Slashdot Mirror


User: Bryansix

Bryansix's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,445
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,445

  1. Re:What a dumb crime. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Because the bill came up because even with the current law the problem was still happening. The Bill was meant to put a nail in the coffin and make sure there were no loopholes. Obama saw this as an attack on abortion. It was not but even his stance for allowing abortion disgusts me. Still it was his stance against this bill that insured that I would never vote for that man.

    He later came out and said in response to what he would do if one of his daughter got pregnant while still a teenager "...but if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.". Look it up, he actually said that.

  2. Re:What a dumb crime. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1
    I did read the whole article. I said that I understood the law already protected fetuses.

    The link says that the ad (which was NOT run by the McCain campaign) was incorrect about the state of the law.

    This is where I admitted that the ad was wrong. However the ad is a strawman because it has nothing to do with my point which is that he voted AGAINST the legislation

    Later on even though he was able to persuade enough votes to block the legislation multiple time the same exact measure passed on a federal level. Read the article I linked and it will all come to light. The candidate you support is a sham.

  3. Re:What a dumb crime. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Um, did you actually READ the link you just sent me? It just said that the Obama campaign lied. Yes THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN LIED! Isn't that the important part? They misrepresented the McCain platform and the platform of the Republican Party in a deceitful ad which I am surprised did not garner more attention.

    Back to what I said before, I defend my position completely. The link says that the ad (which was NOT run by the McCain campaign) was incorrect about the state of the law. What is factual however is that babies actually DID die in dirty linen closets. What else is factual is that Barack Obama IS THE ONLY vocal critic of the bill which intended to put a final stop to that practice. He is so Pro-Death that he could not see the forest for the trees and saw the bill as an assault on abortion itself which it was not.

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24354

  4. Re:How strange! on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1
  5. Re:What a dumb crime. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: -1, Troll

    That is the most retarded post I have ever read, period. You don't think for an instant that Obama would have a literal shit fit if his email ever got hacked? You know he would. Any and all candidates would. The fact is Palin doesn't mention this very often or at all. She is NOT pushing it into the media spotlight. This guy who fraudulently gained access to her email deserves to go to trial because what he did is morally and ethically wrong. Moreover he was dumb about it. If he had hacked in and found nothing (which is what he found, nothing) then just left it at that then Sarah would have had to reset the password again but probably would not think anything of it. Instead the moron posted to Wikileaks information that really was not very interesting I have to admit. In fact it would be subject to deletion for not being important had it not come from a hacked email account.

    Lastly your shoutout for Obama at the end of your post makes you appear to be in with all the rest of the mindless masses who support that man but have absolutely no idea why. They can attack the other side to provide reason not to vote for them but they can't provide a reason to vote FOR Obama. What has he done? Has he been responsible with his time? Has he voted the way you wanted on major issues? The War doesn't differentiate them. McCain wants to stay in Iraq but Obama wants to send them all over to Afghanistan. The net result is the same deployment. Obama wants a socialistic Government and McCain is more hands off with some regulation. Most importantly Obama voted to allow newborn babies who survived abortion attempts to be denied medical care, food or milk and allowed to die in a closet. Yes, look it up. He did it. Know your candidate.

  6. Re:What a dumb crime. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Not exactly. Your Insurance company implores you to not admit guilt because sometimes it turns out to be both parties fault. Then the Insurance companies can battle it out. If you admit guilt you might just void your insurance and you are on the hook for the whole enchilada.

  7. Re:?? Voting for Obama why? on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    You're voting for Obama because he "seems" like an important person? What? Gravitas or something? His ability to give a good speech? Last time I checked, you have to do something to be important. But I guess that is where we are at now - you don't have to do anything- you just have to seem like you could to people like you . .

    Quoted for Truth. Note, I don't post this anonymously. I'll defend the position.

  8. Re:Maybe the media is what he wants. on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Which is what she did.

  9. Re:Where has reading comprehesion gone :/ on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Actually you are incorrect. The password was changed TWICE. The person did NOT guess her password. He guessed her SECURITY QUESTIONS. Once you do that you have to set a new password. This is what he did. Then he posted that password and THEN the whistleblower changed the password AGAIN to prevent further access.

  10. Re:How strange! on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    When you represent yourself to a company as someone else in order to gain unauthorized access to a computer system it is most definitely fraud.

  11. Re:Is that fine a bit large? on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 1

    Did she commit computer fraud and represent herself as someone else? Uhm, No. Should all cases of email account hacking result in a grand jury and trial? I sure wish that would happen.

  12. Re:How strange! on Palin E-mail Hacker Indicted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well you don't understand wiretapping then. This is not it. Wiretapping means listening in on a conversation without intruding. This moron changed the password on the account and compromised it. This cause actual damages since she can't use the email address anymore since it has been compromised. At the very least it would have become a spam nightmare. This fraud is why he should stand trial and go to jail.

