Slashdot Mirror


Russia Says Drivers Must Not Have "Sex Disorders" To Get License

mrspoonsi writes Russia has listed transsexual and transgender people among those who will no longer qualify for driving licenses. Fetishism, exhibitionism and voyeurism are also included as "mental disorders" now barring people from driving. The government says it is tightening medical controls for drivers because Russia has too many road accidents. "Pathological" gambling and compulsive stealing are also on the list. Russian psychiatrists and human rights lawyers have condemned the move. The announcement follows international complaints about Russian harassment of gay-rights activists.

412 comments

  1. Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Putin don't drive!

    1. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well he lives in a country that is on the Asian continent, so it makes sense.

    2. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      BTW here's how they drive in Russia:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    3. Re:Good thing... by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Funny

      I fully support Russia's efforts to establish themselves as the force of Evil to be opposed in this New Cold War.

      It is great for the US economy.

    4. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Recently a romanian friend pointed out that the word "putin" in romanian means "little". I guess that explains a lot about Lord Putin's behaviour. Overcompensating? :)

    5. Re:Good thing... by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      He is not very tall, so not a problem. BTW, "putin" in bulgarian sounds funny, too. But not so innocent.

    6. Re:Good thing... by sponse · · Score: 1

      Well, in Spanish, "putin" means: little "puto".
      "putito" is the most common form, but "putin" and "putico" are also valid. Here you got the definition of "puto": http://www.wordreference.com/e...

    7. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, competition is great - it challenges to be better. Or in this case, more evil. Go Amerikkka!

    8. Re:Good thing... by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that made my day...



      Thank you.

    9. Re:Good thing... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Pooting is close enough. In English his name means 'farting'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg, clearly not that many engineers amongst them.

      It's still breaking the spirit of the two-lane-road idea and less safe than simply driving forwards on the wrong side.

    11. Re:Good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Good thing... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Putka means cunt.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will this include the typical Russian Elite who purchases small girls for sex?

    1. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never. Rules are for the little people. Much like the "free market", "competition", and "taking risks". That kind of nonsense is for you and me.

      For them, it's quite another story!

    2. Re:Pedophiles by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they don't drive, they have drivers - and escorts. and not just the escorts of the call girl variety, but like, 3 G mercs. because, you know, it's Russia. Plenty of the Russian elite emigrate just to feel safe.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Pedophiles by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      they don't drive, they have drivers - and escorts. and not just the escorts of the call girl variety, but like, 3 G mercs. because, you know, it's Russia. Plenty of the Russian elite emigrate just to feel safe.

      Most of the elites have been under forced foreign divestiture rules the past couple years, in anticipation of sanctions, so those still there are mostly stuck now.

    4. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Russian Elite don't have to drive.

    5. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is a 3 G merc?
      A merc with a 3G cellphone? Or a merc so gansta that he gets 3 Gs?
      Or maybe 3000000000 mercs?

    6. Re:Pedophiles by jythie · · Score: 1

      Nah, that is perfectly normal sexual desire, PIV. Plus they paid cash, and only poor people are immoral.

    7. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this sucks but did you really have to imply that they are pedophiles? I don't deny that they have their fair share but no more than anywhere else. Actually the last i read about the elite running a pedophile ring was in GB.
      And the mods give you a +3 insightful for this crap.

  3. Counter Logic by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    no longer quality for driving...transgender...because Russia has too many road accidents

    Man, I'd be a better driver with my wanker removed. "Distractuious" women have caused most of my near misses.

    1. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually totalled my car when driving with a very pretty lady. It did not work out with her in the end (immediately after the event), so was a total waste :)

    2. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hopefully you mean 'near hits' because a near miss would just be a hit.

    3. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "distracting" wasn't a good enough word?

    4. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're an idiot. A near miss means that you barely avoided the collision. There's no such thing as a "near hits"

    5. Re:Counter Logic by SternisheFan · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. A near miss means that you barely avoided the collision. There's no such thing as a "near hits"

      George Carlin would disagree with you.

    6. Re:Counter Logic by MadKeithV · · Score: 5, Funny

      no longer quality for driving...transgender...because Russia has too many road accidents

      Man, I'd be a better driver with my wanker removed. "Distractuious" women have caused most of my near misses.

      Could have been worse - could have been complete mrs.

    7. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT's the near misses that cause the near missus?

      Looks it'll be rear ends causing the rear ending now.....

    8. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I nearly missed him - but not not quite".

    9. Re:Counter Logic by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually totalled my car when driving with a very pretty lady

      Did you panic when she started deflating?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    10. Re: Counter Logic by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AC got modded down, but is right. The word 'near' is an adjective in this context. It was a miss. What kind? A near miss.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    11. Re: Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't sound like much of an issue to me. Most slashdot users will rarely have a woman in their car (let alone the "attractive" type).

    12. Re: Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa!!! YOU had a GIRL in YOUR car!!! Please do tell more!

    13. Re: Counter Logic by zennyboy · · Score: 2

      OMG, I actually learnt something today! Had never even thought about it that way before

    14. Re:Counter Logic by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hopefully you mean 'near hits' because a near miss would just be a hit.

      No, in English we say "near miss". It is a contraction of "it was a miss, but very near".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re: Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC got modded down, but is right. The word 'near' is an adjective in this context. It was a miss. What kind? A near miss.

      A transvestite? Or a cross dresser?

    16. Re: Counter Logic by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      It's not "nearly a miss" it's a miss of the very close variety.

    17. Re:Counter Logic by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      Actually totalled my car when driving with a very pretty lady

      Did you panic when she started deflating?

      • She's cuddly and she's bouncy
      • She's like a rubber ball
      • I bounce her in the kitchen
      • And I bounce her in the hall
      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    18. Re:Counter Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it just describes the miss, as it was a near one. A complicated contraction isn't needed to explain it.

    19. Re: Counter Logic by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As opposed to "almost hit" or "almost missed", in which we've got adverb-verb rather than adjective-noun.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Counter Logic by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      See my sig.

  4. They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But are no longer classified as such in the West for political correctness.

    At any rate, it's a pretty stupid reason for refusing to give out driver's licenses. Discrimination appears to be systematic in Russia...

    1. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by C0R1D4N · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's only a disorder if it has a major negative impact on a person or society. The major negative impact from TG people is only that which society places on them and thus an unnatural impact. Simply being taboo is not a reason for discrimination against something.

    2. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      ironically, i just got my DL back today from a 12 mo suspension, so it's cool that a story shows up on /..

    3. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a weird criterion to use. So if my tuberculosis is under control, it's not a disease?

    4. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a weird criterion to use. So if my tuberculosis is under control, it's not a disease?

      Tuberculosis is contagious, and thus has a negative impact on society. Transgenderism is not contagious. If I dress up in women's lingerie, that doesn't mean you have to.

    5. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funnily enough, diseases and disorders don't mean the same thing. That's why we have two words for them.

    6. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no such thing as a mental disorder in science and there is no science behind the list of "mental" disorders listed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). This manual is essentially a fraud and at the core of psychology. While there is no doubt in my mind that there are a lot of screwed up people there isn't a straightforward answer or solution to the problem. Psychology is a fraud- made up to take the money from those who can least protect themselves.

      The list of disorders is a made up list by psychologists voting on what should be a “disorder”. It's not based on science and the industry which pushes drugs as the solution don't even know how these drugs work or what the causes of the supposed disorders are.

      It's not ones sexuality that has a negative impact which is essentially what justifies calling these disorders or many anyway disorders. There is on the other hand a societal problem of people abusing those who don't or can't conform. It doesn't matter if its the color of your skin or your sexual interests.

      Here is a good example: Why did they remove homosexuality and not pedophilia from the list? You might think it's because pedophiles are a danger. However it makes absolutely no sense logically speaking. It's pretty safe to assume most people have something called self-control even if they are in a sexual minority. They don't just go out and rape people at random no matter how difficult it is to find a sexual partner. So where is the evidence it is somehow different for pedophilia? The reality is there is no evidence at all. Physiologists can't even begin to conduct studies that hold up to scientific scrutiny because the legal system and society has ensured those who have not acted criminally (ie raped a child, etc) are excluded from the study (ie no human being is going to answer these questions who has not committed a crime and been convicted because it risks employment, housing, and potentially even jail time regardless of any crime- even if the study is supposedly anonymous).

    7. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Transgender people often end up having myriads of surgeries, taking many pills (often until they get cancer), seeing psychologists for years, and spend most their lives being unhappy until some time after the switch. So yeah, it's a problem for them and it goes way beyond wearing clothes. For the most part, I think society does a good job helping and understanding them. There are also many government programs in place. Maybe you don't see these things because of your own biases.

      But, as it was mentioned before, this is unrelated to driving and it seems Russia is just enacting more discrimination.

    8. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by blang · · Score: 1

      Most young males have a car-driving fetish.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    9. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, if your blond hair and tendency to draw satire is under control, then it's not a disorder that you're a blond satire cartoonist.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the US Army, this is classified as a mental disorder, and will bar one from enlisting, or could bring adverse actions for those already enlisted.

      http://www.sldn.org/pages/transgender-people-and-military-service

    11. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by blang · · Score: 1

      While pshycology is not as easy as other medicine and physics, there is no doubt that it is a science, and that it uses the scientific method to evolve. The workings of the human brain is unfortunately an extremely challenging area to understand, an surely the field has attracted more than its fair share of sharlatans.
      It would be an ironic day when we let cult whackjobs like Tom Cruise or david miscarriage define science for us.
      The for-profit scam was founded by a failed science FICTION writer ferkrissakes. For some reason psychology makes them go ballistic. Because they are whackjobs? Mm?

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    12. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you babbling about? Maybe YOU should go see the psychologist.

    13. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "negative impact on society"

      read that again

      then respond

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    14. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And a lot of the reason for them being unhappy is how the rest of the world treats them. That's not their fault. As to the rest, well, presumably it's being done because it's better than the alternative.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's only a disorder if it has a major negative impact on a person or society. The major negative impact from TG people is only that which society places on them and thus an unnatural impact. Simply being taboo is not a reason for discrimination against something.

      Logic fail. You are now confusing disorder and discrimination. For example homosexuality is a type of a disorder but it should not be discriminated as it causes no harm.

    16. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Simply being taboo is not a reason for discrimination against something.

      The same apply for pedosexuals. As long as they do not rape anyone, they should be free to celebrate their contribution to the spectre of sexual diversity in any way they see fit.

      The LGBTP community sadden by this move from Russia. But the west also has it's share of discrimination. The LGBTP community solidarity extent to all sexual deviant. #EndWitchHunt #Pedophobics #LGBTP

    17. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A "disorder" is a mostly personal issue, stupid-idiot.

      Here's an example that doesn't affect society: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive–compulsive_disorder

    18. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      But are no longer classified as such in the West for ... correctness.

      At any rate, it's a pretty stupid reason for refusing anything allowed to "normal" heterosexuals. Discrimination appears to be systematic in many countries, including Russia...

      TFTFY. Something that, by nature, occurs in a sizable portion of the population, and which has, itself, no debilitating signs or symptoms is not really a disorder, so politics has nothing to do with it.

    19. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The major negative impact from TG people is only that which society places on them and thus an unnatural impact.

      Yes, just wait until some of them get beaten up or killed on the streets as a result of this policy.

      Then, they'll probably also be barred from taking public transportation or using the sidewalks, to avoid the poor other citizens from beating up on them.

    20. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kids, huh? Well, there are 1400 dangerous sexual predators locked up in Coalinga. They should stay there until they die. It would be cheaper to execute them, but California doesn't actually do that, anymore.

    21. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      The major negative impact from TG people is only that which society places on them and thus an unnatural impact.

      I've heard a transperson dispute that, saying that even where people are 100% cool with them, they still feel awful about the mind/body mismatch, to the point of depression, self-harming etc. Gender dysphoria can still be a mental illness even if transsexualism per se isn't.

      Though of course, not in any sane jurisdiction should that prevent you from driving.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    22. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSM-5

      I think he's confusing with "personality disorders", which is a subset of the mental disorders and have a requirement for a negative impact on society (and exclude TG)...

      Personality disorders include psychopaths, histrionics, and so on.

      So, basically interesting but unrelated.

    23. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      stupid-idiot

      "freedom of speech" has ended since you started abusing it like "freedom to insult" You are another one that is affecting our society bad.

    24. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > While pshycology is not as easy as other medicine and physics, there is no doubt that it is a science,

      There is certainly _some_ science. But a tremendous amount of it is theory driven nonsense. Look at how psychological and psychiatric was limited until the discovery of seasonal affective disorder, the better diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, and the unfurling of phobias from the "hidden memory theories" that Freud popularized.

      The reference to David Miscavige and Tom Cruise looks like a reference to Scientology, which makes clearly fraudulent claims about "scientific" discovers but are actually rooted in hypnosis and conditioning under a lie detector.

    25. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply being taboo is not a reason for discrimination against something.

      Let's follow your logic. Murder is a taboo. So, jailing/sentencing to death for murdering is a discrimination, doesn't it? Remember that there's a reason that something is a taboo.

    26. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as yes, the enforced victimhood mentality

    27. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might as well say that Linnaeus was a chalatan and not a scientist because he had no genetic support for the taxonomy he created.

    28. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by kimvette · · Score: 1

      So what is your opinion of intersex people? If you don't know what that is google it.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    29. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      pshycology

      Why are you typing in a Sean Connery accent?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by JudgeFurious · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, you mean "birth defects".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    31. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The major negative impact from TG people is only that which society places on them and thus an unnatural impact.

      I've heard a transperson dispute that, saying that even where people are 100% cool with them, they still feel awful about the mind/body mismatch, to the point of depression, self-harming etc. Gender dysphoria can still be a mental illness even if transsexualism per se isn't.

      Though of course, not in any sane jurisdiction should that prevent you from driving.

      Would you be happy with yourself if you had the wrong body parts? There is so much negativism about transsexualism from a minority of the population that it tends to drown out the fact that the majority are okay with it. After all, it's the same with the bullies back in school - sure, 99% of the kids don't beat you up, but that 1% makes a lot of kids not want to get up in the morning to go to school. They can actually become physically ill from the stress. Would you say that they had a mental illness?

      Obviously the correct course with any medical problem is effective medical treatment. If you had, say, a cleft palette and couldn't get treatment, you'd be pretty depressed too, no? Maybe to the point of self-harm by trying to fix it yourself?

      Now, I'm not disagreeing totally with what you're saying - the negative reactions of others don't help, and the removal of transsexualism as a mental disorder was a big step towards normalizing the situation. Is gender dysphoria a mental illness? I'm okay with that. After all, if it's classified as a mental illness, then that opens up the path to treatment. If we can't make the mind match the body, let's make the body match the mind. And once it's treated (one or more of hormones, surgery, therapy) then they're no longer dysphoric.

      Of course, one big problem with saying that it's a mental illness is that a lot of people think "it's all in your head, yo should just pull yourself out of it." The same way that they treat people with major depressive disorder or ptsd or anxiety disorder. The other big problem is that transsexuals themselves delay seeking help because in many cases we've also bought into the myth that we can "pull ourselves out of it" because we're afraid of the negative reactions from family, friends, coworkers, etc. Can't be done, and you will lose some friends - but with friends like that, who needs enemies :-)

      (me gets ready to be flamed by those in the community who refuse to accept gender dysphoria as a valid diagnosis / disorder)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    32. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The interesting part is that they'd be disallowed driving in Russia as soon as they SOLVED that problem. As long as they live miserable lives in the wrong body they're a-ok to drive.

      Care to explain that logic?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    33. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Try drawing a parallel with something that doesn't directly affect others but only the affected person and come again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    34. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Wonder if they have to compensate for something.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Probably NSFW, watch it at home.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    35. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And a lot of the reason for them being unhappy is how the rest of the world treats them. That's not their fault.

      Well, the Russians bring this on themselves by continuously electing a "strong leader" who can "stand up to the West" because it has relegated them to a has-been world power.

      Oh, you meant transgendered people.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    36. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, you mean "birth defects".

      Wow, you're a charmless fucking cunt, aren't you?

    37. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does mean that actually...but that his own disorder.

    38. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you are biologically male but identify as something you are not, you're out of touch with objective reality.

    39. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why did they remove homosexuality and not pedophilia from the list?

      Does the phrase "informed consent" ring any bells? A true paedophile would presumably not class any sexual actrivity between an adult and a child as automatically wrong.

      Now, if you're talking about people who are purely paedophiles in their own heads, that's a different matter, as you can act inside your own head however you please.

      You are correct that more research into this area is needed. But the idea that the vast majority of paedophiles will never act out their desires seems unrealistic in the extreme.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    40. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Sometimes. Not always of course but often enough.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    41. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, so, what do you intend to do about it? Just kill them?

      As somebody with body parts of mismatched gender and forced to live as the gender the body part between my ears is not, I'm beginning to think that would be more humane.

