What fucking local ISP? Verizon or Time Warner. Those are the choices. The change would allow Google to compete. Google has asked for this re-classification. Read moron read.
The other article was an op-ed piece written by Grover G. Norquist, not news article written by a reporter. It was opinion. Nothing more and not worth the bother. Only Grover G. Norquist could argue competition will lead to higher costs.
It's a separate service. You don't need Dish. "It will include television programming and sports events from Walt Disney's ABC, ESPN and Maker Studios, Time Warner's TNT, CNN, TBS, Cartoon Network and Adult Swim, and Food Network, HGTV and Travel Channel."
http://boxingdispatch.com/sci-...
That's a pretty good deal since you are being raped on programming costs from cable or fios.
That people take this article as gospel and don't question it's premise. When you are comparing the peer review process to the NBA, you have a problem.
You are a fucking moron. Seriously your comment deserves nothing more than derision if you think for a moment researchers need an RSS reader for research topics.
Yeah because people claiming the world is warming because of man's influence haven't been laughed at....seriously pull the stick out of your ass.
" Instead, I'll consider the matter when the people who say it's a problem act like it's a problem"
You mean like scientists....how's this the military considered global warming an issue and are working on plans to account for it. Hedge Funds and investors consider global warming an issue and are developing investment strategies to account for it. Only jackasses such as yourself think it's not happening and that you don't have to do anything.
As opposed to pro coal and pro oil proponents *eye roll* all the climate scientists are saying is the climate is warming because of our use of fossil fuels and the need to stop using them and find alternatives. Policy is left up to the politicians. However many politicians deny the climate is warming and refuse to do anything about it.
The straw man is entirely on the side of the pro-petroleum advocates.
Funny, I remember when people used to read thr article instead of pulling something out of their ass and posting it.
FTA: "Skepticism is all about critical examination, evidence-based scientific inquiry, and the use of reason in examining controversial claims. Those who flatly deny the results of climate science do not partake in any of the above. "
"Everything a human does is limited by our biology, there is a limit to how quickly we can be trained, with more advanced subjects taking ever longer to understand.
There is a limit to how much information we store for processing, and a limit to how quickly more information can be fed in.
The beauty of an AI system is the system can be designed from the ground up avoid the restrictions we have. Even if it were true that human's couldn't create something smarter than us, we certainly can create something which matches our intelligence but without the hardware restrictions we have ourselves."
People's ignorance is simply astounding. Nothing that you have said above is correct and you have demonstrated a profound lack of understanding of computers and human physiology. Let me make this very simply for you. Computers have severe limitations in their processing ability. The most simplest of task that a child can perform a computer fails. The simple fact is human beings have no limitations inherent to their biology. Our biology can change, adapt and evolve. This has been demonstrated over millennium. Computers do not have this capability. Computers are severely limited by their physical makeup and nothing can surmount that. There's a limitation of number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit. That's a physical fact that cannot be circumvented. The smaller these circuits become the more unstable they become; look up electron tunneling. So there is a brick wall when it comes to computing, not so with people.
Nobody uses a frickin' buzz word to describe their academic goals. STEM means nothing, it's a meaningless term. Do you mean engineering: something like Electrical Engineering or perhaps Chemical Engineering? Do you mean science: Physics, Biology, Chemistry? Or did you mean Computer Science?
When you say "STEM-related (preferably within the space industry" it clearly underscores that you are not seriously asking a question.
Slashdot Mirror
Wow a Putin apologist. Who knew he had so many fans...
The same is true of masturbation, but it doesn't stop you from doing it.
That Scientologists are nut jobs, which was obvious.
Wow a Scientology apologist
What fucking local ISP? Verizon or Time Warner. Those are the choices. The change would allow Google to compete. Google has asked for this re-classification. Read moron read.
This paid shill announcement brought to by Verizon.
Yo ass-hat Google is requesting the classification. They see it as a good thing.
The other article was an op-ed piece written by Grover G. Norquist, not news article written by a reporter. It was opinion. Nothing more and not worth the bother. Only Grover G. Norquist could argue competition will lead to higher costs.
