Slashdot Mirror


Reality TV "Astronauts" Lift Off

RJG writes "In the latest reality show on British TV, three British "space tourists" last night succesfully blasted off on a five day mission and are currently orbiting the earth 200 miles up. Or so they think. And to forestall the first question. They aren't experiencing weightlessness due to a combination of being in a low orbit (rather than outer space where the weightlessness is) and a few under-floor gravity generators."

644 comments

  1. America has officially lost its monopoly on stupid by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny


    Well, at least it's nice to be reassured that stark raving idiocy isn't an exclusively American trait. Apparently, any prospective 'astronaut' who showed even the slightest glimmer of comprehension of the rudimentaries of physics was automatically disqualified. leaving us with the pick of the litter...people who are stupid enough to believe that 'gravity generators' exist, and that exposure to 'near space' will make you shorter and increase your lung capacity.

    Now add to the mix a psycho Russian pilot:
    Pilot Yevgeny Ivanovich joined the passengers for breakfast, and was asked about the colour painted on his finger. He told them it was a superstition of his. In faltering English he tried to explain his reliance on superstition. "The devil's strokes are sexy. He likes to be somebody sexy, the devil."

    He told them that every day he's in space he paints another finger.
    ...and the hilarity practically writes itself. In fact, perhaps the only way this show could get any more entertaining is if the viewing public were allowed to vote on which indignity the 'astronauts' would have to suffer next.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  2. Dramatic Final Episode by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The last episode will be the best one, when the TV show fakes a leak in the station and they have five minutes to decide which of the three gets the two working space suits. Sort of like Lord of the Flies in space. I bet they will think it is soooooo funny when they find out it is just a TV show.

    1. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the last episode is where they try to join the 100 Mile High club, only to find out that it's actually just 100mm.

    2. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer.

    3. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by hobbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And then... the final twist.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer.

      Gods, I hope so. If they're really pulling this sort of "prank", I hope the producers get sued for every penny. No, scratch thatt - I hope they get sued and then criminally prosecuted for fraud.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      And you're of course laboring under the impression that the UK legal system works just as the US one.

      Gosh, weren't the Brits the ones that managed to prove that the "car vs. taxi" myth is real when Mythbusters miserably failed due to overly zealous legal contentions imposed by the insurance company?

      Contrary from Americans, people in the UK (IMHO) would actually appreciate if everything turned out to be an ellaborate lie to the viewer instead of dedicating time, resources and effort to flood Channel 4 with stupid lawsuits tailored to scrape every penny from them.

    6. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by nietsch · · Score: 1

      hmm, final episode, only 3 left, 2 spacesuits and 1 winner. I bet the winner will not wear a spacesuit.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    7. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not sure about that. I'd spotted the guy in the Give Blood ad too - they're still showing it fer crying out loud - but remember that on previous Big Brothers several contestants were registered as actors/models while eking out an existence in a real job until someone 'recognized their talent'.

      The kind of people who apply for Endemol shows are desperate for the oxygen of publicity. This isn't going to be the only show they've tried to get on. eg: this bloke won 'Playing it Straight' on Ch4 and also won 'Britains worst builder' on Ch5. Crap ctor? Crap model? Crap builder? Probably all three; not a confidence trick by the producers but a fame-grab by the contestant.

      The whole fakery of this bullshit taken to a new level by E4's Bamboozle - a gameshow where the point is to get yourself on other telly shows as much as possible.

    8. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      You are thinking the US legal system is as messed up as everyone says it is on Slashdot. It isn't that bad.

      Ever see Joe Schmoe 1 & 2? My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiance? Plus at least one "Idol/Pop Star" knockoff where they only picked the worst singers (I forget the name). All were reality shows, where the "guests" are the butt of the joke. And there have been others. The US didn't invent the "reality show" but we pioneered and have already done half a dozen shows where the joke is on the "star".

      Don't expect any lawsuits in the UK or US. Anyone who thinks we have invented "gravity plating" deserves to be the butt of the joke. These guys have no clue as to what is going on re: space in the real world. Definately not nerds.

      The 400k and 1mb live feeds for free (reg required and occasional RAF commercials) are pretty damn cool. Can't wait for find some bittorrents of the actual show. Links anyone?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many of the reality shows in the US are packed with professional actors, but not because they are actors. They are there because they have the time and willingness to be on the show. They want to be actors, but are just participants in the show. Many careers have been launched from success in reality shows, so lots of actors are trying to get on them as participants.

    10. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 1
      There is a reasonable tradition of spoof shows on UK telly. One, back in the 70s called Alternative Three was a fake investigative documentary. It purported to expose top secret manned missions to Mars, which discovered advanced lifeforms there. Another is Ghostwatch (Google it, 'cos there is only so much trauma I can take).

      Taking it the next step and faking an entire 'reality' show has a certain attraction, I suppose - except that it isn't really that well done. It just feels horribly scripted to me (something the other two I mention largely avoided).

      Of course, I might be wrong....

    11. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by ungerware · · Score: 2

      Except that, according to that article, the actor was listed as an "electrician".

      --

      -----
      Kvetch is Yiddish for "throw an exception" --Dr. Ron Cytron
    12. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      I was talking with a co-worker about this yesterday who's been watching the show. Apparently, not only did they test for gullibility, but they tested for good-naturedness. (Or at least ability to take being mocked and put in embarrassing situations.)

    13. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Keri said the best thing about being in orbit had been, "Last night, seeing planet Earth, it was absolutely amazing."

      Keri had been concerned to see debris falling from the earth. "I thought it was space junk but Drew said it was ice."


      It has to be a hoax. I haven't heard anything about a "Global Dropping Of Ice Chunks" problem.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    14. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not all aspiring actors and actresses serve food.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    15. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by bani · · Score: 1

      Gosh, weren't the Brits the ones that managed to prove that the "car vs. taxi" myth is real when Mythbusters miserably failed due to overly zealous legal contentions imposed by the insurance company?

      It was limitations imposed by the networks' insurance company, in this case the australian network which produces mythbusters. In case you forget, mythbusters is an australian production, not an american one.

      In any case, the mythbusters already stated the myth was true even though they were unable to reproduce it.

    16. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Sue for what? And who would sue, you? You don't have grounds to sue for anything. Fraud? Who was defrauded? Do you complain when your favorite team loses a game, even though you weren't playing?

    17. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by ezberry · · Score: 1

      In some senses, that's true, but England has is a far more plaintiff-friendly nation for libel (click)
      Ali G (Sasha Cohen), for example may ACTUALLY be at risk for libel if Kazakhstan can obtain jurisdiction over him in England.

    18. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Just the fact that they would do that implies that it is a hoax. I am pretty sure forcing people to believe they will die is, by definition, torture.

      --
      I do security
    19. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      It's actually pretty common for no name actors and actresses to try and get jobs on reality tv shows. Sure, it's often a career killer, but those guys would do anything to get seen. I don't think that's the punchline of the show.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    20. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I was thinking this last week as being the ultimate twist in the show.

      Everyone is waiting for the confrontation when the "fools" get shown how they got duped, only for the producers to show some highlights which show various clues that it was all a load of bollocks.

      The fact that there are 2 actors out of this bunch, and there are 3 actor "plants" is very suspicious to me.

    21. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The US didn't invent the "reality show"

      No? Where was it invented, then?

      The first "reality show" was An American Family, on PBS in 1973. However, the modern crop of reality programs are all descended somehow from MTV's The Real World, of 1992.

      And of course, the specific hoax-oriented style to which you refer was pioneered by Candid Camera, again from the USA.

    22. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      of course it is a hoax -- the f-ing site says so

      Channel 4 is blasting a group of adventurers, ordinary members of the public, off into space to spend five days orbiting the earth. It's thrilling, it's exciting, and it's totally bogus.

      In fact, the cadets will be on a disused military base in Suffolk.

      Our group of thrill seekers will experience two weeks of intensive astronaut training believing they are in Star City, near Moscow, and labouring under the illusion that they are part of a real space mission.


      but is it a hoax of a hoax? Are these astronauts really fooled, or are they in on it and merely acting?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    23. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >In case you forget, mythbusters is an australian production, not an american one.

      With location in San Francisco -- how odd, I had no idea

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    24. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1
      Quoth Pharmboy
      Don't expect any lawsuits in the UK or US.
      Google "There's something about Miriam", I'm pretty sure the producers of that reality show in the UK were sued.
    25. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by greylouser · · Score: 1
      You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer.

      Wait til I get going!

      The science is so moronic that it can clearly not be a hoax on the participants. But the premise that someone would fall for it is so foolish that it can clearly not be hoax on the viewers! But the show is produced in the UK, and only Doctor Who fans come from the UK! Doctor Who fans are knowledgeable about science, so it can clearly not be a hoax on the participants! But Doctor Who is ALSO known for reversing the polarity as an explanation for time travel, so it can clearly not be a hoax on the viewers!

      [Greylouser falls over dead]

    26. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by _pruegel_ · · Score: 1

      Many careers have been launched from success in reality shows Do you mind naming a few of those? In Germany only C and D class actors appear in reality shows and none of them managed to (re-) launch anything similar to a career.

    27. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by jshackney · · Score: 1
      You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer.


      Reality television is a hoax on the viewer.
    28. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      people in the UK (IMHO) would actually appreciate if everything turned out to be an ellaborate lie to the viewer

      I wasn't clear. I hope it is a lie to the viewer; if it is as it claims, it is an cruel act of fraud on the victims who beleive they are going into space. If it's a lie to the viewer. it's merely stupid.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    29. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Reality shows also have writers.

    30. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      You don't have grounds to sue for anything. Fraud? Who was defrauded?

      My post was unclear. Apologies. If the show is what it claims, the "contestants" have been defrauded. If the whole thing is a put-on on the viewing audience, then it's merely stupid.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    31. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      And some of the scenes shot from multiple cameras look set-up or staged.
      Hmmm. . .

    32. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Altus · · Score: 1



      I just dont see the angle for this to be a hoax on the audience... I mean, people like watching other people get fooled and act like idiots... they do not like to be fooled them selves... and in the end... how are you really fooling them... I mean, "We hired a bunch of actors to act like they are incredibly stupid and gullible and you believe that they actually were stupid and gullible wile watching our edited TV broadcast" isn't exactly an impressive piece of work...

      now if you actually convinced the audience that the people were in space at least you would be really fooling them... hiring actors to act like morons only to fool people into believing that they are morons isnt going to attract viewers... might work the first time (because nobody knows) but you can forget about a sequel.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    33. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. I would think that's also the strongest argument for this thing being a hoax upon the audience. All of the contestants could have been pursuing their normal lives or careers and would have been, essentially, tricked into captivity.

    34. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer.

      And you on the otherhand are getting all superior on us on the basis of..... some random website! ;)

    35. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did deserve it though! Seriously. I mean, okay, people who apply to be on TV shows might expect to be made to look a little silly, but this was in a completely different league.
      Funny concept... but it should've stayed as just a concept.

    36. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by tsangc · · Score: 1
      Many of the reality shows in the US are packed with professional actors, but not because they are actors.

      Could someone explain to me why so many folks on reality shows are in "Pharmaceutical Sales"? I swear, every Survivor, Big Brother etc season seems to have at least one.

      For example:

      http://www.cbs.com/primetime/survivor11/survivors/ bio_stephenie.shtml

      or

      http://www.cbs.com/primetime/survivor7/survivors/b io/tijuana.shtml

      or

      http://www.realitytvmagazine.com/blog/2005/07/apri l_lewis_a_p.html

    37. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by EddWo · · Score: 1
      Cheerleaders, they were all cheerleaders at college. The drug companies recruit cheerleaders as sales reps, see Like, you should totally prescribe this drug!

      I guess former Cheerleaders all have the sort of mindset that attracts them to sign up for reality TV, attention seeking, aspiring actresses etc.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    38. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Sirch · · Score: 1

      Oddly, Ryan McBride is from Glasgow... as is Gordon Ramsay, the TV chef in the top left of the picture. I spotted the guy in the ad, and did wonder, but Ryan's pointed out as the guy who saved him from a ruptured spleen by giving blood.

      Could it be that this is just coincidence and that the ad is real? In other words, the guy gave blood in Glasgow and Mr. Ramsay got it? It would make sense...

    39. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      True. Some work at McDonalds.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      ...But Doctor Who is ALSO known for reversing the polarity as an explanation for time travel, so it can clearly not be a hoax on the viewers!

      Yes, but he's got a sonic screwdriver. I've got all the security torx bits, but I've never encountered a sonic bit.

    41. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      of course it is a hoax -- the f-ing site says so

      Incredibly perceptive.

      I was replying to "You are of course labouring under the illusion that the whole thing isn't a hoax on the viewer."

      Slow down on the POST COMMENT trigger there cowboy.

      It's obvious that I was agreeing with the parent post.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    42. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

      Well, if we assume for a moment that it isn't a hoax. It wouldn't be real funny if two of them decided to murder the third so that they can get the suits....

      Even if the show staff came rushing in to save him/her, it would still be conspiracy to commit murder.

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    43. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      True; Harrison Ford was a carpenter before American Graffiti and Star Wars.

    44. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      In libel cases it's only the lawyers that ever win.

    45. Re:Dramatic Final Episode by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      well, I humbly apologize if I misread your post and replied inappropriately

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  3. Big Brother Space Edition... by matr0x_x · · Score: 3, Funny

    So how long before other reality TV shows start happening in space? I can see it now, people being voted off the space station every week...

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
    1. Re:Big Brother Space Edition... by MROD · · Score: 1

      It's a pity that the name "Spaced" has been already taken for a TV show in that case.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    2. Re:Big Brother Space Edition... by Nightspark · · Score: 1

      I think an actual "reality" show involving outer space could be interesting if done right. Not like they'd be allowed on the ISS, but make them fight to be on a SpaceShipTwo, or even just make them do challenges on a parabolic flight.

    3. Re:Big Brother Space Edition... by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Somebody missed the season finale of Doctor Who (2-parter) where there was literally a Big Brother set in space. (FWIW, there was also a Weakest Link in space.)

    4. Re:Big Brother Space Edition... by Dom2 · · Score: 1
      The thing that made me laugh in that was the Anne-Droid. 'ar 'ar! You can't go wrong with a bad pun.

      -Dom

  4. ha! by Beatbyte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Finally proof they're just as stoopid as us Americanos :D

    1. Re:ha! by dfn5 · · Score: 1
      Finally proof they're just as stoopid as us Americanos :D

      Its Britain, not Mexico. Therefore, they're just as stoopid as us Yanks.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    2. Re:ha! by errxn · · Score: 1

      ...just as stoopid as us Americanos :D

      How's THAT for a self-evident statement?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    3. Re:ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of sarcasm?

  5. Wightlessnes? by bamf · · Score: 1

    I suppose space is quite a long way from the Isle of Wight :)

    1. Re:Wightlessnes? by jeblucas · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...if it's not too dear.

      --
      blarg.
    2. Re:Wightlessnes? by beebware · · Score: 1

      We can scrimp and save!

  6. "reality" TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    so remind me why it's called that, again? Because it's "real"?

    1. Re:"reality" TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because in reality people are stupid

  7. Sounds like a blast! by RileyLewis · · Score: 0, Funny

    For once, a reality show sounds like a blast! I hope it rockets right up to the top of the ratings!

  8. Just wait by enrac · · Score: 1

    till they ask to look out the windows

    1. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they are planning to let them look out the windows, but they couldn't open the window visors because there was a moth flying around on the set they had created.

    2. Re:Just wait by swilde23 · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the about page
      When the cadets look out of the cockpit window, they'll see a distant earth, thanks to meticulous visual effects.
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    3. Re:Just wait by orion41us · · Score: 1

      Until the blue screen of death pops up on the projector, wonder what they will tell them? "Well it apears that the windows have locked up?"

    4. Re:Just wait by cortana · · Score: 1

      I saw an episode of this yesterday. They haven't let the contestants near the window yet because a moth is loose in the studio and they don't want to risk it interposing itself between a contestant and the image of the earth.

    5. Re:Just wait by jilopez · · Score: 1

      Read the profiles on the site, they could be running Celestia on a 14" CRT for all they'd know.

      Paul describes himself as a happy-go-lucky charmer who has a good sense of humour and enjoys a wind up either at his or others' expense. He doesn't like heights, deep water or ghosts.

    6. Re:Just wait by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1
      > When the cadets look out of the cockpit window, they'll see a distant earth, thanks to meticulous visual effects.

      But...but...but the article says they were told the reason for experiencing gravity is that they are in low orbit.

      On the other hand ... Here I am, wasting time trying to squeeze logic out of a television show that starts from a premise of non-logic.

      Sigh.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    7. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tell them it's a Space Moth. They believe in gravity generators, I'm sure they'll have no trouble believing in that.

  9. To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...had to fail a drug test, physics test, and IQ test.

    1. Re:To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention take science classes in Kansas...

    2. Re:To qualify, participants... by frostilicus2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact, they did. The "astronauts" were selected on the basis of their suggestibility and ignorance of physics, space and Russia. The extent of which is quite astounding - they are told that they are "too close to earth" to experience any weightlessness. Which has interesting implications for the fate of their shuttle...

      Here are the deeply patronising contestant profiles from the Channel Four web site:

      Andrew is a student who lives at home with his parents. He's good looking and confident, and describes himself as funny, intelligent, charming and considerate. One of his luckiest moments was going out with the prettiest girl in his primary school.
      Andrew finds the R Kelly track 'I Believe I Can Fly' inspirational because it gives him self-belief and makes him feel he can do anything.
      He is a keen Arsenal fan and plays football in a local league - but that's not his only interest: he also confesses to being a church attendee but sadly he only mimes the words to the hymns, as he doesn't know the words.
      Andrew is also scared of moths.

      Astrid is looking for some real excitement in her life. She's a pretty blonde from Mid Glamorgan, who went to school in Cardiff with pop chick Charlotte Church. She now lives in the sticks, so can't hit the town every night.
      Astrid works in a call centre, and has had five different jobs this year but still doesn't know what she wants to do. In fact, she wants to do everything! She's also quite clumsy and has a habit of losing mobile phones. Like her old school chum Charlotte, she also likes to sing, but suffers from stagefright and can only perform in front of her family.
      Astrid's had a boyfriend for the last 6 months and claims she has lots of friends. She's an adventurous girl who dreams of riding in a Formula 1 car. She gets annoyed by two-faced people and hates seeing others being picked on.

      Billy is one for the ladies. He is a semi-pro footballer and his ultimate ambition is a to be a footballer or film star. He realises he's too old for professional football but there is still time to hit Hollywood. He describes himself as tall, dark and handsome, funny, outgoing, polite and caring but also one of the lads.
      Billy loves the film Armageddon, hates spiders and the idea of drowning and says his most embarrassing moment was when his ex girlfriend's dad witnessed him walking down the catwalk in a red silk thong. He believes in reincarnation and wants to return as a golden eagle. Billy does not believe in ghosts but claims to have seen an alien.

      Cheryl is a lively, ambitious and opinionated girl who loves people. She is also impatient and hates being alone. A firm believer in fate, she believes in reincarnation and ghosts - she says a guardian angel visited her when she was aged sixteen. She fears drowning and fire but feels that taking part in a 'thrill-seekers' show will give her the chance to do something unique.
      Cheryl describes herself as a typical, up-for-it 23 year old girl. She hates liars and smoking, and enjoys clubbing with her friends, clothes and relaxing in a bath with a glass of wine.

      Keri's so keen on space travel that her ultimate fancy dress outfit is dressing up as an astronaut. She describes herself as a friendly, outgoing girl who will try anything once, and compares herself to Bridget Jones. She's also a team player - as long as the team wins! Her fears include drowning and spiders, and she never, ever wants to free-fall into water or sing in front of a group of people.
      Keri's strangest job was dressing up as a human eyeball to promote Specsavers. Other unusual achievements include being able to put her fist in her mouth.
      Things Keri likes include Christmas, white-knuckle rides, family, friends, holidays, romance and chocolate.

      Louise is sporty and competitive and represents her county in basketball and athletics. She lived in Canada for ten months, and admits to being afraid of

      --
      Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
    3. Re:To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, GWB will be playing in the American version?

    4. Re:To qualify, participants... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      In space, no one can hear you shake your head in dismay......

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    5. Re:To qualify, participants... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      He did...and we lost.

    6. Re:To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how they would describe the presenter of the show, Johnny Vaughn?

      They would have to include the fact that he once tried to sell a largish quantity of cocaine to some undercover cops at a service station and did a fair old stretch in prison! Look it up, its a fact.

      So who's the silly mug?

      Surely I'm not the only one who must be hoping that he was on the receiving end of a most horrible and haunting violation while he was serving out his sentence.

    7. Re:To qualify, participants... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      He is a keen Arsenal fan and plays football in a local league

      OT, I've always thought Arsenal was a strange name for a team. Ignoring completely the pun of the first four letters, an arsenal is a completely inanimate object.. really nothing more than a bunch of potential energy waiting for someone or something else to help it realize its potential. Almost as bad as BASF's commercial. "We don't make anything."

    8. Re:To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you fail an IQ test?

    9. Re:To qualify, participants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's because the club was originally started by workers from the Woolwich Arsenal (as in the place guns were manufactured), and also named 'Woolwich Arsenal FC', but when they moved to a new ground in Highbury (which is the other side of London to Woolwich), they dropped the first bit of their name.

    10. Re:To qualify, participants... by lkcl · · Score: 1

      whatwhatwhat? are you talking about the requirements for politicians?

  10. gravity generators? by at_18 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...gravity generators

    Sure proof that those onboard deserve to be laughed at, assuming that they aren't paid actors.

    1. Re:gravity generators? by tocs · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... Reality Shows

      The viewing public deserves to be laughed at...

    2. Re:gravity generators? by n3k5 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sure proof that those onboard deserve to be laughed at, assuming that they aren't paid actors.
      Some of them are, in order to make the scam more believable for the rest. Which where not explicitly cast for their stupidity by the way, but, as you'd expect, for their boundless gullibility. Of course, people who have the slightest comprehension of physics were also ruled out. The production team also interviewed family members or close friends to rule out people who are likely to be exceedingly pissed when they find out the truth. So the victims are actually treated much better than those in a show that plays pranks on random people who aren't even aware of the cameras. Of course, what all of this means is: yes indeed, they absolutely deserve to be laughed at.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    3. Re:gravity generators? by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      assuming that they aren't paid actors

      Good, good. You're beginning to get the picture...

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    4. Re:gravity generators? by harpep · · Score: 1

      Don't know what the question is. Our artificial gravity generators, while noisy at times, seem to be functioning well.

      Oh, and I'll be jumping into my time machine now so I'll be the first one to post on this...

    5. Re:gravity generators? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Sure proof that those onboard deserve to be laughed at, assuming that they aren't paid actors.

      Oh, bullshit. Ignorance of physics is sad reflection of the state of science education, not something that a person deserves to be humiliated about.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:gravity generators? by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Actually I have an under-floor gravity generator right here. The producers are lying.

    7. Re:gravity generators? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      No, not some of them being actors...

      ALL of them.

      This is irreality television, staged for your pleasure. Part of the fun is that the audience cannot know that they are being duped, not the cast. It's like a post-modern reality show, the rolls have been switched.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    8. Re:gravity generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be funny if the joke was really on the actors, and they really were in space.

    9. Re:gravity generators? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While stupidity and gullibility are not technically the same thing, they might as well be. Science is based on a lack of gullibility - the determination to separate fact from fiction, truth from bullshit...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. under-floor gravity generators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care about the rest, I want details about this little imaginary piece of machinery.

    1. Re:under-floor gravity generators by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      The "astronaut candidates" were briefed on this by the programme's chief special effects guy posing as an astrophysicist and spacecraft engineer. By this point everyone had already established that these hapless inmates were lacking a clue or two, and the lecturer had no trouble in running the whole antigrav thing by them with a mixture of mumbling and hand-waving and hiding behind a rather unkempt beard.

      There was in that performance a remarkable resemblance to one or two of my biochemistry professors at university back in the day so it was entirely convincing.

  12. Hmm by idonthack · · Score: 1

    No windows I guess?

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    1. Re:Hmm by j-cloth · · Score: 3, Funny

      nope. the simulator runs Solaris.

  13. Retards in space. by cttforsale · · Score: 2, Funny

    and the public laps it up...

    1. Re:Retards in space. by bprime · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a slashdot section for that?

  14. Some Quotes From the Site by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So they're setting these people up to be made idiots in front of entire nations of television watchers.

    At first I was disgusted from the initial appearance of this show, and unfortunately after a few quotes from the profiles such as these:
    Andrew is also scared of moths.
    Astrid's had a boyfriend for the last 6 months and claims she has lots of friends. She's an adventurous girl who dreams of riding in a Formula 1 car.
    He believes in reincarnation and wants to return as a golden eagle. Billy does not believe in ghosts but claims to have seen an alien.
    Keri's strangest job was dressing up as a human eyeball to promote Specsavers. Other unusual achievements include being able to put her fist in her mouth.
    Ryan is happiest when he has no responsibility, but he has big plans for the future - so watch out world!
    I realize that this will probably be an instant success. It appears to be on a UK channel but I'm guessing it will be picked up and aired in the states.

    I guess when you put people like this together, you have a formula for an instant TV hit (like every reality show before it). Am I allowed to hate this show if it's making light of the people I dislike the most in this world?

    If you disagree that it's going to be a hit, check out the 9 pages of posts on its bulletin boards.

    Also to note, there are posts on the bulletin that this may be a hoax on the viewing public. Just relaying that speculation.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Keri's strangest job was dressing up as a human eyeball to promote Specsavers. Other unusual achievements include being able to put her fist in her mouth.

