Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Construct iPod/DS/PSP Killer

Karsten writes "According to The Mercury News Microsoft is developing a PSP/DS/GBA/iPod-killer. J. Allard is leading the project." J. Allard is the man behind the Xbox, and from looking at the article it sounds like it's at least a year before this device, if it hits daylight, would be coming.

318 comments

  1. killers by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dammit, can't they make a Windows killer?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:killers by ceeam · · Score: 1

      No, they can't. They make products. You want a tool.

    2. Re:killers by fatduck · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are; it's called Vista.

      --
      Making you think you're crazy is a billion dollar industry.
    3. Re:killers by mlk · · Score: 3, Funny

      A brick kills most windows

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:killers by terbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dammit, can't they make a Windows killer?

      Why can't they just make something that goes around hugging everything ..

      like trees ..

      --
      If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
    5. Re:killers by minginqunt · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's done it before, and he'll do it again.

      Steve Ballmer's going to fucking kill Goog^H^H^H^HiPod^H^H^H^HPSP^H^H^HDS^H^HTHE WHOLE WORLD!!!

    6. Re:killers by /ASCII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, Microsoft doesn't make products, they make 'solutions'. Just look at Origami. The pre-announcement hype was about a PSP-killer/iPod-killer/whatever-killer and in the end, it turns out to be a slightly smaller formfactor for tablet PCs, obviously inspired by the Nokia 770. There isn't even a product; the only thing Microsoft will release WRT Origami is yet another stripped version of Windows, to fill the imagined gap between CE and Media center.

      --
      Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
    7. Re:killers by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why can't they just make something that goes around hugging everything ..

      They did. His name was Clippy.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    8. Re:killers by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "Dammit, can't they make a Windows killer?"

      Windows Vista seems a good candidate for that.

    9. Re:killers by krewemaynard · · Score: 0, Troll

      "You want a tool."

      Like Ballmer? ba dum dum

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    10. Re:killers by ceeam · · Score: 1

      I said "tool", not "stool".

    11. Re:killers by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And Windows gives birth to most bricks. Think about it.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    12. Re:killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be
      Steve Ballmer's going to fucking kill Goog^H^H^H^HiPod^H^H^H^HPSP^H^H^HDS^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ H^H^H^H THE WHOLE WORLD!!!

      ???

    13. Re:killers by AirRaven · · Score: 0

      I'd say that it manages quite adequetly on its own.

    14. Re:killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:killers by shotfeel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dammit, can't they make a Windows killer?

      No need to. On some of my systems, Windows is quite adept at dying all on its own.

    16. Re:killers by zlogic · · Score: 1

      No, that was Microsoft Bob!
      Se what the bastard has done with Windows 3.11, the only place I see it is in my university's ancient lab.

    17. Re:killers by Minced · · Score: 1

      "Dammit, can't they make a Windows killer?" They already did, its called "Windows ME"

    18. Re:killers by tsa · · Score: 1

      That's what I hate about Windows. The hugging. Uch, I hate being hugged.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    19. Re:killers by franksands · · Score: 1

      Or at least an Web2.0 killer? I can't stand any more these web 2.0 stories.

    20. Re:killers by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      He does not need Windows killers, only harder chairs and walls.

      --
      No sig for now.
    21. Re:killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, Microsoft doesn't make products, they make 'solutions'."

      Yeah, two kinds. They make solutions to problems where choosing other solutions, oftentimes better ones, will perceivably come at great risk (such as when one considers deploying alternative operating systems), and they also make solutions to problems that don't exist (resulting in any of their long line of duds).

      Why do the former solutions succeed and the latter solutions fail? Legacy compatibility and lack thereof, respectively. That's because MS is only good at one thing: expanding your perceived need for more of the same thing over and over, with minimal upgrades and at additional cost equal to or greater than what people have already paid for previous solutions (which may actually still work just fine, btw, with the exception that MS doesn't actively offer security updates for those solutions any more).

      "The pre-announcement hype was about a PSP-killer/iPod-killer/whatever-killer and in the end, it turns out to be a slightly smaller formfactor for tablet PCs, obviously inspired by the Nokia 770. There isn't even a product; the only thing Microsoft will release WRT Origami is yet another stripped version of Windows, to fill the imagined gap between CE and Media center."

      This places Origami squarely in the dud category before it even launches. It's basically their groundwork for their line of PDAs 2-3 product generations from now, not something that anybody is actually going to buy. Maybe even open beta for technologies destined for the "Xboy." Simple, pointless evolution of existing concepts that they are trying to figure out what to do with for their next "solution" (hopefully for them not as pointless next time). That's MS-style R&D - not too different from the concept car scene, only they expect people actually to buy their interim beta solutions, knowing that they will not be supporting for any meaningful length of time.

      As for "Xboy?" Let's see what problem this solution attempts to rectify.

    22. Re:killers by Guignol · · Score: 1

      you mispelled stuhl...

  2. killer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hold your breath while waiting, and it will be a people killer too!

    1. Re:killer... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In a bid to capture the huge audience for handheld entertainment gadgets, Microsoft is designing a product that combines video games, music and video in one handheld device, according to sources familiar with the project.

      I'm confused. I thought that's what Origami--er, sorry, "Ultra Mobile Personal Computers"-- were supposed to be? So Microsoft is now going to invalidate UMPCs with another handheld gadget. That is, if it ever sees the light of day. Microsoft has been promising digital media competition every year now.

      This is just showing how unfocused Microsoft is, to release a handheld computer, then work on another handheld computer for a different target market.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:killer... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      This is just showing how unfocused Microsoft is, to release a handheld computer, then work on another handheld computer for a different target market.

      Of course this is the company that's bringing us about half a dozen different versions of Vista...

      MS has a way of so narrowly defining targets that they actually cease to exist.

  3. Everything is a 'Killer' by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Microsoft To Construct iPod/DS/PSP Killer
    Please! This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue over who killed who ...

    I've said it before and I'll say it again--for the love of god, please stop printing mindless headlines of the form "[insert company name here] is [planning/making] a [insert industry-wide leading product name here] killer."
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Yeah tell me about it... and what is worse is when you start a project by comparing it to the iPod before there is even a glimer of information about it.

      I think this Microsoft (insert clever code name here) is only going to kill it self.

      In the end MS doesn't seem to add anything to the personal entertanment market... what they don't seem to get is that a successful game or media player needs to truely give the user what they want without making them jump through hoops.

      Microsoft could make the industry do whatever they want, but they have choosen to make corporations happy and not customers, it's sad really.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    2. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by G)-(ostly · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Slashdot makes money through ad impressions. They're not here to uphold high journalistic standards and create intelligent, competent discussion threads, they're here to make money by getting as many goobers to click on a story as they can. In fact, they never claimed the former, not even before they were purchased and started focusing on the latter.

      To that end, all that matters here is that the word "Microsoft" paired with a controversial claim is right in the headline. They're betting you'll click through and up their ad revenue.

      Guess what? They were right.

      That said, I have nothing relevant to the article to post, because the article wasn't really relevant to anything...

    3. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, I thought that the PSP was supposed to be the iPod/DS killer. So if MS kills the PSP before it gets a chance to kill the iPod and the DS, then it's just wasting energy, cause it'll have to go kill them itself. It'd be much more efficient and cheaper for MS to wait until Sony finishes killing the iPod and the DS, and then just go whack the PSP. And then wait for Google to release a small electronic device, and then go kill that too.

      I think that the "* killer" tag has pretty much become one of those laughable buzzwords; where when a PR guy says it, you know he's got no idea about what's really going on, and when someone knowledgeable uses it, it's in a sort of sarcastic mocking tone. Basically, any time I see a slashdot headline talking about a "killer", I can be confident that the comments will 95% be people stating lots of reasons why it obviously won't work that way. Let the marketing people have their cute little terms, no one besides themselves is fooled.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    4. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by Hitto · · Score: 1

      Well then, adblock users must like shallow discussion, in your eyes. But I agree with you : not only has /. been lagging in the news department, they're also keen on controversial newsworthy items.

      Back on topic, LOL. "hmm, sony's getting beaten up by Nintendo pretty hard, s'pose we could pull a me-too and lose against them as well" must be what a Microsoft exec is thinking right now?

    5. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by aiyo · · Score: 1

      The slashvertisements are really starting to become annoying. I think I'll stop reading slashdot for now, while the rest of you who stay behind can work on fixing the problems here. I might come back in 6-12 months to see if the site has it's act together. There are so many places for this kind of news that I won't even stick around for the comments.

    6. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by neilyos · · Score: 1

      why the heck isn't this modded funny? does nobody realize it's a monty python quote? how incredibly pathetic.

    7. Re:Everything is a 'Killer' by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute though, what if they go back in time and kill the ipod before it has time to be killed by the PSP and then the PSP will never have existed and then the DS will be... er... let me start again.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  4. Obligatory by gentimjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to troll but .. I'm sorry, its from Microsoft .. its surely going to have an Intel chip (Mobile EXTREEEEEEEEME Hunger Eddition) and run WindowsCE(meNT) loaded with more DRM than you thought possible from a mobile .. the only thing this is going to "kill" is batteries ...

    1. Re:Obligatory by moro_666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      well if the xbox team is behind it, it will probably overheat and scratch your cd's aswell (without using them).

      Can't wait anymore, i'm too excited :D

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Obligatory by gentimjs · · Score: 1

      You forgot that it would also be the size of a car tire ;-)

    3. Re:Obligatory by releppes · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Unfortunately, I can see Microsoft killing just about anything they set their minds to. All they have to do is throw money at it. Just look at the xbox. When I first heard about microsoft breaking into the game console buisness, I laughed and thought they wouldn't stand a chance. Well, sure enough there it is. And they were able to pour so much money into it that they even made good games. On top of all that, people actually went out and bought the product. Now the thought of owning an xbox is like a status symbol in the gaming community. Much like an iPod is a status symbol in the portable music community.


      Can Microsoft pull it off? Absolutely! It's unfortunate, but true. Even if they don't pull it off, they have such a fat wad of cash, the they can afford to flop. And their flop will most likely have a devastating effect on the market as well. I absolutely hate buying microsoft stuff, but the truth is they do make some good products. I concider Office to be their flagship. All their hardware ventures are pretty good (mice,keyboards,...). It's just that their OS and their vision of what an OS should be that really sucks (in my opinion).


      However, when microsoft tried to take over the PDA market, it's surprizing to see that they were unsuccessful. They made a big dent, but I'm surprized they didn't completely wipe out all competition. PalmOS was really the only contender. And their offering of an OS and device were pretty lacking (still is!). So, given that little history, maybe they won't be successful.

    4. Re:Obligatory by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article mentions that Transmeta will be providing the chip, not Intel.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not quite that big...

      XBox(Portable)

    6. Re:Obligatory by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their stuff is too expensive and complicated.

      I'm a little older and not really in the gaming community anymore (yet) but I don't see how the xbox is a status symbol. Maybe it is but I don't see it.
      In my day, Intellivision was a status symbol just because it was more expensive, new, and had better graphics but the controller and games sucked. At the end of the day, if you had an Intellivision, everyone opted to play Atari instead and your console collected dust.

      What Palm vs WinCE proved is that people want simple and the iPod gives them that as well.
      Personally I liked WinCE over Palm but Palm was a better mass market PDA.

      XBOX is just a 'me too' console. Sure there are some exclusive titles but most 3rd party titles are written for all consoles.
      I could be wrong on this but from what I see,
      if you want Halo, get Xbox;
      if you want Mario, get Nintendo;
      I don't know what Sony has exclusive but apparently it's still #1 maybe because of number of titles and cost?

      BTW, the first Microsoft digital speakers (manufactured by Phillips) are still the best pair of speakers I've used (and still use - albeit in analog mode via Linux)

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    7. Re:Obligatory by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Remember, Overheating is a feature. Microsoft calls it a new form of "Force Feedback."

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    8. Re:Obligatory by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Right, infact it says Transmeta has assigned 20 or so engineers to the project.

      But this is /., so the actual facts stated in the article are irrelevant to any discussion of the article.

    9. Re:Obligatory by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Right, except the article says it's gonna run a transmeta chip.

      Which begs the question: but will it run Linux?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    10. Re:Obligatory by 2443W · · Score: 1

      They're calling this new technology "fire feedback", it allows you to feel in detail what its like to be, for example on the surface of Venus.

    11. Re:Obligatory by Cerium · · Score: 1

      What doesnt these days? Considering the swarms of linux fans with lots of free time, Im sure theres a toaster somewhere acting as a web server.

    12. Re:Obligatory by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      correction. the article states that transmeta is working with microsoft on a secret project. no direct mention of a handheld console. we are supposed to infer that since they specialize in creating lowpower comsumption chips, they are working on a portable xbox? that's this guys biggest proof.

      thats the equivalent of saying that i went to lunch with my boss. since my boss is a woman and i am a man, we must obviously be having sex.

