Slashdot Mirror


Zero-Gravity Sports League In Development

Jonathan writes "A company that provides weightless flights to paying space tourists is developing a league around a sport that is designed for a zero-G environment." From the article: "The sport is called 'Paraball'...originally short for Parabolic Football," Persaud told SPACE.com. "The game really isn't like football anymore as the rules have developed, but the name has stuck," he added. [..] "The International Parabolic Sports League (IPSL) I plan to start with seven U.S. based teams, plus one Toronto-based team. Initially all League games would be played from the Las Vegas, Nevada airport, but we'll have 'home' games when the Zero-Gravity Corporation are able to bring their aircraft to that many cities over the time span of the league's season."

205 comments

  1. Another exclusive club forming: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "ten mile high" club

    1. Re:Another exclusive club forming: by luvirini · · Score: 3, Funny

      More like 100 mile high club.. but I think the mechanics might get difficult with not gravity to hold you together..

    2. Re:Another exclusive club forming: by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      but I think the mechanics might get difficult with not gravity to hold you together.

      Some of us are developing "handles" to alleviate that problem.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:Another exclusive club forming: by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

      Well, we actually fly between 24k and 34k feet....so it's closer to 5 miles ;)

  2. Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by rednip · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll be the only team sport where a airplane crash would take out both teams, the officials, and staff. Seriously, does anyone know how safe these fights are?

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, the Vomit Comet (and similar planes) are just amazingly dangerous. I mean, that's why it's only been in operation for 30 years without incident.

      Commercial air planes are incredibly safe. It requires a major fuckup to cause a crash, even when doing odd things (like freefall.)

    2. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by luvirini · · Score: 0
      Basically space flight will allways be more dangerous than air travel because the total energies used are so much higher.

      That being said, air travel has become very safe during these 100 years of development, I expect spacetravel will also get more and more safe with time.

      Also it will be more safe in the begining than air travel was, as we value human lives and the safely more as society now than we did back when air travel was young.

    3. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by spacefight · · Score: 5, Funny

      An airplane crash can kill both teams, the officials and staff on countless other sport events if targeted accurate enough.

    4. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In answer to that; when was the last time you heard of a 'Vomit Comet' crashing? They're pretty safe really and quite regular flights for astronaut and pilot training.

      Having said that, each cycle on the vomit comet only gives you 20-25 seconds of weightlessness, so there's going to be plenty of ad breaks...

    5. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Funny

      as long as we have Jay Feely pilot the plane, we won't have to worry that it has such accuracy

    6. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by motorbikematt · · Score: 5, Informative

      The flights are pretty darn safe. I am a flight coach for ZeroG and I can attest that our pilots and flight crew are some of the best. The flight crew are an excellent bunch of cargo aircraft pilots that have undergone extensive training for parabolic flight. Parabolas that can produce zero gravity in the cabin require a skill and talent that is hard to come by. We've got experts, and I'd argue that they are AT LEAST as good as the NASA folks. As for the aircraft, ZeroG has gone through years of proving to the FAA that they are safe to fly. All aircraft mods have been approved by a Supplemental Type Certificate, and we have been granted permission to fly under Part 121 of FAA regulations. Moreover, NASA has been flying these types of flights with the KC-135, a DC-9, and other aircraft in the past, and have flown without any major incidents. As for the folks in the back of the aircraft, the flight director, coaches and FAA certified Flight Attendant, we are all experienced parabolic flyers, and typically we also fly with an an astronaut. Personally, I have flown with NASA several times, and I can say that my goal is to be at least as good as the experts currently at Johnson Space Center. Point is, we've all got 'parabola legs' if you will, and I think we do a pretty darn good job taking care of our customers in the tourism, entertainment, and research sectors. Have any questions...Look me up and email me.

    7. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your upcomign visit from the Department of Homeland security . . .

    8. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the Department of Fatherland Security allow this? We all know that terrorist are very fit and would easily infiltrade this sport!

    9. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by rspeed · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this to 6!

    10. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by deadhammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically, now that commercial space travel is becoming a possibility, we're going to see tremendous advances not only in terms of safety, but also usability. That's the whole reason air travel is as safe as it is: everyone's been doing it, so we know a lot about it. Space travel's been, essentially, stuck in the lab for the past fifty years or so. If the Wright Brothers had kept as tight of a lid of flight as NASA has kept on space flight, we'd still be crossing the ocean in steamer ships.

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    11. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      so is it like the vomit comet (nasa airliner that does parabolic shaped dives and climbs to simulate 0g on the airliner (astronaut training)) or is it like nasa's swimming pool 0g simulation

    12. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by BaGGyGCX · · Score: 1

      Moreover, NASA has been flying these types of flights with the KC-135, a DC-9, and other aircraft in the past, and have flown without any major incidents.

      So a major incident is a both teams dying and staff, is a minor death just one teammate death?

    13. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by motorbikematt · · Score: 3, Funny
      is a minor death just one teammate death?

      Well, I suppose that actually depends upon the Fantasy Paraball rankings ;)

    14. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by BaGGyGCX · · Score: 1

      Hahah execellent response.. I am however interested in a video tour of the plane and stuff.. as well as this sport :)

    15. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      I once met one of the early German Rocket Scientists and he was a proud member of the group that rode the "vomit comet." They had a cute name for their club which at this moment I don't remember. It was something about violating the law of gravity and funny. Maybe somebody here will remind me of the cute name they had.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    16. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

      ZeroG uses a 727-200 aircraft. It is essentially the same size as the KC-135 aircraft, except that it has three cleaner burning, EPA approved engines versus the old four that smoked out Ellington Field on take-off.

    17. Re:Vomit comet meets competitive TV sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you post this?

  3. So how do you play? by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would be nice if the article gave a few details about the sport - just basic stuff like the number of balls or players involved.

    1. Re:So how do you play? by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like the only "ball" based sport in the world where you need to be a multi-millionaire to afford a playing field.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:So how do you play? by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say there'll be at least two balls per player.

    3. Re:So how do you play? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      not if it's a women's league...

    4. Re:So how do you play? by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Depends on if they're European women or not.

    5. Re:So how do you play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I don't get it... it that supposed to be funny or something?

    6. Re:So how do you play? by eosp · · Score: 2

      You must be new here.

    7. Re:So how do you play? by garcia · · Score: 1

      I don't see it being much different than any other professional "ball" based spot these days.

    8. Re:So how do you play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      uhh... wha?
      Since when do you need to be a multi-millionaire to practice soccer, football, baseball, basketball, etc...? The parent was basically saying that you can't even learn to play the game unless you're already rolling in dough.

