There is nothing 'gay' about the rainbow. Just because a group of perverts got together, took over the APA and FORCED it to redefine homosexuality as 'normal', and then terrorised the rest of us into submission, by threatening to sack us from our jobs if we dared to say one word against the 'wonders' of homosexuality, doesn't mean it's normal.
If you have to FORCE people to do something, it means they don't want to do it. Most people can't stand gays and don't want to be around them. The rainbow is nature's most beautiful sight, and is nothing whatsoever to do with perverts taking it up the ass.
What sort of man substitutes another man's anus for a woman's vagina. Was the anus designed for the penis? Were two penises designed to 'mate' with each other?
Quite obviously homosexuality is a paraphilia, because your genitals don't fit together.
I'm not gay, but it seems to me a penis fits inside an anus.
Now, a penis wouldn't normally fit inside a nose or ear, or even belly button, so wouldn't that be more a pervy move to try to fuck those places?
And after all, woman like it up the anus also.
The truth is, you are like the people that used to believe the earth was flat and would put people to death who said otherwise. Nothing wrong with homosexuals, just people. The problem you are having is you obviously like to get it up the butt, and you feel guilty about it, because your religious upbringing. Probably catholic and the priest didn't molest you or something. But either way, you want it bad, but feel guilty, so you lash out in public.
Second, I hate to think what kind of twisted logic you used that leads to the conclusion "if you have a license to use part of the spectrum, everything you do (including that not using any of the spectrum) must be free".
Third, "NBC" does not have a license to broadcast over the airwaves, their affiliated stations do (yes, in some markets the affiliates may be owned by NBC).
Fourth, I am guessing that you also have a license given to you - to drive on the roads (which belong to the people). Does that mean that you are somehow obligated to give a ride (for free) to everyone that asks? Oh, and BTW - we also get to park in your driveway and camp out on your lawn too, because, you know, you do have that driver's license.
Fifth, NBC paid a whole lot of money to be able to carry the Olympics. They did this for one reason - to make money. Who are you to 'demand' that they give it away for free?
Last, do you know what the 'mono' in 'monopoly' means? It doesn't mean "choices I don't like". Don't like the choices? Too bad, but you do have choices.
Or maybe people want to actually watch the olympics when it happens, not buy it later.
Yes, I have choice. It's circumvent the block to watch it from the BBC, or download it from thepiratebay.se or similiar sites. (I like usenet myself).
NBC paid a whole bunch of money to be dicks about anyone else watching it. So fuck them.
Sooner or later, the Networks are going to finally understand that people can get the shit for free now, so why the fuck are we going to wait to buy it later?
you no longer hit start to stop your computer for one
The launch menu button hasn't been labeled "Start" since Windows XP. Sure, most of us still call it the Start Menu out of habit, and the icon used to bring it up is officially known as the "Start Orb", but your talking points are 6 years out of date.
My Windows 7 says Start on the start menu button on the taskbar.
I'm in Classic Mode, but it says Start, so wtf willis?
I'm not being sarcastic, I really am curious. There was a HUGE amount of hype around the release (the usual "WoW killer" stuff that seems to accompany any major MMO release these days). Reviews seemed generally positive. Everyone was talking about it for a week or two after release. But then I stopped hearing anything about it. Don't think I've heard anyone mention it for a while. Considering this was supposed to be the game that finally fixed Sony's Galaxies fiasco, I expected more enthusiasm.
I do like the free-to-play stuff, though. And this might lead me to try it out. I just hope they don't cripple it to the point where it's hard to get an idea of what the paid game looks like (like some MMO's do--some that have initials like "W.O.W.," maybe).
It started having a Free Trial and I checked it out, and I don't understand what is special about it. It's sort of boring and it has way the fuck too many cutscenes. Nothing takes you out of a MMORPG like prerendered cutscenes.
Not really that fun, 4 different classes that are lame.
Saying I'm an atheist is ok, saying you are stupid because you believe in god is not.
