Slashdot Mirror


AMD Announces "Duron" Processor

Intoxicated Duck writes: "ZDNet reported that AMD announced it's Duron processor this morning. Looks like they're trying to compete with the Celeron. Wait! wasn't the Celeron supposed to compete with AMD?" What about overclocking?

209 comments

  1. And if you don't like it.. by Rombuu · · Score: 2

    ...you will call it a Moron chip.

    Damn, don't the marketing guys think of this stuff?

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:And if you don't like it.. by Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're trying to make it sound like the Celeron name to put it in the same market segment... or whatever.
      CelerON - DurON. I wonder how much it cost to "create" or buy those names?

      Either way I think it sounds silly too.

    2. Re:And if you don't like it.. by LordSkippy · · Score: 1
      Damn, don't the marketing guys think of this stuff?

      The real question here is: "Do marketing guys actually think at all?"

      I for one, believe that they only mimic and don't actually think on their own.

      --
      My karma is in a nose dive
    3. Re:And if you don't like it.. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      I wonder how much it cost to "create" or buy those names?

      Salon had a very good article on that very same subject. I was both amused and appalled by it.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    4. Re:And if you don't like it.. by Largos · · Score: 1

      >I for one, believe that they only mimic and don't actually think on their own.

      Couldn't that imply that they all bow down to some "First Marketing Guy" who created all this stuff in the first place?

      hmm....

      -Largos

    5. Re:And if you don't like it.. by DgtlGhost · · Score: 1
      Actualy, the way I see it, Intell made a Mid-grade chip to compete with AMD on the price, and AMD made a low grade chip to compete w/ Intell on the quality...
      I'm gonna hear it for that one...

      -Earthman

  2. Hopefully, the Dresden Fab is going into overtime. by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . .as with the current Q2 Sellout of AMD chips, and size of the "Value" PC market, AMD is going to have to ramp up production seriously on this Duron chip to meet demand....

  3. Duron? by Signal+11 · · Score: 4
    KAPLAH! The Klingon Empire fully endorses the use of this new processor. With it's large metal case it makes a sturdy weapons platform and is useful for sharpening your batleth.

    Much bloodwine was used in the creation of this ultimate tool - many of our warriors were killed infiltrating the evil Intel and stealing the Pentiumgram Schematics. With this station we will be the ultimate power in the universe! (oops, wrong storyline)

    Even the High Counsel likes it's smooth black design and holographic technology. The Duron sisters also appreciate it's diabolical looks! You will buy one today or DIE. KAPLAH!

    1. Re:Duron? by Enahs · · Score: 1

      Really; I think you're thinking of Palpatine's Imperial forces, which, being a Navy & Army that spans a galaxy, can whup the Klingons with one white-armored arm tied behind each Stormtrooper's back.

      For those who don't know what I'm talking about, there's a character in a Star Wars book named Kyp Duron who gets rescued from the spice mines of Kessel, gets turned to the dark side by a supposedly long-dead Sith Lord, goes searching out his brother who was an Imperial conscript, and ends up destroying the system that the Empire uses as its training grounds--his brother with them.

      Ugh--I can see it now "Lucasfilm sues AMD for copyright infringement."

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  4. Dual chip = 80's band? by Stiletto · · Score: 5

    If these were set up in a Dual-CPU configuration would you have to pronounce it Duron-Duron?

    1. Re:Dual chip = 80's band? by baglunch · · Score: 1

      zzzzzzzz...

      --

      Work is for people who lack the imagination to play.

    2. Re:Dual chip = 80's band? by budcub · · Score: 1

      No, if Barbarella used this chip, they would call it "Duron Duron"!

    3. Re:Dual chip = 80's band? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If these were set up in a Dual-CPU configuration would you have to pronounce it Duron-Duron?

      ...and you could make a "Hungry like the Beowulf" cluster of them!

  5. Yes, actually, like the Celeron... by pb · · Score: 2

    128k on-die cache sounds great to me. Any benchmarks yet?

    I'm in the market for an Athlon, at least this summer, and it's great to see AMD get the business, but if I could get an extra $100 of purchasing power with one of these, I'd happily get a sweet video card or a larger hard drive as well as a chip that performs about as well as the Athlon I would have gotten.

    In the meantime, I suggest the name for the "new" competing Intel counterpart soon to be marketed should be the Caveon, as in "Caveat Emptor"... :)
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:Yes, actually, like the Celeron... by Cary · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's 192K on die cache (L1 + L2).

    2. Re:Yes, actually, like the Celeron... by pb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it's the first chip I ever heard to have more L1 cache than L2 cache! (that's definitely a feature for the "value" market...)

      Not duplicating the data is interesting, what do they do, though? If data not found in L1, send data that will be overwritten to L2 cache, and read new data from L1 cache? If data not found in L2 cache, get data from memory, and write to L1 cache? Age stuff in L2 cache? I don't think it'd be too different, but it's weird... :)
      ---
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  6. ThunderBird by Foxxz · · Score: 1
    I think I'll wait to see some results from the ThunderBird CPU. Full speed L2 cache. I heard it was coming out in June.

    -Foxxz

    1. Re:ThunderBird by Anal+Surprise · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Thunderbird doesn't really offer that much, when compared against AMD's next two offerings, Ripple and Night Train .

    2. Re:ThunderBird by TheReverand · · Score: 3
      From this news source

      Intel is proud to announce it's newest line of processors, created to combine the speed of AMD with the iMac style of computer, The MD 20/20/86. The MD will come in grape, banana and fruit punch.

      Warning! Use of these processors in multiple cpu combinations, especially if flavors are mixed may cause your computer to be blurry-eyed, slow, late-rising and generally hungover in the morning.

    3. Re:ThunderBird by ravage · · Score: 1

      *choking on his morning coffee* Damn, that was funny! : )

      --
      -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."- Albert E.
  7. SMP? by night · · Score: 1

    Looks like a great chip. Unique cache setup (l1 has different data then whats in l2). Anyways anyone know if it will work with SMP and amd/via's
    new smp chipset/motherboard? If so goodbye
    bp6+celeron hello duran smp...

    1. Re:SMP? by fsck · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't AMD get thier Athlon chips going in SMP before they start castrating them and selling celeronized chips? I would rather see some SMP than low end crap.

      --

      Lars - ...I could always phone Linus when I had a problem.
    2. Re:SMP? by Tower · · Score: 1

      The chips *are* SMP compatable - we're waiting for the chipset (AMD gave guidlines and specs, but won't fab it). The Spitfire can beat the Athlon in some performace tests (like the Celery/P-II).

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  8. Duron Duron by Sonicboom · · Score: 1

    I'll stick to my AMD 5x86-133pr75

    Probably the BEST CPU that AMD ever made!

    --
    [Connection closed by foreign host]
    1. Re:Duron Duron by Mawbid · · Score: 3

      Hehehe, the string "5x86-133pr75" caught my eye and it took me a while to realise it wasn't leet speak!
      --

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    2. Re:Duron Duron by technos · · Score: 2

      It's a pr70 according to AMD, and according to comparisons between it and the old P60 I once had, the P60 is faster.

      What I'd like to know is why'd they release the 133 (and then orphan it) when the 120DX4 chips were selling like hotcakes?

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:Duron Duron by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      Funny - my 5x86, clocked at 160MHz, has been performing like a P90 for quite a few years now...

    4. Re:Duron Duron by technos · · Score: 2

      I never managed to get a stable overclocked 5x86.. Not even the one I had on the specially equipped PTC mobo.. What clock/multiplier/voltage?

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    5. Re:Duron Duron by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      What I'd like to know is why'd they release the 133 (and then orphan it) when the 120DX4 chips were selling like hotcakes?

      Did AMD even have a 120-MHz processor for Socket 3? I thought the only company that made those was Cyrix...and their 5x86-120 wasn't a souped-up 486, but more like a "6x86 Lite" that ran with a 40-MHz FSB in a Socket 3 motherboard. (I still have one in a Biostar MB8433UUD...until a few months ago, I had it configured with Linux as a dial-up router. I recently built it back into a computer and loaded OS/2 Warp onto it to play around with that...hadn't used OS/2 in eons.)

      IIRC, AMD had 100- and 133-MHz processors that were clock-tripled and clock-quadrupled (respectively) 3.3V 486s. I suppose that, while they were a little bit slower at doing their job, they allowed you to keep the PCI bus running at specified speed (assuming that your motherboard supported PCI instead of VLB). With Cyrix's 120-MHz part, you could either (1) underclock the PCI bus to 26.7 MHz and sacrifice performance or (2) overclock the PCI bus to 40 MHz and hope for the best. (I didn't have any problems with the UMC 8881/8886 (?) chipset, a #9 9FX Motion 531, or a generic DEC Tulip-based NIC at 40 MHz.)

      (Now that I think about it, though, AMD had a 486DX2-80, so maybe they had a 120 as well.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Duron Duron by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      It's a nameless motherboard, I set it at 40MHz clock, 4x multiplier. I can't recall if there was an option to set the voltage...

      IIRC the 5x86 was designed to cope with 4x40 MHz but AMD decided, to be sure of stability, to make 4x33MHz the offical speed.

      Only one month ago I bought a new PC - typing this on my brand new Athlon 600 system with Warp 4/FP12 :-)

      Reinout

  9. Wait, I've heard about this one... by Anal+Surprise · · Score: 5

    The amazing Duron (tm) non-stick processor. So hot you can fry an egg on it! And its patented non-stick coating means no scraping and easy cleaning.

    The product namespace is getting so crowded that we're eventually going to end up driving Dodge Urethras and using computers with the new Pederast Pro processor.

    1. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by aqua · · Score: 1

      This name is also startlingly close to the product name used by Avanti to market polyurethane condoms. I approve of that -- if processors have to have silly names, they ought at least to have manipulable ones.

    2. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by Tower · · Score: 2

      A while back, Nike had the 'Air Incubus', a women's sneaker... they changed that one pretty quick once they figured it out...

      incubus n. 1) an evil spirit supposed to descend on sleeping persons. (often to rape women)

      Oops!