    9. Re:So how do you play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keyword being professional

    10. Re:So how do you play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:So how do you play? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      As people are expected to watch them, very few sports involve more than one ball/puck/point of focus, so I think it's safe to say the answer to your first question is "one". The size, weight, composition etc. of the ball would be worth knowing though.

  4. Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But hey, let's play space football!

    1. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God forbid people devote their time to things other than solving all of mans problems. Besides, you obviously have time to post on Slashdot instead of contributing to the greater good of man.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You still don't have the cure for cancer but had time to post on Slashdot?

    3. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by SamerAdra · · Score: 1

      It was quite obviously a joke...

    4. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like creating a public interest in zero g (ie: space access) won't bring money into research.

      How short sighted.

    5. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so bored, I wish I had cancer, anything besides this...

    6. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no less strange than Chess Boxing!

      http://site.wcbo.org/content/index_en.html

    7. Re:Meanwhile, still no cure for cancer. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I think the "still no cure for cancer" meme is dying out.

      It's funny on fark, but /.'ers tend not to enjoy being told they should spend their time doing something else.

      One of the comments is from a guy (motorbikematt) who's a flight coach for ZeroG jaunts.

      It'd be pretty goddamn rude if the GP went up to him and said "what you do is a joke. Why don't you try to find a cure for cancer."

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  5. Hah by matr0x_x · · Score: 1

    Looks like polo and fox hunting is being replaced as the choice sport of the world's rich

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
    1. Re:Hah by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Fox hunting is not exclusively a sport of the rich. Most fox hunters are middle and upper-middle class.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Hah by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Us poor people stick with the homely chicks.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Hah by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I.e. rich people.

  6. Practical Though? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "It wasn't a dark game, but it wasn't a bright one either-the lights were about half, like dusk. In the distance, in the dim light, he could see the enemy door, their lighted flash suits already pouring out. Ender knew a moments pleasure. Everyone had learned from Bonzo's misuse of Ender Wiggin. They all jumped through the door immediately, so that there was no chance to do anything other than name the formation they would use."
    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Practical Though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded redundant? It's the first Ender's Game reference here, and it has thus saved me from typing one myself.

      Kudos.

    2. Re:Practical Though? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Ender's Game too...

    3. Re:Practical Though? by DKua · · Score: 1

      Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow are the same story, told from 2 diffrent points of view. Ender and Bean respectivly

    4. Re:Practical Though? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would certainly be more entertaining than the 10-second game they'll be able to have in a vomit comet!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Practical Though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the first Ender's Game reference here

      No, this one is.

  7. Who Cares. by VonSkippy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wake me when either a:) they invent anti-gravity or b:) they actually play in orbit.

    Until then, it's just a media whore stunt.

    Like car racing, people will watch just hoping for the big crash and burn.

    1. Re:Who Cares. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Until then, it's just a media whore stunt.

      ALL sports are just media whore stunts. None of that shit matters at all. Really! It's sad that so much effort and money is wasted in this pointless enterprise.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Who Cares. by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1

      It's sad that so much effort and money is wasted in this pointless enterprise.

      Sure beats fighting wars. With the money spent on the Iraq war so far ($225B) we could cover the entire state of Wyoming with a grid of football stadiums spaced 20 miles apart. If people find sports entertaining and it increases their quality of life to watch them, I don't have a problem with it. That is, as long as they leave me alone when I decide to watch LotR or read Slashdot or whatever else THEY think is pointless.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    3. Re:Who Cares. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      I don't see a sport taking off where it can't be played by the kids at home. All the popular sports have become popular from the bottom-up. The less accesible the sport is to an average person, the less popular it seems to watch.

      This applies even to mainstream sports - Soccer is #1 in the world. You just need a cheap ball to play and some predefine goals which could be two rocks on the ground. In contrast, relatively mainstream sports like Hockey are still the least popular of the mainstream sports - a lot of equipment and the right conditions. I don't think it even makes a blip on the radar screen in Mexico while it's ultra-popular in Canada, and in the US, well it's in the middle:), there's a reason.

      The only exception I can readily think of is Ice-skating, but that's because of the sheer skill and beauty displayed by the pros.

      This sport has neither advantage - not accessible to be played by the common man nor will the pros be that good (where will they practice and for how long?).

      It's an idea ahead of its time, lacking an audience once the novelty wears off.

    4. Re:Who Cares. by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      Ice skating has a rough analog though.

    5. Re:Who Cares. by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

      I get it, free speech or non-mainstream opinion = flamebait.

      Which fucking moron on slashdot came up with that rule???

      If you don't understand how to moderate - then don't fucking moderate.

    6. Re:Who Cares. by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If people find sports entertaining and it increases their quality of life to watch them, I don't have a problem with it.

      I don't think the parent has a problem with sports themselves, just how much money and effort are poured into them. All over the country you have cities passing bond measures and tax increases to renovate stadiums that in some cases haven't even made back their original construction costs. It's become a neverending cycle of the cities working to outdo each other on the fanciest complex. Then, if a city has more than one professional team, they have to build new complexes for the other sports, too. Meanwhile these same cities have crime issues, homelessness, crumbling sewer infastructure.

      I'm all for an enjoyable sports experience, but sometimes it's just more money than necessary for something that's really unnecessary.

    7. Re:Who Cares. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      NASCAR. It's not even fun to watch and it's way more popular than hockey.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Who Cares. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The only reason people watch NASCAR is for the crashes. There's nothing exciting about watching people drive around in circles for a couple hours. Unless they crash. I've never really understood the popularity of NASCAR myself. Although I don't think it's that popular outside the USA. Even then, I think it's confined to specific parts of the USA.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Who Cares. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Sure, the crashes are why YOU watch. and why I occasionally watch... But there are people who, admittedly very likely drunk, actually find a buncha cars turning left - a lot - exciting. And there are a lot of them.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:Who Cares. by damsa · · Score: 1

      A lot of sports stadiums are located in seedy parts of the city. So bringing in a stadium to that part of the city, also has a positive effect on neighboring businesses and the like. Also there is money coming in from tourism, food, hotels and other ancillary services. Sports stadiums are also used for conventions, car shows, boat shows, monster truck rallies, and concerts. So the entire money to fund stadiums is not wasted. Although personally if a billionaire like Paul Allen wants a stadium, he should build it and not rely on tax payers to fund it.

    11. Re:Who Cares. by damsa · · Score: 1

      F1 is quite popular around the world and the costs of running a F1 team, is much much higher than running a Nascar team. I'm willing to bet that most F1 fans have never set foot on a F1 live event.