      Sounds like my kind of girl!

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    2. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by cttforsale · · Score: 1

      It will have to be over-dubbed or sub-titled...

    3. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by chowells · · Score: 1

      Or all they all actors, making a fool out of the viewing public?

    4. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Andrew is also scared of moths.

      Am I allowed to hate this show if it's making light of the people I dislike the most in this world?

      What's wrong with being scared of moths? If Andrew's irrational views were getting people killed (eg. he was scared of Muslims and wanted his country's military to kill them) then I could see disliking him but if being scared of moths is the one thing that gives meaning to his otherwise pointless and miserable existance then why dislike him for it.

    5. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by DarkIye · · Score: 0
      This might be a hit, but it'll have problems with longevity. The difference between this and, say, Big Brother, is that this isn't going to have 5 more maddening, accursed series (more or less by definition), one after another, with which my otherwise normal friends and colleagues will regale me with in extensive and frankly disgusting detail on Monday morning.

      But hey, you know, there are some pretty stupid people in the world. Most of which are already, thankfully, dead.

    6. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Also to note, there are posts on the bulletin that this may be a hoax on the viewing public. Just relaying that speculation.

      But we already know they're not really going into space, that's the whole premise of the programme. I don't think it counts as a hoax if the potential victim already knows it's fake.

    7. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      Read the post I linked. It suggests that the people on the show are all actors and are faking their innocence. Sounds like a hoax on the viewers not the participants.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    8. Re:Some Quotes From the Site by drsquare · · Score: 1

      But if we know it's all fake anyway then how's it a hoax? Finding out that people we thought we real were really actors would be the weakest, most boring hoax in history.

  15. For safety's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they brought an inanimate carbon rod.

    1. Re:For safety's sake... by mukund · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new stupid overlords...

      --
      Banu
    2. Re:For safety's sake... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      New?
      The ruling classes have always been the most stupid.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    3. Re:For safety's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In rod we trust.

    4. Re:For safety's sake... by fbartho · · Score: 1

      Sheeit... I for one don't welcome them!

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    5. Re:For safety's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck does the parent post get a "troll" rating ?

    6. Re:For safety's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a conspiracy of the unbelievers to suppress the gospel of the ICR!

  16. the producers believe the players think this? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The lesson here is the same one as in the U.S. with Jay Leno's Tonight Show: You get to be on TV if you can act like you are really stupid.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:the producers believe the players think this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get to be on TV if you can act like you are really stupid.

      They aren't acting.

    2. Re:the producers believe the players think this? by Greatmoose · · Score: 1

      The fact they're NOT acting makes me weep at night...

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    3. Re:the producers believe the players think this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The lesson here is the same one as in the U.S. with Jay Leno's Tonight Show: You get to be on TV if you can act like you are really stupid.

      Jay Leno isn't just acting stupid.
    4. Re:the producers believe the players think this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. The real lesson behind the Tonight Show is that you can get on tv and have high ratings if you can be unfunny and act like you are funny. JAY LENO IS NOT FUNNY PEOPLE!

  17. View out the windows by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I read (can't remember exactly where) that they were putting super high definition screens in the windows to play bogus orbital footage. Supposedly the screens are equivalent to what are used for movie effects production.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:View out the windows by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense at all. If they moved their heads they would be able to tell that what they were seeing was immediately outside the window.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:View out the windows by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      Just tell them that in addition to the artificial gravity generators installed the floor they also have parallax stabilizers installed in the windows. If that doesn't convince 'em, throw in something about tachyons. Hey, it worked for "Star Trek"!

    3. Re:View out the windows by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Well, these people believe in "gravity generators" so I doubt they are very observant. Also, the screens would fill the window and show a moving scene that portrayed something so far away that you wouldn't have any apparent parallax in real life either. I'm sure the windows are small portholes anyway.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:View out the windows by Gratch42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What'd be really funny is the computer that they run the "window visual simulation" on get's a BSOD and one of the people sees it.

    5. Re:View out the windows by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Why not just say the thing is rotating about an axis, which would be in effect, a gravity generator.

    6. Re:View out the windows by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. I'm not talking about paralax allowing you to tell that one star is closer than the moon or the earth or something. You couldn't see that in real life either. I'm saying that if there was a screen displaying a star field in real life, you could move your head and you'd see a different section of the star field. In order for the illusion to work, the screen would have to be very large and far from the porthole.

      Parallax would certainly tell you if the stars were right outside the window.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:View out the windows by boxy50 · · Score: 1

      Answer: They weren't allowed to go right up to the window, they were kept a few feet away, which would limit the paralax effect quite a bit..

    8. Re:View out the windows by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          In concept, it's good. Unfortunately, it wouldn't fit on the shuttle. To make 1G, it would need to be making hard loops all the time, and burning up a lot of fuel in the process. Rotating around any of it's own axis would make different degrees of gravity throughout the craft, and probably make you nauseous. A ring shaped area, like portrayed in many movies, would provide the 1G, but the floor would always be curved.

          I guess it would be harder to fool the general public into believing that these kids believed they were being sent up on a new spaceship. Going up on a good ol' workhorse is more believable. Well, kinda. Not really though. Ok, people who believe the actors on the show actually believe what they're doing are the fools here. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:View out the windows by burndive · · Score: 1

      The easy way to counter this would be to put a lens on the porthole.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    10. Re:View out the windows by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that something as heavy as a rapidly spinning cabin would act as a giant gyroscope and make it even harder (use up precious fuel) to adjust the vehicle against the axis of rotation.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    11. Re:View out the windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the screens are half-spheres to encase the windows so there are no "dead spots"

    12. Re:View out the windows by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV, but a good way to tell if this really is a hoax on the audience would be to wait for some decent footage of the windows. If it has parallax and looks real, then the series is probably being shot on a green-screen set, and the pretend cadets are just pretending to see something through the pretend windows.

      IMO if they are using display screens, it will be glaringly obvious to television viewers when they're shown at anything like close range.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    13. Re:View out the windows by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          Just think, if you made the shuttle come to a quick stop, the counterweight would be like a big yoyo. That may hurt when it slaps into the cargo bay.. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:View out the windows by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i beleive its possible to design projection systems such that the projected image appears to be at infinity

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, if you are in orbit, you would experience weightlessness nomatter how far you are above the earth.

  19. *sigh* gravity generators by luvirini · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seems indeed that many people are stupid.. if we could manipulate gravity.. would not likely need rocket engines..

    not to mention the fact that a TV show would not be first one to have them for real.. :)

    1. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      You, sir, can leave the building! Please don't talk to any other "astronauts" on your way out.

      --The Administration.

    2. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by hobbit · · Score: 1


      A rocket engine is a gravity manipulation device.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    3. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by luvirini · · Score: 1

      No it is not. It counters the effects of force of gravity with opposite force, as do many other effects like aerodynamic lift and so on.. but no.. they do not change gravity at all.

    4. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > A rocket engine is a gravity manipulation device.
      >
      >No it is not. It counters the effects of force of gravity with opposite force, as do many other effects like aerodynamic lift and so on.. but no.. they do not change gravity at all.

      Actually, it is. As long as the windows are closed, you can't immediately tell the difference between 1g acceleration due to gravity, or 1g acceleration due to a rocket.

      "The reason you're not feeling weightlessness is because the antimatter drive is accelerating you away from Earth at 9.8 meters per second per second. The reason the windows show nothing but a static starfield is because five days at 1g acceleration isn't anywhere long enough to get to relativistic velocity."

      (If, by seasons 2 and 3 of the show, I started to notice a visible barrel distortion around the viewscreens as we got into the neighborhood of .99c range, I might even be fooled myself :-)

    5. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Duh! We're in the early stages of development. Right now we can only *add* gravity. Reducing gravity is the next (ahem) logical step. ;-)

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    6. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by hobbit · · Score: 1


      What you say is true; yet a spacerocket does also manipulate gravity, as it alters the amount of gravitional attraction exerted by the earth on the rocket and vice versa... requiring chemical energy to be converted into force to do so.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    7. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Seems indeed that many people are stupid.. if we could manipulate gravity.. would not likely need rocket engines..

      That is correct - in fact it's a principle part of the theory of relativity. To an inside observer with no knowledge of what's happening outside of his frame of reference, gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.

      So, from a pure macro physics standpoint, yes a machine that can maniuplate gravity would also be a reactionless thruster.

      But there is an idea for an antigravity device that would violate this principle; that of a graviton-absorbing (or deflecting) material.

      But, then, that's an entirely different idea; nullifying a gravity field as opposed to creating one. Chances are, if you can create one, you can do whatever you want... inertial dampeners, reactionless thrusters, if you're lucky even instant wormholes and warp drive.

      For those curious, there is a real theory behind warp drive... it doesn't work quite the same way as on star trek... but the basic idea is to compress space as you move through it, so that you never violate speed of light constraints, but can still move at apparent velocities several times the speed of light... this idea would, of course, require the ability to build quite sophisticated gravity fields. In fact, in the case of warp drive, far more sophisticated than those required to just hold feet to a floor...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    8. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      As a practical matter, it is true that accelleration is the same as gravity.

      Note however that a gravity source (i.e. planet, star or moon) is a point source.

      Acceleration of the rocket is a vector toward a plane.

      So theoretically, one could tell the difference if the direction of accelleration could be measured with enough accuracy. A planet would produce vectors that are off of parallel (converging) a little bit (even diverging, gravity pull is not constant on the Earth's surface).

      A rocket acceleration detector in two places in the rocket would give absolutely parallel readings. A the same two detectors on a planet would probably produce non-parallel readings.

      Assuming the rocket is a perfect accelerator and it has a perfect guidance system.... etc.

      Issac Newton did the point-source problem early in the history of calculus, so it's not a hard problem as far as the math goes.

      That's not to say the fundamental point gravity = acceleration isn't true, just that the assertion that you can't tell under experimental conditions of a rocket or elevator and a planet is not true.

    9. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by hobbit · · Score: 1

      For those curious, there is a real theory behind warp drive... it doesn't work quite the same way as on star trek... but the basic idea is to compress space as you move through it, so that you never violate speed of light constraints, but can still move at apparent velocities several times the speed of light... this idea would, of course, require the ability to build quite sophisticated gravity fields. In fact, in the case of warp drive, far more sophisticated than those required to just hold feet to a floor...
      And if anyone doubts we'll ever be able to build such gravity fields... remember that the only power source capable of generating one point twenty-one gigawatts of electricity is a bolt of lightning!

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    10. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by ChrisTaylor2904 · · Score: 1
      Given sensitive enough instruments or a large enough "spaceship", you can tell the difference, because of the inverse square law.

      Anything massive enough to generate 1g of gravitational force will generate a different field strength over the volume of the spaceship - the acceleration would be slightly lower than 1g at the point furthest from the centre of mass, and higher than 1g at the point closest to the centre of mass. A spaceship of width 20m orbiting the earth at 500 km height, say, would only have about a 1 in 10000 difference between nearest and furthest, though.

      If you're accelerating using a rocket drive, the acceleration would be uniform over the whole volume of the ship. That's assuming, of course, the rocket's acceleration could be kept at exactly 1g, which, again, depends on how sensitive your instruments are.

    11. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean jiggawatts

      I mean WTF is a gigawatt?

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    12. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by lgw · · Score: 1
      Hang a weight from each of two lines. Measure carefully:
      • Parallel: rocket ship
      • Closer at the bottom: gravity
      • Closer at the top: you're spinning
      Of course, practially, the difference is too small to measure except in extreme examples.
      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by hobbit · · Score: 1


      Have you never ordered a gin and tonic from a giraffe (if you get my gist)?

      Gigawatt / gigabyte / gigaflop comes from the same root as giant / gigantic. Do you say "guy-gantic"?

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    14. Re:*sigh* gravity generators by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this interview (can't dig up a link, sorry) where a journalist asks one of the Star Trek script writers just how the gravity generators actually work. The reply was, I believe, the only sensible answer possible:

      "Very well, thank you."

  20. yeat another oxymoron by plopez · · Score: 2

    Reality television. 'nuff said...

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  21. Heavy, man! by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 5, Funny

    "They aren't experiencing weightlessnes due to ... a few under-floor gravity generators." - "gravity generators" like, for instance, the EARTH?

    1. Re:Heavy, man! by MROD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, everyone knows that Star Trek is real and that all space ships and space stations have gravity plating under the desk plating. It must be true, it's on the telly!

      Of course this will mean that to survive the contestants will have to use the ParticleOfTheWeek to thwart the danger. eg. The quantum bozo-on emissions will need to be deflected using the primary communication array, or somesuch.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    2. Re:Heavy, man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFLMAO
      I'm out of mod-points today, other wise I'd give ya one. Thanks for the laugh.

    3. Re:Heavy, man! by po8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That, and of course they were wearing the famous heavy boots.

    4. Re:Heavy, man! by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Yes, we have all viewed the Historical Documents... (by Grapnar's Hammer! ;)

  22. Why do you doubt us?? by OctoberSky · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...rather than outer space where the wightlessnes is"

    News for Nerds? I think you can safely assume that the Slashdot crowd understand where wightlessness occurs.

    1. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      Certainly not on the Isle of Wight, that's for sure!

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    2. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      Where weightlessness occurs? I don't know how high typical orbits tend to be for man-made vessels, but the force due to Earth's gravity is not 0. It's why weightlessness occurs (because in orbit you are in a constant freefall, so you, all your internal organs, and the floor beneath you are not exerting any normal forces on each other), not whereit occurs.

      As suggested, I don't know nor do I car to look up how high typical orbits are, so I dont' know how small-to-negligeable the force of gravity frmo earth is, but it would be incorrect to say astronauts experience weightlessness bcause of where they are alone. Keep the vessel stationary but still in outer space and there will still be some gravity giving them weight.

    3. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      And I have fallen prey to my horrific typing that has caused me to unknowingly ignore any and all typos, replacing what i have read in my mind with what I interpretted as the intended meaning.

      I really should do something about that.

    4. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      At the altitudes most spacecraft orbit at, the gravity loss due to distance is negligible. Gravitational acceleration may be 9.80m/s/s instead of 9.81m/s/s, if the diffrence is even that large. Almost all of the weightless effect comes from freefall in LEO.

    5. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Also, I should point out that there really isn't anyplace humans are capable of going where gravity is not a major factor. Even if we leave Earth's "Sphere of Influence", we are then in the suns, which is even more powerful. Earth, with us on it, is hurtling around the sun at nearly 30km/s (relative to the sun), compared to the 7.8km/s (relative to earth) of an object in LEO. The weaker the gravity, the slower the orbital velocity at a givin distance, and the velocity slows the farther away you go. Objects in LEO are only 300-400km away from earth, while we are 1 AU (149598000km) away from Sol. Makes earth seem rather puny and insignificant. ;)

      And of course, Sol is orbiting the galaxy, and the galaxy is falling toward a galaxy cluster....

    6. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      In the vicinity of a level 14+ cleric?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:Why do you doubt us?? by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying that. I figured as much but I wasn't sure and didn't want to assume.

  23. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by MROD · · Score: 1

    I imagine that part of the selection process included an IQ test with only those without GCSE's and an IQ below 50 allowed to take part. Otherwise the contestants might be able to work out that it was a hoax.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  24. The brilliant thing is.. by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

    It shows just how gullible people can be.

    For example, in order to explain why when they go into space yet experience gravity and no above normal g-force on take off. They were given a talk on the "artificial gravity generators" which give the shuttle an artificial gravity, despite breaking the laws of physics.

    The amazing thing is they not only bought that up but everything else, it shows just how gullible (and poorly educated, guess it says lots about the education system) people are.

    1. Re:The brilliant thing is.. by DarkIye · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't blame it on the education system. I'm still halfway through it, in fact, and I was never in any doubt - even before I entered it - that there was no way of 'turning on' gravity, just like that. You actually learn quite early on how mass 'causes' a gravitational field, perhaps not very much more than that.

      I don't think you'd like it if I took, say, a sample of Americans from a Darwin Awards website and said it 'says a lot about the education system'.

    2. Re:The brilliant thing is.. by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      despite breaking the laws of physics.

      Cue one of my favorite Roadrunner cartoons, where the roadrunner runs halfway around the circular hole beneath a natural rock bridge, and stops at the very top, standing upside down. The coyote follows him up, and promptly falls. In a crumpled heap, the coyote holds up a sign reading "That defies the law of gravity", to which the roadrunner responds (also with a sign) "I never studied law".

      The classics never get old, do they?

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  25. News for Nerds? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to come to slashdot to get away from my co-workers blabbering about their favorite reality TV show over at the water cooler. I guess the joke's on me. Reality TV has invaded yet another aspect of my life. How about an Ask Slashdot on how we nerds can cease this relentless plague and restore balance to the Force?

  26. I'm in the UK, I don't watch TV normally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this show is something else!

    Absolutely compelling stuff. And I speak as someone who can't stand 'reality shows'.

    Every show so far, there is a hundred things that will make you laugh. I can't get over how dumb these people are. There has been some claims that perhaps the 'contestants' are themselves actors, but I don't believe it - no actor could be this stupid consistently without giving the game away.

    The TV crew have even messed up a few times - the american guy who came over to lecture them on anti-gravity, gave away that they were in England (they're convinced they're in Russia) and they didn't even notice!

    Last night they had to cancel the 'money shot' view of the earth from space, because a moth flew into the warehouse containing the space shuttle, and they thought it would be a giveaway if a big moth shadow fell over the earth.

    Only, with these guys... I think they would just assume the earth was under attack by Moth-Ra or something.

    Best show this year in the UK.

    1. Re:I'm in the UK, I don't watch TV normally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see this show in the US.

    2. Re:I'm in the UK, I don't watch TV normally.... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      TORRENT PLZZZZZZZZZZ

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    3. Re:I'm in the UK, I don't watch TV normally.... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      I've seen it listed on a few members-only BT sites (low profile, not going to link them, sorry!), so they should be publically available to you if you go looking.

  27. Re: Weightlessness by OctoberSky · · Score: 1

    Damnit, I fell right into your evil plan of slowly taking over the world by encouraging missplelling.
    Fellow Slashdotters you are now allowed to put me on ignore, for I have fallen prey to the lies that fall within the headlines.

  28. British in space? by tulmad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We all know the British can hardly get someone up a ladder, much less to the moon.

    "We're monitoring you on our instruments Squindon"

    --
    "In case of emergency, break glass. Scream. Bleed to death."
    1. Re:British in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. Eddy Izzard for the motherf*cking win.

    2. Re:British in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      British astronauts (well, Helen Sharman and some close calls)

      http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/6 133/astronauts.html

    3. Re:British in space? by nickos · · Score: 1

      The parent's not flamebait! Here's where that was misquoted from.

      We didn't have enough money to put a man in a tracksuit up a ladder!

      I would've been there - "Go, man!"
      "I'm going, I'm going, 'ang on."

      "Just hang on to the ladder!"

      "Hello, Swindon, I am here."

      "Swindon, can you hear me?"

      "Swindon here. We're monitoring you on our instruments."

      "We've got you on a tuba."

      (Quiet laughter)

      That should be a bigger laugh for that joke, I think.

      Yeah, I can't quite understand it, I thought it was really funny.

      Swindon - a knackered, kind of Fresno town...

      They don't seem to be going for it.

      They're obviously bastards.

      "Anyway, Swindon, I'm nearly at the moon."

      "Actually, that's an understatement."

      "Have you got more ladder? We're not quite at the moon yet."

      "But I can see right over the top of the houses. Fantastic!"

  29. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Zenaku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And no matter how low they fly, they'll still be over your head.

    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  30. This show is ludicrous by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

    To prevent the contestants catching on to the obvious inconsistencies, they've had to discount anyone with military training, physics education and anyone with even a cursory interest in space science.
    It's basically taking the thickest 3 people they could find - I'd be suprised if any of the contestants even had any A-levels.
    Either that or the most gullible 3 people they could find, who, blinded by their desire to become famous, are willing to believe anything, however nonsensical it sounds, just to get on the telly.

    And since the entire idea of the show is to laugh at stupid/gullible people I see little point in it. I do wonder how they explained away the huge smoke cloud visible across large swathes of England at the moment though.
    Where do channel 4 get the idea that this is good entertainment?

    --
    FGD 135
    1. Re:This show is ludicrous by taustin · · Score: 1

      Where do channel 4 get the idea that this is good entertainment?

      From their ratings.

      And keep in mind, "good entertainment" means "profitable." And there are two ways to increase profit. The first is to increase revenue. The second is to reduce production cost. Reality shows are dirt cheap to make.

    2. Re:This show is ludicrous by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      I do wonder how they explained away the huge smoke cloud visible across large swathes of England at the moment though.

      Probably sidestepped the entire issue by filtering out that little bit of news entirely.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:This show is ludicrous by rbochan · · Score: 1

      ...they've had to discount anyone with military training, physics education and anyone...

      UK equivalent of No Child Left Behind, eh?

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    4. Re:This show is ludicrous by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I do wonder how they explained away the huge smoke cloud visible across large swathes of England at the moment though.

      They don;t need to. They're miles away from the fire. England isn't that small.

  31. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that sure was infor/\/\ative!

  32. Idiot Perspective by jj00 · · Score: 1

    What if the people on this show are just actors? Who would be the idiot then?

    1. Re:Idiot Perspective by yotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *What if the people on this show are just actors? Who would be the idiot then?*

      The same people who are the idiots now: The people who watch the show.

    2. Re:Idiot Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " What if the people on this [reality tv] show are just actors? "

      I've just lost faith in slashdot readers.

    3. Re:Idiot Perspective by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Or Slashdotters for buying into this press release and giving it more hype than it deserves.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  33. again? by gfanboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this is how they faked the original Apollo moon landing?

    1. Re:again? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You mean they used lame special effects and appalling junk science, and make it all fly by populating the entire planet with imbeciles?
      Well that explains a lot.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  34. The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Apparently, any prospective 'astronaut' who showed even the slightest glimmer of comprehension of the [rudiments] of physics was automatically disqualified.

    No kidding. We don't need to watch the Capricorn One sequences in which these nitwits are faked out by the producers; just show us the moments when a prospective "space tourist" showed that glimmer of intelligence and skepticism, only to be promptly whisked from the room to avoid contaminating the other hopefuls. As with American Idol (supposedly), the early elimination rounds would be the most watchable.

    But I never watched "Idol" because the idea of the early shows bugs me, and I hate this, actually.

    A show in which people volunteered to go through a *real* space training program, say the equivalent of NASA shuttle crew training, could have been interesting and would have taught the audience something. It also could easily have put the audience through the same voyeuristic "look at human nature" experience reality shows are supposed to be good for. (Whatever.)

    Instead we get yet another show by, for, and about mean and stupid people. What's the point of tricking the dufuses this way, other than to ridicule them and to show you can do it? That's sociopathic programming. Oh, wait... Maybe that's the "reality" part.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by JPriest · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      What's the point of tricking the dufuses this way, other than to ridicule them and to show you can do it?

      Sounds like religion.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful


      I think the whole idea of this program is sick. The gist of it is to laugh at people who think something great is going to happen to them, so that the audience can go "Ha ha" when it turns out they've been had.

      On the one side you've got the fact that the physics and economics doesn't work.
      On the other side, you have a television companies resources and experience, professional actors, a peer group that all believe what's happening, a sustained attempt to fool these people, a poor education on their part, and the faint glimmer of hope (soon to be extinguished) that something wonderful might actually happen to them.

      Shame on the TV company that has rooted out people who didn't get a decent education so that they can pick on them. Shame on the audience who get off on that.

      IMHO.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it would be awesome to do a 5 day simulation of a space flight, even if I knew it was fake. It would just be cool to do, and probably stressful as hell (if Mission Control decided to make it so); think of how involved you can get in a computer game you can walk away from. Now add social dynamics and the immersion factor of being in a giant space-ship mock up! It would be rad!

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would have settled for watching them be run through the screening the Mercury astronauts went through, if the movie, "The Right Stuff" is to be believed. The running of the stairs test would just about guarantee great Nielsen numbers.

      Picture one of those shows, where instead of being voted off/out/fired, etc, your teammates would vote that you had to undergo that challenge again.

      Or the boot camp one, where instead of getting to quit, if you quit they sign you up for somebody's military for real.

      But I digress.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    5. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *WISH* I'd known about this beforehand. I had an idea to make a 'reality TV' film centered around subverting a reality TV show as an infiltrator with hidden camera etc. Getting past the interviews and tests would actually be hard, it's not easy to consistently pretend to be stupid, egocentric, compliant and fake all the other psychopathologies and dregs of the human condition needed to get into the show. But imagine the laugh you can have when 5 programs into the series you suddenly 'wake up' and begin acting normally. Imagine the sweat pouring off the producers forehead as the penny drops. Just like that wonderful moment in the Truman show when they realise this guy is out of our control, he could say anything, we can't dump him or it will expose the charade to everyone.

    6. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Spudley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only had one "casting call" episode, and yes, it was entertaining. They also didn't tell the applicants what they were applying for until the end of the selection process, so these people were doing all sorts of wacky things without any clue as to why.

      I agree with you that it's a horribly cruel trick to be playing. But it does make for cringeingly funny viewing.

      On the other hand, as long as they don't work out the ruse, the participants will be awarded with a trip to the real Russian space training centre, and an experience of weightlessness in the vomit comet, so if they can stay stupid for another five days, they'll at least get the chance to do some of it for real.

