I'm still in complete bewilderment as to how people get by on Apples with just a single button. I've used my sister's VERY nice G4, and it is just an annoying thing to have to select a file and move up to a menu to find info on it. Actually, the best 3 button mouse I've ever used was this generic mouse-in-a-box type things that had 3 buttons, no special shape, high resolution, and a PS/2 connection, cost me like 5 bucks. But I'm sure there are better, more expensive ones.
I've always been a supporter of competition, but its no surprise that NVidia is already kicking 3dfx, its always done that. I had a 16MB TNT and a V2 connected on one comp, but when the v3s came out I noticed that my TNT was still kicking ass. I bought a 32mb TNT2 Ultra to keep up with the times, and I'll probably be using it until Nvidia or 3dfx comes out with a card that has full (decent) support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Glide (all on one board). I was planning on buying a v5 for the release of Warcraft 3 later tihs year anyway, hopefully they'll have a v5 6500 with full support then. I don't mind shelling out 300-400 for a card that'll last me a good year or even a year and a half.
self-explanitory. my site is jcampbell.net, not jcampbell.net.us I'm not necessarily a United States only web-site. Generic TLDs allow for people all over the world to access international sites or future international sites by simply typing in www.*wildcard*.com, if I wanted to go to yahoo I would be surprised that I couldn't go to www.yahoo.com and get there, I'd have to go to www.yahoo.com.us/.fr/.whatever, its all about less typing.
How would I go about making my own TLD? I mean, what kind of stuff do you have to do to set up a computer for that kind of job? Personally I'd like to make.fart or.jihad, and for the more serious domains.nix or something. How could I go about putting my computer somewhere to become a TLD server(?)?.
I disagree to your disagreement, this is quite like the whole "Will the web destroy print" argument. Neither will destroy or negate the other. Digital cameras will never be able to produce the same results that regular cameras do with such things as overexposure (ever seen those night-time pictures of cities where the cars are just big red and white lines) and photography hase a history about it. If anything, I think the consumer market will buy digitals over normal cams, but for the professional -- there is nothing like the original. Maybe analogs will become obsolete (sp?) over the course of time, but with that process, many of the smaller things will be lost. Negatives have varying resolutions, you can blow-up or reduce them with little or no detail problems, whereas digital images can only be reduced in size. You can re-print negatives any time you'd like, have it developed poster sized or wallet sized, with a digital camera its just that single source image. Sure photoshop (which I am an expert in) has become the digital darkroom, but I would trust and respect my oldie cam more than my digital. Just my $0.02.
I've never really worked on a large project, but I've done some multiple format designs, and essentially I like to keep content separate from design. Try and keep the graphics-based text to a minimum and if you have to, use a small gif for it. What I did was have the multiple images in a sub-dir of/images (where the main text-free graphics are stored, like/images/en/de/fr something like that, and when you refer to the images use a variable to fill in the blank,/images/*variable*/filename.ext. But make sure everything works, heh, nothing pisses me off than doing a search and seing a damned cfm/asp/php/cgi error. But it's always easier (and faster) to import text into a file than graphics. I hate grammar.
Because I want to hear in full Dolby Digital, George Lucas' commentary during the Jar Jar Scenes. I'd just like to hear his take on the significance of Jar Jar to the overall effectiveness of the plot. Either way, it would be a very satisfying commentary, where he appologizes or talks of how "Jar Jar adds a truly realistic perspective of youth and innocence on the whole situation." or some shit.
right on I say, its kinda like asking your mom if she'll buy you some candy, and if she says no... you go ask your dad.
Err, law->theory
God I love that law, but I hate explaining it to friends -- good point.
Moron
I'm still in complete bewilderment as to how people get by on Apples with just a single button. I've used my sister's VERY nice G4, and it is just an annoying thing to have to select a file and move up to a menu to find info on it. Actually, the best 3 button mouse I've ever used was this generic mouse-in-a-box type things that had 3 buttons, no special shape, high resolution, and a PS/2 connection, cost me like 5 bucks. But I'm sure there are better, more expensive ones.
I've always been a supporter of competition, but its no surprise that NVidia is already kicking 3dfx, its always done that. I had a 16MB TNT and a V2 connected on one comp, but when the v3s came out I noticed that my TNT was still kicking ass. I bought a 32mb TNT2 Ultra to keep up with the times, and I'll probably be using it until Nvidia or 3dfx comes out with a card that has full (decent) support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Glide (all on one board). I was planning on buying a v5 for the release of Warcraft 3 later tihs year anyway, hopefully they'll have a v5 6500 with full support then. I don't mind shelling out 300-400 for a card that'll last me a good year or even a year and a half.
self-explanitory. my site is jcampbell.net, not jcampbell.net.us I'm not necessarily a United States only web-site. Generic TLDs allow for people all over the world to access international sites or future international sites by simply typing in www.*wildcard*.com, if I wanted to go to yahoo I would be surprised that I couldn't go to www.yahoo.com and get there, I'd have to go to www.yahoo.com.us/.fr/.whatever, its all about less typing.
How would I go about making my own TLD? I mean, what kind of stuff do you have to do to set up a computer for that kind of job? Personally I'd like to make .fart or .jihad, and for the more serious domains .nix or something. How could I go about putting my computer somewhere to become a TLD server(?)?.
I disagree to your disagreement, this is quite like the whole "Will the web destroy print" argument. Neither will destroy or negate the other. Digital cameras will never be able to produce the same results that regular cameras do with such things as overexposure (ever seen those night-time pictures of cities where the cars are just big red and white lines) and photography hase a history about it. If anything, I think the consumer market will buy digitals over normal cams, but for the professional -- there is nothing like the original. Maybe analogs will become obsolete (sp?) over the course of time, but with that process, many of the smaller things will be lost. Negatives have varying resolutions, you can blow-up or reduce them with little or no detail problems, whereas digital images can only be reduced in size. You can re-print negatives any time you'd like, have it developed poster sized or wallet sized, with a digital camera its just that single source image. Sure photoshop (which I am an expert in) has become the digital darkroom, but I would trust and respect my oldie cam more than my digital. Just my $0.02.
I've never really worked on a large project, but I've done some multiple format designs, and essentially I like to keep content separate from design. Try and keep the graphics-based text to a minimum and if you have to, use a small gif for it. What I did was have the multiple images in a sub-dir of /images (where the main text-free graphics are stored, like /images/en /de /fr something like that, and when you refer to the images use a variable to fill in the blank, /images/*variable*/filename.ext. But make sure everything works, heh, nothing pisses me off than doing a search and seing a damned cfm/asp/php/cgi error. But it's always easier (and faster) to import text into a file than graphics.
I hate grammar.
Because I want to hear in full Dolby Digital, George Lucas' commentary during the Jar Jar Scenes. I'd just like to hear his take on the significance of Jar Jar to the overall effectiveness of the plot. Either way, it would be a very satisfying commentary, where he appologizes or talks of how "Jar Jar adds a truly realistic perspective of youth and innocence on the whole situation." or some shit.
nice to see ppl staying on-topic