome until activated by a particularly nasty winter 'flu epidemic.

  49. Not really by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

    Nobody's stopping you from answering the riddle with "I'd open both doors, butt-fuck the tiger and then have a circle-jerk with the guards while we watched it maul the princess."

    Nobody but yourself, anyway.

    --
    I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
  50. Bad study, bad summary, bad editing by kwerle · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    "Spontaneous choice to lie more or less can be influenced by brain stimulation," researchers Karton and Bachmann wrote in Behavioural Brain Research.

    That's it. Based on a single study of 16 people in one test.

    This isn't news. It hardly qualifies as gossip.

    1. Re:Bad study, bad summary, bad editing by Linzer · · Score: 1

      Thank you for finally mentioning the numbers! They take a sample of 16 people, split it in two groups of eight, and publish statistical differences between the samples... It's appalling.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
  51. Misleading summary by binford2k · · Score: 2

    That's not at all what the study showed/claimed/whatever. People were MORE LIKELY to tell the truth with the magnetic treatment. That's a far cry from force.

  52. Gotta have a Futurama thread here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already knew magnets applied to the head can make certain individuals sing bad folk-songs.

  53. Anyone else see the problem with lie detectors? by Nox3173 · · Score: 1

    Have you ever been asked a question that was phrased in such a way that the truthful answer would make you sound like a complete ass or guilty as sin? Politicians and Lawyers are known for asking pointed character assassination questions, why not police or your boss? I'm not saying I'm not a fan of the magnet theory, I'm just saying that anything is worthwhile if used responsibly and I have a great skepticism that anything we create will be used responsibly.

  54. No Bender jokes yet ? by dgavin · · Score: 1

    It was already known that magnets applied to the head can make certain individuals sing bad folk-songs.

    1. Re:No Bender jokes yet ? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Put the magnet on the other side of his head and, "No, she will not, in fact, be coming around the mountain when she comes."

  55. Surprising there isn't MORE "truth-serum" research by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, torture is unreliable (even before being nebulously immoral). One would think that by now there would have been more research on a drug or tool or other non-destructive way to loosen people's tongues. Of course it doesn't get you the *truth*, it just gets you honesty about what the person *believes* to be true. (Christopher Anvil, forgot the name of the story, had a mind-reader find out the hard way that reading people's minds didn't make him omniscient; it made him omni-opinient.)

    And Jack Bauer would have been out of work much faster . . . See also "Veridicator" (H. Beam Piper), "fast-penta" (Lois McMaster Bujold), probably dozens of others.

  56. MIT study proves why... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

    ...cell phone users can be such jerks.

    The magenet in the cell phones speaker is disrupting their moral center....

  57. Two guards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You come to a fork in the road. One way leads to certain doom, the other to salvation. At the fork is a powerful magnet with two guards standing to either side...

  58. DEMAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I demand all politicians be made to wear devices that make them tell the truth!

    There.. that'll get this technology banned in no time flat.

  59. Elbonia scientists strike again! by i_b_don · · Score: 1

    Ok... who couldn't read this article with out thinking of Dilbert and these guys: http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/images/elbonian_computer.gif

    d

    --
    all language nazi's will burne in heil!
  60. Thumb screws do the same job cheaper by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    Why waste your time with a magnet when a simple vice grip applied in the right location can do the same thing?

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  61. Oh that's why! by lothar4ever · · Score: 1

    Now i know why Lie to Me was canceled :O

  62. I got news for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be surprised to know how many of us have been routinely calling you an asshole long before that.

  63. TMS is not a magnet by 3ryon · · Score: 1

    A couple of clarifications are in order.

    First TMS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation) is not akin to putting a magnet on your skull....so don't embarrass yourself by having your spouse wear a special hat while you ask them about their infidelity.

    Second, the researches never said that the technique makes it impossible to lie or tell the truth. They said that subjects were more likely to lie or tell the truth depending on the location stimulated.

    Third, it really isn't much of a surprise that cranking up, or turning off areas of the brain have an effect on behavior.

  64. Not new science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has long been known that if you put two electromagnets either side of someone's balls, the more voltage you give them the more the subject leans towards telling you the truth.

  65. TMS is not just "magnets" by mick129 · · Score: 1

    It really bugs me when I see these articles describing TMS as "using magnets". These are intricately designed electromagnetic paddles which produce a field of a specific shape which induce a current. The paddles need to be correctly aimed at a particular brain region. In order to do the aiming, you'll need a MRI scan first. They make it sound like rubbing fridge magnets on your temples.

    --
    Move along, no sig to see here.
  66. Darn! by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 1

    So, will my tinfoil hat protect me from those things, or increase their power?!

  67. Super mario in two questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the other guard say you would lie to me?

    Truthful guard: Yes, he would.
    Big Liar guard: No, he wouldn't. (The truthful guard would say Yes, he would lie, so the liar guard will say the opposite.)
    Truthful guard: Is the princess behind this door?