    13. Re:Obligatory by cpm80 · · Score: 1

      Your comment would make sense if it weren't for the Origami. A lot of people thought transmeta was working on that, but they weren't.

      How many projects can 30 hardware engineers be working on at a software company.

      Given this information let me rewrite your lunch with the boss example: You went to lunch with your boss and DIDN'T GET ANYTHING TO EAT. Since your boss is a woman and you're a man, you must obviously be having sex.

    14. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't he have had something to eat then?

    15. Re:Obligatory by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      this is microsoft... they can have 20 engineers working on shrinking the xbox360 power supply. who knows? my point is that this is all unfounded speculation. they could have transmeta working on almost anything. microsoft may be making their own version of the mac mini, who knows?

      furthermore, the xbox line has stayed near to consumer available chips. their philosophy has been to mimic pc gaming on the console level. why would they switch that strategy during the inception of the xbox360?

      so back to the example, i went to lunch with my boss and DIDN'T GET ANYTHING TO EAT. Since my boss is a woman and im a man, you assume that i must obviously be having sex; when in fact im only getting a blowjob. =)

    16. Re:Obligatory by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      In my eyes, Sony has two things:
      1) the Gran Turismo series. While there are some competitors on the XBox which probably even look better, the GT series just seems to always come out on top as the better racing sim. (This go around, it is heavily supported by the Logitech wheel with 720 degree movement, like in a real car.)
      2) the PS2 is always the first to get any GTA game. If I'm not mistaken, Sony has some sort of exclusivity deal that allows them exclusive licensure of any new GTA games for a period of time.

      That said, their overwhelming popularity is probably also a major reason.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    17. Re:Obligatory by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I forgot about GT, thanks.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    18. Re:Obligatory by valintin · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Final Fantasy.

    19. Re:Obligatory by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Good call on that one. I doubt it has the same market share as GTA and GT, but that is surely a whole set of gamers there, many of whom may or may not be interested in the GTA or GT franchises.

      I guess this proves that Sony doesn't have just one really good exclusive title: it has many, some of which attract different types of gamers. Maybe that has something to do with their success?

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    20. Re:Obligatory by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      That's true enough; in fact, I've seen the toaster (hunt around on http://www.mini-itx.com for it).

      I just figured I'd place the 'does the new device for which slashdot is generating hype run linux' in the comment thread it belongs, ie: 'obligatory'.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  5. Today is March 20th by 1336.5 · · Score: 1

    This article should have been released April 1st.

    kk

    thx

  6. hmm... no by joe+155 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This won't work, but we should all know that already know that. You can't just stick all the available technology into something and hope it all works out, this will end up being as big as origami with about 2 hours of battery life. I like things to be seperate, which is why I have an MP3 player, and a DS (and a camera and phone and whatever else they'll probably try and throw in it) I like things to be excellent at the one thing that they do, not just "acceptable" at everything under the sun

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:hmm... no by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      This is not a convergence device as you seem to believe, it's just a portable game system with enough onboard storage to act as an MP3 and video player. Really nothing new, except that Microsoft will have another platform to launch exclusive titles, and get a finger in the music-store pie. The size doesn't have to be any larger than Nintendo's offerings, since the storage required for a useful MP3 player amounts to a couple of chips smaller than postage stamps.

    2. Re:hmm... no by cowscows · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft, Quiet you naysayer! I don't think they're being ambitious enough! This is Microsoft we're talking about! The greatest of all great companies in the greatest of all great nations! Not only will this device accomplish all that has been listed, but following in the usual Microsoft tradition, incredible new features will likely be added between now and the eventual, ontime release of this device. Don't be surprised if this device solves our fossil fuel dependence problems. It may very well cure AIDS. And then we can give copies of the device to everyone in the middle east, so they'll stop being angry towards the USA.

      Come on, we're not talking about a tiny hardware company like Apple, or a rowdy upstart like Google. We're talking about Microsoft, a hard working bunch of people who have, through sheer innovation and stringent quality standards, created the technological paradise which most of us live in every day. Show a little respect to the company that gave us marvels such as text editors, web browsers, and beautiful graphical interfaces.

      If the Xbox has taught us anything, it's that Microsoft's hardware will be at least as slick as their software, and all of their products share an impressive efficiency in terms of resource usage. The future truly is now, and you're lucky to be alive during these exciting times.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:hmm... no by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I beg to differ.

      You CAN do that. but only if you add one more thing.

      Make it 100% open and remove DRM.

      People will flock to it like insane rabbits. If you can play ANY of your music on it, allow Wifi share-playing (music that other can listen to on your device but they cant copy) and all the other goodies without all the useless and worthless DRM and secrecy that simply limit a device as well as annoy users.

      Then it will kill everything in it's path.

      The chances of it existing? -12.4% Center of this planet must solidify first.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:hmm... no by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Um, Microsoft owns most of the PDA market now (70%) and they are making large inroads in the cellphone market too. They also are the number 2 console maker in the world (unseated Nintendo a while ago). In case you guys missed it, MS has a lot of experience in both the game and mobile markets.

    5. Re:hmm... no by Covetous+Knight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm, okay. How about the Archos.

      No DRM just like you said - and somehow people aren't flocking to it in droves. Could it be that you really would like a product without DRM, but you're a little out of touch with what the masses want?

    6. Re:hmm... no by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry about the battery life. It comes with it's own transformer, but you have to be carful not to put it on carpet because that will block the fan ports.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (music that other can listen to on your device but they cant copy)

      lol what? the only what that can happen (without DRM, you said so earlier) is if the "wifi sharing" is of the "here, wear my headphones" variety.

    8. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so how do I play video games on the archos? no not crappy cellphone quality games.

      Where can I buy NFL2006 from EA games for the archos?

      Oh you CANT?

      how about the archos SUCK in it's user interface? or it's screen sucks? or it's picky about video formats? (mplayer can play anything why cant these nimrod manufacturers figure out how to get Mplayer like compatability in a device?)

      therefore you are makeing a comparison that is apples to oranges.

      try again.

      What lumpy wants is the GP2X... it DOES all of that.

    9. Re:hmm... no by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

      I'd buy one if, in addition, it were at least a "Sunbeam killer" and could toast English muffins and bagels.
      But without that extra functionality, I don't see enough value in a device that "kills" only three industry-leading gadgets.
      Adding a SureShot-killing 8 MP camera with integrated 20x optical zoon and a Fender-killing electric guitar would also be nice. The AIDS drug killer function mentioned in the parent could be nice too.
      It slices! It dices! It juliennes! It plays MP3s! It has integrated 3G cellular technology! It plays games! And that's not all! It replaces broken or lost buttons on clothing! It toasts your bagel perfectly in HALF THE TIME! It prepares your Form 1040 in 15 minutes, GUARANTEED! It destroys HIV without inflicting damage on the host! It does away with your dependence on petroleum products! It elminates spyware! And best of all, it can be yours for the low, low price of...

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    10. Re:hmm... no by smokes2345 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're kidding right? Microsoft is a bloated dinosaur that needs to similarly disappear. They haven't had an original idea in years. The very fact that they have to call it a "killer" implies that they aren't the first on the scene. Please, save your respect and tell us that was meant with at least some sort of sarcasm.

    11. Re:hmm... no by galileo669 · · Score: 1

      "We're talking about Microsoft, a hard working bunch of people who have, through sheer innovation and stringent quality standards, created the technological paradise which most of us live in every day"

      I trust you're being sarcastic with this, cuz I couldn't keep a straight face reading it.

    12. Re:hmm... no by BlackWyng · · Score: 1

      You owe me some money! Your sarcasm dripped all over my LCD and destroyed my laptop. Please contact me to make payment arrangements.

    13. Re:hmm... no by wanorris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of music players can play music that don't have DRM -- nearly all of them. If you rip your music library to MP3, you can play it on virtually any device that plays music, and you will be DRM-free.

      Granted, most of these devices don't have wifi, but even there, you still have options right now. For example, plenty of Pocket PCs can stream music (or video) over wifi. Drop in a 4GB flash card (some are now under $150) and you've got yourself a perfectly serviceable portable music player that can play streaming as well as downloaded audio. It can also play no-DRM Divx movies, has a wide array of simple games, and can (obviously) serve as a personal organizer.

    14. Re:hmm... no by misfit815 · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with that. It seems to me that the time's ripe for some new-and-improved all-in-one devices. I personally would rather have a mobile phone / mp3 player / camera / tv remote / garage door opener / pda / whatever. The problem's not in the idea, it's in the execution. The user interfaces for these things tend to be so damn confusing and convoluted that it's just not worth the expense.

      You could control 90% of the functions of such a device with no more buttons than what's on an ipod. Make it a flip-top with an alphanumeric keypad underneath, and that's it. And there'd better be only two modes - caps lock and no caps lock.

      Of course another problem is what somebody else pointed out. If it's made by Microsoft (or Sony or insert-big-name-here) than it'll be dripping with DRM. Somebody needs to put one of these together in his garage for it to be any good.

      Sorry, this is less coherent than my normal rant (believe it or not) and prolly great flame bait, but this concept of carrying a million little widgets in your pocket is just plain dumb. I have a usb drive tucked in a jacket pocket somewhere and a cell phone that's 5 years old - that's it. And it's mainly because I don't want to spend a bajillion dollars on a bunch of different widgets that could easily all be combined into one piece of hardware (and please don't let microsoft design the ui).

      J

      --
      Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me. - John 14:6 NLT
    15. Re:hmm... no by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Uhh...yeah..I was totally being serious. No sarcasm at all. I don't think it's the least bit unreasonable to expect a software/electronics company to release a device that plays music and cures AIDS. Nothing in my original post was meant in jest, and I stand by my words until the end.

      I realize that text doesn't transmit inflection and body language and all of that, so some times it can be a little hard to see things like sarcasm. But come on, I said I wouldn't be surprised if the device replaced fossil fuels. You couldn't have possibly thought I was serious...could you?

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    16. Re:hmm... no by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah. You can also just leave it in your pocket when you wash your clothes, and it will act as a fabric softener. It's a good thing Microsoft has been stealing all those talented engineers away from Google, and finally letting them work on something new and exciting.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    17. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only two divisions of MS are profitable: office and windows. Every other division loses money. I bet any company could eventually gain substantial marketshare by buying it with literally truck-loads of money. X-Box may have recently become number two in the global market, but it alone has lost over FOUR FRIGGIN' BILLION DOLLARS! Woohoo! Go team! Is that how you define success?

      I don't know about you, but I do not give a company any credit when they have to continually take a massive loss on products in an effort to buy it market-share and mind-share. The typical end result of this strategy, if the company succeeds in dominating the market, is monopoly-rents for the consumer. Look no further than office and windows for MS-specific examples.

    18. Re:hmm... no by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Of course like you said, his assertion is a little underdefined. Such a scheme could still be possible if you wrote a proprietary streaming client/server and only released it for the device in question. It could be considered DRM in the most elementary sense, but it would not be as intrusive as most schemes. OTOH, why would you want to hear someone else's music on your own super-cool $500 player? The idea might work, but nobody would use it for streaming.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    19. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on people, he is kidding! Even the most ardent MS fanboi wouldn't be able to write that without busting in gales of laughter and I do not think Bill Gates or Steve Ballmer have a slashdot account.

    20. Re:hmm... no by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      Could it be that you really would like a product without DRM, but you're a little out of touch with what the masses want?

      Could it be that Archos doesn't advertise? I guarantee you, if you were to walk down the street and ask random people what Archos sells, you'd get blank stares from at least nine out of ten.

      Maybe if they began pushing the fact that their player isn't as restricted as the iPod and other MP3 players are, they'd start doing a bit better. As it is now, though...if no one knows, no one's going to care.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    21. Re:hmm... no by iainl · · Score: 1

      Sharing over wi-fi is a novel idea (though liable to be battery hungry), I fail to see what refusing to support DRM is going to gain you.

      iPod, iRiver, Creative and all the others will play unprotected mp3 files, some will even support Ogg if you're that rabidly in search of openness already. When you say "remove DRM" what you actually mean is "refuse to play files that already contain DRM".

      I fail to see why refusing to support file formats that many people already have music in would help matters.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    22. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of the preview button???

    23. Re:hmm... no by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Mplayer can have a Ghz machine, with GB of RAM and 100s of watts of power. Plus CPUs with floating point operations, vector processing etc.

      How do you expect something that runs off batteries, has maybe a few hundred MHz CPU without any floating point, vector processing and very limited RAM to do the same?

    24. Re:hmm... no by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      Decoding video ain't that hard, son. This is not 1994.

    25. Re:hmm... no by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      I know two people with Archos players. I don't know _anyone_ with a different player. The archos is currently one of the bigger portable video players in the UK.