      One thing I will place a bet on is that this show will be very quick to make the jump over the Atlantic. ;-)

      One final note -- there are some rumours flying around that all the contestants are actually actors, and that the whole thing is actually a hoax on the viewers. But frankly, the viewing is entertaining enough that it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. hehehe.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    7. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Three Cheers for the TV Company that rooted out these people who didn't get a decent education so that they can pick on them!

      Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them.

      After they are done they shouldn't even tell them it was a hoax. They should just send them home and wait for them to find out when they watch the first episode with all of their friends and family.

      Yes, it is harsh and cruel. But I for one am tired of letting dumb people off with a wink. They will certainly demand that the world work around their mental dilapidation when it suits them.

      Oh, criminals! Do you think that most of the people who will stab you for $10 are geniuses? No. Stupid people commit violent crimes.

      Those bullies you had to deal with? Oh yea, they went on to found an Internet Startup... wait, I'm thinking of all your dork friends. The bullies are now working at the hat store in the mall. While some might say that life is their punishment, I say put them on TV and trick them into thinking they won the lottery, when really they are wanted for beating their girlfriend. Tell them that they have been selected for a free trip to Tahiti, and then hand them a one way ticket and secretly report their credit cards stolen and replace their drivers license with "Salmun Mohomed Jihaddii"'s drivers license. Just don't forget to film it!

      This show avenges us just a little bit for every person that cuts us off because they don't understand how a four way stop works, and for all the government employees we have to deal with.

    8. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      But, maybe if they do these shows enough, they'll get to do one where they actually send the people into space.

      Yeah, probably not. But it was worth a shot.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    9. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's possible to do this sort of hoax and end up having not made a fool of the subject(s), but instead given them an opportunity to choose to make fools or heroes of themselves. See two seasons of Joe Schmoe for examples of this.

      It's also possible to do this and end up just being mean jackasses. See The WB's Superstar USA for an example of this.

      Which sells, and which doesn't? Joe Schmoe ran two seasons, and the first "winner" has been on other reality shows, where he's welcomed and regarded as a great guy. Superstar USA appeared to kind of peter out with a dismal ending and contestant on the verge of tears, and has never been heard from again. The "winner" is widely regarded as a life-support system for a lovely set of breasts.

      Spike has feelers out for a third season of Joe Schmoe, on their web site. All mention of Superstar USA appears to be gone from the WB web site other than the first press release announcing they were going to do the series.

    10. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Idiots deserve no quarter. Etc...

      That's pathetic. People can't help having difficulty understanding things. And being a moron doesn't necessarily have anything to do with being stupid. I know a few very intelligent people who are complete and utter bastards. Those are the ones to look out for.

      You, person, are frustrated, but it's not fair to vent your frustration on all the people who appear less intelligent than you think you are.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    11. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by shamino0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      After they are done they shouldn't even tell them it was a hoax. They should just send them home and wait for them to find out when they watch the first episode with all of their friends and family.

      Even more amusing would be if they don't believe the truth afterwards.

      I could easily see someone either very gullible or in deep denial, insisting that he really went into space, and that the TV program is the real hoax.

    12. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Informative

      A high school nearby me is doing this now.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    13. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "Oh those Golden Grahams
      Oh those Golden Grahams.
      Crispy, crunchy grahams cereal
      Brand new breakfast treat!"

      Full circle! Bonus to someone who can explain it...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is curable. Stupidity is terminal.

    15. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


      This show avenges us...

      Us? This last paragraph says it all. I hate to break this to you, but people who bully others at school are not necessarily stupid. Nor are intelligent people necessarily unpopular.

      If you surround people with "experts" and they tell you that in low-earth orbit there is gravity, then unless you have a good education and faith in it, then wont you believe them? After all, there's gravity on Earth and it doesn't just stop when you leave the ground... it just gets less and less, so if you're close enough to the Earth then you'll still feel gravity wont you? You'll fall you say? Well, get a weight on a string and twirl it around. If you get it going fast enough then it can overcome gravity by not falling, yes? So because the ship is going round the Earth really fast, it doesn't fall, right?

      Now I can see the flaws in that, but then I have a basic knowledge of physics and I'm not being corrected by older engineers and scientists who laugh at me when I try to tell them that I thought gravity would stop in space.

      I have two problems with this show. The first is that few people seem to think about how they would handle a long-lasting and professionally funded and staged hoax. The second is that I find it sad that people get pleasure out of picking on those less able than themselves. Given your rant about bullies at school you once felt the same about that.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    16. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      On the other hand, as long as they don't work out the ruse, the participants will be awarded with a trip to the real Russian space training centre, and an experience of weightlessness in the vomit comet, so if they can stay stupid for another five days, they'll at least get the chance to do some of it for real.

      You're kidding? You're telling me that the idea is to reward lack of curiousity and thought? Another reason why I dislike the idea of this programme, then.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    17. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Greatmoose · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. There is a delicate relationship between funny and mean-spirited. This show could be very funny, but in order to avoid being mean-spirited (or just downright abusive), there needs to be some hope for the "winners." This will be very interesting to watch...

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    18. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      Run, OJ, run!


      oh, was that in bad taste?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    19. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Tekzel · · Score: 3, Informative
      Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity'


      You know, I saw several people make this kind of statement. Up until now I was able to resist the urge, but I just couldn't do it any more. Low orbit does have gravity. What do you think keeps you IN ORBIT instead of just wisking off into the nether? Its called micro-gravity. Gravity doesn't just stop, it dwindles. I'm not a physicist so I can't be 100% certain about this part, but I THINK you are affected by gravity no matter where you go, out between the galaxies you would still have some gravitational attraction to large masses, like the galaxies itself. So, technically, you could never make the statement "so and so has no gravity".

      Eh, back to work with me.
    20. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Lars83 · · Score: 1

      Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them.

      You're right. There's absolutely no gravity when you're over 100 feet high. How else would airplanes fly?

    21. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up! And another thing: how come I can't get no Tang 'round here? And also --

    22. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them."

      That kind of thinking is ok as long as you accept that people who are smarter than you have the right to mock/tease and publicly humiliate you on national television too.

    23. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by sheppos · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. There's currently a lot of speculation that this is actually a double bluff, and the audience is the one being played here.

    24. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Dirtside · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them.
      So if someone is born with low intelligence (which is obviously no fault of theirs), then it's okay to mock them and tease them. How about Down's Syndrome kids? How about autistic kids? How about people with birth defects who have no arms or legs, or can't build bone mass properly and so have brittle bones that break frequently? How about [insert birth defect here]?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    25. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by golgotha007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are right, is is not very nice.

      However, they did get an OK from their close family or friends before putting them on the show.

      Further, when the hoax is up, each of them will receive a wad of cash, a trip to Russia for a taste of the real space program and a trip on the vomit comet so they can experience weightlessness.

      Watching this program (I'm in Russia) is hilarious, and all my Russian friends are getting a big kick out of it. Funny how they are supposedly in a place called Crimpsk (or some crap), however when they pointed to where "Crimpsk" is, they pointed to a place in the Ukraine!

      Also, Kvas (the drink in episode 2) is not a "Russian soft drink". It's a non-alcoholic grain (sometimes veggie) fermented drink (and it is downright nasty).

      The show could have done better; for example, most of the instructors were, oddly enough, British instructors. Why didn't they recruit real Russian folks for the task? lame.

    26. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting


      You are correct. Both Newton's theory of gravity and Einstein's, don't have a limit on the range of gravity. It gets weaker the farther away you get from something, but it is always there (microgravity, as you said). The only way that you would find "zero" gravity is between two objects, say the Earth and the Moon, where the pull of gravity is the same in both directions. That's not the same, of course.

      Yes - there is gravity in low earth orbit. If there weren't then you wouldn't be orbiting. Orbits happen when the gravity of an object is strong enough to bend the path of your 'flight' around it, but the momentum of your flight is powerful enough to stop you falling straight down. Essentially, you are moving sidways so quickly as you fall, that you wont hit the ground for a very long time because you keep over-shooting.

      The catch as applies to the contestants "space station" is that for them to experience gravity of even close to normal Earth gravity, they would have to be at a very low altitude (compared to true low-earth orbit) and consequently moving at horribly horribly fast speeds (that's a technical term). Also they would be burning up in the atmosphere, scaring the Hell out of the Air Force, etc. I'm not sure how high you have to go before you start noticing a loss of weight, but it's definitely a lot lower than Low Earth Orbit.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    27. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by rxmd · · Score: 1
      Idiots deserve no quarter.
      Anti-social people don't, either.
      Those bullies you had to deal with? Oh yea, they went on to found an Internet Startup... wait, I'm thinking of all your dork friends. The bullies are now working at the hat store in the mall.
      Now I consider myself an IT and role-playing geek. I don't know about your dork friends, but most of my dork friends are now either unemployed, got hooked up into role playing to the point where they can't distinguish between their elf prince alter ego and their loser reality any more, or are pot-bellied system admins working for mediocre salaries. I studied both CS and Middle Eastern history, and I think it says something that some of my dork friends actually envy me for going into the humanities afterwards. At the same time, the guys that bullied us at school went off to study law and economy.

      In your scenario, the dorks win in the end. I can't confirm this from my own experience. It looks like we've got some skewed perceptions here.

      This show avenges us just a little bit for every person that cuts us off because they don't understand how a four way stop works, and for all the government employees we have to deal with.
      I don't think this show avenges anybody, least of all any reasonably intelligent person. This type of show isn't geared at an intelligent audience. In your terminology, it's geared at idiots who enjoy watching other idiots stumble into misery. This is a show for the socially retarded.
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    28. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The human race figured out how this works 400 years ago. It goes back to Isaac Newton. It's not hard. I am quite sure that even I, a lowly AC, would see through this farce, and no amount of cajoling by authority figures would change my opinion of it.

      Also, while I get your sarcasm, for anyone else's benefit: gravity doesn't stop in space, it's just that you're falling at the same rate as your spaceship, and you keep missing the ground.

    29. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      However, they did get an OK from their close family or friends before putting them on the show.

      Well hopefully the contestants wont feel too bad afterwards. I genuinely hope they look back on it as a good thing, all in all.

      As to why they didn't use real Russians for the training? Well, you wouldn't want it to be too convincing, or else the audience wouldn't be able to laugh at their gullibility too much. ;)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    30. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Informative


      Actually, I'm very very wrong. Hopefully, I've managed to reply to my post before it gets modded up +5 Informative.

      According to what I've just looked up (here), Low Earth Orbit isn't high enough to cause feelings of weightlessness. The sensation is caused by being in free-fall as I described - you are falling, but you keep overshooting due to your speed.

      So basically, I'm wrong. On the plus side, I've just learnt something. :D

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    31. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 1

      The catch as applies to the contestants "space station" is that for them to experience gravity of even close to normal Earth gravity, they would have to be at a very low altitude (compared to true low-earth orbit)

      Actually, LEO is really almost negligibly close to the Earth's surface compared to, say, geosynchronous orbits.

      However, no matter how close to the surface your orbit might be, you will not feel any downward force. The entire craft is accelerating downward at on the order of 9 and some odd ms^{-2}, and you with it; You don't feel any force because you're falling downward with the craft.

    32. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Matthaeus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, you're both wrong, but the parent is more correct than the grandparent.

      The "gravity" we feel standing on solid ground is simply the difference between what acceleration we should be experiencing and what we actually are experiencing. Acceleration due to gravity on the earth's surface is roughly 9.8 m/s^2. When you're actually accelerating at that rate, you feel weightless. It is only because we're not accelerating at all (when at rest with regards to the surface of the earth) that we feel weight.

      An object in orbit is in free fall. There is no force opposing the force of gravity, so that object accelerates freely. If it has sufficient lateral inertia, it will continue to accelerate towards the earth's center but will continually fall around it.

      That feeling you get when the roller coaster starts going down due to gravity? That's semi-weightlessness. There's a plane called the "Vomit Comet" that uses a similar concept: fly up really high, and dive with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2. The plane's path looks like a parabola, and as long as it's in free fall, the passengers experience "weightlessness."

      The parent's mistake is assuming that an object in orbit, no matter how low, would feel weight. By definition, an object in orbit is in free fall, accelerating towards the center of the earth at the normal acceleration of gravity. This is countered by a lateral velocity of sufficient magnitude to prevent the object from actually colliding with the earth. An object in free fall feels no weight, because there is no force opposing its acceleration.

      Sorry. People who misunderstand physics are a pet peeve of mine.

      </pedantic>

    33. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by jejones · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. I consider the folks who produce "reality shows" despicable, and pandering to the worst in our behavior--but OTOH, the sort of people who win at Survivor, which rewards deceit and treachery, are equally contemptible. (Would anyone care to do business with people who can so easily rationalize lying?)

      The vilest of the vile was the WB show that intentionally selected the worst possible singers for an American Idol style show, with the punch line at the end being the scene where the finalists are told the truth, that they stink on ice. Oddly enough, I don't think the producers got what they wanted, i.e. people breaking down on camera; the people had so deceived themselves that they were still convinced that they were great. Truly sad.

    34. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by belthezar · · Score: 1

      That is fantastically cool! Thank you for sharing that. It makes me almost wish I could go back and redo high school if they had something like that going on! Almost .... hehe Actually I'd rather be one of their "ninjas" or just anyone helping out behind the scenes. :)

    35. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just stop talking. You have no idea what you're talking about.

      For starters: there is no location is the solar system that experiences "zero gravity". Notice all the objects orbiting the sun? Gravity. Weightlessness in orbit has nothing to do with zero gravity. A person in low orbit will be just as weightless as a person in geosynchronous orbit. You are weightless because you are in permanent free fall, not because there is no gravity. You can get the same experience in a plane. Remember the zero-g sports article about using planes? Yeah. As long as you are in free fall you will feel weightless.

      People are stupid. And they deserve what is coming to them.

    36. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by dilweed · · Score: 1

      A show in which people volunteered to go through a *real* space training program, say the equivalent of NASA shuttle crew training, could have been interesting and would have taught the audience something. It also could easily have put the audience through the same voyeuristic "look at human nature" experience reality shows are supposed to be good for. (Whatever.) I think you give the standard American viewer far too much credit. The same people that watch "American Idol" and "Wifeswapping" have no interest in the NASA space program. Otherwise the NASA channel would be right behind Fox in viewership numbers, and the ad revenue generated would have seen us on Mars already.

    37. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      You're kidding? You're telling me that the idea is to reward lack of curiousity and thought?

      Yes. They're rewarding it with a thought-provoking and educational experience.

      Can you think of any better way to respond to dull-minded anti-educational attitudes than by giving them an educational experience that will capture their imagination?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    38. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Idiots deserve no quarter. If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them.


      What about the idiots who are stupid enough to buy the show's premise that some of the crew aren't in on the joke?

      Get a clue and learn how media works.

    39. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Exactly.. the people know they're not in space on some level, but they're rationalizing what they've been told because they lack evidence to the contrary.
      "It's strange, this environment. I'm having fun, but I want to see more of the earth," she confided.

      "Don't you find it...strange?" asked Charlie, not leading her on in any way.

      "Yes it feels strange. I'd love to be looking out. Part of me knows we're here but part of me thinks we could be in the simulator," said Keri, shaving close to the truth.

      "Well," reassured Charlie, "Your brain plays tricks on you."
      I'm sure she's more certain than not that she's not in space, but when there are people all around you saying exactly the opposite, it takes more than being 55% sure, or even 75%. You need evidence, or you risk looking like more of a fool.

      The only thing more pathetic than this show is the people who point and laugh while thinking "I'd never do that!" when, in fact, we do it every day. How many times have articles on the front page of /. been discussed until a comment finally crops up saying "Hoax!"

      Now I'm all in favor of ridiculing stupidity and playing practical jokes. But creating an elaborate scheme designed to fool the participants for days on end so they can be derided at the national level is just pathetic.
    40. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have put your finger on the reason why Christ's disciples after 3 1/2 years of training couldn't do what they were easily managing at the start of their new carreers.

    41. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by madprof · · Score: 1

      Nope, shame on the contestants for being so stupid.
      They should have paid more attention in school.

    42. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by complete+loony · · Score: 1
      As soon as you are in orbit, you would be weightless. As soon as the engines cut off, there would be no apparant gravity. Since the whole craft would be falling, and you would be as well.

      Now you might notice a very small amount of gravity, since an object closer to the earth will have a little bit more gravity that an object further away, so an object released inside the craft may slowly fall towards the earth, or slowly rise. It won't hold you to the floor.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    43. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      It is way cooler than their unfortunate little Web site makes it appear. These kids are freakin' amazing. A friend of mine was one of the engineer adults who helped get this program off the ground (so to speak) and he gave me a tour once of the whole facility, including a runthrough of the shuttle launch exercise, complete with a pilotable miniature shuttle (operated by joystick from within) that is carried and maneuvered with a very large arm. The space station itself is staggeringly cool, even more so when you realize that high school kids designed and built all of it, with gentle guidance from their instructors.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    44. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by kjots · · Score: 1

      and the faint glimmer of hope ... that something wonderful might actually happen to them

      Something wonderful is happening to them: They are on T.V. and, based on this discussion alone, are now international celebrities. What more could a stupid person hope for?

    45. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Ain't that the +1 Sad Truth.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    46. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      I have to reply to this, I just have to, sorry!

      At the same time, the guys that bullied us at school went off to study law and economy.

      In your scenario, the dorks win in the end. I can't confirm this from my own experience.


      The fact is, the bullies that go to school and study law and economics rule over the other bullies and "dorks" with CS degrees - but the "dorks" with economic degrees rule them all.

      I speak from personal experience - you want to rule? Be a top-notch tech guy that knows business intimately!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    47. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by munpfazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You make a very good point.

      I generally can't stand the reality TV show scheme; however, I happened to catch half an episode of the first Joe Schmoe season at a friend's house and was instantly hooked. I've now seen the whole season.

      It was a remarkably humane and thoughtful program. It not only celebrated humanity at its best but managed to tackle complicated ethical questions with more depth and integrity than any other program on television. (Albeit with the occasional gratuitous tit flash.)

      Although it's not clear to me the producers *intended* (and it sure as hell isn't the program that was advertised in commercial spots), they managed to create a something genuine and moving in a field dominated by the cruel and the stupid. The result is closer to Studs Terkel than to Survivor.

      I know nothing about the astronaut show except the slashdot blurb (TFA won't cooperate with my browser at present), but there's certainly the potential there to create something which isn't mean spirited and cruel. Tone down the competition, hire people who aren't selfish and stupid, and it's possible to create something truly worthwhile in reality TV.

      I do hope they eventually straighten participants out about the bad physics they've had to feed them, though. Pointing out to the audience that their gravity explanation is total bullocks would seem an ethical must as well.

    48. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      there is no location is the solar system that experiences "zero gravity"

      Aren't Lagrange points effectively areas of "zero gravity"?

    49. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Thwomp · · Score: 1

      But it's like Chessington World of Adventures times 10,000! A favourite part of mine was the communications lecture. The cadets were *trained* on how to communicate with mission control by describing various illustrations they were shown.

      Lecturer: "What do you see?"

      Cadet: "...mission control I can see Rambo and the Fonze doing a hi-five, over."

      Priceless.

    50. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seems to have lots of unprocessed feelings trapped inside yourself, you should really go talk to somebody for your own benefit. Also you show symptoms of bitterness and outwardly directed aggressions which might hurt both you and society as a whole.

    51. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forget the sheer arrogance of these people to think they would actually be good enough.

    52. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Scooter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. If a physically stronger person sets out to humiliate another becasue they lack physical strength or dexterity, we recognise that as bad. It goes on all the time for sure, but that doesn't make it right. I feel the same is true of other human attributes. If you're a physically large guy with muscles the size of Kong's, don't pick on the weedy guy. If you're mentally well endowed, don't pick on the hard of thinking - try and help them understand a bit more instead.

      Trouble is though, these people aren't just uneducated or dim-witted: it takes a very large ego to fall for this sort of stuff - have you *seen* the set? I mean these guys may not know anything about basic physics, but even so, don't they watch reality TV shows enough to recognise one when they see it? TV shows like this have been done before in the UK - notably "BrassEye" - a fake current affairs TV show. Some very otherwise astute, and often well known people were duped into the most incredibly obvious fake-ups. It seems to me that this works using the subjects own arrogance. I mean for this current crop to actually believe some organisation would be willing to invest billions to put their unworthy arses in orbit??? The fact that the set looks like it was made on Blue Peter, and they're not allowed in the "cockpit" ?

      But still - certianly in the UK, we will laugh and joke with these guys when they emerge - and then pay them large sums of cash to appear on those shows that have people who are famous for being on those shows, er.. on them. And good luck to em - thats what I say. Jade Goody is still making good money out of it even now.

      Loved the Uranus mantra. "We are begging to come in".

      Cheers,
      Scoot.

      Oh - and those other shows like XXX Idol, X Factor, Fame Academy? All hoaxes. Every one. It was all staged to dupe 3 celebs into thinking they were judging a talent contest. Honest. They were really on the moon being experimented on by a race of creatures from somewhere near Betelgeuse 5, who all look remarkably like Jeremy Paxman. Yeeesss.

    53. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      check it out! An eligible idiot on slashdot! .. as I'm sure a heap of people have already said.. provided you're not in the atmosphere and are in an 'orbit' it doesn't matter about the height of the orbit, you should experience apparent 'weightlessness'.

      you'll be in permanent freefall towards earth thanks to gravity, but should be doing so at the same speed as the spacecraft you're in, such that it always seems like .. guess what.. weightlessness. The gravity keeps you in orbit, but you're in idiot if you think you feel gravity pushing you against the space craft so you can stand or whatever. ...I sure hope that was some kinda troll.

    54. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by afedaken · · Score: 1

      Well not necessarily Zero Gravity. The L points are spots where the gravity exerted by the earth towards the earth, is equaled by gravity from another body. It's not that there's no gravity, but rather that there's no net force exerted, or felt.

      A technicality for sure, but a significant one.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    55. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Altus · · Score: 1



      I cant believe they are going to try a third joe schmoe... the first one was pretty funny... I got sucked into it and i dont even like reality TV. but when I started watching the second one it was clear that they didnt have the quality of actors necessary to really pull it off. they kept trying to be too ridiculous and in fact one of the 2 contestants figured it out... now luckily for them she agreed to be in on the hoax on the guy that was left... but if they had only gone with one Joe Schmoe (or Jane Schmoe) they would have been screwed.

      maybe they will learn from those mistakes and go back to something more like the original

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    56. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Edzor · · Score: 1

      the callsigns are just great

      CAPCOM ( nothing wrong their...)
      FIDO
      DIDO
      KNACKERS
      :)

    57. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Jamu · · Score: 1

      Provided you're in free-fall you'll experience no weight. So a passenger in an orbital craft won't feel any gravity while in orbit. The only gravitational effects they could detect are tidal forces. The tidal forces (which act to stretch them; not to keep them on the floor) would be negligible.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    58. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Jettra · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you know when you think that you know, but you don't.

      So what if someone understand orbit and gravity. From the posts, it sounds like everyone things they do, but they don't. On a deeper level, nobody understands gravity. As far as I know this is a guess: "a spot between two gravitational forces still has gravity, but it is balanced"... How do you know that, when we don't even know exactly what gravity consists of or how it is propogated (graviton???).

      It doesn't matter. We all think we know something more or less than each other and it doesn't make us any better or worse.

      This all reminds me of a Canadian program which showed how "stupid" americans are. I think it was called "the Mercer Report" (not sure). He went to the US and interviewed americans with the most ridiculous questions about their feelings on Canadian topics. Of course all the topics were completely made up, but he dressed in a suit and said it with a straight face. He even managed to dupe some University professors. I don't think it means these people are really stupid. They were just caught off gaurd and uniformed. They just wanted to be on TV and so they pretended to understand.

      This sound like a fun and entertaining show. It's fun to see people get spoofed. I will watch if I can.

      Jeff A.

    59. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by node+3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to what I've just looked up (here), Low Earth Orbit isn't high enough to cause feelings of weightlessness. The sensation is caused by being in free-fall as I described - you are falling, but you keep overshooting due to your speed.

      The shuttle and ISS both operate in LEO. Being in orbit, any orbit, necessitates being in freefall.

    60. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      "Weightlessness" and "freefall" are exactly the same sensation with exactly the same cause, so there's no point at all in distinguishing them. Sensation of weight is the result of a force being applied with an equally reactive force in the opposite direction. On the surface of the earth, we are all being accelerated toward the center of the planet by gravity, but this is opposed by the rigidity of the ground. In, say, a very large toroidal space station such as we saw in 2001, "centrifugal force" substitutes for gravity, and the outward surface of the station substitutes for the ground; "out" becomes "down". In any kind of orbit, not just LEO, where some arrangement such as the torus above isn't in place, you feel weightless because you're experiencing the exact same acceleration as your frame of reference with no opposing force at all applied to you.

      The point is that weight has nothing to do with gravity as such, but everything do to with acceleration, whatever the source of that acceleration might be.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    61. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know where you went to, but all those assholes who were in my school are in shitty jobs, for example stacking shelves in a supermarket. All of the dorks that I know of went on to college, graduated, and have decent jobs.

      A career in law requires an awful lot of hard work in order to succeed. Those people who bullied you probably didn't graduate. And a management degree certainly doesn't ensure that you will be employed. The number of people who graduate in management is significantly more than those who actually become a manager.

      Generally speaking, people who behave like dicks don't get very far.