      I just haven't gotten around to offing myself yet because every time I get close I always wonder if all suicides necessarily go to hell and maybe if I can endure you cisgendered shits and your shit attitudes and bigotry and this shit world until something else kills me, maybe there will be a heaven where I can enjoy being cisgendered as well.

      You fucks coddle useless bags of flesh born with Down's syndrome who can't contribute one fucking iota to society, but OH MY GOD we'd better make life shit for anyone who can't live as their legal gender assigned at birth.

      captcha: dogmas

    42. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that started to break down for a bunch of situations when psychologists decided 'people will treat you like crap' did NOT count as a negative impact of the condition.

    43. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      Which is the same reason we don't bother with prosthetic limbs, fix congenital heart defects, or develop software allowing paralyzed people to communicate, it would be coddling them!

    44. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by blackomegax · · Score: 1
    45. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little cosmetic surgery will solve the problem that they believe themselves to be something they objectively will never be?

    46. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that while it is only the 1% that is doing the beating, they have tacit social approval from the other 99%. Sadly most of the population is not really 'ok' with TG issues, they are just not actively nasty about it, but nor do they provide any social repercussion for those who are. Bullies bully the people they can get away with bullying, and what they can get away with is defined by the majority.

    47. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 2

      Well, here we have to separate psychology as a science from the political process of writing the DSM. Within psych I generally see agreement (when people are willing to speak on it) that pedophilia, like homosexualty, should not be on the list. Research on the subject is historically extremely corrupt, with the vast majority of 'it is an illness' papers exclusively using the prison population as the sole source of subjects, which is kinda like using only people convicted of sexual assault as examples of hetrosexuality, kinda a joke.

      However, it is a deeply political issue, one that is not helped by LGBT (well, LG at least) activists and leaders have integrated that particular moral panic into their platform, so the political pressure to remove homosexualty came with the added baggage of ensuring pedophila stayed on the list.

      This, however, is quite separate from the actual research or even treatment fields of psychology. It is kinda like comparing the congressional committee on science and technology to actual scientists. One is political, the other actually has work to do.

    48. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      Ahm, that sounds a lot like adjusting theories based off new evidence and research. Not too long ago physics and chemistry had some pretty whacky stuff in them, but things improved once better tools and frameworks were developed. Psychology is a really bloody difficult field with much cruder tools to work with, it is no wonder they are improving slower. Still, over the last few decades as brain scans and such have become more accessable to researchers and protocols have been refined to eliminate more and more contaminates, the theories have been getting better.

      That is how science tends to work, you never start off with a nice clean absolute answer, you have guesses based in the best data you have available and then try to improve from there.

    49. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      That assumption is no more correct than it was for homosexuals or hetrosexuals. The vast majority of pedophiles, like any other sexual interest or orientation, are generally capable of distinguishing rape from consent. Few act out on it with an actual minor, but research and public perception tends to be pretty skewed since it only ever comes up with someone is raped. When you look at research that looks at the general population though, you do not really see any higher of a rate then any other group.

    50. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by RoLi · · Score: 1

      It's only a disorder if it has a major negative impact on a person or society.

      Well they have a high risk of becoming a murderer (about half of serial killers are homosexuals, which is an overrepresentation of about 1000-2500%) of becoming murdered (by aforementioned killers), of suicide and of sexually transferrable diseases.

      To say that this is caused by "discrimination" is just flat out wrong, because the murder-rate tripled during the "sexual revolution", and did not decrease. Arguably a virus like AIDS could not have spread so wide and far before it as well. So the "reduction of discrimination" (which in the West has become special privileges already) actually decreased the homo-life expectancy, both because of murder and diseases. So it's the exact opposite of what you are claiming: Discrimination actually protected them from themselves.

      People who are not brainwashed by Hollywood (for example the good people of Russia) know that. And now when the West has declared war on them, there is no longer a reason to suck up to the West.

      Good for them.

    51. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Wow a Scientology apologist

    52. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      That Scientologists are nut jobs, which was obvious.

    53. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it's like how everyone shamed Michael Vick for hosting dogfighting. They literally didn't have a dog in that fight and should have let him mind his own business. Most of the crime associated with dogfighting exists only because they have to keep it underground.

    54. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The problem there is that while it is only the 1% that is doing the beating, they have tacit social approval from the other 99%. Sadly most of the population is not really 'ok' with TG issues, they are just not actively nasty about it, but nor do they provide any social repercussion for those who are. Bullies bully the people they can get away with bullying, and what they can get away with is defined by the majority.

      One of the problems is that when we experience "negative reactions", we don't stand up to defend ourselves. It's not reasonable to ask others to take a stand for you if you, as the victim, aren't willing to take a stand yourself. Society has put into place mechanisms, laws, human rights tribunals, and courts to address this, but most transsexuals don't use them because of a very valid fear of further repercussions, embarrassment, and physical harm. I've had to use the tribunal twice to drag public apologies from people. I figured written apologies in the largest newspapers was the appropriate "punishment", but I understand that most transsexuals and other transgenders would be reluctant to have their name and trans-ness mentioned in print.

      And this is the real problem. We act like we're ashamed, and that gives permission for others to take advantage of that. They KNOW that we won't complain, that we're reluctant to seek support from the community at large. Our silence is part of the problem. We need to lose the embarrassment and get a heaping helping of PRIDE. It's very liberating, and every person who refuses to keep quiet helps those who are still living in the shadows out of fear.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    55. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      I would say these are two ends of the same basic problem. I can comment, at least when I was in school, standing up for oneself did not do much good and often resulted in getting pushback from the 99% for being 'mean' to the bully.

    56. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by SchroedingersCat · · Score: 2

      Let me get this straight: if someone wants to be Napoleon - let them and buy them bicorne as part of the treatment?

    57. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I would say these are two ends of the same basic problem. I can comment, at least when I was in school, standing up for oneself did not do much good and often resulted in getting pushback from the 99% for being 'mean' to the bully.

      I can't count the number of times I got "the beats", at school, outside of school, at home, just for being perceived as a bit different ... it was wrong, and we have to stand up against it because it's still happening. I think part of the problem is that many people who know someone who is a transsexual don't know that person is a transsexual, so they can't put a face to it when they hear about some stranger being harassed.

      People who know someone who is trans are usually more tolerant, even encouraging, because they know that someone who is trans is still a human being, not a freak. I've gotten some criticism (and some hate) over my .sig, but someone has to stand up. Browse this thread at -1 to see just a small sample of what APK has been the last week.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    58. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight: if someone wants to be Napoleon - let them and buy them bicorne as part of the treatment?

      I would first ask them "Which Napoleon?" (No, that's not original, one of my friends asked that to someone who was delusional, with interesting results).

      If someone wants to go around dressed like Napoleon, what's the big deal as long as they're not doing anyone any harm? So sure, by them the funny hat if you wish.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    59. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a ploy to make them keep their sexuality a secret. They'll keep driving, but it will be against the law to tell anyone they're gay.

    60. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      You manage to misrepresent transgenderism in one fell and foul swoop there.

      Gender, in terms of how the brain is wired, is actually wired into the system before the testes drop or not. To cut a very long and technical story short, you are mentally wired to be male or female regardless of how your body turns out. For a small percentage of society, this means that their brains don't match their physical attributes, and the consequence of this is indeed a life long quest to become "right".

      Stigmas and taboos are quite counterproductive for these individuals, and what Russia is doing is a gross violation of human rights. Then again, I don't expect much sympathy from US citizens, because the LGBT community is still under siege in the US as well. Laws are discriminatory, and public discourse is not very accepting of these folks. All you need to do is watch some Fox News and you'll get the gist.

      Characterising the transgendered plight as "dress up in women's lingerie" only serves to exacerbate this situation, even if the intentions are quite OK.

    61. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Holy shit Slashdot moderators, you gave this +Interesting points?

    62. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by jythie · · Score: 1

      Well, that was one of the key reasons the public view of homosexualty changed so radically over just a few short decades; more people out in the open made it more likely there was some personal connection or at least a personal face involved.

      Though your 'Tt' point highlights possibly one of the worst but insidious issues involved, the internal fractures within the trans community regarding who is 'doing it wrong' and 'ruining our political chances'. It is almost like there is a contest to figure out who gets to be the trans community's NAMBLA to kick out.

    63. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There is on the other hand a societal problem of people abusing those who don't or can't conform. It doesn't matter if its the color of your skin or your sexual interests.

      Well, of course, that's the whole point - to marginalize the "out group" and in this case, gain political favor by oppressing them.

      The Universal Declaration of Human Rights to which Russia is a signatory, says:

      Article 13: You have the right to move about freely within your country. You also have the right to travel to and from your own country, and to leave any country.

      And this has always been interpreted to mean "in the common manner of travel", not that humans must be allowed to crawl from place to place through a forest while dragging a dead ox. So Russia's claim is a clear human rights violation by the standards of International Law (not that it has power) even if they aren't protected by their own laws.

      But propaganda is a powerful thing. You should hear the number of Americans who parrot the "driving is a privilege" propaganda that Drivers Ed. courses teach, despite the UDHR and the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution. It's a powerful technique, and even after people have had the logic shown to them, they will still argue for the diminution of their own rights, because to acknowledge them would be to create a moral imperative to action, and that's not entertaining.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    64. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      And that's totally not the excuse every fascist and authoritarian uses to curb free speech and dissent.

      I am sorry comrade; you must not insult the Kremlin. Such speech is harmfully affecting our society bad[sic]

      Wait- Putin is that you?

    65. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Transgender people often end up having myriads of surgeries, taking many pills (often until they get cancer), seeing psychologists for years, and spend most their lives being unhappy until some time after the switch. So yeah, it's a problem for them and it goes way beyond wearing clothes."
      So maybe society needs to find a better treatment for this disorder?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    66. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It's there for historical reasons. Historically, the T in GLBT represented transsexuals, who are a very very small minority of the transgender population, with radically different needs and goals. GLB are about sexual orientation, not gender identity. When people started using LGBT instead of GLBT, they also included all transgendered, of which transsexuals again are only a small part, and with different needs and goals - we need medical help to turn our outsies turned into insies or vice versa. Nobody else in the LGBT needs medical help to be who they feel they are.

      There's been some debate inside the transsexual community as to whether we should or should not tie our cause to the greater LGBT community because of the this; I have always been of the opinion that we're all in this together, and we all have an overarching goal to be free to live as who and what we are, and I don't see that changing any time soon, especially since transsexuals can be straight, gay or lesbian, or bi. It's complicated :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    67. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you mean by "in science". There are numerous things that can be wrong with a mind, such as depression. We can and do study these scientifically, although it's really difficult sometimes. We have found drugs that are useful in some forms of depression.

      So, in what way isn't depression a mental disorder? It's mental, it's a fairly stable condition rather than something ephemeral, and it's bad. It isn't just a matter of societal prejudice against depressives (although that is a problem), because it has several ill effects. What more do you need? It's true that depression is a collection of more-or-less related symptoms, and it seems very likely to me that it encompasses several very different things (much like the common cold, which is quite a few similar diseases with more-or-less common symptoms).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    68. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gender, in terms of how the brain is wired, is actually wired into the system before the testes drop or not. To cut a very long and technical story short, you are mentally wired to be male or female regardless of how your body turns out. For a small percentage of society, this means that their brains don't match their physical attributes, and the consequence of this is indeed a life long quest to become "right".

      That's an interesting hypothesis, to be sure. I wonder if it's testable.

    69. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the classic "homosexuals = pedophiles" argument.

      The difference is obviously that children are not able to legally consent to sexual activity.

      Go post your homophobic rants somewhere else.

    70. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can see a possible rational for bullying them into compliance. That being said, does that really work? And is the fact that some people are disgusted with TD people really a major problem to begin with? Won't the stance of Putin just lead to more suicides -- like it currently happens in US high schools for young gay males? And won't this kind of policy just prevent TD people from contacting the police when they really need it for fear of being bullied even more by the police itself? This is essentially a short-sighted policy for what is essentially a taboo.

      Once a government authority implicitly gives the silent nod to start punishing a group of people, then things can quickly escalate when bullies think they're acting on the wishes of their government. This new official discrimination policy is going to have far reaching consequences, many of which won't have anything to do with the driver license itself.

    71. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Ooops: I should have said TG people, not TD people.

    72. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cept for the killing dogs for sport part.

    73. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      Must be a birth defect. Maybe they'll invent a pill to fix that someday :)

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    74. Re:They (well some of them) are mental disorders by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      It's only a disorder if it has a major negative impact on a person or society.

      Well they have a high risk of becoming a murderer (about half of serial killers are homosexuals, which is an overrepresentation of about 1000-2500%) of becoming murdered (by aforementioned killers), of suicide and of sexually transferrable diseases.

      [citation needed]

      And please, something respectable. Don't waste your time by linking to the 'Family Research Institute' or 'Conservapedia'.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    75. Re: They (well some of them) are mental disorders by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      pshycology

      Why are you typing in a Sean Connery accent?

      I thought he was just drunk. Drinking and Slashdot do not go hand in hand.

  5. lose lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So there will be a lot more people driving without licenses. Perfect lose-lose solution.

    1. Re:lose lose by jythie · · Score: 1

      A more likely effect will be a higher profit margin on bribes for DMV officals.

  6. source? by xfizik · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can't seem to find a link to any official government document about this. On the other hand, people tend to readily believe anything about Russia.

  7. Impaired driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And yet alcoholism is not on this list of disorders that lead to increased road accidents...

    1. Re:Impaired driving by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Funny

      And yet alcoholism is not on this list of disorders that lead to increased road accidents...

      Then there would be no Russians driving.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Impaired driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there would be no Russians driving.

      The main problem on Russian roads is that it is not only socially acceptable to drive while drunk, it is pretty much also the expected behavior.

      The situation will not improve until that changes.

    3. Re:Impaired driving by guacamole · · Score: 2

      Actually, Russian drunk driving laws have been getting tough too. 0.0356% BAC is considered DIU (0.08 in USA)

    4. Re:Impaired driving by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Alcoholism is F10 and is banned.

    5. Re:Impaired driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DIU? Driving Intoxicated Underwear?

    6. Re:Impaired driving by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You ever been to Russia? If you're not plastered you wouldn't DARE to drive there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Impaired driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Russian drunk driving laws have been getting tough too. 0.0356% BAC is considered DIU (0.08 in USA)

      The real question is how well the laws are enforced and followed. And the answer is: not at all.

      It is socially acceptable to drive drunk in Russia and the odds that you get punishment from that are really low. If you cause an accident and get caught (and don't have friends important enough), you will get a stiffer sentence if you were drunk, but otherwise there are practically no consequences for drunk driving.

    8. Re:Impaired driving by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You ever been to Russia? If you're not plastered you wouldn't DARE to drive there.

      Liquid courage!
      No wonder that crop-duster guy from Independence Day was sauced when he flew into the spaceship at the end.

  8. Too bad there's no correlation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's no reason to think that removing driving license due to any reason other than BAD DRIVING will improve public safety.
    If Russia can go all gestapo big-brother nanny-state like this, then why don't they just do that to solve the problem by disqualifying bad drivers?

    Wait... what did you just say about not the problem they're trying to solve?

    1. Re:Too bad there's no correlation... by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yes, here's the actual problem, map of alcohol consumption by country where darker colours are more alcohol consumption and lighter colours are less and grey is no data:

      http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/news/...

      Original article:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/heal...

      Long story short, is that Russia's driving accidents problem is almost wholly down to the fact that it's a nation of rampant alcholics. The rest comes down to poorly maintained cars and roads and a nation with weather that results in terrible driving conditions for half the year.

      So absolutely nothing in this new law will fix the problem it purports to fix, hence, it's safe to assume that it's in fact wholly about minority oppression.

    2. Re:Too bad there's no correlation... by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Well, imagine somebody having epilepsy while driving. Or seeing some green devils and killing a pedestrian while avoiding such devils. Or hearing voices of $DEITY that order the pedestrians to be killed.

  9. I can only just laugh at this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World is huge.. Its time for those people to take migration seriously.. RUSSIA can tomorrow say NO PASSPORTS for people with sexual disorders because they can spread the epidemic!! (I know.. Bullshit RIGHT?)

    1. Re:I can only just laugh at this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Migration is for rich people, you insensitive clod. If you hadn't skipped history class in school, you'd have learned that poor people stay put while the rich and the powerful draw borders around them. The only exception is called genocide.

    2. Re:I can only just laugh at this news by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      My god. Is anyone really that stupid?

      To think that anyone would have mistaken Ellis Island for something OTHER than a 5 star resort. Providence, Boston, NY, etc were filled with the affluent upper crust of Europe in the early 20th century right? right? =/

    3. Re:I can only just laugh at this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homeless Joe Beggar on the streets of London just booked passage on a ship for free, did he? Are you really that stupid? Yes, you are. Did you know that the Mayflower voyage was funded by wealthy cloth merchants? No, of course you didn't. Learn some history, you ignorant fuck.

