A 5.25-inch disk has a radius of 2.625 inches. The area of the disk is thus 21.65 square inches (remember A=pi × r^2). Even using both sides, that's just 42.3 square inches.
But the fact that Microsoft isn't a scavenger like SCO should make Microsoft more cautious as well. SCO had little to lose in suing IBM. Also, if such a suit is riskier, it also has greater rewards.
As far as AIX goes, on how many architectures can it run?
So any programmers who mess up get tossed out of a dirigible?
Or his is real job to flood Cupertino? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090264/
Of course, he might be too evil, even for Microsost.
How much more consistent can uninstalling get from rpm -Uvh foo-1.0.0-i586.rpm (to install package foo)? How is rpm -e foo not an uninstallation script?
But in the absence of H1B workers, what would the prevailing wage be? If companies can't hire enough workers at the prevailing wage, then the prevailing wage is below the market wage. H1B's may not affect the prevailing wage, but they may still affect the market wage.
But is even that a good idea? Do you want any user to be able to drop all of your tables? I might do that on my intra-apartmental network, but over the whole web?
But Roark didn't require that the entire rest of the world share his view. He required that some other people share his view (to some extent), but not everybody.
Your case for software is even weaker, as programming is cheaper than building. Who was Stallman's client when he wrote gcc?
Slashdot Mirror
I just never had such problems with optical media. I did have some problems with my SUSE 10.0 DVD, but a little cleaning got it back.
A 5.25-inch disk has a radius of 2.625 inches. The area of the disk is thus 21.65 square inches (remember A=pi × r^2). Even using both sides, that's just 42.3 square inches.
Dont the BSD's use gcc as a C compiler?
At 4GB a movie, you would need 5-6 such hard drives to replace a 400-DVD jukebox.
But the fact that Microsoft isn't a scavenger like SCO should make Microsoft more cautious as well. SCO had little to lose in suing IBM. Also, if such a suit is riskier, it also has greater rewards.
As far as AIX goes, on how many architectures can it run?
Why wouldn't it be in IBM's interest to have a patent war against Microsoft? Doesn't IBM have more patents than Microsoft?
Or, hire Christopher Walken as a Project manager
So any programmers who mess up get tossed out of a dirigible? Or his is real job to flood Cupertino? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090264/ Of course, he might be too evil, even for Microsost.
Of course, sometimes you want more boots on the ground. Perhaps the "excess" will be put in the army?
DOS evolved from System III? How? DOS lacked multitasking, DOS 1.0 didn't even have nested directories. And Gates did not rip off DOS, he bought it.
The "uninstalling" in the first question should be "installing".
Better plots than PSTricks? Yeah, right.
Am I missing the joke? "Brillant" isn't even a word.
How much more consistent can uninstalling get from rpm -Uvh foo-1.0.0-i586.rpm (to install package foo)? How is rpm -e foo not an uninstallation script?
How does using Windows help get high-quality figures in LaTeX?
According to Learning SQL, "SQL" doesn't stand for anything.
That's a trick question, as "SQL" doesn't stand for anything.
Isn't that "high horse"?
But in the absence of H1B workers, what would the prevailing wage be? If companies can't hire enough workers at the prevailing wage, then the prevailing wage is below the market wage. H1B's may not affect the prevailing wage, but they may still affect the market wage.
Then admit that you aren't in favor of a free market in labor.
Has anyone ever (successfully) sued Microsoft for downtime?
And how long will that last (more desktops than laptops)? Aren't laptops currently outselling desktops?
But is even that a good idea? Do you want any user to be able to drop all of your tables? I might do that on my intra-apartmental network, but over the whole web?
But Roark didn't require that the entire rest of the world share his view. He required that some other people share his view (to some extent), but not everybody.
Your case for software is even weaker, as programming is cheaper than building. Who was Stallman's client when he wrote gcc?
But as Roark asked, should one build in order to have clients, or have clients in order to build? Which is the means and which is the end (if either)?
Wasn't it IBM, by lending its name and open design (except for the BIOS, which was reversed engineered by Phoenix(?)), that made the PC a commodity?