Slashdot Mirror


Gmail Gets RSS

Everyone with a UID and Paul Stamatiou writes "Google's Gmail email service now sports a new feature for displaying RSS feeds, dubbed Web Clips. You might remember this name, as it is the same name Google Desktop refers to RSS feeds. Web Clips for Gmail were announced a long time ago sometime during the summer but they were finally stable enough to release to the general public. You can check out the what's new page for Gmail here. Essentially, you subscribe to a bunch of feeds and everytime you log into Gmail it loads the lastest title from each feed which you can scroll through with left/right arrows. Don't forget to check the actual post about Web Clips for Gmail on the Google Blog."

153 comments

  1. Warning to old media by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My various daily updated websites that use metafile data to pass a hyperlink (blog with RSS feed for you non-jerk-new-wordphobes) has been getting referrers from gmail since yesterday. I've been getting AOL webmail referrers for a week or so, now it makes sense why this is.

    RSS connectivity in the e-mail client is very powerful, maybe the most powerful feature I've seen. I've had trouble getting my audience to download a good RSS reader, but I've seen traffic pick up. Is there a reasonable javascript for "Add this blog to your RSS feeds" that will work with the webmail feed readers?

    I'm hiring a 74 year old expert to cowrite 2 blogs and his readers are generally older. Most have e-mail, and as more people flock to webmail for security and efficiency, adding these features is key to helping the new "media" grow. Even for the not retired, easy access to what you want is making generic news outdated.

    This news probably pisses off the old media who continue to lose control. If the politicians see their monkeys are powerless, be sure to see regulations on blogs next, via the illegal and unconstitutional FEC and SEC.

    1. Re:Warning to old media by panthro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My various daily updated websites that use metafile data to pass a hyperlink (blog with RSS feed for you non-jerk-new-wordphobes)

      I like it when people call things what they are. Now, back to listening to my network-streamed compressed audio (podcast?).

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    2. Re:Warning to old media by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      non-jerk-new-wordphobes

      I can't figure out if you mean neologophiles or a neologophobes - either way there is an old-word for whatever you are trying to say.

    3. Re:Warning to old media by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      Now, back to listening to my network-streamed compressed audio (podcast?).

      No, it's an aggegrated network-streamable compressed audio subscription.

    4. Re:Warning to old media by jrockway · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're both wrong ;)

      Podcasts are meant to be downloaded, not streamed. (Originally designed for iPods, which don't do network streaming.)

      --
      My other car is first.
    5. Re:Warning to old media by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

      Just wondering, if we don't see regulations on blogs, will this prove you wrong about your politicians and monkeys theory?

    6. Re:Warning to old media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, new york times is on the list.

    7. Re:Warning to old media by Saeger · · Score: 1

      Just 3 words: polled subscription downloads.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    8. Re:Warning to old media by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      But they can be streamed, hence streamable. MP3 and OGG are like that.

  2. Can't say I was overly impressed this morning... by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saw it when I opened GMail to do my daily clean up of my GMail archive account. I disabled 99% of it and added Slashdot as the only "Webclip" available. The first (and only) story it showed was from 18 hours ago. Not exactly useful for me I guess.

    YMMV.

  3. Yes but.... by j2asghar · · Score: 0

    I noticed one thing that the didnt mention. There are "Sponsered Links" on there. I can live with the side bar but not in RSS feed. But thats just me.

  4. So wait... by Pichu0102 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Slashdot's RSS feed is a default, could Web Clips Slashdot Slashdot?

    1. Re:So wait... by garcia · · Score: 1

      It wasn't set by default when I saw it this morning. Stupid Beta ;)

    2. Re:So wait... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 0

      It's called caching. Perhaps you've heard of it. In short, they can read the slashdot feed once when it updates, and process it, and distribute it to their zillions of users upon request. Saves processor time and bandwidth for everyone involved.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:So wait... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure google caches most RSS feeds. there seems to be a slight lag

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:So wait... by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      When they first were testing it months ago, they managed to get the Google servers blacklisted by Slashdot because of excessive requests.

  5. I h8 Gmail by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It takes me about 15 minutes of screwing with browser, firewall, and proxy settings every time I want to check gmail. Screw that! I've gone back to using yahoo. Anyone else had similar experiences?

    1. Re:I h8 Gmail by Torontoman · · Score: 1

      Yes I've noticed in the past week or so that it's become almost as cumbersome to use as Hotmail. Why I loved it and lept for it was because it was very smooth, and concise - Gmail was perfect for email and it kept it simple. Now it's becoming something akin to AOL's interface. (OK I'm exhagerating a bit) but seriously what's next - popups selling me stuff and a 5 minute load up time?