  10. Takes attention away from Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Russian economy is collapsing, the Ruble has plumetted, all because the entire economy depend on gas and oil sales and the price of oil has dropped due to fracking.

    Putin, the election rigger, is to blame. So how do you draw attention away from Putin's failure to run the economy?

    So his spin men have chosen a minority to attack, in this case transgender people, so he can whip up the homophobic portion of Russia and get them arguing with the more tolerant people, and nobody is looking at him, his failure and his corrupt dictatorship.

    1. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked for the czars, it'll certainly work for Putin ..right?

    2. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Rei · · Score: 1

      Putin, the election rigger? Oh please. It's clearly legitimate that 99,5% of Chechnyans voted for "The Butcher of Grozny". Turnouts of over 100% in some precincts in Grozny, well, people were just *that* excited to get to vote for him!

      --
      If you play a Ke$ha song backwards, you hear messages from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forwards you hear Ke$ha.
    3. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 0

      The price of oil has dropped due to need to punish us Russians for Crimea. Your US fracking companies that go bankrupt in the process are "collateral damage". They need US$80 per barrel to survive. Brent is 50. Sorry but Crimea is ours, period.

      The second. We have rushed to supermarkets in panic. I personally have bought a UHD TV for use as a display, a last model of video card for it, a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera and lenses and all accessories for it. And I am a poor scientist with less than average wages. I believe it's quite different from the third world crowds buying flour, isn't it?

      Third. I personally hate Putin for being not enough Putin, not too much Putin.

      And the last. The persons that have ruined the Russian economy are seen better from Russia than from USA. And, which is quite expected, they all have graduated from USA universities.

    4. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It's just because of this I don't vote for Putin: He promised to be a "Butcher of Grozny" and I voted for him because in 1990-s I was really tired of reading everyday news about criminal bands from there. You Americans are shaken with a single Boston terror act by Tsarnaev, now please imagine similar acts every day. Instead, he became "Buyer of Grozny", spending terrible amounts of our tax money to bribe Chechens into submission. No wonder they vote for him.

    5. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Check this out man. I personally think Crimea should have stayed part of Russia but that decision was made during the Soviet era by your leaders. No big deal, leaders make mistakes (US leaders sure make plenty of them) but then when the Soviet Union broke up Russia didn't demand the return of Crimea to where it really belonged. Then when Ukraine agreed to give up their nukes Russia agreed to honor their borders. So tell me, why can't Russia stop being a lying piece of shit straddling the continents of Europe and Asia and actually keep their word? As for the oil that's a huge misconception on your part. Saudi Arabia is cranking out the production to undermine your economy and they're doing it at the behest of the United States because that's how that stuff works. They did it in the early 80's under Reagan and completely shuttered the US domestic oil industry once before. I know because I lived through it. Reagan took away your only major export then challenged your country to a military buildup race and broke your economy in the process. It was a pretty good plan if you think about it. We can afford it. We can sacrifice our oil industry (which really is no big deal because it's not like the oil is going anywhere) and let cheap fuel power the rest of our economy into prosperity. You on the other hand depend on fuel prices because your economy is shit in every other way imaginable so when we take that away you feel the pinch. Yes, Crimea is yours forever. At least your heating oil will be cheap this year. Can't say the same about much of anything else.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      all because the entire economy depend on gas and oil sales

      I think we're about to see how much of the modern Russian economy depends on being able to drive.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    7. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      1. Russia didn't demand return of Crimea. It was before Kosovo/Kosova, you know. But it changes nothing about Sevastopol. It is NOT a part of Crimea as Washington DC is NOT a part of any of US states. It's a federal property and should become a Russian property according to "Zero variant" treaty duly signed by Ukraine. It was annexed by Ukraine from Russia.
      2. Nukes off in exchange for territorial integrity is a letter of intents, not more. The treaty that required Ukraine to be nuclear free is a Lissabon treaty of 1992. http://newru.org/mif-o-budapes...
      3. The oil prices are set by international traders. You believe it's not possible to influence them? And if you remember 1980-s then you remember that the only real value of dollar after the fall of Bretton Woods is the USA-Saudi agreement and fact that anybody who sells oil for anything except dollar will become democratic - Saddam wanted euros and Iraq is a democracy now. Qaddafi wanted a gold dinar and Libya is a democracy, too. Imagine how much Obama wants to bring democracy to Iran, Syria and Russia. Especially after the SPb, Russia oil exchange began trading oil for yuans.
      4. You keep dollar high and gold low. You cannot stop it. And it only means that Putin cheaply buys gold. And he buys gold nonstop. Russian gold resources still grow during all this crisis. Chinese do the same. Imagine how glad is Obama. And how much he wants to make oil cheaper.

    8. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Putin is "The Butcher of Grozny", the GWB and BHO are mass-murderers of Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, Syria etc.

    9. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by AndyG314 · · Score: 1

      3. The oil prices are set by international traders. You believe it's not possible to influence them? And if you remember 1980-s then you remember that the only real value of dollar after the fall of Bretton Woods is the USA-Saudi agreement and fact that anybody who sells oil for anything except dollar will become democratic - Saddam wanted euros and Iraq is a democracy now. Qaddafi wanted a gold dinar and Libya is a democracy, too. Imagine how much Obama wants to bring democracy to Iran, Syria and Russia. Especially after the SPb, Russia oil exchange began trading oil for yuans.

      The price of oil is set, like the price of all goods by supply and demand. There are two ways to influence the price of anything, alter supply or alter demand. Demand is set by many independent actors all buying things, this is very hard for any entity to control. Supply on the other hand is often controlled by a few entities, restrict supply the price goes up, allow more supply the price goes down. This was OPEC's game for years. The price of oil was sky high for years, encouraging more production, which in turn created more supply, which brings prices back down. Not to mention demand decreases as people were driven to more fuel efficient vehicles, and explored alternative energy sources. Add in tough economic conditions around the world causing a softening in demand, all of this combined to crater the price of oil. But that low price will spur demand and that will cause the price to go back up. I know it's not as sexy as a conspiracy theory, but supply and demand curves accurately describe the way prices are set. (Which isn't to say there AREN'T conspiracies, they usually focus on limiting supply however, and how successful they are usually comes down to solidarity).

      Obama can't control the price of oil, if he could, he would have dropped the price before the midterm elections that saw his party loose control of the senate.

      While it certainly benefits the US that many nations price oil in dollars, it is mostly because the dollar is a strong, stable currency, that maintains it's value. Nobody want's rupels or yuans when they can have dollars instead. Russia's current currency crisis is all that is needed to show why.

      Many counrtires, including Russia and China keep reserves of US currency and bonds, to use to prop up their own currency if need be. This is also the only real reason to keep large gold reserves as well.

      4. You keep dollar high and gold low. You cannot stop it. And it only means that Putin cheaply buys gold. And he buys gold nonstop. Russian gold resources still grow during all this crisis. Chinese do the same. Imagine how glad is Obama. And how much he wants to make oil cheaper.

      I'm not entirely sure what you mean here, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The price of gold is up, not down. The dollar's strength is mostly due to the euro being week. Putin and the Chinese can buy all the gold they want, they can keep it in a big vault and swim in it Scrooge McDuck style, who cares?

      --
      If it's dead, you killed it.
    10. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by Cederic · · Score: 1

      1 - No idea whether the oil price is intentional economic sabotage or not but Russia's actions over Crimea are reprehensible.
      2 - Nice choice of camera. Doesn't change the fact that your economy is currently pretty fucked.
      3 - You want Putin to do what then? Oppress even more people for being "not like him"? Invade even more countries? Be an even bigger cunt? Become even more corrupt?
      4 - You live in a corrupt oppressive aggressive nation and you're blaming everyone else for this? Ok.

    11. Re:Takes attention away from Putin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There was a particularly funny incident where one of the electoral districts in Dagestan reported 100% turnout, 100% yes vote, all in person. And then if you looked at the list of voters registered in that district, you'll see two or three names from the local "most wanted" terrorist list.

  11. I can only just laugh at this news by snipfacts · · Score: 1

    not a coward btw

  12. Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:source? by De_Boswachter · · Score: 4, Informative
  13. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, xfizik got rekt

  14. source? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    Obligitory: "I soviet Russia, the government readily believes anything about YOU".

  15. hummer in a Hummer? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    totalled my car when driving with a very pretty lady

    "Darling, you look absolutely smashing, tonight!..."

    1. Re:hummer in a Hummer? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      "...and you've done a bang-up job on your hair. You are a total knock out! I go to pieces just looking at you."

    2. Re:hummer in a Hummer? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "...oh, and that dress is to die for! No woman has ever had such an impact on me."

  16. Insanity by basecastula+ · · Score: 2

    The Russian government has gone off the deep end. I guess they read Hitler's playbook.

    1. Re:Insanity by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Promoting "family values" (and subsequently bashing / prosecuting anything that falls outside the norm of those values) is a tried and true way for politicians to ingratiate themselves with their "conservative" (for lack of a better term) constituency. It costs nothing in terms of money and political capital, if they play it right. President Fattah el-Sisi recently did the same by sharply (an unexpectedly) ramping up prosecution of homosexuals in Egypt. Not a priority for him, but a cheap way to win some brownie points with conservative voters after a few unpopular measures. And do you really think conservative politicians in the West give that much about gay marriage, given that they often have a decidedly "live and let live" attitude towards other matters?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Insanity by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Long time ago I has some friend (not partner; I am natural) who was GAY. And he told me that GAY community is quite secretive.

      So, I believe that all the Gay Pride movement as well as anti-GAY campaign has no connection with GAYs. It's an organized and well paid aggression against traditional moral from one side and an attempt to raise popularity as a conservative politician from the other one.

      Some time ago, Putin required all political organizations obtaining money from abroad to be registered as such. It was a brilliant move of a Real Tyrant: it appeared that almost ALL the political opposition is on USA payroll.

    3. Re:Insanity by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      Anti-family values is also an easy way to get votes. Do you really think Obama promotes sodomy for the benefit of the country?

    4. Re:Insanity by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Not really, it was Hitler who removed the "unnatural"-clause in the homosexuality-paragraph 1935. That's no big surprise because most of his buddies were homos. Yes that is correct: before 1935, homosexuality was considered unnatural and you could lose your civil rights, afterwards it was just an ordinary minor crime. A big step for the LBGT movement.

      And if you don't believe me, just look up the laws on Wikisource. This is not some conspiracy-nut war-propaganda, it's a law that was put on the books and everybody can check it - if they are interested in the truth, which most aren't.

      The homos only got retroactively "victims" of the Nazis in the 1970s.

      He also was a vegetarian and a fan of animal rights. A real progressive.

    5. Re:Insanity by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

      I think you have the interpretation wrong. "On May 6, 1933, students led by Storm Troopers (Sturmabteilung; SA) broke into the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin and confiscated its unique library. Four days later, most of this collection of over 12,000 books and 35,000 irreplaceable pictures was destroyed along with thousands of other "degenerate" works of literature in the book burning in Berlin's city center. The remaining materials were never recovered. Magnus Hirschfeld, the founder of the Institute and a pioneer in the scientific study of human sexuality, was lecturing in France at the time and chose not to return to Germany. The destruction of the Institute was a first step toward eradicating an openly gay or lesbian culture from Germany. Police closed bars and clubs such as the "Eldorado" and banned publications such as Die Freundschaft (Friendship). In this early stage the Nazis drove homosexuals underground, destroying their networks of support. In 1934, the Gestapo (secret state police) instructed local police forces to keep lists of all men engaged in homosexual activities. Police in many parts of Germany had in fact been doing this for years. The Nazis used these "pink lists" to hunt down individual homosexuals during police actions. On June 28, 1935, the Ministry of Justice revised Paragraph 175. The revisions provided a legal basis for extending Nazi persecution of homosexuals. Ministry officials expanded the category of "criminally indecent activities between men" to include any act that could be construed as homosexual. The courts later decided that even intent or thought sufficed. On October 26, 1936, Himmler formed within the Security Police the Reich Central Office for Combating Abortion and Homosexuality." www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005261 The removal of the word unnatural broadened the definition of homesexual acts. The wiki says the same thing about the 1935 changes. It went from unnatural lewdness (anal sex) to plain lewdness. In the little bit of history included, you will notice how the nationalists also banned homesexual studies and literature. Does that sound like Putin's laws regarding homosexual propaganda?

    6. Re:Insanity by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You're wasting your breath; you're dealing with a radical here who posts ridiculously-revisionist history so he can grind his political axe.

      Hitler was a gay-loving progressive? Give me a break.

  17. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The document does not mention directly transsexuals and transgenders, but it refers to MKB-10 classification, where they are considered mentally ill.

  18. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by gslavik · · Score: 1

    very last point is funny: height less than 150cm (4'11").

  19. Putin disorderlyfulness by Fully+Functional · · Score: 1

    But President Putin has the "exhibitionism" mental disorder. Also allegedly he also has "voyeurism" disorder, but I don't think that has been proved.

    1. Re:Putin disorderlyfulness by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter: He may employ a driver.

  20. And the rules for Putin? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fetishism, exhibitionism and voyeurism are also included as "mental disorders" now barring people from driving.

    Since Putin apparently likes to ride around half-naked on horse-back?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re: And the rules for Putin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about his SCUBA pic... what a crock, right?

    2. Re:And the rules for Putin? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      you don't need a driving license for a horse.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:And the rules for Putin? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Even SHARIA law allows men to be naked except from waist to knees.

    4. Re:And the rules for Putin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even SHARIA law allows men to be naked except from waist to knees.

      Why do you assume that's the half that Putin had covered?

    5. Re:And the rules for Putin? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      Solution.

      Every Russian should trade in their car for a horse :D

    6. Re: And the rules for Putin? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A latex pervert. Ewwwwww.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:And the rules for Putin? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Because there are some photos of Putin either completely naked, with his organ up, (which I believe to be photoshopped), or covered from waist down (which corresponds to Sharia law). H have never seen pictures of Putin covered from waist up. See also "Wrestling" by Donskaya-Khilko. http://www.kip.ru/realtime/201...

    8. Re:And the rules for Putin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't asserted.

      The point was that Putin is a exhibitionist and mentally unstable because of it, under these rules.

    9. Re:And the rules for Putin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well good thing he has a chauffer then, huh?

  21. People who persecute others by presidenteloco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    are generally full of fear and insecurity.

    Even though they act tough.

    The Russian government is rabid with fear at the moment.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:People who persecute others by SchroedingersCat · · Score: 1

      Like California government and gun owners. The nut jobs who are in charge is the only difference: left or right.

    2. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California bars gun owners from driving? That's news to me.

    3. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drive with the gun in the glove compartment and go to jail for a year.

    4. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They bar peoples from owning gun, and even some type of pocket knives. You own insecurity show as prevalent as the California state. You must be faggot with little penises. It's okay. Many fag in California like tu suck small dick.

      If you can't deal with your neighbour having arms then that is your business, but if you lobby the state to deprive them of their right then you need therapy.

      TLDR; Fuck off.

    5. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't, you clueless fuck. I can legally own guns in California just fine.

    6. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also be gay in russia - you just won't be able to drive unless you [leave your gun] in closet.

    7. Re:People who persecute others by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      California motto should be, regulate first measure second.
      They seem to pass laws quickly for every trend that goes on. It doesn't matter if it is a problem or not. They will proudly show how progressive they are when they randomly pass a good regulation. But there are a bunch of stupid laws too, that gust got passed because it seemed like a good idea.
      I live in New York State by no means a red state. But at least I can go grocery shopping in VT and travel back to NY and not get stuck at a check point where I need to relinquish my fresh foods.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:People who persecute others by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Or amoral sociopaths who are doing it as a dispassionate, calculated act solely to increase their own power and authority.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    9. Re:People who persecute others by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      The Russian government is rabid with fear at the moment.

      At the moment? You were aware that Stalin the prime motivator behind Stalin's atrocities was paranoia don't you? The Gov't of Russia has been in a perpetual state of freak-out for nearly a century.

    10. Re:People who persecute others by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Many fag in California like tu suck small dick.

      You know, I never really thought about that before. I guess if you enjoy giving head then avoiding uncomfortable stretching of the mouth and bruising at the back of the throat is probably optimum.

      This opens a whole line of Google search based investigation that I'm not sure I want in my browser history..

    11. Re:People who persecute others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but think anal sex. The anus did not evolve to be a sex organ. Even if you love anal sex, it can be painful even at the best of times- especially if you're rocking porn star cock. So little dicks in the ass can really wail away on it and as long at it is long enough to hit the prostate, you're golden. Anything past that is useless anyway. Women can definitely tell you that there is such a thing as a dick that it too big. They drop watermelons through there, mind you. The threshold for too damned big is much lower regarding the anus so little dicks rule this arena!

  22. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://government.ru/media/fil...