    12. Re:Who Cares. by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      But in F1 they also turn right!

      Although even that is getting boring as Schumacher keeps winning so people formed A1GP and another one I can't remember the name of where instead of different cars they all run with the same ones to make it more of the best driver winning, then simply the best car.

    13. Re:Who Cares. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      By popularity are you talking about playing or watching? Lots of yanks watch NFL but none of them actually play it. The same goes for ice hockey and F1.

      Lots of people play football, even in America, but not many watch it.

    14. Re:Who Cares. by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      As a fervent F1 fan...
      No I don't watch for the crashes, No I'm not drunk (although I have to visit my parents and have a beer for the British Grand Prix) and I have never been to see one live.
      So what is the attraction?
      Well it used to be Murray Walker's commentry(http://www.worldmotorsport.com/murray/), now it's the tactics and the tension waiting for that elusive overtaking manouvrue.

      Not a sport for someone with a short attention span certainly, but it certainly frequently ends up with a group of us screaming at the TV...
      But yes I also enjoy Sumo, so I can see the attraction of 30 seconds of action at a time...
      --
      "Do my eyes deceive me, or is Senna's Lotus sounding rough ?"

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    15. Re:Who Cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New stadiums having a positive effect overall is a scam, all they do is push out the porer people who cannot afford to live there. And they are pretty much all, now at least, built with large amounts of taxpayer money. SBC park here in SF should have lost, wonder why hey found all those balot boxes in the bay.

    16. Re:Who Cares. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      This is what makes NASCAR so exciting. They all run the exact same car, to pretty exacting specs. That way, different drivers win different events, depending on how well they do. The problem with "sports" that aren't based mostly on human skill, such as horse racing and F1, is that winning isn't based on how the person did, but how well the machine did. Luckily in horse racing, the win is actually attributed to the horse, who really deserves all the credit anyway.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  8. Why invent a new sport? by vitalyb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The battle-school sport in Ender's Game is complex enough.

    I can even think of a few ways for the freezing guns.

    1. Re:Why invent a new sport? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't they have to change it significantly to avoid getting sued by OSC?

    2. Re:Why invent a new sport? by damiam · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I don't think OSC would have any legal grounds to sue. The Ender's Game sport isn't patented, trademarked, or copyrighted. Besides, why would OSC want to sue them? He'd probably be delighted to see someone using his ideas.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Why invent a new sport? by despik · · Score: 1

      The enemy gate is down!

      --
      "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
    4. Re:Why invent a new sport? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I would have been very dissapointed if no one had posted that.

      Perhaps we should modify it to "The opposing team's endzone is down."

      -Peter

    5. Re:Why invent a new sport? by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      But how would you play that in an area small enough to fit in an aircraft? Also a bigger problem would be the only around 30 seconds of weightlessness you can achieve using airplanes. Wouldn't it pretty much degrade to something akin to old western gun-fights (with non-lethal guns obviously..)?

      --
      Store with salt
  9. Too bad by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I really wish they hadn't done this yet. Zero-G sports WILL happen, but in order for them to take-off (no pun intended) it needs to be less gimmicky than on one of these flights. This is the sort of thing we will have once we have space stations and space tourism where people can easily travel and stay long periods of time in space. And I have no doubt that a new Zero-G sport will develop.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Too bad by sconeu · · Score: 1

      But taunting Happy Fun Ball is part of Paraball!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Too bad by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No. No it is not.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  10. A company that provides weightless flights by xaxat · · Score: 1

    and they have had how many clients in their history? That would be a few short of any type of team.

    1. Re:A company that provides weightless flights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which is why they're trying to make some money off of it...

  11. Cue the Red Dwarf comments by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

    Zero-g football, eh? Do they have a player called Jim Bexley Speed?

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    1. Re:Cue the Red Dwarf comments by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      That doesn't really explain the reference, so here's snips from some random internet sites:
      LISTER: Ah! Now that [picture]'s me with Jim Bexley Speed. He played with the London Jets zero-gravity football team. He was roof attack. As you can see, he was really, really, really, really, really thrilled to meet me.

      ...

      During the 2174 - 2175 season Jim Bexley Speed, London Jets Roof Attack, breaks the all-time record for three-dimensional yardage in a single Zero-Gee football season.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Cue the Red Dwarf comments by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      and don't forget later in the series the rather fun sounding Zero-G Kickboxing

    3. Re:Cue the Red Dwarf comments by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      It's still not as awesome as the BFL:
      http://www.themareks.com/xf/gunmen.html

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Cue the Red Dwarf comments by 1337W422102 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I was going to make a smartass Red Dwarf comment...

  12. pastime for the idle rich by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    I thought polo and yachting were the sports for people with too much money and time on their hands. Well, I guess times change.

    Anyone want to partner with me to develop league of swimming hamsters or weight-lifting mice? Those are sports we can all enjoy (watching, anyway). They could be the WWF of the 21st century.

    But wait, let me patent that, first.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:pastime for the idle rich by Brendor · · Score: 1
      I've always thought that Segway could drive interest in their human transporters by creating a sport where players are attached using ski boot bindings in place of the handlebars and players do battle in a freestyle skate park.

      But that's just me.

      And since I own this comment, I'm not too worries about any implausible prior art lawsuit that could arise.

    2. Re:pastime for the idle rich by cciRRus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone want to partner with me to develop league of swimming hamsters or weight-lifting mice? Those are sports we can all enjoy (watching, anyway. They could be the WWF of the 21st century.

      How the hell did the World Wildlife Fund gotta do with sports? Ahhh, I see... the swimming hamsters and weight-lifting mice.

      --
      w00t
  13. large blobs in space by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    In his research on space sports, Collins and colleagues have speculated about water sports where space tourists can dive through large blobs of water.

    In other news, many games eventually end up turning in to an impromptu old school favorite - 'dodgevomit.'

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  14. Wait a smegging minute... by radiotyler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, I have an excuse to name my twin sons Jim and Bexley.

    --
    hi mom!
  15. Short games... by 3D+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now if only we had a way to simulate Zero-G for longer than 20 seconds

    Otherwise I see some really short games with some really motion-sick players.

    1. Re:Short games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like most American football actions last much longer than that...

      (pass. soccer, please)

  16. Cycle polo by tepples · · Score: 1

    Looks like polo and fox hunting is being replaced as the choice sport of the world's rich

    The conception that polo is only for the rich is horse hockey. It hasn't been true for years, as if you and your teammates have bikes, you can play polo. Segway polo, on the other hand...