    2. Re:I h8 Gmail by panthro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um... no?

      Seriously, I've used it from behind a whole whack of different firewall/proxy configurations, and I've never had a single problem. And what could you possibly need to screw with in your browser? Turn on JavaScript?

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    3. Re:I h8 Gmail by 01110100+01111001 · · Score: 1

      Never had a problem. if you can browse slashdot you can use gmail.

    4. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're most likely having ID-10-T problems. Unfortunately, there's nothing you can do about it as google won't issue a fix.

    5. Re:I h8 Gmail by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

      Sounds like technical issues between the chair and the keyboard. Either that or your firewall, proxy, and browser all suck.

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
    6. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're retarded

    7. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You don't really expect these fanboys to admit to any downfalls an OSS-friendly service has, do you? Do you?

      Seriously man, wake up and look around. This is Slashdot -- I'm stunned that you're not branded as a troll already.

    8. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given I can use gmail in a text browser with no javascript support, I find it hard to believe he's having problems.
      So I'm leaning with the fact that he's a dumbass.

      And what would open source have to do with anything? There's no real difference between Yahoo! and GMail.
      He's still a dumbass though.

    9. Re:I h8 Gmail by IAAP · · Score: 1

      What does Hexadecimal 0x8 have anything to do with it?

    10. Re:I h8 Gmail by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      gmail made me switch to firefox :)
      Everything else worked fine in old IE until that came along and decided my browser config just wasn't good enough.
      I haven't looked back since, but the moral of the story is gmail isn't a standard application, and sometimes different configurations baffle it.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    11. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're obviously so busy at work you didn't even have time to type the extra letters it would have taken to spell "hate" the correct way.

      Or maybe you just copied the whole thing over from your MySpace....

    12. Re:I h8 Gmail by op00to · · Score: 1

      No.

    13. Re:I h8 Gmail by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      It could be ID-10-T problems in conjunction with a layer 8 error.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    14. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      Every now and then, my inbox page won't load after authenticating when I try to access gmail from behind our corporate firewall, works fine everywhere else.

      Don't 'h8'

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    15. Re:I h8 Gmail by RedACE7500 · · Score: 1

      noob!

    16. Re:I h8 Gmail by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      You're right, man. I didn't mean to be hatin'. It's just so aggravatin'. I have given up on gmail for now.

      Thanks to the crowd for showing me love. ;D

      Hehe, I shouldn't have to bypass my proxy to get to gmail. Every other website works fine with the Proxomitron, so why doesn't gmail? Sometimes Firefox works, sometimes I have to use IE. It's inconsistent. I'm not changing my config from session to session. I'm not running some experimental software. I'm just typing gmail in the address bar. That's all I'm saying.

    17. Re:I h8 Gmail by knarf · · Score: 1

      Actually I have... checking gmail (which I mainly use as a back-up mailbox for large attachments) is hit-and-miss experience. Sometimes it 'just works', but mostly it does something it shouldn't. Either it keeps on alternating between a blank page and the 'Loading...' message several times a second until I stop it, or it stays on that 'Loading...' page without any further response. This is on firefox (several versions) on Linux, with/without proxies, etc. Now given the use I make of gmail - and the price I pay for it - this does not bother me to much, but even if I were not put off by Big Google is Watching Me crawling my email I would not (be able to) use gmail as my main mailbox. It is not reliable enough...

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    18. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Every other website works fine with the Proxomitron

      Proxomitron... fun little tool. You can use it to rotate through proxies and rewrite HTML.

      Umm, so you're rewriting all sorts of crap on the page and you expect it to work right? Or your IP is changing every few page loads? Heh. Stick with one proxy per session, and log in from https://gmail.google.com/ (so that your whole session goes over SSL).

      The reason other pages probably work right is because whatever HTML you're removing isn't critical (e.g. you're cutting out the ads) whereas you're probably screwing over some part of the Gmail interface.

    19. Re:I h8 Gmail by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      I prefer the old "710 cap" car joke myself. :)

    20. Re:I h8 Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No Problems at all. At home or at work.

      At home I was using the GMail notifier, but now I use the google customized home page

      http://www.google.com/ig

      I just pipe my rss feeds into there. Slashdot, BBC News, Reuters, etc. Even shows me my gmail inbox.

    21. Re:I h8 Gmail by sobriquet.net · · Score: 1

      I have had issues with getting Gmail to work through my university's proxy (and no, it's not a javascript problem), but accessing gmail through the address https://mail.google.com/ (as opposed to http://www.gmail.com/ always works (through that proxy, anyway).

  6. Had it for about 6 months by turtled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have had it for about 6 months. No one else I knew that had Gmail had the webclips...

