from TFA: "If the Republican-controlled House approves the resolution, it would then move to the Senate, where Democrats hold the majority. The Senate is unlikely to pass the resolution."
summary fails to mention how this vote probably won't actually go anywhere.
Perhaps. But the folks who define science as witch-craft, speak in tongues and handle snakes (Mike Huckabee), think that if you're a good boy you get your own planet when you die (Mitt Romney), these people run things now.
The Senate will fall to these fools in time, and than it's all over.
This is not surprising. With a mandate to repeal all of the worker's rights that where hard-won during the early 1900's, and legislating the idea that science is witch-craft, this is not unexpected.
It may be "selling out", but it is also the first serious step in Nokia's death spiral. Honestly there is no longer any reason to pay attention to Nokia. If you own stock, think about selling it.
First Amendment, blaw, blaw, blaw... These children said these things out of school, it's none of the school's business.
Did you "read" the article? No, of course not.
They made false accusations of serious criminal activity. Is that sort of thing protected by the First Amendment? I'm not a lawyer.
Please get off your soap-box and live in reality. These children's little prank could have had (and possibly still can have) serious life-changing consequences for their falsely accused teachers.
Read this part to understand why it is still relevent (there are, after all, still cases pending):
So, my head is spinning, because what I'm thinking is: does this demonstrate that SCO knew there was no basis for their copyright infringement claims against IBM, Novell, AutoZone, and the world, at least by 2004? We'd have to do discovery on the matter to know for sure, but if they deliberately buried evidence, I would imagine it could impact damages due to SCO's victims, not just from SCO but conceivably from SCO's lawyers as well, should it be established that the litigation was frivolous and SCO knew it way back in 2004. I'm sure SCO's lawyers will have a long song and dance about it to deny it all, but it's certainly a huge red flag to me.
Will someone please FUCK ME RAW? I demand it, seriously. FUCK ME RAW. I'm a male, my ass is loose, would it be possible to have some young stud FUCK ME RAW? I'm interested in being tied down, gaged and FUCKED RAW. Are there any "cute boys" out there who like older guys and want to FUCK THEM RAW? Seriously, doesn't the idea of being FUCKED RAW excite you? Wouldn't you like to FUCK ME RAW? I'm thinking you might just like to FUCK ME RAW, but that's just an idea. Come on baby, FUCK ME RAW. Seriously, let's get down. and dirty, and put on some protection an FUCK each-other RAW?
This tells us the Obama administration will do almost anything to figure out who is leaking government information
Seems like something they *should* be doing... Seriously, leaking US Gov "secrets" IS against the law. So it only makes sense they are doing what they can to find the leak?
What's next? Slashdotters complain that the US Gov doesn't nothing to locate leaks because they are incompetent? Can't have it both ways...
Look, I just have to say, I'm *VERY* gassy. I mean explosively gassy. Seriously, you don't want to smoke in my car. I'm gassy. Do I care? Not really, because I like the smell. OH YEAH! I'm gassy.
It's interesting that the majority of Slashdotters will froth at the mouth at the mere mention of the Evil Flash, and claim that *they* have it blocked anyway...
But mention a device that ships without it, and it's "crippled"...
This is my biggest complaint with python (I have others, I'll admit I have little love for python). This is not the way to develop a language.
The problem with endless back-porting is that it stagnates any âoerevolutionaryâ development of the language. There are certain âoemilestonesâ where it makes sense to completely walk away from the old ways of doing something and move on. At a certain point, back-porting makes everything âoehalf-bakedâ.
On the other hand, are US Copyrights relevant and legally binding in Australia? Probably they are by virtue of treaties and such.
Seriously, not a troll, but what's the beef? We're lucky to see the CD at all...
Rather than raking Telstra over the coals for complying (albeit late) , maybe the more constructive thing would be to use it as an illustration to other companies as to how harmless it was to Telstra to comply - it did not hurt them competitively at all.
By giving Telstra POSITIVE FEEDBACK for complying, perhaps it will ENCOURAGE others to comply as well?
Of course you all can SHIT ALL OVER THEM and see how that works, as well...
Wow, I get that this has search and rescue applications, but the first time I read it I thought this was developed as a way to kill ejected pilots.
Exactly. I mean, these are *drones*, right? Since when is technology like this actually designed from the get-go for "good"?
Is this some sort of sick joke?
I for one am *not* amused by what is surly once again a sick, sick cruel abuse by the Military-Industrial Complex. Shame on garymortimer for submitting this astroturf, and even more shame on samzenpus for posting it.
They've got to you, haven't they, samzenpus? How much did they pay you?
I'm pretty sure the Chinese people don't want Green Dam...
I'm pretty sure that *SOME* of the Chinese people don't want the Green Dam (and quite frankly, the name sounds like a STD device), but how do you know that the MAJORITY don't like it? Just because we Westerners cotton to ideas of Democracy and the freedoms therein, doesn't mean that all people do.
Slashdot Mirror
So you hate niggers, right?
Good grief, a right wing religious nutter on Slashdot? Wow.
from TFA: "If the Republican-controlled House approves the resolution, it would then move to the Senate, where Democrats hold the majority. The Senate is unlikely to pass the resolution." summary fails to mention how this vote probably won't actually go anywhere.
Perhaps. But the folks who define science as witch-craft, speak in tongues and handle snakes (Mike Huckabee), think that if you're a good boy you get your own planet when you die (Mitt Romney), these people run things now.
The Senate will fall to these fools in time, and than it's all over.
