Why shouldn't you be allowed to say no blacks should enter on your own personal website? Why in the world should you get sued for such a thing? It is your website...seriously.
My thoughts exactly . . . just more careully written out. Simply put, to argue with science based on a religious beliefs, is to not truely believe in the power of ones God.
I often wonder how truely Christian such parents are, who treat the children to such misinformation. There many things, that I simple understand that I do not understand. But my belief in God is strong enough that such things don't waiver it.
Anonymous or not, I have to agree here. WHy bitch about Google. They are not the internet. Why bitch on and on about Windows...if it is so bad, use something else. I hated IE since the days of warez.com, so I switched to Netscape ever since. These days I run Linux (fedora) as my primary OS.
I can understand not liking company X. And really, there are very few reasons to "like" any company. But you've picked the strangest of reasons to not like Google.
I often wonder what it would take to wake up the revolutionary in the American people that once seemed strong in them. Especially when I see people so suprised that people in the middle east are willing to die to protect their beleifs.
In all fairness, isn't that the reasoning the government, and related agencies use with regard to cryptography? That if you have nothing to illegal hide, you wouldn't?
Yah, I found their sudden burst of energy on the matter of the raid to be quite interesting. One can only wonder what illegal activities they have docuumented in their office.
I agree that it is non trivial, however, it seems more important considering the purpose of a phone. The last few times I have used a cell phone, I was no fan of the quality, but of course, that is subjective, and dependant on the carrier. I guess I am just erked, by all those "Beyond 2000" promises that have yet to materialize.
Slashdot Mirror
All that's missing is Führer Bradley.
Why shouldn't you be allowed to say no blacks should enter on your own personal website? Why in the world should you get sued for such a thing? It is your website...seriously.
This has not been my experience, based on some of the comments I see around here, and I am guessing Slashdot's web stats would confirm this.
I tried the chosen design in both links and lynx, worked fine for me, and was readable.
My thoughts exactly . . . just more careully written out. Simply put, to argue with science based on a religious beliefs, is to not truely believe in the power of ones God.
I often wonder how truely Christian such parents are, who treat the children to such misinformation. There many things, that I simple understand that I do not understand. But my belief in God is strong enough that such things don't waiver it.
Anonymous or not, I have to agree here. WHy bitch about Google. They are not the internet. Why bitch on and on about Windows...if it is so bad, use something else. I hated IE since the days of warez.com, so I switched to Netscape ever since. These days I run Linux (fedora) as my primary OS.
I can understand not liking company X. And really, there are very few reasons to "like" any company. But you've picked the strangest of reasons to not like Google.
But the US attorney general has seemingly promised to prosecute whistle blowers. That's a big first fear to overcome, esp. if you have a family.
I often wonder what it would take to wake up the revolutionary in the American people that once seemed strong in them. Especially when I see people so suprised that people in the middle east are willing to die to protect their beleifs.
How true. I gave a speech about this at a public speaking class. I got a good grade, but the audience seemed unmoved by the information.
In all fairness, isn't that the reasoning the government, and related agencies use with regard to cryptography? That if you have nothing to illegal hide, you wouldn't?
`tis going to be a wee lonely boycott.
Nope. They can have their buzzword. Really seems a non-issue to me.
Seems like you're doing more advertising, than either, since most of us didn't read that far, it at all.
Fried of course.
Yah, I found their sudden burst of energy on the matter of the raid to be quite interesting. One can only wonder what illegal activities they have docuumented in their office.
Maybe they need to form a cooperation then.
Maybe a little less instant messaging time for the employees then.
I agree that it is non trivial, however, it seems more important considering the purpose of a phone. The last few times I have used a cell phone, I was no fan of the quality, but of course, that is subjective, and dependant on the carrier. I guess I am just erked, by all those "Beyond 2000" promises that have yet to materialize.
So wait. I am not a geek because I want just a phone? How about CD quality audio for my calls instead of a web browser?
I agree with you 100% . . . although, I wouldn't go so far as to call your fellow Americans pussies, but I you know them better than I do.
. . . it sucks to be a Windows user.
Sounds like a plotline for an episode of South Park.
It was too expensive.