    62. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      The only way the producers can redeem themselves is if in the end, after choosing some sort of winner, they send him/her for a real trip in a 20 million dollar Soyuz trip reward.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    63. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Macdude · · Score: 1

      If you surround people with "experts" and they tell you that in low-earth orbit there is gravity, then unless you have a good education and faith in it, then wont you believe them?
      Of course there is gravity, you're only a couple of hundred miles up! Kripes, the moon is held in place by the earth's gravity! The trick is that you're in orbit, in other words you're in free fall with almost no atmosphere to slow you down. You're falling and everything around you (i.e. the ship) is falling at exactly the same speed so there is the illusion of a lack of gravity.

      No twonk in a white coat is going to make me believe that I'm in orbit if I'm not experienceing free fall.

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    64. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by airshowfan · · Score: 1
      Complete Loony said;

      Now you might notice a very small amount of gravity, since an object closer to the earth will have a little bit more gravity that an object further away, so an object released inside the craft may slowly fall towards the earth, or slowly rise. It won't hold you to the floor.

      Yes, those are called tidal effects. It's why we have tides - the fact that some of the earth is closer to the moon and some is farther away means that some of the water gets pulled on more strongly, so the water in the oceans "stretches" and forms two bulges - one right "under" the moon and one diametrically opposite. And the same for the sun, but less. So, yeah, if you are "under" the center of gravity of the ship (between that CG and the earth), you will "fall" just a bit, and if you are "above" the CG, you'll rise just a bit. I'm too lazy to do the claculations right now, but I'm fairly sure that, unless you are orbiting a black hole as "low" as you can, it's not noticeable.

    65. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      "Low Earth Orbit isn't high enough to cause feelings of weightlessness" Can you explain me the difference between "low earth orbit" and "high earth orbit"? besides the altitude and speed? it's the same thing, works the same way. If you got some trouble understanding how that whole orbitting thing works like, mess around with that http://lcs.www.media.mit.edu/groups/el/projects/sp acewar/

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    66. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      there are some rumours flying around that all the contestants are actually actors, and that the whole thing is actually a hoax on the viewers.

      You could've just said, In Soviet Russia...

      and we'd all understand, here in Slashdotland.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    67. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The first is that few people seem to think about how they would handle a long-lasting and professionally funded and staged hoax.

      I imagine a show called "The Girlfriend" - a rip on Beauty and the Geek but you don't know you're on TV and that "The Girlfriend" is an actress. Presumably you signed some waivers trying to get on some different TV show (but you are left with the impression you were rejected - nuh uh) and they only use the people dumb enough not to request a copy of the 50-page contract/beast (those that do would be left with not enough info and no "Girlfriend" to make them suspicious. Oh? Did I mention "The Girlfriend" is a guy and you will have sex with it? Yuk!

    68. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by node+3 · · Score: 1

      "Low Earth Orbit isn't high enough to cause feelings of weightlessness"

      You've got me confused for someone else. I not only did not write those words above, I not only did not even include those words as a quite, I specifically pointed out that the exact opposite is the case.

    69. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Oops...

      I did quote that part. But the point remains that you replied to the wrong person.

    70. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by kaitou · · Score: 1

      Nah, I actualy don't mind Kvas all that much at all, so long as its not overly heavy. But 'soft drink' makes sense as a description for a quick idea of what it is. I've seen it compared to root beer.

    71. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      No. A Lagrange point is where the gravitational force from the earth is canceled out by another gravitational force. There is still gravity acting on a body there, and there is still a net gravitational force acting on the body. L1 and L2 lagrange points are simply locations where an object can orbit the sun without being affected by the earth, but still being relativily close to the earth. The LISA experiment will be based at one of the two points (I forget which). However, it is not a point of zero gravity.

    72. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      they don't get 20 million dollars but they do get some money and REAL training for a "vomit comet" zero-gravity flight.

    73. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

      Orbit low enough to still feel gravity?

      I dunno, microgravity sounds to me like it might not be something ordinary people would feel.

    74. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short answer: no
      Long anser: depends if lying is in Your favour
      Somewhat philosophical answer: I don't encourage lying

    75. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by qeveren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also bear in mind that 'rotational artificial gravity' (that effect caused by 'centrifugal force') is not indistinguishable from real gravity. For instance, if you walk in the direction of rotation, you'll feel heavier, and the opposite is true as well. Also, you'll be prone to dizziness, as gyroscopic effects will sometimes make it more difficult to turn your head in one direction than another. It'd be a fun, strange environment. :)

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    76. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      He's trying to reply to me. I mistakenly thought that the "weightlessness" in LEO was due to being remote from the Earth. I was sitting there afterwards, thinking... "is that right? I think I'd better look that up." I caught it before anyone else replied, but not before it had been modded up several times.

      Well at least it backs up the point I was making earlier about how easy it is to fool people. ;) And at least I caught it and 'fessed up before anyone else saw it and replied.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    77. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      I think the whole idea of this program is sick. The gist of it is to laugh at people who think something great is going to happen to them, so that the audience can go "Ha ha" when it turns out they've been had.

      I agree absolutely -- I find these types of programs quite disgusting.

      There's a very good reason why researchers these days are (usually) required to get ethical approval before they run psychological experiments on humans, and it's much more for the life-long wellbeing of the subjects than it is for the researchers.

      I find ridiculous that television producers can get away not only with treating people in ways that mimic some serious experimental conditions, but humiliating them in front of millions of people afterwards, and then having none of the controls, simply because it's not in their commercial interests to do so. Trying to buy them out afterwards for good press is irrelevant.

    78. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by minus9 · · Score: 1


      "the guys that bullied us at school went off to study law and economy."

      You had a much better class of bully at school than at ours.

      A show made by idiots, to allow idiots to watch other idiots is a good summary though.

      It also has to be added that Johnny Vaughan (the host of the show) is an annoying smug twat.

    79. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      To be sure, although I think with a very large torus the effects are minimized. But the point is that the feeling of weight comes from acceleration, whatever the source of the force. If you were on a rocket ship undergoing a constant acceleration of 9.8m/sec^2 you'd feel (while the acceleration lasted) exactly as if you were on the surface of the Earth at sea level.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    80. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Well said, I quite agree.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    81. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      ooh yeah, sorry, I thought I was replying to the guy who wrote this as you're only the guy who quoted this.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    82. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by aug24 · · Score: 1

      The only reason anyone in any vessel feels heavy is because the vessel is being accelerated relative to them. In a car, the wheels are in touch with the ground and that is the source of the (acceleration) force.

      In a stationary lift, as for the car but with cables providing the force. In a plumetting lift, both are under the same acceleration (zero relative acceleration) and so one feels weightless. In a lift going up, one feels extra heavy.

      So it doesn't matter where you are. If you're in a plane just above the ground and the wings fall off, you will feel weightless. If you are skydiving in a bubble you will feel weightless.

      In other words... you were right, and both your posts should not be moderated +Anything informative!

      Cheers,
      Justin (Physic, Maths, Oracle and Java bunny).

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    83. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Of course there's gravity up there, the reason people in low orbit won't feel it is because they're freefalling.

    84. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by arwel · · Score: 1

      Well at least they're each getting paid £5000 a day for their trouble. The TV company did go to considerable lengths to exclude anyone who might have a reasonable kowledge of what space is really like -- knowing more than four characters in "Star Trek: The Next Generation" was one of the criteria for elimination at the selection stage!

    85. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Also, Kvas (the drink in episode 2) is not a "Russian soft drink". It's a non-alcoholic grain (sometimes veggie) fermented drink (and it is downright nasty).

      Fermented -> alcoholic. Fermentation is the conversion of sugar into alcohol and carbon dioxide. Kvass is very low alcohol generally--although I've known Russian monks who brewed it with quite a kick...

    86. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Pointing out to the audience that their gravity explanation is total bullocks would seem an ethical must as well.

      Buried in the website for the program, there is an indication that the science advisor for the show only agreed to do it after he was assured that they are going to flag onscreen whenever what he's saying to the contestents is dodgy. I have not seen the program (which is already airing) to determine if this is indeed the case.

    87. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Yea, my feelings exactly. I think it's just wrong. I don't care what the people are, who they are, how smart they are.. Nobody deserves to be humiliated on TV like that. In front of everyone they know.

      The only thing that would make it okay would be to give them all $1,000,000 when the show is over. They could then at least say "Hey, I've got a million bucks! Bite me." But you know that ain't gonna happen.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    88. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Or you could simply try to spin a coin on the floor. ;)

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    89. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Would you like to be on a new tv show this fall? We're sending people to the center of the earth!

      There is no gravitational effect in any orbit. There is 'microgravity' but that is so small that you can't physically feel it.

    90. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Lars83 · · Score: 1

      WTF? Is it the blasters on the rocket ship that keep it in orbit?

    91. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      It depends really. If I were a Kantian I would agree with you. Since I'm not, I'll say it's not ok at all.

      You would like to take some sort of golden rule as being valid. However, there is no evidence that applying this rule generally to all people produces favorable results. In fact, requiring this rule to apply to those outside your social 'in-group' is asking to be taken advantage of.

      I would imagine you (would) let your children borrow your car. Do you let the kids from the local highschool borrow your car as well?

      Of course you would say that you don't expect those kids from the highschool to let you borrow their car, so you are satisfying the golden rule, treat others as you would have them treat you..

      But I would imagine that you would expect your children to let you borrow their car if you asked. So you see, you have a social 'in-group', your family, and you have a certain level of trust and expectation of reciprication within that group that doesn't extend to everyone.

      For every favorable thing you do for people there is such an 'in-group', where you have expectations and they have expectations of you. Beyond each of these groups there are sharply defined limits of what you are willing to risk in any transaction.

      Besides, for your logic to be true, that I would have to accept being teased and made fun of by more intelligent people, would require that those dummies on this program also accept such treatment from me. Since the teasing is being foisted on them, I fully expect that they and I would react similarly once the deception was uncovered.

      OTOH, I would also expect that these people would kick me in the head if the reward were high enough and it was a socially acceptable thing to do, so I owe them nothing.

    92. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: People with disabilities are made fun of everyday by a great majority of people!

      What if someone is mentally handicapped, and when they see you laughing and making fun of them they think that it is all great fun and they laugh along, because they don't have the ability to understand what is going on? Is that cruel? Whatever you say, it is only cruel to onlookers who empathize (misplaced empathy) with the retarded person.

      Oh, and what do you call a man with no arms and no legs who is in the pool? Bob!

    93. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      You make fair points.

      But I will point out that your dork friends would not have 'escaped' into fictional worlds if they were not so uncomfortable and alienated from reality. Bullies play a large part in this process, but abusive homes would also be a major factor.

      In all honesty I was just giving the mirror argument to those people denouncing the show, and I tried to make the most boisterous arguments possible. shhh! Don't let the cat out of the bag.

      However, I would like to make a minor point. People tend to group all social outcasts together as 'dorks'. However, the level of intelligence among social outcasts (and by social outcast I mean in the childish high-school sense) span all intelligence brackets. I've known a lot of 'dorks' who were also complete idiots. And most of those guys now LARP their life away and work at the ice-cream factory for pot money. Most of the reasonably intelligent dorks I know went to college at least, and although they might not be very happy, they are getting along fine.

    94. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      The sooner they make them, the better. With all the cable channels that keep cropping up, it's harder and harder to find a good actor who hasn't been on national television in some capacity.

      I remember last year on "Next Action Star", they kicked a lady off in one segment, and the very first commercial after that segment was a national ad for some cosmetics or personal grooming product, starring her. The ad still runs, while the show and its winners fade into the murky depths of ill-remembered bad TV.

    95. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Technically? Technically any body in orbit is moving in a straight line through space-time. Therefore it does not require any force to act on it (including blasters), if you recall newtons three laws, to remain moving in a straight line at a constant velocity.

      Since a body in orbit is moving in a straight line through space-time it is identical to moving in a straight line through open space far from any massive bodies. Ergo, No gravity.

      Think about it. F=m*a. If gravity were acting on the body in orbit, the people inside would feel the acceleration due to that force. Since they aren't pinned up against one or the other walls of the space ship you must conclude that there is not a force acting on them.

      You might say "but what is keeping it from going off into space then". You are confusing the force of gravity with the pseudo-force of the ground pushing up to resist you. Yes, gravity is keeping their ship from going off into space. But not by "pulling" on them. Gravity has bent space-time such that straight space-time paths around the earth are circular if you are going at the correct velocity. This is a result of the number of dimensions we live in. If you add or take away dimensions, gravity would pull as the inverse or the inverse^3 of the distance, and either no orbits would be stable, or every orbit would be stable.

      Rest assured, there is no gravity from the standpoint of any body in orbit (obviously there is the gravity from other bodies in orbit and so forth, but this is small).

    96. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      People with disabilities are made fun of everyday by a great majority of people!
      Aaaaaaand, this makes it ethical or moral to do so? Just because a lot of people do it?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    97. Re:The "Casting Call" episodes must be the best by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, did you tell me why it was not moral or not ethical? Hmmm.. No you didn't. So your theory of the world seems to be that you get to tell me that I'm wrong, and then I have to respond with proofs that I'm right.

      If it's so obvious to you that this is unethical, please explain it to me. I honestly don't see why.

  35. How to find people that gullible by n0mad6 · · Score: 4, Informative
    For other Americans like myself who don't get to watch the show and are wondering just how they found enough people that stupid to fall for this, Wikipedia had some of the answers:

    In order for the hoax to stand a realistic chance of succeeding, the Cadets would have to remain unaware of the true nature of the show, even given any production mistakes and implausible explanations. As such, a strict set of criteria were applied to filter out inappropriate applicants:

    • Eliminating anyone who had ever served in the armed forces, or who already had a significant interest in space travel or science fiction.
    • Psychological tests used to single out the highly suggestible and those who would conform to groupthink
    • Physiological tests to determine claustrophobia, including being in restraining jackets and trapped in a full lift
    • Being asked to dance blindfolded, without music, and with others watching, to gauge inhibition levels
    • Asking the candidates to nominate a friend or relative they trusted implicitly, to make a vital and important decision for them. These friends or relatives were contacted, and fully let in on the hoax, and given the final say of whether or not the Cadet should be included

    The intention was to obtain a group of Cadets who were highly gullible, conformist, and ignorant about the show's subject matter; and also ideally suited to appearing in a Reality TV show (e.g. uninhibited extroverts, "wacky personalities", or characters otherwise able to capture the public interest).

    1. Re:How to find people that gullible by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I wonder if we could use the same set of psychological tests to decide who gets barred from voting...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:How to find people that gullible by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      ... and it's interesting that so many of the contestants are Welsh. Bless 'em!

      I've watched a few hours of the show. I can't say I like it. It's taking the piss out of people's dreams. And it doesn't matter how low your IQ, you're still entitled to dream. The whole thing's designed to make fools out of the participants, and that sort of thing doesn't sit well with me.

      Being a bit of a geek, and having hopes for space travel, all I can think of when watching these people is:

      "There but the grace of God (and a little cynicism, knowlege and common sense) go I"

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    3. Re:How to find people that gullible by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Oops. "There but the grace..." should've read "There but by the grace..."

      But ya knew what I meant, didn't you? :)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    4. Re:How to find people that gullible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew you meant "There but for the grace..." :D

    5. Re:How to find people that gullible by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Yeah, why not. That word tastes better :)

      Thanks!

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    6. Re:How to find people that gullible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and it's interesting that so many of the contestants are Welsh. Bless 'em!
      Or, alternatively, your mighty English[1] intellect was fooled by this banal hoax.

      Both these statements are, of course, borderline racism...

      [1] If this is an unfair assumption, I apologise for any offence caused.
    7. Re:How to find people that gullible by aquatone282 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn, sounds like today's Democrats.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:How to find people that gullible by whoniverse · · Score: 1
      Eliminating anyone who had ever served in the armed forces, or who already had a significant interest in space travel or science fiction.
      Well, if they'd ever seen the Doctor Who story Invasion of the Dinosaurs, they'd have seen people falling for precisely this particular hoax. So when are the fake-looking Dinosaurs going to attack London?
    9. Re:How to find people that gullible by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1
      ... and it's interesting that so many of the contestants are Welsh. Bless 'em!
      It's probably just that their minds are a bit wooly... (I'd like to apologise to any Welse readers who this may have offended, here's a little something to make it up.
  36. Ohnoes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohnoes! Scuttlemonkey is also CmdrTaco!

  37. Boy, talk about a Freudian slip... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    "(rather than outer space where the wightlessnes is)"

    You came real close to spelling "weightless" as "witless"

    I'm just sayin'

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  38. wasn't so bad until... by lythandesi · · Score: 1

    This actually sounded like much better idea for a reality TV show than most, until I RTFA. Why do they insist on making all these things redicioulously cheasy? More importantly, why do we enjoy seeing the monotony of our daily lives mirrored in front of us so much? To stroke our egos!?

  39. Heavy Boots by Redshift · · Score: 1

    Gravity generators? Why bother, why not just give them Heavy Boots to wear?

    1. Re:Heavy Boots by orion41us · · Score: 1

      Ha!! I was in a similar situation a while back, but it was trying to explain that in fact the moon does rotate about it's axis.....

  40. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We must act immediately to close the Stupid Gap!

  41. Laughing at the handicapped by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

    Most people wouldn't point and laugh at retarded kids, and the difference between them and these guys is only a matter of degree. How high an IQ does someone have to have before it's okay to mock them for being stupid?

    --

    Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    1. Re:Laughing at the handicapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's the difference between retarded and stupid.

      If one can't learn because one is unable to, that's not funny.

      If one doesn't learn because one has no interests other than looking good for the opposite sex, their ignorance is their fault and we can laugh at them.

    2. Re:Laughing at the handicapped by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      II think I should point out that sometimes low IQ comes about by free choices people have made in their life.

      Go ahead and laugh at them, I'll admit to laughing at them.

      But I would never point and laugh at people who have honestly tried or have been mentally inhibited through either deseases, defects or someone else's choices.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Laughing at the handicapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, keep your morals out of my humour. i laugh at retards all the time!

    4. Re:Laughing at the handicapped by cornface · · Score: 0, Troll

      If one doesn't learn because one has no interests other than looking good for the opposite sex, their ignorance is their fault and we can laugh at them.

      Yes, because getting laid sucks!

      Boooooo!

      BOOOOOOOO!

  42. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by ndansmith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No way! Many American reality shows and even the concept of reality tv are borrowed from Great Britain. Yes, though many Americans would hate to admit it, the US is still culturally reactive to Britain and Europe at large.

  43. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it is from Rip Aster Onkey.

  44. The joke is on all of you. by ashitaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the "astronauts" know it's just a show.

    Of course they know they're not in space.

    What you are witnessing is the first real reality show backlash. The TV programmers have figured out that there are enough gullible people in the world who watch and believe these shows that they can hire a basically competant series of actors who go through the motions of a reality series. Come on, they've been able to study the reactions of reality show participants for months if not years.

    The real "participants" in this series are the audience who laugh at "players" they think are stupid enough to believe what they are going through and post messages on blogs and sites like Slashdot being so witty about America not being the only stupid country. The producers can then show all these blogs and the reactions of audience members who they've interviewed before revealing the that the joke is on them.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:The joke is on all of you. by pHatidic · · Score: 1

      And this is different than every other reality TV show how exactly? Reality TV shows are like sausage -- they are entertaining but you don't want to know how they're made.

    2. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that you're right. I've seen this show and it strikes me as being particularly cruel. Just because someone is gullible enough to fall for a trick like this it doesn't mean that we should expose this fact for our own entertainment. True justice would be served if the audience were the ultimate victims!

    3. Re:The joke is on all of you. by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Hey, sausages, entertaining in the same sentence.. thats something I didnt want to know about _you_.

    4. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Floody · · Score: 1

      Of course the "astronauts" know it's just a show.

      Of course they know they're not in space.

      What you are witnessing is the first real reality show backlash. The TV programmers have figured out that there are enough gullible people in the world who watch and believe these shows that they can hire a basically competant series of actors who go through the motions of a reality series. Come on, they've been able to study the reactions of reality show participants for months if not years.

      The real "participants" in this series are the audience who laugh at "players" they think are stupid enough to believe what they are going through and post messages on blogs and sites like Slashdot being so witty about America not being the only stupid country. The producers can then show all these blogs and the reactions of audience members who they've interviewed before revealing the that the joke is on them.

      Ding, ding, ding ... Bingo! We have a winner. Bout damn time.

      I'm just amazed at how friggin' gullible the /. "audience" apparently is to fall for this.

    5. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      I was just about to order my own gravity generator, but your post had enough gravity that it would be redundant now...

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    6. Re:The joke is on all of you. by mrtrumbe · · Score: 1
      Two words for you: prove it.

      I love the new "arrogance is truth" culture we are building in this country. Just say something loud, arrogantly and with enough venom and OF COURSE it is true, dummy. You could teach Punditry 101.

      Taft

    7. Re:The joke is on all of you. by garcia · · Score: 1

      The TV programmers have figured out that there are enough gullible people in the world who watch and believe these shows that they can hire a basically competant series of actors who go through the motions of a reality series.

      Uhh, the first? No. I realize that most people here are smart enough to shy away from watching the mind-numbing antics that "Reality TV" provides but being one of the sole Slashdotters that is married, I'm sucked into watching these shows w/my wife (if I didn't we wouldn't spend any time together). The Real World (faked, including the "engagement" of two of the on show actors -- probably MTV trying to be like Survivor and have a televised wedding). Survivor? Pay close attention to the size of the readily available fire wood. Looks precut to me. Joe Millionaire? All a bunch of bullshit.

      So it's not the first -- only the first to appear on the "New and Improved" Slashdot -- News for Nerds, Stuff that only matters to *everyone else*.

    8. Re:The joke is on all of you. by driftingAimfully · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That hadn't occurred to me. Hmm, maybe it's me being fooled. I admire your cynicism.

      But, on second thoughts, I don't think you're likely to be right. For one reason: money. If they make idiots of 12 people then 10 million people (I'm guessing the audience size) laugh and feel good and watch more Channel 4 and buy stuff that is advertised in the gaps between the show. (Okay, maybe 9,999,842 people laugh and 58 people complain indignantly - as is their right).

      But, if they make idiots of 10 million people then 10 million people feel a bit foolish and sort of laugh and sort of feel stupid and when the Next Reality Show comes along (as it surely will) then they are less likely to watch and less likely to buy stuff that is advertised in the gaps between the show. (Okay, maybe 9,999,842 people feel stupid and 58 people say "aha, I told you!").

      Or, to put it another way, don't buy the hand that feeds you.

      I'm going to watch it tonight anyway. It is funny. Maybe a little lengthy, but these shows seem to be designed to fill in the time between adverts.

    9. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real "participants" in this series are the audience who laugh at "players" they think are stupid enough to believe what they are going through and post messages on blogs and sites like Slashdot being so witty about America not being the only stupid country.

      In Soviet Russia, Reality TV watches you.

    10. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      "Infidel Guy," an atheist radio talk show host, recently went on the show Wife Swap in hopes of showing the masses that atheists are real people just like them.

      What happened instead was that ABC took something like 60 hours of footage and molded it into exactly the kind of atheist stereotype IG was trying to debunk. The comments he and his wife made were frequently taken out of context. The narrator described them as agoraphobic workaholics, and then cut all footage of them playing with their kids or going outside. Video and audio tracks were mixed and matched to make them appear to nod in agreement at voice tracks from some other piece of footage.

      Anyway, the point is that the networks intent to deceive is already evident in shows that are technically from real life, which makes the idea that they'd do a completely fraudulent show pretty credible.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    11. Re:The joke is on all of you. by driftingAimfully · · Score: 1

      ... don't bite the hand that feeds you

      Damn. (I did preview my post, honest. I only have ignorance in my defence.)

    12. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1
      Does one need to prove the sky is blue? The fact is, anyone who denies it either doesn't speak the language, is blind, or is a moron.

      Simple economics shows this is completely implausible. The cost of building a simulation good enough to fool people is way too high to be worth the risk that one of the "contestants" discovers it's all fake blowing the investment.

      You're living proof that there are people stupid enough to fall for a hoax like this whereas hoaxing a bunch of individuals "close up" over an extended period of time is a very hard and expensive task. Given that hoaxing the audience and hoaxing the "contestants" cost a widely differing amount of money but both would net the same audience why go for the more expensive option?

    13. Re:The joke is on all of you. by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two words for you: prove it.

      This post from another thread seems to do so -- stuff confirming the participants are actors when the show claims they're not. Some counterarguments follow in the linked thread, but it sounds like a reasonable theory with fairly good evidence to me.

    14. Re:The joke is on all of you. by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well said. Anyone else notice that the guy with the ginger afro appeared in a "Give Blood" (blood donation) advert and saved Gordon Ramsey's life in it? Obviously the casting people can't be trying that hard if an actor that's appeared on TV fairly recently can show up as a "legitimate" contestant. See the commercial here:
      http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/flashAdvert5L.htm

      And here's the guy's profile:
      http://channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/S/ spacecadets/cadets/ryan-mcbride.html

      Oooh, it's the *same guy*, who'd have thought? (Incidentally, some friends met him at the Wickerman festival & said he was a thoroughly nice chap. And an actor.)

      It's obviously exactly what you say, the next generation of reality show, but probably not quite so simple in that I think they KNOW that plants will be exposed, so plan on playing this out in the media for as much hype as possible. This does then imply that there must then be at least one REAL contestant who is blissfully unaware of all this (i.e. not the sharpest tool in the box) who gets to be "Truman".

      Personally I'd prefer it if Channel 4 actually spent money on a decent programming instead of throwing their money at Endemol for crap like this. At least we've got the BBC, eh?

    15. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Internet post #425,602,101 made by someone who has "figured it out" that (insert name of reality show here) is actually a hoax on the viewer, not on the cast.