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the ads would've been great. Women running away from Incubi, thanks entirely to the speeds they can achieve in the shoes...

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by bprotas · · Score: 1

      Evidently the namespace for online identities is becoming crowded as well, as we now have entrants such as "Anal Surprise"

    5. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      I agree. The are some strange names coming about lately. However, "Anal Intruder" would have been funnier as it is in reference to "Top Secret: The Movie".


      _damnit_

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    6. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by BanSiesta · · Score: 1


      "diuron:
      a persistent herbicide C9H10Cl2N2O used especially to control annual weeds"

      A coincidence? I think not.

      /Zeb
      Another Mega bytes the dust.

    7. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      I once worked for a company that made Z80 based X.25 packet assemblers/disassemblers and switches.

      They actually had a small 4-port version, called, you guessed it,

      a miniPAD.

      I didn't work for them long...

    8. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by andyf · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it's good they used the Latin word durare (the Dur- part), rather than the English word, hard.

      (Hardon?)

      --

      Photos of bits of the past hiding in the present: afiler.com
    9. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by abischof · · Score: 1
      Actually, it was Reebok who made that mistake.

      Alex Bischoff
      ---

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    10. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      "diuron: a persistent herbicide C9H10Cl2N2O used especially to control annual weeds"

      <rimshot>
      Hmm...such as celery, perhaps?
      </rimshot>

      (note to /. staff: %lt;sub> , %lt;/sub> , %lt;sup> , and %lt;/sup> tags would be nice to be able to use in messages...)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    11. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by Tower · · Score: 1

      Oops! egg on my face (better than grits down your pants, I would guess) - blamed the wrong large shoe corp 8^)

      Thanks for the correction.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    12. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by senrik · · Score: 1

      Actually Durex is the company, Avanti is one of their Products

      --
      "the difference between myself and a madman is that I am not mad" -Salvadore Dali
    13. Re:Wait, I've heard about this one... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Donny: What's a pederast, Walter?
      Walter: Shut the fuck up Donny!

      -The Big Lebowski

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  10. Ah well, I said it when i first submitted it... by SgtPepper · · Score: 2

    And I might as well say it now

    Duron, ron ron. Duron ron.

    ;)

  11. Gimmeee!!!!!! by zoth · · Score: 1

    If you cant beat them might as well join them, looks like AMD may be learning a thing or two from intel.

  12. ho hum by egregious · · Score: 1

    I'd love to put these in a beowulf cluster... :)

    IN all seriousness, isn't AMD having horrible supply problems already?

    1. Re:ho hum by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5

      In all seriousness, isn't AMD having horrible supply problems already?

      It depends what you mean. AMD is having far less trouble turning out it's high end chips (ie Athlons above 800MHz) than Intel is with its equivalently clocked PIIICu's, as evidenced by the chip availabilities. From the look of things, it's the K6-2/3 line which is pretty much already spoken for, so if you want one of those, you are probably going to have to search for it. On the other hand, you might as well get a low-end Athlon or a budget Duron anyway and you get the advantages of a 21164-derived FPU which scrags any Intel processor and a nine-way instruction scheduler. Oh, and against the Celeron, both the Athlon and the Duron have 200MHz buses in contrast to the 66MHz one on the Celery. Take your pick ... it's not hard ... I'll not rush you ...

      Cheers,

      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    2. Re:ho hum by kjeldar · · Score: 1
      Of course, if you're just playing games under Windows and don't care about uptime so long as SystemUptime > DeathmatchTime, you could buy one of the new Celeron 600s or 633s, once they become more widely available. They're multiplier-locked at 9.0x and 9.5x respectively, but their 66MHz buses can be easily increased to 83MHz, 95MHz, or higher. The resulting clock speeds are left as an exercise for the reader. *grin*

      The gaming benchmarks I've seen show a 1000MHz Celeron performing about the same as an 833MHz CuMine, all other controllable variables being equal.

      --

      J

    3. Re:ho hum by reflector · · Score: 1

      From the look of things, it's the K6-2/3 line which is pretty much already spoken for, so if you want one of those, you are probably going to have to search for it. On the other hand, you might as well get a low-end Athlon or a budget Duron anyway and you get the advantages of a 21164-derived FPU which scrags any Intel processor and a nine-way instruction scheduler. Oh, and against the Celeron, both the Athlon and the Duron have 200MHz buses in contrast to the 66MHz one on the Celery. Take your pick ... it's not hard ... I'll not rush you ...

      1) The K6-2/3 line is being phased out.
      2) The Duron IS an Athlon. Duron is the product name that was announced today at the AMD shareholders meeting for the low-end Athlon that is to compete with (and kick the ass of) Celeron. We've known about this chip for quite some time now, up until today it was codenamed "Spitfire". Expect a name to be announced in the near furure for the high-end Athlon counterpart of the Spitfire, codenamed "Thunderbird" (faster/smaller die/more cache). For servers/SMP, expect ultra-high end Athlon toward the end of the year that for now is code-named "Mustang".

    4. Re:ho hum by Yue · · Score: 1
      as evidenced by the chip availabilities

      It seems that shortage of A socket motherboards determines high availability of Athlons. I hardly and unsuccesfully tried to buy an AT form factor mobo with such a socket in the last month or so... Finally I settled for a socket 1 mobo with the promise that I'll have a PIII for it in early June.

    5. Re:ho hum by kaniff · · Score: 1

      I may point out that the Mustang is the current core being used by the Athlon.

      The chip being slated for servers and SMP is the Athlon Ultra. And is going to be based on the Thunderbird core. With full speed L2 cache, etc.

      AMD has three cores right now.

      K6 core: yawn.
      Mustang: current Athlon core. on-PCB cache.
      Thunderbird: planned Athlon core. on-die, full speed cache.

      AMD has several chips on their plate right now.

      K6-2: old budget chip. being phased out. only goes to 550 Mhz. based on the K6 core.

      Athlon: AMD's flagship chip. based on the Mustang core. 512KB of on-PCB L2 cache with decreasing cache multipliers as clock speed increases. 1/2 at 700 Mhz, up to 2/5 at 1 Ghz.

      Athlon Ultra: Server and SMP chip. Planned for Q3/Q4 this year. Based on the Thunderbird core.

      Duron: Used to be Spitfire. 128KB of full speed on die L2 cache. "budget" chip.

      Corvette: AMD's planned mobile processor. Based on the Mustang core, but in the Socket A form factor, instead of the Athlon's current Slot A.

      All these chips are based on the EV6 200 Mhz DDR system bus.

      By the end of the year, AMD should have a chip to counter every one of Intel's offerings. And it looks like they are quite apt to trounce all of them.

      Celeron: Countered by the K6-2. Who cares? The K6-2 utterly abysmal FPU performance notwithstanding, they are somewhat equal.

      Pentium 3: Countered by the Athlon. By the year's end, AMD will have a leg up with the 200 Mhz bus, compared to the 133 Mhz bus in use by the CuMines.

      Xeon: Intel's server chip. Hello EV6, compared to the Xeon's 133 Mhz bus.

      Celeron 2: Countered by the Duron. Same cache, but the Duron's system bus will thrash the Celeron's 66 Mhz bus.

      Mobile Pentium 3: Who knows? Who cares? No one overclocks their laptop. I think it's just a P3 in a Socket 1 pack.

      Got that? Good.

      RDRAM notwithstanding, it should be an interesting fight. I'm loving watching these prices fall. $75 for a 200 Mhz Duron, with full speed on die L2 cache makes me just wanna get up and dance.

  13. And in other related news... by red_dragon · · Score: 2

    In a bold move that some industry pundits perceive as a reaction to AMD's announcement of their Duron processor, Intel has announced the development of the Sherwin Williams processor, which combines the tried-and-true P6 core found in the Celeron processor with new enamel- and latex-based semiconductor technologies that the company claims will provide for "A more colourful computing experience".

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:And in other related news... by chaobell · · Score: 1

      Well, swell! I was wondering when I'd be able to get a processor that didn't clash with my sofa or curtains. Can they custom-mix them for me, or are the colors in the cans all you get?

      --
      This is a Chao. A Chao says "Mu."
  14. Over clocking? by +Majere+ · · Score: 1

    Why bother? A newer faster chip will always be out, shell out the cash if you want it. I rather do that then run the risk of burning something up, and be with out it.
    The chip sounds nice on lower end computers, but I'll stick to my PIII.

    -= Majere =-

    1. Re:Over clocking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NEWS FLASH:

      A PENTIUM III IS A LOWER END COMPUTER.

      END FLASH.

  15. Re:Actually...Duros(sp) oh well. by Signal+11 · · Score: 1

    Well.. the side of the Borg cube did have "Intel Inside" on it....

  16. Info from AMD's website by SgtPepper · · Score: 5

    the Press Release is here. And the FAQ is here. The Spitfire has come a long way baby ;)

  17. AMD processor roadmap by Meat+Factory · · Score: 2

    The article doesn't give the complete story.

    They omitted the fact that the Duron will be extended to allow 2-way SMP.

    The new processor will be known as the "Duron Duron". The motherboard chipset required to support it will be known as "Da-Doo Ron Ron"

    1. Re:AMD processor roadmap by CoJoNEs · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any info about SMP support. If this is the case WOOHOO!

    2. Re:AMD processor roadmap by Falcula · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that have been funnier as "Da DUO Ron Ron?"

    3. Re:AMD processor roadmap by reflector · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any info about SMP support. If this is the case WOOHOO!

      Um, that was supposed to be a joke.
      Don't expect SMP until Q4.

  18. This was the Spitfire by Oscarfish · · Score: 3
    Spitfire was the internal name for this processor, just as Katmai/Coppermine were for P III chips. Spitfire is for the "value" segment while Thunderbird will be the new performance unit. Spitfire/Duron will have Integrated L2, a .18 micron fab process, and a "Socket A" packaging. Sounds a lot like the Celeron 2 to me.

    Here is Anand's Comdex '99 coverage, which is an excellent resource for those wanting to know more about AMD's future.