  17. New Sports Terms by DiGG3r · · Score: 1

    This sport would re-define the term "Air Ball" into a good thing.

  18. In space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...no one can hear you lose more money than the XFL.

  19. Safety vs Entertainment? by ImaLamer · · Score: 4, Funny
    I don't know if I can take the ups and downs that come with parabolic football...


    (maniacal laughter)

  20. Parabolic? by karmaflux · · Score: 0

    In zero gravity, things wouldn't travel in parabolic arcs. You need gravity for that.

    Not that "zero gravity" exists, anyway. If I REALLY want to shift into Pedantic Nerd mode, where there's matter, there's gravity.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:Parabolic? by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1

      But the playing arena does travel in a parabolic arc. Well for all intents and purposes.

    2. Re:Parabolic? by Hillbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parabolic refers to the flight path used by the planes in order to simulate the weightlessness you typically see in spaceflight, not the path of the ball or anything else inside the plane.

    3. Re:Parabolic? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Actually, to an outside observer, the plane, and the ball, and the players would all be moving in a parabolic way. However, this is a stupid sport, as they can only remain weightless for 20 seconds.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Parabolic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, this is a stupid sport, as they can only remain weightless for 20 seconds.

      Which is long enough for a complete "play" in that stupid Septic football, and not too long that the audience will bored between ad breaks.

    5. Re:Parabolic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need zero gravity for weightlessness. Astronouts feel weightless not because they are "far enough" from Earth, but because they are in constant free fall.

  21. Waitaminute ... this sounds familiar ... by ggvaidya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Paraball is seen as a cross of several sports...and has a lot of unique aspects too.

    Calvinball!!!

    1. Re:Waitaminute ... this sounds familiar ... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, this is a great topic. We get Calvin and Ender at the same time! But seriously...When in high school a group of friends stared playing Calvin Ball. At first it was a joke but it became a game where quick wits and the ability to debate while lobing volleyballs at your opponents head was helpful. The game became a standard for my friends who wrote short stores, the frenzied, gooey and strenuous environment spawned creativity. A 0g version of that game would be a great way to inspire creativity in the right group of people.

      --
      We are the Borg...
  22. Zero-G Athletes? by Aphrika · · Score: 1

    Sounds interesting, although I'd love to know what characteristics the ideal zero-G athlete would have. Would it help to be thin and light in a weightless environment, or would an earth-bound athletic build work best?

    Assuming zero-G contact sports appear, mass and inertia would suddenly make a huge difference to play, as would the ability to have three dimensional game areas. I'm surprised that space sports haven't really made it into mainstream sci-fi - short of Kirk prancing around arenas and the like. I have a vague feeling Arthur C Clarke touched on it once, but I can't recall the book title.

    One question though; if swimming took place in zero-G, would you move through the water, or just scoop it out of the pool?

    1. Re:Zero-G Athletes? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Ahhhhhh but space sports DO exist.
      Lots of us take part in space sports games every day, the computer is good at rendering them and we have decent control mechanisms.

      The movies haven't got really into it, I believe because its so damned difficult to do realistic zero-g scenes.
      Its one thing to have a couple of actors floating across the camera than to have an entire arena with real actors and lots of 3d action occuring.
      (side note, harry potter quiditch(???) seems to be closest to the zero-g sporting mark I have seen.)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Zero-G Athletes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there wouldn't be a pool. You'd have a very large blob of water floating in the room. As people entered it, you would get small blobs breaking away and moving towards the walls. The people would swim within the sphere of water (they better have some scuba gear), and cause ripples and undulations of the water blob/sphere.

      I have no idea how strong the surface tension would be, and whether violent swimming in a few thousand litres would be enough to rip the water blob apart or not :) But entry into the water blob would probably start the blob moving in the opposite direction from the swimmer, where it would eventually hit the walls of the room, and then stick/break-up/rebound (all at once) :)
      Messy :)

    3. Re:Zero-G Athletes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One question though; if swimming took place in zero-G, would you move through the water, or just scoop it out of the pool?

      On a very basic level, both. Assuming that your "pool" is a blob of water, as people swim through it (into it?), they would push the water backwards. This would 'scoop it out' (well, it would more likely break off a blob and send it sailing off to collide with something else). Momentum conservation says the person would have to move forward.

      Of course, it's much more complicated than that, and I'm sure, this being /., that someone will point out just why that is. However, on a basic level that's about what happens.

    4. Re:Zero-G Athletes? by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      I'm surprised that space sports haven't really made it into mainstream sci-fi - short of Kirk prancing around arenas and the like. I have a vague feeling Arthur C Clarke touched on it once, but I can't recall the book title.
      Not Clarke, as far as I can recall, but definitely Steven Barnes with _Streetlethal_ from 1983. It prominently features zero-G wrestling.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  23. The losing team... by oaksey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The losing team should get tossed out of the plane (with parachutes of course), with the winners just getting flown straight home. Would make it a bit more dramatic for TV.

    1. Re:The losing team... by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      How about each point you score gives you one parachute, losing team is thrown out. That would make it REALLY interesting ;)

  24. Re: nerd mode by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

    Yes. It's pedantic and not semantic. Well done!

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  25. So where do the spectators go? by Crovax+of+404 · · Score: 1

    Do you have bleachers to seat 20,000 people on an airplane? It's a nice little fantasy but there's no way a sport like that could ever be profitable.

    1. Re:So where do the spectators go? by damsa · · Score: 1

      Poker has been pretty profitable without a need for a large paying crowds. Then again, calling poker a sport. That's something else.

    2. Re:So where do the spectators go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spectators watch it on TV. Look at other sports, the majority of revenue is from television, sponsorships and merchanizing, not ticket sales.

  26. zero or negative? by Belseth · · Score: 1

    In truth it's just mimicing zero gee. It's really freefall inside an airplane when you get right down to it. The major differences between it and sky diving are no chutes, no rushing air and you have walls around you to push off from. Oh you you don't have that sudden decelloration when you hit the ground. The nausea is worse than zero gees because it's the negative gees you get from falling. Seems like a pointless novelty but so is Reality TV.

    1. Re:zero or negative? by cnettel · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry, but you get no negative gees from falling. This is no less true than being in a permanent orbit all the time. In fact, a plane doing this in the proper way is actually describing a very short part of a very elongated orbit. The only trouble in making it permanent is that this orbit intersects the planet surface.

      With an ideal point mass and any second object with any tangential speed as the initial situation will never crash into that point mass, only orbit it. If you are far enough from the point, you'll also experience zero G (if you are close, you'll experience the effects of, say, your feet being farther away from the point mass than your head; and any ball or something you throw will, after time, establish an orbit on its own, distinct from your own -- however, this is also true if you throw something away from ISS or anything).