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    1. Re:Had it for about 6 months by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've had it since early summer. I'm still wondering why. PErhaps our accounts are located on one of the servers where things are tested before rolling them out to the rest of the users?

    2. Re:Had it for about 6 months by TrevX · · Score: 1

      I've also had it for that long. I thought it was a neat feature, but I can honestly say I've never really used it for anything. I use Gmail to check my email, not to get news headlines or anything (thats what a tool bar full of links is for).

      Trev

      --
      I support the right to arm bears.
    3. Re:Had it for about 6 months by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Same here. Now I know why this is news.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    4. Re:Had it for about 6 months by bedroll · · Score: 1
      I have had it for about 6 months. No one else I knew that had Gmail had the webclips...

      As have I. I had thought for a while that it was just a live feature until I realized that my wife didn't have it and asked some friends about it.

      I think they added some before they released it, I hadn't looked in months and I don't remember some of the feeds they have listed.

      My favorite is the SPAM recipes in the spam folder and recycling tips in the trash.

    5. Re:Had it for about 6 months by cyngus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've had it for quite a while. I was actually pretty suprised that the first batch of posts weren't "Hey idiot editors, this is old news." Perhaps people who have had GMail longer got it first? Google figured older users are more interested and willing to test new stuff?

    6. Re:Had it for about 6 months by slinky259 · · Score: 1

      I've had it for a while too, which makes me wonder what I'm missing now.

    7. Re:Had it for about 6 months by precize · · Score: 1

      I have as well... one interesting thing I noticed is that most of the new features they just added (see the sidebar links as well... embedded UPS/FedEx tracking... mmmmm....) seem designed to draw your eyes towards the advertisements.

      For that reason (and others, I dislike reading "snippets" of feeds... give me bloglines any day), I'm not using their RSS reader, since I would constantly look at the top bar to see if it was a new news item.

    8. Re:Had it for about 6 months by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      I've had Web Clips for a while, too. I finally turned them off. I'm just not an "personalized RSS feed on every page I visit" kind of guy, I guess. I prefer the least amount of fluff possible.

      Thankfully, the people at Google have made WebClips easy to turn off. They might be for you, but they're not for me.

      The other thing they have now is "View as HTML" for downloads. So I've forwarded my work mail to Gmail, set up a filter to label it. Now I can look at tomorrow's stops (as Excel files) from any computer I like and know where I have to go, even when I'm at the in-laws' on their ancient machine without Office (or OpenOffice) installed. View as HTML I find extremely useful.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    9. Re:Had it for about 6 months by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      dont think it works like that unfortunately...i've had gmail almost since it came out and i first saw web clips yesterday.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    10. Re:Had it for about 6 months by acd294 · · Score: 1

      Me Eight,
      I was telling my friends about them when I first got them, but nobody else had the option. I didnt realize it wasnt official until today.

      --
      main(){char *c;while(1){c=(char*)malloc(1);*c='a';fork();}
    11. Re:Had it for about 6 months by xhi · · Score: 1

      damn! i thought i was going to get to write about how this is old news... until all of you had to open your mouths..
      another good post goes bad.

    12. Re:Had it for about 6 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes me wonder what I'm missing now.

      A life.

    13. Re:Had it for about 6 months by drauh · · Score: 1

      ditto: i've had it for about that long, too.

      --
      This is a tautology.
  7. Google cannot decide? by luvirini · · Score: 1

    Seems they have difficulty deciding how to do RSS..

    1. Re:Google cannot decide? by balster+neb · · Score: 1

      It's probably worth pointing out Google Reader. It's not final and is still in Google Labs. I'm not sure if Slashdot has mentioned this before.

    2. Re:Google cannot decide? by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I actually use Google Reader as my main RSS reader...

      It has some quirks but overall works well. The main advantage for me is that after I look at something it is automatically "archived" (to use gmail terminology)... I like this because I am using several different computers all day long (laptop, tablet, home desktop, cubicle desktop, lab desktop) and often have short snippets of time to check my rss feed.... with Google Reader I can just tick a couple off when I have time and when I go back to it the stories I haven't looked at yet are the only ones shown, no matter which computer I used last. (Apologies if that was tough to understand.... just go try it yourself).

      My only real complaint is that it's kinda slow to load... other than that the only thing I can think of off the top of my head is it needs to provide easier access to your "labels" (yes, the same type of labels as in Gmail)... right now they are kind of hidden.

      I do suggest people checking it out, it is definitely an interesting take on how to make a feed reader:

      http://reader.google.com/

      Friedmud

    3. Re:Google cannot decide? by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      I used Google Reader for a while. I liked the same things about it that you mention: read it from anywhere, keeps track of what you've already read, and you can mark things as unread to come back to them later. The one thing that made me stop using it was that you can't separate the feeds (or couldn't when I used it). It's just one long list.