    The second page of that document contains a list of disorders, as classified by the ICD-10, that prohibit one from driving -- numbers in the right column. The descriptions are here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICD-10_Chapter_V:_Mental_and_behavioural_disorders

    As you see, F60-F69 includes all of the following:

    (F64) Gender identity disorders
    (F64.0) Transsexualism
    (F64.1) Dual-role transvestism
    (F64.2) Gender identity disorder of childhood
    (F65) Disorders of sexual preference
    (F65.0) Sexual fetishism
    (F65.1) Fetishistic transvestism
    (F65.2) Exhibitionism
    (F65.3) Voyeurism
    (F65.4) Paedophilia
    (F65.5) Sadomasochism

  23. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google translate - I assume "Personality disorders and behavior in adulthood" would cover gambling, sex habits, etc

    GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION on December 29, 2014 1604 MOSCOW
    On the list of medical contraindications, medical indications and medical restrictions to driving
    In accordance with paragraph 4 of Article 231 of the Federal Law
    "On the Road Safety" The Government of the RussianFederation
    To approve the attached:
    list of medical contraindications to management vehicle;
    list of medical indications for Motor Vehicle means;
    list of medical restrictions to driving agent.
    Prime Minister Russian Federation D.Medvedev
    Government Resolution Russian Federation on December 29, 2014 1604
    medical contraindications to driving name of the disease code disease ICD-10 *
    I. Mental and behavioral disorders (in the presence of chronic and prolonged mental disorders with severe persistent or painful symptoms are often exacerbated)
    1. Organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders F00 - F09
    2. Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders F20 - F29
    3. Mood disorders (affective disorders) F30 - F39
    4. Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders F40 - F48
    5. Personality disorders and behavior in adulthood F60 - F69
    6. Mental retardation F70 - F79
    II. Mental and behavioral disorders due substance use (up to the termination of the dispensary observation in connection with the stable remission (recovery)
    7. Mental and behavioral disorders related to substance use F10 - F16, F18, F192
    III. Diseases of the nervous system
    8. Epilepsy G40
    IV. Diseases of the eye and adnexa
    9. Achromatopsia N53.51
    10. Blindness in both eyes H54.0
    * International statistical classification of diseases and related problems health (10th revision).
    Government Resolution Russian Federation on December 29, 2014 1604
    medical indications to driving
    I. Medical indications to driving manual
    1. Deformation of the foot, significantly impedes its movement.
    2. Shortening of the lower limb more than 6 cm (except for the cases when the limb has no bone defects, soft tissue and joint range of motion is stored, the length of the limbs the heel bone to the middle of the greater trochanter of the hip more 75 cm).
    3. amputation stump of both thighs.
    4. amputation stump of both shins.
    5. thigh or lower leg stump one limb at a significant violation of motor and static functions other lower limb (amputation stump foot deformity, vascular disease, damage to major peripheral nerve trunks and others.).
    6. Persistent deformity or disease of the lower limbs, pelvis or spine, greatly complicates the standing and walking (ankylosing arthritis of the lower limbs, severe kyphoscoliosis and spondylitis with symptoms of compression, pseudarthrosis, endarteritis II and III degree, elephantiasis et al.).
    7. Paralysis and paresis of the lower extremities with the possibility of sitting.
    8. Damage to the neurovascular bundle one lower limb with significant trophic disorders (extensive non-healing ulcers).
    II. Medical indications for operation of the vehicle Auto transmissiey
    9. The absence of upper limb or hand.
    10. The absence of lower limb or foot.
    11. Deformation of the hand or foot, greatly complicates movement of the hand or foot.
    12. Stump thigh or lower leg, while the absence of a of the upper extremities.
    13. The absence of fingers or phalanges, and immobility in interphalangeal joints:
    a) the absence of two phalanges of the thumb on the hand;
    b) lack of immobility or 2 or more fingers on the right hand or complete reduction of at least one finger;
    c) absence of immobility or 3 or more fingers on his left hand or complete reduction of at least one finger.
    14. Residual effects of central nervous system as hemiplegia.
    III. Medical indications for operation of the vehicle, equipped with an acoustic parking system
    15. Blindness in one eye.
    IV. Medical indications for operation of the vehicle using a driver of the

  24. Odd by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a transgendered on any of the dashcam videos showing those Russian traffic accidents. Lots of drunken or sober morons, some hetero distraction going on, but none of that "pervert" stuff.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Odd by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's why it's easy to forbid. It only affects a minority.

      Try to outlaw booze or ogling and you'll have half a country wanting you fired. Out of a cannon.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. time to publish putin medical records. by blang · · Score: 1

    At least the pictures from his famous historectomy. Think it can be found at goatse something.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    1. Re:time to publish putin medical records. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think you only find a very apt portrait pic of him there: The biggest asshole in existence.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. russia is devolving by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it crushes political maturity and instead offers worship of one super strong super tough exkgb goon putin, like north korean cult of personality bullshit

    rather than diversify the economy it tries to become a petrostate (now with crashing oil prices)

    it panders to simpleminded fears and hatred now with gays and sexual minorites, so it is culturally and socially rotting too

    is russia trying to weaken as best as it can?

    with a surging imperialist china, which has a border dispute with every single one of its neighbors: stealing land from india, stealing philippine/ vietnamese/ japanese islands, etc... how long until china says "fuck it" and just flat out takes siberia from sick pathetic dying russia?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:russia is devolving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it panders to simpleminded fears and hatred

      Yeah, but every country is doing that nowadays. It's in vogue.

    2. Re:russia is devolving by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      No-one can invade Russia. They have nukes. Lots and lots of nukes, combined with a leader unpredictable enough that he might actually use them. The deterrent works.

    3. Re:russia is devolving by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a weak, poor country can be defeated in myriad ways

      china doesn't have to militarily invade siberia. it can just corrupt officials, pay russian legislators to make laws friendly to it, own all of the companies operating in siberia, flood the area with immigrants, etc

      such that the map may say russia, but for all intents and purposes, it will be china's siberia

      russia showed us how to unilaterally take another country's sovereign territory with crimea

      flood the area with your own citizens. then they simply announce what country they really are a part of after some political turmoil in the country's capital. which, weak as russia is, should be easy for a rich china to corrupt

      bloodless

      http://abcnews.go.com/Internat...

      sure, texas being snatched form mexico wasn't bloodless, but by the time the mexicans put up a fight, it was too late: the immigrant population had already tipped allegiances

      the change will be slow and inevitable. nobody will nuke anyone because it won't be an overnight military invasion. just immigration leading to gradual social and political realignment, helped along by corrupting influence

      http://www.nytimes.com/roomfor...

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:russia is devolving by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      actually the real deterrent is that if you invaded, you would need to take care of the russian common folk.

      there's a 833 mile border between Russia and Finland. one thing russians are good at is keeping the russians on the russian side of the border...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:russia is devolving by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      is russia trying to weaken as best as it can?

      It's a common side effect of a leader removing any potential competition for his job.

    6. Re:russia is devolving by Rei · · Score: 1

      Nobody's going to be taking anything from a nuclear armed state. The most I think anyone would ever dare do is covertly support breakaway rebel movements, but even that would be extremely provocative.

      That said, there probably will be an upsurge in internal rebel acticity in Russia as they lose their ability to pay off local tribal leaders with oil money like they've been doing extensively of late....

      --
      If you play a Ke$ha song backwards, you hear messages from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forwards you hear Ke$ha.
    7. Re:russia is devolving by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, Russia has given Damanski island to China, some village to Azerbaijan and lots of shelf to Norway.

      And the internal rebels are on payroll of Er-Riyadh, too. So they are not so internal.

    8. Re:russia is devolving by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      china doesn't have to militarily invade siberia. it can just corrupt officials, pay russian legislators to make laws friendly to it, own all of the companies operating in siberia, flood the area with immigrants, etc

      Great idea, flood the place with Chinese people, then move in military units to "protect them"! Russia won't see it coming!

    9. Re:russia is devolving by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      machiavelli... who learned it from the romans... but in truth, tribes have been vying against each in turf wars since before we were even completely human, and a slow infiltration was always a tactic, if not even purposeful. europe will be muslim by the end of the century for example

      http://www.mayanastro.freeserv...

      On the subject of colonization, Machiavelli says essentially what one would expect-that it is a cheap and effective way for a foreign power to exert its influence over a weaker neighbor without much risk of retaliation. To say at the same time that he originated the idea of using colonies to invade other nations would be to give him credit for a concept that had already existed in Western civilization since the time of the Roman expansion into Europe. What he says about the utility of colonies for the purpose of seizing control over foreign principalities, apart from a few marginal differences, can be found as early as 250 A. D. in the work of the early Christian Father Tertullian who records essentially the same ideology. The difference might be that Tertullian used a moral argument about reducing redundant populations caused by lechery who could be sent to the colonies to ease the stresses of overpopulation in the homeland; while, Machiavelli advocated using them to spearhead an invasion force directed against the overthrow of the ruler of an existing principality or as a force to maintain power once the ruler had been overthrown. He says that

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:russia is devolving by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      llive by neoimperial colonization, die by neoimperialism colonization

      georgia and ukraine should be smiling at the karmic justice

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    11. Re:russia is devolving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the change will be slow and inevitable. nobody will nuke anyone because it won't be an overnight military invasion. just immigration leading to gradual social and political realignment, helped along by corrupting influence

      Wait, are we talking about Siberia or California?

    12. Re:russia is devolving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, Texas being snatched from Mexico? You do know Texas was its own independent nation before joining the United States, right?

    13. Re:russia is devolving by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it was all american colonists

      texas wasn't going to remain independent, that was a temporary placeholder

      and i'm not saying the rest of the usa was going to insist texas join, i am saying this according to the intents and purposes of americans in texas

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  27. That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian gays can just ride a bear instead of driving. Like Putin does!

    1. Re:That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian gays can just ride a bear instead of driving. Like Putin does!

      woohoo! Giddyap, cowboy, er, bearboy, ride that barebear

    2. Re:That's okay by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Russian gays can just ride a bear instead of driving. Like Putin does!

      woohoo! Giddyap, cowboy, er, bearboy, ride that barebear

      Adds a whole new meaning to the term "bare-back/bear-back".

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:That's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why're ya avoiding & downmodding this Barb http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' you can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  28. Disqualifies Putin by mendax · · Score: 1

    The fact that Putin is a psychopath should disqualify him from a drivers license.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    1. Re:Disqualifies Putin by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The fact that Putin is a psychopath should disqualify him from a drivers license.

      But that should not disqualify him from being gay.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Disqualifies Putin by Megol · · Score: 1

      His reign doesn't seem to be especially merry.

    3. Re:Disqualifies Putin by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to think of the word, I think it is Homosoviaphobic. In Russia it could be Phobahomosovic.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:Disqualifies Putin by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Since you brought it up...

      It often seems to be the case that the most vociferous anti-gay politicians, preachers, etc., turn out to be closeted gay themselves. They use anti-gay rhetoric as cover, to makes themselves appear more "straight." So, can you think of anyone who appears to be over-compensating in the "I am a straight male" department? Just asking...

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  29. But what about people who have megalomania?? by Knightman · · Score: 1

    Like a certain russian leader...

    But then, I guess they have drivers.. :P

    --
    --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    1. Re:But what about people who have megalomania?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I guess they have drivers.

      I can't afford a driver or press agent. Instead I have the selfie stick and the selfie toaster.

  30. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gays have caste privilege in the west, and zero tolerance in the east.. whatever happened to equal opportunity for all?

    1. Re: great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't lived south of the Mason-Dixon line in any of the less densely populated counties, have you?

      (Disclaimer: This has been a rhetorical question.)

    2. Re: great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You haven't lived south of the Mason-Dixon line in any of the less densely populated counties, have you?

      (Disclaimer: This has been a rhetorical question.)

      Eg; the only place where gay privilege do not exist. Where somebody's character is measured by what he accomplish instead of what he claim to enjoy in bed.

    3. Re: great by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Is that so? Well, then you can certainly tell me what the accomplishment of a lowlife is who has done nothing but drag his carcass to some church every Sunday.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that so? Well, then you can certainly tell me what the accomplishment of a lowlife is who has done nothing but drag his carcass to some church every Sunday.

      These lowlifes harvest food every year that feed the well intended, culturally diverse, politically correct, privileged, higher class that live in the cities. That along is a accomplishment worth of praise and respect. As for going to place of worship, there are religious retard in all social classes.

  31. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in the truck & bus drivers' category.

    I do read Russian, but it's not my native language.

    As a result of briefly scanning through the document, I did not find any reference to anything sexual, but I would not expect that either. I would expect it to be buried somewhere under the "psychological conditions" category which lists broad groups of diagnosis codes.

  32. Sounds good to me. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yea I agree. Clearly there are some people in this country that see themselves as members of some of these mental and behavioral disorder groups and want to get a lot of people worked up about this. Hard to get worked up about who Russia gives driver licenses to when they are busy invading and annexing other neighboring countries and shooting down civilian airliners (well. to be fair, just one recently). Perhaps those who live lifestyles that many would consider perversion could effect more change in Russia by opposing Putin's invading other nations than by opposing who they give the privilege of driving to.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Sounds good to me. by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 0

      1. We have NOT annexed Crimea, we just a) Took it from unlawful possession of other party or b) Agreed to will of Crimean people to become part of Russia. Choose any variant you like, both are OK: The transfer of Crimea from Russian SFSR to Ukrainian SFSR has been done with violation of applicable laws, and will of Crimean people is as valid as will of Kosovar people which you supported when it was good for you.

      2. I cannot know for sure who shot the airliner. But what I know for sure: The nominal route goes over Southern Crimea. There was a command from Dnepropetrovsk center to move the route to the war zone, and no Dnepropetrovsk records were given to investigation and no Dnepropetrovsk control people were kept for investigation. It's enough for me to understand who shot it. Also, the BUK rocket weights about 1 ton. When it starts it roars as hell and produces a pillar of smoke. It's impossible to miss a pillar of smoke in a daytime where every dog has a camera in it's cellphone. No pillar of smoke was ever seen.

      3. I have a freedom to keep a veggie field and to buy raw milk from my neighbor. You haven't, due to Monsanto (Yes, I read your survivalist sites). I will survive in any crisis, you will not. And all your freedoms are nil and void if you have no freedom to survive.

      And BTW you have a Second Amendment. Is it possible to bear arms traveling from, say, New York to San Francisco?

    2. Re:Sounds good to me. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      1. The will of the people when voting under armed guards of the invading country? Unlawful possession when it was the agreed upon border? You do realize that the Stevenspol (or however spelled...) naval base was a rental right?

      2. The sat pictures are quite clear on where the missiles were, and the photos show a pretty spectacular plume from the launch, did you miss this news?

      3. No one can stop you from growing anything or drinking whoever's milk in the US, that is pure BS. Monsanto has patents on specific seeds, not all of them. You can feel free to plant non patented seeds any time you like and cultivate them with impunity.

      Final. Yes. You put them in your trunk, perfectly legal, however they may not be legal under NY or CA's laws on guns, which is not a federal law.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Sounds good to me. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I have a freedom to keep a veggie field and to buy raw milk from my neighbor. You haven't, due to Monsanto (Yes, I read your survivalist sites).

      That is pretty much the very worst source to get any insight on how life is like in the United States.

  33. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think the same. The document does not mention sexuality directly in any way, but the groups of psychological diagnosis codes are not immediately known to me.

  34. Re:Fark.com? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Given slashdot is a news aggregator by definition they need to be late to the party as someone needs to post it first.

  35. Sounds legit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like a woman, drives like a man? An accident waiting to happen. You don't want to play chicken with the rooster.

    1. Re:Sounds legit. by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      Looks like a woman, drives like a man? An accident waiting to happen. You don't want to play chicken with the rooster.

      Well I'm not dumb but I can't understand
      Why she walked like a woman and drove like a man
      Oh my Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  36. Re:Homosexuality by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  37. Ahh Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... included as "mental disorders" ...

    They tried to legislate wealth as immoral; that didn't work. But they're not done with the old favourites: Anything outside heterosexual monogamy causes immorality or insanity. Sometimes, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

  38. Re:Everyone is a star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a good wetsite.

  39. Transgender Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't understand the issue. You've heard of alien hand syndrome, yes? It's where your brain is telling you that your body is wrong in some way. It's not fixable and not a choice. It's not a disorder that hurts anyone else, but it will completely fuck up your life. The only way to get your brain to stop destroying everything good in your life is to change your body. No one at any point is being coddled, for most people the best outcome is a slightly better circle of hell, and only after what is invariably the worst time of your life.

    You only get one life, and for a huge percentage of transgender people, between the options of life with body dysphoria and self-mutilation, death is a preferable alternative. And yes, even if you are transgender, it's still (more or less) thought of as a mutilation, a relatively risky procedure with many drawbacks, a chance of terrible complications, and a lifetime of medication afterwards. In a few centuries when gene splicing is perfected, your style of bigotry will still exist, because it has nothing to do with the state of medical science and everything to do with rejecting others who are different. And believe it or not, no one really cares what your opinion is — no one is going to try to change your mind about it. If you think it is okay to contribute to the torment and suicide of other people, we clearly have opposite notions of morality, but so be it. What we are going to do is insist that you not be a bigoted asshole in public, and especially not in public office and public legislation.

