LMOL the general population was never asked if they would like their private property sold for billions of dollars with no compensation other than using Facebook. Try again Potsy...
The word is informative. http://catb.org/jargon/html/C/... That fact that you are too lazy to understand it does not change that. That's the job of a journalist, to educate people. They missed used the word. They need to do their fucking job an inform and educate.
The definition. Cracking is not a new word. Has always referred to what people in the media refer to as "hacking." Hacking was always considered good except for the lazy ass-hole in the media who couldn't be bothered to look things up....
"Hundreds of multi-ton liabilities—soaring faster than the speed of sound, miles above the surface of the earth—are operating on Windows-95." https://theoutline.com/post/42...
How exactly does Cambridge Analytica fit into this? Cambridge Analytica had nothing to do with identification/authentication issues. It had to do with an aspect of Facebook, sharing. Facebook allows you to share all your information, including contacts. So when you said yes to the survey, you agreed to share your information as well as the information about your friends. That's a process issue with Facebook not an issue with identification/authentication.
WTF are you talking about. Facebook can investigate what companies are doing with their data source. When the Obama administration did the same thing back in 2012, Facebook noticed and talked to them about it.
Yeah they've been saying the same thing about China's Currency Policy. The fact is, there's nothing anyone can do to force China to stop manipulating their currency. Same with trade practices. Other than go to the WTO if China is in violation of a trade agreement and then good luck.
Slashdot Mirror
LMOL you were suppose to release this back in 2016. Maybe you should call IBM, they can show you how to do it :)
Based on what jackass...it would be cheaper because they have the technology and the experience.
As long as Corporations have full transparency, I'm game. No hiding behind, trade secrets.
LMOL the general population was never asked if they would like their private property sold for billions of dollars with no compensation other than using Facebook. Try again Potsy...
The word is informative. http://catb.org/jargon/html/C/... That fact that you are too lazy to understand it does not change that. That's the job of a journalist, to educate people. They missed used the word. They need to do their fucking job an inform and educate.
The definition. Cracking is not a new word. Has always referred to what people in the media refer to as "hacking." Hacking was always considered good except for the lazy ass-hole in the media who couldn't be bothered to look things up....
Thank you! The word already existed. Journalists were too lazy and did not want to educate the public....
"The evidence of close ties and cooperation between Kaspersky Lab and the Kremlin is overwhelming..."
Cite a law or fuck off. Useless war mongering Senator....
RTFA:
"Hundreds of multi-ton liabilities—soaring faster than the speed of sound, miles above the surface of the earth—are operating on Windows-95." https://theoutline.com/post/42...
It's a frivolous lawsuit and will get tossed. You're suppose to open the garage door before starting your car...
Ah guilty until proven innocent...
THANK YOU! You want to stop this behavior then pass some god dam laws! Don't pretend this is a problem now when this has been Facebook SOP.
How the fuck do you think they make money by NOT charging for their product!!!
It shows Facebook doing business as usual. They knew about this in 2012 and did not care.
Not the exception. Who wrote this fucking article.
"Every country's spy agencies think they're the good guys."
"economically and socially embrace the West's principals."
What do you mean, they embraced oligarchy like we did...
You just made the argument against EVERY fucking internet enabled device.
Congratulations.
Gosh how was society able to do that for centuries before these wonder device....
Because he looks like a liar and more concerned with image than the investigation. By all mean claim the NTSB isn't concerned about safety *eye roll*
Large Corporations do.
Uber loses appeal in UK employment case / Company must treat its drivers as ‘workers’, tribunal rules https://www.ft.com/content/84d...
Which means they are not contractors but employees.
How exactly does Cambridge Analytica fit into this? Cambridge Analytica had nothing to do with identification/authentication issues. It had to do with an aspect of Facebook, sharing. Facebook allows you to share all your information, including contacts. So when you said yes to the survey, you agreed to share your information as well as the information about your friends. That's a process issue with Facebook not an issue with identification/authentication.
WTF are you talking about. Facebook can investigate what companies are doing with their data source. When the Obama administration did the same thing back in 2012, Facebook noticed and talked to them about it.
Take your head out of your ass.
Yeah they've been saying the same thing about China's Currency Policy. The fact is, there's nothing anyone can do to force China to stop manipulating their currency. Same with trade practices. Other than go to the WTO if China is in violation of a trade agreement and then good luck.
Tariffs do work, ask Japan.