    It'sa me, Mario!

    Bowser, eat your heart out.

  68. We are lying along because.. by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

    We are lying, but it is not our fault, It's EARTH's FAULT for pulling our damn moral compass! damn Earth!

  69. It's not modern neuroscience by S77IM · · Score: 1

    LYCEUM, Athens -- Researchers led by Aristotle have released a startling scroll detailing their findings on a beverage called "wine." Apparently, when consumed in sufficient quantities, wine can lead to loss of inhibition, poor judgement, and lascivious behavior. Combined with last year's discovery that head trauma can make a person "loopy," it appears that our cherished ideas about the soul and free will must be called into question.

    --
    Student: Is it true that the foundation of the universe is paradox?
    Master: Well, yes and no.
    1. Re:It's not modern neuroscience by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      LYCEUM, Athens -- Researchers led by Aristotle have released a startling scroll detailing their findings on a beverage called "wine." Apparently, when consumed in sufficient quantities, wine can lead to loss of inhibition, poor judgement, and lascivious behavior. Combined with last year's discovery that head trauma can make a person "loopy," it appears that our cherished ideas about the soul and free will must be called into question.

      I presume you're being sarcastic, but the fact that chemicals can influence moral judgment *should* have tipped people off that things with the mind, soul, morals, will, etc. aren't quite the way popular imagination would have them... let's see... about a day after the first batch of beer was brewed.

      (That's probably when the first hangover remedy was invented, too.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  70. Ignorance is unbecoming... by RedBear · · Score: 1

    Wow. I am rather disturbed by the amount of ignorance being displayed over this article simply because the word "magnet" was mentioned. These are not refrigerator magnets or Q-Ray bracelets we're talking about here. With TMS we're talking something like a one TESLA electromagnetic coil placed right next to your skull that goes snap-snap-snap every time it goes off, momentarily creating an intensely powerful magnetic field that can either stimulate or supress the electrical activity in the targeted part of the brain. The effects are mild and temporary, but very real.

    It's one thing to be skeptical of a product someone is trying to sell you, and quite another to ignorantly dismiss perfectly sound basic scientific research just because they used a word that has been misappropriated by snake oil salesmen.

    The idea that stimulating or supressing a certain part of the brain can induce behavior modification is not new either. Any sort of damage to the left temporal prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain right under your left temple) is strongly correlated with having dark, intensely homicidal and/or suicidal thoughts. Many doctors have noted immediate positive post-operation personality shifts in patients who have had large tumors or cysts removed that were pressing on this area of the brain. It should not be much of a stretch to imagine that other behaviors can be modified by manipulating other parts of the brain.

    I also find it bizarre that people keep commenting that they don't believe the brain can be "forced" to lie. I think a number of pathological liars who have had their lives ruined by having the constant overpowering urge to lie all the time would beg to differ.

    I think the main thing we are learning these days is that the human brain is both more complex than we ever imagined and, in some very disturbing ways, far LESS complex than we would like it to be. But if we freely embrace the new knowledge we are gaining we may be close to learning how to actually repair many of the "broken" human beings that we now just keep in cages because we don't know what else to do with them. Not lobotomize or brainwash, but actually repair, back to what the rest of us consider "normal". To me, what is going on in neuroscience these days is very exciting. Ripe for abuse, of course, but still exciting because of the positive possibilities.

  71. You only get to ask one question by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    You ask, "which door would the other guard tell me is the one with the tiger behind it?"

    That's the door you want to open to find the princess.

  72. Magnetic wig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean my (patent pending) magnetic wigs* are a bad idea?

    *Requires metal plated skull - not included.

  73. The problem is... by polymeris · · Score: 1

    The problem is, you can't know which side leads the subject to always tell the truth. Also, you are only allowed to make one question. Also, one of the 12 coins is either heavier or lighter than the others. And only two passengers fit in the boat at the same time.
    How do you know which path leads to heaven?

  74. Obligatory by sconeu · · Score: 0
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  75. Harry Mudd... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Kirk: Everything Harry Mudd says is a lie, do you hear me, everything he says is a LIE!

    Mudd: Now listen carefully... I'm lying.

    Norman: But... if everything you say is a lie, and you say you are lying then you are telling the truth, but you cannot be telling the truth because everything you say is a lie... Conflict! Conflict! Co-ordinate!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  76. Of course it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just keep hitting you with the magnets until you tell them what they want to hear,

  77. Pinnochio's nose by realsilly · · Score: 1

    That could make things interesting, don't ya think?

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  78. Not if you're a dualist by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Many people have the sense that they are not their brains. Intuitively, their brains are like their eyes, ferrying information from the world to the "real you" that peeps out through the eyes like windows.