What about someone saying that you will burn in hell for eternity because you are an atheist?
I'd rather burn in Hell for eternity then spend 1 day with any Christians, mainly if they were to be right, omg, I could not do with the smuggness then.
I am dead serious. If Christianity was real, I'd rather burn in hell then worship your lame ass god.
As a Christian and an American, it seems obvious to me that in order to have a free society, both Christians and Atheists must be free to criticize each others viewpoints in the public square of ideas. Otherwise, how does anyone have freedom of religion (or the freedom not to have a religion)?
I certainly wouldn't want to be arrested for quoting the Bible: "The fool says in his heart, there is no God." And if I want that freedom, I must allow Atheists the same freedom.
I find Christians to be offensive, you should be arrest and fed to lions.
Older consoles were not particularly complex and used moderately common parts so you could hack them and make your own games since things were generally well documented.
These days consoles are generally far more powerful than your average PC with custom hardware (so you're not emulating it) and good luck making games without manuals, etc to tell you where to even begin coding. Without an emulator you can't code and test on your PC. Every change has to go through the process of loading it onto the actual console.
In addition, with certified channels, you don't need to go through the hassle. If you want to make games, anyone can for iOS and Android and if you have talent you can get picked up by a developer with the proper tools to work on consoles. XBox is pretty much a standard PC so you can use DirectX and if it runs on your computer there's a very good chance it will run on the XBox. MS released XNA to make XBox development accessible to people.
So again, the whole "homebrew" thing is either supported or not. If it's not supported by the console maker, it's just not worth the hassle. If you really want to get into the game programming business it doesn't matter what platform you work with. Most people now just use the PC, Android or iOS since that captures the bulk of the market and proves you value to any development company.
Homebrew hasn't gone away. The historical "hacking" aspect of that term has just been rendered mostly moot.
Wow, spoken like someone who's just guessing.
The consoles are NOT more powerful then PC's, do you even read what's going on?
Programming the consoles haven't been a problem. The Wii, Xbox 360, and the PS3 all have active "homebrew" and programming tools.
Homebrew is almost NEVER supported by the console developers, we hack the system, then get it to run what we want, then release tools so others can, which in turn, usually gets more tools released.
Sure, it's not big, it's not about making money, and it's sometimes a bit primitive, but that is what makes it fun.
Wii homebrew still gets made, emulators get updated still. It's slowed down, but after we hack the Wii U, I imagine there will be a bunch of new stuff.
Stuff still gets made for the Xbox 360, the PS3.
Wouldn't even need to ask the question if you googled the various scenes.
I don't even have to make clever ones, just some of the most common names in the world will work.
I don't want any of you to know who I am, if I did, you'd probably be a friend of mine. Not one of you needs to know what my last name is, and if I am, or am not famous. It's none of your fucking business unless I decide to tell you.
Maybe we should use numbers instead of names, or I know, we'll all go by our Social Security numbers.
In other words, the money that the Court awarded to compensate artists and rightsholders for their losses is not going to the artists at all.
This is not a logical conclusion. If anti-piracy activities increase future sales by detering illegal copying, the artists will (proportionately) benefit just as much as the labels.
OMG, you drank the koolaid!!!!
illegal copying has nothing to do with losing a sale. In fact, studies that they try to hide, show that sharing music leads to more sales. And being someone who
.... Let's face it - there will always be at least 100 people who are stupid and/or desperate enough in America to enter some kind of ridiculous bargain like this....
I don't think you pay attention. There is 100 of thousands of people who would. Those same people that try out for American Idol and other shows like that, the cam whores on youtube. The reality TV stars. We have way too many people who will do whatever to be a star.
Kudos for being broad-minded and mature. But we ought to be old enough to not feed the trolls. The imbecile has already been modded to oblivion. All's well with slashdot.
This imbecile has more rep then you ever will have, modding me troll doesn't change anything. And it didn't change that the article has nothing to do with science, nerds, or news we need to hear. They don't even know how they are going to fight it, they don't even have a vaccine for it.
