Slashdot Mirror


The VHS is Dead

Ronnie Coote writes "The UK's largest retailer of electronics is phasing out VHS VCRs. Sales of DVD players have outstripped VCRs by 40-to-1 recently. So how long until the mass market will be saying goodbye to the DVD player?" A few historical links to commemorate the occasion: Sony Kills Betamax, Why VHS Was Better, and How to Preserve VHS Recordings. For the future, maybe we'll have Digital VHS, but I suspect it will mostly be hard drive-based recorders.

470 comments

  1. Mandatory NETCRAFT by michael+path · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, -1 offtopic, but I'm kind of new to Slashdot and am wondering what's the deal with the running "Netcraft confirms..." jokes? I know where the "In Soviet Russia..." and "I, for one, welcome our new $overlords..." jokes stem from, but where did the Netcraft stuff originate from?

    2. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by oostevo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is so going to get me modded down for being off topic ...

      It's a common Slashdot troll (post with the intent to annoy), normally reserved for stories about BSD, but it's spread to all stories in the form of "Netcraft has confirmed ... (some random victim) is dying".

      See more information at Wikipedia's article.

      --
      In soviet russia, You ask not what country do for you, but what you do for country!
      Oh wait...
    4. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      This from someone with a Soviet Russia joke in their sig!
      At least the story is actually about something being declared dead this time :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm running NetBSD on my VCR right now, YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!!!

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    6. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can one up you. Someone out there with a wicked sense of humor is running a system out of a toaster.

    7. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by michael+path · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet it worked until you shoved that tape of Natalie Portman covered in hot grits into it.

      You're that guy who's friends with all those people I know in Cleveland, including my ex-fiancee. Small world.

    8. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0

      Interesting, have we ever met? Feel free to drop a line.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    9. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting link. Too bad the List of Slashdot Trolls doesn't really list any of them. There could be some real history (and current news) there.

    10. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If memory serves... when I lived over there Beta was the format of choice. I'm surprised VHS lasted this long...

    11. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by naelurec · · Score: 1

      No wonder its dead .. it was running FreeBSD .. :)

    12. Re:Mandatory NETCRAFT by MikTheUser · · Score: 1

      VHS is dead

      [Insider Joke] So is Karl Ranseier.. OMG.

  2. Please.. by russint · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please, spare us the netcraft jokes.

    --
    ^^
    1. Re:Please.. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      russint (793669) writes:
      > Please, spare us the netcraft jokes.

      Russint confirms... Netcraft jokes are dead.

      One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Netcraft joke community when Slashdotter russint confirmed that Netcraft joke market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all Slashdot posts...

    2. Re:Please.. by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      Okay, we all know that VCR stands for "Video Cassette Recorder",
      but do you know what VHS stands for?

    3. Re:Please.. by strider44 · · Score: 1

      DVD is the true successor then. Who knows what DVD stands for?

    4. Re:Please.. by class_A · · Score: 1

      DVD is just DVD. It used to be Digital Video Disc, then Digital Versatile Disc, but now it's just plain old DVD.

    5. Re:Please.. by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In Soviet russint, you confirm what he says!

  3. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Digital killed the video star...

    1. Re:sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I hate that song and now it's stuck in my head. All I can say to you is:

      MAUCSEKROAFT LSOPVAEDES

    2. Re:sad by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Funny
      I saw you on my TV back in '92
      Lying on the counch just staring there at you
      If I was young it didn't stop you coming through

      They took the bandwidth and sold it for low cost you see
      The internet burst in with and gave me kickass p2p
      And now my TV suffers it's redundancy

      I blog my life, bro. Why do I share so?

      Digital killed the video star
      Digital killed the video star
      In my mind, and in my car
      We outdo rewind with our PVRs

      You're not the first one. You're not the last one.

      Digital killed the video star
      Digital killed the video star

      In my mind, and in my car
      We outdo rewind with our PVRs
      The web it came, and copyrights it bent
      So get all your media through a bittorrent.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    3. Re:sad by el_benito · · Score: 1

      Oh dude, you forgot the chick's part!

      Oh-oh!

      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
  4. Netcraft confirmed? by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    Actually I agree, haven't used VHS in over 2 years.

    1. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by paganizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't like the ability of making recordings without worrying about DRM? That whole "if you can see it, you can record" it thing?
      This just means I need to look for a sale, so I can put a couple of boxed ones in the basement, to be carefully opened only after the current VCR is totally dead.
      Yes, I know that there are ways around DRM. but are they as simple?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Do you have a PVR? Would you say a PVR or DVD is the more direct replacement for the VCR?

    3. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by phreakmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Me neither. In fact, last spring I put a microwave oven sized box of old VHS tapes on the curb.

      Of course, some neighborhood kid absconded with it before the trash people came... I shudder to think of the education he has received this year.

    4. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      :))) no, I just don't watch TV anymore. And the movies that I watch are bought on DVDs. That's about it.

    5. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV anymore, so I don't care about recording. DVDs.

    6. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Very few VCRs can record Macromedia encoded content without additional hardware to strip/clean the video signal. What Macromedia does is add an alternating black and white stripe to your video signal that displays off the screen for most tvs. This "invisible" stripe tricks your VCRs auto-gain control into adjusting the picture brighter then darker over and over throughout the movie. The resulting recording is thus unwatchable.

    7. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      You didn't dust off the TV and VCR for the Farscape return?! I don't know what to think.

    8. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Macrovision".

      I wonder why no-one makes VCRs where you can disable the auto-gain and do it manually. I guess it's just something I don't know about video signals.

    9. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by paganizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strangely enough, I've never seen anything of Macrovision; I'm certain it exists because everyone talks about, but none of the VCR's i've owned seem to have problems with it.
      Just lucky, I guess?
      I just tested it, recorded a couple of minutes of chronicle of riddick from DVD; clear picture.
      I, of course, Immediately destroyed the VHS tape so as to comply with our benevolent overlords at the MPAA.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    10. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      I just tested it, recorded a couple of minutes of chronicle of riddick from DVD; clear picture.
      I, of course, Immediately destroyed the VHS tape so as to comply with our benevolent overlords at the MPAA.

      You not only did an illegal copy, but then even destroyed every evidence of your doing? This more than proves that you were knowingly doing evil! Expect to hear from MPAA's lawyers soon! :-)
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    11. Re:Netcraft confirmed? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I don't have a TV anymore, if I need to watch a DVD I go somewhere where there is a TV, and I definetely don't have a VCR :)

  5. Still for sale though by Heem · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It amazes me though that all the big retailers are still selling and having sales on VCRs.. I mean.. who still has a VCR? Even if you do have one.. why would you bother buying a new one?

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:Still for sale though by gordgekko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ummmmmmmmmm.....because you have a lot of video tapes that you don't have the time or inclination to convert them into another format?

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    2. Re:Still for sale though by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      casue some peopel have hundreds of tapes, and it's kind of costly to replace them all in one go.Plus not all of them will be replacable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Still for sale though by isometrick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My old roommate still has like 20-30 VHS tapes full of recorded-off-TV movies that he still likes to watch. (Shhh ... the MPAA's still watching out for those Bill and Ted pirates)

      He got his first DVD player in the laptop he bought at the beginning of this semester.

      He still watches the VHS.

    4. Re:Still for sale though by deragon · · Score: 1

      Because you want to record TV shows and VHS is still much cheaper that any of the newer recording solutions and VHS quality is good enough for TV shows?

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    5. Re:Still for sale though by Zackbass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A great majority of TV watching people both like the familiarity of recording shows on the VCR and are not ready to make the jump to using a PVR. Also, the process of being able to record a show on tape, take it out of the VCR and do whatever with it still hasn't become common enough or cheap enough with newer mediums such as DVD-R for many people to buy into it.

      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    6. Re:Still for sale though by flossie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It amazes me though that all the big retailers are still selling and having sales on VCRs.. I mean.. who still has a VCR? Even if you do have one.. why would you bother buying a new one?

      I prefer videos to DVD. When I rent a DVD from Blockbuster, I often find that the film just stops when it gets to a damaged part. With rented VHS, the quality may not be quite as good as the best parts of DVD, but it keeps running. I am also not at all amused at the inability of my (Bush) DVD player to skip certain content on the disk. For some reason, it won't let me bypass those ridiculous copyright notices. I have never had that problem with a VCR.

    7. Re:Still for sale though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I pass on DVDs and rent VHS as well. It amazes me how scratched and scuffed the DVDs I used to rent were. Don't people know you're not supposed to touch the surface of the disc? The ones I was getting looked like someone put it face down on the sidewalk and slid on it. Never again.

    8. Re:Still for sale though by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      HAHAHA YEAH THAT'S A KNEESLAPPER. Yeesh, mods on crack again.

      Anyway, we recently bought a Pyro A/V Link analog-to-digital converter. It plugs into the Firewire port on my wife's iMac and appears as a video camera to iMovie. Converting our VHS movies to DVD consists of:

      1. Open iMovie.
      2. Click "Import" and hit "play" on the VCR.
      3. Wait until the import is finished.
      4. Export the project to iDVD.
      5. Click "Burn".
      6. Profit. In this case, that means don't spend more money on the DVD version of a movie we already own than the cost of the blank DVD-R.

      The killer app for us is being able to move our kids' movies to a more future-compatible format. As a bonus, we can use the same device to burn content from our DVR without having to mess with its broken Firewire port.

      My wife mumbled something about "wedding video", so I guess everybody has their own pet use.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Still for sale though by northcat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot moderating is in the shits. Grandparent has a valid point and it gets modded down as troll. Parent is insightful or interesting but is modded as funny. I suppose most mods just look at what other mods have done and do the same thing.

    10. Re:Still for sale though by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a few very good reasons to use VHS.

      - You don't have hundreds of dollars, but want to watch shows at a different time.

      - You want to record an indefinite number of shows, but don't want to buy new units all the time, and don't want to "DIY".

      - You want to record something cheaply from your video camera to a format you can play at a friends house (say, a birthday party or a vacation, whatever).

      - The pricing of VHS tapes, per minute of TV recording can't be beat (yet). Even with DVD-R, at $1 per disc, recording to a standard format will only gain you up to about 4 hours of VHS quality video. A $0.99 economy VHS tape can do 6 or more hours of recording.

      - Ease of use / Familiarity.

      - Lack of trust with PVR companies (example, you don't want a nasty TiVO surprise of banner ads when you skip commercials, and when you learned of this, you no longer trust the company's products).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Still for sale though by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for something to use my powerbook as an LCD TV. There's a huge selection of tuner and capture devices for the PC but very few for the mac. I don't really need a tuner since my only input will be a satellite dish (composite), so how is this Pyro A/V link for watching TV? It should go without saying that I don't want to have to record the content to watch later (though having the option to do that is of course a big plus)

    12. Re:Still for sale though by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I don't really need a tuner since my only input will be a satellite dish (composite)

      Current models have a firmware problem that causes occasional skipping with composite input (although tech support claims to have a fix in the works). If your tuner has s-video out, though, you shouldn't have any problems.

      so how is this Pyro A/V link for watching TV?

      I've only used it with iMovie, and I've never bothered to look for other programs to access it. In iMovie, you can "Preview" the video source to watch it in realtime in a window, and this works perfectly well. The Pyro appears as a DVHS deck (I think), so any program that can control a DVHS player should be able to display the Pyro's output. Again, though, I haven't personally tested this.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:Still for sale though by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      My old one broke and after months of gradually replacing movies with DVD copies I decided it'd be cheaper to just buy a new VCR. I wasn't to happy to find out that they have doubled in price since I bought my last VCR and are now more expensive than many DVD players.

      For those of us with hundreds of VHS tapes it'll take a while before we can afford to replace all those tapes with DVDs. Besides why own two copies of the same movie when you can spend your money on movies you don't already own?

      I'd rather wait to replace my VHS tapes until the technology that replaces DVDs comes out. That way I can gradully replace half of my collection each time a new technology comes out rather than having to replace my entire collection of movies. When you own thousands of movies that can be a significant savings.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:Still for sale though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am also not at all amused at the inability of my (Bush) DVD player to skip certain content on the disk.

      Okay, I don't get it. What was with the subliminal Bush reference?

    15. Re:Still for sale though by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes! My god, someone else noticed that and despises it. The first DVD player I owned omitted that feature (It was a cheapo ;), but when it broke down... bah. Ever since, I've been cursed with unskipable, repetitive FBI warnings >:/.

    16. Re:Still for sale though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot, Bush are an electronics company.

    17. Re:Still for sale though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I have 320 vhs tapes and the last time I played one it ate my tape.

    18. Re:Still for sale though by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The R in VCR is for "Recording". I've got two tapes and just reuse them to timeshift. Such as when my wife or daughter want to watch a soap, I can record the BBC news documentary.

      I used to have a bunch of shows I was "keeping", but mould got to them, and I realised that I was never really going to watch them again anyway. If a HD PVR is as cheap I'll probably get one when the VCR dies.

    19. Re:Still for sale though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who still has a VCR? Even if you do have one.. why would you bother buying a new one?

      To execute your fair use rights, of course.

    20. Re:Still for sale though by Mikeybo · · Score: 0
      ...When I rent a DVD from Blockbuster, I often find that the film just stops when it gets to a damaged part.
      I used to have the same problem but after cleaning the Disc everything works fine. Now I clean it before playing the movie and have no more stops or skips problems.

      ...For some reason, it won't let me bypass those ridiculous copyright notices. I have never had that problem with a VCR.
      Fast fowarding these notices with the VCR isn't take more time or at least the same time as they'll play with the DVD ??

      I dont have to rewind the DVD before take it back.

    21. Re:Still for sale though by n3tfury · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't care about video quality, nor do you care about the audio portion of it. Bush dvd player? you get what you pay for. considering the amount of piracy, the copyright notices are there for a reason. you're in THAT much of a hurry that you can't look at that for, what, 5 seconds? i bet you nuke your poptarts because "you don't have time to cook."

    22. Re:Still for sale though by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Even with DVD-R, at $1 per disc, recording to a standard format will only gain you up to about 4 hours of VHS quality video
      Well, I can put 3 hours of DVD-quality video on a DVD-R without major issues (1 track AC3 5.1). VHS Quality (for whatever that means, let's assume 352x240x29.9 or 352x288x25) can easily fit 6-7 hours on a single DVD.

      I agree with the rest of the post though.

    23. Re:Still for sale though by s-meister · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Even if you do have one.. why would you bother buying a new one?
      • Because you have children with lots of tapes they want to watch?

      • Because your two-year-old son can handle putting a tape in a VCR but you won't let him near the DVD's?

      • Because regardless of picture quality issues you balk at the thought of paying again for the same content in another format, assuming it's still available?

      • Because you're getting sick of being sold the new stuff when the old stuff still just works?

        Other than these reasons, no, can't think why anyone would want to buy a new VCR.

    24. Re:Still for sale though by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just buy the cheap dvd players from asian countries that don't care for licenses and rules and stuff like that. I bought a $60 CDN dvd player and it is region free and lets me fast-forward almost anything. I can't always chapter-skip certain things but I can hit the 'play 2x faster' or '8x faster' button.

    25. Re:Still for sale though by flossie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You obviously don't care about video quality, nor do you care about the audio portion of it. Bush dvd player? you get what you pay for.

      Alternatively, perhaps I decided not to buy a DVD player (because of the aforementioned problems) but received one as a gift.

      considering the amount of piracy, the copyright notices are there for a reason.

      I don't care why they are there. I find them intensely annoying and have no desire to watch an industry's enforced propaganda.

      you're in THAT much of a hurry that you can't look at that for, what, 5 seconds? i bet you nuke your poptarts because "you don't have time to cook."

      No, I don't generally eat poptarts -- they are junk food.

    26. Re:Still for sale though by n3tfury · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, perhaps I decided not to buy a DVD player (because of the aforementioned problems) but received one as a gift.
      then your friends are cheap.
      I don't care why they are there. I find them intensely annoying and have no desire to watch an industry's enforced propaganda
      still a weak argument against a totally superior format.
      No, I don't generally eat poptarts -- they are junk food.
      your sarcasm meter broke.

