Slashdot Mirror


User: bcmm

bcmm's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,879
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,879

  1. Re:Emacs? WTF? on Real-Time, Detailed Face Tracking On a Nokia N900 · · Score: 1

    No way! I'm not getting a phone to run emacs. OTOH, give me a phone that runs vi and I'll buy it.

    Ah, but Nokia recognises the One True Text Editor, and the N900 runs vi out of the box. (It's the minimal BusyBox implementation, but vim is available as an optional package too.)

  2. Re:Summary on Throwing Out Software That Works · · Score: 1

    Nah, it seems to be more along the lines of "it sucks that I can't do stuff because I am in some way forced to use an iPad".

  3. Re:iPad? Seriously? on Throwing Out Software That Works · · Score: 1

    I don't care if Apple's adverts do it; you still look stupid using "iPad" without an article, as if it were the name of a person.

  4. Re:does it have a point in this medium? on "Choose Your Own Adventure" On Your iPhone · · Score: 4, Funny

    The thing that made choose-your-own-adventure books interesting was essentially hacking a limited notion of interactivity into a non-interactive medium

    And the iPhone is all about hacking a limited notion of interactivity into a fundamentally completely interactive medium...

  5. Re:It's Black Mold on 'Wi-Fi Illness' Spreads To Ontario Public Schools · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Sounds like x, I read that it matches the symptoms perfectly" is exactly what produced this crap in the first place.

    No it isn't. The difference is in whether x is a real thing or not.

  6. Re:Ok but... on Valve Trademarks 'DOTA' · · Score: 1

    So it's only mostly dead?

    Clearly, the franchise is bricked.

  7. Re:Hurray! Let's get this Clown out of Business on Obama Wants Allies To Go After WikiLeaks · · Score: 1

    PROTIP: Paragraphs and appropriate capitalisation can help you look less like Gene Ray.

  8. Re:Why do I need KDE? on KDE 4.5 Released · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can someone explain to me why I need a huge resource hungry window manager, sorry - desktop enviroment - like KDE running as my machine?

    First of all, if you really aren't trolling, you should know the difference between a window manager and a DE. It's about as irritating as saying "Ubuntu is a terrible window manager, sorry - distribution".

    As to why you need a DE? You don't. Some people like using them, others don't. A few examples of things I use KDE for:

    • most importantly, a well-integrated suite of applications with a consistent look at feel (and not just in terms of appearance: for example, the dialogue for configuring keyboard shortcuts is always in the same place in the menu structure in a KDE application). This includes an office suite, web browser, basic utilities and so on. Example of integration: dragging a link from a web page to a directory (both open in konqueror) saves the file there rather than creating a shortcut or something.
    • if you don't care about disk space and do a full KDE SC install, you have a matching set of utilities such as a calculator, basic text editor, magnifier, volume control, clipboard manager (very useful), etc.
    • you get some integration between the WM and the rest of the system: applications will not have keyboard shortcuts that conflict with your WM, for example.
    • various user daemons: reminders of calendar events, graphical display of messages sent with wall(1), etc.
    • an easy way to mount and unmount removable media

    KDE also has some very nice features for application developers, such as the kparts system, which further improves consistency. For example, kate (an advanced text editor), kwrite (a notepad-style editor), Kile (a LaTeX IDE) and kdevelop (a software development IDE) all use katepart for text editing, which gives their text editing widgets the same appearance, keyboard shortcuts, indenting options and so on.

    I've only scratched the surface here, but it's still perfectly reasonable to use a simple WM with some kind of launcher instead, or to switch between them.

  9. Re:W00t on KDE 4.5 Released · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a rather flawed argument: it's in the "Computer Administration" section, which is obviously not for playing with randomly as one might with "Look & Feel". If you go there without knowing what you're doing and break things, you were going to break your computer anyway.

    In general, I would rather that developers keep obscure options available, (with sane defaults, and under an "Advanced" tab or similar) than remove them in case idiots play with them. If you don't agree with me, you're welcome to use Gnome, which has a tendency towards removing potentially confusing things, or indeed to buy a Mac, but it's not really fair to criticise KDE for allowing power users to mess with stuff if that's what they want to do, since an awful lot of KDE users like the configurability, and the rest just avoid clicking "Advanced >>".

    Also, the Phonon KCM provides useful features other than backend selection, such as specifying priority of audio devices ("use my USB headset if it's plugged in, otherwise use my sound card").

