Sony's W600/800i/900i is what something you might want to look at and will be exactly what Apple will be shooting for. Sony's got the leg up right now and they're excellent units.
yes, because YOU can't tell the difference it automatically makes THEM stupid. i'd like to see these bitrates that were tested, buddy. so how about that link.
Why are you "removing layers upon layers" when you should be rebuilding their pc's. If they are saving things on the local drive and not the network drive(s), this will teach them to be more careful when they suddenly find themselves with a newly "built" pc in the morning.
In a environment with 150+ pc's, we don't have time to be addressing issues like that. Swap with a new build and rebuild the infected machine.
What does this have to do with the article again?:/
Sony wasn't claiming "first cell phone to playback.mp3's", so I'm not sure what angle you're driving at. They might be "later" to the party than N-Gage or the Treo, but it's quite a bit smaller than those bricks you two have. IIRC, you guys don't have Bluetooth either.
you're spot on, man. i love the band of goons waiting to jump on the bandwagon.
now, if there were several reviews with these "symptoms", then sure, laff all you want. the rest of you funboys need to put it back in your pants.
"A second or two"... something that was reported by the paparazzi? LOL. so accurate.
I'm not saying the car has nothing to do with winning obviously, but there isn't a driver on the current circuit that is a technically better and a smarter driver than Michael Schumacher.
Let's get our country to get back to speaking English first. Once companies stop conforming to the Spanish-only speaking "citizens", then we could implement your idea, because i think it's a good one.
no such thing. as a few people have already pointed out, it's for converting an ALREADY multichannelled source to.mp3 multichannel. you can't take a two channel.mp3 and magically convert it to 5.1.
..if you were about to rip a new song, and you had the option of using the surround codec or the normal codec, wouldn't most of you choose the surround codec (esp for some of those great 70's and 80's bands that really took advantage of surround sound)?
i'm not understanding why you would choose surround sound instead of 2 channel especially when it wasn't recorded that way. gimmicky at best. 70's and 80's bands that took advantage of surround sound? i don't recall any. quad-channel and surround are totally different.
..but i think SACD and DVD-Audio do support surround sound so that's always an option for using this and maintaining the surround sound in the encoded format
yes, they do support surround, but you have to remember that most people that purchase SACD/DVD-Audio discs are at least audio enthusiasts and will surely not listen to compressed surround material. and unlike two-channel, where you can listen to music passively, you have to stay put to thoroughly enjoy multi-channel surround.
Alternatively, perhaps I decided not to buy a DVD player (because of the aforementioned problems) but received one as a gift.
then your friends are cheap.
I don't care why they are there. I find them intensely annoying and have no desire to watch an industry's enforced propaganda
still a weak argument against a totally superior format.
No, I don't generally eat poptarts -- they are junk food.
your sarcasm meter broke.
You obviously don't care about video quality, nor do you care about the audio portion of it. Bush dvd player? you get what you pay for.
considering the amount of piracy, the copyright notices are there for a reason. you're in THAT much of a hurry that you can't look at that for, what, 5 seconds? i bet you nuke your poptarts because "you don't have time to cook."
Slashdot Mirror
um, you can do that with msn messenger.
Sony's W600/800i/900i is what something you might want to look at and will be exactly what Apple will be shooting for. Sony's got the leg up right now and they're excellent units.
"stupid audiophiles" :dork:
yes, because YOU can't tell the difference it automatically makes THEM stupid. i'd like to see these bitrates that were tested, buddy. so how about that link.
it's nougat, not chocolate core. >:E
oh, you mean to say "no geeks shop target for the latest games/gear". yeah, you're probably right. other than that, it's very well shopped.
"options>advanced>software update>check now" kinda makes it not-so-automatic, now doesn't it?
the rivals include FM because IPOD's line doesn't have that option. how is that hard to comprehend?
"i haven't bought a single cd since 1999 when i started using napster."
*golf clap*
Why are you "removing layers upon layers" when you should be rebuilding their pc's. If they are saving things on the local drive and not the network drive(s), this will teach them to be more careful when they suddenly find themselves with a newly "built" pc in the morning. In a environment with 150+ pc's, we don't have time to be addressing issues like that. Swap with a new build and rebuild the infected machine. What does this have to do with the article again? :/
Sony wasn't claiming "first cell phone to playback .mp3's", so I'm not sure what angle you're driving at. They might be "later" to the party than N-Gage or the Treo, but it's quite a bit smaller than those bricks you two have. IIRC, you guys don't have Bluetooth either.
welcome to last year.
" That does not make sense! "
It makes total sense. Check the size of the lips on those Ewoks.
what's even more special is that you didn't HEAR anything.
uh huh. then you woke up and the bed was all wet.
I'm gonna be skeered once Alaska decides to build a superhighway :\
They're not, he's just pulling your chain.
you're spot on, man. i love the band of goons waiting to jump on the bandwagon.
now, if there were several reviews with these "symptoms", then sure, laff all you want.
the rest of you funboys need to put it back in your pants.
"A second or two"... something that was reported by the paparazzi? LOL. so accurate. I'm not saying the car has nothing to do with winning obviously, but there isn't a driver on the current circuit that is a technically better and a smarter driver than Michael Schumacher.
Let's get our country to get back to speaking English first. Once companies stop conforming to the Spanish-only speaking "citizens", then we could implement your idea, because i think it's a good one.
"Please press 1 for English"?? F*ck off.
i can agree with that. but when someone says "portable player", you and i know they didn't mean car audio.
Very handy if you want to take your entire DVD audio collection with you on a portable player.
how does this make compressed multichannel "handy" when you're going to listen through headphones?
no such thing. as a few people have already pointed out, it's for converting an ALREADY multichannelled source to .mp3 multichannel. you can't take a two channel .mp3 and magically convert it to 5.1.
..if you were about to rip a new song, and you had the option of using the surround codec or the normal codec, wouldn't most of you choose the surround codec (esp for some of those great 70's and 80's bands that really took advantage of surround sound)?
..but i think SACD and DVD-Audio do support surround sound so that's always an option for using this and maintaining the surround sound in the encoded format
i'm not understanding why you would choose surround sound instead of 2 channel especially when it wasn't recorded that way. gimmicky at best. 70's and 80's bands that took advantage of surround sound? i don't recall any. quad-channel and surround are totally different.
yes, they do support surround, but you have to remember that most people that purchase SACD/DVD-Audio discs are at least audio enthusiasts and will surely not listen to compressed surround material. and unlike two-channel, where you can listen to music passively, you have to stay put to thoroughly enjoy multi-channel surround.
Alternatively, perhaps I decided not to buy a DVD player (because of the aforementioned problems) but received one as a gift.
then your friends are cheap.
I don't care why they are there. I find them intensely annoying and have no desire to watch an industry's enforced propaganda
still a weak argument against a totally superior format.
No, I don't generally eat poptarts -- they are junk food.
your sarcasm meter broke.
You obviously don't care about video quality, nor do you care about the audio portion of it. Bush dvd player? you get what you pay for. considering the amount of piracy, the copyright notices are there for a reason. you're in THAT much of a hurry that you can't look at that for, what, 5 seconds? i bet you nuke your poptarts because "you don't have time to cook."