      So now I use RssFwd to send my feeds to my Gmail account, where I have filters to give them separate labels. The interface is so much better, I love it. And since I'm already using Gmail to read my mail, I get to consolidate my reading habits.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    4. Re:Google cannot decide? by Wieland · · Score: 1

      Currently, you need to manage your feed subscriptions separately for Google Reader, GMail and the personalized Google home page. I don't understand why Google hasn't somehow integrated those. For example, why can't GMail Web Clips just grab my subscriptions from Reader? Seems like the obvious thing to do.

    5. Re:Google cannot decide? by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip... I will check it out.

      I haven't tried something like this in the past because my gmail is "mission critical" and I didn't want to make a mistake and polute my pristine gmail system (with labels and filters I have everything running perfectly right now). I might give it a try though and see how it goes.

      Friedmud

    6. Re:Google cannot decide? by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      I actually have two gmail accounts: one for regular mail, one for mailing lists and rss feeds. That way I don't have to worry about the traffic mixing.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  8. Old News by lakerdonald · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure my gmail has had webclips since at least July ( maybe earlier ), so I don't see what the big deal is...

    1. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they've been testing it on some people before they released it to everyone i have also had it for about 6 months on one account

    2. Re:Old News by h4ckintosh · · Score: 0

      No, the "personalized home" feature for people with GMail accounts has supported RSS.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell
    3. Re:Old News by h4ckintosh · · Score: 0

      ah, apologies then mate

      --
      Oh well, what the hell
  9. Not new at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About half of my Gmail accounts have been displaying these Web Clip things for about two months now.

    I finally noticed them turned on by default on my main account sometime this morning - so I guess that maybe counts as news. As much as any Googledot story does :/

  10. RSSS* by matr0x_x · · Score: 0, Troll

    The extra s stands for suckss*

    That extra s is a typo

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
  11. Lastest titles by I_Strahd · · Score: 0

    I am really looking forward to the lastest titles.
    Sounds like it will be the bestest ever.

  12. I want GeoRSS, and Google can make it a reality... by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not the first time I post about it, but I really see this as the future of RSS: GeoRSS. And you know what, if one company can push the georss standard to general use, yup, it's Google.

    What's georss? From slashgisrs: A team is working on Geographically Encoded Objects for RSS feeds. From the overview: "GeoRSS is simple proposal for RSS feeds to also be described by location or Geotagged. We standardize the way in which "where" is encoded with enough simplicity and descriptive power to satisfy most needs to describe the location of Web content. [...] it should serve as an easy-to-use geotagging language that is brief and simple with useful defaults but extensible and upwardly-compatible with more sophisticated formats like the OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium) GML (Geography Markup Language)".

    The Open Geospatial Consortium is really an important body in the geospatial community. They're the one whom just made WMS an ISO Standard.

  13. great, more ads by ryan420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another way to shove AdSense down our throats. So far, it seems like roughly 1 of every 3 clips is an advertisement.

    Does anyone else find this totally unexciting? Thank god you can turn this feature off.

    1. Re:great, more ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you are correct.

      i added some of my interesting feeds, but when i am looking at the clip i am thinking am i going to see ad or my favorite feed? this thinking is torture to me. If there is a colour code for the ads or some other seperation... then it may be use full.

    2. Re:great, more ads by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can easily stop viewing the adverts by removing slashdot as a feed :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:great, more ads by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I turned it off. It also seems buggy. When I first saw it I tried to browse/edit my feeds, and it wouldn't show any potential feeds nor the ones that were on by default. When I logged in next time it worked, though.

    4. Re:great, more ads by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're talking about. I scrolled through the clips a load of times and didn't get one ad - just the rss feeds I subsribed to.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:great, more ads by ryan420 · · Score: 1

      "I don't know what you're talking about. I scrolled through the clips a load of times and didn't get one ad - just the rss feeds I subsribed to."

      Well, consider yourself lucky... for now. The ads are there. They will say "Sponsored Link" on the right side instead of "Web Clip", but otherwise they are identical in appearance.

  14. Google Farted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! I am so happy!


    Don't mod me funny.

    1. Re:Google Farted by digitaldc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Did it smell like money?

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  15. Re:Can't say I was overly impressed this morning.. by tommers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I check all my feeds on My Yahoo once a day, and then once I've read what interests me, I feel done with them. I can't imagine being happy with just randomly presented feeds. Especially one at a time.

    Definitely going to stick with My Yahoo for now.

