>> While (X) may be the law in (place), it is not the law globally (therefore pound sand)
Wow. And techies thought Microsoft was arrogant when dealing with Europe in the 2000s.
More to the point: how do I get to be a multinational corporation so I can tell local authorities to fuck off too?
I think you are missing a major point of the discussion. Google complies with French law in France. Google complies with EU law in the EU. Google did not want to comply with Chinese law in China, so they left China. The issue is that France is trying to force Google to comply with French law everywhere else. I hope you can see the distinction.
Turns out it was *I* who didn't know what the A stood for. When I replied to your post I was thinking it stood for 'Anti' as in Anti-global-warming. Add that to the fact you called GP a denier moron and you can see my confusion. Note my emphasis was on your use of the word denier, not moron.
The false advertising may have been a continuous thing, but the accusation of false advertising happened once, and has now happened again. The title is written correctly.
That's not cognitive dissonance. On one hand you have a teenager building a flying gun in his backyard in Connecticut. One the other hand you have the U.S. military taking out the bad guys half way across the world. Having two differing opinions on these two situations is not contradictory. Are the situations much more complicated and nuanced than how I described? Sure. But for most people, that's what it boils down to, so their reactions make sense.
According to this website: http://smartgunlaws.org/minimu... the federal minimum age for possession of a handgun is 18. But according to that same website, the minimum age set by Connecticut state law is 21.
You should have paid closer attention. Your "reward" will be 70 very ugly virgins riddled with various diseases who will constantly be fighting with each other, and who will always be jealous of each other. Plus they will have only one hobby - nagging at you. Have fun with your paradise, my friend.
Your sarcasm only makes sense if you think GP was serious. I hope that is not the case.
Your link only reaffirms what GP already recognized: astronomers combine all elements except hydrogen and helium into one large group calls "metals" and then measure an object's "metallicity". The question that was asked is why did astronomers choose to use the specific word "metal"? The word already had a very specific meaning in science and in common usage. So were the astronomers just being lazy or was there more meaning to the decision?
Not all motorists are calmed when they see my camera, but it seems many are (for example, they'll ease off tailgating me and shadowing my blind spots).
Wrong. The vendors WILL be able to offer reasonable technical assistance. Whether that reasonable technical assistance will lead to the prosecutors getting the data that they want is the question.
I'm not sure you and I are reading the same constitution in regards to corporations. Last I checked, the closest the constitution says about the subject is giving congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce. How this affects the power to issue interstate/intrastate corporate charters is in no way "clear" as you claim.
It validates their sub-point that Google makes the call, but it contradicts the main point which is that a court decided it should be this way, and therefore should get the blame.
Slashdot Mirror
>> While (X) may be the law in (place), it is not the law globally (therefore pound sand)
Wow. And techies thought Microsoft was arrogant when dealing with Europe in the 2000s.
More to the point: how do I get to be a multinational corporation so I can tell local authorities to fuck off too?
I think you are missing a major point of the discussion. Google complies with French law in France. Google complies with EU law in the EU. Google did not want to comply with Chinese law in China, so they left China. The issue is that France is trying to force Google to comply with French law everywhere else. I hope you can see the distinction.
Requiring a "duty to retreat" from the thief/murderer that came into your own home is not what most people think of as castle doctrine.
Ok. I hope you feel better now.
Turns out it was *I* who didn't know what the A stood for. When I replied to your post I was thinking it stood for 'Anti' as in Anti-global-warming. Add that to the fact you called GP a denier moron and you can see my confusion. Note my emphasis was on your use of the word denier, not moron.
Based on the the fact you called GP a "denier moron" it makes me wonder if you understand what the A in AGW stands for.
What meaning of the word "Citrus" were you going for here?
The false advertising may have been a continuous thing, but the accusation of false advertising happened once, and has now happened again. The title is written correctly.
That's not cognitive dissonance. On one hand you have a teenager building a flying gun in his backyard in Connecticut. One the other hand you have the U.S. military taking out the bad guys half way across the world. Having two differing opinions on these two situations is not contradictory. Are the situations much more complicated and nuanced than how I described? Sure. But for most people, that's what it boils down to, so their reactions make sense.
According to this website: http://smartgunlaws.org/minimu... the federal minimum age for possession of a handgun is 18. But according to that same website, the minimum age set by Connecticut state law is 21.
Turns out it's actually a cosine wave, dummy.
Milano is the spyware...
What's stopping academic research on ideas covered by patents?
The source of the grants/funding?
You should have paid closer attention. Your "reward" will be 70 very ugly virgins riddled with various diseases who will constantly be fighting with each other, and who will always be jealous of each other. Plus they will have only one hobby - nagging at you. Have fun with your paradise, my friend.
Your sarcasm only makes sense if you think GP was serious. I hope that is not the case.
See metallicity.
Your link only reaffirms what GP already recognized: astronomers combine all elements except hydrogen and helium into one large group calls "metals" and then measure an object's "metallicity". The question that was asked is why did astronomers choose to use the specific word "metal"? The word already had a very specific meaning in science and in common usage. So were the astronomers just being lazy or was there more meaning to the decision?
I believe he meant physically versus legally (contractually).
It might not matter as much as some things, and it might not matter at all to you, but that doesn't mean it doesn't matter.
Not all motorists are calmed when they see my camera, but it seems many are (for example, they'll ease off tailgating me and shadowing my blind spots).
You are on a bicycle. You have no blind spots.
The audit trail for every agency that has consulted your file? That IS part of your medical records, right?
Nah, man . . that there's just metadata !
Wrong. The vendors WILL be able to offer reasonable technical assistance. Whether that reasonable technical assistance will lead to the prosecutors getting the data that they want is the question.
I'm not sure you and I are reading the same constitution in regards to corporations. Last I checked, the closest the constitution says about the subject is giving congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce. How this affects the power to issue interstate/intrastate corporate charters is in no way "clear" as you claim.
Unless he mutation caused the almost-but-not-quite-chicken to mutate into a chicken, which then laid the first chicken egg...
Not really a single pixel camera, more of a single pixel light absorption meter taken over an area...
What is a camera if not a glorified light absorption meter?
It validates their sub-point that Google makes the call, but it contradicts the main point which is that a court decided it should be this way, and therefore should get the blame.
Let me guess: the settlement specifically states that they admit to no fault right?
Just out of curiosity, what is an undergraduate masters? I've only heard of degrees where one precludes the other.