You still haven't said what facts will prove to you that Russia interfered with the US election (this isn't just about the DNC hack)?
Why keep on about the anonymous sources? Why assume that the publicly available evidence is all there is? You and I can't see it, yet. When the various investigations have finished, we'll know more. Senator Burr (R, Ironside) has seen the evidence:
BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections? COMEY: None.
BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information? COMEY: No, no doubt.
BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files? COMEY: No.
BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities? COMEY: No doubt.
You come across as a Republican but you don't toe the party line. Why is that?
Comey and Rogers both told the Congressional Committee that there was Russian interference in the elections. The Republicans on the committee didn't argue.
You won't accept anonymous or 'biased' sources. What evidence would you accept?
I wanted a Bluetooth mouse a few months ago for just that reason but they were much less common than wireless mice which made me think perhaps they were inferior. The main criterion was a quiet mouse so I went wireless.
Why should these highly profitable corporations receive public money to do the right thing to protect themselves and the patients? If they won't do it voluntarily, the law should make them.
The prosecutors want to try people in groups which doesn't seem right:
there are still many more legal battles to come before these cases go to trial, such as whether evidence was lawfully collected and whether defendants should be tried in groups, as opposed to individual trials for each person.
The charges come in groups too - this seems to imply 1060 acts of property destruction:
The latest indictment... charged 212 defendants with at least eight counts: one count of inciting or urging others to riot, one count of conspiracy to riot, one count of engaging in rioting, and five counts of property destruction.
If a Packers fan kills a Bears fan because the Bears fan insulted the Packers then is that not just as much a "hate crime"?
No, it isn't. You'd be closer if a Packers fan killed a Bears fan because he hated Bears fans but the sports team someone supports isn't as fundamental as their skin colour, religion or sexual orientation (though I did notice Comey, Rogers and the guys on the committee proudly displaying their patriotism via their various football allegiances).
I've not heard the term plurality in the UK. An absolute majority is where a party gets more than half the total number of seats in the House of Commons and can thus govern by itself. This is what Theresa May had, gave up and has failed to regain. The total share of the vote is not relevant.
Wouldn't they consider joining a coalition as a special favour to their long-time pal, Jeremy Corbyn, specially as they have even more interest than the Unionists in a seamless border? Also, it would drive the Daily Mail crazy.
There you go again with your unfounded allegations "the fact that they are the parent organization of al Qaeda, Hamas and a number of other worldwide Jihadist organizations". Cite some sources please. I see what you're getting at but we're talking about the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood here.
That would be the democratic election where the opposition were either, dead, fled, banned, in hiding or being tortured in Egypt's prisons and where al-Sisi won 97% of the vote. Nothing says democratic free and fair elections more than 'winning' 97% of the vote. That brings Egypt up to the same democratic standards as Russia or Syria but it's not exactly Norway is it?
Maybe it's a mark of the CIA's extreme deviousness that they would create a plot in which their secrets were stolen and their agents betrayed just to frame the Chinese state but I doubt it. In any case, why isn't the reference to the original NYT story?
But surely there are so many comments here insisting that there is no Russian interference in US politics that we really must believe them.
And despite all the evidence you provide, where's the evidence? Unless you can show me video footage of Vladimir Putin signed into Facebook as Mrs Valerie Poutine of Poughkeepsie, New Mexico, a signed confession and DNA samples, we will have to conclude that these allegations are nothing but a desperate Western plot to discredit those democratically elected democrats in the Kremlin.
Slashdot Mirror
But then lots of people who enjoyed the first one won't realize it's a sequel.
You still haven't said what facts will prove to you that Russia interfered with the US election (this isn't just about the DNC hack)?
Why keep on about the anonymous sources? Why assume that the publicly available evidence is all there is? You and I can't see it, yet. When the various investigations have finished, we'll know more. Senator Burr (R, Ironside) has seen the evidence:
You come across as a Republican but you don't toe the party line. Why is that?
Comey and Rogers both told the Congressional Committee that there was Russian interference in the elections.
The Republicans on the committee didn't argue.
You won't accept anonymous or 'biased' sources. What evidence would you accept?
I wanted a Bluetooth mouse a few months ago for just that reason but they were much less common than wireless mice which made me think perhaps they were inferior. The main criterion was a quiet mouse so I went wireless.