That is news? Of course we don't have a vaccine for it. We spend all our money fighting terrorism everywhere, spending 100's of billions of dollars on wars.
It will be news when that changes and the governments decides to start spending money on how to help people instead of helping the corporations get as much money from people as they can.
I don't come to slashdot for news I can get everywhere else.
This has nothing to do with tech nor nerds.
Soulskill, you need to rethink the job you are doing here, because you fucked up.
Uh, there's definitely a big science angle to disease outbreaks. So they problem is...?
Did you read the article? I did, it mentions nothing about science at all. Just normal shit. Outbreak, don't know why, people died, have to help, hopefully the help doesn't get it.
I don't care if I get modded Troll, my rep is so good here it doesn't hurt me. But it doesn't change the fact that this post really doesn't belong here.
Now if it talked about a new breakthru to help the outbreak, cool. But it doesn't.
I stopped reading partway through - it read like a hit piece. Let's go ahead and ignore the success of Windows 7, XBOX 360, Office, SharePoint, Lync, etc just to make an outrageous claim in order to sell magazines. Is the internal culture of Microsoft bad? Maybe..but they're still churning out good software, and with the exception of a one-time write-down from a failed acquisition, they are still one of the most consistently profitable companies in the world. Like all large companies, they have had product failures, but if you're going to ignore the wins, why bother even writing the article?
Maybe you should of read the article, then you wouldn't come off looking so stupid.
And weird, how someone with your low ID would only shrill for MS's recent accomplishments (if you want to call them that), and then ignore the facts.
Windows 7 is a decent OS, but they've already dumped it for Windows 8, which they are betting the farm on, with Windows 8, and of course, the Xbox 8. And speaking of Xbox, success story? Sort of.
First MS took a loss on the hardware sold. Then they took it up the butt because the hardware was failing. So, finally, 4 years after they introduced the Xbox 360, they got a version that doesn't overheat. Not sure where you are from, but I do NOT call that a success. No other console had to go thru so many updates to fix hardware problems, most consoles go thru hardware updates to make them cheaper and smaller.
Xbox Live is where MS makes their money, and in that, they have been successful. Except lately it's become very ad centric, so lets see how that goes.
But since you are too stupid to read the article (maybe because you are so old and need new glasses?), you would of seen it was about how MS has fucked up and lost the lead and innovation they once had. The article isn't about their successes, but namely, what they did wrong.
Just like you did wrong, by not reading the article and deciding to post.
This will not stop the terrorism that we are facing these days, and how much data storage will this entail? All of the torrents, Debian packages and music I have downloaded will be stored? Treating the commoners like terrorists.
I kept cable internet and dropped cable TV service for a year.
I reconnected last night. 1000 channels including HD service. Searching for "Nova" returned no instances of the PBS show; if I want to watch my favorite show, I still need to buy it from iTunes and download it.
Jury is still out on the other reason I dropped cable TV; I want to watch WWE Summer Slam in HD, live when it broadcasts (not three months later on DVD). It's not showing up in the listing yet; I'll try again two weeks prior to the event.
Haven't tried to find a 2012 BBC Top Gear; had to 'torrent last winter's shows because they won't even sell those to us yanks.
The funny thing is, Comcast never asked why I dropped TV service in the first place.
You can get the WWE PPV the next day, in 720p for free, and oddly enough, it's quality will be way better then any HD on Comcast. I have HD Comcast (I get it for free, would never pay for it) and depending on how many of your neighbors is using cable at the time, the quality of fast moving stuff goes from looking great in still scenes, too looking like a overly compressed mess of squares during action. When people aren't using Comcast when you are watching a fast action show like WWE, then it tends to look a lot better. How that works for your area, i have no idea.
... Three huge companies are competing against Netflix in the streaming arena, which has already surpassed its DVD-by-mail business. Amazon, Apple, and Google all offer streaming content as well. As movie and television studios began to demand higher licensing fees, Netflix will not be able to pay, while these tech giants will. Netflix will eventually be priced out of the market....
