FTA: "tech executives argue that local public schools are failing to teach students valuable computer skills."
Does this mean if *high schools* (because we aren't talking about universities) picked up the slack and started to churn out code monkeys, these tech companies would stop lobbying for more H1B Visas? Because if they don't stop lobbying it just means they are selling these kids a bill of goods since their jobs are going to be replaced by H1B Visas holders. So Google, you can piss off.
...actually securing transactions and the databases that house this information. Nobody gives a flying fuck about home automation, consumer health and fitness wearables, which is what this article is talking about. The problem Target faced was their transaction database was hacked. It wasn't about some lame internet consumer device.
LMOL...ok Potsy. If the Ukraine wants to join NATO they can. If the Ukraine wants to join the EU, they can. Ukraine is it's own country and can make it's own decisions. Putin can just suck it.
Really? Google is a large corporation with diverse interests. Google has become a conglomeration, like GE. Therefore restructuring their corporate structure allows for a better accounting and managing of it's different business divisions. Not really hard to understand.
"Further analysis showed that many of the SDKs were vulnerable due to weak code generated by SWIG, an interoperability tool that connects C/C++ with variety of languages, when fed with some bad configuration given by the developer." https://www.usenix.org/confere...
Try again. The study existed before Aisen arrived it did not originate with him. Regardless it is moot point. The university owns the research and the grant. If Aisen wants to leave, he has to settle that with UCSD, that's a contract dispute but his research stays behind.
[disclosure: I've applied for and received an NIH grant]
That's not how academic research works. The university owns it. Period. That's not to say the PI couldn't carry on the research at another institution, he can, but he can't take any of the research or equipment. That stays with the university. He would have to rely what he published.
You need to read, it's the institution. The PI files for the grant. Nothing more. As it clearly states it is up to the institution to allow the grant to transfer. If they don't, the NIH can terminate the grant if they feel the project can't continue under new leadership. Notice the grant does not follow the PI nor does the NIH award it to the original PI. This clearly means the grant is awarded to the institution.
If true, he has a beef with UCSD and that's a contract dispute with UCSD **but** it does not give him ownership over the research and equipment. So no dice.
No one's hiding it but ownership is the issue. UC San Diego started the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study and then USC poached UC San Dieg's principle investigator. If this was happening in corporate sector Dr. Paul Aisen would be hit with huge lawsuits. He should pray to his lucky stars that this is just an academic hissy fit.
The football team would be UCLA Bruins since they are part of the University of California system. They both have baseball and water polo teams, among other sports.
Slashdot Mirror
Before or after they were retro-actively declared classified.....
FTA: "tech executives argue that local public schools are failing to teach students valuable computer skills."
Does this mean if *high schools* (because we aren't talking about universities) picked up the slack and started to churn out code monkeys, these tech companies would stop lobbying for more H1B Visas? Because if they don't stop lobbying it just means they are selling these kids a bill of goods since their jobs are going to be replaced by H1B Visas holders. So Google, you can piss off.
...actually securing transactions and the databases that house this information. Nobody gives a flying fuck about home automation, consumer health and fitness wearables, which is what this article is talking about. The problem Target faced was their transaction database was hacked. It wasn't about some lame internet consumer device.
Denile is not just a river in Egypt....
LMOL...ok Potsy. If the Ukraine wants to join NATO they can. If the Ukraine wants to join the EU, they can. Ukraine is it's own country and can make it's own decisions. Putin can just suck it.
Putin is that you...
Right and the Russian army that's involved in this action isn't using Russian equipment.....
LMOL, ummm no thanks for playing. Nobody trusts Putin.
He said the same thing you did, and his comment is a "jeer?" Wow.....
*Shhh* people around here don't read SEC filings. It gets in the way of their head in their asses pontifications...
Really? Google is a large corporation with diverse interests. Google has become a conglomeration, like GE. Therefore restructuring their corporate structure allows for a better accounting and managing of it's different business divisions. Not really hard to understand.
You douche bag, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
Larry Page (CEO)
Sergey Brin (President)
Eric Schmidt (Chairman)
Ruth Porat (CFO)
They become like GE a conglomeration. Fairly standard with corporations with diverse interests.
Doesn't change the judgement. Alphabet would still face the sanction. You can't restructure your way out of a lawsuit.
According to the article:
"Further analysis showed that many of the SDKs were vulnerable due to weak code generated by SWIG, an interoperability tool that connects C/C++ with variety of languages, when fed with some bad configuration given by the developer." https://www.usenix.org/confere...
So it doesn't sound like Java.
"Foxconn has 12 factories in nine Chinese cities—more than in any other country." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... So your point was?
Listen Zippy, that's not how it works. You should stop before you look more like an ass.
Try again. The study existed before Aisen arrived it did not originate with him. Regardless it is moot point. The university owns the research and the grant. If Aisen wants to leave, he has to settle that with UCSD, that's a contract dispute but his research stays behind.
[disclosure: I've applied for and received an NIH grant]
That's not how academic research works. The university owns it. Period. That's not to say the PI couldn't carry on the research at another institution, he can, but he can't take any of the research or equipment. That stays with the university. He would have to rely what he published.
Resend it some more - grants are tied to the institution not the PI. Notice the institution has to allow the grant to follow the PI.
You need to read, it's the institution. The PI files for the grant. Nothing more. As it clearly states it is up to the institution to allow the grant to transfer. If they don't, the NIH can terminate the grant if they feel the project can't continue under new leadership. Notice the grant does not follow the PI nor does the NIH award it to the original PI. This clearly means the grant is awarded to the institution.
If true, he has a beef with UCSD and that's a contract dispute with UCSD **but** it does not give him ownership over the research and equipment. So no dice.
Which means little. The University owns the research, the labs and the equipment. Dr. Aisen own's his reputation, nothing more.
No one's hiding it but ownership is the issue. UC San Diego started the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study and then USC poached UC San Dieg's principle investigator. If this was happening in corporate sector Dr. Paul Aisen would be hit with huge lawsuits. He should pray to his lucky stars that this is just an academic hissy fit.
The football team would be UCLA Bruins since they are part of the University of California system. They both have baseball and water polo teams, among other sports.