Yeah, and this is critical in the difference between 'leaked' and 'stolen'.
How did they actually get taken? Pissed celeb assistant, social engineering of each celeb, or actual hack of some photo storage system where they all were.
“Wood briefly took his eyes away from the road precisely when the narrow roadway curved slightly to the left without prior warning, causing him to inadvertently travel straight into the bike lane, immediately striking Olin,” the letter from the DA’s Office stated.
One small problem with that theory... if they "inconveniently lose" a critical bit of video evidence at trial, the defense would savage them for it, and the jury is likely to let that fact color their decision in a way that is not advantageous to the prosecution.
Innocent people can still go to jail. Or pay a lot of money to lawyers. Not exactly due process.
Slashdot Mirror
Interesting.
Direct source seems to confirm.
https://github.com/hackappcom/...
Spoiler:
A guy named Bryan Hamade from Georgia seems to have leaked them. Who stole them is still up for debate.
Yeah, and this is critical in the difference between 'leaked' and 'stolen'.
How did they actually get taken? Pissed celeb assistant, social engineering of each celeb, or actual hack of some photo storage system where they all were.
It's permanent as long as there's 350 billion tons of fresh water melting into the ocean there every year.
Back when Homo sapiens didn't exist.
The true line of bullshit.
“Wood briefly took his eyes away from the road precisely when the narrow roadway curved slightly to the left without prior warning, causing him to inadvertently travel straight into the bike lane, immediately striking Olin,” the letter from the DA’s Office stated.
LEOs are in a completely different boat when it comes to them being susceptible to certain laws
What the fuck are you talking about?
Is distracted driving illegal? Yes.
Is it illegal if you're a LEO? Yes.
Is vehicular homicide illegal? Yes.
Is it illegal if you're a LEO? Yes.
Are the laws different if you're a LEO? No.
Will you be *prosecuted* differently if you're a LEO? Yes.
Or bleeding on the officer.
How many riots over rich black dudes have there been?
Yeah, that's kind of the point of the whole discussion.
One small problem with that theory... if they "inconveniently lose" a critical bit of video evidence at trial, the defense would savage them for it, and the jury is likely to let that fact color their decision in a way that is not advantageous to the prosecution.
Innocent people can still go to jail. Or pay a lot of money to lawyers. Not exactly due process.
Where is the money going to come for all these cameras?
Sell a fucking tank that the federal gov't gave you, for free.
Guess what business will be cropping up in Reno soon?
Actually, it would make perfect sense.
Make it a dead mans switch.
Doesn't go off until police turn off phone service, which doesn't send 'don't blow up' message.
Make sure you're in good cell coverage first though...
That's the joke, son.
Seems most everyone disagrees with you.
I'll take bad over horrible every day, and twice on the second Tuesday in November.
Republicans are just a bit more blatant about it because it appeals to their idiot constituency.
I'm not sure voluntarily going on a plane is the government violating your right to privacy.
Fine.
What *grownups* play an FPS...
That was kind of my point.
blanket authority doesn't cover constitutional authority.
Old people always invest in dividends for cash flow.
He's not really any different than my parents, other than scale.
Haven't you heard that the next Tesla model will fold and only weigh 40 lbs, to solve problems exactly like this.
You may not call it invading. The US may not call it invading.
Russia, or especially North Korea, might.