Slashdot Mirror
Reported iCloud Hack Leaks Hundreds of Private Celebrity Photos
swinferno writes with news about the leak of hundreds of private celebrity photos over the weekend. Hundreds of revealing pictures of female celebrities were leaked overnight after being stolen from their private collections. Hunger Games actress Jennifer Lawrence, Kirsten Dunst, and pop star Ariana Grande were among the celebrities apparently shown in the pictures, which were posted on infamous web forum 4chan. It's unclear how the images were obtained, but anonymous 4chan users said that they were taken from celebrities' iCloud accounts. The accounts are designed to allow iPhone, iPad, and Mac users to synchronize images, settings, calendar information, and other data between devices, but the service has been criticized for being unreliable and confusing. Earlier this year, Jennifer Lawrence herself complained about the service in an interview with MTV.
Where are these photos you speak of?
I guess the internets are dead.
Is I seem to recall most re posted on a reddit /r/the fappening or somthing like that.. THose are still there as 4chans stuff is gone.
Queue up the apple fan boys and the endless excuses...
3.....2.....1.....
Actually the source was anonib.
But they were then posted all over 4chan yeah.
https://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10942405/09.01.2014_Celebrity_Nude_Photo_Hack_Collection_-__fappening
Pretty good detective work: http://pastebin.com/cwAz9Y2r
Then dont use it. Pretty simple. There is no law that says you have to use any cloud service, so if you dont trust/like them, dont use them. And dont bitch about it when you choose to do so.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
This is on the news everywhere and, obviously, is going to make Apple look very bad. I don't think I'll have long term consequences for Apple but at least it may make some people think twice about uploading personal information to "the cloud".
seriously, what am i missing?
Come on people, I should not have to remind you.
Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
Will this be the Pearl Harbor moment when people realize that Apple, Android, and The Cloud(TM) is a terrible idea?
Probably not. Instead people will likely say:
Oooh! Shiny!!! Iphone 6 coming out in a couple weeks!
Sad.
Here's a tip for all the celebs: don't take nude photos.
Slashdot: Where we care about privacy, unless there's a chance to see a naked girl Pro-tip: There are millions of photos of naked women out there that can be viewed wiithout violating anyone's privacy. Go make use of those if you're in so desperate need.
Are we sure it's iCloud? If we know for sure, I see some major news sites like CNN not even mentioning Apple in their stories about this... Fanboys.
Search for "fappening" on the pirate bay.
It's the one with about 20000 seeds.
there have been many pearl harbor level events, apple being nowhere near the worst offender. in fact one can easily argue that apple has done pretty well with respect to protecting user's privacy. and we don't strictly speaking know that this particular breach was caused by apple.
I worked for Apple for 9 years. I would never use iCloud for anything I needed to keep private.
Apple's own culture of secrecy works against them. You don't discuss what you are doing outside your immediate team. This means that you often don't know enough about what you are doing to understand where your code will be used. You are working from a design (or an API) specified by another team and you have to assume they have the complete picture. If they don't specify brute force protection for your code you must assume that they have a reason or they are using some other method.
The internal secrecy also results in multiple implementations of the same function, because each team knows its own code and doesn't see what others have already implemented or are working on. No doubt somebody in the organization thinks that the internal secrecy is worth the cost.
"My iCloud keeps telling me to back it up, and I'm like, I don't know how to back you up. Do it yourself."
OP really pulled a sensationalist trick with this one.
There's one important element of these leaks that I've never seen anyone comment on: it's all well and good to hack a weak password, but how do these people wind up getting their hands on lists of celebrities' private email addresses? It's not like you can just throw some terms at Google and come up with anything useful.
WTF? Idiot celebs. End of comment.
And Dropbox's feature that syncs your photos to it. I bet when the truth comes out, the Apple blamer's will have some egg on their face.
1. There's evidence of a Dropbox manual ending up in the photo mix.
2. Some of these celebrities claim they don't own iDevices but Android.
Ok, first of all, if I some how got hold of these pictures, I'd delete them. Integrity is good for us all. I've no animosity towards the famous.
That being said, these people sold their privacy for cold hard cash. Not small amounts either, enough to buy the town I live in. Maybe I'm a jerk, but I just don't feel all that bad for them. They sell sex every day, all day. I have a feeling most are more upset that some of the pictures are unflattering than they are that they're nude in them.
Somebody:
1) Takes nude photos of themselves with an internet-connected device.