    26. Re:hmm... no by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      The chances of it existing? -12.4% Center of this planet must solidify first.

      Don't know which planet you're living on, but the centre of planet Earth is actually solid.

      http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050418/eart hcore.html

      Thomas-

    27. Re:hmm... no by Kawsper · · Score: 1

      I see that some of their players contains the Microsoft technology called "Plays for sure", despite its name that might seem nice, the technology isn't well supported under Linux. Their players aren't open enough.

    28. Re:hmm... no by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Seriously, man, most people don't know what DRM is. Some of them might know their iPod with their work PC as well as their home one, and that annoys them. But they probably don't know it's an anti-piracy measure. It's something you can easily explain in layman's terms, and which they can immediately appreciate the harm of, because they've experienced it themselves. But try to explain to Joe iPod that Apple's trying to lock him in to buying only iPods forever, or that there's every likelihood that the record industry will start making DRM ever more restrictive once the public are sufficiently complacent about its presence, and he'll glaze over. And even if he does humour you, he'll still think you're a paranoid nutcase, no matter how right you are.

      Simple truth is, in the world outside Slashdot and its environs, people don't understand the value of freedom until they lose it, and they don't particularly mind, nor even notice, it being taken off them piece by piece. You'll never make them understand. The powers that be are well aware of this, and currently seem to be pushing their luck as far as they think they can get away with, only to keep finding that nobody's bothered. So to suggest that people will "flock" to a DRM-less, open machine is hopelessly naive. People just don't think that hard. They buy iPods because a) Apple told them to, b) everybody else has one, c) they're shiny. And for most of them, it's Good Enough, and so they've no reason to think about how much better it could be if only they did their homework before purchasing.

      You want to make an iPod killer? Make it smaller, make it prettier, make it at least as easy to use, don't worry about whizzy features, and make it 15% cheaper. Then market it down everybody's throats. It's pretty much exactly how Microsoft have always done it, and I wouldn't put it past them to relegate iPods to nostalgic reminiscence status in, say, five years.

    29. Re:hmm... no by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      A good way to explain DRM is to discuss region encodng in DVDs; "Did you know that you can't play a US DVD on your UK player?" "Yes, I saw something about it. Why is that?" "Because the MPAA broke your DVD player, hoping to make more money."

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    30. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that McDonald's lost billions in dollars when rolling out the mexican franchise? I didn't think so...

      How about Sony and Nintendo, do they lose billions of dollars over the first few years of a console launch? Nope.

      You seem to be confusing initial and on-going R&D investment with the fact that MS is selling the X-Box _at a loss_ and, as such, is hemorrhaging cash on the product.

      Does a loss of 4 billion dollars on a single product mean nothing to you? Any other "sane" company would consider the X-Box to be a commercial disaster, but not MS and its supporters. If you are a satisfied X-Box consumer then good for you, but don't try and suggest that the X-Box is a commercial success and that losing billions on a family consumer product is normal business.

      Once again, who do you think will be putting MS back into the black if their plan to buy market-share with the X-Box succeeds? Gullible consumers like yourself who will pay through the nose for MS products and then thank MS for the privilege of doing so.

    31. Re:hmm... no by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Decoding video ain't that hard, son. This is not 1994.

      What are you talking about? The number of video codecs you would have to support now far outnumbers the handful of codecs in common use back in 1994.

    32. Re:hmm... no by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You don't know anyone with an iPod?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    33. Re:hmm... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - and somehow people aren't flocking to it in droves. Could it be that...
      ...it costs almost $700 on Amazon? Could it be that it is a very niche product, especially at that price? That toy is beautiful enough to give any geek a hard-on, but that's not the same as buying. It targets a very specific niche, because for that price you could almost buy a portable DVD player and a Mac Mini or a low-to-mid range PC, and get all of the flexiblity of those devices.

  7. The killers.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    ok, why is everything an ipod killer these days? I've seen everything from cell phones to game consoles labelled an ipod killer.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:The killers.. by minginqunt · · Score: 1

      Meh.

      That's why the iPod's dead.

      No... wait. That can't be right.

    2. Re:The killers.. by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The killers? hmm...

      Somebody told me, that you had a handheld, that looked like a Newton, that I had in february of last year...

      I'm sorry, it's early and wouldn't leave my head. Will it be stoning, or am I to be drawn and quartered?

    3. Re:The killers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard Gallagher was working on an iPod killer. He calls it Sledge-o-matic.

    4. Re:The killers.. by JasonKChapman · · Score: 1
      ok, why is everything an ipod killer these days? I've seen everything from cell phones to game consoles labelled an ipod killer.

      Maybe it's just wishful thinking from people who actually enjoy music. Let's face it, the iPod has done for digital audio players what the eight track did for hi-fi. Would it have killed them to spend a little extra development time to deliver gapless playback, a real equalizer, and Ogg Vorbis support?

      Help me, Rockbox, you're my only hope.

      --
      Sorry, I'm a writer. That makes you raw material.
    5. Re:The killers.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      I dont know about the rest, but " Ogg Vorbis support?" becasue literally, no one other than a tiny tiny handful of people use it. And looking at how big a deal it was getting OGG working oh a portable (what was it? a floating point issue?) , it is really not worth the extra cost. Of the few people who even know what OGG is, fewer have OGG files even fewer will buy ipods. Do you see how in apple's eyes, it is basically some obscure format no one really uses?

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:The killers.. by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Would it have killed them to spend a little extra development time to deliver gapless playback, a real equalizer, and Ogg Vorbis support?

      Oh no no no, what you're looking for is 'ipod killer extreme'

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    7. Re:The killers.. by JasonKChapman · · Score: 1
      I dont know about the rest, but " Ogg Vorbis support?" becasue literally, no one other than a tiny tiny handful of people use it. And looking at how big a deal it was getting OGG working oh a portable (what was it? a floating point issue?) , it is really not worth the extra cost. Of the few people who even know what OGG is, fewer have OGG files even fewer will buy ipods. Do you see how in apple's eyes, it is basically some obscure format no one really uses?

      That's kind of my point, though I'd argue that it's used by somewhat more than "a tiny tiny handful" of people. The iPod was designed to be a lowest-common-denominator kind of player in the same way that eight tracks were targeted at people for whom flipping over a cassette tape was too complicated. It's popularity has effectively lowered the general expectations for audio quality coming from a DAP.

      --
      Sorry, I'm a writer. That makes you raw material.
    8. Re:The killers.. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      Considering I had no idea what an 8track was (aside from some kind of tape that is the subject of jokes) and have never even seen one, I actually had no clear idea what your analogy meant. It would be interesting to know how many other people actually got what you meant by ipod is like an eight track. After looking at the wikipedia article (linked for anyone else who might be intersted) I actually thought you meant it was an inexpensive portable. You may as well have been taking about records and wax cylinders on a gramaphone.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    9. Re:The killers.. by Robaato · · Score: 1
      The iPod was designed to be a lowest-common-denominator kind of player in the same way that eight tracks were targeted at people for whom flipping over a cassette tape was too complicated.

      That analogy only makes sense if you ignore the fact that the 8-track predated the cassette tape by almost a decade.
  8. Hopefully by gurutc · · Score: 1

    They won't be able to screw up power supply issues by using standard batteries.

    --
    Moderation in All Things... Especially Moderation - gurutc
    1. Re:Hopefully by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      They won't be able to screw up power supply issues by using standard batteries.

      Would that matter if they screw up usage with copious about of DRM and the 'we will only play DRMed' audio approach that Sony tried using,.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  9. Well.. here's a toast.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May the new EverythingPortable-killer be as financially successful (*cough*4billion*cough*) as the first X-Box!

    Cheers! :P

  10. I don't think so by protomala · · Score: 1

    Look at xbox 360, mainly in japan. I don't see it killing even PS2, even more Revolution or PS3. I don't see MSN search killing google. I don't see windows security better than Linux/Mac. Or I am blind, or microsoft hype machine is a lot of dry icq giving somke to press.

    1. Re:I don't think so by Darth+Maul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm.... in Japan even the Gamecube is selling better than the 360.

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:I don't think so by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Although Internet Explorer was a Netscape killer. :-)

    3. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refurbished Dreamcasts and Wonderswans outsold the 360 in Japan, but I digress.

      Microsoft's awsome all-in-one mega device will certainly be interesting, and even if they make a good job of it it's not going to be a 'killer'. It could create a new market, possibly steal a percentage of the market shares of the other single-purpose devices, but it wont be killing off anything.

    4. Re:I don't think so by joecr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How do you mean Linux is more secure then Windows? Is it because I have almost no options on controlling the permissions on my files in Linux compared to Windows? Or is it something else?

      One advantage to Microsoft in the security department is the NTFS file system. Unlike any of the file systems I've tried on Linux I can set permissions for more then just three groups & I have options other then just read, execute, & write. I know the owner, root & everyone else are the only groups I can change, while with the NTFS file system on Windows NT & newer I can configure several different groups, I can even deny permissions (a deny permission takes precedence over an allow permission, it you didn't already know) (I can't remember if you can deny permissions in Windows NT, I know you can in Windows 2000 & newer). If there was some way to add this feature into Linux I'd be much happier with Linux.

      I'm just curious why everyone says Linux is more secure when I can't even set permissions to the same level of complexity that I can with Windows. Also from what I've seen most viruses now take advantage of people being naïve or stupid about using a computer so please don't rant about the lack of viruses for Linux & that fact that Windows has a ton more. I'm quite sure if Linux had the market share that Windows has now it would become the target of virus writers instead of Windows. This is because it is a larger target & thus more likely to spread your virus.

    5. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are kidding, right? please MOD+1, Funny

    6. Re:I don't think so by TheBlackSwordsman · · Score: 1
      Umm.... in Japan even the Gamecube is selling better than the 360.


      For the longest time in Japan, even the original Game Boy Advance (the very first model with no clamshell design and a screen so dark you needed to attach a light to the thing to play) has outsold the Xbox. Microsoft's consoles have been a colossal flop in Japan.


      And as you said, even the Gamecube is outselling the 360. Currently the DS is king, though....

    7. Re:I don't think so by patio11 · · Score: 1

      I am going to be executing gamecubesSold++ as soon as the new Zelda game comes out, and I don't think I'll be alone.

    8. Re:I don't think so by catprog · · Score: 1

      Not me.

      I wil be executing revolutionsSold++

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    9. Re:I don't think so by tabby · · Score: 1

      do 360's outsell Gamecubes in Soviet Russia?

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    10. Re:I don't think so by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Viva La Revolution!

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, gamecube outsells you!!!

  11. Home Depot already have one by Timo_UK · · Score: 5, Funny

    in the tools section. It's called sledgehammer and is guaranteed to kill all of those devices in one shot.

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
    1. Re:Home Depot already have one by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Ars technica ran an iPod over and it still worked.

    2. Re:Home Depot already have one by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Sledge Hammer? Comon man, this is Home Despot, with a great deal of more destructive tools for rent/sale! For example, what about the Milwaukee "Big Daddy" breaker hammer? It's 44 Ft./lb. of blow energy, 1400 bpm, 15 amp, 120 Volt AC/DC. So thats like 23 powered blows per second! OH YEA WILL TURN A X-BOX to TINY PIECES IN LESS THAT A SECOND WITHOUT BREAKING A SWEAT! :) http://www.homedepot.com/prel80/HDUS/EN_US/diy_mai n/pg_diy.jsp?CNTTYPE=PROD_META&CNTKEY=misc/searchR esults.jsp&N=2984+3966&cm_ven=hd_goog&cm_cat=Searc h&cm_pla=D-25X&cm_ite=bid10101109-Power_Tools

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  12. Time to... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...dust off all your jokes about how big the Xbox is!

    Seriously though, with Xbox and Xbox Live MS has shown that they are capable of doing interesting, cool things with both consoles and gaming generally. I'll be interested to see what they come up with.

    1. Re:Time to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only interesting thing they've done is Live Arcade, which is really no more than Steam For Console, except unlike Valve, they actually pimped it out to developers in order to get real content on board.

    2. Re:Time to... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Owning a 360 I've got to say that I look forward to a portable device from Microsoft. The 360 is showing to be a great network device and the potential it has makes me salivate. PS3 looks good too, from what I can see, and the PSP is very nice; options are always good though. Many services are already lined up with PlayForSure so there is content already.

      Don't get confused, you will pay for 99% of the content. Don't think that any of these devices with DRM free - don't even look at one if that is your deal. Really, they are putting that upfront as well. Still, there are all kind of subscription services that do and will take advantage of Microsoft's size.

      I for one welcome our new, seamless content delivery overlords!

      Not really, but it is exciting because we've been asking for this for ages. Apple, Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo? are in the game. I like Microsoft's model the best though: they are allowing different content providers to use their devices and allowing other hardware manufactures to use their DRM. It makes Microsoft have to produce the best hardware (we shall see) and gives the consumer the choice of content providers. Apple gives you no choices (more are coming) and Sony likely will try to corner the market on hardware (and they own a few content companies).