  6. No it ain't dead. by waxmop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've rented so many scratched DVDs that at this point I rent the VHS tape before I rent the DVD.

    1. Re:No it ain't dead. by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention if you have kids...

      If I have a tape for my kids in the VCR, I can stop and start it right away, without having to wait for the disc to spin up, sit through advertisements, fast forward to where the video ended last, etc...

      Toddlers don't have patience for DVDs.

    2. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i were you i'd just change my video tape library. Good video libraries don't offer scratched DVDs, my dear.

    3. Re:No it ain't dead. by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      I've rented so many scratched DVDs that at this point I rent the VHS tape before I rent the DVD
      A machine with a good laser and mechanism can play disks from a hire shop with decent standards, no VCR could play strecthed, creased tape properly... I don't miss those black and white lines crawling down the screen!
    4. Re:No it ain't dead. by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      Not only that, a videocassette can withstand a toddler playing with it, standing on it, etc. Toddler gets ahold of a DVD for any length of time and usually it won't play any more.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    5. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, if only you were in a position to...teach them patience or something. But nevermind, you're just a parent.

    6. Re:No it ain't dead. by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Informative

      Man, if only you were in a position to...teach them patience or something. But nevermind, you're just a parent.

      Let me guess how many kids you've got...

      Zero, right? No matter what you try, most toddlers don't have patience. It isn't something you can teach a 2 year old. If you really think that you can, you've got a big surprise coming when you do have kids.

    7. Re:No it ain't dead. by decipher_saint · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can stop and start it right away, without having to wait for the disc to spin up, sit through advertisements, fast forward to where the video ended last, etc...
      You should seriously consider a different model or brand of DVD player, even my old '98 Toshiba has a "Last Play" button that goes directly from where the stop button was pressed. Some DVD players will even ignore the "stop" command that is prevalant on WB or Universal DVDs.

      If you are concerned about stopping a disc and putting it back on the shelf and then later returning to that spot, that's what DVD chapters are all about.

      Also, to my knowledge, toddlers don't have much patience for anything...
      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    8. Re:No it ain't dead. by SiO2 · · Score: 1

      It has been my experience that toddlers are equally adept at destroying VHS tapes. Once they either inadvertently or intentionally press that little button on the side and flip up the "guard," they find no end to the enjoyment of pulling all of that tape out of the cassette and onto the floor.

      Thank gods my son is 11 now and knows better.

      SiO2

    9. Re:No it ain't dead. by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Even better for kids, at least if they're responsible enough to not physically destroy your machine, is to store the movie on your HDD. It takes under a minute to get it going and no rewinding or advertisements (assuming you either ripped it right, or downloaded it off the internet). All it takes is a single command (ie., mplayer ~// -zoom).

      Unlike a VHS, there's no tape for them to screw up or wear out. Unlike a DVD, there's no disc for them to scratch and advertisements to watch.

      The main downside is that it ties up a pricey machine (compared to a $50 VHS deck) and you need a decent display, but easy access to internet downloads (or just never having to buy a movie twice if you use DeCSS on a legit collection) can recoup a lot of it.

    10. Re:No it ain't dead. by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      I've rented so many staticky, scrambled VHS tapes that even a scratched DVD is an improvement. Besides, Netflix only sends DVDs.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    11. Re:No it ain't dead. by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let me guess how many kids you've got...
      Zero, right? No matter what you try, most toddlers don't have patience. It isn't something you can teach a 2 year old. If you really think that you can, you've got a big surprise coming when you do have kids.

      It doesn't take having kids to know how to raise them, nor does having kids make you a good parent. While the anonymous parent may not have any kids, what makes you think he's never spent time with kids? Cousins, nieces and nephews, younger siblings, children of friends, etc; there are plenty of ways to experience child rearing without doing it first-hand. Moreover, if you can't teach your child a little patience and respect for belongings, perhaps you shouldn't have had a kid in the first place? The last thing this world needs is another parent (I'd say "set of parents", but that seems to be the exception these days) who can't control his ankle biter.

      For what it's worth, it says a lot about a person's parenting skills when they use videos as a babysitting mechanism. How about you try spending some time with your child, instead? You could certainly do that by watching a video, during which time you also teach him how to handle the media and respect your property. Saying that you can't teach patience to a 2 year old is a cop-out. Have you tried? Do you realize that sometimes you do have to punish a child? If he breaks a DVD, it's a good time to teach him that actions have consequences. "Sorry, but your <Insert kid's movie title here> is broken, so you can't watch it. No, I'm not going to go out and buy you another one. If you wanted to watch it, you shouldn't have broken it in the first place." You might feel bad about doing this, but tough shit. It's your job to educate your child and help him grow up into a responsible, considerate human being. This is a lesson he needs to learn sooner or later, so why not use this chance to teach it? Otherwise, you just unleash another spoiled brat on the rest of us, expecting to get whatever he wants, whenever he wants it, and damn the consequences.

      And before you lash out at me with your wonderful wit, no, I don't have children. Nor do I want children, because I know that I don't have the time or patience be a good parent (at least not now, nor for the forseeable future). I don't need babies to fulfill me or give me a sense of purpose, and I'm not poorer because of it.

    12. Re:No it ain't dead. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You haven't heard of chapter skips? Most DVDs are devided into chapters. Often this allows you to skip a five minute chapter with one button press. The menu often has an easy way to skip to a scene just by navigating through a few pages, and it often provides handy screen shots to jog the memory.

      Only rarely are the pre-loaded trailers unskippable.

      A lot of DVD players also have a "remember place" feature. Many of them don't do it automatically, usually one button press is enough, then turn the power off.

    13. Re:No it ain't dead. by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Have you tried VideoNow? I was skeptical that my toddler would have the concentration for it, but he loves it. Much cheaper than a personal DVD player and I can confirm that they survive being thrown onto a tile floor and jumped on. Several times.

    14. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoohoo! You said it!

      Ever been here? http://www.childfree.net/

      There's a whole lot of people who think just like us and don't want the stress and responsibility of raising kids.

      Besides, I prefer my cats. They're more cuddly, and don't demand that I buy them the latest fancy cat toy every couple days!

    15. Re:No it ain't dead. by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Zero, right? No matter what you try, most toddlers don't have patience. It isn't something you can teach a 2 year old.


      Sure you can. My daughter will be 2 in January. It is just a matter of not giving into demands. Screaming at the top of your lungs and throwing things gets you a trip to the crib or ignored. Silence and patience gets you a movie and a snack. It is particularly effective if she sees the snack first so she knows what she lost (if she lost it) and knows what is at stake.

    16. Re:No it ain't dead. by Osty · · Score: 1
      Ever been here? http://www.childfree.net/
      There's a whole lot of people who think just like us and don't want the stress and responsibility of raising kids.

      The concept definitely has potential, but unfortunately the list of links is woefully outdated (many redirect to off-topic sites, or come up 404ed). Perhaps this is an indication that we childless have better things to do? :)

      I'm not so sure discussion groups and segregated activities really help the cause, though. Doing that just ends up preaching to the choir, and reinforces the idea that there's something "wrong" with our lifestyle choice*, similar to AA or other "support groups"**

      * "Lifestyle choice" sounds synonomous with "gay", but there are many of us heterosexuals who choose to be childless as well.

      ** Not that there's anything wrong with AA or support groups, but a support group usually goes hand in hand with a problem (AA and alcholism, cancer survivors and cancer, etc). The groups are often intended to help "fix"*** the problem. Choosing to be child-free is not a problem, and doesn't need to be "fixed". Although, "getting fixed" is a good way to be child-free. (ooo! bad pun!)

      *** I quoted "fix" with AA in mind. While many support groups do work, and I'm sure AA has helped a number of people as well, I find it odd that a religion-sponsored, religious-oriented "support group" can be mandated by courts for alcohol-related infractions. As well, the "Alcohol Treatment" industry is hugely corrupt, with an astounding number of people being labelled "acoholics" with no real supporting evidence. I'm not denying that alcoholism is a real problem. I'm just saying that it's nowhere near as rampant as courts and "experts" would have you believe.

    17. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can. My daughter will be 2 in January. It is just a matter of not giving into demands. Screaming at the top of your lungs and throwing things gets you a trip to the crib or ignored. Silence and patience gets you a movie and a snack. It is particularly effective if she sees the snack first so she knows what she lost (if she lost it) and knows what is at stake.

      OMGROFLBBQ! A parent that understands! Holy crap!

    18. Re:No it ain't dead. by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Alas cats, unlike well brought up children, have a habit of choosing to urinate in the cupboard if they don't get what they want when they want...

      The old saying "Dogs have masters, cats have slaves..."

      Mind you, I have both child and cats, and it all works out well :) But I still like my VCR as there are a bunch of movies I have that I have no chance of finding on DVD in a hurry, but where I can I replace a movie to DVD. I like my 'extra features' options.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    19. Re:No it ain't dead. by dogmasponge · · Score: 0

      It is very easy to remove scratches from a CD/DVD. A litte toothpaste and a tissue can fix most scratches.

    20. Re:No it ain't dead. by spworley · · Score: 1

      A question..
      why don't DVD players have a small memory so that when you eject a disk mid-play, they use a few bytes for the DVD's hash (to identify it) and a few bytes to remember the position where you stopped (and subtitle/audio options). Then when you pop the disk back in, it's where you left off?

      I'd love this DVD player feature, and would pay for it. 16K of flash RAM to store the info for 1000 DVDs seems easy..

      The answer is probably something about the DVD licenses forbidding such consumer-friendly features. The DVD consortium WANTS you to see the ads at the start of your disks! Though I'd love to know if this was indeed a legal licensing restriction.

    21. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what you try, most toddlers don't have patience. It isn't something you can teach a 2 year old.

      Of course you can't teach it. Toddlers learn by example. Start by exhibiting qualities you wish your children to mimic.

    22. Re:No it ain't dead. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it works now but in about 10 your kid will probably have abandonment issues, neurosis and even possibly psychosis. My wife is a therapist and she has seen a lot of cases like this.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    23. Re:No it ain't dead. by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      My DVD recorder also does this. In fact, it remembers where you were on the last few discs you've used.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    24. Re:No it ain't dead. by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      Then you obviously rent from a useless place that couldn't care less about customers.

      You could always take a few seconds to check the dvd before leaving, and I've never rented one that couldn't be fixed with a clean from a cloth, sounds like whereever you go let's the customers wreck dvd's, most check them upon return and charge customers who do this.

      Find a new dvd rental place.

      Stop blaming the wrong people.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    25. Re:No it ain't dead. by Omkar · · Score: 1

      Look. He's a Slashdot troll. When is he ever going to learn about kids? On the job at Chuck E. Cheese's is my best guess.

    26. Re:No it ain't dead. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      A Lot of DVD players DO have that feature.. my mid range panasonic has it, and so did my older Kenwood. At a press of a button it stored the point you are on, and the state of the system, and if that disc is ever put back in, it will remember the point where you left off, just like a tape recorder.

      It has about 6 memories, though you can get other players with more memory

      --
      Have a nice day!
    27. Re:No it ain't dead. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      This has to be a joke. Do you think we (parents) should reward all bad bahaviors and should prevent punishment at all cost?

      Wow. What a bunch of crap.

    28. Re:No it ain't dead. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should all stop having kids. That way all humanity's stupidity and misery would be over in about a 100 years.

      Sounds like a plan.

    29. Re:No it ain't dead. by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It doesn't take having kids to know how to raise them,

      Well, yes, I used to think like that and I used to say all sorts of things. For instance I swore that I'd never use the phrase Because I say so as it annoyed me so much when I was a child.

      And then I became a parent and everything changed. In particular I learnt the phrase the terrible twos Simply to keep my sanity I learnt a number of tricks to placate the little ball of frutration that cannot articulate his thoughts or his needs (remember this is a two year old we're talking about - no language skills beyond the scream and the gurgle) And sometimes I used the video. To this day the Thomas The Tank Engine theme tune runs in my head.
      I don't say I'm the best parent but
      • The proof of the pudding is in the eating and I'm very proud of my teenage son.
      • you certainly haven't got the right to tell me how to do it.
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    30. Re:No it ain't dead. by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      My dad's Sony even remembers where you stopped across multiple discs. So if you're in the middle of movie X, then get an over-night rental of Y you can watch Y, then pop X back in and pick up where you left off.

      OTOH, if you walk away from a VCR and it gets to the end and rewinds it is a ROYAL pain in the ass to get back where you left off. With DVD it's cake.

      I use Mplayer to watch movies on my GNU/Linux system. It has three levels of "skip," page up/down, up/down arrow, and left/right arrow. Within about 10 seconds I can get to exactly where I want to be on the disc. Both faster and more accurate than chapters (unless you know the chapter number you want).

      -Peter

    31. Re:No it ain't dead. by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      You're one of Ned Flander's parents aren't you?

      --
      !hoD
    32. Re:No it ain't dead. by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Chuck E. Cheese's is probably a better place to learn about parents

      --
      !hoD
    33. Re:No it ain't dead. by Osty · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should all stop having kids. That way all humanity's stupidity and misery would be over in about a 100 years.

      Funny you should say that ...

    34. Re:No it ain't dead. by Osty · · Score: 1

      And then I became a parent and everything changed. In particular I learnt the phrase the terrible twos Simply to keep my sanity I learnt a number of tricks to placate the little ball of frutration that cannot articulate his thoughts or his needs

      Ever consider the possibility that you weren't cut out for parenthood? Changing your beliefs simply because it got "hard" doesn't sound like someone with the strength of conviction to be a good parent. But what do I know? I'm not a parent, and I guess it all changes when you do become one (*cough*crock of shit*cough*).

      The proof of the pudding is in the eating and I'm very proud of my teenage son.

      Ask yourself, does the pudding taste good just because you made it, or would others tell you it tastes good as well (and mean it)? What has your son done to make you proud, aside from springing from your loins? I'm not saying you don't have reason to be proud of your son; I'm just curious about what makes you proud of him.

      you certainly haven't got the right to tell me how to do it.

      So I suppose you pay for all of your child's schooling on your own, and all of your child's medical care, and his impact on the environment, society, and myself, however indirect is no greater than if he hadn't been born at all? Until the day comes that my taxes do not pay for your child's schooling, my insurance premiums do not pay for the cost of your child birth, your expanding family's need for increased infrastructure is paid from your own pocket, etc, I damn well do have a right to tell you how to do it. You're not parenting in a vacuum, and you're not raising a child on your own dime. While I don't believe it "takes a village to raise a child," (it takes two loving, supportive parents who aren't afraid of punishment when it's required), I do believe it "takes a village to PAY for a child." To that extent I very well deserve a say in how my money is used.

    35. Re:No it ain't dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't offer you kids food as a positive re-enforcement technique...

      Numerous studies have been done that show a statistically abnormal amount of people who are "obese" were offered food/candy as positive re-enforcement when they were younger..

  7. Damn it. by Elpacoloco · · Score: 0

    Personally, I refuse to use DVDs. They offer too little control for my taste, and frankly, I don't give two hoots if it's digital or analog.

    If this makes it hard for me to rent movies, I guess I'll just not see as many movies as before.

    1. Re:Damn it. by fireduck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I refuse to use DVDs. They offer too little control for my taste

      compared to VHS? the only thing you have no control over with a DVD is the intro sequence, where you are often forced to sit through the FBI/Interpol warning and maybe the distributors logo before the main title screen (although some are now including adverts as well). past that, you can just jump the last scene of the movie if you wish, far far faster than possible with a VHS.

    2. Re:Damn it. by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Ok, I have a dangerous addiction to analog AV but what the heck do you mean "control". You put it in your player and hit "play". It's the same in DVD, VHS, Betamax, 16mm or 1/4" video reel.

      DVDs are more tactile, easier to store, survive better than magnetic tape over time and don't require rewinding. They come with more content and can be played in a variety of devices including your computer. If anything they give you more options.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Damn it. by Chundra · · Score: 1

      the only thing you have no control over with a DVD is the intro sequence...