Why should these highly profitable corporations receive public money to do the right thing to protect themselves and the patients? If they won't do it voluntarily, the law should make them.
If SpaceX are going to tout their "reasonable prices" they should adjust them slightly:
"starting at only $61,999,999.99 for its Falcon 9 and just $89,999,999.99 for the Falcon Heavy!"
The prosecutors want to try people in groups which doesn't seem right:
there are still many more legal battles to come before these cases go to trial, such as whether evidence was lawfully collected and whether defendants should be tried in groups, as opposed to individual trials for each person.
The charges come in groups too - this seems to imply 1060 acts of property destruction:
The latest indictment ... charged 212 defendants with at least eight counts: one count of inciting or urging others to riot, one count of conspiracy to riot, one count of engaging in rioting, and five counts of property destruction.
This article says Remicade costs the UK NHS on average £1500 ($1900) per patient per year.
"About 100,000 NHS patients are treated with it at a cost of approximately £150m per year."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/bus...
If a Packers fan kills a Bears fan because the Bears fan insulted the Packers then is that not just as much a "hate crime"?
No, it isn't. You'd be closer if a Packers fan killed a Bears fan because he hated Bears fans but the sports team someone supports isn't as fundamental as their skin colour, religion or sexual orientation (though I did notice Comey, Rogers and the guys on the committee proudly displaying their patriotism via their various football allegiances).
I've not heard the term plurality in the UK. An absolute majority is where a party gets more than half the total number of seats in the House of Commons and can thus govern by itself. This is what Theresa May had, gave up and has failed to regain. The total share of the vote is not relevant.
Wouldn't they consider joining a coalition as a special favour to their long-time pal, Jeremy Corbyn, specially as they have even more interest than the Unionists in a seamless border? Also, it would drive the Daily Mail crazy.
Weak and wobbly.
Well Dick, it seemed like B but I'm going to go for A.
Windows XP Computers Were Mostly Immune To WannaCry. 54 comments.
Google Chrome Bug Lets Sites Record Audio and Video Without a Visual Indicator. 36 comments.
Ask Slashdot: How Do You Choose a News Source? 247 comments.
Conch Shells Inspire Next Generation Helmets, Body Armor. 44 comments.
Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google Lobby Against Texas 'Bathroom' Bill. 509 comments.
Is there something on your mind, Slashdot?
All 260 of them. Some "flood".
They were two separate statements.
There you go again with your unfounded allegations "the fact that they are the parent organization of al Qaeda, Hamas and a number of other worldwide Jihadist organizations". Cite some sources please. I see what you're getting at but we're talking about the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood here.
That would be the democratic election where the opposition were either, dead, fled, banned, in hiding or being tortured in Egypt's prisons and where al-Sisi won 97% of the vote. Nothing says democratic free and fair elections more than 'winning' 97% of the vote. That brings Egypt up to the same democratic standards as Russia or Syria but it's not exactly Norway is it?
"Muslim Brotherhood (the parent organization of al Qaeda)"
That's not true at all. The Muslim Brotherhood were democratically elected in Egypt and removed by a military coup.
Have any of the official US agencies had a go at hacking these voting machines or is security left entirely to the manufacturer?
A major it is then.
Is that what they call virtual signalling?
Maybe it's a mark of the CIA's extreme deviousness that they would create a plot in which their secrets were stolen and their agents betrayed just to frame the Chinese state but I doubt it. In any case, why isn't the reference to the original NYT story?
But surely there are so many comments here insisting that there is no Russian interference in US politics that we really must believe them.
And despite all the evidence you provide, where's the evidence? Unless you can show me video footage of Vladimir Putin signed into Facebook as Mrs Valerie Poutine of Poughkeepsie, New Mexico, a signed confession and DNA samples, we will have to conclude that these allegations are nothing but a desperate Western plot to discredit those democratically elected democrats in the Kremlin.
"He's playing games in his backyard"
"Putin trying to incorporate land with Russophones."
The usual English phrase for that is "invading other countries".
Israel? No, the Israeli state's treatment of the Palestinians is despicable but it's paradise compared to Syria.
Where do you stand on vi versus emacs?