      Provide these devices and keep the DRM off of our computers. Then I'll be happy.

  13. Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by Xocet_00 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, seriously. Can we (the Slashdot community) officially retire the term 'killer' and replace it with 'competitor'? It is possible for multiple manufacturers and products to exist in a market space simultaneously. Competition is good! We don't need or want new products to kill anything.

    1. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 3, Funny
      We don't need or want new products to kill anything.
      Speak for yourself. My bloody roses are covered with aphids.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    2. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by JWW · · Score: 1

      We don't need or want new products to kill anything.

      Yeah, WE don't but MICROSOFT does!!

    3. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by Xocet_00 · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but theoretically every company wants that.

    4. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      What, and remove the sensationalistic headlines that generate hits and therefore higher ad rates for the OSTG employees that run Slashdot? Never! Everything new is a "kiler," goshdarnit!

      And people say they stay at Slashdot for the journalism...ha.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    5. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by apoc06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      raise your hands, if you realize that the article is pure unfounded speculation based upon information almost a year old. for all we know the project in question is the dayum UMPC that theyve already revealed... this guy posted an ambigious title on his blog in order to drum up press for his book. [read first para]

      if microsoft was prepping a true handheld, the rumor mill would have been abuzz. the only handheld gameconsole MS is concerned w/ is the UMPC for now at least.

      with lackluster sales of the x360, i dont see MS greenlighting another expensive hardware launch anytime soon. they wouldnt risk splintering development across three [two consoles, if they decide to drop xbox1 support]; its not like they have an army of first party developers, much less third party houses...

    6. Re:Replace 'Killer' with 'Competitor' please by JWW · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. My company actually wants some compitetion on certain products to avoid anti-trust probblems. Of course, we all know that Mircosoft doesn't have to worry about that!!

  14. Don't think I want... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think I want an X-shaped console with a glowing green screen. I got enough objects in my pants that glow green in the dark.

    1. Re:Don't think I want... by Psiven · · Score: 0

      WTF....

    2. Re:Don't think I want... by nytes · · Score: 1

      I got enough objects in my pants that glow green in the dark.

      Maybe you should consider changing your diet.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  15. I can feel the pain by dada21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a MS fanboy, but I do have very good experiences with Microsoft over my lifetime. I've had some terrible problems, too, but nothing that has affected me in a bad way. I believe Microsoft's Windows has been a big reason why PCs are so cheap -- a common operating system that was easy to use has helped to bring more people to computers. I think we'd be in the 80s still if it wasn't for Windows 3.0 -- Apple had no chance given their closed hardware.

    My experience with MS in handhelds is terrible. I've owned about 30 PDAs in my life (I tend to use them for 3-4 months and then sell them to friends or family or give them away). All my Newtons were my favorite (from the original MessagePad through the 2100). I feel terrible that I sold all my Newtons years ago -- I think I'd still be using the beasts today.

    Microsoft doesn't know how to downsize anything. The big complaints about Windows from the geek crowd is more appropriate for Microsoft in the small-PC crowd. I had a Microsoft car radio once -- Worst. Thing. Ever. My current PDA is Microsoft based and it works very well wirelessly -- yet I have to reboot it about 10 times a day to get it to run fast.

    I have no faith in Microsoft in terms of an iPod killer. The X-Box is mostly a fluke to me -- a lot of money spent, very little profit made -- which means the item is NOT a success in terms of market viability. For me, the best products are those that make a profit, giving the manufacturer real reason to keep upgrading and supporting it.

    If the Microsoft 'iPod' killer is another spend-a-ton-and-earn-none fluke, it won't last. Microsoft needs a happy customer, and a happy customer pays a happy profit. Without that incentive, Microsoft will be fighting battles on too many fronts, and we know what happens to the imperialists that have done that in the past.

    1. Re:I can feel the pain by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I don't think Windows 3.0 is what 'dragged us out of the 80s' - someone would have done it on open hardware sooner or later. OS/2 2.0 wasn't that far behind (and was arguably better than Windows 3.1, which was its contemporary). Even if OS/2 didn't exist, then the X Window System was already around under an open license - and would have given the PC a GUI under Linux. Linux wasn't predicated on anything Microsoft were doing at the time. There are others - how long would it have been until DesqView had a GUI?

    2. Re:I can feel the pain by timster · · Score: 1

      Go easy on him; it's a common rhetorical tactic to preface an important criticism with an irrelevant compliment. This shows everyone that you are not a zealot.

      It's even better if the compliment has no possible association with facts; speculation on a world without Microsoft might be fun, but it's certainly impossible to prove anything.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    3. Re:I can feel the pain by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I ran OS/2 and DesqView -- in fact I ran DesqView for years longer than Windows 3.x (BBS days required a DOS-style multitasker). Both systems were amazing, but none ran as worthy as Windows 3.x did. In my first years using a scanner, the Windows OS was nearly flawless (I remember my old HP ScanJet Plus). The Windows OS gave me a solid X.25 connection that I could never get working properly under OS/2 or DOS. Windows also gave me that "standard" hardware interface that let me juggle my work better than under OS/2, which had many driver flaws.

      Maybe saying we'd be stuck in the 80s is a bit shortsighted, but I know that Windows did a lot for the PC world -- without it who knows how long it would have taken for a PC to be under $300 as it can be had today. I recall paying $3000 for a 286 back in the DOS days! I haven't bought a $3000 PC since Windows 95, and will likely never have to again.

    4. Re:I can feel the pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had some terrible problems, too, but nothing that has affected me in a bad way.

      What exactly is your definition of terrible?

    5. Re:I can feel the pain by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I'm not a MS fanboy, but I do have very good experiences with Microsoft over my lifetime. I've had some terrible problems, too, but nothing that has affected me in a bad way. I believe Microsoft's Windows has been a big reason why PCs are so cheap

      That's totally untrue; the percentage of a PC's price that is taken up by Windows licensing has crept steadily upwards for the last several years. PCs would be much cheaper if not for Windows; the price going down overall is simple commodotization, in spite of MS's charges to OEMs.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    6. Re:I can feel the pain by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      I've heard similar reasoning from other people. But I'd have to disagree, Microsoft has not brought down the cost of a PC in any way.

      You mention PC's under 300 dollars. If it has a windows operating system on it, it accounts for around half the cost of the PC. Yes, computers used to be ALOT more expensive, but I, among others, would attribute this to hardware costs (Microsoft OS hasn't gone down THAT much).

      Microsoft software does not subtract from PC cost, it only adds. But Microsoft definately has been a big factor in the adoption of PCs in every home.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    7. Re:I can feel the pain by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it IBM, by lending its name and open design (except for the BIOS, which was reversed engineered by Phoenix(?)), that made the PC a commodity?

    8. Re:I can feel the pain by ereshiere · · Score: 1
      I think the GP's point was that the culmulative effect of Windows over the past 15 years has been to bring PC hardware prices down--VGA controllers, for example, became much much cheaper once every user needed one to use Windows. EGA and the like completely disappeared once Windows 3/3.1 took over. Hard drives got far bigger, too.

      I will agree with you that the price of a Windows license (not to mention Office) has not really dropped. Paying $300 for a system with Windows (even if Windows is half of that cost) is certainly a far cry from paying $2000 for a comparable PC in 1991.

    9. Re:I can feel the pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no faith in Microsoft in terms of an iPod killer. The X-Box is mostly a fluke to me -- a lot of money spent, very little profit made -- which means the item is NOT a success in terms of market viability. For me, the best products are those that make a profit, giving the manufacturer real reason to keep upgrading and supporting it."

      Xbox made a profit? (Hint: No, it lost Microsoft over 4.5 billion dollars and continues to do so, considering unsold backstock that isn't moving.) Xbox 360 is not helping things at all, either.

      Microsoft is destined to leave the gaming industry sooner or later. They simply don't know what they are doing.

  16. e-sassination device by fatduck · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you'd bother to RTFA you'd know that the device in question is in fact a full-spectrum multi-wavelength high-energy data scrambler that will actually melt the circuits of any iPod/DS/GBA/PSP or Pacemaker within 100 meters. Can't wait to hear about the military applications.

    --
    Making you think you're crazy is a billion dollar industry.
    1. Re:e-sassination device by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1


      If you'd bother to RTFA you'd know that the device in question is in fact a full-spectrum multi-wavelength high-energy data scrambler that will actually melt the circuits of any iPod/DS/GBA/PSP or Pacemaker within 100 meters. Can't wait to hear about the military applications.

      It's called "vapor-izing" the competition.

  17. Wow by incubus13 · · Score: 1

    and how will they call it? Terminator?

    --
    if I could change the world, it would have a reset button
  18. One thing it will kill for sure by gurutc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    is batteries, judging by my Pocket PC's black hole of power.

    --
    Moderation in All Things... Especially Moderation - gurutc
  19. Happy by 3CRanch · · Score: 1, Funny

    This should be a happy occasion!

    Think about it...just another platform to port Linux to ;)

  20. Y.A.K. by SirCyn · · Score: 1

    Yet Another Killer. Does anybody believe these guys anymore?

  21. 1 problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has a such dominance into car and other aftermarket item integration, it's going to make it impossible for other vendors unless they can make use of that existing infrastructure.

    1. Re:1 problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people consist of probably much less than 1% of the Ipod market....

  22. It's all about timing... by Byzandula · · Score: 1

    The iPod has been extremely successful for Apple and it continues to gain market share. Microsoft is giving competitors an additional year to gain popularity, so I doubt very highly that Microsoft will be able to grab a decent chunk of the pie. It will be yet another failed all-in-one device. Unless of course it can cool my beverage, warm my feet, and allow me to play GTA while scuba diving in Bermuda.

    1. Re:It's all about timing... by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Yep, it surely will. Warm your feet, that is. Not exactly positive about the other functions, though.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  23. One Word by Mr_Tricorder · · Score: 1

    vaporware

  24. Ballmerstein? by ceeam · · Score: 1

    So, they gonna construct a Steve Ballmer replica?

    1. Re:Ballmerstein? by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      one question then a statement. . .
      would it indeed be Ballmerstein, or would it be Ballmerstein's Monster?

      but the only way they could improve on the real Ballmer is by splicing in Chuck Norris' DNA. Unfortunately, the LAZER eyes would only interfere with the round-house kicks!

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    2. Re:Ballmerstein? by mranchovy · · Score: 1

      So, they gonna construct a Steve Ballmer replica?

      No, that would be a furniture killer......

      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
  25. Too little too late? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    Microsoft jumped into the console wars at the right time to grab a foothold. I'm not sure they'll pull off the same coup with handheld entertainment. iPods are so entrenched that the mainstream media doesn't seem to be aware that any other players exist. The PSP has had moderate success, but then we're talking about the handheld product from the console juggernaut.

    MS making an attempt at the handheld market was inevitable, though. Sooner or later they had to do it.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  26. Bloatware by Ekarderif · · Score: 1

    And I thought the PSP had too many features...

  27. *YAWN* by Karyyk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all intents and purposes, the PSP should have killed the DS from a technical viewpoint. Fortunately, ingenuity in the gaming industry can still make up for somewhat lesser tech. Nintendo has rules the handheld market since 1989, and I don't really see that changing anytime soon. Besides, Microsoft, at best, will come up with a Windows-running, $400 handheld with a 3-hour battery lift. I'll pass.

    1. Re:*YAWN* by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to know why the DS is killing the PSP then you need to look at economics.

      the DS is less t han 1/2 the price of a PSP and the games as well are near 1/2 the price as well.

      This alone will guarentee much higher market share.

      the PSP is a really nice device, it's pretty, elegant, and cool.

      but adults make up a small portion of the Handheld games sales. preteens make up the bulk and parents would rather have little Jimmy break a $139.00 device than a $270.00 or more device. Parents will shell out $19.99 for a game readily and without a fight. Parents do NOT like paying $50.00 for a game for a portable.

      Sony loses because they took a expensive device andthen crippled it and ensure that it's games would be expensive.

      The PSP could have edged in if sony quit being asshats and not only allowed the hacking community to continue but encouraged them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:*YAWN* by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "The PSP could have edged in if sony quit being asshats and not only allowed the hacking community to continue but encouraged them."

      They're there, active, and successful nontheless.

    3. Re:*YAWN* by computechnica · · Score: 1

      What the PSP needs is a Writable UMD drive for a PC or a Sony DVR.
      Dishnetwork is selling a Video IPOD killer but it only work with certain DISH-DVRs.

    4. Re:*YAWN* by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      To quote Tycho from Penny Arcade:

      User experience on the PSP - while the system is off, at any rate - really is amazing.