  13. Re:I call bullshit. on Malaysian Blogger On Trial For Sedition · · Score: 1

    In London the Police don't carry guns. Yes there was one incident where a man was shot because he was running through a tube station and the few plain clothes officers who did have guns (because of the terrorist attack a few weeks earlier) shot him.

    I won't make excuses for Boston or Chicago. Those cities are like cesspools.

  14. Re:Hmm.. Sedition on Malaysian Blogger On Trial For Sedition · · Score: 1

    Lame. You would know because of the anonymity of the Internet. If I had that happen to me I would simply go to a kiosk at a local university and create a onetime use email address and from there create a new blog with one post that described what had just happened to me.

  15. Re:trial shmial on Malaysian Blogger On Trial For Sedition · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's lucky he survived having two 500 pound bombs dropped on the house he was in. He WAS involved with the militants who attacked and killed two Afghan fighters and then opened fire on the US troops outside.

    Also I don't think you understand what extradition means. You ask for extradition when you want to try someone in your own country. Canada doesn't want to put him on trial. They want to repatriate him whatever that means.

  16. Re:Why on Now Google's CAPTCHA Is Broken · · Score: 1

    Okay Helen Keller. If you are Deaf AND Blind you have bigger problems. I support making the web accessible but I'll only jump through so many hoops. You can't please everyone.

  17. Re:Why on Now Google's CAPTCHA Is Broken · · Score: 1

    Being a Blackhat is fine in my book. I already said that a few posts ago. My problem with this company in question is that they are fine marketing this stuff to spammers. Also, I'd really think you would be doing a better service if you promote better audio captcha as opposed to trying to crack every captcha out there.

  18. Re:This is fucking cool on Google, Circa 2001 · · Score: 1

    Taking your own life an taking someone else's life are NOT the same thing. Abortion is Murder. We have laws against Murder for a reason.

  19. Re:The problem isn't plugging them in on Plug-in Hybrids May Not Go Mainstream, Toyota Says · · Score: 1

    The ultra-tiny Smart ForTwo earned top marks in side and front crash tests, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said Wednesday. The two-seat car did not earn the Institute's Top Safety Pick designation, however, because it didn't earn top marks for whiplash protection. But even if the ForTwo improved its whiplash protection, it would not be named a Top Safety Pick, said IIHS spokesman Russ Rader. The institute does not have a specific size requirement, but the ForTwo is simply too small to be considered safe under all conditions, including highway driving, he said

    http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/14/autos/smart_fortwo_iihs_crash_test/?postversion=2008051410

    It's Science. It can't stand up to another vehicle larger then it hitting it. http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/another-smart-crash-test-same-result/ This article mentions how the door can come open in a side impact.

  20. Re:The problem isn't plugging them in on Plug-in Hybrids May Not Go Mainstream, Toyota Says · · Score: 1

    The ultra-tiny Smart ForTwo earned top marks in side and front crash tests, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said Wednesday. The two-seat car did not earn the Institute's Top Safety Pick designation, however, because it didn't earn top marks for whiplash protection. But even if the ForTwo improved its whiplash protection, it would not be named a Top Safety Pick, said IIHS spokesman Russ Rader. The institute does not have a specific size requirement, but the ForTwo is simply too small to be considered safe under all conditions, including highway driving, he said

    http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/14/autos/smart_fortwo_iihs_crash_test/?postversion=2008051410

    It's Science. It can't stand up to another vehicle larger then it hitting it. http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/another-smart-crash-test-same-result/ This article mentions how the door can come open in a side impact.

  21. Re:Should lead to possibly great advertisements on How Kernel Hackers Boosted the Speed of Desktop Linux · · Score: 1

    I know it is illogical but Vista Pre-loads programs into RAM to make them appear to start faster when you need them.

  22. Re:The problem isn't plugging them in on Plug-in Hybrids May Not Go Mainstream, Toyota Says · · Score: 1

    The Smart is a piece of shit because you can't actually put anything in it. The other problem is morons like to commute in their SUV's and there are many commercial trucks on the road and both literally destroy that little toy of a car. It all has to do with momentum.

    The US market had chosen and it mostly likes cars about the size of the Mazda 3 or larger. It won't bear to buy anything else in mass quantities even if it sells well in Europe.

  23. Re:Electric Gas Cans? on Plug-in Hybrids May Not Go Mainstream, Toyota Says · · Score: 1

    You get a tow.

  24. Re:My Captcha on Now Google's CAPTCHA Is Broken · · Score: 1

    I dare you to find one misplaced hair on her. Do you know many hairless dogs?

  25. Re:Sweet! on Looming Royalty Decision Threatens iTunes Store, Apple Hints · · Score: 1

    The Music "Industry" as it is just needs to die. Unfortunately they won't go without kicking and screaming first. Then it can be replaced with what Bands really need which are promoters. But these promoters should be paid for services performed. They should not OWN the music of the artists they represent.