      Sure you have control over it. Just rip and reauthor.

      I mean, go make yourself some delicious popcorn while your friends and family enjoy the pre-movie entertainment.

    4. Re:Damn it. by Sygiinu · · Score: 1
      My old Warfdale 750 lets me fast forward/skip the intro and whatever else I like. It was sightly disappointing when I found I couldn't do that on my new one.

      I suppose what I'm getting at here, is that with careful choice you may be able to skip the intros on DVD players too.

    5. Re:Damn it. by Mant · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't watch VHS either, since that mostly gives you less. OK, you have to go through the intro on some DVDs (with some players), but the best you can do on VHS is fast forward through stuff at the begining, which isn't instant.

      Beyond that DVDs give you way more control than VHS does. I don't care about digital or analog as such myself, but I do care about image and sound quality and DVD is so far ahead of VHS it isn't funny.

    6. Re:Damn it. by geekoid · · Score: 1, Redundant

      until they turn off that feature as well.

      Can't get past adverts, trailers, FBI warning.
      don't get me wrong, I like DVDs I just want to remind people that the little control you do enjoy can be taken away at the discretion of the MPAA.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Damn it. by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, using Mplayer under Linux I don't have to wait for any adverts, FBI warnings or other threats the distributors tack onto the beginning of the disk to try to scare me into being a good docile citizen. Amazingly, despite this criminal disreguard of Blockbuster's attempts to force me to sit through the trailers for hollywoods latest slopfests, I actually often go out and buy DVDs - even after renting them! Wierd, huh?

    8. Re:Damn it. by squidfood · · Score: 1
      Beyond that DVDs give you way more control...

      Unfortunately, DVDs also give them way more control.

    9. Re:Damn it. by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the only thing you have no control over with a DVD is the intro sequence, where you are often forced to sit through the FBI/Interpol warning and maybe the distributors log

      Ever watch one of the older Disney DVDs? They used to make that "intro" into a 10 minute commercial for their other DVDs. It was just like going to the damn movie theatre.

    10. Re:Damn it. by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 0

      Thing is, if I'm watching a VHS tape, I can stop the tape and start it again at the exact second I stopped it at. With a DVD, I have to search through some stupid menu, wildly guess where I'm closest to (multiple times, most likely), and then seek to a spot that I hope is somewhere close to where I left off. In other words, resuming is a royal pain in the ass that makes it very hard to not watch the movie in one sitting.

      Granted, I don't really watch either nowadays--I've not seen a movie in quite a while, and I just download the TV shows I'm interested in, as none of the shows I'm interested in air where I live, and much of what I like are older shows that don't air anywhere anymore.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    11. Re:Damn it. by pyrros · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good DVD players (both hardware and software) will remember the time at which the last N discs were stopped, and offer to resume from there.

    12. Re:Damn it. by LordPhantom · · Score: 0

      Hmm... perhaps you haven't heard of features such as "resume" and if you're using a computer "timestamp"? My dvd player on my TV allows me to start up where I left off even if the power has been off.... same with my computer's DVD software in linux (and probably windows if I ever booted into it).

    13. Re:Damn it. by david.given · · Score: 4, Interesting
      the only thing you have no control over with a DVD is the intro sequence, where you are often forced to sit through the FBI/Interpol warning...

      My DVD player, a cheap far eastern thing, has a cunning feature where if you insert a disk, press STOP twice while the intro is playing and then press PLAY, on about 90% of disks it'll immediately start playing title 1. It misses the intro, the warnings, the menus, everything. It's great.

      Region hackable, too --- they know where the money is.

    14. Re:Damn it. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      They offer too little control for my taste

      Just get a GREAT freeware program called DVD Shrink. You can dupe your DVD's and rip out all of the crap that you don't want (previews, ads, inane commentary, trailers, audio tracks in other languages that you don't know, etc.). 95% of all of the DVD's that I watch are my own dupes with none of that crap in there. Put it in the player, and it plays. Very simple.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    15. Re:Damn it. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Has there been any Disney disks that force you to watch the previews and ads?

      Disney is of course one of the worst offenders for irritating drivel before the feature. That's extra special when you're a parent with young children and get to watch it over and over!

    16. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Survive better? I don't agree. While VHS image quality degrades over time, you can still see the whole movie. When DVDs get scratched, it's hard to persuade the DVD player not to skip entire minutes or go into a crazy loop. Just like the old analog records!

    17. Re:Damn it. by Elpacoloco · · Score: 0, Troll

      This would solve the problem. Except that I suspect it would summon the MPAA and their lawyers faster than I could say "Holy slashdot."

      Digital Smigital, if it does the five functions (and VHS does) then I'm satisfied.

    18. Re:Damn it. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's why copying your DVDs to DVD-R with "Remove PUO's" checked is a must with Disney DVDs. Put the originals in a binder in the basement. Keeps the kids from scratching the originals all up too.

    19. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mplayer dvd://1

      Any questions?

    20. Re:Damn it. by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Your comparison is skewed.

      If your tape gets mangled you will have similiar data loss. I can get a DVD disc resurfaced with either a home kit or take it to a video store and they will resurface the disc if necesarry (unless the gash is so deep that it actually exposes the disc to oxygen, that is). Conversly if video tape is mangled to the point that the player cannot process it I have to cut and splice the tape and the missing content is forever irretrievable. Depending on the severity of the damage you may have to dissassemble the cassette.

      I have also had cases where the glue holding the tape to one of the spindles let go, again forcing cassette surgery.

      While I agree that scratches in DVD media are more likely during the early lifetime of the product they are easy to repair, usually not severe and will not suffer data loss.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    21. Re:Damn it. by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      Do what I do: Put the DVD in, turn down the sound and go gather your refreshments, go to the restroom, etc. Come back in 10 minutes and the DVD is usually sitting at the menu waiting for you. We do this as a matter of habit now. -- Andyvan

    22. Re:Damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that we wanted to recreate the cinema experience in our homes? ;)

    23. Re:Damn it. by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      This is why every single DVD I own gets the "DVD-Shrink" treatment. (i.e. I use DVD Shrink to remove the crap at the beginning and re-record onto a DVD-R)

      Sorry but I simply will not be forced to watch those fucking useless FBI warnings/Macrovision crud/Company XXX logo every time I want to see the DVD contents.

      And on the one occasion I bought a DVD with adverts on it I took is straight back to the shop and demanded a refund (which I got)

      But if you think that's bad I actually used to cut the advertising section out of VHS tapes (which didn't make me too popular at the local VHS rental shop) Learn primitive VHS tape editing skills at home !

      To me it's quite simple. If you pay good money to be advertised at then you're a retard (uk sky subscribers take note - I'm talking to you)

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    24. Re:Damn it. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      mplayer dvd://1

      That usually gets you the anti-piracy warning.

      Then:

      mplayer dvd://2 - publisher's intro clip
      mplayer dvd://3 - another intro clip
      mplayer dvd://4 - trailer
      mplayer dvd://5 - another bloody trailer
      mplayer dvd://6 - interview with director
      mplayer dvd://7 - hooray! The film! Just one more thing to do...
      mplayer dvd://7 -alang ja -slang en

      Not all that convenient.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  8. Actually, VHS wasn't better. by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe in the early days of the video wars, but Beta turned out to be a far superior format than VHS. The quality was better, less quality was lost when copying, the tapes were a bit smaller, Beta tapes last longer, etc. The reason VHS won was because a Beta would only hold one hour and a VHS would hold two when they were released. Later Beta tapes would hold 5 hours in an extended play format, and they'd lose less quality in the extended format as well. Sucks that VHS had to win.

    1. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually, Sony killed Betamax in the consumer market because they expected everyone to pay them a license just to distribute movies on the tapes.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And JVC isn't getting royalties for use of the "VHS" mark?

    3. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by decipher_saint · · Score: 1
      The quality was better
      Actually that has been confirmed as an urban myth (probably started by Sony).

      There was a great article put out by the Guardian back in 2002 about Why VHS was better than Betamax that covers the whole "quality" angle.

      I am a Beta fan, and I too enjoy the various recording speeds, the size of the cassette and the wonderful shuttle control. I have three or four Betamax machines, two Betacams and a fair sized library of cassettes at home, which I still enjoy.
      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    4. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by neubottle · · Score: 3, Informative

      >> Sony killed Betamax That is simply not so. Sony's only license was on the shell. The studios made a business decision that the dual inventory of Beta and VHS was not supported by the low volume of sales in Beta. However the conventional wisdom about the market being driven by the T-120 VHS is absolutely true. Sony thought that users wanted to timeshift broadcast programs. They wanted that, but they wanted movies more. The longer lengths available on VHS opened the door for movies.

    5. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by shepd · · Score: 1

      And JVC isn't getting royalties for use of the "VHS" mark?

      And you have to put their stylized logo on the tape for a consumer to recognize it will play in the VCR?

      "Works with VHS VTRs" doesn't cost a penny.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Who confirmed the quality difference was an urban myth? I thought Betamax could demonstrate 330 lines of resolution when VHS could only do 250 at best. Of course, there is always possible variation between machines, on the recording and playback end.

      Mind you, I never owned a Beta machine, I wouldn't mind one but I own enough media formats, and SVHS looks nice for recording.

      The article was interesting, but it was posted a long time ago on Slashdot. The article still reads to me like something is simply better because it is more popular - the reason I say that is because infrastructure follows popularity.

      It is an interesting read, but I still hate to say something like MacDonald's is superior to Chili's just because McDonald's has more locations. So there's some fine tuning needed to fix that "whole product" explaination. It fits more things, but the situation seems more complex than that.

    7. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG. Do a search. VHS caught up in the quality camp BEFORE Beta caught up in the time area. THUS Beta lost.

    8. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by markimusk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just nit-picking, but comments like these kill me...

      "I have three or four Betamax machines..."

      Well Hell, it's a freaking Betamax, they are not that small, which is it three OR four???

      I can understand maybe I have three or four combs or shot glasses or something, but it's like saying I have three or four dishwashers... Hint: you either have three OR four. Make up you mind. Or go take a freaking inventory...

      Ok, I feel better now.

    9. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by julesh · · Score: 1

      All that article says about the quality is this:

      Standing in a shop at the time, there was absolutely no visible difference in picture quality, and some reviews had found that VHS's quality was superior.

      I'm sorry, that isn't enough to convince me. If he had done blind viewing tests with a variety of subjects then perhaps, but the fact that he couldn't see any difference on a shop's demo system (which was probably using a worn out tape) just doesn't cut it. Judging by his other comments, this also probably happened towards the end of the period over which betamax died. VHS systems did improve in quality over this period.

      As far as I'm concerned what killed betamax was unreliability. The betamax VCR my family had needed its playback heads replaced virtually annually (at more than the cost of a new VHS player). That can only happen so many times before you just go out and get a new one, and swear never to buy a Sony product again.

    10. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Fine I have 3 working ones and 1 dead one. I'm not sure if I got rid of the dead one or if its in the closet hiding.

      There you happy?

      P.S. I hear decaf is great for those shakes...

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    11. Re:Actually, VHS wasn't better. by markimusk · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I appreciate that, it really was bothering me. Your decaf suggestion probably has merit.

  9. Uhm by Ninjy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because something isn't used as much anymore by the majority of the people as it used to be, doesn't necessarily mean it's dead. A group at college that I'm in was designing a database for some rental place. We purposely included because we were certain that a lot of these places would still actually have tapes. And, after a quick check at a local place called Video Land, I confirmed our thoughts. Sure, it might be phasing out. But that doesn't mean it's dead.

    1. Re:Uhm by PMJ2kx · · Score: 1

      That's what I tried to tell my boss about Windows 3.1, but, oh well...

    2. Re:Uhm by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Just because something isn't used as much anymore by the majority of the people as it used to be, doesn't necessarily mean it's dead.

      I think you are clinging to one of the many meanings of the word 'dead'.

      For example, consider the concept of 'dead languages'. Latin, for example, is a 'dead language' but people still use it, and even though it is still in use it is perfectly correct to call latin 'dead'.

      Dead, in that sense, means that it is no longer used as a primary language. That could be said for VHS. VHS would be nobody's 1st choice these days, but it still has its uses.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    3. Re:Uhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VHS would be nobody's 1st choice these days, but it still has its uses.

      Not true, for kids you want cheap, durable, and does not get scratched to shit when you don't put it back in the box.

      VHS 1, DVD 0

    4. Re:Uhm by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Just because something isn't used as much anymore by the majority of the people as it used to be, doesn't necessarily mean it's dead.

      You mean... BSD... is alive?

  10. Re:Err.. by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting
  11. TiVo's the killer by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yep, hard drive-based recorders pretty much put the nail in the coffin. Easy to use, better features-TiVo and its ilk removed the last viable argument for keeping the VHS format alive.

    I, of course, still have mine around. I already pay enough for TV services without a monthly DVR bill... (grumble, grumble)

    1. Re:TiVo's the killer by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tivo is 200 bucks + subscription, a VCR can be had for under 20. (Blah blah mail in rebates and other book-cooking scams not taken into account)

      TiVo's not even in the same market.

      VCRs stopped selling about the same time you saw DVD players for less than 40 bucks.

      Hardly anyone ever used a VCR to tape shows, they used them to watch movies. It was always primarily a playback device to most people.

      I now have a DVD player to replace the movie-watching functions, and never needed the "record Who's the Boss tonight at 8" feature.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:TiVo's the killer by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      MythTV is better and free.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    3. Re:TiVo's the killer by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Hardly anyone ever used a VCR to tape shows

      Really? Apparently you know a completely differet sort of people than I do. I wonder who was buying blank VHS tapes a dozen at a time at WallMart?

      And, please, stop telling me how great TiVo is. At least until it is sold in more than 2 countries (neither of which are where I live).

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    4. Re:TiVo's the killer by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      I wonder who was buying blank VHS tapes a dozen at a time at WallMart?

      Small-time west coast porn studios.

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    5. Re:TiVo's the killer by Suidae · · Score: 1

      w.shaunmanning.com/)
      Yep, hard drive-based recorders pretty much put the nail in the coffin.


      Sort of. The thing is, when I'm starting to run out of space I can't drop 5 bucks at walmart and get another 25 hours of capacity. DVR's are nice, but it sucks to have an episode of something recorded when SciFi decided to a run two week Farscape marathon and it ends up wiping out everthing else on the DVR.

      It is still my opinion that cable providers should have a wall of these things somewhere recording every show on every channel, which they then provide to me using video-on-demand (Cox in my area already has this for movies, Cinemax on demand, etc). Now I don't need a big harddrive and multiple tuners, and I can channel surf and still rewind to the start of whatever I find to watch.

  12. Owell by infowar · · Score: 0

    VHS had a good run

  13. Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why buy a new one?

    DVD players are new(ish), so of course they're gonna outstrip VCR's in sales!

    DUH!

    1. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by mogglestein · · Score: 1

      I dont ... had one VCR, about 7 years ago that I got free from the college I was studying at (an old model they were throwing out). That lasted a year.

      Since I jumped on the DVD bandwagon I really see no point in returning to an inferior system. Ok I dont have a TV either (had a TV card in the computer but in the UK oyu have to pay a 110 pound licence fee, still debating whether it's worth the yearly fee) so dont record shows or movies.

    2. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who works in an electronics repair shop. He says he receives at least 5 or 6 VHS players a month; apparently they're still used. Besides, if you need to record video cheaply, it's your only choice.

    3. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I'm 34 and never owned a VCR.

      I hate all tapes. Cassettes, VCR tapes, and unfortunately I still have to use computer tapes for work.

      I'm patiently waiting the end of sequential media.

    4. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by archen · · Score: 1

      Because we need more than one VCR. We must have at least 2-3 so we can constantly pirate EVERYTHING. I have to copy every movie I puchase 3-4 times and sell them to friends who are more than willing to pay half price for a total piece of shit copy. It's just like the MPAA says!