  10. Re:W00t on KDE 4.5 Released · · Score: 1

    I gave the example of MS Windows especially so that people would realise that different types of computer require audio to be output using different systems. I can't tell whether you're implying that KDE developers getting to use a unified audio API across different operating systems complicates the user experience in some way, or that you are somebody who pointedly doesn't care how things work internally, in which case I'm not sure why you bothered replying.

  11. Re:W00t on KDE 4.5 Released · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously though, phonon has pluggable backends, and this does not mean the PulseAudio is going to be compulsory for KDE users, any more than its DirectShow integration makes MS Windows compulsory for KDE users.

  12. W00t on KDE 4.5 Released · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now we can have a thread with KDE haters AND PA haters in it!

  13. Re:Angle for /.ers: on Ted Stevens and Sean O'Keefe In Plane Crash · · Score: 1

    The DHC-3T isn't a flying boat. A flying boat uses a combined hull/fuselage. It's a seaplane (or floatplane, in the US).

  14. Re:I helped jack off the horse on Ted Stevens and Sean O'Keefe In Plane Crash · · Score: 1

    It's an article title, which are always capitalised apart from words like "and".

  15. Re:Weeds? on Genetically Modified Canola Spreads To Wild Plants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All good points, and I'm not really disputing any. But there is the fact that much of the world is starving, and GM crops could offer them some hope.

    This is important: there is no global shortage of food. People are hungry due to political and especially economic reasons.

  16. Re:Privacy on Saudi Says RIM Deal Reached; BlackBerry OK, If We Can Read the Messages · · Score: 1

    Uh... Where do you think the existing servers are?

  17. 8 months? on Child Porn As a Weapon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's lucky he wasn't murdered while the cops were messing about.

    As for "how easily might this trick have succeeded if Weiner had been a little more intelligent about it?", I'd bet it has succeeded in the past, repeatedly.

  18. Offtopic on ReCAPTCHA.net Now Vulnerable to Algorithmic Attack · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Obvious technical errors in summaries bother me more than spelling/grammar errors.

    A Firefox extension is not the same thing as a plugin.

  19. Why the big fuss? on Churchill Accused of Sealing UFO Files, Fearing Public Panic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    WWII produced quite a lot of UFO stories, and the event in the article sound pretty much like a foo fighter, which are a pretty well-documented, if unexplained, phenomenon. In other words, there are dozens of similar stories which nobody has made any effort to cover up.

    Also, the article annoys me greatly be implicitly equating UFOs with extraterrestrial spacecraft throughout:

    Another person at the meeting raised the possibility of a UFO

    Really? During a meeting discussing an unidentified flying object?

    The comment about the Church implies that the object was assumed to be extraterrestrial, which is perhaps the least plausible bit: why would a group of military experts assume such a thing?

  20. Re:Sounds Like Maggot Treatment on Dog Eats Man's Toe and Saves His Life · · Score: 1

    Pedant says: It's either sterile or it's not.

    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/quite#Adverb

    Has usage 1. gone out of use in North America or something? It's quite normal here, if slightly old-fashioned.

  21. Re:And why is this in idle? on Artist Photoshops Scenes From WWII Into Present Day · · Score: 1

    Because, while it's awesome, it's not really on-topic. Idle is, presumably, supposed to be a general section that covers the sorts of things blogs without a definite direction cover, rather than the mostly tech/open source stuff Slashdot traditionally covers.

    I'll agree that this is the best thing by a very long way that I've seen in Idle so far.

  22. Re:Very interesting on Artist Photoshops Scenes From WWII Into Present Day · · Score: 1

    Judging art by technical proficiency? You sound like one of those snobs who entirely dismisses almost all music for using boring time signatures or something.

  23. Re:Locations on Artist Photoshops Scenes From WWII Into Present Day · · Score: 1

    The first two are the Reichstag too.

  24. Locations on Artist Photoshops Scenes From WWII Into Present Day · · Score: 1

    I recognise a few of the places in the photos, and would really like to know where the others are. If there isn't a page identifying them somewhere, shall we make a list here?

    I'll start: sergeylarenkov12.jpg shows Soviet soldiers in front of the Reichstag building, Berlin.

  25. Re:Unimpressive all things considered on Budapest Panorama, at 70GP, Now the World's Largest Digital Photo · · Score: 1

    This becomes considerably less impressive when you realize that this image is done with sponsorship from major partners, whereas images like the Dubai picture, or the 50 Gigapixel image in Vienna were both done by individuals.

    Was one of those sponsors Microsoft, by any chance?