    1. Re:Transgender Persons by JudgeFurious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I look forward to having better options to treat these people than simply carving them up and reassembling them into what they feel like they should be. That seems like figuring out how to let an anorexic live a productive life on a 300 calorie a day diet. It would be better to find a way to genuinely solve their problem instead of making a poor substitute for a member of the opposite sex out of them and putting them on hormones for life. At some point we'll be able to actually fix issue in their brains and this entire issue will hopefully fade into history. Come on progress!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re: Transgender Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're just a step away from what Doctor Adder was doing in KW Jeter's novel.

    3. Re:Transgender Persons by ausekilis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this is an incredibly short-sighted look at this. What we are talking about is changing genes, changing neural links, or fundamental brain chemistry (which we kinda do already... see medications). The human brain is incredibly complex and the only way we know to "fix" it is surgery to remove something like cancer, or via medications. To fundamentally change neural pathways or genes would be to fundamentally change the person, with unknown side effects. To suggest we can simply "fix" them ignores some well observed side effects of "traumatic brain injury". Likewise, the brain will adapt in a concept called neuroplasticity, it will rewire a damaged portion to a new section of the brain.

      There are people out there who have no choice in the matter. For example intersex individuals, such as those born with 2 X's and a Y, are uncommon, but are out there. We are not necessarily talking gender dysphoria. Rather, we are talking someone who does not strongly express either gender. My understanding is that parents typically want males, so given the choice early on that's what they opt to have the doctor go for (and resulting surgery). Later on in life that may impose gender dysphoria, not because "he feels like a woman", but because his body is actively producing hormone levels of both, perhaps with a leaning toward one or another. This is not some psychological conditioning, this is a fundamental issue with the chemistry of their body. How do you suppose we fix that? A series of invasive surgeries? Years of therapy to "deal with it"?

    4. Re:Transgender Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually kind of a scary thought, fixing the issue in their brains.
      What other 'defects' are we going to want to fix in people's brains?
      I'm not saying that today's surgeries are not relatively crude, because, while a lot better than those 30 years ago, yes.
      But you'd rather someone change the very organ that defines YOU than have more subtle, effective solutions for the myriad other organs involved?
      Changing the body will always be easier

    5. Re:Transgender Persons by jythie · · Score: 1

      The problem is, well, it is a birth defect. LIke any birth defect, the best you can generally do is repair the damage sometime later in life. Fixing the physical errors will probably always be simpler than going in and changing neurology. The only 'best' long term solution would be some kind of retrovirus or other sci-fi tool that rebuilds the body correctly.

    6. Re:Transgender Persons by blankinthefill · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who has had a lot of interactions with trans people... there are not many of them that would argue with you. A few, maybe... but most don't want it any more than a 'regular' person would. My favorite quote from someone on the topic is "I may be crazy, but I'm not insane. I don't want to go through this any more than people who are against trans people want me to go through it... but it's a hell of a lot better doing this than being dead." Note that the last part was that persons personal preference. In the case of many trans people, at least at some point in their life, this is not true. (More than 40% of trans people attempt suicide at some point in their lives.) But as the matter stands now, and (as ausekilis points out) for the foreseeable future, that is sadly the ONLY effective way to treat all but the least severe forms of GID. (Just therapy can help in some cases, but in most just therapy is not enough.)

    7. Re:Transgender Persons by Caspian · · Score: 1

      Trans woman (that means "body born 'male', brain 'female') speaking up here.

      I hate being trans. I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. I would sooner wish a slow, painful death upon someone than wish that they share in this agony.

      But I'd sooner jump off a building than take some hypothetical treatment that would make me want to be male.

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    8. Re:Transgender Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better to find a way to genuinely solve their problem instead of making a poor substitute for a member of the opposite sex out of them and putting them on hormones for life. At some point we'll be able to actually fix issue in their brains and this entire issue will hopefully fade into history.

      Are we talking about transsexuals or hormonal contraception? Because if a woman does not want to bear children, it would be so much easier to fix the issue in her brain and turn her into a lesbian instead of making a poor substitute for an infertile member of her sex out of her and putting her on hormones for life.

    9. Re:Transgender Persons by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      Sure. Next up: a 'cure' for being gay. Or lesbian. Or a conservative. Or a liberal.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    10. Re:Transgender Persons by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      That's unfortunate because you're far more likely to get a treatment that made you content being the man you were born than a genuinely effective way to make your body into the female that you believe you are supposed to be. I feel for you because that can't be easy but eventually it will be treatable and when that happens you'll have the opportunity to make that decision though it won't come down to "jump of a building or be male". It will probably look more like "jump off a building, be male, or continue as you are dealing with it the best way you can" because thankfully society seems to (slowly) be getting better at this kind of thing.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    11. Re:Transgender Persons by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Not likely. I don't think that's the same thing.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  40. great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of homos parking across two spaces, or just stopping in the middle of the road to pick up their boyfriends. And dykes drive aggressively and cut people up all the time

    1. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes if they cause more deaths then your suggestion is totally valid.

    2. Re:great idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You sure it's homos and not just a jerk? And that's really a dyke and not just some shrew on PMS?

      Frankly, if you use THAT as an indicator, the "official" statistical number of gays is way, way too low.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Politicians with mental disorders by vanyel · · Score: 2

    They should ban politicians with mental disorders such as fixations on other people's lives - such cause far more harm to society than any other class of people.

    1. Re:Politicians with mental disorders by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, but what are we going to do with the congress and senate building when nobody is using it anymore? Not to mention Penn Ave 1600.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yep. Just as I thought.

    More hysterical/desperate propaganda, which judging by the response, far too many of you are allowing past your 'smartypants' filters.

    You have to stretch reality completely out of shape in order to perceive this law as having *anything* to do with gays, let alone as being repressive toward them as a social group. I wonder how far the TV talking heads in the West will pursue this canard?

    The authors of this law were, it seems to me, (if I can depend on the translation being close to accurate), fairly rigorous in their definitions so as to make it clear that only conditions which actually affect one's ability to drive safely are listed. They even put qualifiers in brackets after point #1, which is probably the closest item which the propagandists can strive to thread their tenuous connection to.

    Any interpretation beyond this being anything but a vanilla bit of road safety legislation is for Hysterics and True Believers.

    But just you watch. This is one of those "repeated often enough" lies. A year from now, it can be pretty much guaranteed that most of the people you talk to who don't pay attention to things will actually believe that Putin is personally trying to keep gays off the road.

  43. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by dbIII · · Score: 1

    F65.3 seems to be providing half the packets on the internet. Ever looked at a picture of someone having sex? You can be defined as a voyeur for that if someone nitpicks enough.
    This "mental disorders" ban is fucking insane, but it makes the sort of reactionary pricks that push this sort of thing look "conservative" to their support base. Yet another symptom of what happens when a state is under the control of a very small number of powerful people.

  44. Sadly, this will probably be popular in Russia. by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is the point...Putin is an unreconstructed Chekist and will continue to distract his oppressed population with this and other nonsense, plus of course more serious meddling like Ukraine and Syria.
    Since the average Russian is typically homophobic, racist, and "patriotic", this is an easy play.
    Putin is mired in corruption, has totally failed to deliver on economic & political reforms and re-balancing the economy and the Ruble is tanking in the wake of falling oil prices.

    So expect plenty more of this rubbish.

    Actually improving road safety would involve "hard" stuff like tackling endemic police and court corruption, drink driving (although the legal limit is theoretically zero), anti-social attitudes and quasi-mafia idiots driving too fast in SUVs equipped with automatic weapons and large lights on the back specifically designed to blind people following them.

    Ever wondered why you see so many youtube videos of "funny" things on Russian roads? It's because many people have dashboard cams to support their case with the insurance company when the inevitable accident happens; it really is that bad.

    1. Re:Sadly, this will probably be popular in Russia. by guacamole · · Score: 1

      If Americans were required to carry a dash camera for insurance claims, I am sure you would have seen on youtube plenty of the American road stupidity too.

      The dash cams simply prove that Russians are the kind of people who tend to cheat the system, be it the government or an insurance company, if you take their word without a recording. Probably a result of 70 years of living in a massively corrupt country where everything is a state property and therefore can be stolen. Sometimes I think that the millions killed in repressions during the Stalin era WERE NECESSARY to run a tight ship in USSR. As soon as Stalinist repressions ended, corruption and mafia spread like a hydra in USSR.

    2. Re:Sadly, this will probably be popular in Russia. by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Corruption and mafia ran pretty well in Stalin era.

    3. Re:Sadly, this will probably be popular in Russia. by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I think that the millions killed in repressions during the Stalin era WERE NECESSARY to run a tight ship in USSR. As soon as Stalinist repressions ended, corruption and mafia spread like a hydra in USSR.

      You are right.

    4. Re:Sadly, this will probably be popular in Russia. by sudon't · · Score: 1

      If Americans were required to carry a dash camera for insurance claims....

      I drive 2500 miles per week on American roads. While I see a lot of stupidity, we have nothing to compare with what I've seen from Russian dash cams. The situation in Russia is different because, in part, they haven't been driving very long, and yes, the huge alcohol problem. And, this is just a guess, but by the attitudes of people, I'm guessing there's a much smaller police presence on Russian roads than in the US. No one seems remotely concerned that the cops might roll up any second.
      Americans, particularly nowadays, have internalized much of "safe driving" propaganda they've been taught their whole lives. I don't think Russians get a lot of this, but if they do, they haven't had the time to become socialized to a "safe driver" culture.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  45. Re:Homosexuality by hufter · · Score: 1

    Some scientists have suggested that, in ancient times, homosexuals were beneficial to society, because they took care of orphans. (sorry can't find a reference now. i read that in a science magazine years ago)

  46. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 3, Informative

    The CD-10 is an international standard WHO document.

    If the world is so hung up on this, then perhaps they can take it upon themselves to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from their own book of definitions.

    Chess, anyone?

  47. Great idea by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, maybe next we should just put them all in camps, concentrate them, so they're away from "decent" people. And then, perhaps, make them wear something so we all know who they are, like a pink triangle or something?

    Of course, these are all just temporary measures; I'm sure we'll ultimately come up with a better Final Solution...

    --
    -Styopa
  48. Consistency by Roodvlees · · Score: 1

    At least they are being consistent in placing anyone that's a little bit different out of society.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  49. Russians, help me understand by dltaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Resident or expats, please try to fill in the blanks.

    Is there simply enough anti-homosexual bias in Russian culture, as in much of the USofA, for Putin to make political "points" by picking on them?

    Is he thinking of using a relatievly powerless "out" group for a Kristallnacht if the economy experiences problems due to falling oil prices?

    Pay-back, which he is known to do, for not supporting his acquisition of power?

    Wild idea: is he thinking he can pressure homosexuals to produce more children as as some sort of social "cover", to build a population for a war?

    Something else?

    1. Re:Russians, help me understand by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Russia is simply showing its true colors. "Homesexual" is pretty much a swear word in Russia culture.

      Many people in the West think that Putin is oppressing the democracy-loving Russians, but in reality, 90% of Russian MPs, most mayors, all governors, the military, and the executive branch of Russian government think like him and support him. Most people who live outside of the liberal Moscow and St Petersburg cities also support him. This law wouldn't pass without and overwhelming popular support.

    2. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you asked: in Britain homosexuality was a criminal offence until not long ago. The key reason for this was the same as in todays Russia, and
      it is called Christian morality. Now for you this probably does not mean anything because of the newspeak of the Anglican church, or because you
      simply do not care about these issues. For russians it (still) has meaning (and had meaning even in the time of USSR with its atheist indoctrination).
      One of the problems with you (americans) is that you are so brainwashed by your own propaganda (I mean your mass media which is owned by six large
      corporations, and who are essentially telling you the same story), that the idea that other people have different beliefs and values looks to you
      "illegal", as soon as these beliefs contradict your (US) laws, looks to you as a justification to bomb or starve other people.
      The imperialist mentality is rooted deep inside US, whether we talk about "geopolitics", or other people beliefs.

    3. Re:Russians, help me understand by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Informative

      Resident or expats, please try to fill in the blanks.

      Is there simply enough anti-homosexual bias in Russian culture, as in much of the USofA, for Putin to make political "points" by picking on them?

      Lived and worked there for a while.
      Short answer is "yes". Putin flogs the image of the bare-chested "hero" and protector of family "values".
      (The reality of course is that he's a botoxed crooked womanizer...)

      But note: Most educated middle-class Russians detest Putin and his clique and are pretty nice people on the whole. Unfortunately, they're also mostly very racist and homophobic, (including the women). Of course, the same applies to many other places; India and the South of the USA spring to mind...

    4. Re:Russians, help me understand by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      These middle class Russians of which you speak sound nice like KKK members are probably nice if you're white and Christian.
      Last I checked, niceness is a trait that applies to how you treat all people, and not just those that deviate from one's small-minded ideas of what categories people should fall into.

    5. Re:Russians, help me understand by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Errr *DON'T deviate.
      Stupid, stupid. Proofreading necessary.

    6. Re:Russians, help me understand by spatular · · Score: 1

      It's done to get some political points. Most people here are homophobic, actually I can't think of a word that denotes homosexual that isn't a swear word. And it's a serious insult to tell someone that he is possibly gay.

      Economical situation here is pretty bad, and will stay so at least for a year or two. This is result of oil prices, sanctions and western capital withdrawal. So Putin need to gain some support and almost everything will do.

    7. Re:Russians, help me understand by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

      Some time ago, the Soviet power allowed the prison moral "Ponyatiya" to escape to the wild, which is quite understandable due to repressions. And according to Ponyatiya, there is an hierarchy between the inmates where passive homosexuals are in the lowest position and are untouchable, except as a sexual object. The popular hate to homosexuals has no connection to Christian moral.

      About the Gay Pride: I think it's proven that the Gay Pride has no relation to the homosexuals and is the movement paid from abroad and is pressured as such which is OK.

      About Crystal Night: I believe it may exist. For long time Putin paid his elites with right to steal. There should come times when it's just not enough oil to steal and the Crystal Night becomes necessary. Unfortunately, I see just the opposite: the elites that openly sabotage the economy according to the best Harvard methods and Putin who either cannot or doesn't want to stop it.

    8. Re:Russians, help me understand by spatular · · Score: 1

      Well, I wouldn't say that russians are in general racist. There was influx of people from Georgia in 1990-x that were involved in organized crime around local food markets and that tried to set their laws here. Of course nobody liked them. They've dissipated somewhere though. Now there is a lot of people from Tajikistan, they illegally take very low-paid jobs, rent apartments and live like 10 people in a room. Neighbours obviously don't like them, government officials take part of their salary (that's how they get job illegally), rest of people consider them totally uncool. That's pitiful state of affairs.

      There are definitely neonazi fractions, but I'd say they are not popular.

      Generally life here is not easy, homophobia and racism don't put food on the table, so they are somewhere in perepherals of attention.

    9. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mix very different things: one is the lawlessness in prisons, the other is the attitude towards homosexuals. About the latter, you claim "The popular hate to homosexuals has no connection to Christian moral". You are wrong. What you are right about, that the attitude IN PRISONS towards homosexuals has no connection to Christian moral.

      "About Crystal Night: I believe it may exist. For long time Putin paid his elites with right to steal.." - it seems like it is the US propaganda who is doing the thinking for you (Hillary Clinton?). Listen to latest Putin press conference (its content; about the form you may have valid objections). And tell me after that where do you exactly see signs of racism, or antisemitism, or whatever. Take into account that this press conference was not directed primarily at western audience (so it is not the case that he is saying something to Russian public, and another thing to the western public).

    10. Re:Russians, help me understand by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Libertarian Europe here, not imperialist US, may I still join the game?

      No matter what excuse you use to oppress people who have done nothing wrong to you, especially if you cite your imaginary friend as if that was any remotely sensible reason for anything, let alone oppression of a portion of your population: YOU ARE WRONG.

      Not because the media say so, not because we want to bomb you, not because you have a different belief system, but because your belief system involves worshiping an imaginary buddy who must be quite an asshole if he hates people simply for what they are.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Russians, help me understand by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      I must stress again: The prison moral has escaped to the wild and became moral of the society. And also: There is NO lawlessness in prisons (except from guards, of course). The "Ponyatiya" are VERY strict laws, they are interpreted by "Thieves in Law", fulfilled and their violation is immediately punished. The "Otmorozki" (people who don't observe the Ponyatiya) are not tolerated.