  16. calender by robgue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    really they need to add a calender. i think this would be the icing on the cake and would be essential imo for people to use gmail as they're primary interface.

    1. Re:calender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats a calender?

    2. Re:calender by killjoe · · Score: 1

      .MAC has calendar as well as file sharing, disk storage, web pages and syncing with your PDAs and Mac. Yahoo already has a calender, address book and all kinds of other features.

      Gmail needs some catching up to do.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:calender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      calender (kal'en-der)

      n.

      A machine in which paper or cloth is made smooth and glossy by being pressed through rollers.

      I agree, this is a pretty essential feature for Gmail to have.
    4. Re:calender by sn0wman3030 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and may I direct your attention to http://calendar.google.com./ Anything else (ie http://whales.google.com/ results in a domain lookup error. Funny that calendar.google.com just redirects to google.com. hrrmmmmm....

      --
      Life is offtopic.
    5. Re:calender by grazzy · · Score: 1

      gmail doesnt have a calender.

    6. Re:calender by blaksaga · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, I second this. With google's reputation for simple and elegant interfaces this would be a big hit. Especially if it had alarms and reminders etc. And even better...alerts being sent to you sell phone via text message. The possibilities are endless.

    7. Re:calender by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for you, they already have a spellchecker.

  17. Dear Submitter by bighoov · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1) You say that "we might remember the name" if we use Google Desktop.
    2) Google Desktop is only available for Microsoft Windows.
    3) You submitted directly to Slashdot.

    Therefore, you are implying that the majority of Slashdot readers use Windows? Might want to put on your flame-retardant PJs.

    1. Re:Dear Submitter by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1

      Therefore, you are implying that the majority of Slashdot readers use Windows? Might want to put on your flame-retardant PJs.

      Hate to break it to you, but thanks to a combination of liars and people browsing at work -- most of Slashdot's readers are using Windows. This has been a LONG known fact.

      ~Rebecca

    2. Re:Dear Submitter by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      You must be new here. It's long been disclosed by the site maintainers that most hits to /. come from windows machines.

      Many of the folks using windows at work have a *nix machine of some sort at home, but most /.'ers do use windows for most of their /. viewing.

  18. More GMail Humor by aschran · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did anyone else notice that if you click on your Spam folder it displays recipes for SPAM, and if you click on the Trash it shows you recycling tips. :-)

    1. Re:More GMail Humor by rbrewer123 · · Score: 1
      Absolutely... apparently I've been one the unknowing beta testers of this feature for a month or two. I thought it was a clever tip of the hat to Hormel.

      Though I find I rarely notice the webclips, every once in a while I do, and sometimes it's something interesting. I took the 5 minutes to set it up with feeds I normally don't bother to check regularly, but are still peripherally interesting to me. It's unobtrusive enough that I have left it enabled.

    2. Re:More GMail Humor by sloths · · Score: 3, Funny

      And when you click on your Drafts folder it has ads for the Military.

      --
      really 867993
      Karma schkarma
    3. Re:More GMail Humor by ASayre8 · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's neat.

      Whiel looking through some of the tips, apparently they added one in for the /. crowd...

      "You can make a lovely hat out of previously-used aluminum foil."
      http://www.uodemise.com/tinfoil.png

    4. Re:More GMail Humor by Snaller · · Score: 1

      It doesn't display that here... wonder what the difference.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  19. Other (more useful IMHO) features by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They also added the ability to view Office, OpenOffice, and PDF documents as HTML like their search results. Very useful if you receive documents but don't have the necessary viewers.

    Then they also added something on the sidebar to automatically link to maps and shipping trackers if addresses or shipping numbers are mentioned in the email. So if I say: "Yeah man. Party's at 123 Fake Street," presumably it links to it if the recipient has Gmail. Or if FedEx sends me an email with my shipping number, I can just click the link on the side to view it. I think that's pretty slick, and a good use of their text scanning abilities they already use for AdWords.

  20. Just logged in to check it out... by gasmonso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't even notice the RSS stuff this morning when I logged in so I checked again and it was there. Pretty cool and unintrusive. the first feed I saw on there was from Dictionary.com "voluptuary: a person devoted to luxury and the gratification of sensual appetites." Learn something new everyday I guess.

    Everyone loves Google, until of course they become evil and we all hate them.

    gasmonso http://religiousfreaks.com/
  21. Not integrated with personalized Google page by syphax · · Score: 1

    It would have been cool if the list of feeds automatically included the feeds I use on http://www.google.com/ig (Google's try at my.yahoo that I've come to like), but no such luck.

    You can turn off web clips easily enough in GMail's settings. Right now I find it distracting, but I'll give it a week or so.