    5. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the course of the last ten years I managed to accumulate a bunch of VCRs due to family members replacing them and giving them to me. Over the last three years they all broke, one by one. Now I just have a heap of non-functional VCRs and no desire to replace or fix them.

    6. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

      Tapes have uses. When was the last time you needed random access to a back up? You back up (sequential) and restort (sequential). Thats it.

    7. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Damn right. If it's local, it should be a block device.

      -Peter

    8. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be so pissed to live in the UK where the government controls the broadcast media. I would feel like I was getting screwed in the behind having to pay a surcharge for their monopolistic censorship of radio and TV. The BBC is evil for UKians. However it puts out quality news. I get it for free, at the expense of the UKians off the web. Har har har!

    9. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!! by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      No you've got it all wrong. You must have forgotten all the quality programming that has come out of the BBC over the years. Because they are funded by the licence payer they do not need to flood the airwaves with populist rubbish like the commercial stations do. Instead they make a wide range of high quality TV and Radio programmes many of which have been sold overseas and achieved legenday status - programmes like Monty Python's Flying Circus, Doctor Who, Fawlty Towers, The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Red Dwarf. I'm only listing the ones that I know have been seen in the US - there are many others: historical dramatizations like I, Claudius and Elizabeth I, televisualisations of Shakespeare plays and other literary classics, Dennis Potter plays and quality comedies like Steptoe and Son and Porridge. The commercial stations content is mostly quiz shows and cheap, unfunny, hackneyed, sitcoms made for the proles. Going in the other direction, it was the BBC that brought Star Trek to the UK, God bless them.

      (If you get a chance to do so, try to see the BBC's 2003 dramatization of "The Mayor of Casterbridge". It's out on DVD in the US now.)

      I have satellite TV in the house and yet I hardly ever watch anything but BBC. If the BBC stopped doing what they do, I would have to get rid of the TV.

  14. Not for me. by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not as long as I have my original, unLucasfuckedup Star Wars tapes.

    1. Re:Not for me. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just wait. In twenty years or so, Industrial L&M will put out "Star Wars Ultra Special Edition," which will be just the original version released again. Included will be dialog by other people involved in the creative process who were excluded from the "improvements" when Lucas became a megalomaniac.

      This will be just after Lucas' death, and will be shortly be followed by a series of Star Wars universe movies and cartoons that result from Lucasfilms finally selling creative rights to other interested parties.

      Not that television will be worth watching anymore. As commercial avoidance becomes more rampant, advertisers will switch to product placement to sell their wares. At this point, the major demographic in the US will still be the baby boomers, but they'll be elderly. At the beginning of the Star Wars TV-show, Obi-wan will mention to Luke how Metamucil keeps him regular, while also mentioning that he can still eat corn thanks to Fix-o-Dent. Vader will be shown putting on his mask, but not before they show the last stages of putting on his Depends.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Not for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be you... I have the originals on Laserdisc, and I've already transferred them to DVD.

    3. Re:Not for me. by jridley · · Score: 1

      The DVDs available on bittorrent, carefully made from the non-special(*)-edition Laserdiscs, look a heck of a lot better than the VHS versions ever did.

      (*) I think in the case of Star Wars, "special" in the sense of "short bus."

    4. Re:Not for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tee-hee. thanks for stopping by, sunshine.

    5. Re:Not for me. by vondo · · Score: 1

      Those movies are the only reason I haven't given up my LaserDisc player. I guess I should look for these bittorrent movies.

    6. Re:Not for me. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If you want to make durable backups, you'd better put them on film! It's the only format known to last over 30 years, besides paper*, in which case you'd have to live with the story boards.

      *or vinyl or stone.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Not for me. by colmore · · Score: 1

      Burned DVD of laserdisc transfer, my friend...

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  15. phasing out by MyOrangeJulius · · Score: 3, Funny

    VHS still has its uses, much like the audio-cassette tape. For instance, when I need a chuck in place of my Taurus' poor brakes, I just tape together three or four. Advantages over wood: -light weight -portability -fun for the family (depending on the tapes' content.)

  16. Betamax gets the last laugh by Magickcat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The number of scratched DVDs that I get from my video store, I think perhaps VHS was actually better. These DVD movies are just crap with their pausing and skipping. I bought a retail Lord of the Rings - Two Towers, and the quality and pausing on a new disc half way through were so bad, that I'm lkeaning towards thinking that we were better off with magnetic tapes. Perhaps Betamax gets the last laugh - it seems that it was better than DVD too. Add the problems with legal Linux distro DVD players, and I think the consumer has lost out.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    1. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a new disk is skipping it may well be your player not the media.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The number of scratched DVDs that I get from my video store, I think perhaps VHS was actually better. These DVD movies are just crap with their pausing and skipping.

      I used to think the same thing, then I got a decent player. Haven't seen a DVD skip since then.

    3. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Mant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try cleaning your DVD player. If that doesn't help and brand new discs still skip, try replacing it.

      Your experience is pretty atypical.

    4. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by shepd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Betamax gets the last laugh - it seems that it was better than DVD too.

      Soooory, not even close. I once did a technical comparison and Betamax is about 5% better than VHS (10%, maybe). It has a few more lines of resolution (220 vs 200, IIRC) and cleaner chroma recording. It definately does not even touch DVD for quality.

      You might be talking about BetaCam, which does compete with DVD for quality (although, again, doesn't match). However, it doesn't compete on price; a decent BetaCam VTR usually being in the $1,000+ range.

      BetaCam came out a long time after BetaMax was totally dead. Its VHS competition, Super-VHS, found a niche market in the homes of cheap people who wanted near DVD-level quality at a reasonable price (at the time). Also, it seems to be popular with very small TV studios. Super-VHS is not as good as BetaCam, although it is very reasonably close, and is about 1/3 the price.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by markxz · · Score: 1

      I don't know about betamax, but betaSP and digibeta are still used in profesional systems.

      They do have the downside of having bigger tapes/players (the last digibeta player I saw came with a warning that it needed two people to lift it)

    6. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The number of scratched DVDs that I get from my video store, I think perhaps VHS was actually better.

      Are you kidding? The sheer number of used VHS tapes that were pinched, stretched, demagetized, etc., far outweighs the problem with DVD scratches.

      Besides that, let's hope that Blu-Ray or HD-DVD makers get smart, and put the discs in a caddy (I'll support whichever side does so) so that they'll never get scratched or dirty again.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I don't pay for scratched rented disks. Nor do I pay for the ones that disable me to skip commercials.

      Do you?

      If so, why?

    8. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cheap crappy players seem to have a lot of trouble with certain DVDs. There's also the issue of the layer change; when this happens, pretty much any DVD player is going to stop for a couple of seconds while it recalibrates the laser to the other layer. I wish they'd just put in buffering in the player to get around this, or redesign the DVD so that the layer change is somewhere unimportant, like between scenes, or even better, between titles.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    9. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't work in customer support, do you?

    10. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Nor do I pay for the ones that disable me to skip commercials."

      By the time I discover this, I've already paid.

      What do you do? Watch the movie, then complain when you return it and ask for a refund? I'm pretty sure I could parley that into a free rental, if I pressed the issue, but when I'm bringing DVD's back, I want to get it over with, drop it in the slot and leave.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      Whenever I complain about a scatched disk, they offer to give me the same film again. Usually however, having to watch the Max Headroom version is more than enough.

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    12. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      I'll have a go at cleaning it, thanks. It was a pretty pricey Phillips player, so I expect better performance from it.

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    13. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, yes, I should have said BetaCam.

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    14. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      What do you do? Watch the movie, then complain when you return it and ask for a refund?

      Yup!

      I'm pretty sure I could parley that into a free rental, if I pressed the issue, but when I'm bringing DVD's back, I want to get it over with, drop it in the slot and leave.

      Fine. Pay to watch commercials. I'm not.

    15. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Try cleaning your DVD player. with a damp lint free cloth. Do not use furniture polish or other solvets, as it may damage the finish.

      Now I'm not sure if that will make it play any better, but it sure will look spiffy on the shelf.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Magickcat · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's the layer change on DVDs that really annoys me. How could they imagine that the average consumer would be pleased with this?

      On the Two Towers, it completely jars you out of the Middle Earth, and into "Swear at the DVD" land

      --

      Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    17. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by FatTux · · Score: 1
      Add the problems with legal Linux distro DVD players, and I think the consumer has lost out.

      On the other hand, ther is no legal problems to play VHS in Linux and - oh, wait!

    18. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by thogard · · Score: 1

      Its happened on every player I've seen. It takes a very good player to be able to cope with the fast pan and zoom sceens in LOTR and most of them show too many pixel artifacts.

    19. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      I rent about 15 movies a month through Netflix. Over the last three years, I've gotten 3 discs that wouldn't play (one of the three had broken in half in the mail). All the rest have been fine. There isn't anything wrong with DVDs. It's either your rental store or your player.

    20. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for. Buy a crappy DVD player, expect to get crappy playback.

      Manufacturers all have to support the DVD spec. But it's the interpretation of that specifics that determines the quality of the player. Also, some chip manufacturers for DVD players make a conscious decision to not support some of the DVD spec. One feature that gets frequently dropped is multi-angle support. What does this mean for the consumer? It is now necessary for them to *research* the quality of the item they are buying. Caveat Emptor. Same as it's always been.

      About the layer change: Most, but not all, DVD discs have the second layer recorded in a reverse spiral in respect to the first layer. All the player needs to do is a very small focus change and a small seek to find the start of the second layer. In the more spendy DVD players, they *do* have a good size buffer to eliminate the layer change lurch. The cheaper ones do not. Or they have slower seek times. Or bad optics. Or bad optic control. Any number of reasons that you may be seeing this. Only in a few rare cases is the DVD disc authored or pressed so badly to cause problems for a well engineered DVD player. :)

    21. Re:Betamax gets the last laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VHS IS BETTER! This is true. Except for Porno. DVD is better for porno because you can jump to the scene you want. We all know that porno drives all media because porno, and cute animals shot with a wide angle lens is top priority for the masses.

  17. Buy a VCR... Now! by nmoog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you've got a half decent video collection, then do your self a favour and buy a top-o-the-line VCR now... and treat it good. You'll never be able to replace ALL the vids in your collection. (And ripping them to 'puter is ok, but you'll find this weird vid at a car boot sale in 2014 and think back to this slashdot story...)

    You can still buy a good record player thanks to them bieng the tool of choice for DJs and hardcore classic moosic lovers, but if you want to replace your Betamax, thats harder... I think VCRs are more likely to go the Betamax route, than the record player route.

    1. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by swb · · Score: 1

      but you'll find this weird vid at a car boot sale in 2014

      Why would I buy boots for my car? And why would I buy a video from a place that sold car boots?

      Sorry, couldn't resist. I'm assuming a "car boot sale" is a retail outlet being operated from the boot/trunk of a car, and that lots of weird, unrelated things are sold, including strange old videos.

    2. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Funny
      What manufacturer/model do you recommend for a quality VCR?

      "bieng the tool of choice for DJs..." And what the hell are DJs doing with a VCR?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      JVC or Panasonic semi-pro units are the best idea, assuming you want one that is high quality both in terms of make and in terms of output. If you like you can even get DVD or MiniDV combo units so you can record from (S)VHS to those formats.

      Expect to pay at least $200 and $300 is a more realistic minimum though. As with anything, you pay for quality. If you want a real pro unit same people apply though Sony also has some good ones. Expect to pay $1000+.

    4. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 1

      "bieng the tool of choice for DJs..." And what the hell are DJs doing with a VCR? He were probably talkingabout vinyl players, thatstill are possible to get, in quite good quility too. Much because of them being a nessescry tool for DJing.

    5. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 2, Funny

      (And ripping them to 'puter is ok, but you'll find this weird vid at a car boot sale in 2014 and think back to this slashdot story...)

      Yeah right, like we'll all be driving cars in the future! ;-P

    6. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      And what the hell are DJs doing with a VCR?

      Probably the same things EMTs do with theirs.

    7. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I paid about $300 for a fairly decent JVC S-VHS VCR about 2 years ago and am very happy with it.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    8. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's amazing what great oldies still turn up in eight-track audio format in the garage-sales. :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What manufacturer/model do you recommend for a quality VCR?

      I can not recommend a Sony because the warranty is only 3months on labor on VCRs. I have a few friends who bought DVD/VCRs with flakey DVD players. Their warranty has expired.

      Been very happy with my JVC though. Mine is still going strong after 7 years.

      And what the hell are DJs doing with a VCR?

      Every DJ needs a mix tape to pop in while he takes a break. It's a fact of life and nature, it calls and you don't want to answer it in the booth. It's kinda rude, smelly and you might shock someone or be shocked your self. I know it was common place at one point for DJs I knew to use SVHS. But this was when CD-R drives were not an option and DAT recorders were a tad costly. Still someone who loves vinyl might prefer analog audio but not want to lug around a R2R deck.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    10. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention, real movie buffs only watch movies on analog tape decks, because digital players strip out all the warmth from the sound and video. Too harsh looking.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You know, it's sad but I've actually noticed the difference before and had a real moment of nostalgia for tape fuzz...the bluriness actually does add to the cinematography, it's almost harder to forget that it's fake if the fact that it was filmed as a movie is obviously clear...a test of reverse psychology perhaps?

    12. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      Beware of any JVC "prosumer" deck with a model number beginning with anything less than a "6" though. There are many complaints of poor flimsy plastic build quality leading to early deaths within ~2 years of purchase. The older JVCs and the newer professional models with numbers beginning >6 are well-built; others are questionable. Even their D-VHS line has had build quality complaints...

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    13. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      I'll take musical advice from someone who doesnt link to a story about bagpipes used as moose mating calls.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    14. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      And ripping them to 'puter is ok, but you'll find this weird vid at a car boot sale in 2014 and think back to this slashdot story...

      Yep. I mean, what am I supposed to do if I wake up in deep space somewhere, seventy-odd years from now, with a colossal medical bill for cryogenics and only an old video I made when I was a kid to remind me of my forgotten past? Travel all the way back to Earth with some bloody idiot cowboys to hunt down an obsolete tape deck?

      That said, I don't buy VHS any more. But the number of bloody anime DVDs accumulating in my room is getting quite alarming :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    15. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Bagpipes? Moose? :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  18. Not Too Soon by ggeezz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember some people still have large collections of movies in VHS format. I don't think they are going to rush out to re-buy all of these movies on DVD. Also DVD Recorders are starting to gain in popularity, but they are still a lot more expensive than VHS decks. VHS is still the most economical way to record.

    Dying yes, but not dead yet.

    1. Re:Not Too Soon by RatBastard · · Score: 1
      I don't think they are going to rush out to re-buy all of these movies on DVD.

      They said the same thing about audio CDs. And they were wrong that time, too.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Not Too Soon by graffix_jones · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a solution to that problem... and it's a pretty simple one: Netflix and a DVD Burner.

      It only costs about $1.50 per movie to replace this way (in the long-term, once you spread the fixed DVD-R burner cost over the collection of movies).

      Before I get labeled a pirate, let me iterate that I bought a license to watch the movies in question... they never told me I couldn't shift media. It may sound like a half-assed justification for what I do, but I'm not about to go out and re-buy all these movies I already own.

      Also, I'd say a good 50-75% of the movies I burn are straight-to-DVD-from-Master, so you get all the neat little blips, burns and hairs that weren't on the VHS tape (I guess they figure "why bother" with remastering, since some of these movies are so old.)

      My wife and I still buy new DVDs as well... in fact we picked up our copy of "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Askaban" from Wally-Mart this evening... (which it's now time to watch).

    3. Re:Not Too Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Recorders are starting to gain in popularity, but >they are still a lot more expensive than VHS decks

      Everyone Ive talked to about DVDs say the same thing. Most people I know have a DVD player on their desk-lap-top but not home and THAT was the main reason. "Why buy a DVD player? Ill just wait for the recorders to drop to under $XXX dollars and then Ill get one...maybe."

