It is not difficult to imagine what the US would do, if the following act is used as an example:
American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002'
...
SEC. 2008. AUTHORITY TO FREE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS DETAINED OR IMPRISONED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
...
The President is authorized to use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any person described in subsection (b) who is being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court
By cutting a small hole in de envelope of a Single Sided (SS) disk you would turn it into a Double Sided disk effectively doubling it capacity. Of course these disk were SS for a reason, they had failed the double sided test.
I would not be surprised if these increases in HD space are due to use of disabled/unsafe disk surface
To prevent SPAM but allow Distribution List ....
on
Gates on Spam
·
· Score: 1
maybe a scheme where an accepted email entitles the sender to send more. This could be done maybe through sending back a single or limited use token (encrypted string).
So your email progam collect tokens from people you have send an email and attach it to new emails to the same address.
Your email program filters out email with and without a token. The tokens are then checked and marked as valid or invalid.
SPAM would get no token as you would never accept an email from those sourses.
Tokens could be
- single use
- multiple use
- with end date
etc
The difference between rotating around a point and moving along a line is just relevant for the kind of transformation you need to apply to the pictures to line them up.
When moving over a piece of paper you also need to take into account scaling (to compensate for the distance to the object) and tilting (when the camera is not kept at the same angle).
The more degrees of freedom you have with the camera to more computing power is needed to fix it.
Scanning a single piece of paper into a single image is just one application.
This is just a very CPU and Memory intensive task. More memory means pictures can overlap more, more CPU means more camera jitter can be compensated and the end result is a higher quality picture
It only mentions paper as the object to take a picture of, but it might also work for objects further away. This could solve the problem of the often very narrow angle lenses those tiny cameras have. Stitching multiple images automatically is nothing new but is CPU intensive. So Moore's law will take care of that.
they used to have a feature 'Ask the Expert'
See here http://www.websearchguide.ca/netblog/archives/0011 04.html
But doesn't seem to be available anymore
Slashdot Mirror
It would be nice if the results of Google could be filtered using your browser history.
This way you would have your own like WWW to search in and would only return sites you have visted in the past.
Page 87 of 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States
/. shouting]
[De-uppercased the title to avoid
a.k.a 'The Hague Invasion Act'
Not exactly 20 years ago (16 actually), but the Z88 was a Z80 (definitly older than 16 years) based portably that ran for 20 hours on 4 AA batteries.
Interestingly the fine is in . I am wondering if postponing paying up will make the amount in $ higher
NetRexx is just your normal Rexx, but it compiles into Java byte code:
Maybe it is time then to start MP3'ing the many Music DVDs that have 5.1 surround sound
I suppose you mend seconds not minutes. Even then a 10 second delay is unusable for cell phones
By cutting a small hole in de envelope of a Single Sided (SS) disk you would turn it into a Double Sided disk effectively doubling it capacity. Of course these disk were SS for a reason, they had failed the double sided test.
I would not be surprised if these increases in HD space are due to use of disabled/unsafe disk surface
Vision of Playstation 5
I cannot imagine there is no .gov domain with these directories indexed
isn't the way to go.
This would indeed force admins/designers to think about what data is really private. Which is not a bad idea
Wouldn't a '24 inch square panel' be a 24"x24" panel? 24"x24" = 4 sq.ft --> 20W/sq.ft.
but 75000 lumens would seem to be a bit overdoing it for a 8'x8' room.
The fact that you don't need a backlight anymore makes it not only more energy efficient, but also a lot thinner.
They are already used in some mobile phones.
10 pages, but only 2 Mb in total size.
A sparse but informative site.
maybe a scheme where an accepted email entitles the sender to send more. This could be done maybe through sending back a single or limited use token (encrypted string).
So your email progam collect tokens from people you have send an email and attach it to new emails to the same address.
Your email program filters out email with and without a token. The tokens are then checked and marked as valid or invalid. SPAM would get no token as you would never accept an email from those sourses. Tokens could be
- single use
- multiple use
- with end date
etc
It works like a kind of private stamps
they all use this Blog Drone. That's why it all looks the same.
Monitoring a single number is much easier.
Why don't they put a calling card on the market that allows to place very cheap calls to a specific country (let's say Pakistan).
That way it is easy to track even the use of every public phone booth.
The noise it makes now makes it quite useless to sneak around. What is the part that makes the noise?
Maybe check if they have read The Psychology of Computer Programming. It has a great section on 'ego-less' programming.
The difference between rotating around a point and moving along a line is just relevant for the kind of transformation you need to apply to the pictures to line them up.
When moving over a piece of paper you also need to take into account scaling (to compensate for the distance to the object) and tilting (when the camera is not kept at the same angle).
The more degrees of freedom you have with the camera to more computing power is needed to fix it.
Scanning a single piece of paper into a single image is just one application. This is just a very CPU and Memory intensive task. More memory means pictures can overlap more, more CPU means more camera jitter can be compensated and the end result is a higher quality picture
It only mentions paper as the object to take a picture of, but it might also work for objects further away. This could solve the problem of the often very narrow angle lenses those tiny cameras have.
Stitching multiple images automatically is nothing new but is CPU intensive. So Moore's law will take care of that.
they used to have a feature 'Ask the Expert' See here http://www.websearchguide.ca/netblog/archives/0011 04.html
But doesn't seem to be available anymore
Wouldn't self modifying code be in conflict with the advanced pipleines and program caches of present days CPUs? Looks to me like asking for trouble