    --

    --------

    Oscarfish.com: tropical fish with attitude. Way t

    1. Re:This was the Spitfire by British · · Score: 1

      They should have named it Vitesse or Herald. That way, along with the Spitfire, their processor(along with the K5-7) names would be consistent with Triumph car names.

    2. Re:This was the Spitfire by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the internal names are generally better than the names that the marketing drones eventually stick on them Itanium/(even williamette or Foster is better I still think they missed their chance with the Sexium), Duron/Spitfire, PIII/Coppermine. I know they want to build name recognition and have a trademark on the name, but that leads to these stupid ass lamer made up names that no one likes, but wow we can legally protect the name (like anyone should want to).

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  19. Re:The use and necessity of overclocking? Safe? by luge · · Score: 1

    I hate to sound like a newbie here, but pants-shitting? eh? Is this some kind of variation on grits in pants or what?
    ~luge(OT, but whatever...)

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

  20. Intel announces Gowron chip! Long live the empire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The treachery of the Duron clan will not go unanswered!

  21. AMD naming by Jonavin · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has noticed this, A M D has A-thlon at the top and D-uron at the bottom. My questions is what's in the middle? M-oron?

    1. Re:AMD naming by pohl · · Score: 1

      Hardon

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    2. Re:AMD naming by jcampbell · · Score: 1

      Moron

    3. Re:AMD naming by suss · · Score: 1

      Hardon
      Ah yes, the 'multimedia' CPU especially optimized for net-p0rn...

  22. I've given up by Frac · · Score: 1
    I submitted the SAME EXACT STORY this morning at 6am, with complete links to the amd website, duron web page, duron press release. 10 hours after my submission got rejected, I see this.

    Slashdot admins - I know you guys don't read this, since you guys make so many double posts, but if the rare chance that you do see this post, read this - you're not encouraging people to submit news. Eventually all the people that send you timely and interesting news are going to quit out of frustration, and you're going to only get hot grits news submissions.

    Go get your free Palm V (25 referrals needed only!)

    1. Re:I've given up by SgtPepper · · Score: 2

      I don't normally bitch about slashdot, it's a pretty good shop, but I must admit, I agree with this... Sometimes i'm suprised by the submissions they end up posting, when I /know/ a better one was submitted, and rejected, not necessarily mine, but someone elses.

      Ah well, what can you do though, really?

    2. Re:I've given up by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      I think that Cmdr Tacho already responded to this style of complaint elsewhere. They often batch news stories and then stagger their release. The result from our end is that what looks like a scoop is actually old (but unreleased) news.
      --

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:I've given up by PerlGeek · · Score: 1
      "Ah well, what can you do though, really?"

      Well, there's... http://www.kuro5hin.org/ where they let readers vote for which submitted stories should reach the front page, and then there's http://theGEEK.org/ which is also pretty cool.

      Don't get me wrong, I love Slashdot. When I want to read news, I come to /. but when I want to write news, I got to theGEEK or kuro5in.

    4. Re:I've given up by SlashdotSuxAss · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid that's been the case here for the past few months, at least.

      There still seems to be a bit of backlash amongst a number of readers about CmdrTaco's "Tech Crash Is Totally Off Topic" bit and then the Voices from the Hellmouth deal.

      It's not at all clear to me anymore what constitutes "valid" news for the site, or what kind of timeliness to expect. If you really want the latest general-purpose tech news, you're probably going to get it faster somewhere else.

    5. Re:I've given up by Silverpike · · Score: 2
      Okay, this is one post too many with this kind of gripe. To be honest I am very tired of seeing them. Something needs to be said about this, so it might as well be me.

      I respect your right to post your opinion on this subject in the Slashdot forum. However, there is a lot that needs to be said in defense of the Slashdot admins. The following important facts are never considered in posts like yours:

      They are only human, they also make mistakes.

      There are several different admins, not just one of them. Sometimes they don't each know what the other admins have reviewed or posted recently. One admin may accept a story another rejects.

      Guestimating the amount of crap they must have to filter out on a daily basis, I figure their record is pretty good.

      They probably gauge the importance of a topic on how many submissions they get. Being the first submitter gets you nothing. If you are the first one (or the only one), you probably won't get the credit unless it's earth-shattering news.

      If you feel slighted by having them reject your stories, you really need something better to do with your time (unless you are a journalist ;) ).

      If you're looking to make an impression on the /. community do it with well written posts rather than with story submissions.

      I do agree with you though about the double posting of stories (IBM supercomputing, patents). The last few have been only characterizable as gross errors.

      --
      The opinions I post here have nothing to do with my employer.
    6. Re:I've given up by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

      Why was this moderated as flamebait? hmmm... me thinks the ego's around here need some flushing out.

      I love reading slashdot when ever my cpu is busy doing something that sucks up all my resources. Been reading for well over 2 years, every day, and something sure does seem different.

      In anycase I hope the realllly cool submissions and posts come back to slashdot, right now its nothing more than I can find on any other hightech website. The only thing that differentiated /. from the others was the comments, but as of late those have gone to hell too.

      bpd

      --
      --
    7. Re:I've given up by speek · · Score: 2

      They are only human, they also make mistakes.
      Right, so let's have moderated story submission and cancel out human error.

      There are several different admins, not just one of them. Sometimes they don't each know what the other admins have reviewed or posted recently. One admin may accept a story another rejects.
      Moderated story submission, so there's just one queue we're all looking at.

      Guestimating the amount of crap they must have to filter out on a daily basis, I figure their record is pretty good.
      Moderated story submission, so we can all help out.

      They probably gauge the importance of a topic on how many submissions they get. Being the first submitter gets you nothing. If you are the first one (or the only one), you probably won't get the credit unless it's earth-shattering news.
      Moderated story submission, so the importance of a topic can be more accurately gauged.

      If you feel slighted by having them reject your stories, you really need something better to do with your time (unless you are a journalist ;) ).
      Moderated story submission, so we have no one to pin blame on for being rejected.

      If you're looking to make an impression on the /. community do it with well written posts rather than with story submissions.
      Ok.

      --
      First, make it work, then make it right, then make it fast, then, make it bloated!
  23. a poem by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    I remember Celeron and now we'll have to use Duron,
    If this this tendency continues soon we'll have a chip named pr0n.

    1. Re:a poem by bolthole · · Score: 1
      If this this tendency continues soon we'll have a chip named pr0n.

      You mean, something like a cpu that has blazing fast jpg and MPG decoding? Maybe even something that could handle decoding TWO mpg streams simultaneously?

      Oh wait, we have those already.They're called UltraSparc IIs. Been around for years now.

      Oh, wait... What does this say about sparc engineers, and the target market for ultra sparcs?

      :-)

  24. Hoo boy the times they sure are a changin' by el_guapo · · Score: 1

    I remember in the not too distant past when Intel pretty much kept AMD flapping in the wind, snarfing up market crumbs wherever they could eek out a niche that Intel didn't find desireable enough to pursue. Well now - hasn't the little step-son grown up to pop the step-dad squarely on the nose. AMD is now toe to toe on the high end and the low end. And I for one love it!! Could it actually be possible!?!?!? DOJ and Linux (OK, so they're not technically allies) throwing egg on M$'s face and AMD whupping up Intel!?!? I must admit a bit of glee as I sit back and observe...

    --
    mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
  25. Duron by Spyky · · Score: 1

    Well at least sort of have a story to the name. From the article for the readers who don't read the story

    The processor's name, Duron, was derived from the Latin word "durare," which means "to last."

    Well, its a dumb name. But at least its not a "Pentium" which we swear, has nothing to do with 5. Its just a crazy coincidence. Then of course they start numbering from there. Pentium II Pentium II, oops I mean Pentium III. Those Intel dudes need to get on the ball. Here's one to try:

    latin root: volo, volare - fly
    Intel chip name: volentium!

    I'm sure I could think of more, but its been a long time since I had latin and the only other word I can remember is "dominus - master". Probably not exactly the image Intel is going for ;-)

    Spyky

    1. Re:Duron by Tower · · Score: 1

      I like didactium myself 8^) It has what the french call a certain... I-don't-know-what...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:Duron by Kyobu · · Score: 1

      And Volentium has the added bonus of connoting wanting (volition), from the Latin word volo, velle, volui, meaning to wish or want.
      Alternatively, Intel could bring out the Stultium, Stultium Pro, Stultium II, etc. (stultus means stupid).

      --
      Switch the . and the @ to email me.
    3. Re:Duron by penguinboy · · Score: 1
      But at least its not a "Pentium" which we swear, has nothing to do with 5.

      Except for the fact that the Pentium was Intel's fifth major x86 processor. Here's the line:
      8086/8088, 80286, 80386, 80486, Pentium (80501 and 80502).

      There was indeed an 80186, but it didn't make it into many computers at all and didn't really contain any earthshaking technology. Years ago, it was used on add-on cards that needed lots of processing power. So technically, the Pentium was Intel's sixth x86, but it was their fifth significant one, as far as most people were concerned.

    4. Re:Duron by benthecat · · Score: 1

      Also, voler in French is the verb to steal.

    5. Re:Duron by zeke · · Score: 1

      Um.

      Pentagram.

      Pentagon.

      Pentium.

      See a trend here? (Despite the dropping of the "a" from the end of "Penta".) Admittedly it sounds like Intel was going for the new 5-sided processor. (Boy do I want to see the Socket they would use for that.)

      zeke

    6. Re:Duron by Spyky · · Score: 1

      Actually I was subtly making fun of Intel for once claiming that their chip naming system was not sequentially numeric.

      They claimed this in a suit against chip maker Cyrix, who made a 486 clone, and heaven forfend! called it a 486. Intel tried to make their chip "names" a trademark, since *obviously* they weren't sequential version numbers (286, 386, 486, makes sense too me ;-) ). Ironically, to make a trademarkable name, they came up with "Pentium" which is clearly derived from the greek word for five, which pretty much totally disagrees with their previous statement that chip numbers weren't going in a sequential order. Anyway, this is all old history now :-)

      Spyky

  26. Big deal. by Shoeboy · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the Cyrix M2 to be rebranded as the Moron(tm) processor.
    --Shoeboy
    (former microserf)

  27. Re:The use and necessity of overclocking? Safe? by Monkey+Whore · · Score: 1

    I overclock on a regular basis. The main advantage is being able to squeeze some more life out of your processor before having to buy a new one.
    Also, if you're proficient at overclocking, you can purchase the fastest at the time, and make it even faster.