2) Has said photos of themselves synchronized with an internet service
3) Is surprised / outraged that said photos are accessed by somebody on the internet.
I'm not saying that those people are to blame, but rather that there is a significant disconnect between technology and users' expectations. And the companies involved aren't making things any better with their hand-waving "cloud" mumbo-jumbo.
While true that Apple is by no means the worst at security, they are one of the most image concious companies in the world and if there is a celebrity backlash due to these leaks it could really harm them. Doesn't help their iPhone 6 launch in the next week or two either.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Looks like the favorite file format in the iCloud is Pirate just like the iPod; now add Porn.
What would Steve say to know that his iCloud is the worlds largest gay porn site.
Ha ha
doesnt help nor hurt. not going to register in any meaningful way. news cycle is 24 minutes. it will have been forgotten by the time next post goes up on /.
the knowledge that "noodies" are out there will linger for a few days for its intrinsic value..
These greedy celebrities take these nude photos and upload them to the Cloud or whatever in the hopes they get leaked, then sue said people for leaking them, viewing them, etc.
After all, there's a profit to he bad.
Some of these celebrities are supposedly android users, which calls into question the idea of an iCloud attack. What of the rumor that a honeypot wifi at the Emmy awards?
As far as I know, Jennifer Lawrence has never done a nude scene in a movie. Is some of the outrage due to that maybe Jennifer Lawrence as an actress is more appealing/alluring in some roles because she's not been seen on screen nude and thus manages to increase her allure by keeping the mystery alive (although X-Men and American Hustle did about everything possible to reveal that mystery)
It does seem to be something of a female celebrity career trope that when they hit a mature phase of their careers they start opting for roles that involve a lot of nudity under some kind of guise that it's a challenging or artistically complex thing to do. Usually the more explicit the nudity and/or sex the greater press it draws and with any luck a bump to the actress' career.
Could Jennifer Lawrence ALSO be motivated by the fact that being nude in a movie is some way passé now -- ie, taking a role with nudity would no longer bring any added celebrity or notoriety because we've already seen that?
I'm not implying she doesn't have other, better reasons to be annoyed -- celebrities are people too, and like their privacy. I'm just curious to what extent the outrage isn't somewhat motivated by a celebrity's desire to flog an image of sexuality for maximum return.
No. What it comes down to is who, and what, are trustworthy. Cloud services are not trustworthy. Some people are not trustworthy. This doesn't just apply to images; it applies to financial information (banks are not trustworthy), to your behavior in public (those other people at parties are not trustworthy) and so on.
There's no need to give up intimate entertainment. You just need to learn to be discrete, and this means very carefully evaluating who, and what, are trustworthy. I will grant that in the face of all the cloud propaganda, the social networking tsunami, the government's drive to list everyone and everything, and people's innate tendency to gossip, this may no longer be obvious, but discretion is, in fact, one of the key characteristics of a mature and healthy personality.
If you don't want something repeated, don't say it. If you don't want it shared, don't share it. But you can still do it. From there, the advisability of "doing it" becomes a question of one's morals and ethics -- and perhaps the law. While the law is often completely wrongheaded, we must always remember the amount of power in the system's hands.
Discretion: That's what is at the core of all of this. Not self-censorship.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
There is an easy fix if you dislike a service required by a device. Don't use those devices.... There are options.
sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
On Slashdot, where I thought people valued their privacy, we have about half of you asking for the pictures, a fourth of you posting links of them, and another fourth blaming these celebrities for taking PRIVATE nude photos of themselves (because apparently when your job is "actress", you're not allowed to have a personal life). Nobody thinks it's wrong that that this happened? Does nobody care what a huge violation of privacy these people just went through, or does that suddenly not matter anymore because boobs?
If I was one of these actresses I'd be crying in a corner right now. You would be too if this happened to you. Just imagine all of your interactions with literally any person, stranger or no. Nobody deserves this to happen to them, and you should be ashamed of yourselves for spreading this crap. I hope the guy that got these photos goes to jail.
No. There isn't. There's good use of cloud and bad use of cloud. If it's not a problem for random people, business entities, criminals and governments to have access to your data, then cloud storage can be convenient and harmless. Using cloud for storage of anything personal, proprietary, secret or dangerous is outright stupid. Marketing bullshit aside, you are putting your data in multiple-someone-else's hands and you have *zero* control over where it goes from there. There is no assurance of security whatsoever. There never has been. It is extremely unlikely there ever will be.
