Your argument is based on the ASSUMPTION that these people will start businesses. Most of these people will work for existing corporations, not start their own businesses. Thus they will be reducing the number of jobs not increasing them.
The other obvious problem; THEY'RE VISAS! Once the visa expires they have to leave the country.
#3 is basically why we have shit sounding music and why Niel Young is advocating for better sounding music. The fact that there are people posting comments advocating for this shit is simply astounding. But then it's not surprising since they don't have clue how hearing works.
You'd have more credibility not posting as anonymous....as it is digital music does not capture the full audio range. There is a difference that can clearly be heard between vinyl and cd pressings.
Not if you drink more. That's the problem. As research has pointed out, you are not satiated with HFCS, you are with sugar. People drink alot less soda if it uses sugar as a sweetener.
The other problem is HFCS is EVERYWHERE. It's in salad dressing for christs sake.
" HFCS is almost identical to sucrose metabolically."
No it is not. HFCS is not metabolized by the body the same way sugar is. HFCS is addictive, people eat more of it to get satiated. People eat less if the sweetner is sugar. The other kicker is HFCS is a food source for some cancers.
Seriously we would be a lot better off switching back to sugar. Decades of data have shown why HFCS is worse than sugar.
What the fuck do you mean by solid beer? You mean mass produced swill, like Bud, yeah it's in a can. But lots of beer that is readily available in you local supermarket is not available in can.
So then you support banning high fructose corn syrup since that is the major cause of obesity do in part because it is addictive....or are you one of those head in the sand crowd....
According to whom? People who didn't like the conclusions? The study was published in a peer reviewed journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology http://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology, go read the article than come back and post something intelligent.
Except it rearranges them based on usage - very bad idea - and you can't expand the start menu the way you could in XP or even just drag it out so you can actually read the titles of programs...
Slashdot Mirror
Your argument is based on the ASSUMPTION that these people will start businesses. Most of these people will work for existing corporations, not start their own businesses. Thus they will be reducing the number of jobs not increasing them.
The other obvious problem; THEY'RE VISAS! Once the visa expires they have to leave the country.
Moron.
Better hurry up you'll be late for your clan meeting....
And yet you ignored this line: "One vinyl record may sound better than its equivalent CD for extremely specific reasons."
Yeah that's why DJs prefer vinyl *eye roll*
You just said that people's speakers are shit....which is it zippy?
#3 is basically why we have shit sounding music and why Niel Young is advocating for better sounding music. The fact that there are people posting comments advocating for this shit is simply astounding. But then it's not surprising since they don't have clue how hearing works.
You'd have more credibility not posting as anonymous....as it is digital music does not capture the full audio range. There is a difference that can clearly be heard between vinyl and cd pressings.
Not if you drink more. That's the problem. As research has pointed out, you are not satiated with HFCS, you are with sugar. People drink alot less soda if it uses sugar as a sweetener.
The other problem is HFCS is EVERYWHERE. It's in salad dressing for christs sake.
You mean the media bullshit that says HFCS is safe.
" HFCS is almost identical to sucrose metabolically."
No it is not. HFCS is not metabolized by the body the same way sugar is. HFCS is addictive, people eat more of it to get satiated. People eat less if the sweetner is sugar. The other kicker is HFCS is a food source for some cancers.
Seriously we would be a lot better off switching back to sugar. Decades of data have shown why HFCS is worse than sugar.
The one that doesn't have the widget is Extra Stout.
What the fuck do you mean by solid beer? You mean mass produced swill, like Bud, yeah it's in a can. But lots of beer that is readily available in you local supermarket is not available in can.
What insane planet are you from? Beer does not taste better in a can. Any beer drinking person will tell you that bottle is better.
Like you I guess...
So then you support banning high fructose corn syrup since that is the major cause of obesity do in part because it is addictive....or are you one of those head in the sand crowd....
According to whom? People who didn't like the conclusions? The study was published in a peer reviewed journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology http://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology, go read the article than come back and post something intelligent.
And 90-day feeding trials that form the basis of GM crop approvals are long enough????
Yeah 'cuz organic farms are run like 19th century farms *eye roll*
God if really want minimal go back to DOS.....
Except it rearranges them based on usage - very bad idea - and you can't expand the start menu the way you could in XP or even just drag it out so you can actually read the titles of programs...
You can stop trolling.
Really Potsy....
If you own stock in Apple, you would be.
Yeah because Verizon doesn't lock down their Android phones....oh wait....
2 million sold in 24 hours is very impressive. If you don't understand that, you need to talk to an market analyst.
Did that make you feel better. Do you feel like a big boy now. How about you hop over to Facebook and rag about people's posts.....