      There is no magic zero G space in space. Remember, the sun is holding the complete solar system together. Still, you can experience zero G, by just leaving Earth, but that is only because continous free fall is practical there. You don't "see" gravity, as the floor, walls and objects you travel with are experiencing the same effect.

    2. Re:zero or negative? by motorbikematt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I would like to point out that you can achive a negative-G in parabolic flight. This can occur due to turbulence or some other effect where the acceleration of the aircraft exceeds the 9.8m/s^2.

      Basically, what happens is that you get sent upwards toward the ceiling. In fact, a slight negative at the start of a zero gravity parabola lifts people off the floor mats in pleasent way.

      Trust me, I've done it ;)

  27. Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by Sigfried · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In "The Inventions of Daedalus", scientist and author David E. Jones points out that Xenon is a noble gas with a density greater than water. If you combine Xenon with oxygen and put it in a really big tank, you will have a breathable gas in a tank, in which human being can float. By combining xenon with appropriate amounts of nitrogen, you can get the density close to that of humans, and it will be similar to weightlessness. Wikipedia points out that Xenon has some anaesthetic effects, which would come in handy for those bruising scrimmages...

  28. Name of the 'sport' by Perey · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The game really isn't like football anymore as the rules have developed, but the name has stuck," he added.

    Ahh, much like American 'football' then?

  29. IPX Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the company that is behind it:
    http://www.ipxentertainment.com/

    There's also a short survey there that may be a little simplistic: http://www.ipxentertainment.com/6.html

    Looks like this will be coming to us on bittorrent at spacechannel.tv

    1. Re:IPX Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPX... isn't that the name of the company in Babylon 5 that found the Shadows on Z'Ha'Dum?

    2. Re:IPX Entertainment by javachip · · Score: 1

      Hell, at first blush, I was wondering whether Novell was trying to diversify...

      --
      The chief obstacle to the progress of the human race is the human race. - Don Marquis (1878-1937)
  30. How long do they have weightlessness? by coleblak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because the vomit comet only has like twenty five seconds in a minute long flight. A twenty second long game may be about right for the average American kid nowadays but I don't see the entertainment value at all.

    --
    77 HITS
    Really Long Off Topic Combo
    1. Re:How long do they have weightlessness? by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
      Because the vomit comet only has like twenty five seconds in a minute long flight

      This is incorrect. Parabolic flight typically involves SEVERAL parabolas. For research, NASA and ZeroG both have done between 40 and 60 parabolas, where each parabola experiences anywhere between 20-35 seconds of zero gravity and about as long in 1.8g for the pull-outs. For tourism or a typical entertainment flight, ZeroG may fly about 15 parabolas. What people need to realize though is that parabolas can be tuned to not just achieve zero gravity, but also reduced gravity such as that found on Mars and the Moon. These parabolas are shallower and therefore the experience is longer.

    2. Re:How long do they have weightlessness? by coleblak · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I meant to say they would have only 25 seconds of weightlessness per parabolic, not per flight. Too much reading and typing, not enough sleep or editing.

      --
      77 HITS
      Really Long Off Topic Combo
    3. Re:How long do they have weightlessness? by yotto · · Score: 1

      *Parabolic flight typically involves SEVERAL parabolas... each parabola experiences anywhere between 20-35 seconds of zero gravity*

      So, what you're saying is they should scrap the idea of 0-G football and instead do 0-G basketball. 20-35 seconds between timeouts sounds about right for that.

    4. Re:How long do they have weightlessness? by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
      Actually, that is funny, because in Lunar paraboloas you can do jumps like the Michael Jordan posed logo on his 'Air' shoes. Indeed, these reduced gravity scenarios are in many cases far more fun, it is not as foreign as Zero as you still have control and still know which way is down.

      Zero gravity is really cool, but Lunar and Martian are where the real fun is. And if you're strong enough, 1.8 Gs can be fun too.

  31. Take it to the next level! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they need to play some Space Quidditch!

  32. "Vomit Comet" could never be used for such things by everphilski · · Score: 1

    The vomit comet gives you seconds of "micrgravity" and its crappy at that. You can't do protein and crystal research in that. Its better that they find commercially viable outlets - like this, commercial space tourists, etc. - to keep themselves afloat.

    Protein and crystal growth requires days and weeks of microgravity. And don't say ISS... the vibrations of humans aboard are significant enough to disturb it. You need a freefloating platform with no humans or vibrating experiments onboard. Or at least an experiment bay tethered to ISS by a loose nylon cable with no tension over the experiment period.

    -everphilski-

  33. Can it be performed in 30ish seconds? by everphilski · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cause thats all you got in a vomit comet...

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Can it be performed in 30ish seconds? by lxs · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, isn't that what American Football is about? 30 seconds of play followed by 15 minutes of standing around?

      But I wouldn't know, being European myself, I am more into the kind of football where two teams run around the field for two hours without scoring a single point.

    2. Re:Can it be performed in 30ish seconds? by Salis · · Score: 1

      That's very similar to another game I've heard of.

      There's 191 teams that all run around the field for months on end with no one scoring or even attempting to score.

      It's called the UN. ;)

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    3. Re:Can it be performed in 30ish seconds? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      There's 191 teams that all run around the field for months on end with no one scoring or even attempting to score. It's called the UN. ;)

      The other teams all try to score, but the USA has a very good goalkeeper.

  34. Meanwhile, I don't see you trying to cure cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I see you complaining instead.

  35. fuel fo this? by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

    It'd be funny if the stars of the game would preach fuel efficient cars

  36. They have to wait by dvdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously these guys are trying to break the rules. When it comes to entertainment, porn has to do it first. FIRST Zero-G porn movies, THEN sports. Duh...

    1. Re:They have to wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "FIRST Zero-G porn movies, THEN sports."

      Porn was there 6 years ago... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/

  37. Another Elitist Sport. Why? by hagrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does the world really need yet another elitist sport not played by the best athletes in the world and played only by those with the means to afford such a sport? How about we try using the thousands of baseball fields around the United States that go unused - even fields that exist in urban environments.

    Maybe zero gravity development leagues will be part of the 2006 fiscal budget for inner city youth to participate.

  38. I'm all for equal access for the disabled... by tswann01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but won't all those wheelchairs flying around hurt someone?

    Oh, you said "parabolic" -- I thought... oh, nevermind.