  28. Wait a second... by Grant+Elliott · · Score: 1

    Weren't AMD's originally aimed at the value PC market? Does this company have any clue who they're targeting or why? Back in the days of the K6-II, each successive chip was pretty much just an overclocked version of the previous chip. Most of them ran quite hot. Are we headed back to those days? Doesn't the world have enough value computer hardware? AMD was actually starting to make a decent product with the Athlons...

    Let me make sure I understand this. AMD is pretty much the first company to mass market cheap processors. AMD profits. Other companies start manufacturing better cheap processors. Other companies profit. AMD makes good chips. AMD profits. Other companies return with even better chips. Other companies profit. AMD realizes they can't overclock their own chips much more. AMD has "original" plan: sell cheap chips. Rinse. Repeat.

    --

    "I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." -Richard Feynman

    1. Re:Wait a second... by SamThePondScum · · Score: 1

      AMD, like Intel, has two general lines of processors, those meant for the higher end, and those meant for the lower end. Athlon is the most recent, and, really, the first, high end type processor from AMD. Further high end processors (e.g. "Thunderbird") will be coming out Soon from AMD to propagate the high end. Duron ("Spitfire") is the latest low end processor--it just happens to be based on the same core as the Athlon and really fast, so it actually compares to the current line of Athlons in preformance.

      Speculation is that the next Athlon will once again establish the performance difference between the low end and the high end...and, yes, that would mean that the new Athlon is going to be fast

      --
      -- PondScum, SamThe
  29. RONs by ivan37 · · Score: 1

    Kinda interesting they picked the same suffix: RON
    CeleRON, DuRON

    although the athlON is kinda close

    next they will be using IUM suffixes for their other processors...

  30. Everything you could ever want to know about Duron by Upsilon · · Score: 5

    OK, I'm something of a processor new junky. I follow this kind of stuff with an unhealthy devotion, so I figured I'd explain to everyone what this is before /.'s general ignorance about the subject (From my perspective anyway. Remember, I'm obsessed with this stuff.) starts to show through.

    What is the Duron? Essentially it's AMD's answer to the Celeron. Right now their answer to the Celeron is the K6 series, but the K6 core has short pipelines and is not very optimized for high clockspeeds. The bottom line is that the K6-2 currently maxes out at 550 mhz (and in limited quantities) and it's not likely it will ever get much higher. The K6-2+ and K6-3+ (mobile chips only, with 128K and 256K on-die L2 respectively and the additional 3DNow! instructions which were added when the Athlon came out) currently max out at 500 mhz, and I doubt they'll ever get past 600 before they are phased out. Even 600 is a reach.

    On the other end of the spectrum there is the Athlon. The Athlon is a brand new core that is extremely well optimized for high clockspeed. These things reach high clockspeeds so well that AMD has to underclock them to meet their contracts with OEMs (who request a certain number of processors at each clockspeed). Obviously the Athlon is where AMD's future lies, but they are considerably more expensive to manufacture than the K6 series. The combination of a large die size, the need for externel L2 cache chips, and the slot packaging adds to the price. Furthermore, AMD is finally making good money selling Athlons for the high end. They don't want to simply cut Athlon prices to sell them for the low end. AMD needs something else for the low end market.

    Enter the Duron. The Duron used to have the codename of Spitfire while it was in development, so if you've heard that name before you know what it is. Basically, AMD took the Athlon core, optimized it a bit more to shrink the die and lower power consumption somewhat (although it's still made with a .18 process, it's just that the basic layout has been improved), and added 64K of L2 cache. Yeah, I know, 64K sounds tiny, but it's really not that bad. The most important thing about this cache is that it is an exclusive cache. In most processors, the L2 ends up duplicating the information in the L1 and only uses the amount of cache beyond the size of the L1 for additional data. For example, a Celeron has 32K of L1 and 128K of L2, however 32K of that L2 is simply holding the same information as is in the L1, giving you a total effective cache size of 128K. The Duron is different. Being based on the Athlon core, it has 128K of L1 plus the 64K of exclusive L2, which holds entirely unique data. This gives you an effective total cache size of 192K, 50% more than the Celeron which is the Duron's primary competitor. Plus, the Duron is based on the Athlon core, which is simply a lot better than the PIII core.

    The Duron itself will be released in a "Socket A" package sometime in June. Socket A is just like Slot A (which the Athlon uses), only it's a socket. The reason for the socket is because sockets are cheaper and the lack of external L2 makes a slot unecessary. The launch of the Duron will be preceded by a couple weeks by the launch of AMD's "Thunderbird" processor. The Thunderbird is just like the Duron only with 256K of exclusive L2 cache, giving it a total effective cache size of 384K. This processor should offer a real performance boost over the regular Athlon and will eventually completely replace it. Indeed, Thunderbird is just the code name. It will simply be called "Athlon" when it's released. The Thunderbird will be available for both slot A and socket A motherboards, giving those who already own a slot A motherboard an upgrade path.

    I hope I didn't leave anything out.

    --
    I am not an idiot. Please use my name to email me.

    "That's right, I'm quoting myself."

    -Upsilon

  31. why wait? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I can make a $40 celeron 333 run as fast as a pIII 500 or even faster, depending on the bus speed. If it burns out then who cares? Its only $40.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:why wait? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Moore's law is about performance. It's not about economics. Nor does it dictate that everybody will automatically have to upgrade to the fastest available computer. Just because you won't get a speed doubling every 18 months doesn't mean that the prices on current generation CPUs will skyrocket. They will still cost the same to produce. Sure we may not be able to do that kind of inexpensive upgrading, but machines are fast and they will continue to be fast and there is (currently) no real reason to sit at a lower speed unless you just don't want to upgrade. Even in the future there will be upgrades that do not involve CPU speeds. Add more RAM. Offload certain tasks to dedicated processors (3D, I2O, etc.) Chips will effectively be cheap forever. They just may not be continually increasing in speed.

    2. Re:why wait? by billybob+jr · · Score: 1

      "Eventually Moore's Law will peter out. Then producing a computer will be far and above more expensive "

      Why? Proof?

      This statement makes no sense. Sure the the pricing structure currently used won't work anymore, but why would chips suddenly become more expensive?

      I can buy an ethernet card for 20 bucks. There is nothing like Moore's law (at least if there is, it isn't a driving force like Moore's is for processors) for ethernet card speed, yet somehow they are still affordable.

      Processors would become a commodity. Intel, AMD, Motorola, IBM, or whoever would continue to make them and sell them.

  32. Re:Actually...Duros(sp) oh well. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Heh. What if the ship is only 90% full of penguins? Does this mean that only 10% of the ship is really being used, while the other 90% stores penguins? "Normality has been restored. If there's anything else you can't deal with, you're on your own."
    ---

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  33. I du run, run, run, I du run run by criticalrealist · · Score: 1

    Who would have thought that AMD would have been inspired by that old 50's hit?

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  34. Duron = A Good Thing(tm) by tred · · Score: 5
    Yes, Duron is Spitfire with a cheesy AMD marketing name, but I can live with the name for the value. The high mark for price has been put at $175, and for clock speed is 700MHz. So we're looking at a 700MHz 128k full speed on die cache for 175 bucks. Where do I sign up?

    As for overclocking potential, my (not so humble) opinion is that it will be a hell of an overclocker. Look at the K7 - err Athlon, and this is basically a K7 with on die cache. Rumors were that the release of Spitfire - err, Duron, was delayed because it was actually beating the Athlon in benchmarks. So like the Celeron the clock speeds will probably lag behind the Athlon.

    As long as they overclock as well as I think they will, I know I'm getting one. As a hardcore overclocker (and op in #celeron, efnets biggest overclocking-based channel) I think getting a chip that's gonna run at 900mhz or 1ghz for less than 200 bucks is about as good as it gets. Don't be scared by the 'value cpu' label. This is the K7 core with faster cache, albiet less of it.

    Bottom line? They'll probably be faster than a P3 at the same clockspeed, for at most half the price. And that's without even putting overclocking into the picture. Don't you love competition?

    --
    - tred
    1. Re:Duron = A Good Thing(tm) by Nagash · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is very cool. There is only one thing that has to be done with the AMD processors and that's getting SMP going. If the Duron had SMP capabilities, it would be the coolest consumer chip out there.

      Sure, maybe you can do it with a Celeron, but it's not an explicit selling feature. It's not touted as SMP - it can only be hacked into it. I think SMP is the way to go for more capable machines in terms of multi-tasking without having to optimize the living hell out of everything. Plus, imagine all the fun you can have programming parallel algorithms! Woo-hoo!

      Affordable SMP - that would be the very cool thing. None-the-less, I'll probably buy a Duron, if I get the money.

      Woz

    2. Re:Duron = A Good Thing(tm) by PhiberKut · · Score: 1

      Well since the cache on the athlon is not as fast and not on-die they should make the athlon the low-end cpu and make the Duron the high end since it is faster... Its not that hard of a concept AMD!

      --
      Elijah Chancey www.elijahsadventure.com nomadic IT consultant, bicycling across america "all that you touch / and all
    3. Re:Duron = A Good Thing(tm) by paitre · · Score: 1

      Hey, dipshit: T-Bird is -replacing- the classic Athlon -before- the Spitfire hits market.
      Become a chip junkie, it's fun :)

    4. Re:Duron = A Good Thing(tm) by Pont · · Score: 2

      There are some market forces that are hindering the adoption of SMP.

      1) OEMs don't like the idea. Most home users, facing a slow and outdated system, will simply buy a whole new system. If there were space for an extra CPU, they might start plopping in extra CPUs and RAM instead of buying a whole new system. Just look at all the "Afterburner" type chips that let a 486 motherboard run a Pentium CPU. Now multiply that benefit by 2.