    16. Re:The joke is on all of you. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      One of the sole Slashdotters that is married. And of course to a stupid woman. Slashdotters can't find the good ones.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    17. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when have channel 4 ever cared about anything? they put full sex, dodgy violence, swearing, anything they want on. Because they are channel 4 and that's why we love them!

    18. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Uhlek · · Score: 1

      A vast majority of actors are not full-time. Most of them pull other jobs in-between gigs, and they're also the ones most likely to aim for these reality show tryouts -- mainly because they've already got jobs that they can drop for a temporary period, and they're hungry for the fame and potential future jobs that a reality show appearance might rake in. Plus they have agents who's job it is to constantly search for these things.

      Remember that stupid reality show they had where they got a supposed average guy and tricked a bunch of girls into thinking he was a millionaire? They claimed he was a "construction worker" -- which he was, but only when he wasn't doing acting jobs or underwear ads.

    19. Re:The joke is on all of you. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I actually am of the mind that it's a triple-bluff.

      At the end of the show, the actors get out of the simulator, point at the TV and laugh at how stupid the audience were. But then, Channel 4 tells them they've actually BEEN in space.

    20. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...being one of the sole Slashdotters that is married, I'm sucked into watching these shows w/my wife (if I didn't we wouldn't spend any time together).

      Sounds like a pretty exciting marriage.

      And just think. If you got a Tivo, you could watch your wife on those reality shows over and over and spend all day with your "reality" wife and never be alone again. At least as long as the power didn't go out.

    21. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Jiminez · · Score: 1

      Its so sweet that people have the urge to believe this double hoax, "the joke is on the audience" conspiracy - it indicates important psychological tells in their personality which compel them to think they can see something the stupid masses can't, in the face of otherwise obvious facts, such as:

      - no professional actor could possibly act as the contestants have for that length of time and with that level (or rather lack) of intelligence.
      - a lack of financial incentive for endemol the producers.
      - the viewing public backlash and effect on future reality shows
      - and the absolute impossibility of keeping it a secret from the most voraciously carniverous press in the world.
      - oh, and a [i]complete lack of any realistic evidence to the contrary[/i].

      Just enjoy the hoax. These guys are going to be stars.

    22. Re:The joke is on all of you. by sstidman · · Score: 1

      I didn't personally think the evidence for this theory was that compelling. According to other posts in this thread, they did a casting call without explaining what the show was about. And guess who showed up for this casting call? Lots of wannabe actors. It's seems entirely reasonable to me that the folks could be actors and also not be in on the gag. Alot of the folks who try to get on these reality shows are wannabe actors. They see it as a springboard into better gigs.

      --
      Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
    23. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I want to believe that. I want to believe that they didn't find people who see no contradiction between "low Earth orbit" and "distant view of Earth." I want to believe these people weren't fooled by the lack of incredible acceleration during launch. Most of all I want to believe that the producers aren't cruel enough to mess with people's dreams to that level.

      Unfortunately, I'm too cynical about the TV industry to be convinced either way.

    24. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      one of the sole Slashdotters...

      Does that make you more unique than the rest?

    25. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      no professional actor could possibly act as the contestants have for that length of time and with that level (or rather lack) of intelligence.

      Speaking of arrogance -- you've got to be kidding, right? How many hours of footage are actually aired on this show? How many hours are aired in a typical TV season?

      I'm not saying this is or isn't what's going on, but a professional actor should be entirely capable of maintaining a character over the course of a TV series, whether it's open fiction or a fake reality show.

    26. Re:The joke is on all of you. by clem.dickey · · Score: 1

      > The real "participants" in this series are the audience

      Reminds me of the idiot who was so dumb that, when offered the choice between a nickel and a dime, he would always take the nickel because it was bigger. People came from miles around to offer him nickels and dimes, and he always took the nickels.

    27. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Simple economics shows this is completely implausible. The cost of building a simulation good enough to fool people is way too high to be worth the risk that one of the "contestants" discovers it's all fake blowing the investment.
      Right, because once one person figures it out they have to throw all the props in the trash because in order to use them again they would have to, oh I don't know, go out and find half a dozen more people, and that's just crazy talk.

      I'm not saying it isn't a hoax on the viewers, I am just saying your reasoning is dumb.

    28. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Jiminez · · Score: 1

      pish. don't get me wrong, there are 3 professional actors acting away, and they are great, but it is very evident that they are acting, and they are all extremely intelligent. Now the feed is on all the time, and the contestants natural, base reactions are at a level a method actor could only dream of. It's obviously not a hoax.

    29. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I didn't notice the live feed when I looked at the site earlier. I imagine it would be hard to stay in character 24 hours a day. That said, I don't think it's impossible, either -- certainly stage-trained actors can stay in character for hours, and people sometimes do performance pieces where they maintain a persona while interacting with people over the course of a whole day (though I'm sure they relax when they go home or to their hotel room afterward).

      Again, I'm not saying it has to be a double-hoax, just that it could be.

    30. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I hate point-by-point rebuttals, but there's really no other format to address your "proof."

      no professional actor could possibly act as the contestants have for that length of time and with that level (or rather lack) of intelligence.

      "Cut! Take two!" What? Do you think a fake reality TV show is bound by the "one take" rule of normal reality TV shows?

      a lack of financial incentive for endemol the producers.

      They've gotten their ad-revenue either way once the show's over and the joke's public. It doesn't matter to them.

      the viewing public backlash and effect on future reality shows

      Maybe they don't particularly care for reality shows (since they're the type of production company who uses scripts and actors to go about their business). Maybe they're actually contemptuous of their audience like many of suspect the creators of most reality TV shows that came after Survivor are. Maybe they're sick of reality TV as well and would like to see it die. Who knows?

      While Endemol UK has a few companies that have done a lot of reality TV, the company doing Space Cadets is Zeppotron, a comedy producer. Many of their programs have a sort of in-your-face Dadaism about them. I wouldn't put it past a company like this to pull an Andy Kauffman on the British public.

      and the absolute impossibility of keeping it a secret from the most voraciously carniverous press in the world.

      You only have to keep it secret from the majority of your audience for six weeks or so since it's a short-run program. Even so, it's not the tabloids that have picked up on the issue so much as the nit-picky bloggers that big media still haven't got a good grip on yet. Besides, if you muddy the rumors enough, people may watch just to find out if it's a hoax or not. I admit that my only interest in the show is related to this, and I'd be watching it right now if I could just to see which way it goes based purely on the assumption that it is a hoax on the viewers. Otherwise, I'd have no interest.

      oh, and a [i]complete lack of any realistic evidence to the contrary[/i].

      Other than this? Come on, two of the contestants are actors, and that's nowhere in their bios! Do you think that's just coincidence?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    31. Re:The joke is on all of you. by TehHustler · · Score: 1

      Since I keep reading this everywhere, I suddenly thought, maybe he just donated some blood for real, and he's not really an actor. Noone's considered that. I don't think the Give Blood management would willingly use actors for such a well publicised and good natured campaign.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    32. Re:The joke is on all of you. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Ha! that's where you're wrong.
      I am watching this show, perfectly aware that the contestants are actors pretending to be fooled by their surroundings. I watch it and only PRETEND to believe it, thus making it a triple hoax, and putting the joke on the producers of the show, because they think that I think that the contestants think that's it's real. But I don't. So there.

      It was SO totally worth my spending almost a minute of my life to write this post. Everything I have ever done is vindicated now. That is all.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    33. Re:The joke is on all of you. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      You can read an excellent analysis of the InfidelGuy wifeswap show by one of the forum's members here (look for the posts by "Buckster", starting with the very second one on the page). It's very revealing about the nature of "reality TV" in general, and just how removed from reality it really is.

      Not to say that necessarily means this Space Cadets program is made the same way though, but it's definitely worth bearing in mind. (Major differences that spring to mind: participants not interacting with camera/production crew. Show streamed live on the web much of the time which allows for less editing down to change events without getting caught)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    34. Re:The joke is on all of you. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      I actually am of the mind that it's a triple-bluff.

      At the end of the show, the actors get out of the simulator, point at the TV and laugh at how stupid the audience were. But then, Channel 4 tells them they've actually BEEN in space.


      Doesn't that go more like...
      At the end of the show, the actors get out of the "simulator", point at the TV, laugh for a second, then choke, turn blue and asphyxiate in the cold depths of space, live on television to the hilarity of the viewing audience?

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    35. Re:The joke is on all of you. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      hoaxing a bunch of individuals "close up" over an extended period of time is a very hard and expensive task.

      That of course was the basic flaw in The Truman show. Why spend billions to fool one person when you can hire an actor to pretend? Also, how lucky was the producer to pick a child who would grow up to be Jim Carrey.... if he'd chosen, say, me, he'd be cancelled so quick.

    36. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      Other than this? Come on, two of the contestants are actors, and that's nowhere in their bios! Do you think that's just coincidence?
      That's what actors do - they go on television as much as they can. Check out the casts of US reality shows like Survivor, Amazing Race etc, and you'll find actors, models, bartenders who want to be actors, etc up the wazoo. They continually get cast because they're generally attractive, and know what to do around cameras. And they almost never include Actor in their bios, as the public prefers "regular folk" on reality shows.

      Go back further before the reality era, and you'll find them all over the place as contestants on game shows. The Dating Game is a veritable Who's Who of Struggling Actordom, watch the old tapes and you'll find dozens and dozens then unknowns like Steve Martin, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Andy Kaufman, etc.

    37. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a pretty plausible rebuttal. Now I'm not sure if the show's pure sadism or a joke on the viewer. Either way, I hope I remember to look this up a couple of months from now when it's over to find out. I really do hope it's a joke on the viewer because the kind of people who would enjoy the show for its sadism NEED to be humbled.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    38. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1
      Right, because once one person figures it out they have to throw all the props in the trash because in order to use them again they would have to, oh I don't know, go out and find half a dozen more people, and that's just crazy talk.
      Yes.
    39. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Jiminez · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, now its all over, it may best go back and read my previous post there dude. Turns out there might have been some valid points in there after all...

    40. Re:The joke is on all of you. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      No, not really. I still consider myself as having effectively rebutted all of your points. You were not the one to raise the issue that many reality TV contestants are actors. In fact, the only thing you said about actors was that they couldn't possibly keep up the ruse -- under the assumption that they were being filmed without retakes and that the editors of the show are too stupid to not use scenes where they shatter the illusion in the show. Heck, even if the show were 100% real it completely depends on other actors being capable of keeping up the ruse to the supposed dupes! Did you miss the bit about the guy playing a crazy Russian pilot?

      Sorry to sound mean and all, but I stand by my statement that your arguments are all invalid with the possible exception of the statement about there being no evidence to the contrary since the other person I replied to muddied the evidence I responded with.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  45. I wonder if they'll call this... by dirtyharry925 · · Score: 1

    The Real World: Space Castmates will get drunk, have sex, break things and try to hold down a job WHILE IN SPACE!!! I hope the producers at MTV aren't getting any ideas...

    1. Re:I wonder if they'll call this... by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      Big difference being that MTV has the budget to actually send THEIR castmates into space.

  46. We didn't lose the monopoly by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Funny

    they licensed the patent.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  47. Moral Responisibility by p0 · · Score: 1

    Hah. How can they fool them like this? They need to start another show, namely Moral Responsibility...

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  48. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Morky · · Score: 1

    I say, Dr. Merkwurdigeliebe, an interesting idea you have there.

  49. Who gets voted into space? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, 19 year old TV middle-ish attractive chick who whines alot. We've decided that for the greater good you have to bail. You can take it two ways. Either with a helmet where you slowly run out of air or no helmet and it's quick. Your call.

    Now that I would watch. What are the 5 stages of reality TV grief?

    Begging
    Figthing
    Urinating
    Yet more drama
    Hugging
    Wins a car

    1. Re:Who gets voted into space? by glebfrank · · Score: 1
      What are the 5 stages of reality TV grief?

      Begging
      Figthing
      Urinating
      Yet more drama
      Hugging
      Wins a car

      I'm assuming that this is a reworking of the old joke: There are only three kinds of people in this world - those that can count, and those that can't.
    2. Re:Who gets voted into space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends if you count winning a car as grief. (But then hugging messes it up too..)

  50. Are they really gullible? by dmt99 · · Score: 1

    If you tell someone that there is the existence of a gravity generator, is that so far fetched? It seems like everything they have told these people might be at least slightly believable to anyone who isnt in the science field.

  51. Gravity generators. Uhh huh. by RomulusNR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dammit, if I wanted to watch idiots being fooled by a large corporation, couldn't I just go to the mall?

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    1. Re:Gravity generators. Uhh huh. by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      It's even easier. You just need to turn on C-SPAN.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    2. Re:Gravity generators. Uhh huh. by Xarius · · Score: 1

      Or the whitehouse...

      --
      C17H21NO4
  52. Science? by Bezben · · Score: 1

    From what I've heard all the people on it are more interested in being famous and on tv than going into space. Your usual loud, annoying and incredibly talentless fare. I refuse to watch any reality tv.

  53. Perhaps they are SMART after all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would bet they know it's all fake, but are going along with the joke. Most "reality TV" applicants are not just John and Jane Public. They are attention-whores who want to get on TV, usually people who are dying to be actors. So they will lie as needed to reach their goal.

  54. all fun and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all fun and games until the episode where they stage a Columbia style 'accident' and two of the tourists die of a heart attack while warning sirens blare.

    Then it's freaking hilarious.

  55. This practically writes itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (from the 'Cadet Profiles')

    Andrew is also scared of moths.

    Billy does not believe in ghosts but claims to have seen an alien.

    She [Sara-Jane] also dislikes bees, big wild animals, cockroaches, creepy crawlies, rodents, sharks and snakes.

    Let's see... space moths. Check. Aliens. Check. Bees. Check. Let the fun begin.

  56. The best episode by Solr_Flare · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will be the one where one of the tourists gets ejected into space but manages to hold his breath long enough to make it back inside. Also, thankfully, the gravity generators work outside the ship.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  57. And if it ran windows by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    They would run for the space suits when they saw the Windows BSOD displayed on the window.

  58. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least they're making fun of their stupid people, we tend to put our morons on pedestals.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  59. According to TFA... by vishbar · · Score: 1
    "When the cadets look out of the cockpit window, they'll see a distant earth, thanks to meticulous visual effects."

    From the About the Show page. These people must really be dumb...
    --
    Ride the skies
  60. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Many American reality shows and even the concept of reality tv are borrowed from Great Britain.

    I take minor solace in knowing no American was stupid enough to think up the concept of reality TV.

  61. Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Informative
    They aren't experiencing weightlessnes due to a combination of being in a low orbit (rather than outer space where the wightlessnes is)

    No. Gravity is everywhere. The "weightlessness" is an artifact of being in an orbit. The Earth is pulling you down, but you are also moving perpendicular to the Earth's surface, so the ground falls away from you with the curve of the Earth. It's free fall. You just fall continuously over the horizon. It's falling with style, to quote Buzz Lightyear. ;-)

    Build a stationary tower with it's top floor at the level of a space orbit, and you'll just feel the Earth's gravity.

    That's how the shuttle gets back down. They do a burn to cut their velocity and start falling toward the Earth instead of over the horizon. Such is the way of all orbits. Move faster to get to a higher orbit. Move slower to get to a lower orbit.

    1. Re:Wow! by cnettel · · Score: 1

      While gravity plates are an everyday physical reality?

    2. Re:Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      While gravity plates are an everyday physical reality?

      Uhhh.... no. I was addressing Taco's orbital weightlessness theory. Where did I even imply the gravity plates are real?

    3. Re:Wow! by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I believe the whole point of Taco's text was: this is how they were explaining it away. Even a 5 year old knows "astronauts float." When the cast asks "umm, like, why aren't we floe-ting?" They say "oh because we're not high enough and our plates do the rest (snicker snicker snicker)."

    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah everybody understands that. That's the whole point.

    5. Re:Wow! by merlin_jim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Build a stationary tower with it's top floor at the level of a space orbit, and you'll just feel the Earth's gravity.

      Actually, not true. As you move away from the center of the earth, the speed of a circular free falling orbit approaches ground speed of the earth's rotation.

      Space elevators capitalise on this. So do geosynchronous sattelites.

      If you built a stationary tower on the equator and the top floor was at GEO, you would be weightless. In fact, when they build such a thing, it will be a bit higher than that; higher than GEO and you experience acceleration AWAY from earth. The space elevator will capitalise on this, using tension to hold the elevator in balance (rather than resting on the crust of the earth)

      If you built such a tower anywhere else on earth you would experience precession directly - the only force you would feel would be due to the fact that your orbit isn't circular - your "weight" would no longer be attracted to the earth beneath your feet, but rather towards the equator.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    6. Re:Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      You're right. I was thinking of a stationary point with respect to the bulk of the Earth and thought "tower". End of year burn out is my only excuse. :)

    7. Re:Wow! by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Funny

      If two science fiction nerds on slashdot can get confused about orbital mechanics, who can blame idiots on reality tv?

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    8. Re:Wow! by affliction · · Score: 1

      I guess your sarcasmograph needs some adjustment.

    9. Re:Wow! by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Do you get a buzz from being a pedant? Because the rest of us were over here enjoying life.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    10. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad *somebody* was able to figure this out. Thanks.

    11. Re:Wow! by swiftstream · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, assuming a circular orbit, you have to move faster when you are in a lower orbit, while a higher orbit is slower.

      See e.g. http://www.freemars.org/jeff/speed/

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    12. Re:Wow! by yo303 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Build a stationary tower with it's top floor at the level of a space orbit, and you'll just feel the Earth's gravity.

      Actually, not true.
      The GP is correct.

      If you built a tower at LEO (low earth orbit) and stood at the top you would definitely feel gravity... pretty much the same gravity as on the surface, as you are not that much higher up, compared to the Earth's radius.

      It is only if you built a tower to the height of a geosynchronous orbit (far, far higher) that you would feel weightless. And this is only because the (apparent, I know) centrifugal force of the rotation of the earth. On a non-rotating earth, you could never build a tower high enough to escape Earth's gravity.

      Or put another way, on one of the Earth's poles you could never build a tower high enough to escape Earth's gravity. Even one the height of a geosynchronous orbit.

      yo.

    13. Re:Wow! by m50d · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, those of us here laughing at the contestant do actually know.

      --
      I am trolling
    14. Re:Wow! by sirket · · Score: 1

      "It's free fall. You just fall continuously over the horizon. It's falling with style, to quote Buzz Lightyear. ;-)"

      I'd like to think of it as falling and forgetting to hit the ground :)

      -sirket

    15. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as changing orbits, this is done in two stages. You slow down first (increasing the ellipticity of your orbit) and when you reach apogee you speed up.

    16. Re:Wow! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      If you were enjoying life so much, why did my post bother you? Sorry, I thought this place was to discuss geeky crap.

      People have gotten really sensitive around here lately.

    17. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 27000 mile high tower? hmmm...quite a stretch. A space elevator would have to be > 27000 miles in length to be functional. Thats like going around the world in an elevator. Better put in a portapotty!

  62. Far out man... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Anyone got any dehydrated ice cream?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  63. Who is really more gullible? by twifosp · · Score: 1
    Who is really more gullible? The dumb blokes who didn't know the basic concepts of space flight and low earth orbit?

    Or the dumb blokes who watch reality TV show actually thinking those are real people?

    1. Re:Who is really more gullible? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Or the dumb blokes who watch reality TV show actually thinking those are real people?

      There's someone earlier in the comments section who linked to a blog where somebody points out that 2 of the 3 contestants are ACTORS! He even has a picture of one of them from a commercial.

      Have you read the bios of the contestants on the website? They're insane!

      I love the idea. This has touches of Andy Kauffman-level genius at messing with the audience for entertainment. If I had cable, I'd be watching right now to see how they let the audience know they'd been had, 'cause THAT'S going to be fun.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  64. Re:Wtf?! by grimJester · · Score: 1

    On a more positive note, I think you'd be great on this show.

  65. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    >without GCSE's

    this has got to be a typo, surely, "with up to 14 recent GCSE's" is more relevant

  66. "low orbit" by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 4, Funny

    low orbit (rather than outer space where the wightlessnes is)

    It's a little known fact, but this is why things always fall off the bottom of the moon.

    1. Re:"low orbit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this was mildly ridiculous - "zero-gravity" like astronauts in orbit experience has nothing to do with distance from a massive object/planet - it's about freefall, not gravity, and it could happen in low orbit, geosync orbit, ground level, or the center of the earth, right?

    2. Re:"low orbit" by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      I think we're getting into General Relativity territory now. You experience zero-gravity when there is no gravity (because you're nowhere near any mass) or when you're in free fall around a mass in an environment where it's the only mass close enough for you to feel its gravity. Inside of a windowless box you wouldn't be able to tell the difference (I think). We experience gravity now even though we are in free fall around the sun (which itself is in free fall around the center of the galaxy. That's because we're near the mass of the earth. Zero gravity is the default state. That's what you would have in an empty universe. Add some mass and you have gravity. Travel far enough from the earth without getting too close to anything else and you have free fall around the sun. But, travel to the empty space in between galaxies and you are weightless due to lack of mass, not due to free fall.

  67. They're all fscking actors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole thing is a retarded TV con, one of the supposed contestant / victims - not the one who is officially undercover for the program - but a supposed 'reality' TV entrant is currently appearing in a Blood Donor advert, they are all actors - it is a sub-Jerry Springer farce.

  68. In Soviet Britain... by ettlz · · Score: 1

    ..Space Race rides you!

  69. Better idea by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they be voted out the airlock? I'd pay to watch that.

    1. Re:Better idea by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

      I can't understand how the "astronauts" could be fooled, let alone the audience!

  70. Re:Wtf?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to have missed the joke.

  71. not so stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each of the contestants gets £5000 A DAY they're on the show...

  72. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or in the White House....

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  73. Reminds me of the WB's "Superstar"... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    I haven't felt as horrified about a TV show's premise since the WB's Superstar from a couple of years ago. On the rare moment when I did watch I literally looked at the TV through my fingers in a pathetic attempt to appease my conscience. Oh it was funny, even hilarious, but I felt bad the entire time watching otherwise good people used as comedic cannon fodder. I stopped watching after the second episode when I had friends walk out of the room in disgust.

    Something tells me though that all is not as it appears with this new show and it may end up being a hoax on the viewer when we find out that the astronauts are really actors playing a part. Who knows?

  74. The ultimate reality TV show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pinnacle of this genre will be when they get together a bunch of uncreative and obnoxious producers that put together strings of increasingly offensive and contrived shows and see just what the stupid viewing public will put up with while making the producers obscenely wealthy. I predict it will be a long running series.

  75. Are they really that stupid? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody seems to think that these people are really stupid. But firstly, I think people on slashdot are into technology, and therefore know what is and isn't possible. Also, these people have no reason not to believe the producers aren't telling them the truth. The Milgram Experiment show that people will do stuff that they don't want to do, just because some guy in a white suit says that they should. I believe this shows that people are going to believe the guy in the white suit, even if what he says is a little far fetched.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Are they really that stupid? by PeterAitch · · Score: 1

      Indeed - the 'participants' were carefully chosen for their social conformity and suggestibility. This is in contradistinction to nerds like me, who are more likely to be verging on the asocial. It's strange to watch people who don't really seem to process any physical or sensory data; although the capsule's sound system is probably highly convincing, the remainder of the illusion seems unbelievably amateurish. All this, of course, without even getting into the physics.
      Still, it rather looks as if one, or perhaps two, of the three 'marks' may have 'better' (certainly more lucrative) jobs than mine. A strong technical background is not highly regarded here in the UK, so most viewers won't be outraged at the lack of scientific savvy shown throughout the 'mission'.
      Overall, an unsurprisingly unedifying experience. Bring back the Star Trek re-runs, please!

  76. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by lucky130 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Technically speaking, all objects are gravity generators :).

  77. I hate mean spirited humor by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    This is even worse than the one where took all these wannabee performers with no talent and let them to believe they did. It's just plain mean.

    For this show, wouldn't it be a better idea to create a totally immersive virtual environment where, say, 5 person crews operate and live-aboard a virtual "starship". Teams could compete against each other from within this virtual world while actually living on the set the entire time. Of course, it would all be understood that this is a simulation.

    I could be a very popular show, and it would promote teamwork instead of "laughing at the dupes".

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  78. dumb, dumb, DUMB by Tiredoflurkin · · Score: 1

    This is just several kinds of stupid, all at once.

  79. No, we haven't... by vishbar · · Score: 5, Informative

    We're still holding on strong. The whole thing, including the cadets, is a huge hoax on us, the viewers. Though the brits fell for this one too, so we'll call it even.

    --
    Ride the skies
    1. Re:No, we haven't... by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      A scripted reality TV show??? You just rocked my world...

    2. Re:No, we haven't... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Google for "Joe Schmoe". It was on Spike.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:No, we haven't... by dcollins · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's some pretty good sleuthing. However, I think it's true that most reality show participants & game show contestants are in actuality actors looking to bulk up their demo reel. The shows identify them with some other (possibly their part-time gig) job to not make it so obvious that everyone is a wannabe actor.

      So it still could possibly go either way.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    4. Re:No, we haven't... by jbooker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. Sorry, and I know that as a Brit my opinion is biased, but if you'd read the article you'd know that the thing has been *advertised* AS A HOAX. The 'cadets' are being hoaxed, for the entertainment of television viewers (in much the same way as thousands of hopeful people are invited to audition for 'pop' reality shows, and ridiculed in front of the country by showing people who really can't sing for the enjoyment of the public, occasionally throwing in one which does have talent for the sake of credibility)

      My point is, the british public hasn't been hoaxed, since the program's been entirely advertised as a hoax since day one, as from the article:

      "[Space Cadets] ... is blasting a group of adventurers, ordinary members of the public, off into space to spend five days orbiting the earth. It's thrilling, it's exciting, and it's totally bogus. "

      Note the word bogus.