  39. 3d-space sports RULE by Foktip · · Score: 1

    sweet, a sport that lets you move in 3d space ... now you can do even more crazy stuff!

    this would be one intense sport.. fast-paced, zany multi-directional nonsensical movement and stuff; it'd be like football on crack

    1. Re:3d-space sports RULE by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      sweet, a sport that lets you move in 3d space ...

      Not that it's the first one though.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:3d-space sports RULE by HardCase · · Score: 1

      ...it'd be like football on crack

      Wasn't that the XFL's tagline?

      -h-

    3. Re:3d-space sports RULE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering all the black people, I figured football already was fueled on crack.

  40. Zero-G porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to see space porn movies .... If this is just a PR campaign for their company.. this would definitely draws some attention.

    1. Re:Zero-G porn by javachip · · Score: 1

      If each zero-G portion lasts less than a minute, it shouldn't be too difficult to find "stars" that can complete their "activities" within that time frame. I mean, why shouldn't folks suffering from premature ejaculation be able to contribute to the porn industry!

      --
      The chief obstacle to the progress of the human race is the human race. - Don Marquis (1878-1937)
    2. Re:Zero-G porn by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but I think with decent editing, they could do the same tricks they used to film apollo 13 (the Tom Hanks one, not the real one :-)) and piece together the footage with careful editing so it looks like they spent 30 minuts in zero G

      Can't see why a similer highlights version wouldn't work for sports too - I image most of the revenue comes from TV based promotion in most sports these days, so where's the problem here???

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  41. Yes, because the fun is in the 1.8Gs by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the athletes have to deal with 1.8G pullouts AND there are of course options for Martian and Lunar and other percentages of 1 Earth Gravity

  42. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by atomicdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    As indicated by the Wikipedia article you linked to, xenon has the density of 5.864 g/L at 0 C. This can easily be double checked using the atomic weight and knowing that a mole at STP takes up 22.4 L: 131.3 g/mol / (22.4 L/mol) = 5.85 g/L. Water has a density of about 1 kg/L.

  43. Slam Ball by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I love how they try to invent new sports, in order to make money. If a sport makes X $ per year, then we can invent a new sport, and also make X $ a year. This makes no sense, as people don't want to watch new sports. They've tried it a few times, and it never really works that well. Sometimes, you get small cult followings, but never do you get to the level of the mega sports that are currently popular. This is going to go the way of slam ball. Which was a similarly stupid Idea. Watching people dunk isn't exciting once you realize that anyone could dunk if you gave them a trampelline.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Slam Ball by damsa · · Score: 1

      There are some new sports that came out of a cult following that now have mainstream audiences. Nascar auto racing, Poker, Wrestling, and Ultimate Fighting Championship. Of course purists will argue that none of the above are actually sports. But you get the idea.

  44. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this mean that Xenon would be mined at the bottom of lakes, and perhaps the ocean?

  45. I dont think so by CyborgWarrior · · Score: 1

    I dont think it was a joke. And even if it was, there are many people who honestly believe this. The problem is that few of them understand the actual politics, etc behind the progress of science. There are actually research projects involve Zero-G bases in new areas of cancer research (quick digging came up with this article, I've heard of others). The truth is that the development of any new technologies will provide new avenues in this research.

    This Zero-G Sports League is awesome because if there is one seemingly pointless thing that people love to spend money on, it's sports. If you don't believe me look at statistics about the money spent on beer for the celebration of the Super Bowl and other such events. If we can get a successful space based sport then other things such as advertising will move to put money into space based work, which will motivate the market and give a major boost to research in that direction.

    The moral of the story: this type of work really is indirectly contributing to research that could one day cure cancer.

    --
    If you can't say something nice, make sure you have something heavy to throw.
    1. Re:I dont think so by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      i can only imagine the day when we combine beer and 0g sport

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  46. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    That would be SO COOL. If you don't like the anaesthetic stuff, or if Xenon + oxygen is too rich and makes people lightheaded or something, just give 'em small little air canisters. Easier than underwater, but still seperate from what they're swimming in.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  47. I'm reminded of a saying... by emptycorp · · Score: 1

    Quoth ThinkGeek: Obey gravity, it's the law!

    1. Re:I'm reminded of a saying... by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because some of the ZeroG T-Shirts say "Newton Lied" and "Break the Law". I'd post a link where you can see them, but just do a Google search and you'll find them.

  48. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by Council · · Score: 2, Informative
    In "The Inventions of Daedalus", scientist and author David E. Jones points out that Xenon is a noble gas with a density greater than water. If you combine Xenon with oxygen and put it in a really big tank, you will have a breathable gas in a tank, in which human being can float. By combining xenon with appropriate amounts of nitrogen, you can get the density close to that of humans, and it will be similar to weightlessness.

    Wait, it doesn't seem like that would work at all. It doesn't look like Xenon has a density anywhere near that of water. And even if it did, as a gas Xenon would be compressable, which means the density would vary dramatically with depth -- you'd have a particular height you floated at, and going down ten meters would double the pressure and the density and the lift. If it really had a density close to that of water, it would act like (compressable) water, and you'd float on it at a certain level. But it doesn't and you wouldn't.
    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  49. Pararena by coldcup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a game for mac, around the time of the Macintosh Classic called Pararena. It was a single player, or network multiplayer game where you have two people in a bowl like arena and two goals, similar to soccer. Two players ride hovering platforms and fly around the arena, trying to get the ball into their goal. If you fall out of the arena, the other player gets a point. If you get knocked out of the arena, the other player gets a point.

    I wasted quite a few days playing that game...

  50. Important thing to remember: by qplnm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The enemy gate is down.

    1. Re:Important thing to remember: by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Ho qplnm.

  51. More on Zero-G; John Carmack's thoughts by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article didn't have too much info on Zero-G's service, so I thought I'd chime in. Basically, Zero-G sells flights on their modified Boeing 727 at $3,750 each. Each flight has a total of 15 parabolas, which alternate between 1.8 g's and either zero g's, lunar g's, or martian g's; each of the low/zero gravity periods lasts 30 seconds.

    John Carmack, of id Software fame, flew with Zero-G last year and wrote down some of his thoughts. He was pretty pleased with it, and got some ideas for his spaceflight company. He also recorded a video of messing around in zero-gravity. Here's an excerpt from his write-up:

    The time went by so quickly that you completely forgot half the things you planned on trying. A couple of us were doing low gravity judo throws, and I took a shot at the worlds first flying armbar in zero gravity (didn't work out too well). Most of us that were doing fairly aggressive bouncing around landed on our heads at least once, so I have some concern that they will eventually have someone test the liability waiver. The bottom line is that I highly recommend the experience, and I am almost certainly going to do it again at some point.

