That is the way NASA works, ost of the money is spent on admninstration and other things only vaguely related to space and spaceresearch, thus they do not have money to maintain and build actual things.. but then.. NASA sees to be like most goverment agencies, mainly a jobs program and a way to divide contracts to the districts of congressmen. Too bad they lost their way somewhere....
All these instant messagers and voice applications could somehow communicate so would not need to have so many on my computer. Even if the communication was on lowest common denominator, could use the ones I like and atleast communicate somehow with people using others.. oh well.. not likely to happen soon I guess.
Conceivably, the lab's services could help launch another revolutionary company...
Most "revolutionary" companies have been launched by going against "common wisdom" and doing thigs different ways than everyone else. Thus getting "help" early on from big companies.. well.. you draw the conclusions..
Like making a site with the $.05/word.. and few others.. the total cost and time to do that should be quit low as said in the artickle. anyone using adwords to generate sales should definitely try to find the best results by doing those types of doubleblind tests.
No it is not. It counters the effects of force of gravity with opposite force, as do many other effects like aerodynamic lift and so on.. but no.. they do not change gravity at all.
No TV is not over.. it is over for many people.. like I have not even owned a TV in 8 years.. But large ammounts of people watch TV daily is going to be there for a long time atleast...
A raising number of all types of Networking gear is fully ipv6 ready without anything special. I was actually surprised a bit at buying a very low end home router/gateway and finding it to have full ipv6 configration options. Thus in few years the big cost will be the actual configuration of things, not the hardware or software.
That is mostly because those people planning the infrastucture there are not all bound by quarterly results and can at times spend a bit extra now to avoid spending a lot later.
No, but you see scores of people who actually know things question all those sources given above. Any ninformation source by it's nature is fallible, because humans are involved. Unfortunately there is a creed of people (called journalists) that thing that journalists can never be really wrong in fact unless something is against their political beliefs.
Indeed, some people seem confused and think that wikipedia is an encyclopedia: "reference work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or that treats a particular branch of knowledge in a comprehensive manner.".
The Register has its own provocative style on debates. I do not think that they "need to grow up". Their opinnion articles are (allmost) allways thought provoking, but being opinnion pieces they are ofcourse consisting of opinnions. Are they allways right? ofcourse not.. but even then they usually make good points.
"All the time" is kind of over statement, but yes it does happen.. and will continue to happen every now and then, that is the way the thing works, anyone can add something.
But the thing this time was a bit different as the page in question was not linked from anywhere else, thus it was not spotted and fixed by anyone else until the stink arose.
Speech of many types has consequences.. everything from inciting to crime to slandering someone can have criminal or civil penalties however you do it.. be it on the street or the net.
Basically space flight will allways be more dangerous than air travel because the total energies used are so much higher.
That being said, air travel has become very safe during these 100 years of development, I expect spacetravel will also get more and more safe with time.
Also it will be more safe in the begining than air travel was, as we value human lives and the safely more as society now than we did back when air travel was young.
It is fairly easy.. whenever you find a world that does not mean anything to you, make a permamnet rule to delete that word. That way you wll build up the dictionary of words to ignore in marketspeak.
Agfter you have gone through the document in that manner, remove any sentences that do not make sense after the word removal, this is the time consuming part and cannot really be automated excep for sentences like "or and." or such.
After that you are normally left with 0-5 sentences that actually had some content, the number does not seem to depend on the length of the orginal text.
That is the "buzzword complience" thing one needs.. but any proper CIO knows that almost all BI products are total crap. Thus there is definitely a trend of "oh your product also does BI?, bye" raising. What is needed is actually GOOD products as the current wave is largely "hype-ware", though there are actually some fairly good(if very complex) products.
Slashdot Mirror
That is the way NASA works, ost of the money is spent on admninstration and other things only vaguely related to space and spaceresearch, thus they do not have money to maintain and build actual things.. but then.. NASA sees to be like most goverment agencies, mainly a jobs program and a way to divide contracts to the districts of congressmen. Too bad they lost their way somewhere....
All these instant messagers and voice applications could somehow communicate so would not need to have so many on my computer. Even if the communication was on lowest common denominator, could use the ones I like and atleast communicate somehow with people using others.. oh well.. not likely to happen soon I guess.
One should allways be cynical atleast.. and examine the thing and reasons critically.. but if the thing is good accept with thanks.
Most "revolutionary" companies have been launched by going against "common wisdom" and doing thigs different ways than everyone else. Thus getting "help" early on from big companies.. well.. you draw the conclusions..
Like making a site with the $ .05/word.. and few others.. the total cost and time to do that should be quit low as said in the artickle. anyone using adwords to generate sales should definitely try to find the best results by doing those types of doubleblind tests.
No it is not. It counters the effects of force of gravity with opposite force, as do many other effects like aerodynamic lift and so on.. but no.. they do not change gravity at all.
not to mention the fact that a TV show would not be first one to have them for real.. :)
No TV is not over.. it is over for many people.. like I have not even owned a TV in 8 years.. But large ammounts of people watch TV daily is going to be there for a long time atleast...
A raising number of all types of Networking gear is fully ipv6 ready without anything special. I was actually surprised a bit at buying a very low end home router/gateway and finding it to have full ipv6 configration options. Thus in few years the big cost will be the actual configuration of things, not the hardware or software.
depends on: can they continue programming the electronic voting machines to give the results they want?
That is mostly because those people planning the infrastucture there are not all bound by quarterly results and can at times spend a bit extra now to avoid spending a lot later.
No, but you see scores of people who actually know things question all those sources given above. Any ninformation source by it's nature is fallible, because humans are involved. Unfortunately there is a creed of people (called journalists) that thing that journalists can never be really wrong in fact unless something is against their political beliefs.
That does clearly not fit wikipedia as it is now.
Userfriendly had a good take on subject of reliability in their Friday comic... insulting wikipedia by claiming it is as unreliable as CNN.
The Register has its own provocative style on debates. I do not think that they "need to grow up". Their opinnion articles are (allmost) allways thought provoking, but being opinnion pieces they are ofcourse consisting of opinnions. Are they allways right? ofcourse not.. but even then they usually make good points.
Sad truth of our times is the fact that real news often seem more stupid and fantastic than anything made up.
But the thing this time was a bit different as the page in question was not linked from anywhere else, thus it was not spotted and fixed by anyone else until the stink arose.
Speech of many types has consequences.. everything from inciting to crime to slandering someone can have criminal or civil penalties however you do it.. be it on the street or the net.
That being said, air travel has become very safe during these 100 years of development, I expect spacetravel will also get more and more safe with time.
Also it will be more safe in the begining than air travel was, as we value human lives and the safely more as society now than we did back when air travel was young.
More like 100 mile high club.. but I think the mechanics might get difficult with not gravity to hold you together..
Seems they have difficulty deciding how to do RSS..
Agfter you have gone through the document in that manner, remove any sentences that do not make sense after the word removal, this is the time consuming part and cannot really be automated excep for sentences like "or and ." or such.
After that you are normally left with 0-5 sentences that actually had some content, the number does not seem to depend on the length of the orginal text.
The same type of audience who like all the buzzwords he uses.
Damm.. did not get a line on bullshit bingo (http://www.bullshitbingo.net/cards/bullshit/) got close but no cigarr.. he still needs to add few buzzwords...
That is the "buzzword complience" thing one needs.. but any proper CIO knows that almost all BI products are total crap. Thus there is definitely a trend of "oh your product also does BI?, bye" raising. What is needed is actually GOOD products as the current wave is largely "hype-ware", though there are actually some fairly good(if very complex) products.