      2) While Intel likes it when big ass computers use 4 or 8 Xeons (the "Wait, why didn't I just buy an UltraSparc" configuration) because they make a load of money, they don't reaaaaally like SMP at the lower end. They make much higher margins on one cutting-edge cpu than they do on two celerons or even lower end Pwhatevers.

      Now if a Transmeta chip could do SMP, that would be sweet! Those things are tiny and low power. Having an 8 or 16 CPU motherboard wouldn't take up a closet or require your own hydro-electric plant to run. So a 700Mhz Crusoe ~ 500Mhz PIII. Who cares! Look at the price/performance! (I believe the Crusoe was either $35 or $105. Either way, cheaper than a PIII 500)

  35. From a Russian point of view ... by Poligraf · · Score: 4

    The name is lame :-(

    For an English speaker this Latin-derived name may associate with "durable", but for the Russian speakers it will probably associate with "durak", that means fool in Russian.

    As for me, I like the idea of dual Thunderbird better ;-)

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:From a Russian point of view ... by Firlefanz · · Score: 1

      As those processors are produced in the Dresden Fab, you should keep in mind that Thunderbird, Spitfire, etc... used to be planes that made Dresden a pile of dirt in WWII. So I rather prefer Duron, even if it sounds like a viagra competitor....

    2. Re:From a Russian point of view ... by / · · Score: 2

      There's a russian word "zorok" meaning sharp-sighted, perspicacious, etc. (masculine singular short-form adjective).

      --
      "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    3. Re:From a Russian point of view ... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      That would be Lancaster - a Spitfire was a fighter, a Lancaster was a big feckoff bomber.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    4. Re:From a Russian point of view ... by Gorgonzola · · Score: 1

      Well, you are correct in stating that Dresden was reduced to a pile of smoking rubble in WW II. But the Spitfire propfighter had nothing to do. Actually, the Spitfire lacked the operating range to get even halfway to Dresden from England. As far as I am aware there was no military airplane named 'Thunderbird' to play a significant role in WW II.

      --
      -- Spelling and grammar errors tend to be a sign of erroneous thinking.
  36. Dual Processors by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 1

    The AMD processor that interests me most is the Professional version, the one that supports multiple processors. I hope they do something innovating in this area. They made some great progress on processors, let's see if they can come up with some new ideas on multiple processors as well.

  37. I'll probably buy one... eventually. by qgj_rjimlad · · Score: 2

    I remember when Athlons were new; I bought one. And a motherboard. And suffered the consequences.

    I think I'll wait until this new 'duron' has been on the market a couple of months before checking it out. Just to give the motherboard manufacturers a chance to get things right.

    --
    ---------------- Take the red pill
  38. DMCA Announces Moron Prosecutor by belgin · · Score: 1
    DMCA ANNOUNCES NEW MORON PROSECUTOR

    DMCA promises staying power with Moron. The new chip is based on Congress prosecutor technology and will target citizens in the market for value HRs.

    By B. Elgin, Slashdot News
    UPDATED April 27, 2000 7:41 PM PT

    NEW YORK -- Digital Millenium Copyright Act Inc. promises staying power with a new brand of prosecutor designed for low-cost Human Rights.

    The prosecutor's name, Moron, was derived from the Greek word "mOros," which means "foolish, stupid." Moron was announced Thursday by Steve Case, DMCA's chairman and CEO, at the oligarchy's annual shareholders meeting.

    Moron, based on DMCA's (DCgov: DMCA) Congress prosecutor technology, will target consumers in the market for low-cost HRs.

    Moron will be available this summer in sub-$10,000,000,000 companies. (Already available in $10 billion+ companies.) DMCA will offer the new law at higher court speeds than its MPAA, which has topped out at $550 billion, but is unlikely to charge much more than the $550 billion MPAA, which was introduced at $187,000 in campaign contributions.

    The corporate benefit, the company said, will be low cost and much higher performance.

    "We want (companies) to know they've got something good and solid, and they won't have to spend another $1,000,000 in six months or a year," said Mark Bode, Congress marketing manager.

    I could keep going, but I'll spare you my very odd sense of humor...

    B. Elgin

    --

    B. Elgin
    "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
  39. Good old 80's are back... WTF? by Xannor · · Score: 2

    Why has the computer industry returned to a Ghz verison of the 80's?
    Sure the technology is better, but everything is becoming more and more proprietary hardware! Doesnt anybody remeber the goold old Pentium days, where you could buy a S7 motherboard, and then decide on a P5, Cyrix, Amd, or whatever the hell else you wanted for a processor.
    If one sucked, you could go by the other and plug it in, or if a better one came out you could by that. Now if you want cheap performance, you can buy a S370 and get a celeron, but if you want to upgrade you would have to buy a new motherboard. I mean come on at least the non-propritary software advocates should complain about this.
    I say open-source the hardware and go back to the good-ole days of mix'n and match'n! I say not only is Intel at fault but AMD as well. What about IBM ,what type of motherboard will you have to buy? Why dont we just all go back to SPARCs and APLHAs fo as similar as the chips are getting now. I say Phah! on the whole industry!

    --
    I sig therefore I am...
    1. Re:Good old 80's are back... WTF? by QZS4 · · Score: 3

      Well, back in the 80's CPU:s were soldered to the motherboard. The socket method wasn't used until the 486:s came out (or thereabouts), which would be in the early 90's.

      Hell, in the early 80's even the memory was soldered to the motherboard, to upgrade you had to use an (expensive) ISA-card. Same for CPUs, there were 286 plugin cards for the 8086es.

      If you want a truly modular computer, go get a PCI backplane, a CPU card, a disk controller card and whatnots. Not very common in home computer systems, but they do exist for industrial PCs.

    2. Re:Good old 80's are back... WTF? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Hell, depending on the type of computer you owned, you had to SOLDER the ram (piggy back style) on top of the existing ram.

      My dad upgraded an Atari 520st (with .5mb of ram) to 2.5mb that way. He did a pretty good job too...the damn thing survived power flickers on the order of .25 seconds :).

  40. Hi, Troll 8^) by Tower · · Score: 1

    Haven't been fed lately?

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  41. try reading by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Do a dejanews search on alt.comp.hardware.overclocking and see how many people have burned out their cpu's. None. People have been running their celeron 300a's at 450 since they originally came out, and so far no ill effects. How can it affect the mobo to begin with? You can't just randomly pick a bus speed and burn out the mobo. Its designed to run at that speed. Instead of a cpu lasting 10 years it might last 5, which is forever in computer terms.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:try reading by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Overclocked CPU don't literally "burn out" unless you seriously failed to use even the most modest amount of cooling. They fail because of electron migration which causes various circuits inside the CPU to short with each other. You can't see any kind of outside effects from this.

      I have a Celeron 300A@450. Once the fan in my power supply stopped while I was playing Quake with headphones, so I didn't notice. When the machine finally failed it was because the powersupply overheated and a resistor died. The external parts of the case around the power supply were very hot to the touch, probably in excess of 200 degrees. However the CPU didn't have any problem at all and still works like a champ even though a) the power supply is within centimeters of the CPU, b) the power supply fan was the only case flow fan in my machine. (Yes there is a fan on the CPU.)

  42. We are Richard Stallman of Borg^H^H^H^Hthe GPL! by Cmdr+Taco · · Score: 4

    "Your software will become one with the GPL. We have analyzed the legalese of your software licenese as not being able to withstand us. Your lawyers are irrelevent! Resistance is futile! Your archaic programming practices are authority driven! We wish to improve outselves. You must comply! Your software will adapt to service us!"

  43. moderated submission queue by mattdm · · Score: 2
    This would be far far less of a problem if they implemented a moderated submission queue. It's working pretty well for kuro5hin, although that site is too new to tell exactly how it's going to go.

    This isn't the same as the question answered in the FAQ -- a moderated queue would address all of the problems mentioned there.

    --

    1. Re:moderated submission queue by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      That is a great idea... how hard would this be to implement... anyone know?

      I, personally, would like to be able to see what is in the submission queue and be able to give a vote for the stories that I would most like to see a conversation on...

      Slashdot bigshots... you listening?

      -- Dr. Eldarion --
      It's not what it is, it's something else.

  44. What the fsck ABOUT overclocking? by xant · · Score: 1

    From now on, can we just assume that someone says "what about overclocking?" whenever there's an article about a CPU? That way we don't have to read it every time.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  45. AMD Durex? by morbid · · Score: 1


    Does this mean I'm going to score if I buy one of these processors?
    Will it protect me if I do?

    ;-)

    Sorry, couldn't resist

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  46. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    great post, dude. it seems like we used to get more of these back in the good ol' days of slashdot. now we just get schmucks like me making useless comments.

  47. I guess this would be mostly an east coast thing.. by cswiii · · Score: 2

    ..but it's the first thing that really jumped into my mind when I saw the name.

    #include
    Imagine the marketing! With your new AMD chip, you can crunch your numbers blazingly fast, allowing you enough time to paint the town pink!

    ... or something along those lines.

    Ok. So it's been a long week.

  48. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by Gumby · · Score: 1

    You didn't mention the big deal about the thunderbird, that the caches will run at processor speed instead of 1/2 or 1/3.

  49. I used to have one of those by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    It only had a 2MB graphics card but it ran Descent 2 blazing fast, even at 640X480. I never understood why, but I loved that computer, even when my friends had PIIs. I think my dad donated that chip & motherboard to a charity, and now it's running linux and serving websites for several local non-profits. I'm so proud!

  50. My processor company. by tcd004 · · Score: 1
    Someday I'm going to start a processor company and name my flagship "Betsy."

    tcd004

  51. Duron? by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 1

    Isn't 'Duron' a brand of condom?

    --KMM

    =-=-=

  52. Re:Actually...Duros(sp) oh well. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


    Well.. the side of the Borg cube did have "Intel Inside" on it....

    Then Intel's days are numbered.

    --
    Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  53. Where can I get one of these? by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    Pardon my ignorance, but I can't find these anywhere. Where might I look for specs on one of these? Do you have a link, please?