    1. Re:More on Zero-G; John Carmack's thoughts by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
      To add a bit more insight to this...ZeroG currently operates out of Fort Lauderdale, however, we are starting to offer flights out of Kennedy Space Center, in fact, right off the Space Shuttle Landing Facility.

      Individual seats are about $3,700 as noted by FleaPlus, but it is possible to book an entire flight for parties, which we've done a few times now.

      For the researchers, we have successfully flown with NASA out of Ellington Field in Houston and are currently making flights available to NASA and individual (private & academic) researchers.

      Lastly, I'd like to point out that we're really striving to reduce the price for each individual seat. Keep your eyes on the website over this year to see what we're able to do.

      Have any questions? Look me up and drop me an email.

  52. International... pfff... by joey_knisch · · Score: 1

    Why limit it to international play? They should call it the Intergalactic Parabolic Sports League and send some invites for the 2505 games.

    1. Re:International... pfff... by Ava3ar · · Score: 1

      hey they only invited the canadian team so it wasnt just hte UPA (United Planet of America), since we know thats the only country on here

      --
      ¦^)= The Vengance Will Come =(^¦
  53. Zerogravity-racing by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I just RTFA; I had though it was about Motorcycles http://www.zerogravity-racing.com/

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  54. Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flight by motorbikematt · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here's the link to our website: www.nogravity.com

    Here's a link to some of the photos taken on board with some of our tourists: zero-g.smugmug.com

    Here's a link to a recent local news video covering our very first flights from KSC: www.wesh.com/spacenews/5267185/detail.html

    And, for those of you who watched American TV last night, you would have seen us on NBC's Three Wishes and if you're really a couch potato, you've seen us on The Apprentice, The Biggest Loser, and The Rebel Millionare

  55. spacefight = Tom Clancy by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this THE Tom Clancy? I'm a big admirer of your work, and I'm glad to see you're already working on a new book in which neofascists kill the Miami Heat with a KC-130.

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  56. Re: nerd mode by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

    I thought I was the only one annoyed by that. It's good to see there are others out there.

  57. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by BaGGyGCX · · Score: 1

    I so wish I could afford to do something like this... your soo lucky!

  58. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
    We are working on it. Trust me, I want everyone to be able to experience this. We are a young and small business, and as we grow and establish ourselves, the price should come down. The rules of the free market still apply. Soon, just keep checking the ZeroG website.

    So far we've had 80 something year old men and women fly with us...so chances are that if you seriously start saving now for it, the intersection of how much you've saved and how much the price has come down will be sooner than you think!

  59. Umm... How long are the games? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    This is apparently done by artificially creating zero-G environments.

    Which can't be done for a very long duration at a time, right?

    What got me wondering first when reading this was how they can all get a game going during that short time, let alone start building an entire league around it! But then again, sumo wrestling matches are usually over within seconds, so maybe I shouldn't open my mouth here. :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  60. Parabolic football? Not even close! by rednox · · Score: 0

    They felt the need to explain why the name was similar to football? With the only word in common being "ball"? I would worry more about explaining why they used "para" from the word "parabolic".

    If you throw a ball in zero gravity, it will travel in a straight line, not along a parabola.

    Gravity makes a thrown ball travel along a parabola. So being designed for zero-g, "paraball" is the very first official ball-based game that has absolutely nothing to do with parabolas.

    Although if you want to pick nits, since the airplane is travelling along a parabola to create a zero-g environment for the players, the ball within the plane is travelling along a parabola relative to the earth. Relative to the playing field (the plane), it's all straight lines.

    1. Re:Parabolic football? Not even close! by Filthysock · · Score: 1

      planes flies in a parabola . They play with a ball on a plane.

      Pretty simple really.

    2. Re:Parabolic football? Not even close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the GP understood that since he mentioned it in his post.

  61. I see a BIG problem. by iconeternal · · Score: 1

    Alright, Football players in the NFL practice EVERY DAY. They practice throughout the offseason, and for hours upon hours leading up to the preseason, and then they pracitce every day until the season ends. I'm sure other professional atheletes train just as rigorously, and with good reason, they get paid a lot to play a sport. How are these paraball players supposed to practice? I don't see 7 of these planes flying 6 hours a day, doing parabola after parabola, for 9 months out of the year. Hell, I don't even think it's realistic that they do parabolas three times a week for two months. That's a whole lot of fuel, a whole lot of crew time, bottom line, a whole lot of overhead. Say what you want, but I refuse to believe the will be able to practice on the ground, and have it anywhere near worthwhile. Think about this. Remember astroturf, and how football players who practiced on grass all summer long would take to playing on astroturf, and they'd get injuries left and right. It's because an athlete is a finely tuned machine, who has taught his body to do a small number of things, extremely effeciently. You and I could play football on either field all day long and it wouldn't matter, but these athletes know their abilities so well, that when you change any small variable, not only does their effeciency drop exponentially, but they even end up injuring themselves! The difference between grass and astroturf is a lot smaller than the difference between normal gravity, and total weightlessness.

  62. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, the Porn industry would pay you guys' big bucks!!! Think about it; a new DVD titled "Zero-G Spot" or something. I mean, video of zero-g sex in action would be very unique to the market. Talk about a venture partnership to capitalize on.

    Also, imagine Zero-G fighting championships. Ohh AWSOME idea! Spike TV would love this. Hell, a new martial art might even be formed out of it (bouncing off walls and stuff to go for that headlock). The kicks, punches, rebounds *drool*

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  63. Underwater Football by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

    Well, there's always Underwater Football. Its got simmilar aspects of 3-dimentionality, and it's fun.

  64. Remember...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The enemy goalie is down

  65. Re:Another Elitist Sport. Why? by Gogo0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Elitist, sure, but what other major sports are like that?
    Kids get scouted in high school and get scholarships to colleges for football, hockey, baseball, and other sports. It doesnt matter how rich they are or what school they go to, if theyre good then a scout will come check them out.
    Hell, the NBA is full of kids who drop out of high school to play profesionally.

    Maybe another elitist sport is a good thing. If kids cant afford to play it, then perhaps they'll stay in school and go to college.

  66. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Soon, just keep checking the ZeroG website.

    Just as a quick FYI, when I tried to go to the main page in Firefox/Linux, I just got a blank screen, presumably because of Flash/Shockwave. You folks might want to add a normal link at the bottom of the splash screen to a page like this.

  67. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by motorbikematt · · Score: 1

    Thank you, I will report that immediately.