      In my case, I dont watch TV since I spent my free time here, at Fark and Pot-tv.net. If Im online 2 hours a night (Im no gamer), when would I have time to watch TV?

      Anyways, I D/L King of Hill and the Simpsons online and get to watch an hour of tv a week in 40mins with no commercials.

      If geeks, gamers and pr0n addicts also spend their time watching DVD's when they hell do they have time to meet wo....

      never mind, just realized what forum this is.

      zeke

  19. They're still cost effective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Unless you have a big screen TV, the qualit of VHS is noticeable but almot a non-issue when it comes to recording a TV show. Until I got my DVR Lyra I still used a VCR even to record HDTV shows off of sattelite. They are fast easy and most importantly cheap. 40 dollar deck 2 dollar tape, you can catch that show that you want to see after you get back from whatever it is you're running off to. And best of all, NO MONTHLY FEE!

    1. Re:They're still cost effective. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still use my VCR for recording.
      It's cheap and it works.
      One day it will break down, and then I'll consider recordable DVDs or some Hard disk gadget. But for now it does the job.

      But I wouldnt buy a new one.

    2. Re:They're still cost effective. by timthorn · · Score: 1

      For NTSC maybe - the degredation is significant from PAL transmissions. I'm addicted to my Freeview PVR now though - bit accurate off air MPEG2. Almost!

  20. Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can honestly say that I won't miss VHS. I stopped recording stuff to my VCR almost 2 years ago when TiVOs, recordable DVDs, etc. starting coming out. I've just been too poor to plunk down and pay the lifetime fee for a TiVO or build my own PVR.

    However, when I started to craft this reply -- something struck me -- VHS doesn't have DRM that prevents it from recording stuff. Or being passed around with friends. Etc., etc., etc.

    Yes, you can't use a VCR to decode a DirecTV signal without a DirecTV receiver, and that might be poor man's DRM. I don't know -- were there ever VCR + sat. receivers?

    And popping the write protection tab on a tape isn't so much DRM as "honey, don't you even think about taping that football game over our wedding video."

    VHS was mainstream, you could record most anything that you could get a signal into the VCR, and you could pass it around at leisure. There was talk about digital VCRs coming out in the future that would tag copyrighted broadcasts, I think, and would basically introduce VHS DRM, but for the most part, it's been DRM free, right?

    Now, we have TiVOs that are getting more and more restrictive or control happy (for the average consumer -- maybe not /. TiVO mavens), DVDs that can't be copied to preserve a copy, and homebuilt PVRs that may become illegal to use to skip commercials or obsolete if content providers start ramping up DRM efforts on the signal level.

    I hated using VHS tapes, but they were pretty no-nonsense. Ahhh...the good ol' days. Now I must go back to finding some money to build a PVR, buy a TiVO, pay off my wife when I get an HDTV for the living room, etc.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Please think. How would you seriously enforce DRM in 1976 when VHS was introduced? Do you think that the movie studios wouldn't of put DRM if they could of?

      Seriously, back in 1976 the computing power of one $20 DVD player probably outstripped every computer in the world then. It would not be feasiable to apply a 56bit encryption algorithm on it, or anything like the 2048bit encryption that will be on your soon-to-come HD-DVD. That will be probably, incredibly hard to crack. Then again, it'll probably have a stupid flaw that renders it useless within the first week of it being out.

    2. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But VHS does have rights management, it's just analog, not digital. It's called macrovision and if the recording unit has macrovision, which most of them do, it will a second generation recording unusable - if it doesn't have macrovision it still might ruin or at least degrade the picture.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by MHerrington · · Score: 0

      actually, there were vhs+ sat receivers, they were for directv, and i have several of them

    4. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by suyashs · · Score: 1

      Or a distributed computing worm designed to spread and crack HD-DVD protection super quick by spreading to unsuspecting computers. Sounds like a worthy cause to me...

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    5. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never heard of Macrovision... VHS DRM.

      Sure, if you record it yourself, you don't have the DRM, but that's true of DVDs, and anything else as well.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by scribblej · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... Macrovision?

    7. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC the Grammer Nazi says: "wouldn't have used DRM if they couldn't have."

    8. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the digital kind can be defeated with a trivial download of the proper software, while the analog kind requires either the purchase (or construction) of an elaborate piece of equipment or an old VCR.

    9. Re:Biggest plus about VHS -- DRM couldn't touch it by seymansey · · Score: 1

      -- were there ever VCR + sat. receivers? Sure thing - i've got two old & broken sky analogue / VHS combos stashed away at home. Used to come in extremely handy when we had Sky Movies ;)

  21. As long as I can buy VHS tapes by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will never be completely dead. I'm planning to stash a couple decks for the future when people want their grandparents old VHS tapes duped to whatever storage medium is popular then.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:As long as I can buy VHS tapes by lew3004 · · Score: 1

      Kinda like the old 1.5 x 1.5 8.5mm projector screens. I love it! I'm stocking up too!

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
    2. Re:As long as I can buy VHS tapes by arivanov · · Score: 1
      It is obvious that you have never had to deal with tapes and backups for a living.

      The shelf life of an unused VHS tape is between 5 and 7 years which is quite a lot compared to things like DAT or Travan, but still not even close to the age necessary for long term archiving. Cross-magnetisation or whatever it is called. Neigbouring magnetic layers influence each other which results in the magnetic particles changing their orientation. It is he bane of any tape medium and there is nothing you can do about it for analogue recordings. So your tapes are not going to be useable to be dumped to any medium. That is besides the fact that 7-10 years are enough for the plastic carrier to become brittle and start flaking the magnetic covering or breaking at random.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  22. Chinese, not DVD, killed VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The reality is that the Chinese killed VHS. The Chinese factories simply churn out so many DVD players that they are no more expensive than a VHS player.

    There are other examples of how the Chinese have altered the landscape of history.

    Linux is having a tough time in gaining traction in China because piracy is so severe that both Solaris and Windows XP are essentially free. How can Linux compete against them?

    1. Re:Chinese, not DVD, killed VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT was your link? WHOOO, you need to find something better to do.

    2. Re:Chinese, not DVD, killed VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If VHS were killed, that would be the decision made by the movie industry, not chinese. The chinese didn't kill VHS. The reality is that you can have VHS, plus a dvd player at the same time, thanks to chinese cheap labor.

  23. And about time too by e6003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    VHS was kind of good for the 1980s - but now it's rather showing its age. If S-VHS (and S-VHS ET, which allows you to record S-VHS standard recordings on decent high-grade VHS tapes) had come earlier to market we might have been a bit better off. It seems that electronic picture enhancement systems from Betamax could have been applied to VHS as well (but weren't). There is still something very clunky about using cassettes the size of paperback books to record on, when recordable disc technology exists. Even though you can still buy brand-name VCRs (like Sony), they aren't made by Sony any more.

  24. I think this is a mistake... by ragingtory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The primary use of a VCR is no longer watching videos - but recording things. DVD Recorders are not yet at a price point that makes it affordable for consumers - nor do we have a standard in place for the type of DVD to be recording to. Until DVD recorders reach a price point that is affordable for the average consumers, there will still be considerable demand for VHS to record television. I don't see digital recorders (Tivo, etc) at that point yet either.

    1. Re:I think this is a mistake... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      You can't afford 250UKP for a Philips DVD recorder? My last VCR cost 400UKP in 1997. It's just that VCRs (and pre-recorded tapes) have collapsed in price since the late 1990s because the manufacturers can see the writing on the wall.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:I think this is a mistake... by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      I want to tape some TeeVee. I go into my favourite electronics retailer "Hello my good man - I know jack about shit - I want to tape my soaps while skiing this Xmas? What should I buy"

      Store can say one of two things:
      "This VCR costing $50 will suit you perfectly - and tapes are cheap - so you will spend less than a mornings ski pass on your complete solution"

      or

      "Really you need either a TiVo / PVR or a DVD recorder - these are like amazing - and great value at just $500. Do you have a wide / HD TeeVee?? No?? Holy shit your out of date - we have a special bundle on right now with this sweeeet teeeveee and this combined dvd recorder PVR with a hard drive and added conformity for just $1500 which will stop you walking out of here with laughter in the background.... you like? yeah... did I mention the home cinema kit - you get about 300 speakers with this and you can actually hear people fart BEHIND you in some movies its amazing..."

      I'm guessing they go for the more expensive and profitable option. Easier to do if they can back it up with

      'VCR??? no one makes THOSE anymore you throwback freak'

    3. Re:I think this is a mistake... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Tivo spanks VHS recordings, however, you don't have to pay for your VCR and then pay $4.95/month for the privelage of using it.

      I would have had a Tivo long ago, but I'm sick of every company of the farking planet trying to nickel and dime more monthly payments out of me every month. Pretty soon refrigerators and toasters are going to require a monthly payment. Perhaps I can just forward my entire paycheck to an escrow account the divides it among all the major manufacturers every month.

      /seriously needs to look into MythTV

    4. Re:I think this is a mistake... by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

      You and me both buddy!

      When I purchased my Tivo for myself I bit the bullet and payed for the lifetime subscription. As much as I use the thing, this was definitely the better value for me. The year I bought a Tivo for my parents, I did the same thing. It's cruel (IMO) to give a gift that has a monthly charge (unless you ask them first).

      Not sure if Tivo even offers that lifetime subscription anymore. I realize that most purchasers won't have the upfront funds to pay for it anyway, and Tivo was counting on that.

  25. VHS is far from dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After all, with all those cryptic DRMs manufacturers shoving through the consumers, and all the frenzy DVD format wars (DVD+-RW/HD-DVD/DVD-A/DVD-RAM/etc.), nobody's gonna abandon the tape recorder anytime soon. Maybe not making or buying new ones, but they are gonna keep replenishing the VHS tapes and fixing old units.

  26. Still use it by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once in a while, there will be a show on TV I'd like to watch, but am too occupied with other things to pay enough attention. If I know this will happen, I'll pop a trusty old VHS tape into my trusty old VCR, hit record, and forget about it until the end of the show. Later that evening/day/week, I hit rewind, wait a minute or so, and watch what I missed.

    I know PVRs are capable of this as well, and yes, I have a computer with an All-in-Wonder 9700 that I use extensively for video capture, but

    1) I'm in linux 95% of the time I'm on my computer, and Rage Theater II chips aren't supported yet. (Yes, I can get some decent capture cards supported under linux but at present my VCR just works without tweaking drivers or anything)

    2) In Windows, I take a noticeable performance hit capturing video, and if I do anything to put pressure on the CPU, I'll get dropped frames. (When was the last time you got dropped frames on a VCR?)

    and 3) I'd have to go through another step in burning the file to DVD/CD to make it portable/archivable. (Just pop the tape out and take it to a friends house right after recording)

    While the format of VHS may be phased out in terms of new product releases, the relative quality (with decent quality tapes) and reliability of the machinery has earned a place in my room. I've never had dropped frames, codec/compressor incompatibilities, or my TV lock up while I'm recording with a VCR. Yes, I know I can buy a tivo, but I don't feel like spending that money when I have something that works fine at the moment. I don't plan to buy any new release movies on VHS, but I do occasionally pick up a few blanks in case something comes on I'd like to watch, without buying any new equipment.

    1. Re:Still use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What amazes me about Americalandians (I'm in the UK) is that timeshifting does not seem to be part of the culture at all. I've never known anyone posting here from the U.S to conceive of setting the timer on their VCR: these days you probably all have TiVos etc. but only last week someone in all honesty posted that they had no choice to miss a show because they were nowhere near a TV when it was transmitted.

      A top for the future: those things you call fawcets: water comes out of them; they are not just for hanging dishcloths on.

    2. Re:Still use it by julesh · · Score: 1

      2) In Windows, I take a noticeable performance hit capturing video, and if I do anything to put pressure on the CPU, I'll get dropped frames. (When was the last time you got dropped frames on a VCR?)

      When was the last time you used a VCR for doing something else at the same time as you were making a recording?

      A PC capable of doing video recording/playback costs about the same as a decent VCR. Get one. Use it only for that. You'll find it works much better.

    3. Re:Still use it by Politburo · · Score: 1

      if I do anything to put pressure on the CPU, I'll get dropped frames

      Have you tried adjusting the process priority in the Task Manager? It would make your computer less usable during capture, but might prevent dropped frames. That assumes that the frame drop is coming from context switches as Windows switches processes.

  27. Re:The UKs largest retailer by radish · · Score: 1

    Harrod's?? That's one store, in London. How can one store possibly qualify as "The UKs largest retailer"? If you were to RTFA, you'd see it's talking about Dixons, which is the largest electronics chain in the UK and one of the largest in Europe. They pretty much own home electronic retail in Britain. Think of it as Best Buy + Circuit City.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  28. But how reliable are HD based recorders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I mean what happens if the HD crashes? I will probably end up loosing around 120 Gb of movies. CD burning is a pain as well, as those get scratched. So CDs and DVDs are not really the panacea if you want to store your movies. In some ways VHS and Betamax are still better.

  29. please explain to me by geekoid · · Score: 1

    how tivo does me one whit of good? since I don't have cable or satalite?
    we only watch monies and childrens shows in my house.
    How do I get a movie from my library and play it on a TiVo?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Re:The UKs largest retailer by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1
    You mean Harrod's right? Harrod's is a piss ant compared to even some of the mid-sized box stores here in the states.

    No you stupid halfwit - not like Harrods at all. Harrods is one store. Dixons group is the biggest electrical retail chain in the UK.

    Why the hell doesn't the US Govt make it compulsory to have a certain IQ before posting?

    --
    Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
  31. Re:The UKs largest retailer by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1
    You mean Harrod's right? Harrod's is a piss ant compared to even some of the mid-sized box stores here in the states.
    Harrod's is not by any stretch of the imagination the UK's largest retailer. Nor is Dixons (which the article refers to) - they may be the largest consumer electronics retailer though.

    Harrod's is probably one of the largest shops in the world. I am sure there are warehouse shops all over which are bigger and Macy's may be too, but Harrods is most certainly the finest. It blows even the best department stores New York has to offer right out of the water.

  32. VHS is dead by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fans of the VHS video format have been gathering outside the home of VHS for over an hour, forming an impromptu vigil for this fallen hero of home entertainment which was found dead of Degaussclerosis in its home yesterday.

    One woman, sobbing, pleaded, "But how will I record American Idol now?"

    A memorial service is planned for next week. At the ceremony, the casket containing VHS's earthly remains will be inserted into a slot on the front of a specially constructed burial vault and lowered into the ground.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:VHS is dead by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny

      VHS' headstone is blinking 12:00

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:VHS is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fans of the VHS video format have been gathering outside the home of VHS for over an hour, forming an impromptu vigil for this fallen hero of home entertainment

      And then one particulary bright lad was heard to yell, how can VHS be dead when we still have his poems! Young Ones quote incorrect due to me only having them on VHS - which is dead.

  33. Still using VHS for recording TV shows... by deragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not have a DVD player. I do not rent much movies. I do however record a lot of TV shows. My old VHS does the job well. Alternative recording devices are still way to expensive for my taste to replace my VHS and VHS offers "good enough" quality for my needs (when I record a TV show, it is for its content, not the quality of the images).

    I bet because of the recording needs, VHS will still be with us for a while. Yes, other technologies are comming and gaining market share, but they still have a lot to go (in price) for VHS to disapear from households.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  34. VHS will never be dead.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 0

    ...until the movie "Electric Dreams" is released on DVD.

    1. Re:VHS will never be dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is out on VCD :)

  35. DVD comment was irrelevant by petersam · · Score: 1
    The original post said "So how long until the mass market will be saying goodbye to the DVD player?"

    You can't even start to predict that date until there's actually an agreed upon replacement for the DVD player.
    Is it my PVR hooked up to a cable/satellite provider? No - the disk space problem limits its utility for building a useful library.
    Is it video on demand? Maybe, but the technology has a ways to go in order to support the portability, sharability and scalability of a DVD library.