    12. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first, don't illude yourself you have no "imaginary buddy" - of course you have it, it is called the dollar. Second, I don't wish to oppress anyone. However, I beleive it is my basic right to state freely that I don't like homosexuals, that I consider homosexuality to be a sexual perversion, and that I don't want to have anything to do with them (as it is your basic right to state you don't want to have anything to do with me) - if possible. I believe It is my right that they don't pass under my window with their obscene slogans, and exhibiting to everyone on the street to which degree of perversion they can arrive. I believe it is my right not to be exposed to infinite sermons about the rights of homosexuals, and to hope to start hearing something meaningful from you about how you mean to start correcting the damages of your western imperialism to the rest of the world (and which also the infinite sermons about the homosexuals rights help you to avoid).

      And most of all - stay in your own house and make whichever absurd laws you wish to make, but please don't try to "correct" other people; the experience which
      you have - the western colonialism in Africa, America, Asia, and, speaking about US, the two atomic bombs - should strongly discourage you from doing so.

    13. Re:Russians, help me understand by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      South of the USA??! wtf dude your racism is showing. South of USA is where all the black people live, you're shitting all over them and got modded up to +4 that is some bullshit.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The prison moral has escaped to the wild and became moral of the society" - there is some truth in this. However, this does not give a faithful image of the Russian society.

    15. Re:Russians, help me understand by fed.p. · · Score: 2

      Filling in some blanks, though perhaps not the ones you had in mind. This did not make the news in Russia, so I do not think anyone is trying to win any brownie points by doing it. The government passes a c**pload of laws monthly and a huge amount of them are useless, illogical and/or just for show. In this case please note that the ban also extends to alcoholism, practically all the types of depression including seasonal affective disorder, practically all the types of anxiety including general and social, those suffering psychological effects of drugs, and heck, why not, pathological gamblers. That's not exhaustive... Further, when you read about a law like this you are thinking damn, these poor people won't get to drive! Truth is, this means nothing. To get a drivers licence you need to present a medical certificate but no one actually goes through any actual tests to get one. You pay and either get it without seeing a doctor, or if you go to an organisation that tries to be in more of a grey area you go from doctor's office to doctor's office, spending 1-2 minutes in each and they sign off after asking 1-2 questions and not actually looking at anything. When I did this, in fact, I walked into yet another doctor's office and he asked me something which I did not make out, so I asked him "what?". He said "I said, how is your hearing?". Heh. I said good, and he signed and off I went.

    16. Re:Russians, help me understand by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Russians have long and well-deserved reputation for xenophobia.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    17. Re:Russians, help me understand by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The dollar is not more my buddy than something I step into. It's with me, whether I want it or not, but that doesn't make it my buddy.

      Second, listen to yourself. You escalate your demands. First you say that you don't like them. Then you say you consider them perverts. Then you say you don't want to deal with them. Then that they should not walk on your street. Then that they should not express themselves. Then that they should not be allowed to ask for human rights. Is that where you wanna stop or can we start building the gulags?

      Are you often boiling frogs? Or were you testing how far I can say "ok, ok, that's within your rights" and when I start to say "nooo, that goes too far"?

      As for "meddling with affairs of others": Russia isn't quite the country that should complain about that too much right now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leaving apart the question of your belief system, as you put it (since I indeed know close to nothing about you, except that you claim to be a libertarian), let me just note the following:

      You claim that I said that "..they should not walk on your street". What I did say was " It is my right that they don't pass under my window with their obscene slogans, and exhibiting to everyone on the street to which degree of perversion they can arrive", by which I meant, if this was not obvious, their "parades" which they insist on conducting in about every place on the planet, also in places where it is obviously considered to be a provocation (such as Jerusalem).

      Then you claim that I said "..they should not be allowed to ask for human rights". What I did say was "it is my right not to be exposed to infinite sermons about the rights of homosexuals". Would you deny that the discussions about the oppressed rights of lgbt in the western media are given much more space than questions such as the expansion of NATO to the east (nobody asks "why"), attacks on Christians in Africa, and the undeniable human rights violations, as you like to call them, by the former Baltic republics and Ukraine in what regards the people of Russian culture?

      "Are you often boiling frogs" - you probably know better than me what this means. About sending homosexuals to GULAG permit me not to answer.

      "Russia isn't quite the country that should complain about that too much right now" - after US-led coup in Kiev, in which EU also took a role, perhaps it is you who should not complain too much. And, by the way, read a bit about "Ucraine" history - it might make things clearer for you.

    19. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of people just don't care about this law.

      "LOL, yet another stupid law"
      "imagine policeman checking driver's sexual orientation LOL"

      As for gays and sexual minorities, most of people are not hostile to gays. It's shame to be openly gay(but not lesbian) in russia, but it's ok to be gay non-openly. everybody knows that many of russian actors, politics are gays.

      Of course, if you are going to visit weird places with lots of agressive youth, it will be bad idea to identify yourself as gay, but hooligans may attack your for thousand different reasons(why are you wearing/not wearing a hat? why are your hair so long/short?, where are you from?, give me some money,etc).

      Putin cannot make any political points out of this law because people want him to start really fighting with corruption, increase salaries for teachers and doctors, jail so called "liberals"(actually disgusting kommies) and so on.

    20. Re:Russians, help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are definitely not russian.

      I don't know anybody who thinks putin is a "hero" or "protector of family values". Maybe he looks like this from abroad, but in russia, people care about: tariffs, taxes, corruption, medical care, schools, roads, attitude to so called "liberals". Idiots who believe in "heros" died out in 1990s.

    21. Re:Russians, help me understand by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Russians, help me understand by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Expat.

      Is there simply enough anti-homosexual bias in Russian culture, as in much of the USofA, for Putin to make political "points" by picking on them?

      Yes, there is enough anti-homosexual bias. Remember that it was criminalized in the USSR since Stalin (IIRC it was the only country in the Soviet bloc to do so), so the decriminalization was not a super long one, and it was never combined with effective propaganda of tolerance, so even when legal it was socially frowned upon. Probably about the same level as some of the more backwards Southern US states like Mississippi or Alabama. A certain degree of religious conservatism played into it, too, especially as religion became more fashionable.

      Is he thinking of using a relatievly powerless "out" group for a Kristallnacht if the economy experiences problems due to falling oil prices?

      Gays wouldn't make an effective group for those purposes, they're too small. What they're doing is identifying a broader group of, basically, what amounts to pro-western liberals. If you go by election results, this is about 10% of the voters, mostly middle age - those who are old enough to have seen the USSR and known all its deficiencies, but not old enough to retire then or shortly after and therefore longing for the ultimate welfare state. The older ones mostly just want their pensions. The younger ones haven't really seen what soviet life was really like, and are often easily duped by propaganda describing how good it was (esp. if it emphasizes the points that were actually good and glosses over all the bad parts), and how the dirty liberal fifth column hired by American/Anlgo-Saxon/Western elites ruined it all to destroy their strongest competitor.

      Anyway, the gist of propaganda against that group is that they're 1) acting in foreign interest to destabilize and ultimately destroy the country, and 2) do so not only through political means like Maidan, but also covertly by destroying social morals and replacing them with the decadent Western immorality. Needless to say, homosexuality plays right into the latest part.

      For a good example of typical Russian paranoia, the type that was common in late 80s and is in vogue again today, read about the Dulles' Plan. Many people still believe that it's real.

    23. Re:Russians, help me understand by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Many people in the West think that Putin is oppressing the democracy-loving Russians

      I don't think that's what most Westerners think. They definitely think that of Kim Jung-Un and most likely Bashar al-Assad, Saddam Hussein was definitely a despot like that, as was Gaddafi. Putin, however... well, most Westerners don't like him, and he certainly enjoys corrupt elections, but everyone knows he's not in power because he oppressed the people. He's in power due to nostalgia for a "strong Russia" (which was mostly smoke and mirrors in the best of times) that could throw its weight around internationally.

    24. Re:Russians, help me understand by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      after US-led coup in Kiev, in which EU also took a role

      Lol, is that seriously what they tell you on Russia Today's propaganda to make you feel better about yourself?

  50. (im)moral imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should try to understand that not all people in the world are like you. People have different sensibilities,
    different values also in what regards the relationships between sexes. To many people around the world it
    seems that America (and the west in general) has long ago lost any moral values it once had. The only
    value you still have is "thou shalt not kill", but also this becomes very flexible as soon you go out of your
    territory.
    So, instead of going bombing or starving people who see things in a different way, just leave them alone,
    and do what you want in your own house without concerning yourself about other people houses.
    It is just none of your buisness.

    1. Re:(im)moral imperialism by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      If your values include oppressing people for what they are, especially if they do nothing that is in any way harmful to your population or country, your values are wrong. Period.

      And yes, that means that the values of the US need some heavy review, too. Didn't say that they were right in any way.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:(im)moral imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ", your values are wrong. Period."

      you may have, and state, whichever opinions you wish about my values. As long as you stay in your house and not trying to get into mine to
      force me to behave as YOU think is correct.

    3. Re:(im)moral imperialism by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So ... oppressing people for what they are, e.g. because they're black, because they're asian, because they're women, because they have the wrong imaginary friend, because they do the wrong kind of work, because ... that's ok?

      Or is that reserved to people who fuck wrong?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will happen if they continue to drive and do not report to the doctor for their driver's license to be removed? Are they "put to sleep" at that point if the argument is they will cause more accidents (aggravating point)?

  52. Russia, country of drunk drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia doesn't stop drunk driving. They encourage it!
    Drink up, comrade! It's Baltika Time!

  53. Re:Homosexuality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    By that measure, being a Slashdot basement dwelling virgin is equally culpable?

  54. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The authors of this law were, it seems to me, (if I can depend on the translation being close to accurate), fairly rigorous in their definitions so as to make it clear that only conditions which actually affect one's ability to drive safely are listed.

    And how exactly is (F64.0) Transsexualism affecting your ability to drive?

  55. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > 5. Personality disorders and behavior in adulthood F60 - F69

    There is is. Have a look at the F codes one by one, then come back. I can make it easier for you. Here they are:

    (F64) Gender identity disorders
    (F64.0) Transsexualism
    (F64.1) Dual-role transvestism
    (F64.2) Gender identity disorder of childhood
    (F65) Disorders of sexual preference
    (F65.0) Sexual fetishism
    (F65.1) Fetishistic transvestism
    (F65.2) Exhibitionism
    (F65.3) Voyeurism
    (F65.4) Paedophilia
    (F65.5) Sadomasochism

  56. Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In next development cycle there will be one more addition to the mental illnesses list which prohibits obtaining driving license:

    It will be "Sluggish schizophrenia/vyalotekushchaya shizofreniya" - conception that people who opposed the s/Soviet/Putin/ regime were mentally sick
    since there was no other logical rationale why one would oppose the sociopolitical system considered the best in the world ....
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sluggish_schizophrenia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

  57. Is looking at porn like voyeurism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because if looking at porn is voyeurism and considered to be a sex disorder, then I am totally in favor of these regulations, and can begin to understand why Snowden likes living in Russia. Now I'm thinking of their safe, traffic-free roads. As a bicyclist this sounds like a great idea!

  58. Pathological stealing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that the entire govenment of the Russian cleptocracy will have to turn in their drivers licence then!

    1. Re:Pathological stealing? by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, our free market capitalist system is much more advanced. The Wall Street cleptocracy already has chauffeurs.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    2. Re:Pathological stealing? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, the professional cleptocrats have chauffeurs, so that problem isn't one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  59. He should be very aware that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Picking it on minorities brings a lot of negative karma and bad luck. Look what happened to Hitler...

    1. Re:He should be very aware that by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      It happened to Hitler not because he killed minorities, but because he was pressed by USA to do as USA wanted. Saddam was the next: beginning with Iran-Iraq war and ending on a rope. I hope History will teach some modern politicians, but she never teaches.

  60. Russian Caviar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gay and I have a right to drive anywhere I want, marry anybody or anything I want, and vocally publicize it 24/365 on Oprah and the Huffington Post!

    Now put something in my butt!

    1. Re:Russian Caviar by neminem · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? You want me to put something in the cloud? What possible relevance does that have to this article? :D

  61. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by phayes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You, and the mods who gave you points, are either ignorant or biased to the point of imbecility.

    Putin has already been clearly shown to use the most tenuous pretexts to use Russia's courts to beat, imprison & kill his opponents. Changing the laws so that the F64 & F65 codes disqualify people from having a drivers license WILL be used.

    Putins goons will stop & strip search critics just as they do now. They'll just replace his underwear with ladies & boom, F65.1: No drivers licence for you, pervert...

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  62. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try reading the actual ICD-codes? Here, if reading comprehension is too hard for you. Source, WHO website. Just google it. To taste, add in homophobic psychiatrists to diagnose gay people with anything under F65, like disorder of sexual preference, not otherwise specified, F65.9. If they want to fly in the face of the ICD-10's actual instructions you can even stick them with something under F66, Psychological and behavioural disorders associated with sexual development and orientation.

    F64 Gender identity disorders
    F64.0 Transsexualism
                    A desire to live and be accepted as a member of the opposite sex, usually accompanied by a sense of discomfort with, or inappropriateness of, one's anatomic sex, and a wish to have surgery and hormonal treatment to make one's body as congruent as possible with one's preferred sex.
    F64.1 Dual-role transvestism
                    The wearing of clothes of the opposite sex for part of the individual's existence in order to enjoy the temporary experience of membership of the opposite sex, but without any desire for a more permanent sex change or associated surgical reassignment, and without sexual excitement accompanying the cross-dressing.
                    Gender identity disorder of adolescence or adulthood, nontranssexual type
                    Excludes: fetishistic transvestism ( F65.1 )
    F64.2 Gender identity disorder of childhood
                    A disorder, usually first manifest during early childhood (and always well before puberty), characterized by a persistent and intense distress about assigned sex, together with a desire to be (or insistence that one is) of the other sex. There is a persistent preoccupation with the dress and activities of the opposite sex and repudiation of the individual's own sex. The diagnosis requires a profound disturbance of the normal gender identity; mere tomboyishness in girls or girlish behaviour in boys is not sufficient. Gender identity disorders in individuals who have reached or are entering puberty should not be classified here but in F66.-.
                    Excludes: egodystonic sexual orientation ( F66.1 )
    sexual maturation disorder ( F66.0 )
    F64.8 Other gender identity disorders
    F64.9 Gender identity disorder, unspecified
                    Gender-role disorder NOS
    Fuck you very much.

  63. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    Having a fetish is a disorder? That's... going to cover a really huge percentage of the human species. Maybe it doesn't count if you don't act on it, but it's still a preference (as in, "Disorders of sexual preference")...

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  64. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Wikipedia:
    (F64) Gender identity disorders
            (F64.0) Transsexualism
            (F64.1) Dual-role transvestism
            (F64.2) Gender identity disorder of childhood
    (F65) Disorders of sexual preference
            (F65.0) Sexual fetishism
            (F65.1) Fetishistic transvestism
            (F65.2) Exhibitionism
            (F65.3) Voyeurism
            (F65.4) Paedophilia
            (F65.5) Sadomasochism
            (F65.6) Multiple disorders of sexual preference
            (F65.8) Other disorders of sexual preference Frotteurism Necrophilia Zoophilia
    (F66) Psychological and behavioural disorders associated with sexual development and orientation
            (F66.0) Sexual maturation disorder
            (F66.1) Ego-dystonic sexual orientation
            (F66.2) Sexual relationship disorder
            (F66.8) Other psychosexual development disorders
            (F66.9) Psychosexual development disorder, unspecified

    Quotes from ICD-10 itself:
    Fetish objects vary in their importance to the individual. In some cases they simply serve to enhance sexual excitement achieved in ordinary ways (e.g. having the partner wear a particular garment).
    Sexual orientation by itself is not to be regarded as a disorder.

    In other words: If you are GAY you may drive. But if you are excited when your wife wears high heels then you are disqualified.

    Full disclosure: I live in Russia.

  65. Re:Homosexuality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Therefore we should also ban neckbeards from driving.

  66. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 0

    Charming. But I'll respond nonetheless...

    Two things:

    1. The relevant law is qualified thusly: "I. Mental and behavioral disorders (in the presence of chronic and prolonged mental disorders with severe persistent or painful symptoms[...])"

    2. WHO, and the ICD-10 isn't Russian. It's an international directive which has classified homosexuality as a mental disorder.

    If the world doesn't like it, then it is quite within the power of the world to change the designation.

    Almost smacks of a bit of "in yer face, you hypocrites" doesn't it? I wonder if that was intentional?

  67. After watching most Russian dash cams.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    They can simplify... Not allowed to drive if Russian or in Russia.

    Everyone over there is utterly insane when behind the wheel.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  68. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 0

    You've been hoodwinked, methinks.

    None of the Western accusations against Putin or Russia have panned out.

    The situation with Ukraine reads like a tragic comedy of public relations errors. Remember when Russia was supposed to have shot down an air liner? Or when they were supposed to have invaded Ukraine? Or how they rigged the referendum in Crimea? (All of which turned out to be provable nonsense.)