    5. Re:*YAWN* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For all intents and purposes, the PSP should have killed the DS from a technical viewpoint. Fortunately, ingenuity in the gaming industry can still make up for somewhat lesser tech."

      First I heard of this.

      Signed,
      Game Gear, Wonderswan, & the Atari Lynx.

    6. Re:*YAWN* by macshit · · Score: 1

      the PSP is a really nice device, it's pretty, elegant, and cool.

      It also suffers from SCE's typical tunnel-vision and arrogant attitude -- they were so fixated on the display, and on "kewl" design, that they gave it crappy controls (the controls are clearly something they just slapped on at the last moment without much thought other than "don't ruin the look!") and made it too heavy and otherwise awkward to carry around.

      It basically seems optimized for sitting on a pedestal in a store displaying a demo movie... where indeed, it does look very pretty.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:*YAWN* by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      >For all intents and purposes, the PSP should have killed the DS from a technical viewpoint.

      Reminds me of the TV program "Pirates of Silicon Valley" where Steve Jobs is saying "You know we have the better product" and Bill goes "That doesn't matter". Or something like that.

  28. There's a tech cemetery filled with "iPod Killers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again, people in the high-tech industry don't seem to understand why the iPod is so successful - it's because it's extremely easy to use, beautifully designed, and it does a handful of things that people really, really want, really, really well. Period.

    People are getting damn tired of electronics companies trying to cram every single capability into a hand-held device. When you do that, you invariably get something that's mediocre at EVERYTHING it does, and it fails. The first company to create a combination PDA/games player/music player/cell phone/pager/GPS/digital camera/laser pointer/nose hair trimmer/vibrator, all for only $499!... is almost certainly going to fail in the marketplace.

  29. They can try... by Enselic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt they will be able to create an iPod killer because that would mean they had to change the behaviour of hundreds of thousands of people.

    A behaviour is exceptionally hard to change, especially if it is based on an already well working service.

    1. Re:They can try... by onetwentyone · · Score: 1

      If I had some mod points, I'd defintely put you over the top. One of the key elements in selling a product is to get people to WANT your device MORE than the devices they currently love and enjoy. This becomes harder and harder to do as a particular product moves from consumer accessory to necessary tool.

  30. "talented" individuals from microsoft by x1101 · · Score: 1

    "And Microsoft has some of its most seasoned talent from the division that created its popular Xbox 360 working on it."

    so it will be released is next to insignificant quantities, overheat horribly, be reacalled within weeks, and be replaced with a [insert handheld name] v2.0

    --
    "{09f911029d74e35b/==\d84156c5635688c0}"
  31. For starters by wobedraggled · · Score: 1

    Make a home console that doesn't have issues.

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  32. What it takes to kill an iPod by platypibri · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Look. There are ALREADY portable digital players out there with more features for less price that work with Windows only. Killing the iPod involved creating a sleek, hip player with a simple, intuitive interface, and an integrated content provider which has all of the same characteristics. iPods look cool and work well; iTunes is easy to use and has the fairest DRM out there. And the way iTunes is blowing away everyone else shows we want to buy our music easily and own it, not rent it.

    Someday there might well be a product that comes around that is more hip than the iPod. I'm pretty sure about two things, 1) It won't try to cram a bazillion features into an ugly product (Oragami?) and 2) Microsoft probably won't be responsible.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    1. Re:What it takes to kill an iPod by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You almost got it, but what *really* takes to kill the ipod is quite simple:

      Hype

      Plain and simple, what the iPod has is a lot of marketing and hype. As you stated there already are portable digital players with hell more features than the iPod (personally I preffer the iRiver series since I got my frist cd-mp3 player imp-300 a long time ago).

      I can think of at least one reason why Microsoft is not the /adequate/ company to come up with the killer. I believe it is more likely to come from a telephone company like Motorola that have more idea on how to make cool design products.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  33. I wouldn't be worried. by Philodoxx · · Score: 1

    Considering the XBOX has lost 4 billion dollars for Microsoft over the past four years and they don't have market dominance, I wouldn't be at all afraid of anything J Allard is going to be bringing to the table. p.s. I own an XBOX, I'm just saying that his track record making "killer" devices is somewhat spotty.

    --
    Oh, a lesson in history from Mr. I'm my own grandpa.
  34. MS missing the point of iPod yet again by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't want a brick that's large enough to play video/games on. I want a music player that's small enough to fit in a pocket and be generally unobtrusive.

    1. Re:MS missing the point of iPod yet again by Angostura · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where's my insightful mod points when I want them.

      Then again, I still use a Palm V because I want a PDA to be a simple, small cheap PDA. So I'm probably not the target demographic.

    2. Re:MS missing the point of iPod yet again by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      My brother has a Creative Zen Micro he likes. It's about the size of the old 5 stick packs of Wrigley's Spearamint.

  35. i'd be tempted to get one... by revery · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is developing a PSP/DS/GBA/iPod-killer

    I'd be tempted to get excited about this, if they would simply add "cell phone", "refrigerator", and "automobile" to the list of things this product kills.
    That's the kind of hype I could actually get behind!!!

    1. Re:i'd be tempted to get one... by omega9 · · Score: 1

      That's the kind of hype I could actually get behind!!!

      And he was like.. and she was like...

      She's all.. he's all.. we're all....

      I can't get behind any of that!

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  36. Microsoft iPod Killer by astonishedelf · · Score: 1

    Guess these guys are incapable of learning from past mistakes. The size and form factor of the device is one thing I am sure that Microsoft will get right. The problem will be in the GUI. Gaming devices require a different GUI to MP3 players to work successfully. Compromises get you nowhere. Apple has learned that lesson as has Nintendo with their GBA, ec. I remain unconvinced that battery life, robustness, different user requirements of the various devices can be successfully married. Wish these guys luck though - would certainly make an interesting addition to the market.

  37. Might not be 'killers'... by baker_tony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft might not be producing any real 'killer' products (well, not until the 3rd iteration from history), but if they start throwing themselves at the competition, then the competition is gonna start freaking out and producing an even better product, one would hope. So stop dissing Microsoft for having a go.

    1. Re:Might not be 'killers'... by hey! · · Score: 1

      If you're a company that runs on cash cow monopolies, winning is nice, but not necessary.

      It's good enough that the other companies lose, at least in the short run. Given your endless flow of cash, you may gradually squeeze off their air supply. Even if this doesn't happen, you don't want anybody else to have a cash cow in the barn where you keep your cash cow, because you understand the power that owning the cash cow brings.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Might not be 'killers'... by baker_tony · · Score: 2, Funny

      You were brought up on a farm, weren't you?! :-)

  38. Killah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it also spread Worms, Viruses and get infected by Trojans?

  39. Calling it that. by JPriest · · Score: 1

    "Ipod Killer" has become a codeword for "Won't sell". Maybe they shouold call it an Xbox killer, those seem to be more successful :)

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  40. MS business plan by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    1 - Obtain list of most popular gadgets. 2 - Tout latest MS product as "[names of all said gadgets]-Killer." 3 - Ignore collective groan of entire human race. 4 - Profit..?

  41. Let's do the vapourware boogie by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well well MS "announce" a "product" to preemptively compete in a market without actually having to enter that market. Perhaps one of the PSP-killing features will be the ability to download games over the Avalanche file sharing protocol.

    Despite any pretences this thing is going to be 3 years late, the size of a shoebox, and it will be a slightly reconfigured WinVista PDA. It's primary function will be to "deliver" windows DRM. The ability to play some games will be secondary. MS will shore it up with an inexhaustible slush fund much like the xbox in order to subsidise the infiltration of windows DRM into common home appliances.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    1. Re:Let's do the vapourware boogie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's jigawatts. Get your fake science right!

    2. Re:Let's do the vapourware boogie by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
      yeah but google's calculator thingy doesnt recognize "jigawatts". and besides gigawatts is pronounced with a soft G.

      http://www.deloreanmotorcar.com/ec/jigawatts.htm

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  42. The killers..RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "ok, why is everything an ipod killer these days? I've seen everything from cell phones to game consoles labelled an ipod killer."

    Open Source Software will be Proprietary's killer.

  43. Microsofts Linux/OSX/BSD/AIX killer by mgblst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So this is to go with Microsofts Linux/OSX/BSD/AIX killer and Microsofts PS3/Revolution Killer and Microsofts Oracle/MySQL/PostgreSQL/PeopleSoft/Dbase Killer?

    Sure a lot of killing going on.... supposedly.

    1. Re:Microsofts Linux/OSX/BSD/AIX killer by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1, Funny

      You forgot Microsoft's new product: The Chair Killer.

    2. Re:Microsofts Linux/OSX/BSD/AIX killer by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      Sure a lot of killing going on
      Chairs can be lethal!

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    3. Re:Microsofts Linux/OSX/BSD/AIX killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to f*cking kill you for make jokes of my company!!! ...now where did I leave my chair?

      S. Ballmer

  44. geez, i'm so bored i counted the ^Hs n/t by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    eom

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  45. Early Ad Sneak Preview by Mignon · · Score: 4, Funny
    Great timing. I found this on Google last night:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3609953966 5548298

    1. Re:Early Ad Sneak Preview by neddy1 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about that video is if you look at the new Mac Mini (intel) box, you will notice that apple marketing is taking a page out of the "The more bullet points the better!" advertising 101 hand book. I thought apple was above that?

  46. Why not just go the whole nine yards? by tukkayoot · · Score: 2, Funny
    Microsoft should just go the whole nine and make it a cell phone killer as well. Also, include some scanners in the hardware so it can function as a preemptive tricorder killer.

    Also, they should be sure to implement a fold-out cutting blade, screwdriver, corkscrew, can opener, toothpick and nail file so it can kill swiss army knives as well.

    This is the product the global marketplace has been waiting for.

  47. Drunk by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    My Sharp SL-C3000 Zaurus does whatever Microsoft wants to do in a handheld already, therefore whatever MS comes up with is all hype and bollocks.

    I'm drunk at the moment and even I could tell you that.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  48. But wait... by VxJasonxV · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... didn't the Origami already get announced?

    1. Re:But wait... by martinmarv · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent up - surely this is just spurious late speculation about the Origami project? There was that video of someone playing Halo on an Origami-type device, and it's already been touted as a media player
      TFA seems low on detail, high on "unnamed sources"...

    2. Re:But wait... by ronanbear · · Score: 1

      no. This is gonna be an origami killer! A product squashed is still a product squashed and Microsoft could do with a few more success stories lately.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
  49. Another one for the Ipod Killer Museum ... by amelith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exhibit no 2213 is housed in the west wing of the museum. This is a late (very late) 2007 Ipod Killer made by a now defunct company from Redmond that some people on the tour may remember. Like many of our other 3000 exhibits it suffered from being late to market, overhyped and having a battery life of approximately 27 seconds. The user interface also attracted severe criticism, based as it was on their then popular desktop operating system, that I believe was called "Panes XP" or something.

    Move along please, there's always plenty to see in the Ipod Killer Museum. New Exhibits are arriving all the time!

  50. What I don't get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    is why all these companies are out to build an 'iPod killer' when the iPod itself was an "MP3 player killer" that blew them all out of the water in the first place!

    I have an RCA MP3 player from around 2002(I think? it was a gift) that has very little capacity, runs on AAA batteries and is basically the little MP3 player that couldn't. In order to make it really worth carrying around spare AAA batteries, you would have to purchase an SD card to expand the available storage, unless you have 4 songs that you absolutely love to hear over and over again. THAT kind of MP3 player is what the iPod was up against when it came out as an MP3 player with a harddrive.

    Gee, let me think... $100 for a 32mb (maybe) MP3 player, and then another chunk of change for SD cards to listen to more than 20 minutes of decent sound quality music and changing AAA batteries every day, or $200-300 for an iPod with gigabytes of storage, a rechargeable battery and a great navigation menu that displays the name of the artist and song.

    General Public: Hm, let me think about that one, and while I think about it, let me look at the designs of the "other" MP3 players vs the iPod..

    /sarcasm a little help making the decision may be necessary.../end sarcasm

    at a time when everyone else was creeping into the market and peeking through the doorway to see if there were enough people on the other side in the portable MP3 player market to make it worthwhile to go in, Apple busted down the door and slapped the iPod into the hands of 20-30 year olds and blew the roof off the market. And now everyone is playing catch-up, claiming their latest and greatest will dethrone the iPod.

    I'm sorry, but Apple already stormed the market with a great design, the best software for the job, and a legal method of getting the MP3s to the people. Just give up and start selling accessories for iPods and try to make a profit off of things that change color with the beat of the music.

  51. Don't tell me... by oahazmatt · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Microsoft bought the rights to Gizmondo, didn't they?

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  52. Last successful X-killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was the last time Microsoft successfully created any X-killer?

    They killed Netscape... anything after that?