    ...now I'll wait 5 seconds for those more knowledgeable than I to clear this up. :-)

  36. Its been dead for some time by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    I remember the last VHS VCR I bought in Seattle in 1996, I got the cheapest model for 119.00

    I remember the latest DVD player I bought in San Jose @ Target in 2004, I got the cheapest model for 39.99

    The DVD player I got plays VCD DVD MP3 JPG and some other things I dont use it for...

  37. Still for sale though-Good enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm not certain why you got a funny for telling the truth.

    I have over a 100 VHS tapes going back over a decade. Quite a lot of it irreplaceable.

    I have (some) of the equipment needed to convert (I need a genlock), and the skill, although time is an issue.

    However the majority have none of the above, and VHS is a good example of the "good enough" and "If it aint broke" principles.

    Eventually I'll get a DVD recorder (once all the "whatcha gonna call it" settles down), but then there's the issue of "what's good to record on TV?"

  38. VHS is not dead by Eudial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the deal. I've got this GPU with TV-in, but it doesen't have a TV-tuner. So, what do i do? I hook up my VCR to my puter so i can watch TV on my puter without a TV tuner card. It's cheap and works in Linux.

    A run of the mill DVD player doesen't have TV tuning capability, therefore it sucks and is nothing that will replace my VHS and DVD drive on my puter anytime soon.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:VHS is not dead by Eudial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's the deal. I've got this GPU with TV-in, but it doesen't have a TV-tuner. So, what do i do? I hook up my VCR to my puter so i can watch TV on my puter without a TV tuner card. It's cheap and works in Linux.

      A run of the mill DVD player doesen't have TV tuning capability, therefore it sucks and is nothing that will replace my VHS and DVD drive on my puter anytime soon.


      Eh, that was a mess. That'll teach me not to post drunk.

      What i meant is, why discard your VCR when you can tune TV with it? And when you /do/ want to watch DVD 99% of the computers around have DVD players. With a descent screen it makes a TV completely redudnant!

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:VHS is not dead by evilmuffins · · Score: 1

      Whoa, awesome, how'd you manage sober up in 3 minutes?

    3. Re:VHS is not dead by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It's cheaper to buy a PCI tv-tuner card, than it would be to buy a VCR to plug-in to your video card.

      Plus, satellite/digital cable tuners are replacing the need for a TV tuner, and even for OTA, HDTV is getting phased-in.

      Sure, keep your VCR, but I don't think you'll want to buy another one when your current VCR fails.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:VHS is not dead by jlleblanc · · Score: 1

      Because, if over-the-air digital television is launched successfully and analog goes dark, you will need to buy a new tuner anyway.

      -Joe

    5. Re:VHS is not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only assume you are in that uncivilised country called the US of A, digital television has been around and successful for a long time. Sky stopped their analog broadcasts quite some time ago now.

    6. Re:VHS is not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PCI TV Tuner cards are in the £35-45 range.
      Cheap VHS are in the £25-40 range.
      Cheap digital tuners are in the £30-50 range.

    7. Re:VHS is not dead by hattig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but analogue TV signals will be dead soon, and the main channels in any country aren't that good anyway.

      OTOH a Freeview digital terrestrial receiver in the UK costs under £50 new, which would make a smaller and neater 'TV Tuner' for a video card with a Video In jack. And 30 free channels is better than 5. Even if they still all suck :)

      I've only watched a couple of hours of TV in the past week though, apart from the news channels. I have no need for a VCR, DVD Recorder or TiVo. So my opinion probably isn't worth much compared to someone who has a need to catch up on the daily made-up lives in soap operas.

  39. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by UWC · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I suppose this isn't exactly on topic (read: complete tangent), but you mention a "car boot sale," which I assume means someone selling used junk from the trunk (US vernacular) of their car. Are such boot sales common? I don't recall ever seeing one in Tennessee, though yard sales/garage (carhole) sales are common around here. Is it a UK peculiarity, or maybe just more common in areas more densely populated than TN suburbs?

  40. Then what are people using to record? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As popular as Tivo and its ilk are, I really doubt it has risen to majority use for video recording.

    I'm a little surprised no-one would be buying a VCR, as they are still handy to record things...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Then what are people using to record? by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

      From the looks of things on the internet, there are other people already recording everything and taking out the commercials and sharing them as .avi's.

      One of the only things I don't see too much of already in .avi's are sporting events, but I guess that's what ESPN/SportsCenter is for.

      For some, I'm sure d/l'ing a 350MB file for the show they missed is just about as good, if not better, than having their own device to do the job.

    2. Re:Then what are people using to record? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Stand-alone DVD-Recorders, some even with hard drives, are becomming rather cheap.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Then what are people using to record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      £30 cheap? As thats the price of a VHS.

  41. hmm by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    I have actually never owned a vhs system. I dont know anyone who does. Even all of my non techie freinds exclusively use DVDs now.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I have actually never owned a vhs system. I dont know anyone who does. Even all of my non techie freinds exclusively use DVDs now.

      You must be 16.

  42. Re:The UKs largest retailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You mean Harrod's right?

    No, only tourists shop at Harrods. Dixons is the store.

  43. DVD next? by ylikone · · Score: 1

    No, I don't think so. CD's are still popular! I mean, how much music can I buy on DVD or anything other than CD?

    --
    Meh.
  44. What I'd like to see... by temojen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine The data capacity and economics (as far as tape costs go) that would be possible with a VHS data backup drive. Right now it's cheaper to buy a new computer and build a RAID-server than to buy a tape drive & rotation tapes for a small-medium business. $1/Tape is a lot better than the $1/GB you pay for tapes now. If the digital tape format & (USB/FireWire?) interface were standardized, there could be some major competition for the drives (instead of the $1200 drives now on the market).

    People might actually start making regular backups again.

    1. Re:What I'd like to see... by mseidl · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If the digital tape format & (USB/FireWire?) interface were standardized...

      What is the deal with tapes? Digital tape this, digital tape that... Now VHS that can record HDTV.
      VHS and tape styled anything should be phased out now. I do not know why people/companies insist on fixing old 'tape' technology.
      Cd's/DVD's or any small round plastic media is far cheaper to produce and buy then tape. And with Blu-Ray/HD-DVD around the corner... Storage capacity will increase greatly. Especially with Blu-Ray at 50gb per DL disc. Just my .o2 Euros...
    2. Re:What I'd like to see... by grm_wnr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about VHS, but try MiniDV:

      Commercial: http://www.firestreamer.com/fs/
      GPL (CL only): http://dvbackup.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:What I'd like to see... by havaloc · · Score: 2, Informative

      They actually have devices which can make 4GB backups on VHS, and it was even on Slashdot in 1998. The comments are gone, but I seem to remember that it didn't work very well.

    4. Re:What I'd like to see... by temojen · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about encoding digital signals as analog video then recording it. I'm talking about densely recording digital data on VHS tapes.

    5. Re:What I'd like to see... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It has been tried. Both with stock VHS decks, and with fully digital tapes drives that used VHS tapes.

      It's not very cheap, reliable, or high enough capacity to be useful.

      A second hard drive is the way to go.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:What I'd like to see... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      "I'm not talking about encoding digital signals as analog video then recording it. I'm talking about densely recording digital data on VHS tapes."

      In that case, you'd end up with an expensive tape backup drive. 4mm DAT and 8mm Hi8 for audio and video recording use the same size tapes and similar mechanisms as the 4mm DDS and 8mm AIT drives used for data backup.

    7. Re:What I'd like to see... by temojen · · Score: 1

      It might be a more expensive drive at first, but VHS tapes are far cheaper & larger than DAT and Hi8. If they can be made with the same data density (b/cm2) and many manufacturers are churning out the drives, they'll get cheap fast, as well as being high-capacity.

    8. Re:What I'd like to see... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      Similar to this is Alesis Digital Audio Tape (ADAT), which used Super VHS (SVHS) tapes. The technology has been obsoleted, due to superior cost/performance of digital audio recording to hard disk. Production ended about 4 years ago.

      The mechanical vulnerability of cheap tape systems is just too much of a disadvantage compared to other modern options.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:What I'd like to see... by MmmDee · · Score: 1

      One of the the nice things about using the VHS tapes back in mid-1980s or so, was their ~5GB capacity and easy storage. The company I worked for had a large fireproof vault (~4ft x 3ft x 8ft) inside a huge Faraday cage (40ft x 40ft) into which the company's backups were kept. That would have been impossible to do with disk drives then, but only mildly inconvenient now with hot-swappable drives. I read somewhere that a well-kept disk drive should last about 20 years on the shelf.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    10. Re:What I'd like to see... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Imagine The data capacity and economics (as far as tape costs go) that would be possible with a VHS data backup drive.

      I don't have to imagine. At the office where I used to work (20 years ago now), we had an Alpha Micro 1000 that did a nightly backup onto a VHS video recorder. The actual backup was done automatically overnight using something similar to a cron job, and the VCR had to be programmed to do a timed recording at a certain time of the night to capture the data as the computer "played it".

      The VCR video-in just plugged right in to the video-out plug on the AM1000 so hooking it up was simple. To restore your data from backup, just hook up to the video-out on the VCR, load the restore program on the AM1000, and press play.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  45. Darned newfangled VCRs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I still use an 8mm projector with a gramophone for the sound.

  46. How to archive VHS tapes? by lawpoop · · Score: 1
    My buddy has a large collection of VHS tapes, and he wants to get them on DVD to preserve them and make the content more accessible. I tried to convince him to go for a file server box with a large hard drive, possibly a RAID array.

    How do slashdotters recommend the preservation of tapes?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  47. Re:VHS is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...long live VHS!

  48. VHS tape is not dead for me! by antdude · · Score: 1

    I still use it to record TV shows. I don't have a PVR/DVR due to the high cost. I will retire using VHS tapes is when my VCR breaks to get a PVR/DVR. The VCR is only like 3-4 years old so it has a while.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  49. so tell me.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    How many programs have you recorded on your 40 dollar dvd player?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:so tell me.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      the same amount I recorded on my VCR.

      ZERO.

      Just because I could - doesnt mean I did...

      I watch about 2 hours of TV per week... I have TIVO and still rarely find the will power to sit in front of the TV when I could be doing so many other things.

  50. Not for me-Laser LPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Not as long as I have my original, unLucasfuckedup Star Wars tapes."

    Laserdiscs.

  51. Drama queen by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    There are other examples of how the Chinese have altered the landscape of history.

    Somehow I don't think this will be as significant to future historians as the Great Wall or the Cultural Revolution.

  52. No need by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    They'll still be for sale, the high end ones that is. I can stil buy Betamax/Betacam semi-pro and pro units. It'll be a long time before high end ones go away.

    If you do want to get one to last though, do get a semi-pro unit. The consumer units are all pretty cheaply made. Spend $300-$500 and you can get one that'll last for 10-20 years, even with quite a bit of use. It'll also produce a much better picture.

    Personally, I'd say it's cheaper and better to just convert the movies to another, digital, format. Good thing about digital is it's easy to keep around. When you get a new digital storage medium (new discs, bigger HD, whatever) you just copy the data to it and you're fine. I still have data orignallf rom 5.25" floppies. I don't have a 5.25" drive, and haven't for years, it's just gone through intermediate phases to it's current storage.

    Also VHS tapes have physical contact with the heads so each viewing wears them down more and more. Best to get them digital as soon as possible and then not worry about it.

  53. What I want... by Rufus88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I want a TiVo/Replay-type device that has no subscription service associated with it. I want to program it the way I program my VCR. No fancy schmancy "Record all occurrences of Seinfeld, and phone home to find out when they occur". Just a simple "Record Wednesdays on Channel 4 at 9:00PM for 1 hour", like a normal VHS VCR. I want recording quality, storage capacity, the ability to pause live TV, and the ability to watch something I recorded earlier while the system is recording something else. And I don't want to build a dedicated PC to do the job. If I can get that, I may even forego the ability to pop out the tape I recorded in the living room VCR and bring it up to the bedroom VCR to watch the rest of the show in bed. Maybe. I'll think about it. Can I get that anywhere? If not, I'm sticking with my VCR.

    1. Re:What I want... by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      toshiba branded tivo model sdh400 (if you can find one anywhere)

      I've had it for just over a year, never paid the subscription or monthly fee.. tivo blames it for a lot of loss of revenue.. it gives 3 days worth of guide data, and does NOT do recording of 'season passes'

      but it does do what you want.. and it's saved my tv habits like you can't believe (best thing in the world to buy a new parent)

      they are no longer made I believe, to purchase new, you'll have to buy some NOS (new old stock) from an online merchant.. very mch worth it to me.

      40 hrs basic recording, 80 hrs at low quality, plus it has a dvd player in it... find one, love it.. I do..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:What I want... by icarusone · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can run a ReplayTV without a monthly service if "Record Wednesdays on Channel 4 at 9:00PM for 1 hour" service is all you want. The 12.95 per month is to use the guide service.

    3. Re:What I want... by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      Try a hard-disk based DVD recorder. I have the Toshiba RD-XS32. I can watch DVDs (duh), record a show from the tuner or inputs onto either a DVD or the hard disk, edit the video, schedule the recording like a VCR, etc..

      I can also watch live TV delayed (time-slip), which is great. I got hooked on this feature very quickly.

      I've used this to transfer home videos and edit them together and then burn DVDs. Suitable for very minor editing only, unless you have a lot of patience!

      -- Andyvan

    4. Re:What I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I want a TiVo/Replay-type device that has no subscription service associated with it...

      You mean like this?

      http://www.humaxdigital.com/uk/products/pvr-8000 t. asp

    5. Re:What I want... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      My recommendation is buy a $100 Tivo. All Tivos come with "basic service" which gives something like three days of programming information. You don't even want that ... you wouldn't even have to hook it up (to the phone line). My understanding is that any Tivo can accept a request of the form you describe: "Record Channel X beginning at time Y and ending at time Z." Ours certainly did before it finished downloading programming information for the first time (of course ours was the fancy $700 version that would record DVDs).

      I think you can get exactly what you want now, for $100. I'm considering getting exactly that for our bedroom TV, in addition to the Tivo we already have in the living room.

    6. Re:What I want... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. This is how I record ER (yeah, yeah, I know, fuck off) since NBC erroneously lists the start time as 9:59, and I ain't cuttin' into CSI.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  54. How can you skip intro scenes by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there is a gnu/linux player that can do this. Where can I find one. Tell me more about how it is done. How does the DVD industry make it dificult to subvert the forced intros.

    --
    "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
  55. hmmmm by ylikone · · Score: 1
    "when I record a TV show, it is for its content"

    Hmm, this is why I quit watching TV altogether, never could find any good content.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:hmmmm by eaolson · · Score: 1
      Hmm, this is why I quit watching TV altogether, never could find any good content.

      So we can assume you never saw Firefly?

    2. Re:hmmmm by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Hmm, this is why I quit watching TV altogether, never could find any good content."

      You are NOT alone, and THAT is the bigger picture behind the story about the death of VHS.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  56. Not to mention the broadcast flag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as I can get an analog signal, I can tape and watch later. I do that a lot. I tape movies in the middle of the night and watch them as I ride my exercise bike. With a broadcast flag, I doubt that I can do that any more.

    My All-in-Wonder card will digitize the vhs tapes and hard drives are getting cheaper, so I might not lose my collection when vhs is discontinued. I, for one, will miss it.

    1. Re:Not to mention the broadcast flag. by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      PPV movies (being the one specifically they tended to do) can be broadcast with macrovision stopping recoding on tape.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
  57. VHS is Dead... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Long Live DVD Burners.

    If the entertainment industry has its way - we might well end up in a strange topsy-turvy world where recordings of the past simply disappear from the mainstream, memories become short, and we go back to painting on the walls of our collective dens.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:VHS is Dead... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "recordings of the past simply disappear from the mainstream, memories become short, and we go back to painting on the walls of our collective dens."

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:VHS is Dead... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      "He who forgets the past is doomed to repeat it" - Attributed to Che Guevara (but I think someone else said this before he did).