      If you want to settle scores, then I'm afraid the US is still in the lead, with William Shatner's "Invasion Iowa" which was an attempt to trick an entire town in Iowa into thinking aliens had landed. As I've not got around to watching any of this yet, I can't comment on its success.

      --
      Very funny scotty, now beam down my clothes
    5. Re:No, we haven't... by vishbar · · Score: 1

      If you couldn't tell, I was being sarcastic about the whole "British v. US" stupidity contest.

      Plus, if you couldn't tell, the point of the linked article was that the actual CONTESTANTS were fake as well, not just the premise of the show. The show was advertised AS A HOAX, but the point is that the show isn't a hoax on the contestants--rather, it's a hoax on the viewers. Assuming that you are British, then I guess this adds another point into the British stupidity meter :).

      --
      Ride the skies
    6. Re:No, we haven't... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How is it a hoax on the viewer if we know it's fake anyway? If it's a hoax on the viewer they'd be trying to get us to think it was real.

    7. Re:No, we haven't... by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Rather than "unknowns," the contestants are actors as well. Read the great-great-grandparent's linked article.

      --
      Ride the skies
    8. Re:No, we haven't... by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I forgot to include the tag.

      I'd be willnig to bet there are far more scripted reality shows there than has been publically admitted / accepted. I won't go as far as to say they all are, but...i think you get my point.

    9. Re:No, we haven't... by Xain · · Score: 0

      That's hardly great evidence that the hoax is on us. Wouldn't the sort of people who audition for this be the sort to also give acting a go? Is appearing in a Give Blood ad going to make the scottish guy give up the day job? That's what the article is suggesting. Also, the performers site for the girl does nothing to suggest she's anything but a wannabe, which is exactly the sort of "normal people" that go on reality shows.

    10. Re:No, we haven't... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      that's a questionable source. also, it's quite possible that most applicants to reality tv shows are aspiring actors or people who are trying to make there way into the entertainment industry. and being an actor doesn't necessarily make you smart, or not stupid.

    11. Re:No, we haven't... by bani · · Score: 5, Informative

      The hoax is that the british public believes that the participants are unaware of the hoax.

      as pointed out, the participants are really actors, and the hoax is on you.

    12. Re:No, we haven't... by ozric99 · · Score: 1
      So, to recap, the fake show is actually a fake show because the fake contestants are actually fake contestants.

      I'm glad we got that sorted. ;)

      In other news, Channel 4 announce record losses...

    13. Re:No, we haven't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still holding on strong. The whole thing, including the cadets, is a huge hoax on us, the viewers. Though the brits fell for this one too, so we'll call it even.

      If I recall correctly, Ryan McBride did say he was an electrician but that "he had bigger plans"... or something like that. So maybe he is a wannabe actor?

      And perhaps "Keri Hassett" just happens to look a little bit like the contestant called Keri.

      Thus.... maybe you shouldn't be quite so cocky! ;)
      You are treating the evidence of a single random website, as absolute hard fact. It may transpire that it is indeed correct and the whole thing is fooling the viewer, but my money is on this not being the case.

    14. Re:No, we haven't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may transpire that it is indeed correct and the whole thing is fooling the viewer, but my money is on this not being the case.

      If the supposedly-ignorant contestants are actually in the know, I doubt it will be revealed within the show. If these people were hired to act unawares, it was probably only due to concern that the concept of the show might not work in real life.

    15. Re:No, we haven't... by jbooker · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm happy to wear the dunce hat on this one - I didn't catch the show, and didn't realise it was a double-whammy hoax of a hoax on the people who thought it was a hoax on the peo..........

      AUGH. you all win. :)

      --
      Very funny scotty, now beam down my clothes
  80. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having lived in both the UK and US for extended periods, I have to disagree with you. Both influence each other and neither is the sole source from which culture flows. Case in point, I was rather suprised to see Kenny Rogers have a number one song in the UK charts when I was there in the eighties.

    -AC

  81. Where can I get by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Where can I get one of those gravity generators? I wanted to embed one in my shoes so I can work out all day. Then put one in my apartment so can increase gravity both an an exercise program and anti-theft system.

    1. Re:Where can I get by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The best place to install a gravity generator is in the ceiling, though it may cause some lightheadedness.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  82. Huge smoke cloud by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 1

    Explain the huge smoke cloud? Why explain it? It's obviously the engine exhaust from their takeoff.

  83. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    We must act immediately to close the Stupid Gap!

    I assume you mean "Stupidity Gap".

  84. Excellent UK forum to get yourselves up to speed. by TAZ6416 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For all non-UK Slashdotters, this forum will bring you up to speed on what has been happening in the last week. - http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/forumdisplay.p hp?f=139

    I usually hate reality TV shows, but this one has me hooked, maybe because we have done the fantasic ATX http://www.kennedyspacecenter.com/visitKSC/atx.asp so some of the training looked familiar and it brought back some happy memories.

    BTW, they are either the stupidest people ever.. or brilliant actors.

    Jonathan

    Oscar The Grouch Does California, Nevada & Arizona - http://www.mccormackj.fsnet.co.uk/oscarthegrouch

  85. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

    Actually, "gravity generators" do exist - stuff that exerts centrifugal force. ;) So, if the ship was rotating, the hull would technically be "under floor"... so there go your "gravity generators".

    --
    "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
  86. Funnier will be Season 2... by Pr3d4t0r · · Score: 1

    ...where the producers assure the participants that this time they really will be going space. Honest, really.

    Psych!

  87. We had the monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they already had us beat with that show where the guy wears a clown wig and runs around kicking people in the balls

    "my friend, youve just been kicked in the balls"
    *victum begins laughing*

    oh yea right its funny now..

    "dumbest show ever"

  88. The real truth of Gravity Generators by catmistake · · Score: 1
    people who are stupid enough to believe that 'gravity generators' exist

    Every thing generates gravity.

    If they didn't exist, neither would gravity.

  89. "The Marching Morons" by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is just the beginning P.R. for a plan like the one described in Kornbluth's classic story "The Marching Morons".

    I wonder if the soap-root is indeed 'soapy'...

    Its past time for this, IMHO.

  90. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by jeffy210 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You obviously haven't seen any Japanese game shows....

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  91. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by lbmouse · · Score: 0

    Better quote from site:

    Entering the Kingdom of Uranus
    The Cadets find their entrance into the Kingdom of Uranus to be a very moving experience.


    So maybe this whole thing is not idiocy, just harmless hilarity.

  92. Double Hoax by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The conspiracy theory is that the "cadets" know the show is fake, and the hoax is actually on the audience. It seems hard to believe that 3 people could really be this gullible, but I suppose if they're carefully fed information, who knows...

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    1. Re:Double Hoax by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      People can be amazingly gullible. Brass Eye demonstrated this. They got famous celebrities and politicians to say all sorts of things. e.g. Paedophiles have more in common with crabs than humans. There is a new drug called "Cake" (and they had some cake crumbs in a bag to demonstrate this). One MP asctually raised a question about it in the house of commons. And how many people have fallen for the most ludicrous of April fools?

    2. Re:Double Hoax by RichardX · · Score: 1

      here is a new drug called "Cake" (and they had some cake crumbs in a bag to demonstrate this).

      Cake crumbs? Oh, dearie me, no.. if only they had fallen for anything so reasonable.
      They didn't just present the well intentioned celebs with mere crubs, but a luminous yellow pill approximately the size of a small child's head. And the campaign was run on behalf of the anti-drug groups "F.U.K.D" and "B.O.M.B.D", who's logo was a line of dead babies impaled on a syringe.
      They had Bernard Manning outraged at the fact that one poor sod had cried all the water out of his own body on this stuff, and a girl had puked up her own thighbone (or possibly pelvis, can't remember) - Rolf Harris warned us of a side effect known as Czech Neck, where the neck swells up so big with water retention that it engulfs the entire head, causing suffocation... and we were even told that some kids had been brained by saucepans used to make the stuff being thrown out of tower block windows.

      and that's not to even mention the slag "street" names for the stuff, including "Brummicide", "Chronic Basildon Donuts", "Joss Eckland's Spunky Backpack", and "Hattie Jaques' Pretentious Cheese Wig", or the microblip music.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  93. So...... by John+Frink · · Score: 1

    Do they have to watch B-movies and crack jokes, then come up with a new invention every week?

    --
    Who is this Jimmy character, and why was he cracking corn in the first place?
  94. The only girl in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asked what it was like being the only girl on the Shuttle, she replied, "It's horrible! I really needed to do a number two this morning but I'm really aware there are five guys outside that can hear and smell everything."

    Keri thought the situation wouldn't bother the guys too much, as they tend to revel in matters of the bottom.

    However, that was the only issue with being the only lass. "I enjoy the lads' company. I wouldn't mind a girly chat, but I'm not complaining."

    "I don't mind being the only girl with five guys and some of my friends say I like man attention, so..." she added.

  95. Re:Wtf?! by blork101 · · Score: 1
    Reality shows prove again that stupidity is the core audience.


    Apparantly it is. The core audience of Slashdot, I mean. If you'd RTFA (or even paid attention to the summary), you would have realised that that is the explanation given to the participants in the show, not the public. And is it really that hard to believe people will accept it? The large majority of people still believe a heavier object will fall faster than a light one.
    Anyway, I've been watching the show, and it's by far the best "reality TV" I've seen (maybe doewn to Johnny Vaughn's presance, actually). And the poor people being conned? They get to be on TV, get advertising deals, have had a great experince, as well as getting paid £5000 a day for their time in space.

  96. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    I don't think the creation of "reality" tv is something anyone should be proud of.

    I'm happy to disavow any knoweldge of or claim any credit for the horrific crap that is reality tv

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  97. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We must act immediately to close the Stupid Gap!"

    I assume you mean "Stupidity Gap".

    Yes, apparently it's worse than we thought.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  98. Not just there by Stumbles · · Score: 1
    Hmmm, under floor gravity generators. Not encountered any of those.

    However, I have been close up to bar gravity generators. Oddly though, there was always one area on it's surface that never worked and just always happened to be where a double Bacardi and Coke was sitting.

    Curiously that area always seemed to be where I happened to place my glass. I don't know if there is some anti-gravity aspect to glass. But needless to say, after N+1 of those and the gravity field would always flux so that it caused me to fall off the barstool.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  99. Scenes from the show by donutface · · Score: 1

    You can watch direct scenes at http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsite s/S/spacecadets/ one of the best scenes of the week was this one (no signup required for link below) http://www.channel4.com/player/playerwindow.html?i d=d04_1012_minsky_lecture&vert=spacecadets The guy thats trying dead hard not to laugh was actually an actor, they placed 3 actors in the group in order to influence the rest of them a bit in the right direction.

  100. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

    my favourite one has a guy strapped to a bungie cord on a catapult, and his clothes are firmly attached to the catapult itself, so that if he gets catapulted while attached to a bungie cord, his clothes stay on the catapult base.

    his partner has to answer trivia questions, and three wrong answers and the other guy gets catapulted.

    that's what I love the most about the Japanese.

  101. Alien Exploding chest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Na mate
    You want an "Alien" chest exploader.

    Now that I would pay to see :-)

  102. And they crash... by gQuigs · · Score: 1

    The scariest time will be when all of the windows crash with BSODs.

  103. Sorry, THIS is the best quote... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    When tasked with the highly difficult job of blowing up a balloon for science, one of the "crew" had a problem...

    "Keri told Capcom she couldn't see any instructions on animals.

    "Have you taken the instructions out of the envelope?" asked Capcom.

    She had not."

    *sigh*

  104. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new space fairing underlords.

  105. Now Taking Bets by FourStarGeneral · · Score: 1

    $1 gets you in the pool, start bidding on how long this farce is going to last. I'll put money on half a season, anyone else care to wager?

    --
    Resistance... is futile.
  106. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

    So I'm wondering, how easily could we get green cards for highly talented British individuals with astronaut training and TV experience?

  107. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

    Look at this gem: "Keri had been concerned to see debris falling from the earth. "I thought it was space junk but Drew said it was ice." Am I reading this right, did she believe that crap falling off the fake earth was ice?

  108. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by dougmc · · Score: 1
    stuff that exerts centrifugal force
    Though technically that's not gravity, though it's a reasonable approximation.

    But there's some differences too. For example, the `gravity' at your head would be less than the gravity at your head, which is true on the Earth too, but the effect would be much much larger -- large enough that you might notice it. And if you were to jump straight up off the floor, your path up would not appear to be a straight line. Apparantly people's inner ears can tell the difference too, which I guess might explain how spinning things at the circus make you puke :)

    But sure, if people think there's gravity because they're in `low Earth orbit' (when in fact as long as you're in orbit, you feel practically no gravity, no matter how low your orbit is) then I guess they won't be looking for those subtle effects. The ISS is only 200 miles up -- it's hard to get in a lower altitude than that above the Earth and actually stay there for any length of time -- and the astronauts float around just fine :)

    Still, the whole thing sounds like a stunt, like the people MUST know they're not actually in space. Could they just be actors? Is this the new Joe Schmoe? If not, I really feel sorry for them when they `land' -- the whole world will know just how naive they are.

  109. It IS a fake! ??? by Mungkie · · Score: 1

    Channel 4 seems to come up with the most awful spirited programming, I don't know why? maybe it's what the yoof of today want?.

    But I guess this program maybe a double bluff, I have not really followed the program other than when I was channel surfing the first episode where the victims were chosen. I spotted 12 actors, more actors than "victims" which did not make the grade. I cannot believe that they would audition actors without letting the viewer know, so I therefore assume that they were all actors and were paid to pretend to be gullible "victims".

    Some of these TV shows have had problems with the aftermath of these sort of twisted humiliation programs. I have heard of a suicide that was linked to this sort of TV humiliation, and I think jerry springer was linked to some murder, all sorts of law suits with that transexual miriam thing, etc....

    I cannot believe that the producers would leave themselves open to these possibilitys?

    But then again I could be wrong, I have been told there is no lower limit to human intelligence?.

  110. new reality show by SlashSquatch · · Score: 1

    Let's take three tv show producers and put them alone on the Mir space station.
    Leave them there for six months to solve "real problems" like leaks, power outages
    and other life threatening shit. Then save the return trip cash because those
    assholes are frozen corpses.
    The highlight of the film is when they realize they can't fix anything and are
    sure to die. Then through the intercom the announcement for the spectacularly low
    ratings arrives.

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
  111. I'm watching this right now by MountainMan101 · · Score: 1

    I just put the show on (it's live on E4).

    One of the 4 is American and was eulogising on the power of the human brain.

    The girl has just said "I lived in Birmingham all my life, until I was 17".

    A bloke says "I waited until I was 22 before I met my wife"

    It's pretty obvious these people are as thick as the proverbial 2 short blanks. Watching one of them explaining about G-forces in a fighter plane while not noticing they are in a wooden "space ship" was very funny.

    1. Re:I'm watching this right now by AddressException · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious these people are as thick as the proverbial 2 short blanks.
      Mr kettle, will you accept a call from a Mr. Pot?

    2. Re:I'm watching this right now by MountainMan101 · · Score: 1

      Ha! I didn't spot the typo until I typed "thick as two short blanks" into Google. It's been one fo those days. Watching someone explain the effect of moving at high speed to another whilst sat inside a wooded box that's vibrating is real comedy. Shame I missed the whole "computers vs humans" debate - would have been interesting especially as my laptop is quite capable of telling when it's accelerating.

  112. They're not laughing with you... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody should found a religion like that. I'd join.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  113. Imaginary Space Cowboys by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    I guess mods think that this story became much more interesting now than it used to be back on nov 21 when I first submitted it...or perhaps my title was not catchy enough.

  114. Message to Tookey Williams... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are there really little ghouls with pitchforks and lots of fire there?

  115. Make the Earth Shatter in front of their faces by madshot · · Score: 1

    I vote for making the Earth shatter in front of their faces and then cut all communications to the spaceship. Let see how long it takes them to f**k like rabits because they are the only human beings alive.

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
    1. Re:Make the Earth Shatter in front of their faces by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      Plus we need vampires stalking the corridors, terrorists on the bridge, and Raquel Welch in the engine room. (The Brits have done this before. Peter Sellers and Ringo Starr took a bunch of unsuspecting passengers for a ride in an ocean liner in "The Magic Christian".)

    2. Re:Make the Earth Shatter in front of their faces by timothv · · Score: 1

      That would be exactly like Odyssey 5.

  116. Its not astronaut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its Euronaut.

  117. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm - judicious use of quote marks makes your statement meaningless. Toss in a wink - and you might as well not hit the Submit button. There's no such force at "Centrifugal" - it is correctly known as "Centripetal" force. It doesn't have anything to do with gravity. But it would allow the study of the corresponding Coriolis force with ease.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  118. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative


        Two points to the winner! :)

        I'm surprised no one else had said it..

        Now, where exactly would they find something of sufficent mass and density to simulate 1G on something the size of the space shuttle? They wouldn't, and actually be able to move it. :)

        But hey, if they want to believe, they will.

        When I was a kid, I went to Space Academy at the Huntsville Space and Rocket center, twice. It was fun. It was geared more towards beginners, but still, it was fun.

        Someone else linked This Page, which shows that the folks in the simulation aren't regular kids being fooled. They're actors being paid to act like they believe the whole thing.

        The simulation sounds really cool though, if it's as realistic as their site portrays.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  119. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they have attached a huge multi million ton weight under the spaceship to get artificial gravity. :)

  120. Fake reality show by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about this show and have never seen it, but I think it would be funny if this whole reality show turned out to be fake. That way, at the end of the whole thing, after the viewers have laughed and gasped at these people's 'stupidity' and at all the crazy and tragic things that have happened, the actors and producers can stop and announce, "This whole thing is fake" and laugh at the viewers. I don't know enough about the show, but it certainly would not surprise me to hear that something like this was all staged, with actors playing stupid.

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  121. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    No more so than Britain and Europe at large are culturally reactive to America.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  122. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by banuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Technically speaking, all objects are gravity generators :).
     
    Especially the fat american ones.

  123. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Politburo · · Score: 1

    Actually, America lost the monopoly on stupid earlier this year, when a ringtone captured the #1 spot on Britain's pop charts. That's right. A fucking ringtone.

  124. Only two things are infinite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone have a monopoly on human stupidity? Its spanned the globe as long as humans have.

    Just because America's media has always been stupid and free enough to make their stupidity an international claim to fame...

  125. Re:The joke is on... Contest Searchlight? by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    So, if this is true, then they're following in the spirit of Contest Searchlight?

    Denis Leary, and some very funny comedians parody "Project Greenlight." The scripted story follows a "reality" show, where the actors are all comedy hopefuls are creating a new show for Comedy Central. Its incredibly funny, but generally I think people didn't quite get the fact that it was *not* a real show with real people.

  126. Re:It IS a fake! ??? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Some of these TV shows have had problems with the aftermath of these sort of twisted humiliation programs. I have heard of a suicide that was linked to this sort of TV humiliation, and I think jerry springer was linked to some murder, all sorts of law suits with that transexual miriam thing, etc....

    To be fair, they do seem to have gone to great pains to make sure their victims are emotionally stable and will appreciate the joke.

  127. Ignorance is Strength!!! by rknop · · Score: 1

    They aren't experiencing weightlessness due to a combination of being in a low orbit (rather than outer space where the weightlessness is)

    Augh! I hate it when I see statements like this. This may be technically correct, but the implication is wrong.

    Astronauts even in high orbit experience weightlessnes not because they are outside of the influence of the Earth's gravitational field, but because they are in free fall.

    The Space Shuttle goes into low Earth orbit, yet the astronauts experience weightlessness. Why? Because the Shuttle is in free fall-- it is falling at a rate that exactly matches the pull of gravity, so the environment around the astronauts (the walls of the shuttle) fall at the same rate as they do. They're also in orbit-- they're falling at just the right rate so that they never hit the ground. (It's reasonably valid to think of it that they are falling towards the ground, but also moving sideways fast enough so that they get out of the way before the hit the ground.)

    -Rob

  128. Meanwhile... by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 1
    and a few under-floor gravity generators

    Meanwhile, the Russians used a pencil. Also, it's worth pointing out that they're not supposed to be in Russia, it's Kazakhstan. Admittedly, Kazakhstan was the Soviet center for space work, so it's an easy mistake to make.

  129. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least he didn't use that oh-so-girlish anime smile.

  130. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Sarlacc83 · · Score: 1

    Actually, they're just wearing really heavy boots

  131. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by burndive · · Score: 1
    "Now, where exactly would they find something of sufficent mass and density to simulate 1G on something the size of the space shuttle? They wouldn't, and actually be able to move it. :)"

    The beauty of it is that they ARE using the one object around big enough to generate a 1G gravitational field, and it is indeed beneath the floor of their craft.

    For the record, I despise reality TV, and therefore I don't watch it.

    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  132. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if thinking "rudimentaries" is a word would have un-disqualified you ...

  133. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by GoRK · · Score: 1

    Now, where exactly would they find something of sufficent mass and density to simulate 1G on something the size of the space shuttle? They wouldn't, and actually be able to move it. :)

    1G is a measure of acceleration. It is trivial to simulate 1G. Ever heard of a centrifuge? You need only lift a counterweight (which doesn't even be the same mass as the end with your fake 'gravity'), and you could probably even build a small one within the confines of the shuttle or build a pod of some sort that rings around outside the shuttle. (You would need two, actually, but that is beside the point.)

    It is not, as you probably meant, likely that we could achieve 1G of gravitational force without at least putting someone down on an object with roughly the same mass as the earth (the necessary mass would depend on the size and density distribution of course).

  134. On the other hand... by xclan · · Score: 1

    From another perspective, although making fun of people is, for some, despicable (unless the people being made fun of are American), after looking over the website and looking at the great lengths this show went to in order to convince these people that they really were going into outer space, I started to wonder about the "thrill ride" aspect of the whole experience.

    Think about it, we go to places like Cedar Point, Disney World, Universal Studios, etc, to enjoy immersive experiences. We spend billions on immersive video games like God of War, as well. There was a hit movie made about paying for someone to be "fooled" into believing they were having a spy/intriuge experience: The Game, with Michael Douglass. We pay big money for experiences all the time.

    For the time being, these guys are on the biggest thrill ride on earth. Sure, some of them may feel like chumps when it's all over, but, then again, they may just be "thrilled".

    No "suspension of disbelief" here. However, looks like the producers could only get away with this once; maybe twice. After that, everyone already knows, and so, no-one can experience the thrill of believing. How much would someone pay for a thrill ride that convinced them, for the time being, that they were actually on a space shuttle for five days?

  135. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or mod them Funny

  136. On behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to take this opportunity to note, on behalf of the British public, that the general intellectuality is far greater than those 4 individuals.

  137. Re: By making them president you mean? by dow · · Score: 2

    Dumb bumbling god fearing pig eyed hicks should not be entertained with the idea they can run countries, let alone continents. D'Oh!

    Still better than the one we got though :-(

  138. Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under-floor gravity generators?! I need one of them!

  139. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

    Well, you'll have to apologize me on that one. The translation I got from Google and Babelfish both gave me "centrifugal" (how's that for judicious use of quoting), which is quite close to the wording in my native language. I'm sure you did understand what I meant, so not all was lost (maybe bandwidth).

    And of course it does have lots of things to do with gravity. They are both forces (by definition both exert acceleration based on mass), and given a large enough radius you can use one to mimic another. As for the Coriolis force, can't see how that is related to the subject, seeing as you can't really feel it, just watch its effects (unlike gravity or a centripetal force).

    --
    "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
  140. Saw the opening by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    I saw the opening for this.. they went out of their way to pick stupid and gullible people. I mean outright "Erm.. should I run at that brick wall?" stupid. Taught them next to nothing and basicly recorded them doing it. The whole thing is "look we're idiots" basicly.

    But then these people all signedup for "a secret reality TV show", they had no idea what it was.. so they deserve all they get for being so dumb as to just want to whore themselvs on TV.

    In short : I won't be watching, I hate the concept and I don't enjoy idiots.

    --
    I like muppets.
  141. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least it's nice to be reassured that stark raving idiocy isn't an exclusively American trait. Apparently, any prospective 'astronaut' who showed even the slightest glimmer of comprehension of the rudimentaries of physics was automatically disqualified. leaving us with the pick of the litter...people who are stupid enough to believe that 'gravity generators' exist, and that exposure to 'near space' will make you shorter and increase your lung capacity.

    Other good qualification questions concern disbelief in evolution, belief that it is possible in our lifetimes to build a 'universal constructor', and near-certainty that the human race will experience a 'technological singularity' within the next 50 years.

  142. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by A+Brand+of+Fire · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In other news, American President George W. Bush announced today a new program to curtail the dwindling number of the country's morons with his new No Stupid Person Left Behind program. The President declined to comment on the diverting of funds from the No Child Left Behind and NASA spending programs to this new plan, but did state that he planned to "nip this epidemic in the bud."

    --
    [End of Line]
  143. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

    Spot on for the differences (although you could kinda get around that with a large enough radius and propper angular velocity).

    Although those might be requisites for entering a reality show, you don't really have to be dumb or stupid to believe this - just ignorant (which is really not a crime). I know tons of really bright and successful people who simply do not have any kind of formal training in physics. I don't think any of them would join a reality show though. ;)

    --
    "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
  144. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by shamino0 · · Score: 1
    stuff that exerts centrifugal force

    Though technically that's not gravity, though it's a reasonable approximation.