  68. Still cheaper than golf... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

    I came up with this AWESOME sport where we could use military-spec Humvees to play polo.. But, the field would be the inside of a shopping mall. It would be awesome because the Humvees would totally trash the place. Also, the ball would be solid gold because it looks pretty and would be nice and heavy for the Humvees.

    But, the stupid venture capitalists said it was too expensive.. And then I have to see this?! WTF.. My game was WAYY cheaper than this proposal.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  69. Frame of reference by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "Negative-G" is a simplistic way of describing the experience of moving within the frame of reference of the plane's interior. What they mean is "differential acceleration of plane and passanger in a given direction" using the arbritary choice that "gravitaional acceleration toward Earth" is +1G because it is constant for both plane and passenger. In level flight the plane has an upward acceleration of 1G so it is, in effect, "weightless", meanwile the passangers arse still feels 1G of downward acceleration on to the seat inside the plane (normal feeling of gravity).

    It's all about frames of reference, there is no "fixed point" anywhere in the Universe, Physicist are therefore free to choose the most convienient one.

    Mixing frames of reference can be conceptually difficult, it's easier for the vomit comet's stewardess to say...
    "Negative-G is when turbulence accelerates the plane downward faster than the 9.8m/sec/sec of gravity"
    .....silence....
    "it makes you stick to the ceiling"
    ...knowing nods all round.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Frame of reference by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
      "negative-g" is not just a "simplistic way", as you say, but a defined and measureable parameter recorded and indicated by the accelerometers. Frame of reference notwithstanding, "negative-g" is a real term to accurately describe a real phenomenon.

      Technically, you're not wrong, but the pedantics here confuse the issue a bit more than necessary, don't ya think? I know this is Slashdot and all but really.

    2. Re:Frame of reference by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "the pedantics here confuse the issue a bit more than necessary"

      Yes, but I think the confusion comes from mesuring (de)acceleration in terms of "G".

      "Frame of reference notwithstanding, "negative-g" is a real term to accurately describe a real phenomenon."

      Yes except for the accurate part, for it to be accurate (pedantic) you must assume the ground is under the plane, that is why I called it simplistic, you can't ignore the frame of reference. Pilots have been know to crash and sailors have drowned because of confusion about up and down.

      For example: If the passanger has no windows and the pilot performs a slow "wing roll" while in the "zero-G" stage, how do the passengers tell up from down? Even if they noticed the rotation how would they tell if it was the plane or thier body that was rotating? When they pull out of the curve upside down does that mean there is now a strong "negative-G" slaming the passenger into the ceiling, that's what the instrumentation says?

      The frame of reference matters, the physicist in the plane thinks they are getting pulled upwards, the pilot knows the instrument is wrong because the plane is "upside down". The physicist on the ground does not measure any of the forces with a negative sign. She picks a convinient "fixed point" and observes initial positions and velocities then creates a vector for each of the forces involved. The directional part of the vector is orientated so that acceleration is always positive. The profound part (as opposed to pedantic) is there are no fixed points, everything is relative.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Frame of reference by motorbikematt · · Score: 1
      Correct on all points again; however, I'm once again reminded of the differences between a scientist and an engineer...

      ...these discussions are better served in the classroom or with a pint of beer!

  70. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you've been huffing a bit too much Xenon yourself - if you even read the Wikipedia article you linked to, you will see that the physical characteristics of Xenon, in particular it's density, is 5.9g/L - water weighing in at pretty much spot on 1000g/L. Now, I'd like to see a gas that's heavier than a liquid, but it's just not going to happen.
    What would be cool would be a huge tank full of Perfluorocarbon which is the fluid used in Liquid Breathing systems

  71. Why not? by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The world doesn't have to need it. Nobody has to need it, because "need" is utterly tangential. It's their money, not yours. Go take your egalitarianism, stick it in your pipe and smoke it.

    BTW, seems to me that squash would be a more sensible zero-g game than football. It's fast, simple, ballistic, and it only needs two participants.

  72. missing the biggest business opportunity by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    Zero-gravity pr0n is obviously the biggest business opportunity.

  73. Mine will be better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw their Zero G business! I'm going to start my own zero-g company, with blackjack! And hookers!

  74. YAY for RPG nerds!! by Red+Samurai · · Score: 1

    We're getting closer and closer to playing blitzball!

  75. o brave new world... by legalize.ganja.now. · · Score: 1
    i guess we don't have to wait much longer for "Centrifugal Bumble-Puppy", "Riemann Surface Tennis", and "Electro-Magnetic Golf"!

    Community, Identity, Stability.

  76. Don't forget the space corps. directives by palad1 · · Score: 1
    Space Corps Directive #34124
    No officer with false teeth should attempt oral sex in zero gravity
  77. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, some pretty clueless replies. why would you think they'd be using xenon at 1atm? noble gases are the same thing they mix into dive tanks for deeper dives to handle high pressure. just because you can pull a number off a web page doesn't mean you understand it, I guess.

  78. blobs of water by Ricken · · Score: 1

    In his research on space sports, Collins and colleagues have speculated about water sports where space tourists can dive through large blobs of water. Blitzball anyone?

  79. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Something tells me humans can't survive 200+ psi.

  80. Oblig. Red Dwarf reference by SamSim · · Score: 1

    My question is whether anybody is likely to break Jim Bexley Speed's all-time single-season three-dimensional yardage record. I honestly don't think the London Jets ever had a better Roof Attacker.

  81. Re:Some pictures and video of ZeroG parabolic flig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the Porn industry would pay you guys' big bucks!!! Think about it; a new DVD titled "Zero-G Spot" or something. I mean, video of zero-g sex in action would be very unique to the market.

    There is another theory ...

  82. It's been done by grimJester · · Score: 1
  83. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by Sigfried · · Score: 1

    The replies to my note are quite correct. I tracked down my old copy of "The Inventions of Daedalus", and in the chapter on the xenon tank David Jones notes that the critical density of xenon is 1154 kg / m^3 at 16.6 degrees C and (important point) 58 atmospheres of pressure. This is very likely not suitable for human use. He also notes that regular saline can dissolve enough oxygen at 5 atmospheres to breath, and that some fluorocarbon liquids can hold enough oxygen at one atmoshere. Still a cool idea!

  84. Team Microsoft by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
    It would be nice if the article gave a few details about the sport - just basic stuff like the number of balls or players involved.
    To answer these in reverse order, I hear the leading team right now is actually Team Microsoft. Number of balls? None.
  85. Re:Xenon + Oxygen = Swim in Breathable Gas! by ineedbettername · · Score: 1

    Blitzball, here I come!