This is not surprising. With a mandate to repeal all of the worker's rights that where hard-won during the early 1900's, and legislating the idea that science is witch-craft, this is not unexpected.
We are entering a dark age.
It's still a crippled OS even compared to Windows.
...Yet they will not take even consumer friendly Ubuntu seriously. IS the idea of Linux as a consumer friendly OS a dead end?
"Sure I'll fix your computer. If I get to fcku you."
So, Michael, how long have you been "into" your cousin? I think that's a bit creepy, but whatever floats your boat, I guess.
This is why I *never* log in anymore for the few times I "edit" something (and I use random IPs). It's hardly worth the time to edit anyway.
It may be "selling out", but it is also the first serious step in Nokia's death spiral. Honestly there is no longer any reason to pay attention to Nokia. If you own stock, think about selling it.
Ha, ha.. "funny". But not very. No, it will not. So what to do? Don't buy it if this bothers you? Or is someone holding a gun to your head?
I would recommend rinsing off the feces with a nice warm bath and soap and water.
I would recommend rinsing off your face with a nice warm bath in my steaming hot jizz.
Libel is not a crime, it is a tort.
You've never had my wife's pastries. They are absolutely a crime against all common sense.
First Amendment, blaw, blaw, blaw... These children said these things out of school, it's none of the school's business.
Did you "read" the article? No, of course not.
They made false accusations of serious criminal activity. Is that sort of thing protected by the First Amendment? I'm not a lawyer.
Please get off your soap-box and live in reality. These children's little prank could have had (and possibly still can have) serious life-changing consequences for their falsely accused teachers.
So, my head is spinning, because what I'm thinking is: does this demonstrate that SCO knew there was no basis for their copyright infringement claims against IBM, Novell, AutoZone, and the world, at least by 2004? We'd have to do discovery on the matter to know for sure, but if they deliberately buried evidence, I would imagine it could impact damages due to SCO's victims, not just from SCO but conceivably from SCO's lawyers as well, should it be established that the litigation was frivolous and SCO knew it way back in 2004. I'm sure SCO's lawyers will have a long song and dance about it to deny it all, but it's certainly a huge red flag to me.
Coming soon to a camera near you.
Only in the photos taken by their stalkers...
Will someone please FUCK ME RAW? I demand it, seriously. FUCK ME RAW. I'm a male, my ass is loose, would it be possible to have some young stud FUCK ME RAW? I'm interested in being tied down, gaged and FUCKED RAW. Are there any "cute boys" out there who like older guys and want to FUCK THEM RAW? Seriously, doesn't the idea of being FUCKED RAW excite you? Wouldn't you like to FUCK ME RAW? I'm thinking you might just like to FUCK ME RAW, but that's just an idea. Come on baby, FUCK ME RAW. Seriously, let's get down. and dirty, and put on some protection an FUCK each-other RAW?
This tells us the Obama administration will do almost anything to figure out who is leaking government information
Seems like something they *should* be doing... Seriously, leaking US Gov "secrets" IS against the law. So it only makes sense they are doing what they can to find the leak?
What's next? Slashdotters complain that the US Gov doesn't nothing to locate leaks because they are incompetent? Can't have it both ways...
Look, I just have to say, I'm *VERY* gassy. I mean explosively gassy. Seriously, you don't want to smoke in my car. I'm gassy. Do I care? Not really, because I like the smell. OH YEAH! I'm gassy.
I think you are out of line *forcing* other users to abide by your view of how the desktop should operate.
I haven't had this issue with Comcast Business (static IP). Port 25 works just fine. But, some recipients don't like us.
It's interesting that the majority of Slashdotters will froth at the mouth at the mere mention of the Evil Flash, and claim that *they* have it blocked anyway...
But mention a device that ships without it, and it's "crippled"...
This is my biggest complaint with python (I have others, I'll admit I have little love for python). This is not the way to develop a language.
The problem with endless back-porting is that it stagnates any âoerevolutionaryâ development of the language. There are certain âoemilestonesâ where it makes sense to completely walk away from the old ways of doing something and move on. At a certain point, back-porting makes everything âoehalf-bakedâ.
GPL: You need to comply only if you get caught!
On the other hand, are US Copyrights relevant and legally binding in Australia? Probably they are by virtue of treaties and such.
Seriously, not a troll, but what's the beef? We're lucky to see the CD at all...
Rather than raking Telstra over the coals for complying (albeit late) , maybe the more constructive thing would be to use it as an illustration to other companies as to how harmless it was to Telstra to comply - it did not hurt them competitively at all.
By giving Telstra POSITIVE FEEDBACK for complying, perhaps it will ENCOURAGE others to comply as well?
Of course you all can SHIT ALL OVER THEM and see how that works, as well...
Wow, I get that this has search and rescue applications, but the first time I read it I thought this was developed as a way to kill ejected pilots.
Exactly. I mean, these are *drones*, right? Since when is technology like this actually designed from the get-go for "good"?
Is this some sort of sick joke?
I for one am *not* amused by what is surly once again a sick, sick cruel abuse by the Military-Industrial Complex. Shame on garymortimer for submitting this astroturf, and even more shame on samzenpus for posting it.
They've got to you, haven't they, samzenpus? How much did they pay you?
I'm pretty sure the Chinese people don't want Green Dam...
I'm pretty sure that *SOME* of the Chinese people don't want the Green Dam (and quite frankly, the name sounds like a STD device), but how do you know that the MAJORITY don't like it? Just because we Westerners cotton to ideas of Democracy and the freedoms therein, doesn't mean that all people do.