    It's an insupportable notion, but one people hold very deal. There's a sense of self-ness that doesn't feel like it's just the reactions of zillions of neurons. And since neurologists can't yet explain the details, it's easy to treat your own perception of self-ness as more realistic than their handwaves.

    There is key philosophical differences between dualism and physicalism. In physicalism, when the brain dies, you die. In dualism, there is a transcendent part that can continue to survive. Science practically presumes physicalism, and scientific arguments against dualism can veer into begging the question. Evidence like this makes it increasingly clear that there isn't any cogency to dualism, but it's not trivial.

    There are a lot of moral implications as well. "Blame" is a less clear concept when the "I" isn't a rock-solid, immutable everlasting soul. Does guilt attenuate over time? What is the point of punishment? These are questions for which the intuitive dualism gives different answers from physicalism.

    So, when people talk about "killing the idea of free will", it's really the dualistic free will they're talking about. The idea doesn't go away lightly, especially when neurologists have only hints like this experiment. This is one more interesting pointer in defeating the intuitive, and probably wrong, approach.

  79. ...For a very loose definition of "force". by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone RTFA? This is /. so I guess not.


    "Results showed that the eight volunteers who had their left DPC stimulated lied more often, while the ones with the right DPC stimulated were more likely to tell the truth, researchers said."

    There is a hell of a big difference between "forces you to tell the truth" and "statistically more likely, within this experiment's margin of error to tell the truth".

  80. Mu-metal hats! by arielCo · · Score: 1

    It's all the rage now!

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  81. Apparrently AGW alarmists .... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    have mod points today

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  82. Everything I say is a lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....except that. ....and that.....and that.....and that.....and that.....and that.

  83. Re:Magnets force me to by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    The must also be making the summary lie, like usual.

    Even the article that repeats the claim that "Zapping the brain with magnets makes it IMPOSSIBLE to lie, claim scientists" in the headline also lies. The actual body, in both articles, says only that there was more of a tendency afterward, and that could be explained by poor controls - the people were asked to do the test twice, and there was a very small group size (16 people).

  84. Bogus Moral Compass! :| by angiasaa · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that a lie is fabricated from any sort of moral standpoint whatsoever. When I make up a lie, I do it for reasons all my own. Morality is a distant second to whatever primary reason I might have.
     
    For instance, I would not (if asked by a stranger on a bus) tell the truth about carrying a ton of money in my back pack. My primary motive has no moral inclination. It is driven by the perceived necessity for the safety of my belongings. Secondary would perhaps be perceived by some as a moral contradiction My parents might have said that it was evil to lie and that I would spend another agonizing eternity in hell. If such were the case, and if that were anything to do with morals, they're NOT MY morals, they're social morals.
     
    Even if a magnet is somehow able to seize up my moral faculties, I would still be free to tell the Truth, or to tell a Lie based on intellectually reasoned stimulation. No amount of mental stimulation will be able to so that.
     
    I admit however, that there is a possibility that one could be immersed into a state of "willingness to respond with the truth rather than the false", however, it would be more due to a mental state and a clever questioner than anything else. Ask the wrong questions and *blam!* your truth serum will fall apart. As long as the mind forgets that it is unsafe, irresponsible, unsuitable or whatever else, to tell a lie, it will not bother making up one. As soon as it realizes the situation, it will invariably fight off the influence and pull its inhibitions right back to where there are supposed to be.
     
    That noted, I find it impossible to imagine how someone could be influenced to tell a lie every time s/he opens his/her mouth. I just don't see that happening.

    --
    Geekism is your _only_ God!
  85. Where's the control group??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanted to make this a credible experiment, wouldn't you use more people and a CONTROL??? Out of 16 people, with two tests, what are the chances that there were two (or even four) less lies per candidate total?

  86. Head/Ear phones? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Strong enough to have an effect, depending on the audio you feed to them?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  87. Let me guess... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    A magnet on the right makes one tell the truth, but a magnet on the left makes one more sinister.

  88. Maybe not much political effect after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an old joke:

    What's the difference between a used car salesperson
    and a computer salesdroid? The used car salespeople
    know when they're lying.

    I'm pretty sure you could substitute a few other jobs for "computer salesdroid" with
    "politician" high on the list.

  89. Magnets force the truth out by nsushkin · · Score: 1

    I have a heavily magnetized hammer. Now tell me the truth.

  90. Day off? by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

    What happened to all the pseudo-skeptical "magnets have no effect on living tissue" hysteria? Seems it wasn't so long ago that people were being laughed out of this forum for claims like this. People should stick to their guns.

  91. Cell Phone Research Tie? by orkayak · · Score: 1

    Makes me wonder if any of this has been tied to previous, but highly variable, research on the effects of cell phones on the brain. Wow, could cell phones cause one to be truthful, depending on which ear is used. :-O

  92. They're conservative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hire illegal immigrants to work for them.