      To put it another way, throwing out the baby with the bath water is a 'bad thing'.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  58. The article is total BS by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read that article yesterday. It basically says the DVD player has replaced the VCR. They aren't directly comparable products. The VCR's main selling point is it allows you to record TV content to watch at another time. The DVD's main selling point is it allows you to watch pre-recorded content.

    The VCR originally beat the laserdisc (and destroyed RCA in the process) because people wanted the ability to record. PVRs or set-top DVD-Rs might be the eventual downfall of the VCR but the current DVD players sure aren't.

    The article even has a summary of the VCR that talks about how people loved the ability to record. Apparently, the author's microscopic mind couldn't make the connection that DVD players don't have that ability yet.

    The CD player also didn't replace the cassette deck. They lived as complimentry products for many years until mass CD-Rs and mp3 players took over the cassette's market. Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:The article is total BS by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > They aren't directly comparable products.

      You are missing the bigger picture.

      This represents not only the death of the VHS recorder, but of broadcast television itself!

      People *used to* record TV. Now they watch canned content.

      The VHS-HiFi replaced the 1/4" reel to reel for me, and until DAT came along it was the only option for high bandwidth audio. (I'm a musician, could care less about recording TV programs).
      But all that is a long gone era, in this day of cheap 24-bit multitrack digital.

      >Apparently, the author's microscopic mind
      >couldn't make the connection that DVD players
      >don't have that ability yet.

      There are cheap-ish DVD+/-RW recorders, and also cameras. Where have you been?

      >The CD player also didn't replace the cassette
      >deck.

      The CD-R sure as hell did! Ok, so there are a couple of chumps who will still buy a Nakamichi Dragon for $1800. It took a disgustingly long time for CD-R to reach the market, but that's another matter.

      I don't guess you remember how long it took them (Ampex) to give us *Cassette* in the first place, do you?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:The article is total BS by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      I read that article yesterday. It basically says the DVD player has replaced the VCR. They aren't directly comparable products. The VCR's main selling point is it allows you to record TV content to watch at another time. The DVD's main selling point is it allows you to watch pre-recorded content.

      Two words: DVD recorder. Hell, they're not even expensive - cheaper than a decent VCR was a couple of years ago.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:The article is total BS by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      You expect logical comparisons.

      What are you? naive or still optimistic?

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    4. Re:The article is total BS by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "People *used to* record TV. Now they watch canned content."

      Speak for yourself pal. I use my video almost every night to do exactly that as I usually get home late and miss most of the good stuff on TV.

    5. Re:The article is total BS by Snaller · · Score: 1

      The VCR originally beat the laserdisc (and destroyed RCA in the process) because people wanted the ability to record.

      And now the go on the internet and download it instead.

      The article even has a summary of the VCR that talks about how people loved the ability to record. Apparently, the author's microscopic mind couldn't make the connection that DVD players don't have that ability yet.

      Wow, you sure live in a rural area!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  59. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by flossie · · Score: 1
    I don't recall ever seeing one in Tennessee, though yard sales/garage (carhole) sales are common around here. Is it a UK peculiarity, or maybe just more common in areas more densely populated than TN suburbs?

    Most towns in the UK advertise weekly car boot sales. I have never actually seen one, however, because they are always on a Sunday morning. Whatever that is.

  60. Get a DVD player. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The cheapest ones cost around $50 or even less....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  61. My family still... by genrader · · Score: 1

    We still use VHS tapes about as much as DVDs, still buy both of them. I prefer DVDs myself for extra features and stuff, but 70% of the time on high qualtiy VHS's you don't notice a huge lack of quality when compared to a DVD

  62. VHS going going gone, and now a /. article by jfarnold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When my wife and I moved to Wash. DC Our moving company stole our VCR. Insured at $350 bought 12 years ago, the company paid to replace it at retail. We still had the receipt (yes we're that crazy.) We bought what we call the uber-VCR 5 years ago. Look at http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity /eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_BrowseCatalog-Start?Categor yName=hav_VHSVCR&Dept=havsony now and all they offer is combo DVD players and none over $170. Clearly money is no longer being made by VHS recorders, and the last gasp already occurred. Now if you want a record player you might as well make your own since the cost is just crazy now after an insane dip as producers changed over to CD players. I also worked for Hollywood Video, and unless their store is by a trailer park, they're not renting VHS tapes anymore.

  63. How to archive VHS tapes?-Sony Camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BEST way is to get yourself a firewire card, plus one of those (older) sony camcorders (the digital tape models) with composite in, (internal genlock) and firewire out. Then get a copy of premiere.

    Second best is a "bridge" (pinnacle or hollywood) that accepts the analog input. The software is either specific to the hardware (pinnacle) or general (premiere). Edit as needed.

    The last is a video capture card feed the composite signal in. Pay, share, and free software solutions can be used (virtualDUB).

    Regardless of which way you go, make certain your computer is up to the task.

    1. Re:How to archive VHS tapes?-Sony Camcorder by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I think converting to dv-firewire is going to be bad if you want to filter the source, and usually that's needed with noisy VHS.
      So the best thing is an internal capture card. The faster the PC, the better, because you get less frame drops.

    2. Re:How to archive VHS tapes?-Sony Camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think converting to dv-firewire is going to be bad if you want to filter the source, and usually that's needed with noisy VHS."

      That's why I mentioned the internal genlocking. Some of the Sony digital camcorders have it. You could also purchase a stand-alone genlocking unit, but at least with the camcorder you get that and a whole bunch of other stuff for about the same price.

  64. Linux and MythTV by ylikone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    is what you might be looking for.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Linux and MythTV by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      > is what you might be looking for.

      When it comes preconfigured in a 1u rack form factor for $300, it will be. It doesn't actually have to be rack size, I'll settle for a consumer a/v device form factor. No fan please.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  65. Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This announcement by Dixons smacks of not telling the whole story.

    I don't know how popular PVRs are in the US market (in absolute terms; yes, I know TiVo has a cult following, but what are *most* people using?), but they have *not* yet taken off that much in Britain.

    TiVo was introduced to the UK, then subsequently withdrawn (*1). Although Murdoch's Sky have since launched "Sky Plus", that only works with Sky satellite TV.

    Basically, I am convinced that PVRs will be phenomenally successful (even more so than DVD players) in the UK *once* you can get a decent 80Gb model for less than UKP 100, and the Freeview (Digital Terrestial TV) electronic program guide provides a full 7-day service.

    However.... this hasn't happened yet! I was considering getting a basic PVR for UKP 150.00 in February, but it was very limited, so I got a 50 quid VCR with 12-hour recording capacity instead (as a stopgap). My guess back then, and one I still hold, is that Christmas 2005 will see massive PVR sales in the UK, and the swift death of VHS.

    Until then, what are people buying?

    I can now buy a DVD recorder for 200 pounds, but I don't see this as a replacement for the VCR. Put simply, most VCRs were used either for watching pre-recorded films (DVD players now have this market) or time-shifting. Sure, a DVD recorder looks like a direct replacement for the VCR, but the PVR is actually a better choice for what they are actually *doing*- time shifting!

    Anyway, this is beside the point. VCR sales may be falling, but I don't see recordable DVD, nor PVR sales filling the gap just yet.

    Maybe I'm wrong, but it's notable that it's only the Dixons stores (which tend to be smaller and based in the city-centre) are discontinuing them, and the sibling Currys stores (larger, based mainly in retail parks) are not.

    In short, I think the Dixons group are trying to improve the profit margins in their smaller stores. They just finished closing down a large number of them (good riddance).

    (*1) Possibly due to bad publicity they got when they automatically uploaded a BBC program without prior notification, or maybe just bad marketing in the first place. They pushed the 'pause live video' selling-point over everything else, and.... maybe that wasn't enough to convince people to shell out.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Possibly due to bad publicity they got when they automatically uploaded a BBC program without prior notification, or maybe just bad marketing in the first place.

      The BBC thing was a publicity success. Most people haven't a clue about whay a Tivo is. After that they got mentioned in all the newspapers.

      They pushed the 'pause live video' selling-point over everything else, and.... maybe that wasn't enough to convince people to shell out.

      Possibly. This just isn't a 'sexy' enough a feature for most people. But apart from that, it's very hard to get across how it differs from a VCR.

    2. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      I was considering getting a basic PVR for UKP 150.00 in February, but it was very limited

      Have a look at MythTV - with the advantage that it's opensource so if theres a feature missing you can implement it yourself.

      I went for Myth because it's open source and at the time Sky Plus had some long standing (and serious bugs) with the "series link" feature which lets you record a whole series whcih showed no sign of getting fixed. I still think the way Myth decides what to record is superior - I can tell it to "Record all episodes of Battlestar Galactica on any channel" and it will. If there are 2 programs it wants to record at the same time it will look around to see if any of them are repeated later (even on another channel) and reschedule to avoid the conflict. At the end of the season I won't delete the instruction to record Battlestar Galactica so when the next season starts it will automagically start recording it for me so I don't have to keep an eye out for the new season starting.

    3. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by KombuchaGuy · · Score: 1

      So if they could pronounce the VHS dead now and sell us all DVD Recorders and then in 12 months time start to sell us PVRs then that would be pretty good for them. That's what they're doing. That and getting publicity.

      --
      sig free since 1993
    4. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by BridgeGarth · · Score: 1

      Just one point. Freeview does have 7-day EPG now. My Panasonic digital TV sees the full 7-days and I can schedule recordings from the EPG to my VCR! Older boxes may not have the ability to see the new EPG. I do have an ancient OnDigital box which can not see the EPG.

    5. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Just one point. Freeview does have 7-day EPG now. Older boxes may not have the ability to see the new EPG. I do have an ancient OnDigital box which can not see the EPG.

      I'd heard about that, but assumed it hadn't been completely rolled out, because my Daewoo Setpal box (bought in February this year) hasn't picked up any updates.

      Now, this could be because I live in a poor reception area, *and* the rooftop aeriel is fscked; hence, I can only pick up BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, CBBC and News-24 with the digibox. But aren't the software updates meant to be available through BBC1 or 2 anyway?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      But apart from that, it's very hard to get across how it differs from a VCR.

      Maybe the mistake was in comparing it to a VCR. Sell the "I can do what I like with TV, watch anything I want, when I want, and have recommendations" angle, shift the emphasis away from superficial comparisons.

      The VCR for the most part was being used as a slightly limited way of doing something (i.e. time-shifting). Perhaps TiVo should have shown how it lets people control their TV watching and concentrated on a functionality angle. Comparing with a VCR is hard, because many of TiVo's functions are far cruder, if not nonexistent, in a VCR.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Good suggestion, but I don't have Sky and have no intention of getting it. My TV reception is pretty poor where I live, but even when I was getting great reception with my Freeview box, there were still times there was *nothing* worth watching on, IMHO.

      Basically, I'm fed up of casual TV browsing. I can't recall the last TV program I'd actually make a point of watching regularly. Yeah, I watch it, but not that much.

      I wouldn't consider going for a PC-based solution unless it was in a small, attractive (*), and more importantly, *very* power-efficient and noise-free box. Plus, I'd need a Freeview card, so already it's getting quite expensive, and that's ignoring the time taken to set up MythTV (maybe it's easy; I haven't checked it out).

      It might be cool for doing it for the sake of it, but I don't really have the time, money or inclination at present.

      (*) Damn... when the hell is the Nanode finally going to come out.... it's already delayed.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Basically, I'm fed up of casual TV browsing

      That's the whole point though - I don't just watch "what's on" anymore. When I want to watch TV there's always something I'm actually vaguely interested in already recorded so I end up watching that instead of any old rubbish (ok, so much of it was on when I wouldn't normally be watching TV anyway). A far more productive use of my TV watching time than repeats of the simpsons. :)

      I wouldn't consider going for a PC-based solution unless it was in a small, attractive

      The Asus Pundit boxes are quite shiny.

      *very* power-efficient

      Myth supports ACPI soft powering off between recordings, and if you're using Freeview then you can use a really low-spec CPU since you're not having to do any encoding (it just grabs the MPEG2 stream straight off the air).

      Plus, I'd need a Freeview card, so already it's getting quite expensive

      Freeview cards are reasonably cheap. I'd say that you could build a reasonable Freeview Myth box for less than the price of a Sky Plus box (ok, it's not cheap, but it's in the same league as commercial systems)

      and that's ignoring the time taken to set up MythTV

      I thought most slashdotters enjoyed fiddling with computers? :)

    9. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      (*1) Possibly due to bad publicity they got when they automatically uploaded a BBC program without prior notification, or maybe just bad marketing in the first place. They pushed the 'pause live video' selling-point over everything else, and.... maybe that wasn't enough to convince people to shell out.

      I may be a bit paranoid, but I think the marketing was deliberatly bad.

      Sky knew they were going to be launching Sky+ about a year after TiVo. By making one of the least important features the main selling point would mean that the differences between the less functional Sky+ and the TiVo would be less obvious.

      I also think Sky have something against PVRs in general (even thier own Sky+). PVRs threaten the revenue model of the non Movie/Sports channels which is why they're marketing Sky+ as something that can pause+rewind live tv and let you record a sports match while watching a film. The watching programmes when you want with the ability to skip over commercials is not mentioned.

      I'm glad I got my TiVo while I still could. A couple of my friends had them so I knew what they were capable of and I really wanted one. I had to put off getting one untill I could afford it which was when I gave up smoking (some of the money I saved from not smoking went towards the TiVo - a little incentive that helped me quit). This was just as the TiVo's were disappearing so I ended up haveing to go to a Comet an hour's drive away to find one (IIRC it was the 7th electrical store I tried and I was just about to give up hope of finding one).

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    10. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Sky knew they were going to be launching Sky+ about a year after TiVo. By making one of the least important features the main selling point would mean that the differences between the less functional Sky+ and the TiVo would be less obvious.

      Sky marketed/sold TiVo in the UK?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of TiVo/PVRs?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The Asus Pundit boxes are quite shiny.

      Had a look.... mmm... it's *not bad*, but it doesn't quite have the appeal of the Hoojum boxes for me. Arguably that finish would match most modern audio-visual equipment better than the Nanode or Cubit, but.... dammit, I want the Nanode. And I hope they sell it in lots of different colours. Red, or coppery-bronze. Yummy (^_^)

      They should sell more audiovisual stuff with a copper finish... *everyone* does silver now. Although silver can still look decently expensive if they put the effort in.

      Myth supports ACPI soft powering off between recordings, and if you're using Freeview then you can use a really low-spec CPU since you're not having to do any encoding (it just grabs the MPEG2 stream straight off the air).

      Yeah, I was taking all that into account.

      I thought most slashdotters enjoyed fiddling with computers? :)

      Sometimes. Sometimes they can be a PITA, and if you're missing your favourite TV program because of a ropey home-brew box, you could end up kicking the thing across the room.

      Thing is, even when I was watching more TV, I often did something else while I was doing it, and didn't watch a particular program (i.e. I turned on when I felt like it and turned off when I felt like it). And if I'm watching something prerecorded, I feel like I have to give it my attention. This is one problem I have with TV.

      Radio on the other hand, I can listen to it in the shower, I can listen to it when I'm doing the dishes...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  66. I for one welcome our new DVD Overlords! by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously. They're way better than the VHS ones...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  67. Dixons/ Pc world by briohewi · · Score: 1

    These shops are more about selling - the more expensive the better - why sell someone a £40 VHS video recorder when a £300 DVD recorder will do the job just as well - I recently wanted a CRT moniter - shopping at PC world - only 2 poor quality CRTs on sale - hundreds of lcds- for 3 times the price.

  68. Mandatory Nietzsche by LPetrazickis · · Score: 5, Funny

    "VHS is dead." - Ronnie Coote

    "Ronnie Coote is dead." - VHS

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  69. VHS/DVD Combos by kupopo · · Score: 1

    What about those, are those still going to be around for purchase? They're quite handy, considering I don't plan on buying DVDs to replace all the VHS tapes I own.

  70. This was one step in the media cartel's plan by dmeranda · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember when the media folks were arguing before congress in favor of laws to allow them to restrict fair use with digital media; BECAUSE, as they said, there were analog equivalents which people could use that still preserved their fair use rights.