    Didn't Einstein prove that gravity and acceleration are interchangeable?

    ... in fact as long as you're in orbit, you feel practically no gravity, no matter how low your orbit is

    Absolutely correct. Because the phenomenon of weightlessness is, in fact, a result of being in free-fall, which all orbiting objects are.

    You can experience the exact same thing in anything else that's in free-fall, like an airplane descending at the same rate as gravity (9.81m/s^2) or some amusement park rides.

  145. Only one thing I can't figure out by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    The "set" of the shuttle is the one from Space Cowboys according to the wikipedia article. Movie sets are made from wood wich seems to be confirmed. Now I don't know much about the real shuttle but I have always presumed that it would be something like a normal aircraft. You know, not made out of plywood?

    Movie sets always have that element like in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom blooper where the huge unmovable boulder rocks at the lightest touch?

    Surely you would realize that your in a set that just doesn't feel solid enough to go up into space?

    The fact that some of the contestants have previous acting experience means nothing. Countless people sign themselves up as extra's and the kind of extroverts that would be selected for a reality show especially. Introverted nerds would not be accepted or even apply. Same reason there are no "leaked" photos of bill gates posing nude to pay his rent before he made it big (like 99% of female celebs)

    Oh well it sounds like an insane stunt yet it being the audience being fooled can't be discounted. I has been done before on the BBC where they faked a fake haunted house that turned out to be real. Or so the audience thought. I just like to know how they are going to explain the contestants never actually seeing the rocket.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  146. [all of them are actors] by n3k5 · · Score: 1

    this would mean none of the journalists reporting on this have cared to do basic fact checking. or anyone who would be in a position to confirm your theory is also an actor. of course it would be neat if the production team was able to pull that off, but how likely is that? surely it's not true that the audience _couldn't_ know they're being duped.

    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    1. Re:[all of them are actors] by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm too lazy to hunt, but above this comment there are several links to a page that confirms this. At least two of the non-actors are actors.

      Do you really think that journalists dig that deep in entertainment peices? (or any peices nowadays).

      How hard is it to dupe the average TV audience? Reality shows have a formula which they follow, based around shallow human emotions. These shallow human emotions are pretty easy to do. It wouldn't be hard to find a cast to act like petty idiots.

      This is what people expect. Why would they ever question?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  147. The Pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this, but, as I said to my friend midway through slagging off the participants and the stupidity of the show, "Who the fuck is "piloting" this thing?".

    _ANYONE_, who is stupid enough to buy that the "ship" is on autopilot is clearly a complete fucking idiot...

  148. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Battle of the Network Stars"

    1970's.

    Bzzzzt! Sorry, thanksforplayingSmithersreleasethehounds.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  149. the US version now somewhat trickier... by boxy50 · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing if Endemol go ahead and do the US version, they'll now have to add another test into the mix which checks if they read slashdot regularly...

    On the otherhand, with the ratings it's got so far in the UK, that's about as likely as them actually being in space...

  150. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Toxicgonzo · · Score: 1

    In fact, perhaps the only way this show could get any more entertaining is if the viewing public were allowed to vote on which indignity the 'astronauts' would have to suffer next.

    How about voting who to kick off the shuttle?

  151. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by CodeHog · · Score: 1

    "I was rather suprised to see Kenny Rogers have a number one song in the UK charts "
    I hear ya, I'm always surprised to see Kenny Rogers have a number one song anywhere.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  152. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
    We must act immediately to close the Stupid Gap!

    I'm afraid acting alone won't do it. We need real, live, drooling stupid people. Now, where can we find a bunch of them right away, and get them all green cards?

  153. As you say it is unlikely by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    The fact that 1 has appeared in a tv-ad and the other is on an extras page means nothing. These are extroverts. People that like to be in the limelight. Same reason almost all the celebs can usually be found to have done in their younger years stuff like tv-ads or appearing on childeren programs in the audience.

    Now if they had gone to acting school or been in some real productions of even multiple minor roles that would be something. But a single ad and an extras page. Nah, just normal for the kind of people.

    The BBC could pull a double hoax but not channel 4. To much a risk people boycott the channel in anger.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  154. Jaywalk All-stars by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Jay Leno: "What is outer space?"
    Jaywalker: "It's like, um, er, when you are high and spaced out and all"

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  155. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    That would be real, not artificial, gravity.

    Dammit, what are they teaching kids nowadays?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  156. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Aneurysm · · Score: 1

    I think you mean 'cosmonaut'

  157. IT'S A HOAX!! by The+Philosophers+Cat · · Score: 1

    Space Cadets is a hoax. The official SC website has information on each contestent. In particular "Ryan McBride" occupation is described as "electrician":
    http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsite s/S/spacecadets/cadets/ryan-mcbride.html

    However he also appears on a TV advert to give blood (near the end, you see him 3 times):
    http://www.blood.co.uk/pages/flashAdvert5S.htm

    The rumours cirulating among the illuminati is that the jokes on you! the viewers and this will be revealed on the last episode. You will be the ones who are stupid enough to think other people were stupid enough to think they were going into space :)


    1. Re:IT'S A HOAX!! by m50d · · Score: 1

      The thing is though, there are people that stupid, I've met too many of them to doubt it.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:IT'S A HOAX!! by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      wow, a non-speaking extra in an advert for a charity get paid enough to set them up for the rest of their life? damn, I better get me some of that work.

      I guess that's the only plausible explanation, since no one's ever heard of extras having any other job.

  158. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Though technically that's not gravity, though it's a reasonable approximation.

    Yes and no. IANAP, but I believe Einstein's claim was that gravity wasn't just similar to inertia, i.e. resistance to acceleration, but that they were exactly the same phenomenon. You are travelling through the 4-dimensional spacetime continuum at the speed of light (and hence, if you move faster thru space relative to something else, movement along another dimension must give, hence speed through time slows down.)

    In any case, gravity is a warpage in this 4-d spacetime continuum; you are accelerating while standing still in spacial dimensions.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  159. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by boingo82 · · Score: 1

    And technically, the shuttle occupants ARE orbiting in space..

    --
    As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
  160. Tripple bluff?? by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

    Maybe its a tripple bluff :P

  161. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or in charge of moderating technology-oriented discussion forums. . .

  162. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by rkowen · · Score: 1
    At least they're making fun of their stupid people, we tend to put our morons on pedestals.


    Yea, we call them celebrities and we throw lots of cash at them for whatever they do or say. Then they actually think that because they have this spotlight and all this fame and wealth that they have some deep profound insights that they insist on inflicting upon the lowly non-celebrity (i.e. the rest of us ... especially those who post on /. ... you know if we had lives of our own we would be too busy posting inane comments here or anywhere :P )

    --
    I hate sigs (especially yours which is a waste of my bandwidth)
  163. Rotating scenery? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    If they could project a constant impression that they are spinning, they could explain away the "gravity" as centripetal acceleration. Assuming the "ship" is big enough that you wouldn't feel a difference between the forces at your head versus the forces at your feet, I think even clueful applicants might fall for it. The question then would be if they can make a believable projection that will hold up for days or weeks, but this is certainly a doable proposition (eventually, if not now).

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  164. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Alternately, perhaps the participants know it is fake and choose not to let on. I always suspect this when I see a hypnotism show. I think many of them aren't really "under," but it's a matter of peer pressure, and "hey! I'm on stage in front of everybody!" TV exposure is valuable, and I think a lot of the "reality" shows get overwhelmed by wannabe actors who just want to parlay an appearance into a career in entertainment.

  165. Ray Bradbury's "The Rocket" short story by Krellan · · Score: 1

    I'm getting deja vu here....

    Did anybody else read Ray Bradbury's short story, "The Rocket", many years ago?

    It's the final story in his compilation novel _The_Illustrated_Man_.

    I won't give away any spoilers, but after reading this story, I feel like I don't need to watch this TV show at all. :)

  166. Not quite... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    and you could probably even build a small one within the confines of the shuttle

    You'd have excessive coriolis effects, and the gravity differential between your feet and your head would be very noticeable. You would fool no one and in fact your "passengers" would be quite ill. At that size you would probably be spinning at 6-10RPM.

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Not quite... by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Projectile vomit might have some interesting trajectories in that space, specially with the fact that there would be quite the turbulent airflow in some areas...

      --
      Sig
  167. No, as anyone who has been to the UK can tell you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Mind the Stupid Gap!

  168. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    Though technically that's not gravity, though it's a reasonable approximation.

    Technically, anything which can produce a centri-petal/fugal force ALSO exerts gravity. Massive objects, you know.

  169. sad state of education by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    This just tells us how sorry the state of education is. Artificial gravity generators? Not 0-G because their orbiting at a low altitude?

    1. Re:sad state of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once they had sold the 'astronauts' the illusion that the setup was real, they'd have suspended their critical thinking and probably would've ignored all evidence to the contrary.

      Its not so much the stupidity of the contestants but more so the fact that if you appeal to someone's vanity and their overwhelming desire to be famous then they'll happily suspend disbelief. The stupid ones here are the programme-makers, so filled with hate that they're prepared to do anything to raise a laugh/make money/make themselves feel clever.

      There are plenty of psychology experiments involving social influence & groupthink where otherwise intelligent and decent people believe and end up doing the most stupid and awful things, even killing each other- ahref=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millgram_experi mentrel=url2html-7496http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Millgram_experiment>

      Once upon a time channel 4 used to be quite decent, with groundbreaking shows and intelligent documentaries. Like most UK TV it's gone downhill, only more so.

  170. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    The Real World was around long before Big Brother, americans were just stupid enough to think of it but too stupid to actually implement it.

  171. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    even the concept of reality tv are borrowed from Great Britain.

    Example? It would have to predate the 1972 broadcast of An American Family... and even the 1992 release of MTV's "The Real World" might be tough to beat.

  172. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Pxtl · · Score: 1

    Ohh, centrifugal force is the term for the outward pulling that occurs when you spin something - the point is that said force does not exist. Rather, when spinning an object, the outer points are constantly accelerating towards the middle in order to maintain that rotation. Hence, the term is "centripetal acceleration". The "force" is the tension of the object holding everything together.

  173. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by dougmc · · Score: 1
    Yes and no. IANAP
    Physicist? I guess I might be, as I did get a degree in physics, though I don't use it much :)
    they were exactly the same phenomenon
    Yes, I know. But even so, acceleration due to attaction between two masses (which I will call gravity here) and acceleration due to being accelerated in a circle (which is often called centrifigul/centripetal force) are going to be different, different in ways that a smart person could probably detect without special equipment. Sure, they may be the same phenomena in theory (and reality), but practice the overall field will be rather different.

    If you were rotating something huge, like Niven's Ringworld, then the differences between that and the Earth's gravity would be hard to detect by a person without any special gear, but in a rotating space ship of a size that we could reasonably create today, the differences would be rather obvious, things that I've already mentioned.

    You could also create gravity on a space ship by including a floor or some other object below you that's SO massive that it creates enough gravity and attracts you down that way, but then your ship would have a mass of a small moon or so and that's not very practial (we're talking sci-fi stuff here.) And if the mass were really dense (I'm talking neutron star dense here, which would be needed to make the ship a reasonable size), the tidal forces might be noticible to a person, or how the gravity always points towards the center of the ship. Maybe -- I'd have to pull out a calculator and start working on some real numbers.

    In any event, the sort of people who believe that you do experience almost full gravity in LEO and who don't doubt the existence of `gravity generators' aren't likely to notice that absense of any of the differences in gravity that one might expect in a spaceship that generates gravity (or the illusion of gravity, depending on how you see it) in any way.

    It also makes me wonder what they're going to do with the people they vote out. Eject them from the airlock? (So far, every reality show I've ever seen has ejected somebody each week or so, a convention that Survivor started that has stayed around.)

    That would be great fun, to put somebody in the airlock, letting them think they're about to die, and then opening the door and they walk out into the sun :)

  174. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its on TV here in the UK. (in 2 minutes in fact). They're not all actors, there were a few actors mixed in with the 10 or something they started out with, just to smooth things over in case anyone started getting clever and curious. There's 1 actor (excluding the "pilots") in the "space shuttle" and the other 3 are real people thinking theyre in real space.

  175. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    We must act immediately to close the Stupid Gap!
    I assume you mean "Stupidity Gap".
    No, you know, like... Baby Gap. Except, for morons.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  176. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Well I guess artificial gravity is an oxymoron then, as any gravity would have to be "real". But some of us prefer to use the artificial moniker to distinguish between natural and man-made.

  177. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by sheppos · · Score: 1

    Taken from the Channel 4's site, a few of the TV "Adverts" the crew recorded before hand After a few stuttery starts the crew gathered to record: "Hi we're the first civilian crew on Earth Orbiter 1 and you're watching KL2, Russia's only gymnastic channel." Next up, Capcom got the crew to dance, presumably to the music in their heads, and say: "We're the crew on Earth Orbiter 1, and we're loving this funky tune." Finally, with Keri pretending to shoot Charlie, while strangling Billy at the same time, the ad friendly four recorded: "And next on KBB4, Murder She Wrote..." http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsite s/S/spacecadets/news/story.jsp?id=235

  178. Looks plausible, but... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... what would be the point?

    Why bother with the elaborate double-bluff? Why hire crappy actors - one of whom is only known as an extra from some advert, another who only appears in some catalogue of crappy actors - and try to get them to become good enough actors to maintain the pretence?

    Wouldn't it actually in the end be easier to just find some authentic idiots? God knows there are enough of them around.

    I suspect that what's happened here is that they have on their hands a collection of desperate wannabes. Reality TV can be your launchpad into the glittering world of C-list celebrity. For someone who works most of the time as an electrician and occasionally gets work as an extra in a 'Give Blood' campaign... well, it's the big opportunity to become a star, right?

    It just seems... stupid... to do it on purpose. What are they going to do? Tell the watching millions 'sorry, the whole thing has been a fake, they're all actors'? Potentially turn them all off from the entire suddenly-discredited reality TV genre and derail the gravy train? Why would they do that?

    You can do what you like to your contestants, but don't insult the public. They'll respond by not tuning in next time, and that's the last thing you want.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  179. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To close the stupid gap, you have to work from both ends of the spectrum. Duh.

  180. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by dougmc · · Score: 1
    Technically, anything which can produce a centri-petal/fugal force ALSO exerts gravity. Massive objects, you know.
    And technically, the people in space, even those in orbit, experience gravity. In practice, it's called microgravity for a reason.

    Really, if somebody thinks they're in space when they're really on a TV set, they don't need any further confusion :)

  181. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by linuxbert · · Score: 1

    cue british accent:
    all right then, Mind the gap

  182. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by carbon116 · · Score: 5, Informative
    You'd be surprised.

    I read an article about this show before it aired. They did intensive physiological tests on the contestants to ensure they chose people who were susceptible to suggestion. These people actually turned out to be of *higher* than average intelligence.

    Intelligence is not necessarily knowledge of how a spacecraft might behave. They're probably not geeks like us, so they probably have no idea of the state of space technology.

    --
    I'm too cool for a sig.
  183. common thread? by conJunk · · Score: 1

    for the final episode, they'll find out they accidentaly brought a crate full of spiders on board, and will have to find a way to eject the arachnid menace into the vaccuum!

  184. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this (-1, pedantic twit)

  185. The -real- reality TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the REAL reality TV that we'll all be laughing at will start when the show ends and the contestants sue for the damages that have been caused.

    Tune in after the show for the court sessions, because reality TV doesn't get any more real than this.

  186. Why it must be a hoax by bagsc · · Score: 1

    What convinces me that this is a hoax is that the actors are only rewarded for not breaking character, ie "not discovering the truth." If they were being fooled, it really wouldn't be fair to puish them for catching on to the joke. If any actor can not break character for 5 days straight in an absurd situation, they deserve public accolade.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  187. Twits in Space by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Keri, a college administrator, was concerned when she saw debris "falling from earth" until Drew told her it was ice.

    This is truly pathetic and mean-spirited; this "adventure" will follow these poor people the rest of their lives. It's not nice to make unwitting people the laughingstock of the world.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  188. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's not quite got over his whitespace addiction, though.

  189. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

    Not at all. Someone talking about "Artificial" gravity would usually, incorrectly, use it to mean simulated gravity, created by some other means to accelerate you or your surroundings. The most common one beeing the circle motion of a centrifuge or spacewheel, though linear acceleration or magnetism could also be used.
    I guess technically, "artificial gravity" would refer to gravity created without mass, which at the moment is kind of unpossible. Or would that be synthesized gravity?

    --
    In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  190. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont mind the gap.

  191. Not so implausible ..?! by Moflamby-2042 · · Score: 1

    Building an 'artificial gravity device' even in weightless conditions is easy if you've got a sufficiently tall room spinning at constant angular velocity. (no need to feed some fantastic new technology line to the hapless "astro-nots").

    It seems plausible to simulate convincingly to most everybody a launch and orbit under fake-spinning room artificial gravity.

    Consider faking this with a nicely decorated cardboard exterior capsule. You load the poor rubes into a capsule. You've gone over all of the stages above with them. You shut the doors to the outside, provide fake video feeds inside of 'travel to the launch site'. Meanwhile outside the prod. crew rips the fake cardboard off the outside and carts the 'capsule' via pickup truck to a field somewhere. Attaches it to the modified carnival ride centrifuge so the back are toward ground and feet away from direction of angular acceleration. The whole 'capsule' is on pivots so the "back" direction follows the changing gravity vector.

    Now if the centrifuge angularly accelerates slowly enough then the temporary force against the feet (during angular acceleration only) is possibly unnoticeable (any shaking of the capsule can further disorient). Spin 'er up. Then slow it down, shake some more, say "Congratulations on the terrific launch, you're in free fall orbit now but due to a few experiments (...), we regret we must maintain earth level gravity at all times."

    Poke it with sticks to simulate various 'space junk collisions' w/ dust. Video footage of Earth below/above/wherever, stars around, the moon etc. I'm not sure how to simulate even part of the reduced return trip without a drop off a nearby cliff or something though :/

    I think it would be very hard for anybody to tell the difference with enough care put into the simulation.

  192. Actually, YOU'RE the idiot... by BTWR · · Score: 1
    If they are stupid enough to believe that 'low orbit has gravity' or in 'gravity generators' then I'm all for mocking/teasing them.

    Funny you should mock these "idiots," when you're the one who is fact the ignorant one.

    I'm being technical here, but only because you were such an elitist prick. So, FYI... there are such things as gravity generators, and low-orbit DOES have gravity. This paper clip in my hand generates gravity. This mouse i'm using generates gravity. The sun that warms my house generates gravity. And... low orbit DOES have gravity. Since the Sun still has a pull on anything in low-earth orbit, then there is actually gravity in low-orbit. Mock those who you call "ignorant," and you'll only be found to be a fool yourself. You asked for it (in the italicized clip above).

    1. Re:Actually, YOU'RE the idiot... by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      We are in orbit around the Sun as well.... If you are in orbit you are in freefall... you don't know anything at all about this... and no there aren't gravity generators, the paperclip in your hand has mass and therefore a gravitational pull. However, in order to 'generate' enough gravity to keep you walking around , that paperclip would have to have a mass about the same as the entire earth. I'm not sure, but I don't think that that is the sort of gravity generator I was denying existed. Perhaps they did tell these tv show people that they strapped an earth-size paperclip or computer mouse to the bottom of their space ship, but wouldn't that make them even dumber to believe it?

  193. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 1

    ... but we do have a patent for it on the way.

  194. Re:America's lost its monopoly on stupidity by eonlabs · · Score: 1

    But we can't elect Bush a 3rd time.

    --
    I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  195. not the first backlash.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    You apparently never saw the Joe Schmo show.

    There was only one non-actor on the whole show. The joke was on him.

    You're right, this show is different in that the joke is on the audience. But it's far from the first show to riff on Reality TV.

    Didn't that show (or at least idea) with Shatner going to Iowa to pretend to film a movie precede this (Invasion Iowa) too?

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  196. Not a very good joke by sneakers563 · · Score: 1
    Except that's not a very good joke is it? "Look! You were all stupid enough to believe that these people were stupid! HAHAHA!"

    Big deal. In fact, it seems like an exceptionally weak punch line to me. Would even a single viewer feel stupid for mistakenly believing that someone else is stupid? I don't think so. The whole point of a prank is to get someone to believe something crazy. Is it crazy to think that a bunch of strangers are stupid?

    I can think of a much better joke: find a bunch of people so stupid they think they've been launched into space. Now that's funny.

  197. I don't see what the big deal is by Jon+Luckey · · Score: 1

    All the producers had to do was borrow that anti-gravity generator the makers of the Bailey's Irish Cream "Weightless Bar" commercial used.

    Then they'd be able to fool everyone! :)

    --
    -- 3 events that reshaped the world in the 20th century: WW1, WW2, and WWW
  198. Gravity Generators by Botia · · Score: 1

    people who are stupid enough to believe that 'gravity generators' exist

    'Gravity generators' do exist. They range in size from the extremely small (smaller than the tip of a pin) to the extremely large (bigger than a Volkswager. In fact, almost everything I have contains a gravity generator of one sort or other. The gravity generators often go unnoticed as they are relatively weak. I heard a scientist talking about these 'gravity generators' at one point. He refered to them as mass. I told him I wasn't Catholic.

    Please note, this is my humble attempt at humor.

  199. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by JWSmythe · · Score: 1



        Everphilski's reply is right about the ring inside the shuttle, even if you built it in the cargo bay. You couldn't make it large enough to do much good.

        The counterweight idea is interesting, but that's going to be one heavy weight, and one strong cable. The orbiter weighs 240,000 pounds. This could be compensated by a long cable, and a lighter weight, but even still it would have to be one heavy freakin' weight. And they'd still need enough fuel to move the orbiter in a circle, plus start the weight spinning at the desired rotational speed. I don't think the orbiter has a single mount point strong enough to hold the full 240,000 pounds, and it wouldn't be safe to settle into a sling, because they'd end up crushing the heat tiles.

        If they wanted a 1G environment in space, I think the smartest thing to do would be to find something already floating around (old large mission parts), and attach a pressurized area to it. That would be a bitch to dock with though. Their docking procedure is so damned slow, they'd never manage it without constantly firing the OMS engines. But anyways, that goes beyond the scope of the show, where they're suppose to be in the real shuttle at 1G in LEO.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  200. All a double hoax? by btempleton · · Score: 1

    Right. Next you'll be telling me that all the people on "The Office" reality show are actors too.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  201. Went down hill by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I have to say the launch was a real let down. The first episodes were great, the flying around the north sea for hours, the Russian base complete with guards and Russian bureaucracy it was absolutely brilliant and the attention to detail was awe inspiring. It just went down hill from there, its like they ran out of money and so everything else is a load of crap. Its a shame because they really could have pulled it off, when they came off that plane and were escorted to the base they were totally convinced they were in the middle of Russia.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  202. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by PriceIke · · Score: 1

    I thought the "fake earth" was digital special effects projected (or something) on a big screen outside their window. How would something be "falling off" an image on a screen, unless it was specifically built into the image shown ... unless of course she got a glimpse of that pesky moth in the studio.

    Another thing .. "falling from the earth"? To where? Someone really needs to sit poor Keri down when this is all over and have a little chat with her about this thing we call gravity. (It's not just a good idea; it's the law.)

    Of course I'm perfectly willing to accept that Keri is just acting the part of being stupid for the sake of the show.

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  203. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by taion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Brilliant! It's a hoax within a hoax. Misleading the public to believe that we're misleading our contestants, eh? Wouldn't that be ingenious?

    --

    ----------
    Floccinaucinihilipilification - the action or habit of judging something to be worthless
  204. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other words, everything they "learned" about spaceflight from this little "voyage" they will have to unlearn because it's probably made-up hooey to perpetuate their ignorance. Assuming these kids are as dumb as they're playing on the show (which is debatable), what's happening to them is cruel, not funny.

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  205. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

    +5 Funny??? +5 Insightful! Why don't I get mod points any more? :-(

  206. Re:It IS a fake! ??? by Mungkie · · Score: 1

    "To be fair, they do seem to have gone to great pains to make sure their victims are emotionally stable and will appreciate the joke."

    Noone is REALLY "emotionally stable", most mental health practitioners couldn't tell a bannana from half a fruit loop.

    You also seem to be assuming that I am wrong in my supposition that all involved are actors. Most can easily be traced to the backgrounds of east enders, hollyoaks, and some even seen in other so called "reality shows" such as dragons den, how clean is your ass, etc.....

    I suppose it is true that the only people with the spare time to go to these type of show auditions are students, the unemployed, and out of work actors. But these type of people would generally go along with anything if there is the chance of earning a crust. Even if there is no direct collusion with the producers I am sure the 'victims' realise that the longer they keep up the pretense the more they earn.

    NOTHING is real on TV even reality.

  207. Read about the hoax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Read about the hoax... by Alderin1 · · Score: 1

      LOL That's just too rich!

      Mod parent up +1 informative!

      ...if only I had mod points.

      --
      No conformist ever made history.
  208. Gravity eww, no thanks. No space for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to go into orbit without being able to experience weightlessness for at least a small duration of the experience.
    Besides some scenic views there's not much point. It's not as if you are going to a specific destination like the Moon or Mars. You're not even cruising around the Earth's neighborhood looking for space alien chicks.
    Weightlessness is going to be a huge attraction to space tourism until space travel becomes routine. Then business class sections will need to offer the luxury of artifical gravity

  209. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


        Technically, we're all orbiting, and at FTL speed. It's all relative to the point of reference.