These truths extend to your own use of storage. Storing information on your boot drive can expose it to others if the machine ever needs repair and you cannot do the work yourself and you let the machine out the door with the boot drive and/or backup drives still installed. Connecting a machine with information on any attached storage device to the Internet creates a risk constructed of a very long list of possible errors whose genesis can be traced to the author(s) of your operating system and/or your own security procedures. Allowing others physical access to your machine can expose your data. Even the possibility of physical access to your machine, regardless of your authorization, can do so.
Most people don't understand security, and have not learned to be discrete, and are very poor evaluators of who, and what, are actually trustworthy. Unfortunately, this creates a situation where the gullible fall into the trap set by marketers claiming things like cloud storage are "safe." We can't fix this without specific education on the matter, and with a school system that can't even graduate people who can read and write well, the required understanding of secure data handling will almost certainly remain in the realm of the sophisticated technical person. And the clouds will continue to precipitate data the owners wanted to remain undistributed to many places it wasn't expected to go.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
Well, jlaw's has a well crafted and defined public image (that image includes the belief that the image might actually be genuine). This public image includes an idea that she is somehow more 'normal' than a 'normal actress', and therefore would have similar squeamishness towards a nude role as the 'girl next door' you know when she was growing up.
So one of two things are happening:
- She is generally offended by this, and is reacting accordingly.
- Her public image dictates that she appear to be offended by this, and is acting accordingly.
I think you're being far too cynical. These are photos that were not intended to be released to the public. These show people's private lives. Just imagine that it happened to you, not only are your naked photos on the internet, but a significant portion of the world has seen them, and they recognize your name and face. What if 5% of all people you meet, stranger or no, have seen those private pictures not meant for the public, and, more importantly, recognize you and know that they're yours? Nobody wants this to happen, and the reason is absolutely not because the "mystery has been revealed".
> If you cannot even trust the platform, then how does your logic work?
The logic works fine. Platforms can work fine too. Society, however, doesn't. So that part is up to you.
> Can't trust cell phone cameras. By definition it's a camera attached to a communications device. It's designed to share that photo.
Exactly right. Buy a DSLR if you require discretion in photography. Ensure it does not have network connectivity (some do... Canon 6D, for instance.) If you take an image with a cellphone camera, be aware before you ever shoot it that you can have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever. It goes further than that, too. When using a smartphone, again be aware you have no reasonable expectation of privacy whatsoever with regard to texts, voice conversations, video conversations, email, your location, billing, logging and so one for every service the phone provides you (or others) with.
> Can't trust storing it on a PC as PCs are connected to the Internet in the overwhelming majority of instances.
No. If you want to store something that requires discretion, then you require a non-network connected PC. There's no inherent need to connect a PC to a network. Just because you can, doesn't mean you have to. Nor is there a need to construct a PC with bluetooth, wifi and so on. Nor is there a need to leave a PC in a generally accessible location and/or condition. These are all user choices. Make them wrongly, and your security is compromised. But they are not inevitabilities. There's a lesson here: just because others do something in some particular manner does not mean that you have to do so.
> Then there's the whole point of a picture, looking it at it. Typically that means more than just the picture-taker looking at it
Again, no. This is also user choice. You are responsible for the consequences of your choices, and for knowing the things you need to know to make those choices well. The key here is to be informed enough to make the most correct choices. "It's typical" is not a metric that binds anyone in any way. If you embrace such a thing, you either choose to do so or you are so ignorant that you know no better, in which case anyone who trusts you with data that requires discretion is making a serious mistake.
The images I have taken or otherwise created that I have *decided* you may see are here. The ones I have *decided* you may not have access to, you will never, ever see, barring use of military levels of force. These conditions were quite literally trivial to instantiate and maintain. Think, choose, easy implementation, all done.
> For all we know, none of these women's accounts were compromised. Their boyfriends, husbands, ex-boyfriends, ex-husbands, girlfriends, ex-girlfriends accounts could have been, or those people could have shared the photos with others, and their accounts were compromised.
The issue isn't account centric. It is behavior centric. You must identify data that needs protection; you must identify the trustworthy in regard to both persons and systems; you must control distribution; you must employ discretion and ensure that your knowledge is up to the task of seeing all these things through. If you cannot do these things, you are (at the very least) a potential victim of your own limitations. And you should probably fix that. :)
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
Could Jennifer Lawrence ALSO be motivated by the fact that being nude in a movie is some way passe now...?
perhaps not as much as you think.