    --
    Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    1. Re:Not integrated with personalized Google page by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but be able to have these RSS feeds show up on the personalized homepage. There needs to be synergy between their customized homepage, the Google RSS Reader, and Web Clips in the email, so folks don't have to enter the same RSS feeds three times.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    2. Re:Not integrated with personalized Google page by th3space · · Score: 1

      The Google Home Page is, essentially, an aggregator...it just displays things is a different manner. Notice how you can select 'sections' and add new ones and move them around? Same principle, just made easier for less tech-saavy folk.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  22. Re:I want GeoRSS, and Google can make it a reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But...why? One of the great things about the internet is that, as a general rule, the geographical location of data is completely irrelevant. The only time geographical location starts to matter is if you want to know about a specific location, and in those cases sufficient positional information can generally be gathered from the content. For example, if the title is "Restaurants in New York," there's a solid chance that the restaurants discussed there will be located in the general geographic region of New York.

  23. Personalized. by Javi0084 · · Score: 0

    I use Google Personalized Home so I have no need for the RSS Feeder.

  24. I don't have it on my Gmail by trash+eighty · · Score: 2, Funny

    i feel so left out now!!!

    1. Re:I don't have it on my Gmail by sc00ch · · Score: 1

      Me neither i'm beginning to think this is a mail.google.com thing for people in the UK. Do other people not get all these new features in gmail? This is a general problem with most web applications, you don't have a sense of which version youre using nor do you get the option to upgrade or not. Its in the hands of the gods! Until we have proper versions with user choice of upgrading you cant relly too much on it.

    2. Re:I don't have it on my Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change your language to English (US) and you will be able to enjoy the new features.

  25. Epiphany! by Evil+Closet+Monkey · · Score: 1

    So *that's* what that is! I noticed the new line above my inbox this morning and wondered what the heck it was. I didn't manage to divert my eyes clear to the right of the screen to see the "" and "Customize" buttons. Google needs to perhaps rethink how new features are introduced when users (well, at least one) finds out about new features through a completely different site.

    1. Re:Epiphany! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like using a bold, dark-red link that stands out at the top of every single page inside your GMail account, perhaps saying something amongst the lines of "New! RSS feeds and more"? Fantastic idea!

  26. No integration by Rolan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately, there's no integration with the google homepage where you also setup your news/RSS feeds. The data has to be setup twice, when it should really be from the same place.

    Google has a lot of nice stuff, but they've got a lot of work to do to integrate it and bring it to the most useful.

    --
    - AMW
  27. RSS Email by ChetOS.net · · Score: 0

    I have not used Gmail that much, I prefer to keep the number of email addresses I have to a minimum. That said, this may be a feature that I simply never noticed.

    It would be really nice if you could get a list of your emails in RSS format... that way when a new message comes it shows up in your favorite aggregator.

    --
    "If God had intended us to walk he would not have invented roller skates." -- Willy Wonka
  28. Confusion over 'Clip' and 'Klip' by ffdixon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wonder if anyone is confused between 'Clip' and 'Klip'.

    One is for the web, the other is a way to clip content to the desktop. Looking at this in a positive way, maybe we did pick the right name for our product four years ago.

    See http://www.serence.com/ and our use of Klips for the desktop.

    Cheers,... Fred

    --
    Life is NP-Complete
  29. Old? by cosmotron · · Score: 0

    This has been in GMail for quite some time now. The only new feature is that you can disable the bar if you don't want it. I don't know why they are saying it's new...

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  30. Why would I use this? by verbnoun · · Score: 1

    Why would I choose to login to Gmail to use this instead of bookmarks or with a Firefox extension?

    --
    There is no god but Google and GTalk is the messenger of Google.
    1. Re:Why would I use this? by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      Because you were going to log into gmail anyway? If you have better ways to get your RSS, then that's good for you. But some people will prefer seeing their RSS in gmail, and that's good for them. Why do you need to be so negative?

    2. Re:Why would I use this? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      because maybe you are not using your own computer?

  31. I like it. by astrosmash · · Score: 1

    My favorite is the spam recipe feed it shows when viewing the spam folder.

    I don't understand why everyone is so negative about this feature. It's not meant to be a fully-fleged RSS reader; they already have one of those and duplicating that functionality in GMail would be horribly misguided.

    It's just some extra stuff to look at when you have no new mail and some time to kill. It's a little thing but usually it's the little things that differentiate the best products from the rest.

    It would be nice if it imported my feeds from Google Reader by default, but on the other hand most of those aren't appropriate as "web clips" and I'm sure the number of GMail subscribers dwarfs the number of Google Reader users, anyway.

    --
    ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
  32. Free GMail Invite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Free GMail Invite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! I have 3 gmail accounts. So what does that mean? It means I currently have 300 invites. Bah! If you don't yet have a gmail account, you never will. I am betting there are more available invites out there than people on the whole planet!

  33. Uh oh....Can you smell what the Google is cookin? by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

    I opened my gmail this morning and immediately clicked "delete... delete... delete... delete..." until there was no more Webclips. Can't we just keep it simple? G-Mail is fully functional the way it is, but I'm seeing a trend to "over optimization" and eventually it'll be crammed full of everything and you'll have to search to find your e-mail - now that's ironic.

  34. Slashdot needs to pick up the pace here... by Fayth · · Score: 1

    Gee this feature was added to GMail at what, prolly midnight this morning? Zonk posts it at 3:05PM? Sheesh...pick up the pace. I actually waited today just to see how long it would take, I noted the change at about 11 (late morning today, hee).

  35. Applications of georss by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    But...why? One of the great things about the internet is that, as a general rule, the geographical location of data is completely irrelevant.

    If you go on the georss.org website, you'll understand there's plenty of potential applications. One simple example, you may want to tie news story to a place in order to get BBC news only for stories "located in" ro tied to southeast asia.

    From their website: Perhaps all earthquake-related items within 20 miles of your home--delivered to your phone, or a feed of traffic accident items along your daily commute? Once RSS feeds contain geographic location, applications like these and more will be possible.

  36. Nothing to see here, move along by __aaercy5451 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are 76 stories about this on Digg, for a service that's been around for seven months already. see http://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?ctx= gmail&hl=en&answer=18219

    Nothing to see here, move along!

  37. Re:Uh oh....Can you smell what the Google is cooki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could've just unticked the box that says "Show my web clips above the Inbox", sheesh.

  38. Not at all by denjin · · Score: 1

    I've used it behind websense, a pix, an ssh socks4 proxy, garbage firewalls, etc., and I've never had a problem.

  39. Re:Can't say I was overly impressed this morning.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I opened it up and was like wha?? but then i noticed it was RSS feeds! It was cool, yes, except that it had automatically been filled up with like two dozen subscriptions I didn't need. I removed almost all except obviously Slashdot =P I think I will like having maybe three or four subscriptions in there, but definately not as many as I have in my separate RSS reader program.

    I think it's a neat new tool and I support it =)

    But maybe by-default it should be turned off? I know a lot of people who will probably never even look twice at it. Just because they're so used to the extra stuff that's packed onto things like msn messenger ...damn those tabs and that HUGE add at the bottom...I'm usually the one to point out hey...you can turn those tabs off! But they're already so used to them being there, that they don't want them off!

    This is starting to sound too much like a blog entry so I'm stopping.

  40. Yahoo... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1
    Was Yahoo News one of the default RSS feeds for anyone else? I found that a little odd...

    On a side note, some accounts still don't have it. I've had it for about 5 days now.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
  41. It's crap by Snaller · · Score: 1

    You can't enter your rss feed address you have to search for it, great use that is.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:It's crap by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      Have you tried entering a URL in the search box? That worked for me.

    2. Re:It's crap by Snaller · · Score: 1

      You are SURE it was the URL you entered? When I try that I get the message "No feeds matched your search query"

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:It's crap by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it's possible it only works for pre-existing URL's. I'm not 100% sure.

  42. There's an idea by Mozzie · · Score: 1

    I think I'll use one of http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/08/174925 8&tid=133these and print the spam RSS feed on it!

  43. Did I come to an old \. article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using it for some months now and have rather enjoyed it. For sure it has bugs, and it has rather unfortunate default feeds, but it's nice. But it's OLD NEWS!

  44. Great! by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Now how do I turn the fucking thing off?

    I hate it. It displays more ads than feeds.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Great! by ClearlyPennsylvania · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I love it. And I don't see any ads. But, if you really don't like it, you can: 1) Customize what feeds you get 2) Disable it (go to settings)

    2. Re:Great! by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      *opens mouth, inserts foot*

      I've been plauged by the damn feeds since they started testing and there was no option to disable them until they make the damn thing public. I just hadn't bothered to check since it was relased into the wild.

      --

      Question everything

  45. Yes and Yahoo! Mail as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use YM (primarily) and Gmail. Even if it is true that Gmail seems to be experiencing some problems, it is not less true for YM which has been almost down for two days in November.

  46. Say that three times fast by happymedium · · Score: 1

    With how bad of a Slashdotting could Web Clips Slashdot Slashdot if Web Clips could Slashdot Slashdot?

    (Or take the question seriously if you're so inclined. ^_^)

    1. Re:Say that three times fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moa lold, lnow wy tongue isl in a knot!

  47. Nice, but where are contact groups? by Yort · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not sure I'll use the new RSS feature, but it's nice to have. I was more interested in the "shortcuts" on the side, where Gmail tries to identify things in your email like addresses or tracking numbers that it can give you links to.

    What I can't understand is why they haven't yet implemented contact groups. The single major stumbling block that most people I try to convert to Gmail has is that is is missing the (I would think relatively simple) ability to define a group of two or more contacts to which you can easily send a message. Heck, they could even make this Google-y and allow you to define terms with which to build a list, or label contacts as "Personal" and "Business" and then make a group from that. But the base functionality is so stinkin' simple, I just don't know why they haven't done it yet, and it's getting annoying to hear people I've referred to Gmail come up and say "I really like that new Gmail thing, but how do I send a message to a list of people?"

    1. Re:Nice, but where are contact groups? by medgooroo · · Score: 1

      Through add contact you can add notes or even create your own entry types... Google doesnt seem about the organisation of groups, the grouping is through searching. (if that makes any sense)

      --
      Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle
  48. Just noticed this today by tomcres · · Score: 1
    It lasted about a minute before I found it to be very annoying and turned it off. At least we're allowed to turn it off. Have to give Google credit there.

    But, Google, how about working on something really useful, like right-click functionality?

  49. Let down... by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    Just tried it.

    I think with all the new web2.0 widgets & tools the dev-shops are going crazy over, we are losing sight of basic UI design (i.e. efficiency). I mean it's Google we're talking about here, comeon guys you can do a better UI integration than web-clips!

    I mean for RSS feed links, nothing's better than a topdown newpaper view (i.e. a list) than left-right, AOL style.

    I'll stick with my trusty Sage plugin for FF.

  50. Re:Can't say I was overly impressed this morning.. by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

    The google version of my yahoo works nicely too. Not sure what integrating some feeds into gmail really does. Since gmail is a feed itself I never sign into gmail except to actually read an email.

  51. RSS in email by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    ... a stupid idea. For those who like to read their RSS feeds already I'll just ignore it and forward it with all GMail stuff to Outlook like I've been doing. Gmail is nice for the simple fact that it provides a location where I can find all my mail in one place. Other than that it's a bit too basic...

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  52. These new features... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... are great, but why the HELL am I STILL unable to search for un-labeled messages? Argh!

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  53. So much for standards compliance... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

    I use Konqueror 3.5 for my browser, but I have to switch to FX to use Gmail properly. First, i have to impersonate Safari or FX to get the standard interface, and even then it's broken. Considering that Konqueror 3.5 passes the Acid2 test, it seems like Konqueror would put as much effort in these areas as well.
    So much for standards compliance...

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  54. Re:Can't say I was overly impressed this morning.. by KanSer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this today and got rid of it as fast as I fucking could. I use Gmail specifically becuase it _DOESN'T_ bother me with annoying fucking doodads like this. So thanks, but no thanks.

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  55. English - UK by tooth · · Score: 1

    Doesn't show up if you have your language set to english - UK, only English - US.

  56. Old News by kubevubin · · Score: 1

    Gmail has offered RSS support for months. Why is this article even posted now?

  57. lastest is the bestest by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    ... it loads the lastest title

    That must be double-plus good!

  58. Not only was i not impressed... by the.o.ster.66 · · Score: 1
    but if you have a gmail account, why not just customize your home page? it's a much better layout (and suited for this kind of thing - moreso than a little strip distracting me while i'm checking my mail...)

    and has anyone noticed that a large chunk of /. material comes in after it's been posted on digg.com for a while?

  59. that did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks, now it works for me too :)
    just had to change the language tu Enlgish US...

  60. Google Reader by mu22le · · Score: 1

    I really wish they had integrated Google Reader Google Reader in Gmail, ending up with somenting like Bloglines, rather than this crappy webclips that comes in the way distracting me while I try to concentrate on my emails (yes, I just disabled them)

  61. How about supporting useful standards? by alexo · · Score: 1


    You know, there's a little thing called IMAP.

  62. +5 Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems more like -1: Rambling to me.

  63. Blogger Users Have Had This by TinoMNYY24 · · Score: 1
    My girlfriend was a long time Blogger user, and she had a GMail account before I even read about it on Slashdot. She's had these RSS feeds for at least 2 months on her account. She was also the first to get the rich text formatting, mail forwarding, and other things. I guess they implement the new features in the order in which the accounts were created.

    She still only has 4 invites though, when everyone else has 50, she's not pleased about that.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  64. Spam Recipes by Wieland · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did anyone else notice the web clips offering "spam recipes" when browsing the spam folder?