  53. Not THAT ridiculous. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course any portable game system MS makes would be hyped as a DS/GBA/PSP killer; those are the competing products in that category. The MS marketing department would have to be pretty braindead NOT to claim that their as-yet-unreleased system is better than the stuff that's currently on the market.

    That leaves "iPod killer" as the only questionable assertion. Well, here's how I read it: the system will have either a hard drive or a decent amount of flash memory. This would be great on a portable for all sorts of reasons (e.g., you could download the games to the system rather than carrying around 50 tiny cartridges). A WMA/MP3 player would only be one fairly simple app on such a system, so they may as well stick it in there and add another tick on the checklist.

    Will it be a better MP3 player than an iPod? No, but who cares? The PS2 is a pretty terrible DVD player (low quality, clunky controls, noisy as heck), but it was that feature that convinced me to buy it over a GameCube.

  54. Sony already tried by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And about the only thing the PSP seems to be killing is... the PSP.

    If Microsoft wishes to do the same thing as Sony, making a "gaming" handheld that does everything but actually play games, they'll get the same results.

    Granted, they may make a better movie player than the PSP (depending on the specifics), but Microsoft is already losing the format wars with Apple over music formats (much like Sony) and if they aim for squeezing the "latest and greatest" in graphics and sound technology into the gaming function, it certainly isn't going to be as small as the iPod (like Sony). And, finally, like Sony, there'll be little more than "portable" (i. e. watered-down) versions of console games (read "Halo Lite").

    1. Re:Sony already tried by iainl · · Score: 1

      True. To give Microsoft their dues, Windows Media Player sucks an awful lot less than Sony's SonicStage.

      But it's still sucking in comparison to iTunes.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  55. In other news by MadJo · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer is overheard saying: "I'm going to f-ing kill Apple/Nintendo/Sony." while smashing chairs.

  56. Mkay by Strell · · Score: 1

    I take it this thing is going to be bald, but try to convince me it isn't with its nice leather case, Converse shoes, and indie music.

    --
    I'm not scared of anonymous cowards.
  57. An x86 based portable gaming machine? by hattig · · Score: 1

    I can't see Microsoft veering away from that aspect, this will be x86 based, unless they're planning on using Windows Mobile running on a next generation StrongARM + third party 3D graphics accellerator (ATI Imageon?).

    In a year's time the PSP's hardware will have gone through at least one process shrink - it'll be cheaper and it will have a longer battery life.

    It will be extremely hard for Microsoft to enter this market, never mind compete. They've got the resources, but unless they can somehow make it play XBox1 games it'll just be ignored. I suppose they could try the classic 'price it $150 under cost' technique.

  58. It's already been done... by Panascooter · · Score: 2

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3609953966 5548298&q=microsoft+ipod (google video) This is one of the best parodies i've seen in a while.

    1. Re:It's already been done... by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 1

      Thats classic, great link! It illustrates the difference between Apple's and MS's philosophy perfectly.

  59. price tag? by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

    So, its going to combine an iPod (retail price ~$300) and a PSP (reatail price ~$200).
    There is no way this thing will be able to reatil for less than ~$400.00. At that price point (for a handheld) they've priced themselves out of reach for all but the most hardcore, affluent gamers. /me clutches my DS

    And I thought $150.00 was a bit much.

    (Speaking of the DS, I need to buy Tetris tomorrow...)

  60. uhuh by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when I see it (even then...)

  61. Competition is good! by ursabear · · Score: 1

    If they pull it off in a way that the worldwide public will really like it, then it can be a good thing if it provides decent competition... (without monopolization, of course).

    But seriously, my only worry is how the portable's over-heating-giant-power-dongle-on-a-cord (borrowed from the 360) will fit in my iPod wristband...

  62. Batteries mean you can only "kill" once. by Lave · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Portable devices that replace multiple portables will only do so when one critical flaw has been addressed. The Battery.

    I like my DS being separate to my phone because, I can play it and not worry about killing my battery and not being able to receive calls.

    I can listen to songs on my mp3 player as I sight-see, and not have to worry that I'm going to kill the battery before I get to the big sights I want to take photos off.

    If a business man is on the tube, he likes his blackberry an iPod to be separate because he won't miss any email after listening to music on his commute.

    Unless your device can run for over a day - whilst doing everything - continually - then I don't want the stress of balancing battery needs. Portable devices are about reducing stress, "all-in-one" devices don't do that, no matter how many times you write "killer" in the title.

    --
    http://skeptobot.blogspot.com/ - A site for the Renaissance man and woman
  63. Did MS forget the mobile phone? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    Did MS forget the mobile phone?

    Or is MS stopping it's mobile phone activities?

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
    1. Re:Did MS forget the mobile phone? by wurstkuchen · · Score: 1

      Right, it could be an N-Gage killer too!!

  64. Spell (etc) checker, anyone? by Threni · · Score: 1

    >before thie device

    thie?

    > if it hits daylight

    Things don't "hit" daylight, they "see" it. Good grief. Sometime's it semes like ane fukwit can submitt story's to Slash-dot!

  65. I'm thinking of doing one next week by hachete · · Score: 0

    Sledgehammer. Big as fuck. Go 'round *every* itunes store.

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  66. Yanno by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yanno what? From now on, let's just keep a handy supply of large trout on hand, and use them to beat anyone who uses the phrase 'iPod killer' to death.

    --
    Unpleasantries.
  67. PSP died in the womb. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    The PSP isn't killing anything other than itself. Its too big and bulky and only accepts proprietary memory sticks and UMDs.... I see whay more people with an iPod than ith a PSP. And you can watch movies on an iPod without buying limited usefullness UMDs which are anything but "Universal" Movie Discs.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:PSP died in the womb. by plumby · · Score: 1

      You can also watch movies on the PSP without buying a UMD, assuming you've got a big enough Memory Stick and a DVD ripper. The PSP screen is (IMO) infinitely better than the iPod for watching movies - I've tried both on long trips, and wouldn't even consider using the iPod for this again.

    2. Re:PSP died in the womb. by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      "Its too big and bulky..."

      obviously you have no idea that the DS is currently in first place in the current handheld console generation. if you think the psp is big and bulky, what do you think of the DS? lol.

      besides we all know MS's console track record. if they /were/ to create a handheld console, you best believe it would be huge.

      i see way more people with psp's than ds's, but the ds is still #1. i see way more people with ipods than ds's; the ds isnt "killing" the ipod.

      as for watching movies on a psp, its easy to look down on it if you dont own one. umds are smaller than dvds and more portable, but most people prefer to buy their own dvds and do the ripping themselves. an optional $60 purchase nets you enough space to encode almost any movie you wish. try to compare watching a movie on a psp to watching on a current generation ipod's screen and /then/ let me know what you think.

    3. Re:PSP died in the womb. by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's track record is not all that great. The xbox did quite well and in my opinion the jury is still out on the xbox 360. Sony and Nintendo haven't even entered the market yet on this generation. Many thought the Sega Dreamcast would do well because it beat its competition to market. Look how that turned out! If you compare the Dreamcast and the xbox 360 there are a lot of similarities.

      As for the *killer notition, I'd like to see ANY company come out with a decent PDA/Phone/MP3 Player that can actually store at least 1000 songs at decent quality, run for over 10 hours doing music/pda tasks and still have at least 3 hours of talk time. When I say decent PDA, I mean it must have 802.11b/g, a color display, web browser that views REAL HTML/XHTML based websites, calendar, address book, todo list, and can actually sync with more than one operating system. Right now, I lug around a cell phone, iPod and PDA (until my cat ruined it). The PDA and iPod overlap except i like a digital todo list. I don't care what OS this device would run, but it must sync with one of my computers properly. As a bonus, if it weren't my windows pc i'd be extra happy. Of course the device shouldn't be huge either.

      I don't see why people want to watch video on tiny screens regardless if its a psp, ipod, or whatever. Playing games on my gba gives me headaches after 30 minutes, i can't image watching a tv show or movie on one.

    4. Re:PSP died in the womb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the DS is a NICE bit of bulk. Two screen, both protected... if it was smaller, it'd make my hands hurt like a bitch. It's still lighter than the original Gameboy.

    5. Re:PSP died in the womb. by BodhiCat · · Score: 1

      Why this drive to combine everything into one? Part of the reason for the popularity of the iPod is that its small, light and easy to carry. Add a few button and a bigger screen for games and it becomes too bulky for its original mission. This same sort of combine all into one thinking is what ruined the Me 262, a German jet designed during WW II as a fighter that Hitler insisted be used as a bomber. KISS, keep it sweet and simple, Jobs knows that, too later for Hitler, but Gates need to learn before he throws development money at another "killer" device.

  68. Why can't Apple just enjoy a success? by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    The iPod was a great idea. It was packaged well, marketed intelligently and coupled to a service people wanted. And it has survived every iPod killer to come along so far.

    If MSFT would focus on building quality software that lasted for years, instead of trying to push people into product activation forced upgrades they wouldn't need to try and intrude into the home entertainment market.

    MSFT reminds me of a manure spreader. Desperately flinging shit in the air every direction trying to find something that sticks. Instead of producing quality software, supporting it, and making their upgrade path intelligent and predictable. But nooooo. They have to try and kill Google and Apple's iPod instead of forging their own success stories. Pathetic.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Why can't Apple just enjoy a success? by TgmBxA!X8(TNDWr_,+xv · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is fundamentally insecure; they have this pressing need to prove they're better. (Of course, they think bigger is better.) It's borderline pathological.

  69. The /. post right below this one.. by LordJezo · · Score: 1

    "Early Adopters Experiencing More Bugs?"

    Prophetic?

  70. How will it kill them? Here's how. by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

    The XBoyStationPod^2 will literally crush its competition with its incalculable bulk.

  71. "The power to innovate" by simong · · Score: 1

    Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

  72. Microsoft killed SPAM by guitaristx · · Score: 2, Funny

    This new thingy is going to kill the iPod just like Microsoft killed SPAM - they're going to redefine 'kill'. I suppose they'll put an EKG on an iPod and declare it dead.

    --
    I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
  73. And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Monopolies are legal, but they used to be controlled, when the law was actually enforced and "conservative" judges weren't appointed to short-circuit it.

    Monopolies are damaging because they can leverage their overwhelming advantage (=money) into new markets, conquering one product segment after another, erecting barriers to entry to new competitors, and most importantly, monopolies can prevent new technologies from dislodging their old tech by using extortion in all sorts of ways (in the classic case, "put Linux in your boxen, in any way, and say good-bye to your Windows discount, hell, good-bye to your Windows boxen).

    Microsoft is building "killer" after "killer", using their infinite cash from their Office and Windows monopolies to simply underprice their products in new businesses like game machines and portable media players until their competitors, who don't have monopoly cash, fold. Then, classically, they raise their prices in their new monopoly, then use the cash to move into a new monopoly. This is why we busted the trusts after the Guilded Age. Inevitably, one company will own everything. Microsoft wants a media tax worldwide, wants a piece of every media streamed and stored. Then they'll inevitably move into media creation; hell, that's what they're doing in video games. Vertical lock.

    1. Re:And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What's better?

      1) Microsoft leveraging their cash supply to create a video game industry in a fraction of the time it would take another company to, or

      2) The Japanese controlling console gaming for the rest of time?

      Personally, I prefer option 1.

    2. Re:And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I prefer option 1.

      Why? Nationalism doesn't seem like a very rational reason to prefer M$ monopolies.

    3. Re:And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      You completely mis-state the reason that monopolies are regulated. There is completely no problem with a monopoly leveraging some resource to enter into a new market, as long as they are entering the market on equal footing. The illegal part of a monopoly is to use their monopolistic power to underprice the competition through aggressive pricing.

      That means that if some monopoly can build a widget for cost of $x, they are not allowed to price it for $y if yx. As that would be the abuse of monopoly size to price the competition out of the market. (Even this is not a hard rule, because some industries function like that, for example the razor+razor blades or game systems+games) That was exactly the reason for the monopolistic actions against the old railroads.

      The specific action that Microsoft was found to be abusing the monopoly power for was bundling. The problem there is to use your monopoly in some area to gain market in another area by combining two products. If Microsoft was selling Internet Explorer without combining it with the OS, then it would not be abusing the monopoly in OS for a new product. That would be a legal way for a company to grow the portfolio.

      So if microsoft is willing to spend the money to develop a new product, but doesn't abuse the monopoly for pricing or bundling - then it is a completely normal way to enter the merket.

    4. Re:And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by Turken · · Score: 1

      1) Microsoft is not trying to "create a video game industry." They are trying to buy out the existing one.

      2) If having the Japanese control console gaming is what it takes to keep the industry from tanking, I'm all for it! As it currently stands, I'm seriously considering learning the Japanese language just so I can import and play some of the interesting (fun, creative, and or quirky) games that I always hear about being released there, but know will never get brought to the US.