Sorry, that doesn't make sense to me. Are they saying Amazon, Apple and Google are going to be operating their streaming service at a loss? And since those companies have other revenues, they can afford to go on while Netflix will die? Seriously? Sounds like a really stupid business model to get into.
Here's my take on it: Most the major studios are/have ISP themselves, so why do they want to lose out on profits they can be making themselves? HBO Go They of course, aren't licensing their stuff to Netflix, because they want the money for themselves. Other studios are hmm, cut out the middle man, but the middle man is giving us money, so how about we just make it more expensive for him?
For example, if you use Comcast streaming stuff (which costs), it doesn't go on your 250gb cap. But if you use netflix, it does.
The truth is, the studio were really fucking slow to get on the bandwagon, and Netflix appeared to fill a need, now, the studios in the greedy grab to get as much money before the system collapses, are going to fuck the middleman until they are the only option left for consumers.
I honestly think the various Corporations involved in the Corporate Greed Policy, know their days are numbered, and are getting what they can, while they can, before enough people wake up and put a stop to it.
Slashdot Mirror
There is nothing 'gay' about the rainbow. Just because a group of perverts got together, took over the APA and FORCED it to redefine homosexuality as 'normal', and then terrorised the rest of us into submission, by threatening to sack us from our jobs if we dared to say one word against the 'wonders' of homosexuality, doesn't mean it's normal.
If you have to FORCE people to do something, it means they don't want to do it. Most people can't stand gays and don't want to be around them. The rainbow is nature's most beautiful sight, and is nothing whatsoever to do with perverts taking it up the ass.
What sort of man substitutes another man's anus for a woman's vagina. Was the anus designed for the penis? Were two penises designed to 'mate' with each other?
Quite obviously homosexuality is a paraphilia, because your genitals don't fit together.
I'm not gay, but it seems to me a penis fits inside an anus.
Now, a penis wouldn't normally fit inside a nose or ear, or even belly button, so wouldn't that be more a pervy move to try to fuck those places?
And after all, woman like it up the anus also.
The truth is, you are like the people that used to believe the earth was flat and would put people to death who said otherwise. Nothing wrong with homosexuals, just people. The problem you are having is you obviously like to get it up the butt, and you feel guilty about it, because your religious upbringing. Probably catholic and the priest didn't molest you or something. But either way, you want it bad, but feel guilty, so you lash out in public.
In Britain we all have to pay a T.V. licence fee. This money funds the BBC. Watching without paying is illegal. So you are "stealing". ...
Stealing? Serious? We are taking it from someone else so they can't watch it?
First, the OTA stuff is, of course, free.
Second, I hate to think what kind of twisted logic you used that leads to the conclusion "if you have a license to use part of the spectrum, everything you do (including that not using any of the spectrum) must be free".
Third, "NBC" does not have a license to broadcast over the airwaves, their affiliated stations do (yes, in some markets the affiliates may be owned by NBC).
Fourth, I am guessing that you also have a license given to you - to drive on the roads (which belong to the people). Does that mean that you are somehow obligated to give a ride (for free) to everyone that asks? Oh, and BTW - we also get to park in your driveway and camp out on your lawn too, because, you know, you do have that driver's license.
Fifth, NBC paid a whole lot of money to be able to carry the Olympics. They did this for one reason - to make money. Who are you to 'demand' that they give it away for free?
Last, do you know what the 'mono' in 'monopoly' means? It doesn't mean "choices I don't like". Don't like the choices? Too bad, but you do have choices.
Or maybe people want to actually watch the olympics when it happens, not buy it later.
Yes, I have choice. It's circumvent the block to watch it from the BBC, or download it from thepiratebay.se or similiar sites. (I like usenet myself).
NBC paid a whole bunch of money to be dicks about anyone else watching it. So fuck them.
Sooner or later, the Networks are going to finally understand that people can get the shit for free now, so why the fuck are we going to wait to buy it later?
