Slashdot Mirror


User: oh_my_080980980

oh_my_080980980's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,592
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,592

  1. Re:Verizon is correct on Verizon Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality Rules · · Score: 1

    INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

    Seriously, you need to stop reading tea party propaganda. Do some research, read the appropriate laws, how they are applied, the relevant court decisions and you will understand.

  2. Re:Verizon is correct on Verizon Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality Rules · · Score: 1

    Interstate Commerce or are you intentionally dumb.

  3. Re:Verizon is correct on Verizon Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality Rules · · Score: 0

    Listen douche bag, do some research before posting your little conspiracy theories.

    The FCC has the right to regulate communication providers, that includes cable companies not just telecom companies.

    These so called cables are not private. Cables run through people's property. As such they no longer private. More importantly, I do not receive any payment for the use of my land.

    Cable companies receive special treatment by municipal government to operate as a monopoly and they receive tax payer funds.

    So get a fucking clue!

  4. Re:Of course they did on Verizon Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality Rules · · Score: 1

    Verizon is that you?

  5. Re:Of course they did on Verizon Sues FCC Over Net Neutrality Rules · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what happened to tort reform?

    Oh that's right, it's a CORPORATION that's suing, not an PERSON.

    Maybe we need to get the Supreme Court to declare that people are corporations, that way we can have the same rights.

  6. NO ONE LISTENS TO FLORIAN MUELLER on Are Google's Patents Too Weak To Protect Android? · · Score: 1

    His 15 minutes of fame are over. Sadly he has not realized this.

  7. Re:What a great way to die on Motorola Sticks To Guns On Locking Down Android · · Score: 1

    But wait Droid is open.......suckers.

  8. Re:Playboy isn't Porn on The iPad Will Get Playboy In March · · Score: 1

    *faint*

  9. Re:Playboy isn't Porn on The iPad Will Get Playboy In March · · Score: 1

    Hasn't changed. Same photo layouts like in the '50s. Playboy is of the opinion that nothing resides below the female waste.

  10. Re:Playboy isn't Porn on The iPad Will Get Playboy In March · · Score: 1

    Dude, Playboy doesn't show vag. Unless you show vag, you do not have porn. I won't go into penetration - they very definition of porn.

  11. Re:I only want to subscribe.... on The iPad Will Get Playboy In March · · Score: 1

    Gravity's Rainbow..........

  12. Re:I only want to subscribe.... on The iPad Will Get Playboy In March · · Score: 1

    slumming....

  13. Re:My psychic prediction on Open Source More Expensive Says MS Report · · Score: 1

    "But companies that use such programs spend more on such things as learning to use them and making them work with other software."

    Like buying 3rd party software to get the functionality that isn't in the Microsoft product you bought.

  14. Re:Stop trying to resolve them! on Cosmological Constant Not Fine Tuned For Life · · Score: 1

    Well, God's first name. It's Steve.

  15. Re:Any need for this? on Cosmological Constant Not Fine Tuned For Life · · Score: 1

    No.

  16. Re:A Few Logical Problems on The Fall of Wintel and the Rise of Armdroid · · Score: 0

    "Even some granny that mainly just surfs the web can find a tablet limiting."

    Which are?

    Unless you can back up your assertion with facts you are just masturbating.

    Moron.

  17. Re:A Few Logical Problems on The Fall of Wintel and the Rise of Armdroid · · Score: 0

    How vary window centric of you.

    Tablets are tablets and PCs are PCs. As soon as you figure that out you'll begin to understand where this is headed.

    Until then enjoy your Edsel.

  18. Re:A Few Logical Problems on The Fall of Wintel and the Rise of Armdroid · · Score: -1, Troll

    Wow sit back and wait....nice approach to running a business, not!

    You really don't get it do you. You aren't paying attention to Microsoft's "cloud" commercials or Apple's iPad commercials. Each one tells you where the mobile market is going and what the capabilities are.

    Hate to break it to you morons but most computer users do not need computers to do their work. Unless your are a programmer, which is a tiny tiny population, you don't need a computer.

    Oh and people don't need a bloated word processor to write a document. Microsoft wants you to think you need a fat bloated word processor like Word but again 99% of users don't need a fat bloated word processor. So something slimmed down that can run on a tablet would be fine.

    But then why do you think tablet hardware is not powerful?

    Time to do some research and stop speaking out of your ass.

  19. Re:The Tucson Shooter... on New Study Links Video Games and Mental Problems · · Score: 2

    Right because everyone on slashdot is a mental health expert.

    You believe what you want to believe.

  20. Re:The Tucson Shooter... on New Study Links Video Games and Mental Problems · · Score: 2

    Same as the study that "Finds Video Games Are Not Bad for Kids."

    You are just cherry picking the studies you want to believe are true.

  21. Re:Specimen handling protocols on 34,000-Year-Old Organisms Found Buried Alive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fact that they were trapped in salt would be the big clue.

  22. Re:Yes they are feasible. on Are 10-11 Hour Programming Days Feasible? · · Score: 1

    So basically you work for food. How novel.

    From a Six sigma prospective, this a sure fire way to ruin your work force and create shoddy products.

    If you need to have people work 12 hour days then you need to hire extra help. It's that simple.

    Have fun being a slave.

  23. Re:Google is playing a dangerous game on Google vs. Bing — a Quasi-Empirical Study · · Score: 2

    I see your reality distortion field working at 100%.

    First off the Nintendo WII has torn the Xbox and the PS3 a new one. XBox has done anything to the PS3. It's a strong gaming platform but by no means has it destroyed Sony. But out of nowhere Nintendo comes and kicks both Microsoft's and Sony's ass.

    Second, You have no proof for Windows 8. So no one knows if Windows 8 will be good or bad. Based on Vista -> Windows 7, I am not holding my breath.

    Third, you haven't a freakin' clue why iOS is sucessful. iOS is not the same as OS X. The unified product base is why the Windows tablet does not work. You need a specialized OS to run a tablet. Microsoft Windows 7 is not that.

    Microsoft's stock is trading around $30/share. Apple's stock is trading over $300/share. 7 years ago Apple's stock was trading at $7/share. Microsoft's stock was roughly the same price today.

    In short there has been no growth.

  24. Re:Bing is great for non-techies on Google vs. Bing — a Quasi-Empirical Study · · Score: 1

    Yeah that's what I want Microsoft making decisions for me...*roll eyes*

  25. Re:Too late. on Verizon Finally Unveils Apple iPhone · · Score: 1

    Yeah, whatever lets you sleep at night.

    But not for the millions of Verizon subscribers that have been waiting for the iPhone. Not too mention for the millions of Sprint and T-Mobile customers who want the phone too.