        Go ahead and ask, "Huh?"

        We're on this planet moving at about 1,000 mph (depending on latitude). The earth is rotating around the sun at 67,000 mph.

        The mikey way galaxy is rotating at roughly 490,000 mph.

        So, at just the right point in our year, when all those vectors are going the same way, you could be traveling at 558,000 mph, relative to an object which is moving in the same direction we are from galactic center, but not following the motion of the milky way galaxy.

        I could go on, but... Right now, my motion relative to my desk is 0.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  210. MTV leads the way again... by mskilling · · Score: 1

    They had "The Real World" before any other reality/big brother tv show.

    Then they had "Laguna Beach" the actor based "reality" show that this program seems to be copying. That is if the previously linked article proves to be true.

    This just proves that in the general public has on better taste in television than a 13 year old girl. (this sentence may just be my opinion)

  211. Fear makes the public learn science. by jlseagull · · Score: 1

    That's right, fear. Fear that this kind of thing might someday happen to THEM, and they're humiliated on national television for thinking the sun revolves around the earth, handing $5000 to a Nigerian email scammer, being sucked into an obvious pyramid scheme, saying global warming doesn't exist, and thinking evolution is a myth. We need a show that humiliates and pokes fun of every capable human that doesn't get basic logic, finance, economics, and science.

    Frankly, I'm glad that rational humanism is finally winning out over caveman superstition and stupidity, and we the scientists aren't going to get another shot at stamping out stupidity and fundamentalism.

    I want Judy and Joe Q. Lowest Common Denominator secretly thinking "I might be getting secretly recorded by hidden cameras for a nationally televised reality show" EVERY TIME THEY GO OUTSIDE. I want her to imagine the muffled laughter of a studio audience at her expense every time she can't figure out a 15% tip without a calculator. I want him to cringe at invisible cameras when he talks about Jewish plots to take over the world with his drinking buddies. I want her to mentally cower before a hyperkinetic Ashton Kutcher yelling "you got PUNK'D!" when she buys the latest Louis Vuitton bag made by Sri Lankan children for 1000x what the raw materials cost. We need to associate idiocy, ignorance, gullibility, and intolerance with public humiliation.

    Make Joe and Judy fear public humiliation, and they'll eventually educate themselves instead of blindly going along to get along. ...ahhh, that feels better. Rant off. Some might argue that stupidity is an economic necessity - no one would ever make a profit on any consumer thingie if no one was susceptible to advertising and social pressure. Oh well.

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  212. I wish the Cosmonauts were American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how much more the shows producers could have got away with.

  213. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ru/\/\or has it that he sucks like a champ. Confirm?

  214. TV sucks and always will suck by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

    Ignorance and proffit.TV deliver the ignorant to the takers.

  215. BAZING! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  216. What's the phone number? by jemenake · · Score: 1

    Quick! I wanna call in and vote for explosive decompression.

  217. Glorifying the dumb by jemenake · · Score: 1

    How stupid do these people have to be? A gravity generator? Are you freaking kidding me? And "low orbit" not giving you weightlessness?

    Please tell me that the "winners" of this thing are the people who figure out that it's bogus and that the "prize" is getting to keep your reproductive organs.

  218. America has officially lost its monopoly on stupid by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    America has officially lost its monopoly on stupid

    Not quite true, we [America] still have to deal with George Bush, Jr. for the next 3 years. If foreigners actually knew how most Americans thought about the current leader of its country, then they truely would understand the embarassment we feel from the lack of intelligence displayed by our current President. Certainly, it can be implied by the multitude of Bushisms, that "W" is not an intellectual giant. "W" even admitted, jokingly, that he had "to knock on a lot of doors to follow in the old man's footsteps" to attend Yale University....."and for those of you with a C-average, you too can become President of the United States of America."

  219. from the where-do-you-find-people-this-stupid dept by pgilman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in front of their televisions, watching "reality tv."

    --
    if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
  220. I got all excited... by EnglishSteve · · Score: 1

    ...when I misread the post as "In the last reality show on British TV". Now I have realised my mistake and am depressed.

  221. "Pharmaceutical Sales" by runlvl0 · · Score: 1
    Could someone explain to me why so many folks on reality shows are in "Pharmaceutical Sales"?
    It's just a more polite way to say "drug dealer". It's like my sister, who's an "entertainer."
    --

    Carthago delenda est!
  222. Not unless they are complete and total fools by sirket · · Score: 1

    Having never seen the show and not caring one bit whether or not it is real:

    I have just one question- Why? Why bother to try to hoax an audience? What's the point? Pissing off the viewers? What the fuck does that accomplish? "Hahahaha everyone who watches out show is stupid!" I can see how that would be a fantastic marketing gimmick- No one would ever watch anything from these producers again. Moreover how do you know you succeeded? Everyone will just claim to know it was a joke and then what are you left with? It's complete idiocy.

    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." People these days are stupid- not just ignorant but downright stupid. That you could trick someone into believing they were being sent into space hardly seems like a difficult task to me.

    -sirket

    1. Re:Not unless they are complete and total fools by syousef · · Score: 1

      I think you overestimate people.

      Why? SMS voting, advertising revenue. DVD sales. Lots of ways to make money out of fools watching the show.
      Won't people just stop watching. No, some will even go on about how clever it was.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Not unless they are complete and total fools by Floody · · Score: 1

      Having never seen the show and not caring one bit whether or not it is real:

      I have just one question- Why? Why bother to try to hoax an audience? What's the point? Pissing off the viewers? What the fuck does that accomplish? "Hahahaha everyone who watches out show is stupid!" I can see how that would be a fantastic marketing gimmick- No one would ever watch anything from these producers again. Moreover how do you know you succeeded? Everyone will just claim to know it was a joke and then what are you left with? It's complete idiocy.

      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." People these days are stupid- not just ignorant but downright stupid. That you could trick someone into believing they were being sent into space hardly seems like a difficult task to me.

      Note: I work in the mainstream entertainment industry. Yes, I am jaded.

      This sort of thing is hardly new, this is just taking it to another level. Reality television is all 100% bogus. No need to directly attribute it to malice though, when common greed will do. The crap sells; in that nasty tabloid way that makes you feel kinda sleazy should you be so unlucky as to be momentarily exposed. But more importantly in the eyes of media conglomerates: it's cheap as hell to make. Script-writers? No need, just throw together some melodrama themes and toss them at these young bright actors all quite willing to do anything and everything for that shot at the big time. Actors love improv anyway. Editing? Bah, cut on any ole NLE with a formulaic sequence of burst cuts optimally timed to introduce the next ad as quickly as possible; easily get two-to-five eps cut in an afternoon with out needing any prior film experience.

      One of the leading commercial producers of reality television lives (and has been incredibly successful) by the following motto:

      All Sizzle ... No Steak

  223. The tragedy here is... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    ... that from what I've seen, the show's crap. One can marvel for a while at the sheer scale of potential human gullibility, but that gets old quickly. I watched tonight's episode and it was just plain boring. I can see how the casting episode would have been fun - openly selecting for stupidity would have been fine entertainment - and I look forward to the final episode, to see their terrible disappointment and misery, but in between I can't see the point of watching any more.

    Worse yet, they could have done this properly. Make it a major event, not a two-week joke show. Something on the scale of Big Brother or I'm a Celebrity. Establish your UK-based space camp, don't lie about it, run the basic training. Examiners nominate people to be kicked out - opportunity here for Simon Cowell levels of nastiness. After a couple of weeks, the last n contestants go to Russia. Cue much fun on the centrifuges and things, and more people get sent back to Blighty weekly. At the end of the series, the last contestant gets a trip in a for-real Soyuz. spaceadventures.com charges $20m for that. That's, what, £12m? Chances are you'd get a fair discount for giving them publicity on such a scale.

    It would surely have been the biggest prestige show ever made. Would it cost a lot? Sure. A lot for TV, but nowhere near typical Hollywood budgets. Would it make that money back? Hell yeah. The whole damn world would have copied the format.

    But no. The show we've got is just a 'let's look at the freaks' game. It's a real pity.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  224. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Phishcast · · Score: 1

    Right you are, Ken.

  225. face it, they're paid shills by irote · · Score: 1

    Oh come off it, they're actors. They've been paid to do it. They know what's going on.

    Otherwise they'd come out to all the humiliation and Channel 4 could legitimately be sued for the psychological stress and stolen time.

    in a cunning twist, it's the viewers who will be revealed to be gullible.

    You see, it's Channel 4, so it has to edgy, self-referential and provocative, or shit as the less sophisticated among us would call it.

    1. Re:face it, they're paid shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise they'd come out to all the humiliation and Channel 4 could legitimately be sued for the psychological stress and stolen time.

      That's what contracts are for.

    2. Re:face it, they're paid shills by irote · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      A contract would count for nothing if they could show a court that they had suffered harm (ie. humiliation that caused mental or emotional distress).

      They could simply claim that Channel 4 had failed to make clear the extent of the embarassment they would suffer. Unless the contract explicitly stated: "You will be unaware that you are not going to space. You will be portrayed as a half-witted imbicile and your moment of dawning revalation and shame will be broadcast on live TV," then their case would be proven.

      Of course, if the contract does contain such a provision, then they aren't contestants, they're shills, as I said.

  226. Earlu 1950s Reality TV show di the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this link for photos and more information:

    http://www.solarguard.com/tccast5.htm

    Unfortunately for these early space cadets, gravity generators had yet to be invented.

  227. Deep space sling by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

    Why not extended the elevator 'shaft' well beyond GEO, then vessels could fly off the far end at extreme velocities and reach outside our solar system a lot faster than any chemical rocket could manage. The earth's got plenty of rotational kinetic energy to spare...and everyone's always griping they need more hours in their day anyway. ;-)

  228. microgravity is tidal forces by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    IIRC, "microgravity" is due to tidal forces and it falls off as 1/R^3.

    In something closer to English, imagine you're floating in the center of a falling elevator. The floor is slightly closer to the earth and therefore has a slightly higher gravitational attraction than you. The ceiling is slightly further from the earth and has a slightly lower gravitation attraction than you.

    From your perspective as you fall, there's a slightly gravitational attraction to both floor and ceiling, with the effect becoming more pronounced as you approach either.

    It's more complicated when you're moving and have to use orbital mechanics, but you get the same qualitative results.

    IIRC, the tidal forces in earth orbit may a few thousandths of a 'g'. That's easily overwhelmed by air circulation, etc., so the astronauts probably don't even notice it. It can be enough to affect sensitive experiments.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  229. The sick twist... by shadowmatter · · Score: 1

    The crazy Russian pilot should tell them that the oxygen supply is running low, and it's not enough to maintain the entire crew. So one of them has to get discarded out the airlock, which consists of a large steel door with no windows. Somehow, one of them is chosen (or "voted off the island"), put in the airlock behind the steel door. Once the inner, steel door is closed, the outer door opens, and crew from the TV show grab the person and shut the outer door again. After half a minute or so has passed, the Russian opens the inner door to show the rest that she's really gone. The russian then leads them into a wonderful drinking game, which lasts the remainder of the trip.

    - shadowmatter

  230. MOD PARENT DOWN by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

    I don't usually do this but - I don't watch this crap on British TV and I'd prefer you don't post it on slashdot, whatever the reason. The more we ignore it, the quicker it will go away.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The more we ignore it, the quicker it will go away.

        Dream on.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  231. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by schnitzi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, that would be a good show. Hire a bunch of contestants, and tell them that the whole thing is actually a hoax, and to pretend that they believe that they're actually being launched into space, and then (here's the tricky part) actually launch them into space.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  232. nice idea by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    That's a nice idea. 0g sex, easy to clean. But, under the floor to increase gravity to build muscle and 20G when you are not home, so anyone breaking in would be stuck to the floor.

  233. The Mercer Report. by triso · · Score: 1
    This all reminds me of a Canadian program which showed how "stupid" americans are. I think it was called "the Mercer Report" (not sure). He went to the US and interviewed americans with the most ridiculous questions about their feelings on Canadian topics.
    See http://www.cbc.ca/mercerreport/, for info on this classic Canadian show.
  234. I can see it now... by glwtta · · Score: 1

    In the last episode, a large fly crawling around an open access panel short-circuits the cabin power supply, and they crash into the Moon.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  235. depends on where you put your character points by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Carbon116 is right; the guy across the street from me when I was a kid had a master's degree in biology and worked for a large company, but was completely clueless in every other respect, a complete and utter idiot.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  236. Technically speaking, by RandomInAction · · Score: 1

    all objects are gravity generators :)

    Not in C++, gravity_generation() is just another method.

  237. Reality TV by Sashira · · Score: 1

    So this is a TV show... with actors. Is this really news? "The Blair Witch Project" was supposedly real, and I was silly enough to believe it until I saw them list the "written by" credit. It almost made it an interesting movie. This sounds like an amusing show; so was "The Simple Life", in my opinion, despite the slapstick amateur acting of a pair of rich girls. You know what would be fun? A gladiatorial reality show. Not like "American Gladiator"; no, like the Roman coliseums. Offer people fantastic prizes to survive ten minutes with a hungry, angry tiger, or to murder each other with tridents and stuff. Or stage a naval battle just for the hell of it. You could never get approval to do a show where people would actually die, I suppose, so you'd have to do it with - hey, actors! Hm, I wonder where I can get a stuntman who's good at acting mauled....

  238. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    perhaps the participants know it is fake and choose not to let on.

    Especially as they are paid £5,000 for each day of the "mission" they complete. Play dumb and collect the cheque.

  239. Conspiracy theories by The+Happy+Robot · · Score: 1

    It is well documented that whenever there is a TV show or whatever where the audience knows something that the contestants do not, there must be some sort of hoax going on and perhaps it is the audience who is being fooled. And sometimes these theories themselves come under scrutiny.

    So in terms of this programme I can see different conspiracies that may be occurring, each getting more complicated than the last.
    1. Basic - The contestants are the ones being fooled, we (the audience) is fully in the know. We know they are on earth, they think they are in space.
    2. Secondary - It is the audience who is being hoodwinked, the contestants are all actors or at least in on the plot. They and we know they are on earth, we don't know that they know.
    3.Tertary - We don't know that they don't know we know. The "contestants" (actors) think that they are actually fooling us into thinking they are in space, we just think they are idiots.
    4. Quaternary - We don't know that they know they are actually in space. The contestants are actually in space; we think they are on earth.
    5. Quintinary - (my personal favourite) we don't know that they know that we are all actually in space and they are still on earth, possibly laughing at us.

  240. Reality shows use casting agencies for contestants by FromWithin · · Score: 1

    I think it highly unlikely that these people were hired to act in the show. You'll find that all of these reality shows put out a call through the casting agencies for contestants. It's an easy way to get access to a bunch of outgoing people without having to dredge through thousands of complete mutants after putting out a public advert.

  241. Destination Mir by sprintkayak · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago I heard about Mark Burnett (Survivor creator) trying to put together a show where the contestants would go through Russian Space Camp and the winner would be sent for a trip to the Russian space Station Mir. It was all I could talk about. Friends said they wouldn't fly in a Russian shuttle, but I didn't care. So worth the risk. I don't have money for space tourism.

    As for the idea that the show is a cruel hoax: I wish I was in it. At least I could have thought I was in space. The fact that it was fake doesn't take away that it would be great fun. Of course even if interviewed (and British) I would probably have been rejected since I would have been fascinated by the science they would need to make up (gravity generator) and ask too many questions.

  242. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confir/\/\ed. His skills in de-chroming trailer hitches is the stuff of legend.

  243. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    ...and if they decide they don't want to be a part of the "mission" anymore, they get tossed out the "airlock" in their underwear...
    :b

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  244. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by TerminalInsanity · · Score: 1

    The whole show seems it may be a joke on the viewers, and not the people on the show... Apparently, Two are actors.

  245. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how much $$$ Armageddon brought in?

    Something about two space shuttles docking simultaniously to a spinning Mir space station. I had to leave, I was getting a headache, especially when were walking around in a spinning can, in space. The first thing that came to my mind was something about the special effect dept running out of funding for this scene.

    Anyway, my point...

    If that movie can make that much money it is very possible that these 'astronauts' actually beleive they are in space.

  246. Nothing new here by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    In India there was a Reality show , in which the TV person would do things like open up a fake barber shop. When the customer comes in he will take a hacksaw chainsaw etc., Later it was found out it was all faked. The "gullible customers" were paid in advance to walk the talk. This happens in many other "Reality Shows" etc., where the real people who are stupid are the audience. "The gullible space tourists" and the "TV channel" are the one who will walk away with big money, as you watch them and think "How stupid"

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  247. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I remember one where a bunch of girls were in a house and they competed to see who could cry the most in a month. The tears were collected in little test tubes. The girls were insane, and would hit themselves and such to make themselves cry. They would also get really upset if they dropped a tear on the ground. They'd even hold their eyes open for hours just to water them up.

    It was really, really pathetic and scary. I don't know what they were competing for, but on Japanese TV shows it's never more than like a weeks vacation somewhere, or a small pittance.

  248. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    Just a note -- I didn't mean they were literally insane. What do you want? It's 2 am and I'm studying for my Japanese and real analysis finals for tomorrow.

  249. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha, where are my mod points ... brilliant ...

  250. *sigh* by ZeoRanger · · Score: 1

    I'm personally still of the opinion that any show titled "Survivor" should be about people actually living through something... Like being infected with the ebola virus, or having to swim through pools of frickin' sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their frickin' heads.

    Rabid wombats, fussy pre-schoolers, or even some ill-tempered sea bass would do.

    Ugh... I despise television.

    -z-

    --
    -z-
  251. Just wait for it. by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for the moment when they all find out they've been had and attack Jonnie Vaughn beating him into a coma with their helmets. Seriously due to the selection process they used they've not ended up with a group of contestants that could be said to be wired up correctly have they? I can see one or more of them suffering a psychotic break when they find out that they've been the laughing stock of a nation for the past 10 days. They'll probably end up suing the BBC for emotional distress afterwards.

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
    1. Re:Just wait for it. by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      >They'll probably end up suing the BBC for emotional distress afterwards.

      yes, especially because the BBC has NOTHING to do with this programme.

    2. Re:Just wait for it. by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

      Damn it. My mistake, I meant Channel 4. Apologies, I must have missed a cup of coffe today.

      --
      To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  252. Re(2): [all of them are actors] by n3k5 · · Score: 1

    i'm not saying its utterly implausible that none of the journalists reporting on this did proper fact-checking; in fact it would be great if they were outed and ridiculed for mindlessly propagating press releases and passing them off as facts. but on the other hand, consider this: the producers were looking for people who are suggestible, not interested in physics (and avionics, space flight etc.), like to be on TV, haven't got anything better to do (like a full time job), and don't mind doing embarrassing things with strangers watching. some of the people they got were amateurish actors who've been on TV one or two times before. there is not necessarily a contradiction there; for a 'reality show', that's par for the course.

    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    1. Re:Re(2): [all of them are actors] by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Above the actor peice, you have to find the premise TOO elaborite, to complex. It doesn't seem plausable in the slightest. Most kids learn about gravity. 99.9% of people have seen astronauts in space floating around. Tons of people have at least seen space-flicks such as Apollo 13, with a high G launch.

      My faith in humanity (the poor shred there is left) cannot beleive that there exists people that stupid. Eventually they will have to question why the NO ONE ELSE uses gravity generators.

      I am so sick of Reality tv, though I know I should like just for its post-modern irony. I think, even if not paid to do so, that all of reality tv is nothing but acting, these clowns are doing what is expected of them. I'm supposed to have a functional IQ of 2, and be a duplicitous bitch, so be it! This show, I still think, has taken it to the maximum logical level.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  253. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by VdG · · Score: 1

    Give them lots of unpleasant tasks to do, and see which one's the first to try to walk out in disgust.

  254. They shoud sue by SirBruce · · Score: 1

    Assuming these contestants really are just stupid, then they should sue the makers of the show afterwards for the hoax, and force them to either keep their contract to send them into space or to give them equivalent monetary compensation. Not to mention damages for the pain and suffering from being humiliating in front of millions of people.

    Unless, of course, it says clearly in the contracts they signed that this is all a hoax. But then they'd have noticed that, wouldn't they? Unless they're really, REALLY stupid.

    Bruce

  255. "The Right Stuff" wasn't a best-seller? by ianscot · · Score: 1
    I think you give the standard American viewer far too much credit. The same people that watch "American Idol" and "Wifeswapping" have no interest in the NASA space program.

    You may be right, but tell me which show you think more people would watch:

    1. A contest in which people went through the legitimate training regimen of elite fighter pilots, with emotions running high and extreme physical demands on them; or
    2. A show about nitwits who get tricked into thinking a flight sim is real and that they're zooming around fighting all sorts of implausible dogfights?

    The flight sim show would lose its appeal after one episode.

    "A Christmas Story" has returned many times its original investment. "Jingle All the Way," by contrast, is mean and stupid and failed miserably. People do recognize decent stuff.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  256. Studied the psychology of it? by JunkmanUK · · Score: 1

    I'm interested to see that no conversations on this subject mention the potential psychological effects of this show. It's very easy to state that you would under no circumstances believe that you were in space but, for most people I've challenged when saying this, they have some knowledge of physics or technology. The selection process here deliberately weedled out those with this kind of knowledge.

    Take a look at hoax emails, viruses, worms - these are all propogated by naivety, you don't have to be dumb to be affected by it. It's easy to have a lapse in your vigorous checking and fall foul.

    Ok, now extend that to a three week subterfuge. Sustaining an illusion for a length of time this long can only amplify and cement it further. By throwing enough false information, concealment and illusion at a person you can muffle any potential questions. By deliberately selecting those who have a tendancy to translate their own feelings into those which fall in with their peers you can ensure there is no potential for personal conviction getting in the way.

    Adding it all up: technologically this format is flawed but psychologically it's got it right.

  257. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  258. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    i'd thinnk the obvious way to dock with a rotating space station would be to have the port in the middle

    possiblly even have the port non-rotating and have some kind of transfer chamber (e.g. you crawl into the transfer chamber close the door and then it would match rotation with the rest of the station open another door and you crawl out)

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  259. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


        The full fledged circular designs that I've seen in movies and technical drawings was like this. Actually, I believe the center can rotate, and your craft can match the rotation. It would seem trivial to make the docking platform spin on bearings and make no motion.

        Balance would still seem to be very important. If all the inhabitents or too much payload ended up at one part of the wheel, it would make the entire wheel off balance. Think of your laundry washing machine walking across the floor due to an unbalanced load.

        You can build a perfect machine, but human error is a bastard.

        I remember a carnival ride called Gravitron. Ahhh, the wonders of the Internet. It exerts 4G, and the control booth is in the middle, where the operator doesn't feel anything.

        The really notable problem is that if you turn your head while it's running, it can make you nauseous. I suppose that's because you're being pulled by 4G horizontally, and 1G vertically. Obviously the 4G horizontally is the more noticable force.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  260. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by GoRK · · Score: 1

    Well I wasnt talking about necessarily building a big spinning ring inside the space shuttle.. just a compartment big enough for one person to sit in and experience 1G. You only need to lift the counterweight of one person or maybe less depending on how big you can really get it. The gravity difference between your feet and head would indeed be large enough to make it non-feasable but it still might work.

    As far as the counterweight/ouside the shuttle idea.. Again I was not talking about faking gravity aboard the whole shuttle.. Just build a little pod and a counterweight for it that you can deploy out of the cargo bay and then spin them both around the shuttle at a distance... You would need some sort of bearing that goes around the outside of the shuttle. In any case you would probably need an equal setup spinning the other direction or else you are not going to be able to properly accelerate the contraption without just spinning the shuttle itself.

  261. Enormous Mutant Star Goat Episode by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Really, those four people are so lucky! They'll be off the planet when the Enormous Mutant Star Goat arrives!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  262. "Weapons of Mass Destruction" show still popular by billstewart · · Score: 1

    While they've lost much of their initial popularity, the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and "Saddam's in League with Al-Qaeda" shows still seem to be playing fairly well on the "Enemies" network in the US an UK.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  263. Re(4): [all of them are actors] by n3k5 · · Score: 1
    Most kids learn about gravity. 99.9% of people have seen astronauts in space floating around. Tons of people have at least seen space-flicks such as Apollo 13, with a high G launch.
    From a recent nytimes article:
    As for the great ruck of ordinary Americans, they are merely uninterested in, or perhaps bored by, science. Only one in five has bothered to take a physics course. Three out of four haven't heard that the universe is expanding. Nearly half, according to a recent survey, seem to believe that God created man in his present form within the last 10,000 years. Less than 10 percent of adult Americans, it is estimated, are in possession of basic scientific literacy.
    And the list goes on and on ... the situation could be much better in Britain and you'd still find people that believe in the healing powers of magnets, the effectiveness of dowsing rods, or the importance of having speaker cables of equal length. Your estimate of the general public's critical thinking skills is way too optimistic.
    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  264. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    What's even better is that we convince them that we're not hoaxed by their hoax, and that we're actually enthralled by the show. But instead we're watching Gilligan's Island reruns. But maybe they know we're not watching. But, unbeknownst to them, we have been taking small quantities of reality TV for years, and so have become immune to the effects of lame melodrama, and can watch the show while appearing to not watch the show.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  265. Re:America has officially lost its monopoly on stu by Red_Foreman · · Score: 0
    America lost it's monopoly on stupid a long time ago.

    Your monopoly on stupid is in no danger of being challenged, however.

  266. Wha...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. But I'm a Japanese guy named Ken?