      And the other nice thing about learning to speak/read Japanese is that it will add another country to my list of potential places to move to when the government and personal freedom here collapse from all the "patriotic" and "security" s*** legislation that has been spewing out of D.C. these past few years.

    5. Re:And this is why we (had) monopoly control laws by releppes · · Score: 1
      What in the world is wrong with option 2)?

      At one time, there was this big motto to "buy American" and support your country. In principle, this is a great idea. However, welcome to the 21st century. Corporate America is NOT serving America's best interest. Corporate America is serving their own personal interest. Why do you think there's such a demand to "outsource"? Buy American so you can support the rich who are putting the poor out of a job? Microsoft is no different. They're investing their future into India, not America. Not saying India is bad, just saying Microsoft's "economic" future is not vested in America. At least I can respect the Japanese and how corporations are run over there. They actually have a cap on CEO salaries compaired to general workers. The American government is not the same government that existed when "buy American" was a slogan. The government today is so heavily influenced by corporations, that it hardly has real power to do what's right for the country.

      This is unrelated, but did anyone find the "SUV Tax incentive" the most corrupt thing on taxes this year? It's a tax break targeted specifically at very large SUV's. The ones that sit in the $50k market. It can't even be used by vans and trucks that fit the same weight class. It's only for SUV's and only for the real expensive ones. Now, why on earth is there a "special" tax break incentive for that one specific market and nothing else? It benifits people who really have money and it benifits the auto industry that makes a totally wasteful product. It's a poor example, but it supports my conclusion of a corporate controlled America.

  74. *YAWN* by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    More Innovation Through Impersonation. I think Microsoft's addiction to markets is the issue here. They want the search market, they want the MP3 player market, they want this they want that. They end up with a lot of products that are fair, some that are great, and all of this diversification siphons attention away from perfecting things like Windows. They want it all. I hope they persue it all, frankly. Maybe they'll start making cars, toilet paper, TV's. The more money they can waste the better. They will not get the search market under the name "Microsoft" because people equate that with MSN. They won't kill the iPod because Apple already gives the client away and has a player that is practically ubiquitous. C'mon, Microsoft, keep dumping money into stuff other than Windows so you can lose that market too!

  75. I have the *PERFECT* name for the new MS device! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's call it the "Vapor!"

    What do you think? :)

  76. Oh Roffle. by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 1

    J. Allard, eh? So does this mean that this handheld will also fit his vision of an 'open chips and cards' console? I can see it now, the Microsoft X-Brick... Weighs twice as much as the original X-box controller, is half as ergonomic, and also doubles as a portable space heater. Why can't they hire someone who actually has an ounce of common sense when it comes to design when they do these things?

  77. iPod/DS/PSP Killer? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, shit, Miscrosoft is releasing Windows for these platforms, aren't they?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  78. Re:hmm... yes - gp2x by boron+boy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ever heard of a gp2x?

    Sure, no wifi, but the rest of it rocks.

  79. Core competency by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple's core competency seems to be design. Their hardware and software products in general are aesthetically pleasing, easy to operate, and fun to use.

    Could it be that MS, in trying to be all things to all people, has lost sight of its core competency?

    Is leveraging their Windows/Office hegemony Microsoft's true core competency? If not that, what? It used to be marketing, but that's not true any more. What is the core competency of a company that has been riding on the dominance of its desktop OS and office software for over a decade?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Core competency by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Could it be that MS, in trying to be all things to all people, has lost sight of its core competency?
      Shouldn't that be "core incompetency"? There are two or three things taht MS does well, or perhaps there are two or three things at which they don't suck. However, those largely involve hornswoggling timorous managers into believing that they won't get fired for going with MS. Consumer electronics don't really fit into that.

      I think their main problem is that, as a company built upon turning things into a commodity, they don't really have innovation in their DNA. And now they are so big that, to maintain the growth that they see as success, they have to innovate. But their inertia alone would make that difficult, and it isn't how they've really done business. I think they're looking for anything that might have enough ROI, but the industry is too nimble for them and they'll always be playing catchup on things outside their core (the OS and Office) unless some major, major changes happen. And those changes only will happen when they no longer have the advantages they do now.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  80. Neutrality? by Tom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know /. is more a blog than a newspaper, but some more neutrality would be nice.

    Anything that's more than a year away from market simply can't be an anything killer, yet. At least a prototype should be ready before anyone judges whether it'll be a killer product or tank.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  81. The terrifying thing about that video... by alispguru · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... is that it was made by Microsoft marketing. They know what their problems are, and they essentially admit they haven't a chance in hell of fixing them. That's why they'll never develop an iPod killer, much less an iPod/DS/PSP killer.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:The terrifying thing about that video... by aafiske · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what kind of bizarro world that you live in, but around here it's considered good when you know what your problems are. I'm as dubious as anyone that Microsoft will come up with an iPod killer. However, claming 'they know what they're doing wrong' as the reason they will do it wrong seems ... well, wrong.

    2. Re:The terrifying thing about that video... by macshit · · Score: 1

      That's the weird thing about MS -- it's full of really smart people, they do great research (and funny videos if they're marketing, I guess), but ... the only stuff that seems to actually reach the end-user is bland, homogenized, creaky-ass crap. It's like there's a "suck" layer in the middle that just sucks the soul and goodness out of all the innovative work the smart people at MS do.

      [Ok, some of the good stuff does make it, but it's chocolate sprinkles on top of ... all the other stuff.]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  82. Linux by Hwyman · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to inflict some penguin love on that thing!

  83. It's the end of the world as we know it. by rs79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I stull can't get live.com, their google-killer to work. At least I get to wait a year until I can't get their iPod killer to work.

    Oh well. Back to trying to get windoze to work.

    Why do I get the impression that if Microsoft invented sex then your genitals would simply exlode if you became aroused?

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  84. Duh! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    It's the MS Sledge-Hammer (XP?)

    It'll also kill cell phones, PDA's, and errant fingers and toes.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  85. Really? by Mabonus · · Score: 1

    I only wish I could have been the first to say: 'HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA'

    The pendulum is not swinging their direction. If you ask me, people are more interested in simple, well made devices that do one thing well, and in that light no one device is going to 'kill' all of the bits they claim they're taking on.

  86. Stop it. Just stop it. by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Sick of iPod-killer stories. Not gonna happen.

  87. Another one? by �berhund · · Score: 1

    Everybody's got an iPod killer. Still it lives on.

    --
    -Uberhund
  88. iPod Terminator by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    But first they need to make a flesh coating and send it back in time. "Are you Jonathan Ive?"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  89. Killer by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

    I can see it now: Bigger than a PSP, Unstable as Windows CE, One Eighth the battery life of an ipod, And of course all the usual delights of using a windows device.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  90. one thing's for sure - by roedelius · · Score: 1

    it's going to enhance your life, change the way you interact with your surroundings, and/or emotionally alter your productivity possibilities.

  91. Re:MOD THIS GUY DOWN! by nasch · · Score: 1

    Dude, he's mostly slamming MS.

    "I've had some terrible problems"
    "My experience with MS in handhelds is terrible."
    "Microsoft doesn't know how to downsize anything."
    "I have to reboot it about 10 times a day to get it to run fast."
    "I have no faith in Microsoft in terms of an iPod killer."
    "Worst. Thing. Ever."

    And you think this guy is a MS shill??

  92. And.. by Kankraka · · Score: 1

    Because it's made by good ol' MS, it will be riddled with battery sucking DRM. Oh, and my giant OGG collection will be useless, as will my mp3s I'd imagine. Even then I'd have to find a way to get it to sync with linux, because it definitely won't act like an external HDD or a piece of flash memory. Then I'd have to get windohs media player to run, because that would probably be the only way to get music (probably converted to .wma on the way) ON to the unit. So all in all, it will be a great fiasco with VMWare or a native install of XP. Even still, I'd rather just have the option of sticking a 1gb SD card in my card reader, loading it up with what I desire, putting it in my mp3 player (THAT ONLY PLAYS MUSIC!) and then going. I don't care if my hand held game console doesn't play music. If I want to listen to music, I'll use a device souly made for that purpose and get a better experience anyways. Gaming devices and media devices shouldn't be stuck in the same unit. It hinders performance, battery life, and possibly proper use because it's just more crap to go wrong with it.

  93. Obligatory "Soldier" Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What are you going to do?"

    "I'm going to kill them all, sir."

  94. It'll run Office too by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1
    and you'll be able to haul it around on the handy cart you can purchase as an option.

    I can't wait! Anybody want to buy a used iPod? This just sounds so much better.

  95. First game by haqatak · · Score: 1

    I've heard that the first game that will be released on this platform is Duke Nukeem Forever

  96. ipod killer is easy - free advice by xtal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I should be a product consultant.

    Make what the mac people are crying for.

    The device must be the same, exact form factor as the current gen ipod.

    Make it out of aluminum or titanium with a matte or beadblasted finish.

    The screen should be the entire front of the device.

    It's only user input; the touchscreen and perhaps a single scroll wheel. NO MORE. Think about inertial input in a second release. MAYBE.

    Put a video and headphone jack on it.

    Put 802.11 on it and stop being a bitch to the media industries.

    Make it with open programmable interface and a real OS.

    The only user interface and application options should be just what the ipod has - a video player, audio player, and basic little apps like the ipod has.

    Let the market fill in the gaps.

    Sell millions. When you do, buy me a ferrari, ok thanks?

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:ipod killer is easy - free advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as enthusiast sites like http://www.pspbrew.com/ are around to keep trying to do new things with psp's microsoft cant do it.

  97. how to kill the iPod by drew · · Score: 1

    Of course, somebody at Microsoft already figured out how to kill the iPod over a year ago:
    http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2004/12/19.html#a 8932

    It's so simple-
    1) start a blog
    2) pay out the *ss for big name music stars and podcasters to design it.

    How could the top brass have ignored this foolproof plan for so long?

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  98. Taking the focus away from Origami... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess MS has to announce something new in order to grab headlines after seeing how poorly the POS known as Origami was received.

  99. Are the posters human? by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

    Its a serious question, it seems like there is some kind of bad algo generating these topic titles!

    its a fucking warzone, everything is killing everything else. How about "Microsoft to construct iPod/DS/PSP hybrid"???

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
  100. A kernel of truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why do I get the impression that if Microsoft invented sex then your genitals would simply exlode if you became aroused?"

    While with Open Source Genitals, the ball driver has to be reverse-engineered before it can be used. Then you don't have all the features that closed Genitals have like "fire and forget", and "quick release". In the mean time you have to spend weeks fiddling with it till everything clicks.

    --
    The "are you a script" word for today is "releases".

    1. Re:A kernel of truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> In the mean time you have to spend weeks fiddling with it

      And the problem with this would be? I actually enjoy fiddling with "my bits" ;-)

  101. This is just a rumor by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

    but I heard they're modeling it like the 1985 Walkman, only bulkier, heavier and a TON more buttons.

  102. Re:I have the *PERFECT* name for the new MS device by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

    Seriously, let's just call it the "Xpod". That way we can be sure it'll fail in Japan.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  103. Re:replacement killers by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I think they're working on a replacement called Strider HoneyMonkey. At first I thought it was just Arwen's pet-name for Aragon, but apparently not.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  104. Headlines of tomorrow by moochfish · · Score: 1

    Microsoft announced today it will be creating a TV/Phone/Electricity/Food/Desk/Soda/Car/Lawmower/A nnoying Baby/Lamp/Watch/Shoe/Cheap Labor/Headphone/Pen/Umbrella/Pocket Knife/McDonalds/Train/Tire/Sock/Hat Killer device.

  105. what he will do... by pizpot · · Score: 1
    Here you go Mr. Gates, I am finished.

    I've mounted a battery to your XBox, now use these straps to put it on your back and voila, iPod killer all the way. Oh, here, hold this 14" LCD monitor, and erm put the mouse on the screen, now click "Start", "Programs"... I mean "All Programs" yes, uh no wait, start over. Click on the background. Now right-click on the Start button, then Explore. Where are your mp3's?... *sniff* *sniff* Whoah Hell your butt is on fire *spank* *spank* *spank* it's almost out sir *spank* *spank* *spank* OK, are you OK? Take your pants off... (CENSORED...)

  106. Wrong market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to kill so much stuff, why not just make a gun?

  107. They can't kill anything by jbplou · · Score: 1

    Come on now, the XBOX was supposed to kill the PS2 and that didn't happen, the XBOX 360 hasn't even been able to kill its rivals and they aren't even available yet. Kill the PSP and IPOD with one device, please a Microsoft device will have so much bloat it will need dual core processors just to run the portable OS, so that it can multitask MP3 playing while editing Word files and playing a game of Halo. Because Microsoft can't make something that won't let them show an example of some exectutive editing a Word file while doing something else.