  54. Any trademark problems? by m.o · · Score: 1

    However, instead of referring to it as Mustang mobile, AMD is now calling the mobile chip Corvette.

    They should've called it Mustang Convertible or something... Anyway, isn't such obvious usage of other companies' trademarks prohibited?

  55. contraceptive? by dr_labrat · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does this name sound like a brand of condoms?

    --
    The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
  56. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by empty · · Score: 1

    > The Thunderbird is just like the Duron only with 256K of exclusive L2 cache, giving it a total effective cache size of 384K.

    Does this mean that AMD will make only the Thunderbird, and bin parts--high yield cache becomes "Athlon" and low yield cache becomes "Duron"?

  57. Re:That's insane. by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
    AMD already produces second-rate chips. The last thing we need is a "light version."

    That's right, sir!

    We're preparing to send Sharkey a set of comparative Quake benchmarks showing how our new 826 chipset beats the Duroc when used with a 66bus Celery coupled with our Rambo memory patent invention product(TM)!

    Are you from the Santa Clara office?

    Blessings,
    Master Bait

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
  58. Marathon by Pope · · Score: 3

    No way!

    It's "Durandal" from the Marathon series!
    It will soon take over each of its users and trasform them into time-travelling space marines!

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  59. Competing With Intel by Kismet · · Score: 5

    If I were to release a processor to compete with the Celeron, I would call it the Asparagon.

    1. Re:Competing With Intel by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      why not the cucumberon?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  60. Want to sell those chips? by SaDan · · Score: 1

    They're not the greatest "Pentium class" processors AMD has released, but the were definately the fastest 486 processor you could buy.

    At any rate, if you want to part with those 5x86-133 procs, I might be willing to buy them, depending on your price. I've got quite a few 486 systems that could benefit from a cheap processor upgrade.

  61. Who the hell called it Duron???? by RelliK · · Score: 1

    You just can't possibly come up with a more moronic name!
    ___

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  62. That explains K6-III disappearance. by liberty! · · Score: 3

    I have noted that the K6-III has disappeared from the stores, and this explains it. It is a matter of product positioning. The K6-III had more cache, and fit the SS7 socket, but had a larger die than the K6-2. Why spend acres of silicon in on line 25 in Austin making K6-III parts, with a larger margin on the cheaper K6-2, when a new middle line processor is in the works.

    Ah, economics... The new part needs shelf space by itself, so kill off the neato part nearest it.

    --
    Free the mallocs!
    1. Re:That explains K6-III disappearance. by kjeldar · · Score: 1
      Actually, the reason for the K6-III's disappearance is that AMD couldn't get any more clock out of the .25 micron process. K6-IIIs are only available clocked at 400MHz and 450MHz for a reason. The newer .18 micron K6-2s are essentially K6-IIIs renamed for marketing reasons (the relative success of the older K6-2s and the relative failure of the K6-IIIs).

      IIRC.

      --

      J

    2. Re:That explains K6-III disappearance. by Peter+Eckersley · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't quite what happened.

      The K6-III is basically a K6-II with more cache. They were getting miserable yields from the K6-III production lines, and had to rebadge most of them as K6-IIs.

  63. Only one unit of durability? by Noel · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll have to wait for the Dura to come out. I need more than just *one* unit of durability -- on any scale you wish to use!

  64. Re:PHIRST by L33T_L1NUX_H4X0R · · Score: 1

    PHUK U YUO LLEMA B1TCH!!!!!~! I WI;L KILL YUO!!! YOU PRABABLE USE WINDOZE U LAMER!!! SLASHEDOT IZ 0NLY PHOR UZ 31337 LINUX PPL. I WILL USE MI AOL PUNTER & STEEL YOURE CONNECTSHUN! I WILL 0WN J00!!!

  65. Re:The use and necessity of overclocking? Safe? by B-B · · Score: 1

    Hello /. terminal. I am a Mac user, but no, I do not hate you. I think you have some very misguided opinions of the Mac. Maybe (and I am only guessing) you have not really used one in some time. Correction below:

    "As far as macs go yes I do have a bias. A superior hardware set perhaps, "

    Totally superior in terms of QoS. Never had a system with a HW failure or IRQ setting problem. PnP that works. nuff said.

    "a good OS I do not believe (I have my own ideas about a user interface and that there should be an option to use a GUI or not)"

    Agree. Now 'bout that OS-X...

    ", good upgradeability (well it may be upgradeable but it's far easier and more documented to upgrade a IBM PC and compatable machine "

    No. Vendors sell a good array of g3 and g4 upgrades. I can even upgrade 6+ year old Macs to a current Porcessor. Can you upgrade a 386 to a p-iii?

    "(I have a book at home that is at least 1000+ pages on the subject and there are literally thousands more), "

    Hey wow, me too. Mac Upgrade and Repair Bible.

    "also cost is a factor. "

    You get what you pay for.

    "Simply I will run anything that has modern applications, "

    Like Photoshop, Illustrator, Quark, Office, Flash, Dreamweaver, Director, Final Cut Pro...

    "will run linux and dosn't cost more than a cheap price. "

    Linux PPC, Yellow Dog, SuSE, Debian...

    "I can get a new PIII linux system from a vendor at pricewatch for around $600 United States Dollars now that with linux preinstalled. You can't say that about a Mac and at the end of
    the day I like a cheap computer "

    Get what you pay for.

    "that I can upgrade the most readily "

    PnP that works is not "readily enough"?

    "and that dosn't have a tradition of being a and holding computer for people who like pretty pictures. "

    Maybe you like to fight with your tools...but I want to get work done, fast and with a minimal amount of BS.

    Anyhoo. Do Not Feed the Trolls. They are looking for comments like you posted, just to get your goat. Consider the source and all that...

    Tom

    --
    Reality does not happen until you analyze the dots. -Don DeLillo (Underworld)
  66. Re:AMDs are great for Graphix by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    Excuse me for saying so, but how the fsck did this get a score of 3?

  67. Re:Intel announces Gowron chip! Long live the empi by Golias · · Score: 1

    I usually hate puns... but that was pretty darn funny. I wish I was moderating so the people reading at +1 could see your post, AC.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  68. Re:The use and necessity of overclocking? Safe? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    Jeez you weenies. Let the man post. He's usually on topic. Almost never trollish. You may not like the fact of his political/philosophical tendancies, but hell let the man speak. If you want to disagree, beat him up on logic or facts. Childish whining doesn't work.

  69. Re:AMDs are great for Graphix by cvillopillil · · Score: 1

    Whatever you think you know about these chips is irrelevant. These chips are dangerous terrorists that must be brought to justice as soon as possible. If you help us bring these chips to justice, we will wipe the slate clean. All we ask is your cooperation in bringing a known set of chips to justice.

    --
    no sig
  70. Sort of... by autechre · · Score: 2

    But then, in some areas it's coming back together again. The new VIA/Cyrix CPU will use Socket370, and possibly later on both SSE and 3dNow! (thus making programmers' lives easier) Also, since the Alpha and AMD CPUs use the same bus, there has been talk of making them able to use the same motherboards as well. That would be interesting!

    However, in a way it doesn't matter as much. Yes, I do own lots of machines and enjoy swapping parts between them. However, what with CPUs having to improve their voltage/bus attributes in order to get better performance, many times a new CPU in an older board won't be doing its best anyway. I really don't mind CPUs being tied to the board so much, so long as my PCI cards, RAM, keyboards, etc. are still interchangeable. I don't think than CPU designers should have to limit themselves to several-year-old socket technology. Plus, if we try to get them all to use the same socket, then the advantage obviously goes to the mfr. who designs it--and the chances of getting AMD, VIA, and Intel together to design something are rather slim.

    If everyone behaves themselves and uses as little processor specific assembly code as possible, then we should even be OK when the CPUs start to have different instruction sets...though a lot of things will REALLY go crazy then (Sledgehammer vs. Merced vs. lots of older CPUs still hanging around).

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:Sort of... by kjeldar · · Score: 1
      Tyan makes a couple motherboards (the Trinity 371 and the Trinity 400) that have both Slots 1 and Sockets 370 on the same board, giving you freedom of choice between Intel and upcoming Cyrix solutions. Granted, it's not much, but it's there.

      Disclaimers:
      Yes, I realize this is semi-offtopic.
      I have no personal financial interest in Tyan whatsoever.

      --

      J

  71. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by ntsucks · · Score: 2

    2 more tidbits.

    Thunderbird will be manufactured with copper
    interconnects at the new Dresden Fab.

    Duron (Spitfire) will be manufactured with
    aluminum interconnects at the Austin Fab.

    --
    Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
  72. didn't we just see this? by ostrich2 · · Score: 3
    Great! First Real decides to nest a browser in their player nested in a browser, and now AMD is going to compete with chips designed to compete with AMD!

    Maybe the AMD chip will be just a little slower than the Intel chip for a little less money. Then, Intel will come out with a chip that costs even less, but runs a little slower. Then, AMD comes roaring back with a chip...

    Pretty soon, both Intel and AMD will be shipping out little pieces of cardboard with smaller and smaller corrugation. "Now, the Intel Celeron 7000 is just a little slower than the Celeron 6500, but what are you going to do, use both Megahertz at the same time?"

    1. Re:didn't we just see this? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Actually, most people who have been able to look at the performance numbers say that the Spitfire matches or exceeds current athlons. It's just cheaper to make a Spitfire than the current athlons (no expensive SRAMs, no plastic case, no pcb, etc etc).

  73. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by dufke · · Score: 1

    Exactly. And they are not the first to do this: Why do you think the Celeron II (by some named the 'Celermine') is physically identical to the Coppermine, apart from marking and multiplier?

    Not a stupid strategy either. As far as I know, large caches are one of the hardest things to get good yields on. When a small part of the cache is non-functional, it is convenient (sp?) to be able to sell the part anyway. Half of the cache is disabled, and you have an instant Celermine. (3/4 is disabled in the AMD case.)

    dufke

    -

    --
    __
    Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
  74. Addenum by dufke · · Score: 1

    Ooops, I realized something about the AMD case. From the start, there will be no Durons from Dresden (aka Fab 30) - only thunderbirds. But it's a good guess they'll be stockpiling these copper-intercon. high-speed Duron's for a rainy day. Like the day Intel releases a better Celeron.
    -

    --
    __
    Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
  75. Well, is it SLOT or SOCKET-7 ??? by MartinD · · Score: 1

    Well, is it SLOT or SOCKET-7 ???