Know the new market.
you no longer hit start to stop your computer for one
The launch menu button hasn't been labeled "Start" since Windows XP. Sure, most of us still call it the Start Menu out of habit, and the icon used to bring it up is officially known as the "Start Orb", but your talking points are 6 years out of date.
My Windows 7 says Start on the start menu button on the taskbar.
I'm in Classic Mode, but it says Start, so wtf willis?
The IBM PC was the one strange thing in that you could install any OS on it.
My TRS-80 ran TRS-DOS, UltraDOS, DOSPlus, NewDOS/80, LDOS,..
Mine still does.
A 35 year old script kiddie, no less. Who lives with his mother.
That's actually true.
Its perfectly normal for guys to live with their parents that long in Europe. Its traditional in mediterranean (Greece, Spain, Italy. etc)
that's the excuse I'd go with also.
About time we got some smart rulings.
I don't see why this won't apply to 3G or any other type of tethering either, since it's all the same.
I'm not being sarcastic, I really am curious. There was a HUGE amount of hype around the release (the usual "WoW killer" stuff that seems to accompany any major MMO release these days). Reviews seemed generally positive. Everyone was talking about it for a week or two after release. But then I stopped hearing anything about it. Don't think I've heard anyone mention it for a while. Considering this was supposed to be the game that finally fixed Sony's Galaxies fiasco, I expected more enthusiasm.
I do like the free-to-play stuff, though. And this might lead me to try it out. I just hope they don't cripple it to the point where it's hard to get an idea of what the paid game looks like (like some MMO's do--some that have initials like "W.O.W.," maybe).
It started having a Free Trial and I checked it out, and I don't understand what is special about it. It's sort of boring and it has way the fuck too many cutscenes. Nothing takes you out of a MMORPG like prerendered cutscenes.
Not really that fun, 4 different classes that are lame.
Saying I'm an atheist is ok, saying you are stupid because you believe in god is not.
What about someone saying that you will burn in hell for eternity because you are an atheist?
I'd rather burn in Hell for eternity then spend 1 day with any Christians, mainly if they were to be right, omg, I could not do with the smuggness then.
I am dead serious. If Christianity was real, I'd rather burn in hell then worship your lame ass god.
As a Christian and an American, it seems obvious to me that in order to have a free society, both Christians and Atheists must be free to criticize each others viewpoints in the public square of ideas. Otherwise, how does anyone have freedom of religion (or the freedom not to have a religion)?
I certainly wouldn't want to be arrested for quoting the Bible: "The fool says in his heart, there is no God." And if I want that freedom, I must allow Atheists the same freedom.
I find Christians to be offensive, you should be arrest and fed to lions.
Older consoles were not particularly complex and used moderately common parts so you could hack them and make your own games since things were generally well documented.
These days consoles are generally far more powerful than your average PC with custom hardware (so you're not emulating it) and good luck making games without manuals, etc to tell you where to even begin coding. Without an emulator you can't code and test on your PC. Every change has to go through the process of loading it onto the actual console.
In addition, with certified channels, you don't need to go through the hassle. If you want to make games, anyone can for iOS and Android and if you have talent you can get picked up by a developer with the proper tools to work on consoles. XBox is pretty much a standard PC so you can use DirectX and if it runs on your computer there's a very good chance it will run on the XBox. MS released XNA to make XBox development accessible to people.
So again, the whole "homebrew" thing is either supported or not. If it's not supported by the console maker, it's just not worth the hassle. If you really want to get into the game programming business it doesn't matter what platform you work with. Most people now just use the PC, Android or iOS since that captures the bulk of the market and proves you value to any development company.
Homebrew hasn't gone away. The historical "hacking" aspect of that term has just been rendered mostly moot.
Wow, spoken like someone who's just guessing.
The consoles are NOT more powerful then PC's, do you even read what's going on?
Programming the consoles haven't been a problem. The Wii, Xbox 360, and the PS3 all have active "homebrew" and programming tools.