  108. Re:There's a tech cemetery filled with "iPod Kille by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

    It's like putting internet and IM on a cell phone. Trying to type words on a number keypad is depressingly inefficient. Think about what goes through your mind when you're chatting with a friend and he's using a cell phone. It takes forever to type a message and you're word limit is rediculously low. Cell phones do internet and IM badly, which is why it's not very popular. Then Blackberry comes along and improves things with the keyboard.

  109. here is the marketing for this new killer by wardk · · Score: 1
  110. DMCA by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can also watch movies on the PSP without buying a UMD, assuming you've got a big enough Memory Stick and a DVD ripper.

    Is a DVD ripper legal for residential end users to obtain and use in those countries where the PSP is sold? See DMCA, AFTA, national implementations of EUCD...

  111. monopoly = albatross by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    ...those changes only will happen when they no longer have the advantages they do now.

    Excellent point. The Windows/Office dominance is actually an albatross around their necks, in that it has allowed them to create this massive infrastructure to perpetuate the Windows/Office paradigm. They can't engage in creative destruction, because to do so would imperil their primary revenue stream.

    Perhaps all those proposals we heard a few years back about splitting up MS really do make some sense. If MS voluntarily split itself into three or four different companies and made the Windows/Office component strictly a licensing arm, they could potentially turn their slide around. However, I find the probability of them splitting the company to be about equal to Ralph Nader being elected President.

    When MS reaches the Pit of Dispair that IBM reached in the 1990s, we'll see them innovating. Either that, or they'll slide on for a decade or two before being gobbled up by 37signals. ;-)

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  112. Airfare to DMCA-free jurisdictions? by tepples · · Score: 1

    most people prefer to buy their own dvds and do the ripping themselves. an optional $60 purchase

    Virtually all major studio DVDs are encrypted with CSS. Sixty dollars is generally not enough to fly to a DMCA-free jurisdiction, rip one's DVDs, and fly back.

  113. Memory Stick PRO Duo by tepples · · Score: 1

    What the PSP needs is a Writable UMD drive for a PC

    The PC has the next best thing: a rewritable Memory Stick PRO Duo drive. However, with this setup, you can only record from television; you can't transcode any CSS-encrypted DVD under applicable law in the United States, the United Kingdom, or Australia. Among developed countries where English is the national language, this pretty much leaves Canada and New Zealand.

  114. Battery life is key by tepples · · Score: 1

    Game Gear and Atari Lynx failed in part because the amount of play time from 12 alkaline batteries was abominable compared to that of the original Game Boy. Wonderswan failed in the United States because it was never advertised in the United States nor sold in national chains.

  115. I said this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew Microsoft was going to be releasing a portable system to compete with the Sony PSP and Ninshito DS. They will release it, and when they do, GOOODBYE NINSHITO!!!!!!
    WOOT! WOOT!

  116. Re:hmm... yes - gp2x by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    ...and like the GP32, which could already play DivX movies when the Gameboy Advance was new, the GP2X will only be known to a handful of people. Regular people won't shell out 200 bucks for a portable and serious gamers will buy a PSP instead (because that' where all the big brand games are)... It's not likely that the GP* will ever be big in the West. Quite sad, I always thought that Gamepark's offerings were exciting, although prohibitively expensive (at least for a student).

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  117. Nope by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1

    Lets just state the facts here. Nothing from Redmond is going to 'kill' the iPod. Aint gonna happen.

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
  118. Killers? All these companies kill one thing..... by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    and that's my wallet and bank account with every new gadget! :)

  119. Made by the same people that brought you XBox... by Otonotachibana · · Score: 1

    Made by the same people that brought you XBox...

    There is a name for handheld objects that can light things on fire. We call them grenades.

  120. The only 'killer' products ... by Dhrakar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are the ones that are NOT advertised that way. The iPod was never sold as a 'killer' of some other MP3 player. For that matter, the PC itself was not sold that way. Each of these things was promoted based on its own merits -- and not on how it compared to other things. What is it with our hyper-competitive culture now that always has to find 'The only one'?

    1. Re:The only 'killer' products ... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      You know what's interesting...most people thought that the iPod would not do well. It didn't even take off very well until about the 3rd generation...so yes, the iPod was never designed to be a "killer" device...it just turned out that way...

  121. all I have to say is: by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

    I love bash.org...
    http://bash.org/?431786

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  122. Ha, that's funny. by KBAegis · · Score: 1

    Hey, yet another product that will overheat itself and melt in a pool of it's own malificence.

  123. Not enough features. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    There seem to be those who won't be satisified with any hand-held device priced at several hundred dollars until said product provides the same service as for which one might be required to spend several hundred dollars per hour, room and minibar not included. ...it seems, though, that it is all functionally equivalent to just using your hand.

  124. Watch the video by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    A whole lot of comments, not a lot of real knowledge. Why not watch the video, as it addresses some of the more troll-like responses. You can view it in Media Player at: mms://wm.microsoft.com/ms/uifx/asp_net_atlas.wmv

  125. DISREGARD by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    Posted to the wrong thread. That is what I get for having two Slashdot tabs open at the same time.

  126. Hype machine? by Elsan · · Score: 1

    Why does it have always have to be a "killer"? It's just a competitive product. Each time something is labeled "killer", it usually doesn't even fare well in the market(maybe not in features). I think it's preposterous to label something "killer". I understand that it is the objective of it but it nevers happens, it competes, yes, but does it really ever kill something completely(please don't go naming examples, for Tux's sake!). Why label it killer(again, even if it is the objective) if the product isn't even finalized? I figure it's just to build the hype...

  127. Easy to do! by crhylove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now given MS doesn't have the greatest track record on their first offering into a new competitive area in the tech market, but dominating the DS and PSP and iPod and even Cell phone industry would be pretty damned easy if you ask me.

    Just do these 6 things:
    1. Make it out of real metal and indestructible. Brushed Aluminum, or even Titanium, or Stainless steel. Real Glass for a cover.
    2. Make the battery last and charge over a standard USB connection.
    3. Give it plenty of capacity. (hopefully with no moving parts).
    4. Make an interface that doesn't completely blow. I like the Sony Ericsson interface, kinda, but it's a tad slow.
    5. Avoid load times on anything. Lose all the crappy shortcuts to features people almost never use.
    6. Avoid all DRM. Just use mp3s (or even ogg!), and divx (or xvid!). Fuck aac, wmv, all those.

    If you do those 6 things, everyone will buy it and use it. I'll be first in line.

    Eventually somebody WILL make these, and sony/ms/apple/etc. can all kiss their non competing product lines completely good bye.

    Again though, I seriously doubt MS will do it, as they are so married to wmv, and all their other own crappy ideas that nobody but porn spammers really like to use ever.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:Easy to do! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Um, it almost sounds like you're describing an iPod.

      1) Doesn't quite make it; the back is stainless steel, but the front is plastic over some kind of magnesium chassis.
      2) Already there, charges over a standard Firewire connection for the first two generations when it was discovered a 'universal' dock connector worked better. Now it can charge from anything: Firewire, USB, car charger, wall wart, external battery pack.
      3) Already huge; 4gb sans moving platters, 60gb with moving platters.
      4) Apple has arguably the best interface on the iPod already.
      5) Already done. Apple uses an index file stored in RAM to minimize spin up times for instant ID3 and metadata access, utilizes 32mb or 64mb of RAM to cache songs for instant access to the next handful of songs, and uses a hash table to store all their songs to minimize disk access to any song in your library.
      6) What do you think the original iPod did? Straight MP3, then added AAC. You dismiss AAC, yet think OGG and MP3 is okay? If patent encumbered MP3 is okay, what is wrong with similarly patent encumbered AAC? Here's a hint, MP3 stands for ISO MPEG 1 Layer 3, while AAC is ISO MPEG 4 Advanced Audio Codec.

      You're essentially asking Microsoft to re-invent the iPod; however why would anyone buy a Microsoft iPod over an Apple iPod?

      I think you need a different set of criteria for a true iPod killer:
      1) Must have a dock to support all iPod accessories
      2) Must 'appear' to be an iPod when plugged into a computer

      These first two criteria are similar to what allowed Compaq to originally flourish when they cloned the PC to create the current IBM compatible PC market.

      In addition you should have:
      2) Transparent codec support; aac, mp3, flac, ale, ogg, wma, etc. If it can support any and all codecs, then it should
      3) Built in wireless support for synching + headphones
      4) Support for sending cell phone calls, but not receiving them
      5) UI should be as simple as possible, and no simpler. Remove any extra button, option, and mode unless it is critical to the core usage
      6) Integrate it into HTPC as a remote, especially since it has wireless; upload and download of data, use as a pause/play/FF/RW, etc

      My logic is two-fold: First be compatible with everything iPod, to ensure the largest customer base. Second is to improve on the iPod; added wireless support, improved codec support, and the addition of two useful new features that 'come for free' with the addition of it's digital radio technology.

  128. Price and Features... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

    Right now, the 60GB 5G iPod can be had for ~$399...it does Video (and fairly decent video at that) and doubles as a digital photo wallet (with a $25 digital camera connector)...not to mention, there's currently a project to port RockBox to the iPod...

    There aren't many that even offer a 60GB option...none that are signifigantly lower in price, and have one or more of the following problems...they have poor build quality (I know this is opinion), poor firmware (also opinion), low battery life (compared to the 60GB Video), B&W screen, no video support, or no digital camera connectivity.

  129. in sweeps billy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, billgatesInc. 'innovating' again.

  130. A year? by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    from looking at the article it sounds like it's at least a year before this device, if it hits daylight, would be coming.

    Then how about we wait a year, if ever, before wasting /. frontpage bandwidth such uselessness. Or maybe a create a section http://vaporware.slashdot.org/ for these kinds of submissions.

    ...

    Heh, after having previewed the above submission, I see that /. automatically converts http://vaporware.slashdot.org/ to HTML, and clicking the URL directs you to the /. frontpage. Oh, the irony...

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  131. Killer by RichiP · · Score: 1

    See, that's what I dislike about Microsoft ... they're always out to kill. I'd appreciate it if other devices or apps die not because they were in any way excluded but because people just didn't prefer them.

  132. if its that orgami thing good l uck with that by deiong · · Score: 1

    if its that orgami thing good luck ms geting people to waste 700 bucks on that.. only thing it'll kill is itself when noone buys it. if im goign to waste taht much i'd rather get a much faster much better laptop. with a much wider screen.

  133. Yes, that was badly stated, wasn't it? by alispguru · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure what kind of bizarro world that you live in, but around here it's considered good when you know what your problems are.

    Yeah. What I should have said was "a few people at Microsoft clearly have a clue about why the iPod succeeded, but they'll have a hard time getting past the majority of marketers there."

    This video demonstrates that at least one person in Microsoft believes that their standard bury-the-customer-in-feature-lists approach (which works well selling complex software suites) isn't well-suited to portable music players. This person clearly feels that Apple's minimalist approach would never get past a Microsoft marketing review, which is why Microsoft will not be able to displace the iPod.

    Can't you hear the marketing people at MS watching this video and saying, "Yes! That's what we need to do!"
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  134. handheld market is not the same as the console... by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

    the handheld market has never supported more than one system for a very long time. the home console market usually has a couple competitors that are succeeding... this current generation, when we can easily say that there are three 'successes' (if you can consider the ps2 and xbox, which are both hemmoraging money for their prospective companies to be "successes") is really an amazing fluke: before sony entered, it was always just sega and nintendo. now that sony is a competitor, sega's out, microsoft is in, and only one of them is making any actual profit.

    now, the handheld market has always been different. there have been several attempts, but nintendo has always owned it. and once again, the only competitors that have even come close.. are sega (with their game gear, which failed because there weren't enough really good games, it ate battery life, and the graphic capabilities took precedent over gameplay) and sony (with their psp, which, in my opinion, fails for the same reasons the game gear failed: not enough games I actually want, eats battery, glitz over gameplay.)

    let microsoft try. I have serious doubt that anyone will ever dethrone nintendo from the handheld market. they've been doing it the longest, and they've done it the best.
    /fan-girl mode off.

  135. M$ Executive Killer Needed by ZoOnI · · Score: 1

    Why does a multibillion dollar company have to spend all of it's time chasing everyone else's ideas. Where is the creativity. How about making something new, something we need or solving a problem with software. This is just plain annoying.

    --
    "Never say Never."
  136. he should be arrested by alchemy101 · · Score: 1

    Wow so much killing going on Allard should be arrested!

  137. A PSP Killer? by CyberpunkJunkie · · Score: 1
    Just glancing through the article, one line stood out and has to be a piece of misinformation

    "Microsoft is designing a product that combines video games, music and video in one handheld device"

    Now, I don't own a PSP (Nintendo born and bred) but isn't the PSP a 'handheld device combining games, music and video' - how is this new? What can they possibly offer to drag me away, kicking and screaming, from my beloved GBA that I cannot already get in a PSP?