If you don't understand what difference it could possibly make to wrongly identify a specific individual as the perpetrator of a terrorist attack, I'm not sure that there is any hope for you.
I'd argue that telling people to stay indoors when there's a man armed with a gun and bombs running around the neighbourhood is actually quite rational. It's not like we're talking about security theatre's hypothetical, invisible attacker, here.
That was in response to "Why don't you complain about the news reporters that "were hoping the perpetrators were white"?" The point is that special criticism must be placed upon the Post's actions.
Which of course is the first Google result for "study gender cv name". The remainder of the results will point you to several modern replications. Enjoy.
As in, if you give the same selection of CVs to two different hiring panels, the only difference between the two sets of CVs lies in the names, the CVs from ostensibly female applicants are consistently rated lower. This is research that has been repeated over and over.
It's only escalated from site security staff to Navy Seals? I would've thought Infowars would have a comprehensive thesis for them being Imperial Stormtroopers wearing illuminati sigils by now. I'm disappointed.
And if we lived in a universe where there wasn't an empirically demonstrated bias against women and ethnic minorities (having the same level of suitability) in hiring decisions across almost all fields, you'd have a point. Unfortunately the problem is very real and very well documented, and it's preventing us from hiring optimally, much less fairly.
Affirmative action supposes that the first step to eliminating that bias is to ensure that the individuals making these decisions are representative of the population as a whole.
They stopped making the Dreamcast in 2001. If you assume that the console was still "alive" at that point - which is pretty goddamn generous - that means that it was out of the race far too early to enjoy widespread broadband adoption.
Secondary terrorism is terrorism which is secondary to the original action, counter terrorism is an action which acts contrary to (counter to) terrorism?
Were you under the impression that the adjective "counter" meant something else?
Given that it's a social network, its interrelationships (or lack thereof) with existing social networks were an issue. Now, as someone who doesn't use social networks, you can argue that it doesn't apply to you, but you can hardly say that it's a positive, any more than creating inedible cheese is a perk for the lactose intolerant.
That would explain his popularity with the general public but it hardly accounts for the huge esteem with which his work is held in cosmology. You can bullshit your fans but you can't bullshit your colleagues.
Yes. It's early hardware being given out to developers, it's normal that people aren't allowed to (say) loan their company's PS4 out to their mate's stag do. At least not if they like having kneecaps.
Leap Motion works a lot like Kinect, but scaled down. It works over a smaller volume, so it can track smaller objects more accurately. On the downside, your hands have to be inside that small volume.
Maybe I have a later edition (or I'm thinking of a different book) but I recall him writing about Kip Thorne's wife's reaction to the payment of the bet.
It's assumed that it's going to be a supplimentary input device, and not the main one. There are times I wish I had a more intuitive way of rotating 3D objects, for example.
I recall that at least one of his bets was an insurance policy against the possibility that his favourite theory was false. If it was disproven, at least he'd have the consolation of (IIRC) a year's supply of Playboy magazine.
It's not a circular argument, inasmuch as the fields that fluctuate to allow a big bang to happen are not the fields that exist after the bang. They've moved the issue back one stage further in time, and in doing so created an intellectual space in which one might begin to address the validity of various models.
Slashdot Mirror
What an odd thing to conclude. Once can believe in asteroid impacts, yet not believe that Nibiru is about to cause a planetary catastrophe.
If you don't understand what difference it could possibly make to wrongly identify a specific individual as the perpetrator of a terrorist attack, I'm not sure that there is any hope for you.
I'd argue that telling people to stay indoors when there's a man armed with a gun and bombs running around the neighbourhood is actually quite rational. It's not like we're talking about security theatre's hypothetical, invisible attacker, here.
That was in response to "Why don't you complain about the news reporters that "were hoping the perpetrators were white"?" The point is that special criticism must be placed upon the Post's actions.
I shouldn't have to dig up an uncontroversial result from a decade and a half ago, but the classic study would be:
http://advance.cornell.edu/documents/ImpactofGender.pdf
Which of course is the first Google result for "study gender cv name". The remainder of the results will point you to several modern replications. Enjoy.
It's not necessary to "make fun of" false flag conspiracy theories, they're riotously amusing in and of themselves.
I'm sorry, your argument is that because the discrimination occurs at all social levels, that means it's okay?
As in, if you give the same selection of CVs to two different hiring panels, the only difference between the two sets of CVs lies in the names, the CVs from ostensibly female applicants are consistently rated lower. This is research that has been repeated over and over.
Martians! Ha! Everyone knows that the martians were wiped out and replaced by lizard simulants from Draco.
None of those news reports were front-page stories on a physically distributed newspaper identifying specific, vulnerable individuals, you ass.
It's only escalated from site security staff to Navy Seals? I would've thought Infowars would have a comprehensive thesis for them being Imperial Stormtroopers wearing illuminati sigils by now. I'm disappointed.
And if we lived in a universe where there wasn't an empirically demonstrated bias against women and ethnic minorities (having the same level of suitability) in hiring decisions across almost all fields, you'd have a point. Unfortunately the problem is very real and very well documented, and it's preventing us from hiring optimally, much less fairly.
Affirmative action supposes that the first step to eliminating that bias is to ensure that the individuals making these decisions are representative of the population as a whole.
They stopped making the Dreamcast in 2001. If you assume that the console was still "alive" at that point - which is pretty goddamn generous - that means that it was out of the race far too early to enjoy widespread broadband adoption.
Secondary terrorism is terrorism which is secondary to the original action, counter terrorism is an action which acts contrary to (counter to) terrorism?
Were you under the impression that the adjective "counter" meant something else?
"two cheap 2K projectors for 4K material" is actually the spec for doing IMAX Digital. Thanks, IMAX.
Given that it's a social network, its interrelationships (or lack thereof) with existing social networks were an issue. Now, as someone who doesn't use social networks, you can argue that it doesn't apply to you, but you can hardly say that it's a positive, any more than creating inedible cheese is a perk for the lactose intolerant.
That would explain his popularity with the general public but it hardly accounts for the huge esteem with which his work is held in cosmology. You can bullshit your fans but you can't bullshit your colleagues.
Isn't that about the length of a normal pop song anyway?
It's in the developer guidelines if you'd take five minutes to look at them.
Yes. It's early hardware being given out to developers, it's normal that people aren't allowed to (say) loan their company's PS4 out to their mate's stag do. At least not if they like having kneecaps.
Leap Motion works a lot like Kinect, but scaled down. It works over a smaller volume, so it can track smaller objects more accurately. On the downside, your hands have to be inside that small volume.
Maybe I have a later edition (or I'm thinking of a different book) but I recall him writing about Kip Thorne's wife's reaction to the payment of the bet.
It's assumed that it's going to be a supplimentary input device, and not the main one. There are times I wish I had a more intuitive way of rotating 3D objects, for example.
I recall that at least one of his bets was an insurance policy against the possibility that his favourite theory was false. If it was disproven, at least he'd have the consolation of (IIRC) a year's supply of Playboy magazine.
It's not a circular argument, inasmuch as the fields that fluctuate to allow a big bang to happen are not the fields that exist after the bang. They've moved the issue back one stage further in time, and in doing so created an intellectual space in which one might begin to address the validity of various models.