    Washington is grasping at straws in their bid to maintain their control of a distant continent. Though I suppose it may still work if enough people continue to buy every hysterical bogus claim floated by the Western media circus.

    In other words, you're aligned with the real goons in this equation. Maybe you should stop and reconsider things from a larger perspective.

  69. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it quite obvious for male to female transformations?

  70. At least it is better than Saudi Arabia. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    There people listed as "female" are not allowed to drive.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:At least it is better than Saudi Arabia. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      How is this "better"? Because the portion of the population being oppressed is smaller?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:At least it is better than Saudi Arabia. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Yes. Even second stage cancer is better than terminal stage. If we think if something is not perfect, it is horrible we would have very tough time negotiating life. My data plan is not perfect, but good enough. My personal life right now is quite bad, but it is still better than the lots of lots[*] people. Even someone who gets diabetes has to think, "at least it is not cancer, with medicine and diet it is controllable".

      [*] first lot=fate, next lot=many

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  71. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Having a fetish is a disorder? That's... going to cover a really huge percentage of the human species. Maybe it doesn't count if you don't act on it, but it's still a preference (as in, "Disorders of sexual preference")...

    While the primary purpose of the ICD is to categories conditions you'd call disease, injury or mental illness, it also has a broad range of other conditions that may cause you to seek healthcare like for example being pregnant, in need of a vaccination or a natrual psychological reaction to a traumatic incident. A sexual fetish isn't necessarily a medical condition, but if you need to see a psychologist about it'll be recorded as such. If you want to get a sex change surgery, then being transgender will probably be listed as the diagnosis. That said, many countries exclude certain codes or code blocks from being used. In many cases they want the same information for statistical purposes though, they just don't call it a disorder.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  72. That is very unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they mainly drove stick in Russia!

  73. Speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it make more sense to look at speed limits? Russia has a city speed limit of 60 km/h and a law stating that you will not be fined unless you exceed the speed limit by at least 20 km/h. This mean people are free to drive through towns at up to 80 km/h without being stopped by the police. Compare this to the 40 or 50 km/h limits in most countries.

    Solving the problem by taking the driving license from mentally ill looks good on paper, but it opens the question what is a mental illness, which is a traffic hazard? Besides it's naive to think people stop driving just because they have no license. This is a serious problem in a lot of countries and I see no reason why it should be any less of a problem in Russia.

    Also a whole lot of Russian cars wouldn't pass a roadworthy safety inspection if they enter western Europe. I assume they wouldn't pass inspection in Russia either, but yet they are still on the roads.

    1. Re:Speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that a man wanting to insert his penis into the anus of another man falls under the aegis of mental illness. It's an unnatural act and only those who would agree with such unnatural behavior would object. Ditto a man wanting to sodomise a woman; it's unnatural.

    2. Re:Speed limits by Cederic · · Score: 1

      It's an unnatural act and only those who would agree with such unnatural behavior would object.

      Wrong, on both counts.

      On the first count, it's a very natural act, with many species anxious to orgasm inside another male.

      On the second count, I don't agree with such behaviour but I don't see it as a mental illness. It's just something that happens.

      Ditto a man wanting to sodomise a woman; it's unnatural.

      Now that is just nonsensical bullshit. That's far too prevalent to be considered unnatural.

    3. Re:Speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that a man wanting to insert his penis into the anus of another man falls under the aegis of mental illness. It's an unnatural act and only those who would agree with such unnatural behavior would object. Ditto a man wanting to sodomise a woman; it's unnatural.

      How is this related to road safety? Mentally ill or not (I will not touch that subject), I would assume that where he wants to put his penis is unrelated to his risk of being involved in a traffic accident.

  74. UBER will still hire them and when something goes by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    UBER will still hire them and when something goes bad uber's insurance can get out of it by saying we don't cover unlicensed drivers.

  75. Re:Homosexuality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also read in a science magazine once that size does matter.

  76. Re:gay people, transgender by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    Hitler executed gays. The percentage of gays in Germany didn't change. I personally believe that the sexual deviation is a genetical NORM, a mechanism that regulates population density, and density is already too high.

  77. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    And yet the russians are using the ICD-10 codes. Quit trying to defend the indefensible.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  78. russia vs Western fakeLeftist Multiculturalism by leftistconservative · · Score: 1

    good for them

  79. Does the drivers handbook come with... by Afty0r · · Score: 1

    Does the drivers handbook come with a list of sanctioned positions? Like a mini Kama Sutra along with some instructions about reverse parking?

  80. The moronic ex-KGB thug in the Kremlin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual, coming up with harebrained schemes. This guy is nothing but an obsolete relic of the Cold War.

  81. Re:Homosexuality by voss · · Score: 1

    Also having childless aunts and uncles would reduce infant mortality...

  82. Re:Homosexuality by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And in some cases (like yours) this would actually be a very beneficial effect.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  83. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see this being put to the test with some high ranking politicians, preferably of conservative parties, being yanked their licenses.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  84. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    But if you are excited when your wife wears high heels then you are disqualified.

    Not defending it or anything but... how are they going to find out? Are they combing your internet accounts for this sort of thing, or is it based on medical records? Does anyone go to the hospital for their high-heel fetish? What about patient-doctor confidentiality? If I were Russian, and confided in my shrink that I had a fetish that was bothering me because I was otherwise an upstanding, hard working, God-fearing, citizen who paid taxes... would the government eventually find out about that? Are your psychiatrists compromised? Do they have to report this sort of thing?

    There's a lot of unanswered questions... even the article says the thing is vague. But the purpose of the thing is pretty clear. I imagine everyone is more or less safe provided they stop talking about politics and at least try to conform. The measure's purpose is to punish the outspoken activists. If you don't cause any fuss and you at least pretend to be a Christian and straight, and act hateful towards gays and the West, you'll be okay. Your reputation will go untarnished, provided you continue to pretend to fit in with, and possibly support the status-quo. Obedience will be rewarded by granting you permission to continue living an uncontroversial, uninterrupted, life. In that way, the measure is genius. The vagueness promotes fear, and fear promotes compliance. You don't know where you might trip up.

    I honestly have no idea how one would combat that sort of thing. It seems like your only choice is to wait for Putin to die of old age, to move, or to get violent. My condolences for your trouble. It makes any issues I worry about in America pale in comparison.

  85. dont lie. it is not "purchase", it is always"gift" by user.aaaaa · · Score: 0

    yyy

  86. use word GULAG - Gay Lesbian Animalist Gloomy by user.aaaaa · · Score: 0

    U for Unspecified

  87. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    2. WHO, and the ICD-10 isn't Russian. It's an international directive which has classified homosexuality as a mental disorder.

    No, it doesn't. Have you actually looked at it? Look at the appropriate sections (F64, F65 and F66). Homosexuality is not there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  88. Re:Only Queers Care by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Because freedom is always the freedom of the other one. True freedom does not discriminate between what I like and what I don't care about. And the elimination of freedoms always affects you in one way or another.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  89. I self-identify as a back seat driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you drive past a quite mysterious looking elderly MtF Transvestite from Pakistan who moons you from the car window?
    Presents an uncanny Pakistani tranny granny fanny, if you will. /deep thoughts

    1. Re:I self-identify as a back seat driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit I LOLed!

  90. Re:Homosexuality by tehcyder · · Score: 2
    Summary from the linked article:

    Altogether, these data support an X-linked multi-locus sexually antagonistic hypothesis rather than an autosomal multi-locus overdominance hypothesis.

    tl;dr having a gay grandad makes women more fertile

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  91. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At best, it's fucking stupid.

    At worst, it's to selectively crush anyone who presents political opposition.

    In any case, as with most of Russia's history, the phrase "and then, it gets worse" applies...

  92. USA Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Russian colleagues - you have my sympathy as you slide down the slippery slope of "oh fuck, we're fucked."

    Hot on your heels though, are our US colleagues.

  93. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel sorry for you that you live in such a retarded, backwards country, being run by a madman with delusions of bringing back the Soviet Union of old through conquest. Wouldn't at all be surprised if he thinks he's the reincarnation of Stalin or something. With shit like what's going on in the world today it's no wonder that advanced alien civilizations won't contact us openly, we're just fucking stupid-ass animals still. Maybe in another 10000 years, if we haven't nuked ourselves in one way or another..

  94. Re:Homosexuality by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    The same is true of masturbation, but it doesn't stop you from doing it.

  95. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Wow a Putin apologist. Who knew he had so many fans...

  96. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by RoLi · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Basically the Russians were greeted with open arms in Crimea, there was not a single death during that "invasion".

    Compare that to the mess of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc.

    But maybe that is the problem the Americans have with Crimea. They only stop nagging and criticizing when the country is in ruin and blood runs in the streets. They would love to drop some bombs on Crimea to show those bastards good old democracy.

  97. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Having a fetish is a disorder?

    An actual fetish? Certainly. Having associated something external with sex to the point that sexual feelings are impossible without that item is pretty much a disorder and is what a fetish is. Being turned on by something, using something to increase sexual feelings, and liking to dress in leather or participate in games, is not really a fetish if you can sexual gratification without them.

  98. Fetishism, exhibitionism and voyeurism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those pictures of Putin without a shirt:

    Hnnnngggghhhh!

  99. I get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're trying to create a slave/subservient class system in Russia.

    This in fact is what we do here in the USA with out drug laws and racism.

    Do they have private prisons yet?

  100. gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    If we can't make the mind match the body, let's make the body match the mind. And once it's treated (one or more of hormones, surgery, therapy) then they're no longer dysphoric.

    Here's the problem. We can't make the body match the mind. We literally cannot do it. We don't have the technology. The very best we can do is a skin-deep, non-functional mask.

    For instance, if you're male, we can lop off the genitals that grew naturally; we can probably dig a pit into your groin; we can plastic up some lippy-looking things to go around it; we might even be able to leave enough of your penis to kinda-sorta give you a little stimulation where the clitoris raises its cute little head. We can't give you an actual clitoris, though. We can insert stuff in your chest to give you breast-like bumps -- which will not, of course, actually be breasts -- and you can cover all this with makeup, dresses, and so on until you may even be able to fool some of the onlooker's eyes.

    At the end of this process, though, even with the most successful results, you're not a woman, not female in any way. You're a man with surgical modifications. You're not going to have periods. You cannot bear children. You will not lubricate correctly. You won't share the same disease risks, and you won't share the same disease immunities. Your chromosome configuration will be wrong. Your pheromone emissions will be off. Your sweat will smell wrong. Your skeletal structure will be wrong. Your walk will be wrong, because your pelvic geometry is different. Even your mind, identity crisis and all, probably won't work even remotely like a woman's actually does -- likely you will continue short on multitasking and long on aggression, among many other things.

    Don't get me wrong -- if you want to do all this to yourself, I'm all for it. It's your body, by all means, hack away and have fun. If you want to change yourself so you appear as alien or predator or Hillary Clinton or a hobbit or a pony, it's all good, have at it and I truly hope you can get as close as possible to the appearance of the thing you're trying to impersonate so you can enjoy the pretense as fully as possible. Acting is often its own reward, as many actors will tell you right up front.

    For the case of a man trying to impersonate a woman, I wouldn't be offended in the least if you managed to carry off that impersonation well enough to coax me, a rather profoundly heterosexual individual, into a sexual interest -- but once I discovered you were actually a guy, I would disengage, simply because I'm not interested in men. And you're still a man. Wearing a mask doesn't make you the thing the mask represents, and that's all body mods and hormone shots accomplish -- they create a mask. It'd be exactly the same if the identity you desire to present is that of a pony; even with the most radical surgeries and prosthetic devices, no matter how accurate the resulting look is, you will never, ever, be a pony. You're a male human with body mods. No more; no less.

    Gender is not something we can change at this time, and the not-very-close series of surgical modifications that create a gender mask is not a path that's even in the same direction of desiring to be the other gender. You can cut, chop, filet and drug yourself until you run out of money, and at the end of the day, you're still just the same guy -- you just look different. The problem is that no matter how much you like to wear a mask, and no matter how good the mask is, you are not the mask.

    What the present amalgam of surgical and pharmaceutical procedures accomplishes is not a sex change. The best description of it I've heard thus far is these procedures result in the provision of a full body mask, within which you can act like you are the being that the mask presents to the viewer. And while that may be very enjoyable for you, it's still an act; you are still 100% male. A cat in a dog suit is still a cat. A human male modified to look exactly lik

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If we can't make the mind match the body, let's make the body match the mind. And once it's treated (one or more of hormones, surgery, therapy) then they're no longer dysphoric.

      Here's the problem. We can't make the body match the mind. We literally cannot do it. We don't have the technology. The very best we can do is a skin-deep, non-functional mask.

      For instance, if you're male, we can lop off the genitals that grew naturally; we can probably dig a pit into your groin; we can plastic up some lippy-looking things to go around it; we might even be able to leave enough of your penis to kinda-sorta give you a little stimulation where the clitoris raises its cute little head. We can't give you an actual clitoris, though.

      Non-functional? 85% of male-to-female transsexuals are fully orgasmic. That's better than genetic women. Yes, the orgasm is different - it's better :-)

      As for the clitoris, both the female clitoris and the male penis start out as the same organ in the fetus.

      Also, estrogen (usually in the form of estradiol) promotes breast growth.

      You're a man with surgical modifications. You're not going to have periods. You cannot bear children. You will not lubricate correctly.

      There are plenty of genetic women who no longer have periods, and cannot bear children. Are you going to claim they're not women based on that criteria?

      As for lubrication, there's a surgical technique that uses a portion of donor tissue from another site in the patient to allow them to lubricate, but most don't opt for it. And there are plenty of women who don't lubricate, no matter how much they're stimulated.

      You won't share the same disease risks, and you won't share the same disease immunities. Your chromosome configuration will be wrong. Your pheromone emissions will be off. Your sweat will smell wrong.

      Estrogen provides the same protection from diseases in both transsexuals and genetic women. And with the removal of testosterone, the sweat smells the same as a genetic woman (actually, because there's less testosterone floating around in a transsexual woman than a genetic woman, we actually smell better). I noticed my dogs became more protective because I smelled different.

      Your skeletal structure will be wrong. Your walk will be wrong, because your pelvic geometry is different

      My walk is just fine according to all the genetic women I know (and the men who have hit on me must think the same way).

      It's not a question of "wearing a mask." The "mask" was trying to live as something I felt I was not. You need to realize that gender identity is not sexual identity. And there are hundreds of thousands of us for whom this is the right thing to do. Plus, legally, it DOES change our sex, so since we don't live in isolation on a desert island, this allows us easier social interaction.

      Even your mind, identity crisis and all, probably won't work even remotely like a woman's actually does -- likely you will continue short on multitasking and long on aggression, among many other things.

      All I can say for that is [citation required]. I've never been "short on multitasking and long on aggression." But thanks for continuing to reinforce gender stereotypes. I'm sure there are many people (of both genders) who would disagree your statement.

      Look, I'm just trying to get you to see that gender is more than XX or XY. Talk to a few of us, and our friends, and you might be pleasantly surprised to find that you don't have to continue to discriminate between "real women" and "transsexual women."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      Transgendered women are not "men trying to impersonate women," and your comments about aliens and hobbits are insulting and you know it.

      This is a hugely privileged and willfully ignorant gender-essentialist rant.

    3. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Transgendered women are not "men trying to impersonate women,"

      An absolutely fact-free claim. Back it up or be ignored.

      your comments about aliens and hobbits are insulting and you know it.

      Your inability or unwillingness to deal with the comparison speaks not at all to any worthwhile counterpoint. It is not an insult to draw accurate comparisons or invoke appropriate metaphor. It is, however, of no service whatsoever to your POV to go whining about it instead of addressing it head-on; you have not established in any way or form that those comparisons were inaccurate or inappropriate. Much less "insulting." Someone interested in masquerading as the Predator would consider your remarks both insensitive and thoughtless -- and they'd be right. There's nothing about gender masquerade that makes it superior to any other type of masquerade.

      This is a hugely privileged and willfully ignorant gender-essentialist rant.

      I brought numerous facts and contentions to the discussion. You have brought nothing other than a monumentally pathetic attempt to disrespect me through labeling. If you want to actually discuss the issues at hand, I'll engage. If all you have to offer is "nuh-uh, meanie!" then you will simply be ignored.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Non-functional? 85% of male-to-female transsexuals are fully orgasmic.

      I wasn't talking about the presence of orgasms. One certainly hopes that isn't lost. Sorry to hear about the other 15%. I was talking about the nature of the orgasms, the female organs, cycles, musculature, nervous system, skeletal geometry and so forth. You know, the uterus, the ovaries, the vagina (no, a carved out hole is not the same as the actual topology and musculature and reflexive nature of a vagina and associated internal bits), the clitoris (no, a stub of a penis is not the same as a clitoris, not even close) particular flexibilities, etc.

      As for the clitoris, both the female clitoris and the male penis start out as the same organ in the fetus.