    1. Re:Well, is it SLOT or SOCKET-7 ??? by vaportrail · · Score: 1

      Odds are, Slot A

  76. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by dufke · · Score: 1

    There have been conflicting reports with regards to this. Some say that there will also be thunderbirds from Austin. Rather likely too, since the lower speed thunderbirds will not need copper tech. Also see my cache bin posts above.
    -

    --
    __
    Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
  77. You're going to laugh even more by Poligraf · · Score: 2

    "Zorak" - there is no such a word (or it's some archaic word I don't know).

    As for the "brak", it has two meanings:
    1) Marriage
    2) Flaw, defect, defective merchandise.

    Looking at the divorce statistics, you should admire the wisdom of the Russian folk ;-)))))

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  78. Origin was actually in France long ago... by cronio · · Score: 1

    Durandal was originally the name of the sword of the French noble Roland in the 8th C. Roland was Charlemagne's (sp?) cousin if I remember correctly.



    One Microsoft Way

    --


    My plan is to pimp before they realize I'm a jackass. Hit 'em hard and fast.
  79. Asking SlashDot - WHEN should I buy it ? by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    This thread is mostly discussing the name of the new Duron. There is also some info about the processor itself.

    I want to ask everyone a question about a motherboard support. IIRC, some early Athlon motherboards were not perfect; some of them are on the revision 1.4 or even higher now.

    What do you think about the quality and stability of the motherboards ? Are they going to require a new chipset or they can use the same chipset as Athlon that is proven and pretty stable by now ?

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  80. Worst Name in Chip History... http://www.duron.com by Sir_Winston · · Score: 5

    I mean, what were the AMD guys thinking??? I love AMD, and I even bought a K6-2 knowing that a Celeron would have been faster, out of loyalty to AMD and dislike for Intel. But, "Duron"? Isn't that the name of a popular brand of paint? I believe it's "Duron Paints and Wall-Coverings" or some such. http://www.duron.com So, they've named their new processor after paint. Wonderful. Don't tech guys ever go into hardware stores? What is Joe Average going to buy, a computer with a fast-sounding Celeron processor, or one that sounds like it doubles as a listing in a paint chip catalogue. AMD, I love you, but call it something else.

    What was wrong with the code-name "Spitfire," anyway? The only other thing called a "spitfire" is an old type of fast sportster. It's a cool name, and counters "Celeron" quite nicely. A consumer sees "Celeron" and "Spitfire" chips and they sound competitive--remember that AMD needs John Q. Public to buy the chip, not just Slashdotters who know what they're buying beyond name. But, an average joe sees "Celeron" versus "Duron," and it's fairly obvious which one sounds better. Guys want fast, not just durable, and impressions count in selling any product.

    Again, I hate to put too much emphasis on just a name, but, it's a marketing nightmare. It's a paint company name, and it sounds slow instead of showy. Gee, sounds like it should be the name for the new Cyrix chip, eh? ;-) Come on, AMD, wake up and change it before it's a marketing nightmare. Joe Average doesn't want a computer that's named after paint he can buy at any hardware store, and Joe Average is the main consumer for this value chip.

    --


    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws."--Tacitus, *The Annals*
  81. Duron -> Durian? by questionlp · · Score: 1

    The name reminds me of a fruit called Durian (a greenish-brown fruit
    with spikes on it's shell)... as someone from Australia
    said on an OPB show:

    `` Durian... Tastes like heaven but smells like a toilet ''

    Many would agree to the latter portion of the description and won't even
    eat nor be around someone who is eating one. Others, eat it no matter
    what. I tend to use it has a secret weapon... more potent than
    garlic/onion breath.

  82. Dual Durons? by LoneCoder · · Score: 1

    I know this is a better chip and all, but my point is this: most of the people I know don't know what the heck to do with all the CPU power of a Celeron 466, let alone one of these. I've seen people buying PIIIs 600, and for what? Actually, running MS Office (argh), and some only to "type the occasional resumé". I mean, I own a Toshiba Portégé 300CT, Pentium MMX 133Mhz, 64Mb RAM, and yes, I admit it, I can actually WORK IN IT doing some heavy compile-test-save-compile... (you get the picture) cycles. Now isn't THAT amazing?

    --
    "Some people see things as they are, and ask why. I dream things that never were, and ask why not."
    1. Re:Dual Durons? by floRizla · · Score: 1

      Why to use this for?

      Simple: tons of pixmaps themes, speach recognition, video editing, on-the-fly mp3 coding, graphical effects, _!!!GAMES!!!!_

    2. Re:Dual Durons? by Quintus · · Score: 1
      Acclimitisation rules! ;-)

      Seriously, I can agree. If configured properly, even the oldest computer can be highly functional in some roles, even as a gaming machine -- if you play strategy.

      But even here, there is a constant shift toward the high tech. It's hard to say what drives it -- novelty must certainly be an issue, bigger (neater, cooler, faster) is always easier than better -- but it should be noted that the monopoly leader of the main consumer market (at the moment) has a vested interest in upping hardware req.s -- remember that they get the MS tax on (nearly) all new machines sold? And since they supply the de facto system libraries, notably DirectX, in the Games market, well, I hardly need to finish this sentence. (Hardly can, given how convoluted it got ;-) This is, if you'll forgive me for harping on, why Linux/GNU (type) OSs in general are so good: they want to be correct, not commercial. This is why the benefits of 98SE are debateable (and its req.s higher) while Linux is better on less hardware.

      ______________

      --
      He who fights and runs away,

    3. Re:Dual Durons? by Quintus · · Score: 1

      PS. Used to run W'95 on a 486 sx 25 w/8mb RAM, 200HD, and then run CivII -- which technically required a DX/66... God bless wemu387.sys ;-) (Or at least circumstantial evidence suggests that this file acted as an emulator: name, CivII not working w/o it, etc.)

      --
      He who fights and runs away,

  83. Re:That's insane. by Explo · · Score: 1
    AMD already produces second-rate chips. The last thing we need is a "light version."

    Could you please specify the points that make current AMD chips second rate ones?
    The only major trouble I know is the less-than-perfect cache speed, but that hardly cripples the chip into second class.

    --
    Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
  84. The Bridge To Total Computer Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    All of my computer's problems are caused by its being infested with the spirits of 75-million-year-old dead space-aliens.

    Fortunately, the upcoming Elron(tm) processor will take care of those pesky dead space-aliens once and for all.

    Now if only the Elron(tm) processor didn't cost $100,000, it'd be nice...

    1. Re:The Bridge To Total Computer Freedom by sterwill · · Score: 1

      If you can't afford the Elron TM, you might price the newest Cone Systems' Beldar TM. It doesn't scale as well; I hear its performance tapers off a little near the top end.

      --

  85. it's all about developers by floRizla · · Score: 2

    Who developed the Pentium?
    A guy named Pentovski, a russian that came from Elbrus. Intel reigned the market several years.

    Who developed the Athlon?
    A guy, dunno his name, that came from the Alpha team. But of course it's the _whole team_ that matters... and didn't we hear rumors that a lot of good people were leaving Intel last year?
    Indeed I have yet to see their first decent product this year ;-)

    Elbrus rules!
    Somebody fund these people and shake the CPU market!

  86. Macs by peter · · Score: 1

    I'm planning to make my next computer a G4 tower. I'll run Linux on it, of course :) Modern Macs now have an easy-to-open case, so they obviously aren't trying to make it hard to upgrade! They have a PCI bus, so you can just throw any card in and have it work. (and work correctly, becauseISA PnP is where the praying happens, PCI PnP seems to work well. I'm sick of running a computer that is backwards compatible with an 8086, which wasn't designed with scalability in mind!
    BTW, anyone know where I can buy nice G4 system without a load of multi-media stuff? I just want a mobo, processor, and RAM, and maybe a new hard drive. It would be extremely cool if anyone could point me to a place where I could get a decent SMP G4 system for a decent price. (BTW, I'm in Canada)
    #define X(x,y) x##y

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  87. Re:Worst Name in Chip History... http://www.duron. by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    A consumer sees "Celeron" and "Spitfire" chips and they sound competitive--remember that AMD needs John Q. Public to buy the chip, not just Slashdotters who know what they're buying beyond name. But, an average joe sees "Celeron" versus "Duron," and it's fairly obvious which one sounds better. Guys want fast, not just durable, and impressions count in selling any product.

    I dunno, but when I hear "Celeron" I think of our favorite water based vegetable, then I think about that vegetable on a motherboard, and the water leaking out and shorting my board, then I just get mad, intel is trying to ruin my hardware! Damn intel! Damn you to hell!

    -- iCEBaLM

  88. Duron == Polyurethane for extra thin condoms! by divec · · Score: 4

    It's true! Durex Avanti condoms are made of it. Look here to find out about them.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    1. Re:Duron == Polyurethane for extra thin condoms! by jjn1056 · · Score: 1

      Definately the best condom out there; once I switched I never went back.

      --
      Peace, or Not?
    2. Re:Duron == Polyurethane for extra thin condoms! by SwingGeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm did any of you guys see the notice at the bottom of the Durex page?
      "DUREX, DUREX AVANTI, DURON, and The DUREX Seal of Quality are trademarks of the LI group."

      And now from www.amd.com:
      "AMD Duron[tm] Brand Name Selected for AMD's New Workhorse Processor"

      Now I'm no expert on IP law, but AMD and this LI group (are they behind the infamous lilo problem?...) can't *both* trademark the same name, can they?

      The USPTO strikes again... :P

    3. Re:Duron == Polyurethane for extra thin condoms! by divec · · Score: 1
      AMD and this LI group can't *both* trademark the same name, can they?