Homebrew is almost NEVER supported by the console developers, we hack the system, then get it to run what we want, then release tools so others can, which in turn, usually gets more tools released.
Sure, it's not big, it's not about making money, and it's sometimes a bit primitive, but that is what makes it fun.
http://www.wiibrew.org/wiki/Main_Page
Wii homebrew still gets made, emulators get updated still. It's slowed down, but after we hack the Wii U, I imagine there will be a bunch of new stuff.
Stuff still gets made for the Xbox 360, the PS3.
Wouldn't even need to ask the question if you googled the various scenes.
Seriously, this is stupid.
Fake names are easy.
Bob Dobbs
John Smith
Jay Woo
J. Wu
I don't even have to make clever ones, just some of the most common names in the world will work.
I don't want any of you to know who I am, if I did, you'd probably be a friend of mine. Not one of you needs to know what my last name is, and if I am, or am not famous. It's none of your fucking business unless I decide to tell you.
Maybe we should use numbers instead of names, or I know, we'll all go by our Social Security numbers.
fucking retards.
From TFA:
In other words, the money that the Court awarded to compensate artists and rightsholders for their losses is not going to the artists at all.
This is not a logical conclusion. If anti-piracy activities increase future sales by detering illegal copying, the artists will (proportionately) benefit just as much as the labels.
OMG, you drank the koolaid!!!!
illegal copying has nothing to do with losing a sale. In fact, studies that they try to hide, show that sharing music leads to more sales.
And being someone who
.... Let's face it - there will always be at least 100 people who are stupid and/or desperate enough in America to enter some kind of ridiculous bargain like this. ...
I don't think you pay attention. There is 100 of thousands of people who would. Those same people that try out for American Idol and other shows like that, the cam whores on youtube. The reality TV stars. We have way too many people who will do whatever to be a star.
I guess the researcher for the article hasn't read this story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16011748
See? That link above is a worthy story for slashdot. It has science.
The story about the outbreak? No FUCKING SCIENCE. or nerds
or vagina
Kudos for being broad-minded and mature. But we ought to be old enough to not feed the trolls. The imbecile has already been modded to oblivion. All's well with slashdot.
This imbecile has more rep then you ever will have, modding me troll doesn't change anything. And it didn't change that the article has nothing to do with science, nerds, or news we need to hear. They don't even know how they are going to fight it, they don't even have a vaccine for it.
That is news? Of course we don't have a vaccine for it. We spend all our money fighting terrorism everywhere, spending 100's of billions of dollars on wars.
It will be news when that changes and the governments decides to start spending money on how to help people instead of helping the corporations get as much money from people as they can.
I don't come to slashdot for news I can get everywhere else.
This has nothing to do with tech nor nerds.
Soulskill, you need to rethink the job you are doing here, because you fucked up.
Uh, there's definitely a big science angle to disease outbreaks. So they problem is...?
Did you read the article? I did, it mentions nothing about science at all. Just normal shit. Outbreak, don't know why, people died, have to help, hopefully the help doesn't get it.
I don't care if I get modded Troll, my rep is so good here it doesn't hurt me. But it doesn't change the fact that this post really doesn't belong here.
Now if it talked about a new breakthru to help the outbreak, cool. But it doesn't.
It doesn't even talk about any science.
So again, what is it doing here?
I don't come to slashdot for news I can get everywhere else.
This has nothing to do with tech nor nerds.
Soulskill, you need to rethink the job you are doing here, because you fucked up.
I stopped reading partway through - it read like a hit piece. Let's go ahead and ignore the success of Windows 7, XBOX 360, Office, SharePoint, Lync, etc just to make an outrageous claim in order to sell magazines. Is the internal culture of Microsoft bad? Maybe..but they're still churning out good software, and with the exception of a one-time write-down from a failed acquisition, they are still one of the most consistently profitable companies in the world. Like all large companies, they have had product failures, but if you're going to ignore the wins, why bother even writing the article?