It seems every other day there's a "celebrity wardrobe malfunction" story or similar posted somewhere. The difference here is that JLaw and Upton are on top of show business right now, not trying to manufacture some tawdry publicity.
The other irony is that Tim Cook wouldn't be titillated by the photos, if rumors are correct...
All three links are to exe files not images or zips.
That iCloud gets "hacked" right before the launch event next week. On another note they also said they have videos witch are not automatically uploaded to iCloud like photo stream, I find it hard to believe anyone would purposely want porn of themselves on every apple device they own lol just a few thoughts ;)
I imagine many of them want to be seen as serious actresses and realize that doing excessive, unwarranted nudity early in their careers would sabotage that. Maybe later when they are established they can feel more relaxed about it, but when young doing topless/nude screens is pretty much the mark of a talentless only-there-for-her-looks b-list star. There are exceptions of course, but they are just that - exceptions.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Her words at an awards show where she commented that if she showed a tit she'd break the Internet, then reached up for her decolletage, throws a bit of a wrench in that analysis. The venue was far too public for her to let her guard down, and it flies in the face of a carefully cultivated image of higher standards in a vein like that of Taylor Swift.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
I hope this teaches people not to trust their privacy with online service these days. It is just non-existent.
The whole functioning mechanism here is a question of supply and demand with heavily restricting supply and creating profit.
Every human lately devoid of fur is essentially naked, so there is an immense supply of nakedness.
Now, to create this market, supply is restricted, in many countries by law and heavily penalized, often with death penalty.
With those restrictions the market value of relatively few individuals showing few and then suddenly more of their skin create sensation and revenue.
In essence, who should care at all since once the restricted masses will recognize all this is just an illusion because everyone has it, this market will collapse.
So, be careful not to invest in any of this scam.
... to promote the iFap; the wearable device to be announced 9/9. Kidding aside, coincidence so close to an Apple event?
Perl Programmer for hire
Did the brute-force attack sidestep Apple ID two-step verification? I'm guessing no, and that none of the celebs who were hacked had bothered to enable the two-step login shuffle. You might think a celebrity could afford to hire someone to beef up their online security and advise them in such matters. Why don't they?
"Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens." - Schiller
It could have just as easily been a packet sniffing engine on a local ISP, cellular network, data center etc. Maybe in front of Amazon? Were these all transferred through snapchat, dropbox or some other file sharing service that leverages AWS or some other cloud provider? Were any taken from those services by admins?
My point is, many of these images were *taken* with non-apple devices and *deleted* before photo stream was a thing. At this point it is likely someone got access to a darknet cache of images -- the sources are unlikely from one location, but from many many sources over many years.
LTDR; 1. Enable 2FA 2. If you upload something to the internet, assume someday someone will be able to see it and do whatever they want with it. Are you okay with that?
Looking at the EXIF data attached to the photographs, where it's available, and the structure of the filenames I can see that only some of them came from iPhones/iCloud. I can also see photographs from Android phones (Nexus 7 and Samsung Galaxy 5s) likely acquired via Google Drive, other photographs clearly taken from Dropbox accounts (the dumps include default dropbox files), and many clearly taken from Twitter and Facebook private messages (filenames are a dead giveaway).
Some of the filenames look like those you would get from a recovery or backup programme rather than an auto generated one, which chimes with what victims have said on Twitter regarding deleting the images months or even years ago.
In any case there are clearly multiple sources and as usual Apple Derangement Syndrome is in full swing.
Likely as not this was related to the heartbleed bug. Large amounts of passwords were acquired around that time, and were probably being used on multiple services. It's equally possible that this wasn't a breach at Apple et al but a breach of Amazon Web Services or Microsoft's Azure as those services are used to backup data from iCloud, Google Drive, and many others.
What's worse for some of the celebs is that the pictures contain GPS data that could compromise their homes.
...how some speculation posted on the internet has to be true. So far there is zero evidence it has anything to do with iCloud or even Apple, just speculation. The brute password hack was real but there is no evidentiary connection so far. Unless 100% of the celebrities were using iPhones and iCloud to store their photos it's just as likely there was some other kind of hack such as some place they all were at (people pointed to the Emmys as one possibility). But the internet is all about pumping up the noise. It might be iCloud, or it might not be, we don't have any proof yet. It could be someone at the NSA had too much booze one day.
This might do more to raise concerns about privacy and security than all the news coverage of the Snowden leaks. That's the sorry state of our world today.
Are they exceptions? Kate Winslet, Ann Hathaway and Marion Cotillard have all done extensive nudity yet remain highly regarded actresses. You could just as easily say that good acting is an exception and nudity is just a superfluous criteeia.
I think a lot of it is complicated by the twisted American view of nudity. It's often only put in for scandal and titillation and seldom used in a realistic manner. A lot of people talk about "unnecessary" which I think is begs the question as to what "necessary" nudity is.
It does seem to be something of a female celebrity career trope that when they hit a mature phase of their careers they start opting for roles that involve a lot of nudity under some kind of guise that it's a challenging or artistically complex thing to do
Nah, that's what they get offered. Most of them would probably prefer to keep their clothes on for a number of reasons but if that's the only work they can get, then most of them will take it.
One thing about nudity is that it takes the film out of the "made for TV" realm. That's probably one reason directors do it.
If you don't want something to leak on the Internet in the 21st century, DON'T DO IT!
Perhaps the NSA could have learned that lesson with Edward Snowden...
These really are just nude pictures, some with sex. But are we all shocked that are celebrities look hot when they're naked?
Far worse would have been for photos to leak showing criminal activity, such as torturing dogs, doing drugs, or acting like complete assholes by beating up and torturing people.
There's a few long bows being drawn here.
1. If we assume that iCloud has been hacked, either systematically, or en-masse, then there's a lot more data to be grabbed, then just nude photographs. Epicly more: Emails, appointments, holiday plans, Tinder logs etc At this stage, none of that has come out publicly. I'd have thought the list of Tinder users JLaw had swiped right for would be equally as salacious as a the photographs, or that the iMessage backups of some celebrities would probably contain high value salacious gossip & sexting.None of this kind of data has surfaced as yet (it may in the future).
2. The EXIF data on a substantial number of the photographs indicates a reasonably high percentage, maybe 40%, use of non-iOS devices. Yes its technically possibly to move photographs taken from other devices into iCloud via a Mac, but its a bit of a stretch that such a high percentage of users would also ALL be using iCloud.
3. Some of the photography appears to have come from years old photographs, that pre-date iCloud, some of the photos are doctored, and some of the people involved have denied ever using iCloud.
So, from that its pretty safe to conclude that the photographs are actually coming from multiple sources, dispersed over a period of years. As an iCloud hack can't be the source of a large fraction of the photos, its open to speculation/debate as to how large this fraction actually is. IF that fraction is roughly of a size where good old social engineering, password re-use, and trivial passwords could explain it, AND no other non-photo salacious data comes up, you'd have to conclude that the "mass iCloud hack" hypothesis is on shaky ground (even though SOME of the pictures may have indeed come from iCloud).
Essentially the iCloud hack hypothesis comes from someone a) claiming it, and b) a recent brute force attack tool that is now neutered, being posted to GitHub. Thats pretty thin in terms of supporting evidence.
An alternate hypothesis, is that its actually a leak of a closed community darknet celeb picture sharing forum, where someone has broken that circle of trust. It does involve 4Chan after all.
I remember reading a book by Arthur C Clarke (I think it's something called Light of Other Days), where surveillance has become so pervasive because the technology to do so has become penny cheap everybody assumes everybody will be spied on. When that point is reached, then you'll have to take it for granted that somebody somewhere has a revealing photo of you. Does the shower head have an embedded nano-camera? What about that coffee mug?
So maybe when that time come people will just try to look their best everywhere whether it's in the crapper, bed or kitchen. In bed people will simply avoid embarassing/humiliating positions unless they want to be known as the hideous kinky type.
Worse than having a leaked photo of your naked self is having a leaked photo of your warts, love handles and other ugly spots. If you're built like a body builder or a supermodel, your nude photo can well become part of your professional resume. Who knows, maybe some celebs are deliberately careless about their nude photos because subconsciously they want the whole world to see how beautiful they are even when they're not wearing designer clothes?
this is the second time apple has been involved in a celebrity sex photo/video leak.
in 2008 Edison Chen (popular Hong Kong actor/singer) took his idevice to an apple store for service, his dozens of videos and photos of sex with a dozen famous HK starlets were on the internet, slowly leaked like these appear to be.
there was huge backlash, he ended up "retiring" from acting, but has since returned.
Brute force attack. Possibly re-used passwords. Use fully random 32 character passwords for your cloud stuff. And don't put nude selfies on the internet. Regardless of service.
And let's face it, it's only boobs.
There's often much more.
But only a handful of photos are quite worth to protect from prying eyes.
Most are only a display of ordinary intimacy, over time celebs will overcome this.
So we can look forward to Judy Dench doing some excessive nudity now that she's firmly established?
You are fired Internet!!.
Anyone who uses an Apple product or "Cloud"/"Smart" product, is a tool and an idiot, and deserves to get hit by a bus, at the least. :)
I'm not implying she doesn't have other, better reasons to be annoyed -- celebrities are people too, and like their privacy. I'm just curious to what extent the outrage isn't somewhat motivated by a celebrity's desire to flog an image of sexuality for maximum return.
Bullshit. That's exactly what you're doing. Because of course the biggest reason someone would be annoyed by privacy violations is a loss of potential income.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
...but seeing as how this is related.
Obviously there are things that you should probably just keep offline. On the other hand, it can become very useful to have files up-to-date, synced, and backed up somewhere (most conveniently - the cloud). Especially nudies.
I'd like to ask the slashdot community some advice regarding the topic at hand. I've been concerned about the security of iCloud for quite some time and naively (out of pure convenience) began storing some sensitive data in the cloud. Obviously the first step would be to encrypt the txt/file on my end before uploading it to the cloud... is there any recommended programs that might streamline this? I've found two options, one that works with dropbox, and another that works with iCloud. But neither are quite what I am looking for.
Janus Notes 2 and BlueNote are both available for mac users... Janus is nice because it syncs with iCloud automatically, but it doesn't prompt you for a passkey when you use it... you simply set it and forget it. At lease janus is open source!
Who are we dealing with here? Pretty young actresses have a shelf life like ripe peaches and an army of agents, publicists and ego-strokers whose number one mission in life is to make sure they wring maximum monetization out of their celebrity looks.
I'll Jennifer Lawrence some credit, she's a great actress, but don't think for a moment that this entire celebrity enterprise isn't about turning looks into money. It sure as hell isn't about "art" or their credibility as artists.
What seems to be missing from any of this photo hacking "scandal" is any kind of questions about what kind of narcissism it takes to start taking your own nude selfies. Are we supposed to just believe this is some kind of creative personal expression, like every normal wife/mother/sister we know strips down and does nude selfies? Or is it more likely this is just a byproduct of the inevitable self-absorbption that comes from a cynical and tireless self-promotion?
And, really, I don't care -- the morality doesn't bother me a bit, but I'm not going to think for a minute there's not more than a little neurotic behavior. And given the long history of leaked video *tape*, how fucking stupid do you have to be as an A-list celebrity to think "Oh, I can take snaps of my tits on my phone and upload them to the cloud and nobody will ever see them."
If you search for "Jennifer Lawrence nude" on Google, you get quite a few pictures back (fake I'm sure). So why didn't Jennifer just say "Those are fakes" and be done with it? It's getting more attention than it should simply by her stating that those pictures were real and stolen... Had she simply stated they were fake, this would have been a non-issue.
The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
> "if you don't want pictures of your tits online, don't let anyone take pictures of your tits", implies that these actions are both immoral and stupid.
I don't know where you're coming up with this moral thing. Unless you define "immoral" to basically the same thing as "stupid", which would actually be fairly accurate but few people realize that these days. If you're a Hollywood starlet and you send out pictures of your boobs, someone is likely to show their buddy. That buddy sends it to his buddies and pretty soon your tits are all over the internet. "If you do this, it will likely result in that" isn't a statement of morality as commonly understood at this point in time.
Of course, if one actually reads a book of "morality" you'll find it says "don't fuck your neighbor's wife because that could get you killed. A prostitute is cheap, screwing your neighbor's wife could cost you your life." Today, though, we like to pretend that morality is either a) because God said so or b) a very abstract philosophical concept. Really, most of the great teaching is about how not to end up dead, how to have a happy life. In other words, how to not be stupid.
all of them here getcelebpicnow.com
Seeing her nude goes a ways to explaining why she isn't comfortable taking her clothes off on screen.
Losing 10-15 pounds would do wonders for her.
Doesn't stop the film from getting on TV. All it takes is a little editing.
photos here - http://allfux.com or http://assbox.wordpress.com you're welcome