It's a separate service. You don't need Dish. "It will include television programming and sports events from Walt Disney's ABC, ESPN and Maker Studios, Time Warner's TNT, CNN, TBS, Cartoon Network and Adult Swim, and Food Network, HGTV and Travel Channel." http://boxingdispatch.com/sci-...
That's a pretty good deal since you are being raped on programming costs from cable or fios.
Does anybody read anymore. No broadcast TV. Deals with ESPN, CNN and other networks. Jesus get off your fucking ass and read people.
Yo jackass, this isn't broadcast. It doesn't carry broadcast TV. Way to read the article.
LMOL yeah o.k. so when was the last time you exercised unlawful search and seizure...
Because someone *isn't* going to corneal their weapon....
You mean like gay marriage and abortion. Yeah those are being tackled like adults *eye roll*
"Kids get "educated" despite the public schools, not because of them."
Because that statement has been been proven, vetted, or has any evidence to support it.
No not all public schools perform poorly; in rich, suburban areas they do very well.
That people take this article as gospel and don't question it's premise. When you are comparing the peer review process to the NBA, you have a problem.
"Rather than using an RSS reader,"
You are a fucking moron. Seriously your comment deserves nothing more than derision if you think for a moment researchers need an RSS reader for research topics.
Wow. Just, wow.
Host? You mean sell. This is a retailer selling someone's works only to stop when some moron complained about the punctuation.
LMOL....
Yeah because people claiming the world is warming because of man's influence haven't been laughed at....seriously pull the stick out of your ass.
" Instead, I'll consider the matter when the people who say it's a problem act like it's a problem"
You mean like scientists....how's this the military considered global warming an issue and are working on plans to account for it. Hedge Funds and investors consider global warming an issue and are developing investment strategies to account for it. Only jackasses such as yourself think it's not happening and that you don't have to do anything.
Let me guess, you don't vaccinated either.
As opposed to pro coal and pro oil proponents *eye roll* all the climate scientists are saying is the climate is warming because of our use of fossil fuels and the need to stop using them and find alternatives. Policy is left up to the politicians. However many politicians deny the climate is warming and refuse to do anything about it.
The straw man is entirely on the side of the pro-petroleum advocates.
So you're clearly in the denier camp.
Funny, I remember when people used to read thr article instead of pulling something out of their ass and posting it.
FTA: "Skepticism is all about critical examination, evidence-based scientific inquiry, and the use of reason in examining controversial claims. Those who flatly deny the results of climate science do not partake in any of the above. "
"Everything a human does is limited by our biology, there is a limit to how quickly we can be trained, with more advanced subjects taking ever longer to understand.
There is a limit to how much information we store for processing, and a limit to how quickly more information can be fed in.
The beauty of an AI system is the system can be designed from the ground up avoid the restrictions we have. Even if it were true that human's couldn't create something smarter than us, we certainly can create something which matches our intelligence but without the hardware restrictions we have ourselves."
People's ignorance is simply astounding. Nothing that you have said above is correct and you have demonstrated a profound lack of understanding of computers and human physiology. Let me make this very simply for you. Computers have severe limitations in their processing ability. The most simplest of task that a child can perform a computer fails. The simple fact is human beings have no limitations inherent to their biology. Our biology can change, adapt and evolve. This has been demonstrated over millennium. Computers do not have this capability. Computers are severely limited by their physical makeup and nothing can surmount that. There's a limitation of number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit. That's a physical fact that cannot be circumvented. The smaller these circuits become the more unstable they become; look up electron tunneling. So there is a brick wall when it comes to computing, not so with people.
Nobody uses a frickin' buzz word to describe their academic goals. STEM means nothing, it's a meaningless term. Do you mean engineering: something like Electrical Engineering or perhaps Chemical Engineering? Do you mean science: Physics, Biology, Chemistry? Or did you mean Computer Science?
When you say "STEM-related (preferably within the space industry" it clearly underscores that you are not seriously asking a question.
How the hell did this get past the editors.