Maybe you should of read the article, then you wouldn't come off looking so stupid.
And weird, how someone with your low ID would only shrill for MS's recent accomplishments (if you want to call them that), and then ignore the facts.
Windows 7 is a decent OS, but they've already dumped it for Windows 8, which they are betting the farm on, with Windows 8, and of course, the Xbox 8. And speaking of Xbox, success story? Sort of.
First MS took a loss on the hardware sold. Then they took it up the butt because the hardware was failing. So, finally, 4 years after they introduced the Xbox 360, they got a version that doesn't overheat. Not sure where you are from, but I do NOT call that a success. No other console had to go thru so many updates to fix hardware problems, most consoles go thru hardware updates to make them cheaper and smaller.
Xbox Live is where MS makes their money, and in that, they have been successful. Except lately it's become very ad centric, so lets see how that goes.
But since you are too stupid to read the article (maybe because you are so old and need new glasses?), you would of seen it was about how MS has fucked up and lost the lead and innovation they once had. The article isn't about their successes, but namely, what they did wrong.
Just like you did wrong, by not reading the article and deciding to post.
This will not stop the terrorism that we are facing these days, and how much data storage will this entail? All of the torrents, Debian packages and music I have downloaded will be stored? Treating the commoners like terrorists.
The Government is the true terrorist.
...and got a divide by zero error.
I kept cable internet and dropped cable TV service for a year.
I reconnected last night. 1000 channels including HD service.
Searching for "Nova" returned no instances of the PBS show; if I want to watch my favorite show, I still need to buy it from iTunes and download it.
Jury is still out on the other reason I dropped cable TV; I want to watch WWE Summer Slam in HD, live when it broadcasts (not three months later on DVD).
It's not showing up in the listing yet; I'll try again two weeks prior to the event.
Haven't tried to find a 2012 BBC Top Gear; had to 'torrent last winter's shows because they won't even sell those to us yanks.
The funny thing is, Comcast never asked why I dropped TV service in the first place.
You can get the WWE PPV the next day, in 720p for free, and oddly enough, it's quality will be way better then any HD on Comcast. I have HD Comcast (I get it for free, would never pay for it) and depending on how many of your neighbors is using cable at the time, the quality of fast moving stuff goes from looking great in still scenes, too looking like a overly compressed mess of squares during action. When people aren't using Comcast when you are watching a fast action show like WWE, then it tends to look a lot better. How that works for your area, i have no idea.
Man, seriously peeps, wtf.
So a woman is coming to work with you. Ya?
Pretend it's your fucking mom or sister if you can't handle it.
Seriously, I don't even understand the mentality of most of you if this is even remotely a problem.
Get a fucking life.
I'm not saying lets kill all the stupid people, I'm just suggesting we remove all the warning labels and let nature sort it out.
Seems to me the stupid people aren't reading the warning labels anyways.
Sorry, that doesn't make sense to me. Are they saying Amazon, Apple and Google are going to be operating their streaming service at a loss? And since those companies have other revenues, they can afford to go on while Netflix will die? Seriously? Sounds like a really stupid business model to get into.
Here's my take on it: Most the major studios are/have ISP themselves, so why do they want to lose out on profits they can be making themselves? HBO Go They of course, aren't licensing their stuff to Netflix, because they want the money for themselves. Other studios are hmm, cut out the middle man, but the middle man is giving us money, so how about we just make it more expensive for him?
For example, if you use Comcast streaming stuff (which costs), it doesn't go on your 250gb cap. But if you use netflix, it does.
The truth is, the studio were really fucking slow to get on the bandwagon, and Netflix appeared to fill a need, now, the studios in the greedy grab to get as much money before the system collapses, are going to fuck the middleman until they are the only option left for consumers.
I honestly think the various Corporations involved in the Corporate Greed Policy, know their days are numbered, and are getting what they can, while they can, before enough people wake up and put a stop to it.
It's the sacking of Rome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome