Slashdot Mirror


Trillian 3.0 Released

Octagon Most writes "Cerulean Studios has released Trillian Pro 3.0 which is still interacting with AIM, Yahoo, MSN instant messagers with impunity. It has a cool new Instant Lookup feature which links to Wikipedia, and a serverless messaging mode using Rendezvous. The free version is now Trillian Basic 3.0. Trillian is still Windows only, and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know."

392 comments

  1. Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform supp by sjrstory · · Score: 3, Informative

    I like Trillian, it has a lot of nice features and looks pretty. However I switched to gaim because of it's cross platform support.

  2. Wait, so how much did this ad cost? by floW+enoL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nt = no text

  3. Hmmm... by dingletec · · Score: 1, Informative

    The serverless messaging sounds nice, but for Linux there are already a few multi-network clients. I remember Trillian as being a bit bloated, but that was several years ago. It was cool, though, as it was the first client I had heard of to use all major services.

    --
    --dingletec--
    1. Re:Hmmm... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I never thought it was too bloated, but now that the installer is ~9MB (up from ~1.4MB), I might be inclined to agree with you.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by dingletec · · Score: 1

      I was also probably running it on a pentium 200MHz or at most a pentium II at the time, which was a long time ago... I've developed an appreciation for apps that are small and fast, yet do everything I need them to. Part of the reason I like Linux so much... I can slim it down as much as I want.

      --
      --dingletec--
  4. But it's not Open Source... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I really do love running Trillian on my windows platform, but I can't help but wonder if this story goes along with the rest of Slashdot type stuff. I mean, Trillian is:
    • Windows only
    • Not open source and probably never will be.
    • Its pro version isn't free.

    I was honestly surprised to see this on slashdot this morning. After all, there aren't many slashdot posts proclaiming excitement over new versions of SQL Server, right?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:But it's not Open Source... by swingkid · · Score: 1

      And yet, it's a great program. I've been using it for about 3 years and I love it. I don't mind paying for it, seeing as how I'm on IRC, AIM, yahoo and MSN all day long at work and home. There's stil l a number of things about it that bug me (no pun intended), but it's the best solution I've found so far. And no, I'm not a shill for trillian.

    2. Re:But it's not Open Source... by dingletec · · Score: 1

      It's still free to use, I think... It was great before I started using Linux and before I heard of GAIM. So while it's not OSS and is only for Windows, I for one still appreciate what it provided for me in the Windows Dark Ages.

      --
      --dingletec--
    3. Re:But it's not Open Source... by joebp · · Score: 0, Troll

      The free version is also adware. A fact they lie about on their website. For this reason I avoid trillian entirely.

    4. Re:But it's not Open Source... by rmarll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really do love running Trillian on my windows platform, but I can't help but wonder if this story goes along with the rest of Slashdot type stuff. I mean, Trillian is:

      * Windows only
      * Not open source and probably never will be.
      * Its pro version isn't free.

      I was honestly surprised to see this on slashdot this morning. After all, there aren't many slashdot posts proclaiming excitement over new versions of SQL Server, right?


      But it does have that "rebellious teen" flavor that slash geeks so enjoy. It's also saturday, and news is slow.
      On the other hand, in line with your SQL remark, the OSS community does have it's sometimes problematic but often workable variant in Jabber.

      Which brings us to my best guess why...
      A) The submitter suggested (and linked) that we pressure them toward a multiplatform product.
      B) Trillian does it's thing a fair bit better than anything the OSS community has been able to produce as of yet.

    5. Re:But it's not Open Source... by fermion · · Score: 0, Troll
      you forgot the redeeming aspekt. It skrews viable corporate entities by using thier networks without a compensating fee.

      In fact the product is windows only because it is

      • not open source
      • requires a fee to use full functionality
      • wants to make a profit by being a parasite on other efforts

      Which frankly is and has been the MS Windows philosophy.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The free version is now Trillian Basic 3.0. Trillian is still Windows only, and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know."

      Maybe its just an attempt to put pressure on them to port it/open source the program.

      *shrug*

    7. Re:But it's not Open Source... by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I also happen to hate the fact that it's a skinned app. I prefer apps with reasonably consistent interfaces, and skinning kinda throws that idea right out the window.

    8. Re:But it's not Open Source... by adeydas · · Score: 1

      exactly what i want to say, looks like /. is turning into a bulletien board...

    9. Re:But it's not Open Source... by zecg · · Score: 1

      B) Trillian does it's thing a fair bit better than anything the OSS community has been able to produce as of yet.

      Seriously, was that a troll? Haven't seen the last version, but the Trillian I knew from 2.x was a bloated piece of crap with confusing UI sacrificing usability for eye-candy. Miranda is infinitely superior as an IM client and can be extended just fine. It's also open source, not that I'm biased.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    10. Re:But it's not Open Source... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I was honestly surprised to see this on slashdot this morning.

      What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "News for OSS zealots?"

    11. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Cee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The free version is also adware. A fact they lie about on their website. For this reason I avoid trillian entirely.

      Well, from an outsider's point of view.. how do we know you're not just trolling? Some proof backing up what you're suggesting could be helpful.

    12. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Windows only"

      And how is that an indication on how good the program is?

      Seriously, what do you guys have against something that only works on Windows? Not every Windows developer is an MS clone.

      And do you want me to start listing the number of Linux only projects that keep being featured on Slashdot?

      "Not open source and probably never will be."

      There is nothing wrong with closed source.

      "Its pro version isn't free."

      Oh, my! Paying for a product?! How blasphemous!

      I love open source and free stuff. I use Linux both in the office and at home, and everything I run on it is free. But you'll never convince me that there is anything wrong with selling software for money, and keeping tight controls on the software (i.e. the license).

      Most of the open source stuff on Linux is a copy of closed source stuff. Usually all that happens is that the open source free version just adds a few extra features to make it better. There are only a few freeware products out there that actually took the initiative and were innovative enough to take the lead.

      --
      Beetle B.
    13. Re:But it's not Open Source... by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Never mind the system resources, disk space, download time, and memory requirements.

      Irrational sure, but every time an app crashes or does something bad I envision the meeting where they decided they had resources to devote to skinning their apps.

      Creative Labs is I think the ultimate example. The hardware and feature set are ok as bullets on the outside of the box. But the apps are coosed up like a welfare mom with too much makeup on, take forever to load and don't work as well as you would hope.

    14. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      As opposed to gAIM and Miranda, which surely send part of the money donated to them on to the various IM companies?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    15. Re:But it's not Open Source... by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Reguardless of the package it does integrate the messaging systems very well.

      I agree with your thoughts on their product, but they still do their primary function(s) better than anyone.

    16. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The "nerds" part

    17. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Funny
      What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "News for OSS zealots?"

      Report for Slashdot Groupthink retraining first thing Monday, creep.

      You should know that /. only covers OSS, and certainly never covers news about software by Microsoft, Apple, Sun, Google, Valve, Epic, Ubisoft, Sony, Take Two, Bungie, etc. After all, nobody who reads /. uses anything but Linux, you dolt.

      And don't you forget it!

    18. Re:But it's not Open Source... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      You might be confusing slashdot with this site:

      http://www.newsforge.com/

    19. Re:But it's not Open Source... by typobox43 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Adware? I think not. The only things that could be considered to be ads in Trillian Basic are the "Upgrade to Trillian Pro" menu item and the blurb about Pro in the Preferences screen. I don't think that's unreasonable that they want to sell the premiere version of their product, pushing it a little through the free one. There are no external ads whatsoever in the program.

    20. Re:But it's not Open Source... by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      Another Trillian = adware troll. Trillian isn't adware. Simple as that. I don't get why people feel the need to lie about a program simply because it isn't OSS.

    21. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Cee · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not adware.. it's nagware.

    22. Re:But it's not Open Source... by bonzoesc · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, Trillian Pro supports Jabber with a plugin.

      I'd say that Trillian is about on the level of (open-source) Adium on Mac.

    23. Re:But it's not Open Source... by cjb110 · · Score: 1

      any proof you'd like to link to??

      --
      ----- I refuse to have an argument with an unarmed person
    24. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you SEEN some of the crap posted these days? A story about Valve breaking Half-Life 2 on Cedega and ppl claim "Conspiracy!" How many times a day do we get "Kernel 2.6.X.X released!" And the other day we get "Anniversary of the 2.6 release!" Which day is it today? Do we love or hate IBM? Is BSD dead or alive? Reading /. any more is like dating a bi-polar person. One min they're laughing and ready fuck ur brains out, the next they want to throw shit at you and hate you for being a man. (true story)

    25. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Easy fix--find out what registry key it's touching to increment that hours counter, make a registry script to reset it, wrap trillian.exe in a batch file that includes that script--set and forget!

      ~~~

    26. Re:But it's not Open Source... by MXK · · Score: 1

      I haven't used the free version for over 2 years now, but your evidence of this is... what?

    27. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do you want me to start listing the number of Linux only projects that keep being featured on Slashdot?

      Sure, I doubt you'd find many. Most linux coders are competent enough that their code will run away from their pet platform.

    28. Re:But it's not Open Source... by eeg3 · · Score: 1

      What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "News for OSS zealots?"

      What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "Welcome to freshmeat.net?"

    29. Re:But it's not Open Source... by kjamez · · Score: 1

      it's not MircoSoft Trillian 3.0, just trillian ... add that MS, and shit hits the fan. i would be willing to bet the distributed nature of the im is what /. is excited about. (becuase damn everything /. looks at as a mass *NEEDS* distributed architecture in order to survive.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    30. Re:But it's not Open Source... by DeathBunnyRanger · · Score: 1

      Oh my god. Grow up.

    31. Re:But it's not Open Source... by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1
      What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "News for OSS zealots?"

      So, do you consider the release of a new version of an uninspiring IM client "News for Nerds" ? Personally I don't or at least I don't find it worthy of a front page release. If it is, I guess the new releases of other, more inspiring clients (gaim, aMsn, kopete, adium, miranda, etc...) will be shown in the main page too.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    32. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Aractor · · Score: 0

      I used 2.x for the longest time, and I don't know how anyone could find the UI confusing. Unless you have the same confusion when using all other standard Windows toolbars/UI's. The layout is clean, simple, and straight forward. If the default UI is honestly that much of a problem there are 1,000s of different skins you can get for it (For free) as well as a couple variations of the orignal skin already included (thin mode, tabbed mode, default mode).

      --
      That is aboslutely idiotic. You totally missed the point. Don't breed....please.
    33. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Aractor · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly sure no one is worried about screwing Micro$oft, AOHell, Yahoo, or ICQ out of a couple of bucks...lol. And yes, I tried to think of a negitive name change for Yahoo or ICQ but I just couldn't.

      --
      That is aboslutely idiotic. You totally missed the point. Don't breed....please.
    34. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like some freedom fries with your waaaaaaamburger?

    35. Re:But it's not Open Source... by dhoonlee · · Score: 1

      What makes the clients in your list, "inspired"?

    36. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you fools are bitching about. I found the free pro version floating around on Shareaza.

    37. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, nobody who reads /. uses anything but Linux Perhaps, but why, I'll never know. Buy a fscking Playstation and use your computer for computing.

    38. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A perfect sarcastic thread ruined by a person with steel pole up his or her ass.

    39. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Perhaps, but why, I'll never know. Buy a fscking Playstation and use your computer for computing.

      Report for Slashdot Groupthink retraining first thing Monday, creep.

      You'll be doing the lecturing, btw.

    40. Re:But it's not Open Source... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      I have used several skins, all of which have been highly usable.

    41. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and more than half slashdot user donate more money to Linux than to Microsoft. That's why we can say, it's not yet another Microsoft biased website.

    42. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to tell ONE Linux non-system program which is by-design made NOT to run for every user ?

      (and care to tell ONE Microsoft zealot which pay for its software, which the opposite would be so blasphemous ?)

    43. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what part of "portable", "runnable for everyone", "non-discriminatory" or "competition-friendly", translates into "zealot" ?

      I'm sick at the hypocrisis of MS's customers..

    44. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What part of "News for Nerds" translates into "News for OSS zealots?""

      It's bashwhore. It serves no other purpose than letting people post "omg m$ sux lol" over and over again. Think Counter-strike chat with anything even remotely intelligent cut out.

    45. Re:But it's not Open Source... by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

      Donations are donations, but they send 50% of everything they make on sales to the IM companies.

      --
      I am trolling
    46. Re:But it's not Open Source... by m50d · · Score: 1
      "Windows only"

      And how is that an indication on how good the program is?

      When code is not portable, it's often because it's been written badly. Not saying that's the case here, but in general it's true.

      And do you want me to start listing the number of Linux only projects that keep being featured on Slashdot?

      Slashdot is news for nerds, and these days most nerds are Linux users. Personally, I find it enormously refreshing to come here and find the assumption is that you are running Linux, the opposite of what you find on most "tech" sites.

      And you'll find most of those "linux-only" programs are portable to most POSIX systems

      There is nothing wrong with closed source

      Some of us disagree with that.

      --
      I am trolling
    47. Re:But it's not Open Source... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't undesrtand you people: why bother with some closed source IM client?
      Did you try Miranda?
      I can tell you that Miranda serves me 3 years already... No single glitch. Well.. not really ;) but the one scrolling bug I've got I just fixed myself... Opensource is still Opensource.
      Go Miranda.
      GAIM rules too :) But I still think its win32 version is immature.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    48. Re:But it's not Open Source... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Seriously, was that a troll? Haven't seen the last version, but the Trillian I knew from 2.x was a bloated piece of crap with confusing UI sacrificing usability for eye-candy.

      No, you're the troll. Trillian kicks ass. I've been using it for years, and aside from it's (former) lack of webcam support, it does everything that could be desired. If you don't like the UI, put a new skin on it. Anything in the Aikon line is superb.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    49. Re:But it's not Open Source... by n3tfury · · Score: 0

      They're not, he's just pulling your chain.

    50. Re:But it's not Open Source... by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1
      What makes the clients in your list, "inspired"?

      The fact that although they are all projects made by the community and for the community, they hold up pretty well against professional products and in some cases they even outperform them, whether it is in terms of functionality or in terms of technical achievement. That's what I consider inspiring and newsworthy.

      On the other hand, I don't find dissimulated commercials inspiring and in the end this is one.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    51. Re:But it's not Open Source... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I'm personally a fan of Trillian (Pro) over Gaim... I'm more of a graphically-inclined person, so I'm more inclined toward Trill's skinnability and generally more polished look, as opposed to Gaim's more beige-box-blah default-UI look.

      That said, I think they needed more standards for skin layout, especially back in 2.0. The 2.0 default skin (Cerulean, was it?) was quite confusing, I've got to say. Then, when I changed the skin, I ended up with a completely different layout... almost a completely different program. A lack of guidelines and complete customizability lead to my having to relearn the interface every time I changed skins.

      Granted, I eventually just picked up the excellent AikonLCD2 skin (which I hope will be coming out in the LCD form in a v3-compatible version soon!), and was happy from then on.

      I just recall a quite pooh-poohed article about how "skinning is bad" because it made a non-standard and noob-confusing interface between instance of the program. Although I don't agree with that position for most instances (after all, the person skinning it the one using it, and they want it that way, right?), Trillian was definitely an extreme example of that downside of skinning.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    52. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      "When code is not portable, it's often because it's been written badly. Not saying that's the case here, but in general it's true."

      Just because they teach that in basic CS design courses doesn't make it true. Good code is context dependent, and one has to look at what it will be used for.

      Software that's written without portability in mind, if written well, can often be far more efficient than portable code. In fact, it's quite common to find cross-platform software that's bloated - and the reason usually is that it's cross platform.

      (Of course, one can always write bloated code for single platforms...)

      If I write a small program intended only for my personal use, and can write it in 100 lines, whereas a portable version would take 125 lines, then I don't care what anyone says, my code is better.

      "Slashdot is news for nerds, and these days most nerds are Linux users. "

      Nonsense - unless you subscribe to the definition of a nerd being a Linux user. Forget online nerds and look at the ones around you. The majority prefer to use Windows. Some people would say that precludes them from being a nerd. I would say they don't know what a nerd means.

      " There is nothing wrong with closed source

      Some of us disagree with that."

      Linux would be in a poor state had it not been for closed source, as perhaps over 90% of apps on Linux are copies of closed source software. Face it, it's only recently that the open source community has shown any inclination to innovating on their own to set them apart from the closed source apps.

      Open source equivalents frequently are much better than their closed source forms, but I contend that most open source apps would not have come to be had the closed source versions not existed.

      --
      Beetle B.
    53. Re:But it's not Open Source... by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! In the Audigy 2 software I got, the functions are quite good, but the UI is quite odd. For instance the "system menu" button is now as wide as the title text in the title bar. On the topic of "not working as well as you'd like"... it has a nice THX speaker calibration which works quite well, but when you enter the "simple" speaker calibration it deletes the enter THX calibration without warning! Unfortunately, there are some settings that are only accessible through the simple calibration, like subwoofer settings. I only did the THX calibration twice before deciding that was not really a good use of my time.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    54. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was curious to think that the sky was the same for everybody, in Eurasia or Eastasia as well as here. And the people under the sky were also very much the same--everywhere, all over the world, hundreds or thousands of millions of people just like this, people ignorant of one another's existence, held apart by walls of hatred and lies, and yet almost exactly the same--people who had never learned to think but were storing up in their hearts and bellies and muscles the power that would one day overturn the world."

    55. Re:But it's not Open Source... by samael · · Score: 1

      these days most nerds are Linux users

      You're obviously hanging out with very different nerds to me. Are you mostly hanging out with the people from the local LUG?

    56. Re:But it's not Open Source... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Huh? Where did you get those figures from?

    57. Re:But it's not Open Source... by dingletec · · Score: 1

      Oops... You're right, it may not be adware. But these days it's almost safer to assume that if it is for Windows, and it's free, than it MUST contain adware. So there is no lying involved here, just perfectly reasonable assumptions. How would a user know, without doing careful research on the software before installing? How many users are going to do that? Is there any proof that it isn't adware? Is there someone maintaining a list of programs that are verified to be safe? The only way I can even feel remotely safe about the software is if it's source is available for peer review. After that is for a trusted group other than the company that developed it to publicly announce it to be free of adware/spyware. I have worked an ungodly amount of hours clearing off viruses, spyware/adware from systems on my network, so I have earned the right to be critical and make such assumptions. Even if I am occasionally wrong.

      --
      --dingletec--
  5. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by bhadreshl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apparently trillian is supposed to work with Wine and/or Crossover Office.

    I have gotten it to work with skins but it runs extremely slow on my Duron 700MHz.

    On windows, I have found that Trillian is the best Multi-IM client out there. I'm off to check out what new features they've added and if its worth upgrading.

  6. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by base3 · · Score: 1

    Gaim's a good concept, but I need interoperability with Trillian SecureIM. I know that the crypto-fanatics don't like it because the Diffie-Hellman key exchange is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. However, I still find it better than sending in the clear, and don't have to sell my contacts on gaim or teach them about key servers and all.

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  7. gaim by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    I tried an earlier version and wondered what the fuss was about... but it has gone so far in so little time and the rate of improvement is astonishing

    1. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine keeps complaining Gaim messes up his fonts, so I guess that's one reason.

    2. Re:Gaim by XMyth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it looks better (subjective, yes) and I (and most of the rest of the world) don't run linux.

    3. Re:Gaim by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      gaim has a windows port which is pretty stable, I can confirm that because I use it for my msn and aim accounts.

      Gaim has what I need. tabbed conversations to remove clustering, a file transfer that works, easy to configure and it looks simple & it blends in with the style of your theme.

    4. Re:Gaim by .+visplek+. · · Score: 1

      There is a Windows port of Gaim.

      --
      - Save a tree, eat more woodpeckers
    5. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can Gaim do MSN video chat?

    6. Re:Gaim by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why Use trillian?

      1. Its simple.
      2. It auto-updates now with 3.0
      3. Very customizeable
      4. Great plugin support
      5. Feature rich
      6. Fast/Efficient
      7. Well known

      I can go on and on. I use trillian for the above reasons and the superb support and almost up to the minute fixes for bugs/network changes and such.

      There is a reason you pay for software or use the free variants thereof. The service trillian offers ontop of a great IM client is worth the cause.

    7. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it will be introduced back into the main GAIM tree sometime before Linux is done.

      (It doesn't work now, and won't ever!)

    8. Re:Gaim by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 1

      I think that you basically just described gaim, other than possibly point 2.
      (Of course, point 2 is moot if your wonderful linux distribution does it for you...)

      Still not really seeing any benefit gained by paying for a different client, when all of your points are met by gaim.

    9. Re:GAIM by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      Less crash prone in my opinion. GAIM never quite works right, lacks a lot of features that make Trillian useful. I've been using 3.0 Pro since the 2nd or third alpha release and have been incredibly happy with it. If you want just simple messaging capabilities GAIM is great, but if you want video chats, audio chats, or anything advanced, GAIM bites the big one. Plus GTK on the windows platform really really sucks. Much better in unix land but it's not really worth installing on a windows machine if you ask me, my brother has tried using GAIM on XP and such, always updated, never worked right, he switched back to the official clients because they worked. Trillian may well do what he needs though and I haven't let him try it yet.

    10. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIM file transfers. It's been in Trillian for over two years now, and will probably never be in Gaim.

    11. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are MANY features that are curiously missing from gaim that make it completely useless. A big one is its inability to go into Invisible Mode for ICQ. How hard can it be to implement??

    12. Re:GAIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with GAIM for Windows users is that it is a Linux solution to a Windows problem. Why should install GTK+ so we can run some a port of an ugly Linux program under Windows? I love OSS as much as the next geek, but with this and Gimp and many others, the UI just looks like shit on Windows. Now if that was the only choice I had, that would be fine, but when there are other competing products which don't require me to install a slow UI Wrapper like GTK+ why would I choose that?

    13. Re:Gaim by antdude · · Score: 1

      Trillian has a better GUI IMO. I never liked Gaim's GUI.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    14. Re:Gaim by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I dont know what you call "stable"... Gaim eats a horrible death several times a day on windows for me. The linux version has been pretty stable thou.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    15. Re:GAIM by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Is there a point to free Trillian anymore? I'm not knocking it (much..), I did use it once upon a time and tbh it was very good, nice eye candy too, but since finding GAIM I haven't looked back.

      Well, I only use Windows on one machine, and I have Trillian installed. Why don't I use GAIM? Well, once upon a time, when I bought this laptop, I was looking for an IM client that supported the ICQ protocol (I use licq on my Linux boxen). I installed GAIM first, always going for the open source solution. It didn't work. Crashed. Nothing I could think of would make it load correctly.

      Now, before you go saying PEBKAC, I'm well experienced in these matters and believe me, while there may have been an issue with the configuration of *my* particular system, it's just a bit odd that 99% of all other software I've tried works just fine, but GAIM is in the 1% that did not.

      I installed Trillian after some hunting, and it worked great.

      This ends up being the #1 reason I make all my software choices and stick by them (until something changes that really annoys me)... It's the reason I chose KDE over GNOME (GNOME crashed the first time I tried it back in... 1997 or 1998. Installed KDE and it worked right the first time.)

      Until something happens with Trillian that makes me want to switch, or until GAIM has something that is so cool I can't stand to be without it, I'll stick with what's been working right. (And, while open source is plus, it is neither necessary nor sufficient for me to choose one product over another.)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    16. Re:Gaim by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Ohh, I know that. I've used it and like it...but I prefer trillian.

      When I do use an *n*x desktop (FreeBSD if I do) then I prefer Kopete over GAIM. GAIM doesn't feel integrated with anything (though the Windows port is getting better) unless you're using GNOME I guess.

    17. Re:Gaim by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Same reason people use Photoshop instead of GIMP and Opera instead of Mozilla/FF/TB: it's better! Somebody already listed the specific advanatges, so I'll skip that.

    18. Re:Gaim by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. AIM File transfers seem to work fine on Gaim for me. In fact, since I'm on a NAT'd connection and Gaim has an option IP and port, it works better than the official client for me (the official client may have this option now, I have not used it in a long time). If you are having trouble with file transfers on Gaim, direct connect, and then try again.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    19. Re:Gaim by Malc · · Score: 1

      I haven't checked out version 3, but previous versions were unusable without a mouse, and had major problems when using Tweakui's X-mouse (i.e. couldn't display menus).

    20. Re:GAIM by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but GAIM only supports one set of network connection preferences for all IM mediums. Trillian allows you to specify this information on a per-medium basis. Why does this matter, you ask? Well, I use SecWay's (free) Encryption plug-in for MSN which requires that you route your connection through a local proxy. This works great for MSN, but for my AIM contacts I need to connect directly through the AIM server, without using the local encryption proxy.

      I've tried GAIM, but it seemed like this wsa not configurable. With Trillian I can specify different network connection settings for MSN and AIM.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    21. Re:GAIM by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I use Miranda and it works great.
      Open Source.
      Windows native (no GTK)
      Does everything I need it to.
      Plenty of plugins.
      etc.

    22. Re:GAIM by neverbeeninariot · · Score: 1

      You're correct, although this is not so much a problem for me as 90% of my friends are on MSN, ho-hum... I use GAIM when I'm in Debian, and it blows Kopete away (I am a KDE'er btw although I'm on the Windows partion atm for some HL2 :)

      I used Trillian for a while up to ~0.74 but it felt, well, a bit clunky (as if GTK doesn't feel that way anyway on Win32, I know...) Anyhoo, for me, GAIM feels prettly light, small, fast enough. I guess also the fact that I can use the same interface on Win and Linux is a big deal for me, and that I don't have to resize my buddy icons to 7k is a boost for a lazy fecker like myself...

      Cool link btw, works here with Win GAIM, cheers.

      nbiar

    23. Re:Gaim by zullnero · · Score: 1

      You do realize, there's a free version of Trillian as well that does almost everything the Pro version does, right? The pro version adds video chat, Jabber, Rendezvous, and Novell Groupwise, and that's about it. I know I don't really have any use for those, (all my friends seem to have burned out on jabber), and most of us geeks would rather not use video chat. Especially after 10 hours of coding, 5 slices of cold pizza, and some mountain dew. I know I don't want my girlfriend seeing me like that. :(

    24. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but gaim for windows has had a feature that trillian lacks. the one that crashes the program once a day... it's one feature i'm happy to do without.

    25. Re:Gaim by novakreo · · Score: 1

      Because it looks better (subjective, yes) and I (and most of the rest of the world) don't run linux.

      One feature Gaim has which I haven't seen anywhere else yet (in a MSN client, at least) is the ability to show people's display pictures right in the contact list window. That in itself makes Gaim look much better to me.

      I've actually been looking for a MSN replacement for my housemate's computer (the official client requires IE to be installed, and it wastes limited screen space with ads), so I tried Trillian a few weeks ago.

      It looked simply awful. It had a horrible unintuitive skinned interface, in contrast to Gaim. Gaim might look just like any other bland Windows app, but its interface is simple, with clearly labelled buttons. Multi-platform support is a bonus, because I can run it here on Linux, and recommend it to people using Windows, knowing that it will work as it should.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    26. Re:Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's exactly that - a port. If I have a choice between comparable ported or cross-platform proggy and a native application, guess which one is an obvious choice ?

    27. Re:GAIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Correct me if I'm wrong

      Hit "Show more options" in the Modify Account dialog.

    28. Re:Gaim by longbot · · Score: 0

      Because GAIM has bugs out the ass and crashes all the time, and Trillian doesn't?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  8. GAIM by neverbeeninariot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is there a point to free Trillian anymore? I'm not knocking it (much..), I did use it once upon a time and tbh it was very good, nice eye candy too, but since finding GAIM I haven't looked back.

    nbiar

  9. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    Only thing I miss when using gaim is the video conferencing.

  10. Ill come back... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ill come back when they support HTML profiles/away messages, and fix file transfers.

    1. Re:Ill come back... by Tarcastil · · Score: 1

      Trillian Pro lets you view html profiles via a plugin.

    2. Re:Ill come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They do support HTML profiles/away messages with their MiniBrowser plugin.

    3. Re:Ill come back... by daeg · · Score: 1

      Pro version can use a plugin for the HTML profiles, and file transfers work about as reliably as the true clients do. T3 supports connecting through servers now, so even if your firewalls don't work, T3 can send files between AIM, for instance, by using the AOL servers. The same goes for MSN, and I believe Yahoo. Otherwise, simply configuring port forwarding on your firewall will solve the problems. They intend for version 3.1 to include UPNP support.

    4. Re:Ill come back... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      I have used Minibrowser, but it doesn't allow creation of HTML profiles/away messages, and I couldn't stand the fact that file transfers wouldn't work if the person wasn't also using Trillian.

    5. Re:Ill come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already did that...maybe you should do a little research before you post

    6. Re:Ill come back... by MoggyMania · · Score: 1

      It's entirely possible to create HTML profiles in Trillian... It doesn't have widgets to do all the work for you, but if you code it that way, it will show up properly on the other end. (I just discovered this recently myself.)

      File transfers with people using other IM programs also work in Trill 2.x at least for AIM. I send/receive files fairly often with non-Trillian users. That only started working within the past year, though.

    7. Re:Ill come back... by RonnyJ · · Score: 1
      Ill come back when they support HTML profiles/away messages, and fix file transfers.

      It appears that HTML profiles are planned for the next version (3.1), as well as possibly UPnP support (which should help with file transfers).

    8. Re:Ill come back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you should have before posting essentially the same comment that others already have.

  11. Missing from the FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Is there Mac or Linux support?"
    "No."

    Missing text is:

    "Is there a better option than Trillian for this support?"
    "Yes, it's called GAIM -- http://gaim.sourceforge.net"

    1. Re:Missing from the FAQ by leonscape · · Score: 1

      and for KDE users theirs Kopete. Both GAIM and Kopete also support more protocols, and are $25 cheaper.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    2. Re:Missing from the FAQ by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      Gaim doesn't handle voice/video chat... yet. So, it doesn't quite replace an IM client like Trillian.

      But don't get me wrong. Gaim, as a basic IM client, is pretty handy and is improving rapidly. It is my main IM client under windows and linux.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    3. Re:Missing from the FAQ by madssj · · Score: 1

      Well, on os x i use http://www.adiumx.com/ (gaim in a cocoa interface) and on Windows i still to this day use http://www.miranda-im.org/, and did do so ever since ICQ clocked the official client with ad's.

      The main issue i have with trillian is that is uses so many resources on doing a thing that souldent use any resources, plus the app is just ... well, slow.

      But it is really cool that they have gotten the video conference support, i really hope to see a OSS app that can do that. (yes i know of http://gaim-vv.sf.net/ - but it just doesnt work all that well)

    4. Re:Missing from the FAQ by dhoonlee · · Score: 1

      GAIM, because it uses GTK, has some funky windows behavior that I don't like.

  12. In China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China, Trillian is always positive!

    1. Re:In China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Soviet Russia, multi-IM client use you.

      In Korea, only old people use IM clients.

      ~~~

  13. And this is worthy of a /. story why? by Sanity · · Score: 1, Redundant
    So a company releases a new Windows-only non-free piece of software that isn't exactly groundbreaking (yet another IM client - BFD!) and it deserves a slashdot story now?

    Wow, the stories they don't post must be really boring if this is what does get posted.

  14. No MAC support!!?? by trance29 · · Score: 1

    Please dont complain there are options for mac users... I personally use Proteus and it works extremely well.

    1. Re:No MAC support!!?? by base3 · · Score: 1

      Does it interoperate with Trillian SecureIM?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:No MAC support!!?? by ShallowThroat · · Score: 1

      Thats nice, but you should really give Adium a try. Not only is it completely free, it uses LibGaim as it's backend and has a more beautiful and customizable front end then Proteus ever will.

      --
      The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
    3. Re:No MAC support!!?? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Trillian SecureIM is a vulnerable encryption protocol, and hence worse than useless.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:No MAC support!!?? by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      Yes, it's vulnerable--to someone who knows enough math and is sufficiently adept at crypto and TCP/IP programming to take over the connection at both ends, intercept and fake both public values, and sniff all the subsequent traffic based on the bogus combined key.

      I submit that perhaps someone worried about the biological weapons secrets he's talking about with Libyan agents on AIM needs to worry about this, but that the people trying to keep relatively unskilled network Nazis out of their personal chit-chat don't.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    5. Re:No MAC support!!?? by DonGar · · Score: 1

      I'm really fond of Fire. It actually uses Gaim (and other existing libraries), but gives a very Mac native look and feel.

      When I switched from windows, it was the best replacement I could find for Trillian Pro. A multi-protocol client was a hard requirement for me, which knocked out iChat and most of the others I looked at.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    6. Re:No MAC support!!?? by m50d · · Score: 1

      I submit that someone who doesn't need to worry about this doesn't need to be encrypting their chats at all.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:No MAC support!!?? by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      You honestly don't believe there's a difference in degree between the "LAN guy" on an unswitched network and a spy agency with the resources of a government? Do you come home through a network of concrete and steel barriers, navigate a barbed wire boundary, and low crawl under tracer rounds to get to the retinal scanner which will allow you into the man trap that leads to the blast-hardened elevator to your bunker below?

      I agree with you that it would be great for everyone who uses crypto to use the best available, but sometimes other considerations (in this case compatibility with something with a much larger installed base). Perhaps if gaim supported the SecureIM protocol and supplanted some Trillian installs, those using it would eventually switch to using verifiable keys once each discovered someone other than him or herself is using a capable client.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  15. No need for Trillian on Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Adium doesn't have all the features of Trillian yet, but it's getting nicer each release. Plus it supports more IM protocols (it's based on libgaim).

    1. Re:No need for Trillian on Mac OS X by Chiisu · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Adium. My brother showed it to me months ago, by far my favorite IM program now.

  16. Concise, clear, elegant... by Omicron32 · · Score: 1

    Is there Mac or Linux support?
    No.


    Fair enough.

  17. Trillian is blah by GlassUser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not open source, costs too much, tons of bloat, and still not finished (eg the UI still requires a cheap hack of a skin, and most dialogs don't respond to keyboard input).

    I'm far more impressed with miranda.

    1. Re:Trillian is blah by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      Same thing for me. At my University they installed Trillian Free everywhere, but I prefer carrying Miranda IM on my USB key. I really don't like Trillian, but I feel more "at home" with Miranda.

  18. Trillian user for life by lightdarkness · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to use gaim for the longest time, but often times found it frusterating. When I first got it, I tried for about 2 hours, with no evial, to change how the text appeard on my end. Not to mention that it is hard to find everything, and I think the connection manager is lacking several important featres.

    I've been using Trillian Pro for a few months, and Pro 3 since the alpha version was released, and I absolutly love it. The tabs are much better than GAIM's, and I can have multipul tabs, for my friends, family, IRC, or just one huge one if thats what I want.

    The one thing that trillian totaly owns gaim in, is it's plugins. They are so awesome, and offered free by Trillian. The spellchecker is something i've needed for so long (as i'm sure you can tell).:-P

    Anyways, before you go and bash Trillian because it costs money, look at all the features you are getting.

    1. Re:Trillian user for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use gaim for linux. apparently there is supposed to be a spell checker enabled with gtkspell. i cannot, however, for the life of me, get the spell checker working. :(

    2. Re:Trillian user for life by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent on this one... and why on earth would a anyone mod that a troll?! I use the weather plugin for Trillian, and the RSS newsreader plugin... I only use GAIM on my linux box, although I am going to see how much wine cripples Trillian, and possibly switch.

  19. Serverless Messaging: Useful in Tibet & West C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The serverless messaging feature should prove useful in Tibet and Western China (where the Uighurs are being butchered). The Tibetans can use Trillian to send messages directly to Western reporters who can frequently switch their IP addresses in order to avoid being blocked by Beijing. Does GAIM have the same serverless messaging feature?

  20. Gaim by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Does the same thing and works on Windows and Linux.


    So why use Trillian?

    --
    The cake is a pie
  21. CRASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly enough I was about to pay for trillian, but when I installed the preview version over a a-hem, cracked 2.x version, it imediately CRASHED, removed folder, reinstalled 3, crash. remove folder go through registry, reinstall 3, crash. Looks like trill doesn't get my money.

    1. Re:CRASH by Todrael · · Score: 1

      I had a legal copy of Trillian installed, and it crashes every time I try to load the new v3.0 :( Very unhappy, especially considered I paid for the damn thing when there are plenty of free clients around.

    2. Re:CRASH by puck71 · · Score: 1

      They just released a new build of 3.0 that should fix the crashing problems.

  22. GPL alternatives: Adium and Gaim by papasui · · Score: 1

    On windows I use Gaim and on OS X I use Adium. I like Gaim, but I think Adium is a much better program to compare against Trillium. The thing about Gaim (and a lot of cross platform programs, open source or otherwise) is that they just don't feel like a quality program despite working fine. Boils down to the user interface I guess and maybe I've only noticed since recently converting to OS X but everything doesn't need to be ugly. It can be pretty while still getting the job done.

    1. Re:GPL alternatives: Adium and Gaim by bennyp · · Score: 1

      There is an Aqua theme for GTK; Just look at Gimp.app. Free software is as pretty or ugly as you decide to make it.

      --
      could it be?
  23. adium trillian by Derek+Arnold · · Score: 1

    just use adium if you're in os x. trillian is obsolete.

  24. Should I... by kryogen1x · · Score: 1

    I'm using gAIM and mIRC, should I use the IRC feature of gAIM, rather than running two applications? The only thing that's keeping me from leaving mIRC is the fact that mIRC is so expandable with scripts and everything. Does IRC on gAIM support scripts and addons? Or should I stick with mIRC?

    1. Re:Should I... by Derek+Arnold · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer to use irssi through a shell, but I'd stick with mIRC. Last I checked the IRC support was kind of goofy.

    2. Re:Should I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol lysol did wtc

    3. Re:Should I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should install activeperl, and use xchat.

      script support, and all that. no mirc underpinnings. of course, your question completely dogdged what you *really* wanted.

      xchat supports scripting, mirc supports scripting. you said you wanted scripting supports (hint: mirc scripts SUCK). you didn't say you wanted mirc compatible scripts.

      </pedantic>

    4. Re:Should I... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      I'm using gAIM and mIRC, should I use the IRC feature of gAIM, rather than running two applications? The only thing that's keeping me from leaving mIRC is the fact that mIRC is so expandable with scripts and everything. Does IRC on gAIM support scripts and addons? Or should I stick with mIRC?

      How about a third option? (This is a shameless plug, I've contributed code to the project I'm about to recommend.)

      Try X-Chat for all your multi-platform IRC needs. It is highly expandable with plugins and scripts that can be written in python or perl.

      The official Windows build is shareware (a decision I disagree with, but it's not my project), however, the source is GPLed and there are third-party Windows builds that are free.

      The advantages of X-Chat?
      * Open Source
      * Not subject to mIRC vulnerabilities
      * Not subject to mIRC script viruses
      * Plugin interface
      * Perl and Python scripting.
      * No built-in trout-slap popup.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    5. Re:Should I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Gaim. Not gAIM. Not GAIM.

      Gaim. :)

  25. I tried to get my friend into Trillian by Jarwulf · · Score: 0, Troll

    But the darn thing was so unreliable when she tried it that a third of the time it would log on to AIM. That and the fact that she couldn't get all the smilies to work or the windows to popup drove her away completely. She wouldn't even listen once I brought GAIM around...

  26. Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by TheMadRedHatter · · Score: 1

    Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. Trillian isn't great. I've used it several times and keep going back to Gaim. Gaim has a far better interface. It FEELS like it belongs running in the OS, Trillian (and other skinnable apps) don't.

    -- SirG3

    --

    while(1)
    {

    }

    Ah, the story of life.
    1. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that there are far too many skin-able applications out there... you have to remember who many of them are designed for... those who like their PC to look cute and pretty... rather than be lean, mean and as fast as possible without wasting time on cute things here and there.

      Hell, it's this attempt at cuteness that has kept me from upgrading to Windows XP, even in the non Fisher Price mode it's still to pastel for me.

    2. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by neverutterwhen · · Score: 1

      I have trillian and GAIM and the only reason I still use trillian is because I can't work out how to have a three(or more) way conversation in GAIM. Am I missing something or does GAIM not support that?

      --
      My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
    3. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      On my copy of GAIM, there are four buttons: "IM", "Get Info", "Chat", and "Away". I think "Chat" does what you want.

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    4. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by neverutterwhen · · Score: 1

      You're like some kind of insane genius. thanks

      --
      My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
    5. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but trillian blends in perfectly with my "whistler" desktop theme in xp.

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
    6. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expiring soon... The copyright on Linux! [blogspot.com]

      Who the fuck is Linus Travolis? Did he play in Pulp Fiction 2: Good Grief Charlie Brown?

    7. Re:Tell them we don't need a Mac / Linux port. by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out that typo, it's fixed now. But from the looks of it I got it right once and wrong another time within the same post, oops.

  27. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by kbahey · · Score: 1

    This may change soon.

    There is a GAIM Voice and Video project, that is a friendly fork off the main GAIM project.

    Hope something good comes out of this, since I too use Yahoo on Windows because of voice.

  28. Re: Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform by MC+Negro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I switched to Win32 gAIM simply because I found everything about Trillian annoying as Hell. The interface felt too clunky and bloated with visuals (this was really a problem with multiple protocols). My situation is such that the network admin on campus has denied access to AIM and has provided no alternative. Initially, I would just install Trillian/Miranda/gAIM each time I logged in, but I found the installation process for each a bit tedious after logging in 2-3 times a day at different workstations.

    When I bough a USB thumbdrive, I started putting all my essential apps such as FireFox on it so I could avoid reinstallation with each login. Trillian gave me some trouble with installation on a USB key (it wouldn't keep my profile data on the USB key nor would it make it apart of my Windows roaming profile), so I just finally completely migrated over to gAIM. It installed on my USB key without a hitch, has a cleaner interface, keeps logs of everything in my roaming profile and is easy to update. Even file transfer works for me now.

    --
    "You and your third dimension."
  29. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by trompete · · Score: 1

    Try the gaim encryption plugin. It sounds like you had the same problem I did.

    Get it from here

    I've been using these two for 1.5 years, after switching from trillian (2 years)

  30. Trillian's forum... by EntrancedX · · Score: 0

    I just browsed through trillian's forum and noticed that there has been quite a bit of posts requesting port to LINUX and other OSes. This has been going on for about 5 years now. I'm not sure that the developers are really concerned with this issue and probably will never port trillian to non-windows OS. I guess people can keep on posting and maybe their persistance will pay off in the end. * I'm quite happy with Gaim *

  31. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by flithm · · Score: 1

    Gaim has encryption support which is far superior to trillians. Of course it does standard RSA (512-4096 bit) encryption, and in addition there's a new Off the Record plugin which allows for plausible deniability as well.

    If you want security, gaim is definitely the way to go.

  32. Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was looking at their website. Very difficult to navigate compared to the old style. Don't bother trying now, the site's been slashdotted, meaning no one can access it anyways. At least it survived a few minutes.

  33. Nice but crashy by .+visplek+. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Trillian 3 is a very nice app indeed. The speed of file transfers has been increased and the Rendez Vous (LAN messenger) is a nice addition too. Too bad file tranfers (via MSN and Rendez Vous) seem to crash the app randomly.

    --
    - Save a tree, eat more woodpeckers
  34. AltMe by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't use any of these messaging sytems.
    I use this one: http://www.altme.com/
    You set up your own server, decide who can use the system and who not, ...

    And it runs on Windows and Linux.

    --
    My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
    1. Re:AltMe by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Why not just use standard IM (RFCs 3920-3923)?

      --
      Luke-Jr
    2. Re:AltMe by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

      I will probably in the future migrate to a Jabber server.
      However, in the past I tried with JabberD2 http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/2/ and it was not easy to get it running.
      I have not tried any of the commercial Jabber servers yet.
      The nice thing about AltMe is that it s so easy to set up. No install required. Just double click and go...

      --
      My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
    3. Re:AltMe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess there are many lonely nights for ya...

      Trillian is a great application and for the cheap bastards who won't pay a penny and support quality are missing out.

    4. Re:AltMe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the benefit AltMe provides over Jabber is...

    5. Re:AltMe by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, the idea is to talk to -other- people out there. I mean, if you really want to be king of your own chat system, great, but most of my friends would probably prefer that I use the servers they're already on...

    6. Re:AltMe by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

      I use this in a corporate environment. I go out with friends and have a drink in the evening. Not talk to them by computer. All my long distance contacts are by email or, indeed, AltMe.

      --
      My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
    7. Re:AltMe by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

      Ease of use and installation. But indeed, in the future I will probably switch to Jabber.

      --
      My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
    8. Re:AltMe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try ejabberd. As easy to install as 'apt-get install ejabberd' on Debian sid.

      It includes Jabber server with database store configured, multiconference service, JUD, IRC-t and web administration.

    9. Re:AltMe by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Ah, OK. Yeah, in a corp environment I'd go with something like AltMe (we used icb at Red Hat/Cygnus). Too many security issues with standard IM software, IMO.

    10. Re:AltMe by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I will try it out as soon as I have time.

      --
      My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
  35. Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too am suprised that Trillian was posted on Slashdot this morning. Most software applications announced here are piece-of-shit buggy "open source" applications developed by stupid teenagers with too much time on their hands.

  36. Ever try typing Japanese? by CoolMoDee · · Score: 2, Informative

    The thing that urked me about Trillian, and it still may be true today, is that it mangles UTF-8 text. Sending Japanese back and forth between trillian to trillian works fine, but trillian to aim/iChat/gaim and it gets mangled. Another thing that urks me, is that their audio/video chat don't "Just work" like it does with iChat (though it is compatible).
    [end rant]

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    1. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried it personally, but there have been many UTF-8 bugfixes in 3.0. You might want to give it a try.

    2. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by ChickenBlood · · Score: 1

      One of the first things I did was give it a try. Doesn't work still. Trillian to Trillian is fine. Trillian (basic... so maybe pro fixes this) to AIM is another story. AIM just isn't unicode freindly I fear. The only time that I have seen Japanese displayed correctly by AIM was when it was sent to me by someone using Adium X.

      If anybody knows how to get Japanese to work correclty on AIM plz say something.

    3. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it's interest for you, but yesterday i setup a jabber server (OpenSource IM protocol, including servers and security), and sending multilingual text from Gaim to Kopete worked flawlessly

    4. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irk. Not "urk".

    5. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      I don't speak any language outside of English, so I can't confirm this first-hand, but from the latest Trillian blog entry: "We've added Unicode support [to 3.0] to allow international text, and pulled that through the system."

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    6. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by mbaciarello · · Score: 1

      In case you'd like to speak in Japanese (UTF-8) over MSN, Adium for OS X reads fine on MSN Messenger clients, and viceversa.

    7. Re:Ever try typing Japanese? by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      I've had unicode working fine from every aim client to every aim client..minus trillian. e.g. it works fine from iChat (my client of choice) to aim/gaim (linux and windows)/ichat.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  37. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Tarcastil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's good to emphasize that, although Trillian and GAIM are competitors, they share information with each other when things go awry. Whenever Yahoo! makes a change that screws up GAIM and Trillian, you can bet the devs on both sides will be helping each other out. Now that's a good proprietary/open source relationship.

  38. gaim beats trillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaim has a number of more advanced features in comparison to Trillian. More importantly: if the Trillian developers want their software to be around for a while they better have a Linux version out very soon.

  39. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by chill · · Score: 1

    While I'm unsure about video, Linspire has Phone Gaim that integrates SIP calling.

    It even has an option ($) for chatting from Gaim to regular telephones.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  40. Let's see ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    He said ... works on Windows and Linux.

    You said ... I (and most of the rest of the world) don't run linux.

    Way to go! The Shrub administration has a job for you.

    1. Re:Let's see ... by XMyth · · Score: 1

      My point was, if most of the world doesn't use Linux then the fact that GAIM works on both doesn't buy it anything.

  41. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Clete2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yep and we have proof of this. On several occasions, their websites have reported that one helped out the other or vice versa assisting with code to get it working again.

  42. miranda! by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Informative

    and in addition there is miranda (mirando-im.org). It is:
    - Windows/wine only
    but it is:
    - GPLed software
    - its also free as infree beer
    and it is even more powerful than trillian ...

    1. Re:miranda! by Orlando · · Score: 1

      Mod this up!

      I've been using Miranda for 6 months now on my work machine, and I've been very pleased with it. It just works, simple, un-bloated, and the UI doesn't look like the circus just rolled into town.

      --
      -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  43. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

    That and the fact that gaim is free. Trillian's free version hasn't been updated since when?

  44. Adium Rocks my Socks Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't think it would be worth releasing Trillian for the Mac. Adium X does everything I've ever seen a Trillian user do and it doesn't have all the craptastic bugs. Also, its baised off of gaimlib and free, yep FREE.
    So, why would they want to release on Mac, they'd have to compete with a free, good client.

  45. Wikipedia by BReflection · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Wikipedia by ksiddique · · Score: 1

      It's too bad they didn't include Webmessenger. I use it at work and on my BlackBerry. Works like a charm.

  46. Video feeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it do video chats like MSN Messenger can?

  47. IM Chat Is Unsafe and Easily Read By ISP adms and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IM Chat Programs do not have encryption. The chats can be easily read by ISP adms and hackers. It's amazing what people will say on IM that are unsecured...

  48. Re: Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the first Q&A in their FAQ: Q. What does "Gaim" stand for? A. For freedom! No, seriously, it doesn't stand for anything. It's our name and we're sticking to it. The two acceptable forms of capitalization are "Gaim" and "gaim" (and not "GAIM").

  49. RE: regarding Linux and Mac support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't know about Mac but Gaim fill that niche in Linux nicely :^)

  50. It's a major issue. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Almost all of the IM services support voice and video but, none of the open source ones seem to. I would have expected Jabber to be leading the way in this area but, Jabber's development seems to have stagnated. I'm really surprised that the open source clients haven't got the features that the closed source ones do.

    1. Re:It's a major issue. by Satcho · · Score: 0

      Easier said than done, my friend.

    2. Re:It's a major issue. by slimyrubber · · Score: 1
      Almost all of the IM services support voice and video but, none of the open source ones seem to.
      Gaim-VV seemed to work fine, last I checked. Also Gyach Enhanced works great, but its yahoo specific.

      --
      [ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
    3. Re:It's a major issue. by FxChiP · · Score: 1

      No flaming me for this, but exactly how many non-obscure webcams work on Linux? Just for kicks, include cameras that use chipsets/whatever from other cameras.

      I don't really know of any, so this is out of curiosity, too. But besides the finding of a webcam, is there a standard interface to get images/video from it, too?

      Disclaimer: I am an avid Linux user who doesn't own a webcam.

    4. Re:It's a major issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still it's a valid point.

    5. Re:It's a major issue. by runderwo · · Score: 1
      I don't really know of any, so this is out of curiosity, too. But besides the finding of a webcam, is there a standard interface to get images/video from it, too?
      V4L (Video4Linux)
  51. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
    Apparently trillian is supposed to work with Wine and/or Crossover Office.

    I'd like to meet someone who got it to work. The last time I tried this, running Trillian in Wine brought down the whole computer. I've been very leery of Trillian, and repeating the experiment, ever since.

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  52. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since this morning.

    Trillian 3.0 includes a Basic (free) and Pro (not free) version. The basic version feels very much like 1.0 Pro, with the odd feature from 2.0 Pro. They're done a fair amount of updating with useful little features, and they run from the same codebase now.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  53. "serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iChat? by leviathan · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know if Trillian's "serverless messaging mode using Rendezvous" is compatible with Apple iChat?

    "Serverless messaging" is something very neat to have. If someone points me to documentation about the protocol the Trillian messenger uses, I'll make a plugin for gaim. I don't need any documentation about mDNS/DNS-SD, that is something which is available plentyful. What I am looking for is documentation about the exchanged messages.

  54. Cheap hack of a skin. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Is it as bad as XMMS?

  55. No Mac/Linux Support by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know.

    Sigh. Look, take a hint boys and girls. The FAQ entry for Mac and Linux support makes it abundantly clear that Trillian developers have NO interest in supporting anything but Windows, and by badgering them, you'll just make it even less likely.

    I don't understand why it's so difficult for the OSS community to just get the point -- some people don't want to play in your sandbox. Yet, invariably, I see the constant calls to hassle developers because of the choice they've made. Sure, some of them may not be aware that non-Windows users have an interest in their product, but I will bet dollars to doughnuts that the vast majority just choose not to. Is it so hard to accept that not everyone wishes to adopt or assist in your cause?

    If I were a Trillian developer, and my inbox was suddenly filled with the typical bizarre sense of entitlement found here at Slashdot, even after I had posted an absolutely clear disinterest in supporting Mac or Linux in my FAQ, I guarantee that your grandchildren would be in their cold graves before I'd ever produce a non-Windows version.

    This Just In -- you can't make people comply by pissing them off.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    1. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a F*&#ING liberal hippie. Look at Bush and Iraq. If he can do it, we can!

    2. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Bob+Wehadababyitsabo · · Score: 1

      We don't need trillian for Mac. Adium (site seems to be down ATM) is the best IM client out there on any platform IMO.

      --
      fsck -u
    3. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by dingletec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since they are trying to live off selling their product, they would be interested in finding more customers. Here's a newsflash for you, buddy... Most Linux users are not interested in Trillian! There are a half dozen or more similar programs for Linux already. Who cares about one more? There is more software available for Linux than I will ever use, and that is growing rapidly. It's their loss if they don't support Linux, not mine. They would certainly have to offer something incredible for me to pay money for it regardless of the OS I use.

      --
      --dingletec--
    4. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      Except that file transfers SIMPLY DONT WORK :)

      Not that I'm really complaining. I'm getting my money's worth, plus some.

    5. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      If they're not going to write portable code either way, there's no harm in pissing them off. Plus, there's the added bonus of they'll be pissed off.

    6. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why it's so difficult for the OSS community to just get the point -- some people don't want to play in your sandbox.

      You think that's bad? Try writing a linux/mac program and refusing to let it run on windows.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    7. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful, yeah right. You want Cerulean Studios to spend quite a lot of money (which is a lot to them because they aren't diverse in other products) on supporting other platforms that have a much smaller market share? What if you created a product with much effort to cater to 90% of an audience and you had little trolls in your ear that said "cater to us 10%" in a little yelping voice. Would you fix bugs that come up in your new major release of your product so that faults that arise don't damage your reputation too much or do you move most of your programmers over to begin porting your product to an entirely different platform? Try and not be susceptible to knee-jerk reactions in the future, thanks.

    8. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So...how about OSS efforts to develop Trillian clones?

      I've already got the names picked out:
      Zaphod: OSX ('cause it's the hippest OS)
      Arthur: Zaurus (small brain, but still very valuable)
      Slartibartfast: Solaris (older than the rest)
      Marvin: EarthSim (here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they make me run an IM client. I'm not getting you down, am I? Because I wouldn't want to get you down. Life! Don't talk to me about life).
      Last two I can't think of any really good reason for the names, though:
      Eddie: BSD
      Ford: Linux

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    9. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear. I hope that some of the open source IM packages out there will look at Trillian for some feature inspiration instead of just badgering Cerulean to get it on Linux. Trillian has some great features, and short of Cerluean patenting these features somehow, I would consider just the idea of these features a small gift to the OSS community.

    10. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Sparks23 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not even so much that we're uninterested, it's that we know Trillian isn't really as well-suited to the model of MacOS X or Linux applications. (FWIW, at least two Trillian developers -- including me -- have Macs as well as windows boxes. I'm posting this from Safari, in fact.)

      I develop Mac OS X software in my spare time, and I can tell you flat out that Trillian would violate the Aqua Design Guidelines six ways from Sunday unless completely reworked, just for starters. (Of course, a depressing number of Macintosh applications also do, but still.) And for a small development team, trying to keep a single code tree in sync across multiple platforms without making it suffer overall, would be hard; that's something far easier for an OSS project. We /do/ periodically re-examine the possibility, but...

      Honestly, Trillian's designed not for the power-users who want to get down and dirty with every little aspect of an IM protocol, or for OSS activists. It's designed, as has been noted, more for Joe Average; this is why Trillian 3.0 is made to look and feel more like a Windows XP application in the preferences system and whatnot. And to some extent, that userbase tends to be more prominent on Windows.

      For those who are really into OSS or are on Linux, Sean and the others who work on it have made a great app in Gaim. And for those who are on Mac OS X, Adium X is pretty kickass. Heck, even the new iChat in Tiger is pretty straightforward for Joe Average Mac User.

      It's not like there's some Highlander-esque 'there can be only one!' situation with instant messaging clients. You'll even notice we at Cerulean are on good terms with the Gaim team; when Yahoo locked everyone out last time, we deciphered the new login protocol and donated it to Gaim (and to Adium as a result). You can find other instances in the Gaim changelog of code donated from Trillian; it's certainly not like we're out to kill open source and crush all opposition or something. ("I am Trillian MacLeod of the clan MacLeod, and I've come to take your head developer!")

      Gaim and Trillian are made to fill a different niches. If one's right for you, great! Doesn't mean the other one isn't right for other people. :)

      --
      --Rachel
    11. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Unxmaal · · Score: 1
      Zaphod: OSX ('cause it's the hippest OS)

      Why bother?

      Adium stomps the snot out of all other messenger clients, and it's OSX-only.

      --
      http://unxmaal.com
    12. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's usually because the developers are not skilled enough to handle cross platform programming.

      if they say no to linux and Mac it's because they are only capable of programming in dev studio, and only capable of modular programming.

      really sad in a way, but typical of CS students fromthe past 5 years.

    13. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This Just In -- you can't make people comply by pissing them off."

      If that is true then what is the point of crashbore? People _should_ think annoying 14-year-old retard when you say that you use *nix.

    14. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by ChickenBlood · · Score: 1

      ...and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know.

      funny... because if I remember straight, a few days ago much of /. was clamoring that OSS shouldn't be ported to windows because it hurt OSS. But now we should be porting windows apps to linux?

      "Free Software desktop applications on Windows represent a no-win situation for Open Source[...]"
      -Open Source on Windows - Boon or Bane for Linux?

      Am I the only one who sees this as a little hypocritical?

    15. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I can tell you flat out that Trillian would violate the Aqua Design Guidelines six ways from Sunday unless completely reworked

      You completely failed to implement windows guidelines properly already... So why not Mac?

    16. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by trudyscousin · · Score: 1

      Even though you guys have decided not to provide a Mac or OSS client, your thoughtful reply is a nice consolation prize.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    17. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep up the good work.

    18. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by jsight · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Slashdot mention above meant what you thing it means. Maybe they are not interested in a Linux port, but perhaps they reevaluate the option of providing Linux and MacOS support from time to time (they've obviously helped the GAIM folks quite a bit).

      Perhaps it would still be useful to mention your desire to purchase a Linux copy, anyway? If they ever did decide to, it would at least help to estimate sales.

      Of course (as always) be polite when doing so. Believe it or not, most users know this.

    19. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      I think we have different ideas about what "stomps the snot" means. Adium would stomp the snot out of all other messenger clients, except that it's OSX-only.

      Same could be said of Trillian, actually.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    20. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FAQ entry for Mac and Linux support makes it abundantly clear that Trillian developers have NO interest in supporting anything but Windows

      No, it merely states that it isn't available for Linux or Mac. It makes no mention of future plans.

      Yet, invariably, I see the constant calls to hassle developers because of the choice they've made.

      Since when does "if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know" qualify as some kind of attack?

      Is it so hard to accept that not everyone wishes to adopt or assist in your cause?

      Is it so hard to understand the concept of "they won't port unless they know there's a market for it?"

    21. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who sees this as a little hypocritical?

      Yes, because Slashdot is a bunch of people who don't always agree with one another. To say "Slashdot says this, and now it says that" is boneheaded, because they are different people saying those things.

    22. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by sahrss · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the mature reply, and thanks for the app I first got away from 3 IM clients with.

      I'm using GAIM now, and it's great to hear that Cerulean has made contributions to improve GAIM! Big points for that.

    23. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by rritterson · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have no way of contacting you directly, so my best bet is to post this here and hope you come back to read replies to your posts.

      While Trillian may not be designed for the power-user, I think you have create a product that does appeal to us. For starters, I can run Trillian and use much less RAM than I would running MSN, Yahoo, AIM, and ICQ simultaniously. Metacontacts are a divine gift to me when dealing with my 'i have 10 screen names so I'm better than you' friends.

      I also have a hard time believing that you are designing exclusively for the average user when you provide an expandable framework for designing plug-ins. Yes, you did redesign the interface. No, I don't like it. Yes, I see the point and help it might provide to a noob, but I still liked the old menu best.

      When you hear us clamoring for an OSX or Linux version it's not so much that we want Trillian on PowerPC. Rather, we believe that Cerulean could make the best all-in-one IM client for those platforms. Personally, while I admire Gaim's OSS development, I think its windows version sucks compared to Trillian. (I have no choice on my Linux machines).

      I agree, porting trillian to another platform would be difficult and not worth the effort. So start anew. Trillian 3.0 is out. Wind down developement and start something else.

      Until you do, I won't be talking to my MSN or Yahoo friends. Heck, I won't even have an AIM profile thanks to iChat.

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    24. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Seq · · Score: 1

      As a beta tester of trillian (before pro) from version 0.62 -> 0.72(ish), I ended up ditching it for Gaim (on both Linux, and occasionally in Windows). I was one of the people back in the day who ran Trillian in Wine. Think about it though, the two big linux "desktop environments" are really pushing for integration right now. The Gnome corner is trying to pull Evolution and Gaim's contact lists together, and keeping a unified look across all applications. KDE is pretty good at making the user feel like everything is tightly integrated already (I'm not a user, but it seems that way). Not to mention trillian wouldn't blend with the "look and feel" of either. They might get some users in the new-user-from-windows and it-skins-so-it-must-be-1337 catagories, though ;)

      --
      -- Seq
    25. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Sparks23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank you for the comment! And no, we're not designing exclusively for the average user -- as you note, the plugin architecture exists, and has been expanded on for this release -- but the average user is still a major consideration in everything. :)

      Like I said, periodically we re-examine the possibility of ports, but in all honesty, it's not that likely to happen. Even starting from scratch wouldn't help that much; it's still a small team, and maintaining a Mac OS X tree, a Linux tree and a Windows tree would be a huge headache.

      It's likely that one or all would suffer; you'll notice most cross-platform projects tend to aim for a common denominator. Take, for instance, Thunderbird; Thunderbird is a great app (and under Windows, my first choice in mail clients), but most Mac users I know don't use Thunderbird. Why? Because Thunderbird doesn't do things Mac-ishly. Thunderbird doesn't integrate with the system spellchecker framework. It doesn't integrate with the system Address Book framework.

      It's really hard to design a cross-platform product of any kind and have it actually feel /right/ for every platform it runs on. A lot of Linux apps ported to Mac OS X or Windows still feel like Linux apps, for instance. To do an IM client /right/ for OS X, we'd want to integrate into the Address Book, replace our notification system with Growl, support the system-wide spellchecker, and so on.

      Of course, there already /is/ an OS X application which integrates with the Address Book, uses Growl for notifications, and integrates with the system-wide spellchecker. It's called Adium X. ;)

      Seriously, if you're really stuck right now for a multi-network option under OS X, I strongly recommend checking out Adium; Adam Iser and his team have built a really good client that integrates well with OS X, and it's worth at least looking at.

      --
      --Rachel
    26. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Mitch+Cumstein · · Score: 1

      "this is why Trillian 3.0 is made to look and feel more like a Windows XP application in the preferences system and whatnot" Unfortunately, Trillian copied one of the worst aspects of the Windows XP user experience - the bloated control panel category view.

    27. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by jazman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trillian violates several Windows usability guidelines as well. I found it very odd at first. I'm sure you guys think it's perfectly logical, but it took me a while to get used to.

      However, it wasn't that, but Trillian's nag screen that made me decide to switch to Gaim. Make sure v3 has a "No thanks and you don't need to keep asking every fscking day" button and you'll avoid losing more people like me. I don't like naggy software and avoid/crack it wherever possible (although the only option with Trillian was to crack the Pro version). I usually prefer FOSS to running cracked versions, and Gaim is usable now, so I switched.

    28. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ford: Linux

      A cheapskate..

    29. Re:No Mac/Linux Support by quietbritishjim · · Score: 1

      The "nag screen" was meant to appear once after you used it for a few hundred hours or something, and never reappear (until reinstall). If it kept reappearing for you then either that was a bug in 0.74, or for some reason it couldn't save the "nag screen shown" flag (a read-only settings file is a common reason for this).

      I don't know if this screen is still in 3.0 basic, but if it is the same still applies.

  56. Use Miranda. by jaylen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Miranda beats Trillian hands down.
    Miranda is open source.

    Miranda seamlessly imports contact lists from Y!,ICQ and MSN.

    Miranda can use Y!,MSN,ICQ,IRC,AIM,Jabber and loads more.

    Miranda can run it all in a single nice window.

    Miranda has fully customisable skins and icons.

    Miranda has no adverts, ever.

    Miranda has plug-ins galore...

    Some of my favourite plugins are -

    CAPS_LOCK flasher - incoming message? Your keyboard lights flash.

    'WUMF' -Who is using my files? - Popup saying who accesses your files on a network and when, and will log all of this information.

    Postit notes and reminders.

    There are many more plugins.

    Miranda is totally free, is open source, and simply is better than Trillian, and even Gaim.

    Download it, no spyware, no ad-ware from http://www.miranda-im.org/

    1. Re:Use Miranda. by MoggyMania · · Score: 1

      Miranda doesn't support video; Trillian does.

      I don't care how much "better" Miranda is otherwise, I need a client that supports video -- it's been one of the saving-points in my (very long-distance) relationship.

    2. Re:Use Miranda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda's site is going under maintenance

      Miranda doesn't support buddy icons afaik.

      Miranda's logo looks like the McDonalds or McDowell's

    3. Re:Use Miranda. by Khuffie · · Score: 4, Informative
      Miranda seamlessly imports contact lists from Y!,ICQ and MSN.

      So does Trillian

      Miranda can run it all in a single nice window.

      So does Trillian

      Miranda has fully customisable skins and icons.

      So does Trillian.

      Miranda has no adverts, ever.

      Neither does Trillian (both free and pro)

      Miranda has plug-ins galore...

      Trillian has plenty of plugins, and most of them are actually useful. The whole list of Miranda's plugins is not only scary, but a vast majority of them are completely mundane.

      Miranda is totally free, is open source, and simply is better than Trillian, and even Gaim.

      Trillian also has a totally free version. Granted it's not open source, but why should we hold that against them? They've also been known to help out: when the folks at Trillian figured out a bug with the Yahoo! IM connection stuff, they sent the fix to the folks at gaim.

      If you really want to compare things, the 'out of the box' experience in Trillian is far superior to that of Miranda. I recall spending an hour on Miranda a couple of months ago to get it to look/work just right, and it still ended up looking ugly as sin. On the other hand, all I need to do is install Trillian, and a vast majority of these 'plugins' that Miranda needs are already built in.

    4. Re:Use Miranda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >>Miranda has plug-ins galore...
      >>Some of my favourite plugins are -
      >> CAPS_LOCK flasher - incoming message? Your keyboard lights flash.

      Dude, I've created a plugin for Trillian, that does more than this. It flashes all your keyboard lights (at once, or separately), and also plays sounds through your PC speaker. Plus you can have different sounds based on the contact messaging you. (Plus many more settings.)

      You can download "Message Notifier" from the Trillian web site or from my site for free: http://www.geocities.com/joshprogramming/


      Trillian has a ton of free plugins as well (see: http://www.civillians.com/pluginlist.php)

      -- Josh Rosenbaum
    5. Re:Use Miranda. by calethix · · Score: 1

      It flashes all your keyboard lights (at once, or separately), and also plays sounds through your PC speaker.

      Are the keyboard lights synchronized with the music? :)

    6. Re:Use Miranda. by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      I agree, it takes much more time to make Miranda as good as the (again, NOT FREE) Trillian.

      However, after you mess with it a few hours (or less, dependson you needs). You've something that surprasses Trillian in many ways, much more customizable and basically you get what you wanted.

      In Trillian it is much more fixed and like it or not, there's not too much room to advance.

      Also, specifically Trillian 3 really disappointed me with a BLOATED interface and sluggish appearance. I asked an IM, not a monster.

    7. Re:Use Miranda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Download it, no spyware, no ad-ware from http://www.miranda-im.org/"

      Wrong link. You want miranda-im.org/referrer.asp?who=jaylen

    8. Re:Use Miranda. by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are synchronized with the music actually. :) You can turn that off and have them blink in intervals, though. (I posted as A.C. before, and just created an account.)

      -- Josh

    9. Re:Use Miranda. by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1
      This is a repost of my message not using A.C., since it's score 0 and no one can see, and I'm shamelessy promoting my plugin. ;)
      >>Miranda has plug-ins galore...
      >>Some of my favourite plugins are -
      >> CAPS_LOCK flasher - incoming message? Your keyboard lights flash.

      Dude, I've created a plugin for Trillian, that does more than this. It flashes all your keyboard lights (at once, or separately), and also plays sounds through your PC speaker. Plus you can have different sounds based on the contact messaging you. (Plus many more settings.)

      You can download "Message Notifier" from the Trillian web site or from my site for free: http://www.geocities.com/joshprogramming/


      Trillian has a ton of free plugins as well (see: http://www.civillians.com/pluginlist.php)

      -- Josh Rosenbaum
    10. Re:Use Miranda. by m50d · · Score: 1

      With trillian you have to choose between plugins or free version, you can't have both (or couldn't last I checked)

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Use Miranda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use miranda - I stopped because it breaks *all* the time. So you either have to upgrade every two minutes or wait till someone tells you that you haven't appeared online for a week and they thought you went on holiday or something.

    12. Re:Use Miranda. by jazman · · Score: 1

      >>Miranda has no adverts, ever.
      >Neither does Trillian (both free and pro)

      Actually, Free does. After you've used it long enough, it starts popping up a daily reminder that the Pro version exists; there's only an OK button, and that launches a browser with the Cerulean website. Damn irritating IMHO.

    13. Re:Use Miranda. by quietbritishjim · · Score: 1

      Like I just commented elsewhere (argghh, double post!), this message was only meant to appear once per Trillian install and never show again. It seems some people (like you) have had problems with this in 0.74, but I assume this bug has been fixed in 3.0. If you still get it, make sure your settings files aren't marked read only (often happens if you restore Trillian off a CD backup or similar) otherwise contact Cerulean Studios to let them know this bug is still around.

  57. Other Serverless clients - Open Source? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The serverless component sounds interesting for those of us behind firewalls.. Too bad its not in the 'basic' version....

    Are there any easy to use serverless clients out in the open source world ? Multiplatform would be a bonus..

    Yes I can google, but I'm looking for reviews here....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Other Serverless clients - Open Source? by Trampish · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any off-hand but if you are simply looking to getting around the firewall, consider Your Freedom its a java (eww) based tunneler that gets you around firewalls without any trouble.

      --
      Yes, I want a cookie.
    2. Re:Other Serverless clients - Open Source? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, want to stay within the firewall and follow the rules.. Installing a jabber server ( or similar ) isnt practical due to restrictions from the security department.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Other Serverless clients - Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Tonic from www.r2.com.au

  58. Re:IM Chat Is Unsafe and Easily Read By ISP adms a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But seriously do you think people want to read your IM's about various geek matters? If you're that concerned about people reading your messages, maybe you shouldn't give your CC number to your friends.

    Seriously, if you got nothing to hide or to warrant being suspicious, the possibility of admins, the feds or even hackers reading the messages shouldnt cause much, if any, concern.

  59. Re: Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform by jZnat · · Score: 1

    I would definitely have to agree that the Trillian interface is bloated and too focused on visuals. This is how I feel about almost every multi protocol IM client for OSX too. Gaim has a simple enough interface without having to get caught up in the GUI just to talk with some friends.

    Also, the thumbdrive comment strikes up something I hate about many Windows proprietary developers: they do not save all the program preferences, data, etc., in your user profile (some keep it in the program folder itself, but that requires admin privileges to use!). Most open-source (and usually cross-platform too) developers know this and keep all this necessary data in the user profile, thus also allowing you to roam with it.

    Gotta love MSFT and its ongoing disregard for some sort of standards. Then again, MSFT isn't the only software developer that forgets about the user profile (since they didn't make Trillian...).

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  60. So Far So Good... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been running the Beta for about two weeks now, and I really do like it. I've been using Trillian itself for about 2 years.

    Honestly, Trillian was one of the first programs that I've used that, well, I was using a cracked version of... and decided after about 28 hours of use that it was worth my money.

    I am a happy paid user... 3.0 Really does seem to work better. The connection manager is MANY times improved. I can connect to all three of my yahoo accounts with no muss or fuss now.

    I will admit the daily (or more often) updates with the beta have been somewhat annoying, but it shows that the Cerulean team really is working hard to address problems.

    Still seems to have somewhat of a problem with deleting users from your list who are on MSN, but I can live with that.

    So far... after beating the hell out of it, my only gripes are:

    1) The default "user icon" display is set *way* too big for starters. A problem that is easily corrected by the user, but it certainly didn't make a very good first impression with me there.

    2) The new "Chat History" window and browser is useless. With it I can see the first line of a conversation that I had with someone, but I can't seem to get any deeper than that. Granted, there may be something simple that I am missing, as I have been concentrating the most on my primary problem,, which is...

    3) My webcam seems to be completely useless now. I've tried the updates, tried re-installing my quicktime drivers and codecs (Why God? Why Quicktime?) I've updated my cam software... and even went out and bought a NEW camera because the one I had was 5 years old. Still no good. I get a very nasty looking green and yellow window when I start my webcam, then the cam crashes. HARD.

    In fact, Trillian will not release the camera until I shut the program completely down.

    All that being said, the support staff at Cerulean have been very good at keep me abreast of updates and possible causes for the problem. I know I am not the only one with the webcam problem, but there seems to be little rhyme or reason for it.

    Would I advise my friends to use it? Hell yes! I do that on a daily basis.

    However, I am hoping that the news about 3.0 being released public is swallowed by the firefox wave.

    Seems to me that everytime something good happens with Trillian, either Yahoo or MSN change things to break it.

    (eep, after previewing I realized how rambling and poorly worded this post is, but its been the 48 hours from hell here, and I just don't have the energy to correct everything)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    1. Re:So Far So Good... by Khuffie · · Score: 1
      2) The new "Chat History" window and browser is useless. With it I can see the first line of a conversation that I had with someone, but I can't seem to get any deeper than that. Granted, there may be something simple that I am missing, as I have been concentrating the most on my primary problem,, which is...

      Just double click on that first line, and you'll see the rest of that conversation. I really like the new chat history, really makes it easy to find things!

    2. Re:So Far So Good... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well... Thats what I thought. But when I double click on that first line.. I get the next tab. No convo history.

      Could also be the fact that I had an issue not too long ago with tranferring the message logs from another machine. It's not that big of a deal to me. The Webcam thing is.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    3. Re:So Far So Good... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      Replying to myself here, but thought I would let people know something I just found out.

      My cam works. *I* just can't see that it is working.

      At least, it works, with Yahoo, through Trillian 3.0b965

      If anyone cares, This is what I am seeing on my end. (Don't worry about the domain name, its a Ren Faire thing. Nothing NSFW there at all)

      Yes, I know this is not the help forums, but I thought it might be useful if anyone is having the same issue.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    4. Re:So Far So Good... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      2) The new "Chat History" window and browser is useless. With it I can see the first line of a conversation that I had with someone, but I can't seem to get any deeper than that. Granted, there may be something simple that I am missing, as I have been concentrating the most on my primary problem,, which is...

      try double-clicking the first message of the conversation.. and viola! the entire transcript

    5. Re:So Far So Good... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      The default "user icon" display is set *way* too big for starters.

      Agree 100%. When I loaded up 3.0 for the first time that was the first thing I set out to change!

      Have you been noticing any connection problems w/MSN w/Trillian 3.0? Pecking through the support forums on Trillian's site, there appear to be others who have had problems connecting w/MSN, such as in this thread, or this one. I have a problem occassionally with some MSN contacts, where if I IM them, they do not see my messages, but if they initiate the conversation, everything works fine. There are a handful of folks where this behavior is fairly consistent.

      Anywho, my fervent hope is that 3.0 fixes this problem. I tried out GAIM, but gave up on it because it couldn't do what I needed (see this post if you care to know why it didn't cut the mustard).

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    6. Re:So Far So Good... by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Second on that history window.
      My logs go back to 2001, and trillian ignores them. Well, bits of them. It also ignores parts of the history it doesn't want to read.

      The search doesn't work consistantly, and I find myself digging up notepad, like in the good old days, to try to find stuff.

  61. You must be kidding by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You have a cracked version crash and hose up your system, and you blame the orginal company?

    What sort of bizzare thinking is that.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  62. Uh, one question. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Trillian is still Windows only, and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support

    Well, how would a Linux user be disappointed, not having anyway to know WTF the program is about or why it's so wonderful?
    I mean sure, it's understood that it's an IM program but so? So is Gaim, and Kopete and 4 or 5 other programs and they communicate with everything else out there. What's so wonderful about this one? I'll never know because I don't use windows. So, why the big deal??

    Not flamebait, just a question.

    1. Re:Uh, one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is flamebait because you didn't bother to RTFA. Kopete doesn't even support multiparty chat on AIM. Trillian does video chat across all networks that support it.

  63. Mac users aren't very interested in Trillian by devnevyn · · Score: 1

    There's not a Mac user out there who would possibly want Trillian when there's both Proteus, Adium and Fire.

    I've always found Trillian to be really bloated, lacking in features, incompatible and generally just an embarrasing piece of software. It didn't even have server contact list syncing! The new version looks promising though. I wonder if their Rendezvous chat is compatible with Apple's (it'd be quite silly if it isn't).

    -- Tested it--
    Figures, Rendezvous is Pro only. And yay, surprise, the interface is still bloated and designed by someone who should stay away from an interface editor. What the hell is up with a minimum height of about 100 pixels just for toolbar with useless icons, a tab bar that I don't want, a titlebar for a *window in a window* (who the hell came up with that stupid window-in-window idea, anyway?), and twenty pixels of font editing buttons (really, I don't edit my chat text often enough to need buttons available at all times)?

    Not only that, the View menu can only enable and disable UI elements that should be automatic (or disablers that are redundant - why would I want to disable the part of the interface where I read messages? The part where I write text? Wouldn't it then be smarter to open whichever chat part you're actually using (video, audio) in a separate window? (Think iChat)), and the Options menu presents me with *twelve* submenus (Who forbade option dialogs?).

    Congratulations, Trillian team. You have successfully written an app with an interface that is even worse than MSN Messenger's. Again.

    (btw, on Gaim -- Gaim has a nice share of features. I got my hopes up when I saw that its interface had been updated. However, that interface, too, is either bloated or just plain space-wasting, depending on how you configure it. That leaves us with zero (0, nil, none) chat clients with a decent interface on Windows (that I know of). Does anyone know of any reasonable apps? (Don't you dare mentioning Miranda) )

    1. Re:Mac users aren't very interested in Trillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of them have skins. I'm a trillian user and i find that the unique skin (yes the name is 'unique') in the blue is quite nice. VERY clean and the majority of the window is used for content. all the bars are collapsable except one that is 5 pixels tall. I'm quite happy with it, to bad this isn't the default skin :(

  64. Trademark issues with Rendezvous? by Ececheira · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, TIBCO has been using Rendezvous as a trademark relating to network messaging for quite some time.

    Will Trillian & Apple run in to trademark issues with that name?

    1. Re:Trademark issues with Rendezvous? by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Will Trillian & Apple run in to trademark issues with that name?

      Apple already has, and reached a settlement with Tibco back in July-- probably not coincidentally trademarking "OpenTalk" right about the same time.

      If I had to guess, I'd say all instances of "Rendezvous" in OS X will be changed to "OpenTalk" when 10.4 ships, if it's not already like that in the developer releases.

      ~Philly

  65. Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

    A plugin for Gaim already exists, at least one compatible with ichat.

    http://cr.yp.to/2004-494/gaim/0.81-src/protocols/r endezvous/rendezvous.c

  66. Yeah, I'm sure you were going to pay for it by drgath159 · · Score: 1
    I'm not going to get on you for having a cracked version, but I will get on you for blaming the company for not playing nice with your cracked version. You get what you pay for, in this case... nothing. Pay them and they'll help you out.

    Side note: It didn't work right installing on top of my cracked version, uninstalled, didn't work, then once I deleted the trillian directory and installed it again, it worked fine. Probably had a different cracked version than I did though. I never used the pro features anyways.

  67. Re:Serverless Messaging: Useful in Tibet & Wes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only works on your local network, stupid. Apple's iChat has had this feature for a while.

  68. Who needs Trillian? by wmich · · Score: 1

    "Trillian is still Windows only, and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know." If Trillian doesnt realize how important Linux and Mac users are to their future why should we tell them. Gaim is an extremly good program and improves with every release. So we Linux/Mac users dont need Trillian but someday soon they WILL need us.

  69. Re:Serverless Messaging: Useful in Tibet & Wes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another anti-Chinese post from this person, who seems to post in nearly every thread.

    Good to see. Keep up the good work.

  70. myxomatosis by jjwahl · · Score: 1

    Props to the folks at Trillian for their reference to myxomatosis

    Never knew it was a bunny disease.
    Radiohead rules.

    --

    You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say "that's the bad guy."
  71. P.T. Barnum called by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    he said something about suckers and time

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  72. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gaim vv is very very very slow... there doesn't seem to be any progres at all.

  73. Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha by devnevyn · · Score: 1

    The Mac app Proteus has an implementation of iChat-compatible Rendezvous messaging. It uses libgaim underneath, and much of its core is open source (last I checked), so either it's already in libgaim or you could check out the Proteus imservices source for the code you're looking for.

  74. Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha by typobox43 · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's fully compatible. :)

  75. Crashes under Windows NT by ZX-3 · · Score: 1

    It crashed on startup for me under Windows NT. Seemed like a DirectX DLL issue. If you are still running NT for some reason, I recommend sticking with Trillian 0.74

  76. Trillian Kicks Ass. by fbartho · · Score: 1

    the title of the comment is all that is required... I wonder how many slashdotters will purchase trillian 3.0 today?

    --
    Gravity Sucks
  77. Opensource equivelent by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 1

    For those of you who wish for an opensource IM application there is the GAIM win32 port.

    1. Re:Opensource equivelent by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      My only problem with gaim is I can't figure out how to make the individual contact name flash when i get a message like ICQ does. So I can click it and have the message pop up. That and I can't dock gaim.

  78. No thanks Trillian guys by aztektum · · Score: 1

    I get all my IM'in thru Miranda IM now Sure it's a bit of a hodge podge but it hasn't crashed or caused me any headaches in 3 months so far. I installed Trillian 3 to see wut was diff. (I used 2 for a bit). For some reason not being able to use the weather plug in w/o gettin Pro really bugged me. Otherwise it looks nice and probly is nice to use, but ya, not for me.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  79. Trillian is nice... but that lost me with that... by B747SP · · Score: 1
    Trillian is nice... but they lost me with that bug-ridden free version 1.7.2 (or whatever it was) that they left to stagnate for what must be a couple of years now, if not more.

    IMHO, it's too late for Trillian to claw market space back. As people have mentioned, GAIM is there, works really well, and is cross platform. Personally, I use Miranda IM now, and I run IRC, ICQ, MSN (bleh!), Yahoo and Jabber all at once (it supports many others, those are just the ones I want/need). It's current, maintained software (whereas I'm once bitten, twice shy on the issue of maintenance with Trillian) and I have absolutely no inclination to bother going over to look at Trillian again.

    It's also important to realise that Trillian is commercial-ware and that the 'free' version is, at best, a crippled attempt at tempting you to buy the actual featured version.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  80. Trillian works with WINE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know.

    Trillian Pro 2.0, for me, seemed to work quite well with WINE. It even emulated the system tray icon and put it in its own little window. :D

    The only problem I ran into was because of Trillian's support for transparency. The skin I was using had rounded corners and for some reason, the transparent parts showed up black with WINE. It seems that one could easily change skins to one that doesn't have a ton of transparency and use it. However, even with the black transparent spots, Trillian was still completely usable.

  81. Trillian FORCES you to use a skin. by falzbro · · Score: 1

    I have a graphite-like theme in windows. All other windows apps inherit this- but no, not trillian.

    Trillian FORCES you to use onf of their skins. There is no option to simply use the "skin" (or lack there of) that you are currently using, if you're using WinXP.

    teh sux.

    --falz

    1. Re:Trillian FORCES you to use a skin. by 1000101 · · Score: 1
      I have a graphite-like theme in windows

      what software/theme are you using? i've been looking for something like that.

    2. Re:Trillian FORCES you to use a skin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate apps that fake system widgets, and Trillian is one of them. So it doesn't inherit your system fonts, colors, sizes or whatever. You can skin it so it looks almost like a standard flavour of Windows, but it gets the details wrong.

      I use Pivot software to rotate my display for my LCD monitor, and it does a great job of relocating all windows onto the display when the dimensions change. All except for Trillian, whose faked windows disappear off the screen.

      I will be happy when the skinnable app craze dies and you can guess what a widget does without clicking on it or waiting for the popup help.

  82. Re:IM Chat Is Unsafe and Easily Read By ISP adms a by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

    Trillian Pro offers 128-bit encrypted 'SecureIM' on ICQ (and possibly AIM), which you can use if you're paranoid about such things (although it does require both clients to be using Trillian).

  83. Bloat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has some nice features but I don't like my IM client being so huge and bloated I have to close it to do any real work on my computer.

    I'll be sticking with GAIM.

  84. people wonder why wikipedia is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    when we have product comparisons listed in an "encyclopedia"

    1. Re:people wonder why wikipedia is crap by BReflection · · Score: 1

      so long as the fucktard trolls like you continue thinking wikipedia is crap, wikipedia will continue to be successful.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  85. What crack-addled moderator... by uhlume · · Score: 1

    ...modded this 'informative'?

    --
    SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  86. Trillian competes poorly with free (beer) apps by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Even if you don't even consider that it's closed source, it still competes poorly. It has neither any plugin support in the free version (not that it matters much since it barely have any plugins compared to e.g. Miranda), nor a history browser (what?!). You'll have to browse your message log as plaintext in e.g. Notepad... Oh, and did I mention they will give future updates priority only for paying users? I definitely recommend Miranda or GAIM instead unless you want video conferencing, but there are other free apps for that.

    I get the feeling the only reason Trillian is still used by quite a lot of people is because it was among the first multi-protocol IM's.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Trillian competes poorly with free (beer) apps by Satcho · · Score: 0

      Trillian 3 probably has the best history browser out of all three of those. What the hell are you talking about?

    2. Re:Trillian competes poorly with free (beer) apps by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Once again -- the free version.

      Directly from their home page about Trillian 3:

      Does Trillian Basic support activity history?

      Trillian Basic continues to support message history as it always has, by logging all messages to a text file on your hard drive. You can view the history with your favorite text viewer.


      And that sucks pretty hard.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Trillian competes poorly with free (beer) apps by blackdragon7777 · · Score: 1

      Umm the free version is almost nothing like the pro version nowadays. It has the best history browser ever. It has amazing plugins. Lastly closed source does not mean bad.

  87. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    While I do like Trillian it does have some bugs(features) that simply annoy me. For example it seems to remember your contact list. This in it self isn't so bad, but let's say for example you login to someone else's trillian. When I did this, it automatically took *their* contact list and assumed I wanted to add everyone on my contact list. Needless to say this wasn't desired.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  88. Re:Cheap hack of a skin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, worse.

    I kid you not--and I'm not trolling here. You can get Miranda to crash doing the most simple things. To me, it's an absolute kludge of a client right now, but it still kicks royal ass in many ways. I just hope that they seriously start getting on the development bandwagon.

    Yeah, I know: if you want it done right, do it yourself; too bad I don't have the time or know-how to do so.

  89. when non-free software is mentioned on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can grab Trillian Pro here and the crack for it here.

    Enjoy.

  90. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by squall14716 · · Score: 0

    You can use the multiple contact list feature. It's exclusive to Pro though, but it works.

  91. Re:Cheap hack of a skin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 'anything' as bad as an application using gtk1?

  92. TibCo sucks cock. Nice cafeteria though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boobz.

  93. What about Ayttm ? by SwitchBitch · · Score: 0

    It supports yahoo webcams, that itself made me switch from gaim to ayttm.

  94. to quote futurama by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    'he is technically correct, which is the best type of correct.'

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  95. Uh... so does Trillian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realise, only a couple of those points don't apply to Trillian aswell. Trillian can use Y!,MSN,ICQ,IRC,AIM,Jabber and loads more. Trillian has fully customisable skins and icons. Trillian has plug-ins galore (including some of the very ones you mentioned). Trillian has no spyware, no ad-ware.

    1. Re:Uh... so does Trillian. by jbarket · · Score: 1

      The difference you're missing is the important one: Miranda is free. Nobody is charging money for a more complete version.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
  96. Just Upgraded by bhadreshl · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just upgraded to Trillian 3.0 and let me tell you that I'm not amazed like I was with the 2.0 upgrade.

    First of all, the skin support is absolutely horrible. The last updated skin is from January 2004. My trillian 2.0 skin works fine although the some of the new options really ruin its look.
    After a bit of fiddling around, I got it back to to the good ol' look that I really liked (minimalistic).

    By default, ALL the IM protocols are disabled. This means you have to go in and enable them, which I found to be a little annoying for an expert user. Although a beginner would not find it a lot more complex.

    One of the great features of defining the size in pixels has been disabled which i really enjoyed. The main reason is because with that feature, you can just define a size and all your windows will be the same size.

    The tabbed windows are a great addition, but i'm more of a fan of individual windows.

    Overall, a quick looks shows great addition and bugfixes. I'll try using it for now, but I may revert to 2.0 in the future if things dont go smoothly.

  97. Re:adium trillian by cnsc1rtr · · Score: 1
    just use adium if you're in os x. trillian is obsolete.

    I got really excited about the news that Trillian was doing rendezvous because I use adium on my mac and I have wanted to use ichat rendezvous between all of my computers. I think this is the first windows client that can do it. Still have to wait on the linux one apparently...

    But rendezvous support is only in the full, paid Trillian version... great.
  98. Re:Trillian is nice... but that lost me with that. by okmnji · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's also important to realise that Trillian is commercial-ware and that the 'free' version is, at best, a crippled attempt at tempting you to buy the actual featured version.

    Oh yes, because heaven forbids developers from ever wanting to make any money off their work.

    Sheesh, you know, I love F/OSS, it is a great development model when it is done correctly. But sometimes, this whole sense of entitlement thing really turns people off to the whole movement. When zealots say things like "Oh, they're trying to SELL software, yuck!", the reactions of most people who live in the real world is: "So? Can't they make an honest living too?"

    For the people who are not of the "warez" generation, there isn't much of a problem. The old free version of Trillian (it was v.0.74F last I checked, BTW) was more than enough for most users. Pro added some goodies, both with 1.0 and 2.0, but there are people who have paid for TPro, and never use the "extras". It's called honesty, people liked using the free version, and so reward the developers with a subscription. But this concept seems to be lost on those that find no problem with pirating thousands of dollars of software (read: developer time), let alone a measly $25/year subscription.

  99. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by fyrewulff · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft shares information aswell when AOL/Yahoo lock them out of their networks. The last time Trillian got locked out of AOL, Microsoft busted through it and told Trillian how they did it, who then dispersed the info to other IM client programmers.

    --
    "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
  100. So what? by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trillian is nothing spectacular. Quite frankly I don't see why anyone would pay money for that program, with all the very good free-as-in-both-meanings IM clients that are already available on Windows.

    Note to all Mac and Linux users: you're not missing much, so don't bother whining about not having ports.

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple user here...
      I have a question.... Let's say I want my mother (who uses XP) to IM with and video chat... is there something better?

      Please forgive my apparent inability to *google* and come to my own conclusions without first requesting /.'s opinion. I think I spend w a y too much time here... : )

      "Note to all Mac and Linux users: you're not missing much, so don't bother whining about not having ports."

      I really don't mind... the faq on their site goes on to say...

      Can I video chat with a user running iChat AV?

      Yes. Trillian is interoperable with video chat on iChat AV versions 2.1 and greater.

      Can I audio chat with a user running iChat AV?

      Yes. Trillian is interoperable with audio chat on iChat AV versions 2.1 and greater.

      What's not to like?

      ---should be my signature---
      note: my opinion/ personality/ income/ sexual preference/ ability to operate a light bulb should not to be construed as representative of every other mac user.

  101. Slow...chat client? by Sivar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always thought it was absurd that a chat client would use 100% CPU just to resize a window, and have had problems with Trillian not painting its custom controls over the standard Windows buttons. The client works well, but the coding for themes, non-square windows, and resizing seems to have been done by rather unskilled coders. It also uses a hell of a lot of RAM. It's a freaking chat client, and it requires more hardware resources than my web browser.
    This is just my opinion, of course.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:Slow...chat client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you running a 486? I show now discernible CPU usage from resizing of windows and it is weighing in at a wopping 5,800 k of RAM used... wow.

    2. Re:Slow...chat client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you running a 486? I show no discernible CPU usage from resizing of windows and it is weighing in at a wopping 5,800 k of RAM used... wow. Firefox on the other hand is using over 60k of my physical ram and another 60k of virtual, and I have 4 mostly text tabs open in one window...

  102. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although I like Gaim much better than Trillian, I tend to use Trillian on Windows because Gaim for Windows is too buggy (probably due to the buggy GTK+ port).

  103. You should also complain about the ad.. by Santa_Clause · · Score: 1

    ..vertising they do by putting there name on the product.

    --
    Don't forget, Christmas is coming, and I check my list twice!
  104. PARENT IS NOT TROLL by dhoonlee · · Score: 1

    What the hell is wrong with you moderators? If a post expresses an opinion that you disagree with, just leave it alone. No need to moderate it down. God damn...

    1. Re:PARENT IS NOT TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the parent is a troll because he's wrong. gaim has spellchecking, has tabs (that work well -- i can't see how one tab is better than another, that's just stupid), has lots of plugins, has irc support, and the fact that he couldn't figure something trivial like that out isn't a fault of the client, it's a fault of his brain. it's definently a troll.

    2. Re:PARENT IS NOT TROLL by lightdarkness · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, I didn't say gaim sucked, I just said I no longer use it, and stated the reasons why I didn't use it any longer. And at the time I used gaim, it didn't have spellchecking, and it's plugins were very limited.

    3. Re:PARENT IS NOT TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gaim had spell check and tabs long before it was ported to Windows ...

  105. What about Jabber support ? by Ploum · · Score: 1

    The news don't say anything about Jabber support.

    I tought that Trillian was supporting it.

    1. Re:What about Jabber support ? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      It's available by plugin since 2.0 on Pro.

  106. Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha by leviathan · · Score: 1

    The last time I heard of this, someone said it was disabled because it is broken and never worked anyway. See

    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2 81042

    for more information.

  107. Kopete by c0p0n · · Score: 1

    Do not forget Kopete if you're a KDE user, it is nicely integrated with the system. You can compile it without KDE dependences (QT is needed, though) if you use another DE / WM. Not available for win32 withouth doing nasty things with cygwin.

    --

    Your head a splode
    1. Re:Kopete by m50d · · Score: 1

      Just to add to this, kopete integrates very nicely with gpg. Personally I think this is a better approach than trying to implement your own encryption protocol, as openpgp is looked at by more people.

      --
      I am trolling
  108. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by notthe9 · · Score: 1

    If you wish to do this successfully, set up a seperate profile for yourself.

  109. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    You can use the multiple contact list feature. It's exclusive to Pro though, but it works.

    Unfortunately this is indicative of Trillian... basic stuff is non-intuitive buried deeply or in the pay version and unpredicted results for everyday stuff. As sited in my example, Bob uses Trillian, but Mary uses it too. If both Bob and Mary simply login to MSN via Trillian their contact lists will be merged at least from my experience with the product. I believe that Aim, Yahoo, and MSN messenger all allow you to login as someone else and does not assume you want the contact list from the prior user. I'm not saying the ability to import contact lists from other users isn't useful, simply it shouldn't automatically query everyone on the list. I.e. it does shit without asking.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  110. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my ISP Admin wants to come to tonight's rave he's more than welcome to do so.

  111. IRC Support Sucks by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    You can't ban users on IRC. It does not let you use scripts. It does not have the most commun used commands on IRC. Typing '/whois' will not display the data in a useful format, but it raw server messages in the status window. I wish they will create a good IRC client in Trillian. For normal IM, Trillian is the best. PS: I hate hat it does not have a native interface besides the options window. I hate Watercolour, and there is not Trillian theme for the visual style I'm using.

  112. Windoze only by watsondk · · Score: 1

    and this is really a problem?

    as a Mac/Linux user, if this thing was ported to any of those platforms, it would still be of zero interest to me

    why pay for software when there are already free apps that have the same/better/more functionality

    on my Mac I use http://fire.sf.net/fire which supports all the common protocols

    then comes the UNIX varients, http://gaim.sf.net/gaim does just about everything and runs on just about any platform

    both are free, and after looking at the trillian site, its got nothing that would make me replace either of the apps I currently use

    if the developers of trillian want to only support windoze, good luck to them

  113. skinning? by nilbog · · Score: 0

    skin support, but no skins?

    --
    or else!
  114. We've got a great client... by unicorn · · Score: 1

    but you can't see because the site is down. But trust us. It rocks. Honest.

    Just a momentary glitch, I swear.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  115. Favorite IM Client by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 1

    Trillian has been my favorite IM client for quite a while. It has great eye candy, runs stable, supports skins & plugins, along with being able to get on all of the clients. You can get it to connect to 10 different types of networks at once, with the help of some plugins. (AIM, ICQ, MSN, Y!, IRC, Jabber, Rendezvous [Which is actually designed for hardware such as printers, etc.], Sametime, Novell, Exchange)

    It fits perfectly into the right hand side of my secondary monitor. All it needs now is Skype support.

  116. XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me or is Trillian 3 in love with Windows XP, MS Office, and MSN user interface elements? Gah. I both love it and hate it at the same time. The menu styling is exactly like that in Office. The preferences looks exactly like XP's. The buddy icon is based on XP's icon system. The contact list reminds me strongly of MSN messenger. If I didn't know better I'd say Microsoft bought them out and planned to ship it with Longhorn.

  117. Let 'em know... by gotroot801 · · Score: 1

    if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know."

    I did, by not renewing my license and switching to Gaim.

  118. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by gnarlin · · Score: 1

    Who the hell would want to use trillian in GNU/Linux to begin with.
    We have gaim, kopete, amsn and a bunch of others that I can't remember from the top of my head.
    Just suggesting it is ludicrous.

    Next thing you know they'll be suggesting using outlook express with wine!

    --
    A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
  119. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by remosain · · Score: 1

    "When I did this, it automatically took *their* contact list and assumed I wanted to add everyone on my contact list. Needless to say this wasn't desired".

    Yeah! I have a fiend that use to call that the "promiscuous feature" of the Trillian. It's really unsafe and the main reason of why I switched to Gaim when I was still running Win98 on my box.

  120. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Profiles are a nice solution to this (and implemented properly in 3.0). You can even password protect them!

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  121. but Miranda doesnt do videochat/webcam by g_braad · · Score: 1

    nothing to say more. subject says enough. Miranda doesnt support each services webcam support. i used the beta of trillian and could open yahoo's webcam and msn... although quality was a little more worse than usual, it DID work!

    --
    F/OSS & IT Consultant
  122. The point is ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    You have no sense of humor and a thin skin to boot. Ditto for at least one moderator.

    *snicker* *snort*

    1. Re:The point is ... by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Maybe your jokes just aren't funny? You're outnumbered 2 to 1 it seems.....=)

  123. Gaim rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cross platform software will rule the world...nothing less....open source even better!

    Trillian would be worth it except that i don't find windoze worth it so...

  124. Pioneering by superultra · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it Trillian that basically paved the way for multi-IM clients? I would suggest that if it wasn't for Trillian's (then) larger userbase you wouldn't have the interoperability that GAIM and Miranda have now. Could be wrong, and if I am I have no doubt someone will correct me.

    1. Re:Pioneering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not the case. I remember using Everybuddy five years ago, and that's when I was first introduced to the idea of multiservice clients.

      Of course, EB lacked any kind of polish (and stability) back then. It wasn't really ready to replace official IM clients for me -- I didn't switch to Trillian and Miranda until AOL decided that it didn't like the ICQ99 protocol anymore.

    2. Re:Pioneering by superultra · · Score: 1

      I guess what I meant to say wasn't that it was the first to have interoperability. I just remember them sticking up for it. Go look in the cnet news archives, and anytime AOL shuts down their service to other AIM clients it's Trillian fighting the good fight, not Everybuddy or GAIM.

  125. Re: Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's a fiction put there to protect them from being sued by AOL. It's really called gAIM.

    --
    I am trolling
  126. Re:Cheap hack of a skin. by m50d · · Score: 1

    Yes, applications using Athena widgets, which were a demo included with X to help you learn how to write widget toolkits.

    --
    I am trolling
  127. he is not correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    trillian is nagware, not adware.

    and you are a clueless, genetically inferior idiot.

  128. Re:IM Chat Is Unsafe and Easily Read By ISP adms a by m50d · · Score: 1

    That's why I use kopete with gpg integration. Too bad I can only get one other person to use it. Email is just as insecure, but you'll never persuade joe public to encrypt his/her email.

    --
    I am trolling
  129. Who cares about cross-platform support? by outrage98 · · Score: 1

    Why is cross-platform support such a big deal? All you care about is that the client (whichever client on whichever platform) supports the protocol, right?

  130. Re:Cheap hack of a skin. by GlassUser · · Score: 1
    No, worse.

    I kid you not--and I'm not trolling here. You can get Miranda to crash doing the most simple things. To me, it's an absolute kludge of a client right now, but it still kicks royal ass in many ways. I just hope that they seriously start getting on the development bandwagon.

    Yeah, I know: if you want it done right, do it yourself; too bad I don't have the time or know-how to do so.


    I've found that it crashes a lot less than trillian. And I use it daily, it's on most of the day.
  131. X-Chat for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm personally not so happy the Windows build of X-Chat costs money, so here you go kiddies.

  132. Not all software has to be free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference you're missing is the important one: Miranda is free. Nobody is charging money for a more complete version.

    Not all software has to be free you know. The reason Trillian costs money is because it is a better product. It's offered at a reasonable price - there's nothing wrong with paying for software once in a while.

    1. Re:Not all software has to be free by jbarket · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you. I think this is a point that's often overlooked here because of the blood lust for OSS.

      However, as Miranda continues to evolve and improve, the fact that it's free just becomes a better selling point.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
  133. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    Profiles are a nice solution to this (and implemented properly in 3.0). You can even password protect them!

    Profiles sound good if for example Bob and Mary live together and use the same PC. But let's say for example you want the ability to login to IM from a remote location without importing your list to the computer permanently? Unless something has changed in 3.0 Trillian doesn't handle this well.

    The point is even with "profiles" using Trillian assumes that anyone using it is a permanent user. It stores contact lists locally. Upon seeing a new entry it automatically sends out a request to be added to someone's list regardless of whether they are ignored or exist in your list already. It has no real provisions for a guest user to login and just temporarily use it without storing the list locally or seeing the contact list is "new to it" and sending out a bunch of requests to be added to the list.

    Unless 3.0 has a profile for a guest user that would not save the list, nor auto "be my friend" everyone.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  134. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by jsight · · Score: 1
    > The last time I tried this, running Trillian in Wine brought down the whole computer. I've been very leery of Trillian, and repeating the experiment, ever since.
    Have you upgraded your kernel, X, or drivers since then? Running on Linux, those would be the only possible causes of the above (and X only because of video drivers). This is definitely not Wine or Trillian's fault.
  135. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by zonker · · Score: 0

    he says that he needs interoperability with trillian secureim (i assume he's msging with other folks using trillain), which that plugin doesn't seem to have from a quick check of their website...

  136. Arrogant jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Trillian is still Windows only, and if you don't like the FAQ response regarding Linux and Mac support let 'em know."

    Cause god knows no one is allowed to stay on Windows, ever program absolutely MUST be made for every platform. I'm sorry but Windows is much easier to develop for and forcing programers to migrate is just, well, punishment. You dont go up to Miyamoto and tell him zelda MUST be on PS2 do you?

  137. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember centericq...
    for console! :-)

  138. Re:"serverless messaging" compatible w/ Apple iCha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Serverless messaging" is basically a hacked version of the Jabber protocol, so I'd check the jabber.org mailing list to see if they can help.

  139. What ya smoking, dude ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6. Fast/Efficient

    I really really really doubt that 3.0 is faster than 2.0, and 2.0 had UI, which was visibly laggy on P3-733.

  140. There's another interesting IM service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    called chattango - it's an embeddable chat window. They give you HTML which can be put inside web pages, and it renders as a chat box. They do not seem to be compatible with other IMs though.

  141. Wikipedia by McTimson · · Score: 1

    Wow, I just noticed the wikipedia links...that's a really cool feature, any word that's in wikipedia gets underlined, and you can click them to go straight to the wiki page, or just hover over the link to see the definition....that's awesome!

  142. windows guidelines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the windows guidelines?

  143. betanews, zdnet anyone? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    You know, they have software web sites for this type of news. I didn't realize Slashdot was in the business of choosing favorite software apps.

  144. Grab your torch and pitchforks! by Satertek · · Score: 1

    Look at their new options window. Now look at (or think of) Windows XP's new control panel.

    Watch for MS's lawsuit defending their 'Pretty Control Panel' patent next week.

  145. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yer gonna have to show some evidence on that claim...

  146. Rendevous?! by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    I know this is a big deal in the OS X community and this is the first Windows app I heard of that uses it? Is Rendevous:

    Not one of those Apple motivated technologies, just something they adopted early...

    AND/OR

    Are there other apps for other platforms using Rendevous as a prominant protocol.

    1. Re:Rendevous?! by merdely · · Score: 1

      iTunes under Windows uses Rendezvous to share music with Macs and other Windows iTunes users.

  147. profiles... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    My biggest gripe with Windows software is that some of it *still* doesn't use the OS' own %userprofile% but would rather implement its own funny profile management that typically needs to be taught where to save settings, temp files, logs, especially when you want to avoid writing to the app's own directory... and even then it's not always clear whether those are global settings pertinent to all users, profile-dependent settings, user-account-dependent settings... why? Is it too much to ask to honour the fact that there already *are* multiple user accounts, not all of them with admin privileges? Don't those look like a perfectly appropriate place for user-level settings? Is something wrong with that, or with me that I don't get it?

    Trillian, which I rather like otherwise, really confuses me there.

    1. Re:profiles... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      PS: Only ever used the free version.

  148. With WINE Rack for SuSE, it works perfectly by Jadrano · · Score: 1

    I'd even say Trillian runs particularly well with WINE, at least when it's used with Crossover Office. I use it with the Wine Rack CD for SuSE Linux, it can download and install Trillian (Trillian is one of the programs that are suggested for download and preconfigured in the Wine Rack version of Crossover Office), and it works so well that you would hardly think it wasn't a program written for Linux. It seems a non-transparent skin is used automatically if Trillian is used with the WINE Rack CD for SuSE, it is perfectly transparent and has its particular shape on my Linux desktop, and the system tray icon is not in its own window, but where it should be - in the KDE system tray, next to the Yast Online Update and Klipper symbol.

    The only thing I find odd is that, given that Trillian works so well with Wine, the developers do not compile it with the Wine libraries and create a binary for Linux. With very little effort, they could have a Linux version of Trillian, and even if the market share of Linux is much smaller than the one of Windows, it seems that this small effort is certainly worth it, and then they could offer the Linux version for download and write in their FAQ that there is a Linux version.

  149. Wrong in the FAQ: Trillian does work with Linux by Jadrano · · Score: 1

    I don't know how define "support", but Trillian works well with WINE, so they should write this in the FAQ. I use it with the SuSE rack version of Crossover Office, it's one of the preconficured suggestions for download and installation there, it works as if it was an application designed for Linux.
    It may be regretted that they don't provide a link to GAIM as a Linux alternative, but I find it even worse that they create the wrong impression that Trillian does not work on Linux systems - it works very well. Are they too modest to mention all platforms on which Trillian works?
    And since Trillian works so well with WINE, it would be very easy to create binaries for Linux with the WINE libraries. Some applications are difficult to port to another platform, but not to do so when it is easy is odd.

  150. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by blackdragon7777 · · Score: 1

    Everytime I use gaim on the lab computers, it screws up my buddy list by rearranging and readding old people > I prefer Adium's interface to either of these though.

  151. Re: Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform by *Pres* · · Score: 1
    http://www.trilliananywhere.com//wizard-1.html

    'Nuff said.

  152. Just a question (unsure of the answer) by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    Does ALL of the functionality of Trillian Pro work under WINE? For instance, does the video and voice stuff work? If not, an FAQ entry implying Linux support would need to be very carefully worded to avoid demands to make the missing functionality available.

    I suspect they deliberately leave it to others to indicate Trillian under WINE works without any risk of implying they will support it.

  153. Re:Trillian is nice, but gaim has cross platform s by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    You can get around this in Trillian 3.0 (Pro at least) by giving the new connection a seperate contact list - these are stored seperately from the 'My Contacts'.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  154. Eye Candy Sells by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    At least to the unwashed masses.. Its a simple fact of life. "pretties" equate to features, to those that are non techincal.

    Trillian is marketed towards those users.

    However, you can turn off ( via simpler skins ) most of the eye candy in trillian and clean it up a lot.

    Oh, and it does run on linux too, via wine..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  155. Eye Candy Smells by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Windows already has built-in theming. I change my Windows theme all the time, and expect all other applications to use the theme I chose.

    Firefox can do this. All Windows applications can do this. But Trillian cannot.

    They need to learn how to use the eye candy which is already present in the OS.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  156. Trillian 3 and Wine by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1

    I just tried Trillian 3 under Wine and it does not work well. Sure it launches but all the eye candy is borken to the point where it is unusable. Too bad, I liked Trillian when I was in Windows land.

    1. Re:Trillian 3 and Wine by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Ver 2 worked. But it worked better under crossover then 'raw' wine..

      Didnt have ver3 to try, so i was hoping.. Guess not.. Ill just stick with Kopete.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----