Block text may not be the optimal layout for readability but it certainly better for use of space.
Is the cost of reduced readability worth it for the space compression achieved?
I personally highlight bits while I'm reading, it helps me focus and read quickly anyway.
I suppose it will be useful in advertising...
"yet there have been very few successful UK startups"
I'd argue that there are plenty, I've applied for jobs at many. There may not be any on the scale of Google but there are certainly plenty of successful startups.
I'd stay skeptical of such a claim until there is a peer-reviewed paper out.
Perhaps you should look for one!
A good place to start is here: http://www.virart.nott.ac.uk/ibit/
Its a fact that, n parallel processors is less efficient than one n-times-faster processor. And Sony does have some quite none standard C++ extensions compared to microsofts use of OpenMP.
Slashdot Mirror
They don't actually make any money. The managed to get a military contract last year. Prior to that their revenue was £70K
Vista was tolerable with SP1, albeit way to slow (I'm talking on a 2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo with 2GB memory).
XP, on the same machine, not surprisingly, was a *LOT* faster
7, on that machine, is between the two, but close enough to XP that I don't mind using it.
[citation needed]
Block text may not be the optimal layout for readability but it certainly better for use of space. Is the cost of reduced readability worth it for the space compression achieved? I personally highlight bits while I'm reading, it helps me focus and read quickly anyway. I suppose it will be useful in advertising...
http://techconf.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/09/19/t he-tech-conference-show-a-bit-about-second-life-eu rooscon-2006/
"yet there have been very few successful UK startups" I'd argue that there are plenty, I've applied for jobs at many. There may not be any on the scale of Google but there are certainly plenty of successful startups.
Thats a great plan - until microsoft decide to do the same thing with the Xbox360
Maybe you could make a program that automatically converts a program made in such a language into a chip design ? There are some that exist. For example: http://comjnl.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstr act/45/1/2
More like typical /. there's shed loads of peer reviewed papers!
I'd stay skeptical of such a claim until there is a peer-reviewed paper out. Perhaps you should look for one! A good place to start is here: http://www.virart.nott.ac.uk/ibit/
It doesnt matter if its clocked or not, you can implement synchronous or asynchronous components using the same technology.
The PS3 architecture is quite odd...
Its a fact that, n parallel processors is less efficient than one n-times-faster processor. And Sony does have some quite none standard C++ extensions compared to microsofts use of OpenMP.
Mod that man up!
RTFA .NET is a collection of things. .NET framework is a virtual machine. It runs compiled byte codes.
C# is a language which is part of .NET