Slashdot Mirror


User: oh_my_080980980

oh_my_080980980's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,592
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,592

  1. Re:Hey GM, how about that EV1? on Tesla Tops GM by Market Value as Investors See Musk as Future (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    LMOL, MARKET VALUATION not profits.

    FTA: "Even if Tesla turns a profit, they will eventually have to make enough to justify this valuation."

    GM posts $9.43B in net profits for 2016 http://www.detroitnews.com/sto...

    Tesla NET Income for 2016, $674.9M https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    Yeah GM is real worried....

  2. Re:Right.... on Why More Tech Companies Are Hiring People Without Degrees (fastcompany.com) · · Score: 1

    Shhh....old people are soylent green...

  3. Re:Engineering on Why More Tech Companies Are Hiring People Without Degrees (fastcompany.com) · · Score: 1

    I think that's the point. They're focusing on code monkeys.

  4. Re:I think someone without a degree wrote that sum on Why More Tech Companies Are Hiring People Without Degrees (fastcompany.com) · · Score: 1

    Look up Group Think.

  5. Re:It's the VIDEO STREAMING folks whom want NN on Roku Has Hired a Team of Lobbyists As it Gears Up For a Net Neutrality Fight (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    Not even close Potsy. Troll somewhere else.

  6. Re:Some forms of net neutrality make sense; some d on Roku Has Hired a Team of Lobbyists As it Gears Up For a Net Neutrality Fight (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    There is no demand on infrastructure. Stop the trolling.

  7. Hey ass-hole, people do not have fucking choices. If we had fucking choices then that would mean we have competition. We don't. Fuck off.

  8. Re:Generic Party doesn't apply to all. on Roku Has Hired a Team of Lobbyists As it Gears Up For a Net Neutrality Fight (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    You do realize Marsha Blackburn is a Republican.

  9. Re:Generic Party doesn't apply to all. on Roku Has Hired a Team of Lobbyists As it Gears Up For a Net Neutrality Fight (recode.net) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck off ass-hole. Hate to break it to fuck nuts but PEOPLE ARE PAYING ACCESS COMING AND GOING. Amazon pays for on-line access and user pay for on-line access. The only ones whining or the damn ISPs because they feel they should be able to double dip and charger Amazon because their content is traveling through their tubs. Well ass-hole it is being paid for by the fucking user.

    And no it's not the fucking backbone that is asking for more money. It's Verizon, AT&T and Comcast.

    Fuck off and die.

  10. Re:Obama Era Incumbent Support on Roku Has Hired a Team of Lobbyists As it Gears Up For a Net Neutrality Fight (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    Verizon is that you.

  11. Re:and that would be a bad thing... because? on We're Creating a Perfect Storm of Unprecedented Global Warming (popsci.com) · · Score: 1

    Interesting because it doesn't stop corporations from using government to have a long-term positive impact on the economy...

  12. Re:Not really that surprised. on ESPN Has Seen the Future of TV and They're Not Really Into It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 0

    Seriously? The NFL is already doing that. They're streaming the London games. So yes they have thought about the future.

    It seems like a bunch of you morons have failed to consider programming costs. Why do you think people are cutting the cord? It's about cost. What drives cost? Programming. So why do you think that Netflix and Amazon will beat Cable, when programming costs are the same. Good quality programming costs money. Period. Why do you think Amazon investors were nervous when Amazon was going to increase the number of original programs they make? Cost!

    Netflix and Amazon do not have a solution for the cost to make programs. They too will run into revenue issues. They have to start charging more and more and/or offer less and less. Soon you will back where you were but this time, you'll be dumping Amazon instead of Cable TV.

    Morons.

  13. Re:They should have seen this coming... on ESPN Has Seen the Future of TV and They're Not Really Into It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Care to elaborate. I'm sure they would like to know how they could make lots of money when other digital sources fail to.

    You obviously failed to take into consideration the COST OF PROGRAMMING. Contracts to carry sports programming are very expensive.

    Think before you post.

  14. Re:We've seen this coming... on ESPN Has Seen the Future of TV and They're Not Really Into It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    You really don't have a fucking clue do you.

    THERE'S NO MONEY IN ON-LINE VIEWERSHIP!

    Do you have any fucking clue how much sports programming costs? Monday Night football costs ESPN $1.5 BILLIONS dollars per year! That's just Monday Night football. Then there's NBA, MLB, other professional and college sports.

    So you need a pretty big revenue stream. Revenue from on-line viewers doesn't come anywhere close to cable viewers. Not to mention you can't charge a premium for on-line Ads.

    The problem Potsy, is one of revenue and cost.

  15. ...would they make if YouTube did not allow the music to be posted in the first place *gasp*....I guess the studies authors NEVER considered that. Just saw millions of hits and said "X number of dollars time millions of hits equals big money"

  16. Perhaps you want to tell Tim Cook that. Seems large corporations like to get free stuff...

  17. How about the science museum? on Ivanka Trump To Take Coding Class With 5-Year-Old Daughter (hollywoodlife.com) · · Score: 1

    You know doing something real. Maybe help your child develop an interest in science which may lead to a career in science or engineering and not simple being a code monkey.

  18. Re:Missing the point on Ivanka Trump To Take Coding Class With 5-Year-Old Daughter (hollywoodlife.com) · · Score: 1

    Because you have blinders on and are covering your ears. This is making something a requirement and forcing EVERYONE to take it. It is not providing the opportunity. It's forcing people to do it.

  19. Re:Missing the point on Ivanka Trump To Take Coding Class With 5-Year-Old Daughter (hollywoodlife.com) · · Score: 1

    Put aside your trolling for a moment and understand the difference. One was a CHOICE, the other was FORCEFULLY FORCED DOWN YOUR THROAT. Can you figure out which one. You'll get cookie when you do.

  20. And this is news how? on A Lawsuit Over Costco Golf Balls Shows Why We Can't Have Nice Things For Cheap (qz.com) · · Score: 1

    Been going on in the tech industry for decades.

  21. Re:Can you say 20+ years out? on Elon Musk Launches Neuralink To Connect Brains With Computers (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1

    You do realize this is bullshit. Total snake oil. It is not the same as a prosthetic device.

    So please just fuck off and let real people do real science without all this bullshit.

  22. Re:Easiest for a newbie -- to do what? on Ask Slashdot: What's The Easiest Linux Distro For A Newbie? · · Score: 1

    Exactly! It's not a serious question. When you claim to be a lurker and yet say "without constant under-the-hood tweaking (ala early Windows flavors, 3.1, 95/98)" that says you are not serious and you weren't a lurker. Seriously Linux had better driver support than Windows 7!

    If you don't know what you want from Linux, no one can help you.

  23. Re:Again like I said! on Senate Votes To Kill FCC's Broadband Privacy Rules (pcworld.com) · · Score: 1

    Where the fuck have you been? The democratic party has been pro corporate American since Clinton! Actually even before.

  24. Re:Want good Internet? Move to a city. on 'Dig Once' Bill Could Bring Fiber Internet To Much of the US (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 1

    I guess you think the interstate highway was a bad idea..

  25. Re:Yeah, maybe on 'Dig Once' Bill Could Bring Fiber Internet To Much of the US (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 1

    You really are a moron aren't you...