      Yes, and we start out with tails, too. But as we develop, things go quite differently for the two sexes. Again, the penis does not equate to a clitoris. No matter what you do with, or to it. Delusions otherwise notwithstanding. Even you were to magically skip my that, the male orgasm is different in nature from the female orgasm in several obvious ways (duration, intensity, repeatability, muscular response [men don't even have some of those muscles], and frankly, I suspect the two are different in many non-obvious ways as well, based on my own personal observations and explorations.

      There are plenty of genetic women who no longer have periods, and cannot bear children. Are you going to claim they're not women based on that criteria?

      No. If a person's body was genetically built as a woman, they still think as women do, they still are structured biologically as women, and they are still functional as women. Just as changes to your body can't change you from being a man, changes to their bodies can't change them from being a woman. It doesn't come down to one or two issues. Not even close.

      As for lubrication, there's a surgical technique that uses a portion of donor tissue from another site in the patient to allow them to lubricate, but most don't opt for it. And there are plenty of women who don't lubricate, no matter how much they're stimulated.

      You're confusing the natural lubrication the nervous system drives with an artificial source hooked to entirely different plumbing; consider that surgically relocating a tooth in your anus doesn't make it a mouth. As for women who don't lubricate, that's irrelevant. The biology -- nerves, glands, musculature, spinal and brain nervous system components -- is either there, or they're (unfortunately) damaged or have been altered. Now, OTOH, if they simply don't lubricate, but can, that's more a matter of not being fired up, and is no reflection upon their femininity -- it's just an expression of lack of arousal (and the partner takes the heat for that one.) The idea of a fully functional woman as contrasted with one that isn't fully functional still covers a spectrum of woman-to-woman. There's no point in that spectrum where she would change into a man because "just one more thing" had ceased functioning. Same thing the other way. There's no point in a spectrum of losing external male characteristics or artificially altered hormone balance that somehow changes everything else from nervous system to skeleton to muscular arrangement that can make one actually become a woman.

      Estrogen provides the same protection from diseases in both transsexuals and genetic women.

      Prostate cancer. Uterine cancer. Ovarian cancer. Penile cancer. Breast cancer. And related. You can't suffer from vaginal cancer because you don't have a vagina. A woman can't suffer from penile cancer because she doesn't have a penis. And so on. So no, the disease vulnerabilities of the sexes are not equal, and do not shift magically from one to the other with the surgeons knife or

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If we transplant a woman's heart to you, you're still a male. If you lose all your limbs and we replace them with a woman's limbs, you are still a male. If we replace every single organ in your body with those from a woman except the brain, you're still a male. If we nuked your bone marrow and replaced it with a woman's, you're still male, even though a blood test would now say you're female.

      In fact, if one day we took a man's brain and transplanted it into a woman's body, they would still insist that they are male. What counts is what's between the ears, not what's between the legs. And postmortems show that what's between a male-to-female transsexuals ears is closer to a genetic female than a genetic male. It's not a "masquerade", no matter how much it challenges your idea of how things should be.

      This is why giving estrogen to Alan Turing to "treat his being gay" didn't work - he was male in both mind and body. It's also why attempts to treat m2f transsexuals with testosterone mostly ended up in suicide or jail. The brain is the fundamental organ of our existence. It defines who and what we are.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by Caspian · · Score: 1

      SOMEONE'S a trans person in denial.

      Also an asshole.

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    7. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      In fact, if one day we took a man's brain and transplanted it into a woman's body, they would still insist that they are male

      Again, it isn't about what you insist upon. It is about what you are. If you want to go whole-hog reductionist as in your first paragraph, I'll go right along with you -- and I maintain that if they transplanted your own personal brain into a purely female body otherwise, you'd still be a man. You didn't form as a female, your brain did not canalize under the conditions of being female, your brain isn't hooked to, nor does it have the networks required to manage, the various female glands and other system controls; you didn't go through female adolescence, during the development of your brain you were in the wrong bathrooms and locker rooms and so forth; and your thought patterns and ability to multitask didn't receive the development guidance that would give you the many-challenges-at-once competence females exhibit casually and constantly, because it is inherent to their makeup. You're still a fellow in a lady suit.

      It would have to be much more than a transplant. Your brain would have to be physically reconfigured into a female model, in no way different from any other female. That would require not only change in configuration, but implantation of new knowledge, skills, reflexes, glandular controls and so on. We may be able to do that someday, but we're not even close now.

      What counts is what's between the ears,

      This -- when we're talking about perception of ourselves -- represents a basic misunderstanding and misrepresentation of reality. Born human, if you think you're a pony -- with every fiber and pathway of your mind -- you're still not a pony. If you think you are a rock, and I mean utterly convinced in every possible way... you still aren't a rock. If you think you are a magician, or a god, or an elf it doesn't matter even one little bit. You aren't; you never will be; you never were. You're still you, and what that is, is whatever you were born as. You're still exactly that. Just older and considerably more interesting consequent to education and experience.

      This is why giving estrogen to Alan Turing to "treat his being gay" didn't work - he was male in both mind and body. It's also why attempts to treat m2f transsexuals with testosterone mostly ended up in suicide or jail. The brain is the fundamental organ of our existence. It defines who and what we are.

      The reason treating Turing with hormones didn't work is because the idea is monumentally stupid. They thought estrogen would "neutralize libido", and the reason they thought that is because they were unscientific, bumbling fools in the grip of religiously inspired application of tyranny, inculcation of insecurity, and an inexcusable ignorance of sexuality in general. There was never any compelling evidence for such an assertion, nor, for that matter, was there ever a sane reason or excuse to treat Turing as he was treated that rises above the standard of "redneck fucktard", albeit rednecks with lovely English accents. Just more destructive, evil behavior directly attributable to religious fanaticism. I can imagine no punishment adequate to address their contemptible and malicious actions.

      The brain is the fundamental organ of our existence. It defines who and what we are.

      I agree. But it does so by means nowhere near as simplistic as today's decision to put on a dress. The physical configuration, chromosomal configuration, topological organization, network distribution and tasking, skill sets and experiences that move the brain along the developmental path from comparatively blank slate at birth to formed human being all have their part in creating a female brain. If the biology is originally male, at least at this point in our scientific development, it's game over and that's your only prize: You're a male.

      Doesn't mean you can't spend all your time, bar none, at trying to wrap yourself around an attempt to be female; or that doing so is in any way "wrong"; it just means you can't get there. Yet, anyway.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Yawn.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an online stalker harasser (being exposed for it) no matter what you do http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... serves you right, sockpuppeteering troll that you are!

    10. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You completely missed my point. What's between the ears is what defines us, and no amount of transplants will change that. And that the tests that have been done on m2f transsexuals show that the structure and function of the brain is closer to female than male. It can't be changed to be male, so why not just adapt the body to what is really inside the brain? After all, our best guess at this point is that we are born this way (one gene that fails to react to testosterone properly at certain stages of the development of the fetus) and, as you point out, that is a big part of what creates a female brain.

      The default configuration of the human is female. Without testosterone producing effects at very specific times, the brain doesn't masculinize. This leads to brains that are closer to female than male, and some of these can be observed in post-mortems. You might no like it, but that's the way it is. All those complaints about "female brain trapped in a male body" actually have a biological basis.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like this is a genetic error during gestation "The default configuration of the human is female. Without testosterone producing effects at very specific times, the brain doesn't masculinize. This leads to brains that are closer to female than male, and some of these can be observed in post-mortems. You might no like it, but that's the way it is. All those complaints about "female brain trapped in a male body" actually have a biological basis." by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Saturday January 10, 2015 @11:20AM (#48781259) ?

    12. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      We know that at least one gene controlling the ability to use testosterone is slightly longer than it should be, so the "key doesn't fit the lock" at all times during gestation. The body recovers later on, but it's too late for the brain to be fully masculinized. The 12th week is critical.

      We also see other physical consequences beyond the brain. The 2d4d digit ratio (the difference between the length of the index finger vs. the ring finger) is also controlled by prenatal testosterone. Men generally have a ring finger longer than their index finger. Women generally have the reverse - the index finger is either the same length or longer than the ring finger. Many m2f transsexuals, such as myself, have the female configuration.

      So we don't even have to wait until we die to have someone open up our brain and look - we can see the physical consequences just by looking at our hands.

      And then there's women who have AIS or CAIS. They often only find out that their genes are XY when they fail to have a period. Only an idiot would call them men.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BarbaraHudson, what's this about you ac stalking/harassing & libeling others http://slashdot.org/comments.p... then you had to eat your words for it?

    14. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem. We can't make the body match the mind. We literally cannot do it. We don't have the technology.

      As long as transsexuals are well-informed about what can and cannot be done, I don't see a problem.

      I see SRS as one of many possible ways of addressing gender dysphoria at the individual level. Like most other treatments, it may fail to succeed at this aim. That's not a reason to rule it out.

      I also think it can and should be addressed at the societal level, by making it more "normal". But I think LGBT activists in general overestimate how much of the T's pains can be alleviated this way.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      You expressed a bunch of ignorant opinions. They're not "facts" if you don't actually make reference to anything ... and comparing someone's gender to "masquerading as the Predator" is insulting.

      Fuck you, dude.

    16. Re:gender+surgery+drugs still=gender by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      Your problem is that you're obsessed with the idea that gender = physical sex. Your entire post is about physicality, especially surgical modifications. Gender is a social construct. Your gender expression is determined by culture and conditioning ... not your genitals.

  101. Taboos by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Remember that there's a reason that something is a taboo.

    And in turn, you should remember that these reasons are not always sound.

    Defy Invalid Social Norms

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  102. It helps when it is properly hyphenated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I'd be a better driver with my wanker removed. "Distractuious" women have caused most of my near misses.

    Hopefully you mean 'near hits' because a near miss would just be a hit.

    It was a miss, that was very, nearly a hit.

    Q: What kind of miss was it?
    A; A near-miss

    It helps when it is properly hyphenated.

    1. Re: It helps when it is properly hyphenated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never thought about the hyphen being used to clarify. Lots of other "near __" expressions mean "almost __" unless it's clearly referring to distance in the literal sense. Examples: near failure means almost a total failure, but a near target is a close-by target.

  103. You got beat up for trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why're ya avoiding & downmodding this Barb http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' you can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  104. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why're ya avoiding & downmodding this Barb http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' you can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  105. Your problem's you're a troll & sockpuppeteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why're ya avoiding & downmodding this Barb http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' you can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  106. You get them cuz you troll & sockpuppet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why're ya avoiding & downmodding this Barb http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' you can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  107. Can you bear a child? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Why'd ya avoid & downmod this http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? You troll apk http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... n' can't back it up? Yes. As to your character, & being a troll? Look no farther than YOUR OWN WORDS quoted as you stalk apk + how you do it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so keep downmodding this. I'll run you and your sockpuppets dry of them and we all see it anyway (since everyone here reads below the default moderation threshold that sockpuppeteers like you cheat, or aren't these your accounts you used concurrently to mod yourself up for your crap posts and to mod down anyone that gets the better of your dumb ass: BarbaraHudson http://slashdot.org/~BarbaraHu... = TomHudson http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson... = Barbara, not Barbie http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2... (THESE LAST 2 SHE KEPT ACTIVE @ THE SAME TIME BEFORE HE/SHE WAS BANNED HERE FOR A YEAR SHE/HE USED TO MOD UP HER/HIS OWN BS POSTS, & DOWNMOD OTHERS THAT GET THE BETTER OF HIM/HER))

  108. I wish the USA had the balls to implement this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I am concerned tranny's suffer from a mental illness. so that being said they shouldn't drive a motor vehicle.

  109. PES 2015 free download full game by SaifUllah4418 · · Score: 1

    PES 2015 free download full game Description Interface language: Russian / English Audio language: English System Req :- Windows 8.1 / 8/7 SP1 / panorama SP2 Processor: Intel Core two pair / AMD Athlon X2 240 one.8 GHz RAM: 1 GB NVidia GeForce 7800 / ATI Radeon X1300 / Intel HD Graphics 2000 or higher Free house on hard disc space: ~ seven.5 GB click to this link: https://www.facebook.com/pages...

  110. Unsurprisingly... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Sobriety was a listed mental disorder in Russia, there is a well known oral treatment however...

  111. So, if i believe the russian government.... by drolli · · Score: 1

    And assume that these two things are related, and knowing that Russia has an extreme amount of accidents, i assume that can only mean that the Russians have an extreme amount of sex disorders.

    I mean, I would have guessed other things-like alkoholism, bad roads, cars in bad technical state, and cultural deficits in estimating risks, but, ok , i the russian government says that all these accidents are related to sexual disorders, i guess i have to take the extreme perversion troughout russian society for granted......

  112. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    The situation with Ukraine reads like a tragic comedy of public relations errors. Remember when Russia was supposed to have shot down an air liner? Or when they were supposed to have invaded Ukraine? Or how they rigged the referendum in Crimea? (All of which turned out to be provable nonsense.)

    That is kinda funny, cause there were sat photos of the first that were released to the press
    The second, more sat photos in the press
    The third, Putin himself admitted.

    You have shown yourself to be someone who lies, now get off my internet.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  113. Read the qualifier by nsushkin · · Score: 1

    Section I of the counterindications to driving has a qualifier that those disorders counter-indicate driving only if they have major and frequent symptoms, so there is some wiggle room. Otherwise, it's a page straight out of Nazi playbook of discrimination against gay and disabled.

  114. I agree with Russia. by norteo · · Score: 1

    I agree with Russia. My wifi linux driver definetively has a sex disorder and I am getting really tired of it...

  115. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by blankinthefill · · Score: 1

    There is quite a difference between a fetish as the internet defines it and a fetish as it is described in the DSM. In the most basic terms, if you can get off without the help of your 'fetish' then it is almost certainly not a fetish as defined by the DSM.

  116. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes sense. Ppl with sex disorders shouldn't drive.

  117. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you'll not be happy driving in the same lane as everyone else ?

    captcha: recast

  118. BarbaraHudson, you started up with apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't harass apk 1st (see link) & you wouldn't have problem http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... since you always start up with apk. That's a fact we can all see easily. Your attempts at twisting things never works out for you along with your multiple sockpuppet accounts use http://slashdot.org/comments.p... for trolling others downmodding them when they get the best of you and upmodding your own often partial quote bs. You fail.

  119. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oligarchs drive YOU!

    But seriously, anyone in Putin's Oligarch gang can do whatever the hell they want, whenever the hell they want, and no one will say nyet. And all of his pals have the same middle name: Vladimir.

  120. Re:Homosexuality by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    More like a gay-children-having grandmother.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  121. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

    Whups. You're right. Homosexuality is not on the list. My mistake.

    So if you're gay, the Russian state isn't trying to take away your driver's license.

    Thank-you for the clarification.

  122. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by phayes · · Score: 1

    Putin's logic: I walk into your house, put a gun to your head and then screw your wife = consensual sex.

    Then we get apologists like you claiming "she wanted it".

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  123. Re:Homosexuality by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    So far as I know, there has been some additional evidence lending credence to kin selection / altruism hypothesis, as well. And I know that such has been established pretty definitively for some other species.

  124. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as a "conservative" party in Russia, really. The ruling party is rather populist if anything, they can change their take on things on a moment's notice.

  125. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonanonaon · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's actually about as close to completely backwards as you're likely to get.

    Ukraine is currently ruled by murderous thugs. Actual Nazis. -Self-described, mind you. Take a look at how Ukraine's sitting government deals with those who disagree with it. (Warning; extremely disturbing images).

    Ukraine is bankrupt and the infrastructure is currently rated as being worse than Palestine, (as hard to imagine as that may be), but that's what you get when psychopaths take control of a country.

    -That's the government which was installed by and is being supported by the West. Remember the leaked phone call between Nuland and Pyatt where they discussed installing Yatsenyuk as prime minister? -A massive revelation, though the press artfully focused its attention on the 'outrage' that somebody said, "Fuck the EU" in the message rather than on the mind-blowing fact that US power players were talking about casually by-passing a foreign nation's democratic processes to install their preferred leader. -Which they bloody-well did!

    Crimea was very happy to get the hell away from that luncay, from psychopathic rule, fear of their own government and starvation during the Winter months. Luckily, Russia hasn't entirely left Ukraine to blow in the wind as they've been sending regular convoys of relief supplies to the stricken populace. (Much to the West's dismay.)

    That's a taste of the real world which lives beyond the propaganda machine which would have you believe that up is down and evil is good.

  126. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when a state is under the control of a very small number of powerful people.

    Good thing that'll never happen here!

  127. Re:Homosexuality by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "passing on good genes" has been out of fashion in society for.. well, almost as long as there has been society.

  128. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    "Remember when Russia was supposed to have shot down an air liner?"

    That is kinda funny, cause there were sat photos of the first that were released to the press

    Wait, but I thought a Russian general said that the missile was shown as being Ukrainian. Did he mis-speak?

  129. Re:Here it is. Hope you can read Russian. Re:sourc by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    This story really isn't complete without APK.