      Yeah, it's ok, y'c'n do it if the two companies do different things. Apple Computer and Apple Records is the canonical example in all the text books. I hope CPUs and contraceptives are considered to be different markets!
      --

      perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    4. Re:Duron == Polyurethane for extra thin condoms! by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      And of course we all know that apple computer was severely limited in what sort of musical abilities it was able to equip its computers with because of this.

      IIRC, when the macs were equiped with real sound (you had to buy a card to get anything but bleeps out of the Apple II -- just like a PC) they had to get apple record's permission.

  89. Upgrades by peter · · Score: 1

    > The problem is that I have been betrayed by so called "hardware
    > companies" and have been given crap. If intel made things backwards
    > compatable with adapter modules or something I could really make this
    > puppy scream.

    uh huh. Right. You do realize that memory bandwidth is a very important limitation, don't you? You have no choice but to upgrade the motherboard to get a faster system bus and memory controllers. You don't seriously think it's possible to make an adapter that lets you slap even 66MHz EDO RAM into an old 386 with 32pin SIMM slots, do you? Or to plug a K6-3@400MHz through an adapter into you 386 mobo, and have it do more than crawl? Even one really old component will drag the whole system down, be it RAM, vid card, disk, or (to a lesser extent) CPU. (A slow CPU can still throw the bytes around reasonably well, but waiting for a slow hard drive is _slow_)

    At least you have the good sense to run Debian :)
    #define X(x,y) x##y

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  90. You're weird (IMHO!) by peter · · Score: 1

    I've got a P200MMX, which I got ~2.5 years ago. It still runs great, especially after getting a new HD which gives me 14MB/s sequential read with UDMA :) Including some NICs, that's 300$ Canadian that I've spent on the machine in 2.5 years. I'm not using relatively old hardware on purpose because it is old, I'm just using it until I feel it is worth my money to upgrade. I can understand you being happy with your machine, but I don't understand the fact that you seem to think upgrading would be bad, even if it were free! (Hint for low memory/slow X window system usage: try wm2 (apt-get install wm2) ~50kB of data+text, rest of RSS is shared library code. I don't use it, since I don't need to be quite that minimal, but it comes in handy :).
    #define X(x,y) x##y

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  91. So is Socket A new? by Stormie · · Score: 1

    Damn, I get confused by all these different connections for CPUs. I'm still using a K6-2/300 so I've probably missed about 5 different slots and sockets already. :-)

    But what's the story with Socket A? Is that an existing thing or a new, not yet available, thing? I'm guessing new, since I couldn't find any reference to it anywhere on any of the tech sites I searched..

  92. Re:Dual chip = 80's band? No = 60's song by Surak · · Score: 3

    They made a song about this chip in the 60s...

    Da Duron-ron-ron Da Duron-ron... :)

  93. Spitfires are not just little old ladies.. by BandSaw · · Score: 1
    Go Here:

    http://www.spitfire-museum.com/pictures/

    And here

    http://www.netcentral.co.uk/steveb/spitfire/servic e.htm

    --

    Your wallet stays open. Our source remains closed. We are MSFT

  94. Re:Worst Name in Chip History... http://www.duron. by leiz · · Score: 2

    Spitfire is the name of a british WWII era airplane.

    I too dislike the name Duron, it rhymes with moron. and celeron... "sell and run" it sounds so cheap...


    Zetetic
    Seeking; proceeding by inquiry.

    Elench
    A specious but fallacious argument; a sophism.

  95. Duron Duron by rosewood · · Score: 1

    I sware I have heard of these dudes before -- were they not big in the 80s? www.duran-duran.net ?

  96. Re:Worst Name in Chip History... http://www.duron. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
    What was wrong with the code-name "Spitfire," anyway? The only other thing called a "spitfire" is an old type of fast sportster.

    Actually, the word association I bring up with "Spitfire" is "WWII fighter plane." I suppose the effect is about the same, though. :-)

    In any case, "Spitfire" would've been a kick-ass name...much better than "Duron." Then again, I still call Athlons K7s and Pentiums P5s.

    (I guess this means we won't see a "K9" from AMD anytime in the future...too bad, as they could have sold it as "a hacker's best friend." :-) )

    It's a cool name, and counters "Celeron" quite nicely. A consumer sees "Celeron" and "Spitfire" chips and they sound competitive--remember that AMD needs John Q. Public to buy the chip, not just Slashdotters who know what they're buying beyond name.

    Given how close "Celeron" sounds to a particular stringy green vegetable, it's a wonder it has sold in the numbers it has sold.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  97. How about Megathon? =P *nt* by Keeper · · Score: 1

    *nt*

  98. www.duron.com Oops! They forgot to get the name by Seeq · · Score: 1

    Duron: okay, so they had to use a goofy name that they could easily get the domain for.
    www.duron.com is a house paint manufacturer. D'oh! Why did they pick a name they couldn't even get the domain for?
    Has intel already grabbed all the goofy made-up words?

  99. duron huh? by kawlyn · · Score: 1
    is it just me or do the AMD naming conventions sound vaguely Klingon.

    Duron son of Athlon.

    --

    When someone yells "Stop" or goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over.
  100. From a Russian point of view (a better one) by / · · Score: 2

    How about "Duren", meaning bad, evil, nasty, ugly, etc. I personally like "durman" meaning drug/narcotic, but that's a little further removed.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  101. Durandal also a weapon name by sansbury · · Score: 1
    It's the name of a French-made missile designed to destroy runways. It drops from a plane, uses a parachute to point the nose towards the ground, then fires a rocket to plunge it in good and deep. Then it goes kaboom, leaving a nice big crater to clean up.

    -cwk.

  102. Halls of Duron by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2
    Hey, this made me think of The Hobbit and LotR! :) Remember the Halls of Durin? And the line of Durin?

    I wonder if the people at AMD did that intentionally, as a geek-effect. :) Hey, everyone loves LotR, right?

    -------
    CAIMLAS

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  103. SMP? by winsk · · Score: 1

    Anyone have links to verify whether these will support 2 way SMP? Any motherboards that will work with 2 of these? If so I want 2. And cheaper than a PIII! woo hoo.

  104. Pardon My Russian by Spaztek · · Score: 1

    Did anyone ever realize that Duron and Durok are relativly the same. Duron, rymes with moron Durok, Is russian for "Stupid" Actually, if we are considering the celeron 2 little 2 late then why is amd going to the low end market. I dont even like the celeron, and with AMD having a celeron competitor, its just not going to go over. I honestly believe that this was AMD's mistake, and that they are going to have a tough time with marketing...

    --
    "If a man watches 3 football games in a row he should be declared leagaly dead" - A
  105. Re:Worst Name in Chip History... http://www.duron. by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1
    You know, almost everyone thought the name "Athlon" sucked, and look where that got AMD :). I think AMD's plan is to hype the speed & performance of the chip, rather than the name (also, let's face it...the names of most of Intel's current/future offerings sound kind of sucky as well).

  106. I read through, didn't see it, So I'll do it. by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

    Reading down the posts, I looked for it. I didn't see it,. so I'll just go ahead and say it...

    If I get these new AMD chips,..
    and run it on a dual CPU board,..
    Would it be called "Duron Duron"?

    Just asking ?

    MP

    --
    My studio - www.graylands.ca
  107. Technical Glitch by Anonymous+Elf · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, ever since installing JunkBuster, I've been unable to see a lot of banner ads. Must be a bug in the software.

  108. Re:Offtopic, Crusade by kooma · · Score: 1
    For an English speaker this Latin-derived name may associate with "durable", but for the Russian speakers it will probably associate with "durak", that means fool in Russian.

    Totally offtopic, but this popped the Galen character from Crusade into my mind:

    Galen (in swedish) = nuts, idiot, crazy person

    Once you know that, you just can't take that character seriously anymore...

  109. Socket A Slot A... by juhaz · · Score: 1

    I just hope there will be Slot A -> Socket A adapters for these things too, like there is for Slot 1 -> PPGA/FCPGA so this won't go to this crazy "upgrade your motherboard every two weeks" thing...

  110. Irish, too. by divec · · Score: 2
    for the Russian speakers it will probably associate with "durak", that means fool in Russian

    Interesting - dúr means "stupid" in Irish as well.


    In Welsh, "duron" is the last five letters of the word for "dictionary". But that's a bit more tenuous I suppose.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  111. 386th post by qqaz · · Score: 1

    Definitely not off topic. 386 is a very important number, especially as it relates to this article.

    --
    sup :cool:
  112. Re:Actually...Duros(sp) oh well. by Fesh · · Score: 1

    LOL!!! Oh my god, excellent Douglas Adams tie-in! For those of you who didn't get this, I am truly sorry. *grin*
    --Fesh

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  113. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by Krilomir · · Score: 1

    Wow, that was a really great post!!! I think you should write a feature for Slashdot sometime =)

  114. Trademark Issues? by au3 · · Score: 1

    Down here in the South, there's a big paint manufactor named Duron. I'm fairly certain they have trademarks on Duron stuff.
    Does anybody know anything about this? Makes me wonder if we'll be seeing AMD sued, or quick backpedaling by their legal advisors.


    -AU

  115. Re:Everything you could ever want to know about Du by Amancior · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting this, I've been confused on the cache implementation for Duron, and Thunderbird for a while thinking the standard was going to be 256k L2 for Duron, and 512k L2 for T-bird. But I had no idea of the cache being unique from each other. At least this way L2 isnt L1's bitch so to speak. Now I hope they dont go blocking out SMP for Durons...........hopefully.

  116. AMD is being lukewarm by sammy_55 · · Score: 1

    AMD MUST update it's website and make it more attractive and start a vigorious [not boring] advertising campaign on TV and magazines that will cripple Intel. Also please rename the K62+/K63+ to something more cutting edge. That's just boring. Duron is boring also. You should have kept with Spitfire because people don't find find the same appeal in proccessors as in batteries.

    AMD is NOT taking advantage of it's situation. If you have an awesome technology like the Athalon, I say go all out and stop half-hearted marketing. Bad AMD bad! It's also time to meet demand by building a few more chip factories.

    Take advantage now or be eliminated later...