    Only, if the anolog equipment dies (no new equipment, spare parts, video tape, etc); then where will our fair rights be? Everything will be locked up so tight in DRM by then that there will be no rights at all. And I'm sure the media people making those arguments knew full well that all they had to do was wait a little longer and then they could seize complete control.

    No new fair rights are being built into new technologies. The only thing that's happing is that rights are being revoked, slowly, one new technology at a time. And it's being done so cleverly that nobody notices.

    This same trick is being used by a lot of industries. Say, you don't want your automobile to monitor where you go and how fast your drive? Then just buy an older model car. But in 10 years; oops, I guess you have little choice. To bad, the laws were already passed because we argued then that you had an option.

  71. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    They are everywhere throughout the UK, having been going for years and are, I believe, quite popular! The people who go, tend to be fairly religous about going, so it'll be an every Sunday event.

    Don't know if they're perculiar to the UK.... but it does sound like the type of thing that *only* people in the UK would do!

  72. Strange by phorm · · Score: 1

    The ads are an exemption (since you can fast-forward), but I've always found the annoyance of tape is in the delay. Insert tape... "damn it's at the end" ... rewind tape... rewinding ... still rewinding ... stiiiillll rewinding ......

    1. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, at least you can rewind your tape. I still haven't figured out how to do that with a DVD. The rewind fees are KILLING ME!

  73. J Edgar who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What difference does it make whether a nation of cross-dressers,

    J Edgar Hoover...

    transvestites

    J Edgar Hoover!

    and homosexuals

    J. Edgar. Hoover.

    uses VHS tapes to record tv? This is an American site, for Americans.

    Like J Edgar Hoover.

  74. Your kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt VHS would be phased out in Australia anytime soon, if only it were replaced with VCD.

  75. Long live to... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Beta Cam!

  76. Notice the timing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a big incentive for Dixons to make this announcement in the last month before Christmas. There's a strong likelihood that this will significantly increase sales of DVD Recorders and DVR boxes in their stores. They got loads of free advertising in the press, and anyone who was dithering about hanging on with VHS is likely to be influenced, if not by the Dixons announcement, but by the rash of independent 'VHS is dead' stories that it prompts.

    VHS decks probably don't make much margin for the retailer any more. Thanks to all the mechanics inside, they can't go lower in price. And after all, would there be a thrill in getting a VCR for Christmas?

    BTW, there's no downside for Dixons, they'll still sell VCRs 'whilst stocks last'. Be sure they won't run out whilst they're still selling. Also, their sister retail chains will still stock them.

  77. Why is this news? by Alleyoopsoyale · · Score: 0

    Why is this the second story? this was on google news yesterday. Old news people.

  78. Re:Something Not So Funny by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not asian, but I'd have to agree (however, I would broaden the scope to east asia in general not just China). And actually one could say it's as large an effect as the Great Wall or anything else that is memorable for decades to come. Maybe not this single act but a pattern of constantly driving culture through business. Hate it or love it, East Asia has definitely had a major hand in getting appliances and computers in the hands of every working class person in the world. Without the way they mass produce products the concept of old Billy Gates and Jobs of a PC in every home would never have come to fruition.

  79. You give them the originals?!? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The fast rule in our house is that kids get to play with the backups, and the adults keep the originals stored away safely. This applies to video games, CDs, and DVDs. It's annoying when my kid scratches a Veggie Tales copy, but I'd be pretty peaved if he destroyed a Disney ("We're So Special We Only Release Every Seven Years!") movie.

    Seriously, make backups of everything. Blank media is dirt cheap these days, and in our household at least $cost_of_movie * %likelihood_of_destruction is far greater than $cost_of_dvd-r.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:You give them the originals?!? by nizo · · Score: 1

      Do you have recommendations for software to do this? I feel safe with the video games (I usually put the CD in myself) but I do worry about DVDs (for some reason, my daughter wants to be the one to put those in, and it is easy to scratch them).

  80. ... was tried. by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 3, Informative

    VHS tape drives for backup was tried, back in 8088-based PC days. They used to advertise them in Byte magazine. They were a little touchy, tho, so they never gained trust, so never gained momentum.

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
    1. Re:... was tried. by MmmDee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, a "standard" cassette recorder was quite often used in the early TRS80 / Apple / SwTPC / Altair days for software distribution and data recording. The larger businesses using minicomputers (VAX and such) used 9-track magnetic tape drives and 2400 foot tapes at 800 or 1600bpi, then 6250 bpi (the latter, in GCR format, was very forgiving of errors as it had built in redundancy). However, with several hundred megabytes (circa 1970's-1980's) to save, this required several tape changes and an "operator" for system backups. Better equipped shops had VHS data records (though they never really caught on so far as I know). As I recall, they stored about 5GB per standard VHS tape. Heaven forbid if an error occurred on the tape as they weren't very forgiving owing to the whole concept of where to place the TOC.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    2. Re:... was tried. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes it was and it was at best a little on the flakey side. If you really want to try something like that now I would suggest a digital camcorder that handles firewire. The question is can you send the frames uncompressed? If so it might work but for less money I bet you could get a USB enclosure and a big harddrive or set up an NSUL2 for a network as a backup system

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  81. DVD Player? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

    "The UK's largest retailer of electronics is phasing out VHS VCRs. Sales of DVD players have outstripped VCRs by 40-to-1 recently. So how long until the mass market will be saying goodbye to the DVD player?"

    Please tell me that was a typo.

  82. here's an idea... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    I don't have kids. I don't know how astute your toddlers are, either. But I suggest that you don't try to 'fast-forward to where the video ended last.' The toddlers shouldn't know the difference and you get a lot more mileage out of your video entertainment products by having them re-watch the beginnings.

    Perhaps it won't work. Just a thought.

    1. Re:here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds you were never a bright child, you would then have to put up with them whining that they had already seen that bit. kids ain't stupid.

  83. VHS is dead, by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Long live VHS!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  84. BETA is not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BETA is not dead. Take a trip to south america, and you will not find VHS. All the movies will be in BETA format. Plus all tv studios also use it.

  85. DVD Quality by JavaNPerl · · Score: 1

    I've owned 3 VCRs over about a 15 year span and only one died after years of faithful service. I've owned 5 DVD players within about a 5 year span and have had 3 deaths, my first a Panasonic worked fine on older DVDs but either refused to play newer DVDs or the pauses were so long movies were unviewable, so it was retired. Bought a portable DVD player which refused to power up after 3 months of mild use, its replacement refuses to respond to buttons after more than about 2.5 hours of continuous use. A Phillips DVD player that I purchased about 2 years ago just died a week ago, the spindle motor appears to have quit. I've had several friends that have had similar quality issues. So I'm not entirely sure the DVD trend isn't in part due to the fact that the quality of DVD players seems so bad.

  86. well. by man_ls · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather have DVHS than HDD-based recorders.

    I'm thinking of purchasing one for my home theatre setup, actually. I find that price/performance wise, it's more of a "bang for my buck" than an HDD recorder. Even if it uses the tapes.

    1. Re:well. by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      How can tape ever match the random access capabilities of HD based machines? If all you want to do is sit and just watch complete movies from beginning to end, I suppose that's OK, but it sounds so limited.

      For those of you old enough to recall saving your computer files to tape and then transitioning to using a disc, it's that big a deal. I can't imagine going back to rewinding or FF-ing tape to get to the show I want to watch.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  87. DVD and Tivo are dead, what the hell is VHS? by macslut · · Score: 1

    I remember DVD and Tivo, but I'm now mostly using BitTorrent with eyeHome by El Gato. What the hell is VHS?

  88. TIVO's dead in the US, too. by DogDude · · Score: 1

    To be perfectly honest, Tivo has never taken off in the US either. Like any other gadget, it has it's group of hardcore followers, but Tivo's market penetration in the US is tiny. Most people in the US have no clue as to what a Tivo is.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  89. VHS Dead? by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that, as long as you can rent a VHS at Blockbuster for 99 cents while the same movie in DVD format costs 4 bucks, wheter it's a new release or not!

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  90. Why not have DVD floppy disks? by Supurcell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen a lot of people complaining about DVDs getting scratched. So why not make a DVD with a protective case on like a floppy? It would never leave its shell so it would never get scratched.

    1. Re:Why not have DVD floppy disks? by hattig · · Score: 1

      That's what the protective coating on the Bluray discs will do, stop standard scratches.

      And I know that they will use that feature to make people upgrade, rather than also apply it to standard DVDs as well :(

      OTOH I do take care of my DVDs. Sadly other people might not do the same. I'm quite tempted to start making decrypted 'straight to the film' backup DVDs of my films in the near future though.

  91. Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but how watch TV/movies anyway?
    Just waste of time if you ask me, you can make better use of your time by working to get more $$$.

    It's amazing how many people choose to be stupid and poor instead of rich and wise.

  92. Rental? by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Some rental stores are not ordering VHS tapes anymore. New movies are only available on DVD.

  93. VHS by Elpacoloco · · Score: 0

    What few movies I do have are VHS. Fast forward is good enough. Rewinding is not a problem. DVD and VHS look EXACTLY IDENTICAL as far as I'm concerned.

  94. Control by Elpacoloco · · Score: 1

    What I mean by control is this:
    Last time I watched a DVD movie, I was forced to sit through a bunch of obnoxious previews, and the "fast forward" button didn't work until they all ended, and that really truly pissed me off.

    My computer is not a multimedia device.

    I expect it to play when I say play, stop when I say stop, pause when I say pause, and fast forward when I say fast forward. All else is irrelevant.

    Plus, I can count on being able to back up my tapes. Backing up DVD runs afoul of copyright law.

    1. Re:Control by bob65 · · Score: 1
      Plus, I can count on being able to back up my tapes.

      You can also count on not being to back up your tapes. All you ever do is create an approximation of the original tape. If the original is lost, damaged, then it's gone forever.

    2. Re:Control by decipher_saint · · Score: 1
      Some brands of DVD player allow you to "skip" past normally blocked areas. Also not all studios force you to sit through the FBI warning.

      Plus, I can count on being able to back up my tapes. Backing up DVD runs afoul of copyright law.
      If you are a US citizen you are not permitted by law to duplicate the material in part or whole, even for backup purposes this law applies to any copyrighted media irregardless of format.

      Also, for less than $100 you can purchase a DVD-ROM drive and your computer could become a multi-media device.
      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Control by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Also with every copy there is degredation that compounds over time. First generation backups won't look all that different from the master tape, but subsequent generations will look worse and worse (even with signal boosting).

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  95. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's sort of like a swap meet. You can load up your car/pickup full of stuff you want to sell, then go to the place. You pay some amount of money ($20 or so), and then you get a designated spot and you can sell stuff to the other people who come. People who come to buy stuff either pay nothing to get in or they pay only a nominal fee ($3 or so).

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  96. VHS is still convenient by MisterClever · · Score: 1

    Nothing beats the convenience of good ol' analog VHS. For example, a weekly program in my VCR tapes 'The West Wing.' If I'm not home Wednesday night I end up with a copy anyway. If I want to watch it in the bedroom I pop the tape out and watch it there - If I want to watch it with my girlfriend I pop the tape in her machine at her place. When I'm done I just rewind and tape something else over it. No burning, no hassle.

    1. Re:VHS is still convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Nothing beats the convenience of good ol' analog VHS."

      DVD-RW turns out to be far cheaper and far more convenient than VHS ever was. You haven't been on the other side, personally, so you don't realize this.

  97. karma whoring by friendscallmelenny · · Score: 1
    Electric Dreams

    Summary: Love triangle with a recluse, a talking computer, and a girl. Miles Harding is a nerdy recluse who can't seem to avidly communicate with women. A lovely girl moves in next door (Virginia Madsen) and shows interest in her new neighbor, but he's just too weird to relate. He buys a fancy computer and, even after he spills liquid and burns up the electrical circuits on it, it's still in good shape and working. Only thing is, that it's a special artificial computer, with better communicative skills than Miles. And like a science fiction rendition of Cyrano de Bergnac, the computer starts delivering the enticing love lines to Mile's neighbor. So, she thinks she's in love with romantic Miles, but actually he's just supplying the pretty face. The computer's doing all the leg work. But, Miles faces stiff competition from his only friend and guide to women--a damned computer--when the computer starts learning about human emotion and falls in love with the girl, too.

  98. I knwo, I'm out of touch -- by scribblej · · Score: 1

    But what do most handheld video cameras record to these days? Direct-to-DVD?

    1. Re:I knwo, I'm out of touch -- by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      In a word.

      Yes.

  99. I do the same thing...just with a dvd recorder... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    ...one of the cheap phillips ones, only cost £140.00 and writes on DVD RW's. You can erase and reuse those around 1000 times, a few more than most VHS tapes I've ever come accross.

    I record a show, I can pop it out and take it round a friends house to watch (everyone I know has a DVD player). And when I'm done, I simply select "erase disc" from the menu and program something else in to record.

    --
    I am NaN
  100. Electronics Stores + VHS by ilyanep · · Score: 0

    At Best Buy, I can only ever find 2 purely VHS players, and maybe a few more that are VHS/DVD Player combos. Personally, I think it's a good move, because we should be phasing in DVD recorders (better quality, long lasting, no tape, etc.). The problem is that my grandma (and people in her generation) only know VHS (and she has stacks of VHS tapes, believe me), so when one breaks and we have to replace it, it's really a heartache.

    --
    ~Ilyanep
    To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
  101. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bach is dead!

  102. uhm.. by thanew · · Score: 1

    to me the vhs was dead years ago.. i thought this was almost completely obvious. only if my university would figure it out though, it sucks trying to find someone with a vcr to play a tape a professor wants you to see...

  103. Good things about VHS by bartash · · Score: 1

    There's a great article in the Guardian about how everyone used to watch the same TV shows at the same time.

    --
    Read Epic the first RPG novel.
  104. Easy Solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Buy a new DVD player. ;)

    1. Re:Easy Solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does buying a new DVD player fix the DVD's that you rent? There's a problem with your logic.

  105. Toddlers and DVDs by Rebar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Counterpoint: scene selection is almost invisible to toddlers I have been around. That means that when it is nearly bedtime, you can skip past the majority of Finding Nemo directly to the fun bits at The End, and have it look like The End. Toddlers know what that means, and off we happily go to brush our teeth and put on jammies.

    Ahh... scene selection. Nemo is MUCH more watchable the 20th time if you go from school to turtles to reunion to THE END.

    1. Re:Toddlers and DVDs by straybullets · · Score: 1
      Educating kids with bedtime tv is evil.
      having kids watching 20 times the same movie, even with "scene selection" is wrong.

      I'm sorry, i know sometimes there's no other way but i just had to say this !! When i was a kid i was not allowed to watch tv for more than 15 mn everyday and these were cartoons on the PBS. What happened since then that made tv so central to education ?

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    2. Re:Toddlers and DVDs by hoofie · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have any children then.

      When you are tired from working all day, and your little precious decides to run around the house rather than put her jammies on and go to bed, ANYTHING that will cause her to stop and calm down for 10-15 minutes is a god-send.

    3. Re:Toddlers and DVDs by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      having kids watching 20 times the same movie, even with "scene selection" is wrong.

      As opposed to reading them the same story 200 times? Or singing the same song with them 1000 times.

      Young kids like predidictability in certain things. 99.99% of the whole world is novel to them, so they like having some stability to hang on to.

      ObNerd:
      Rather like PHBs and Windows actually.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    4. Re:Toddlers and DVDs by Rebar · · Score: 1

      " Educating kids with bedtime tv is evil."
      You ever try educating a kid a bedtime? ;)

      Nothing educational about the TV; this is more of a give-and-take thing. You have to reward a little... not too much, as we know children need boundaries... but is this really a battle that is worth fighting, and is the outcome really that evil? I've got a wonderful child, and if he has been good there's no reason not to reward him with a movie request now and then. Too bad he hasn't seen many and therefore only knows for sure that he likes Nemo.

      My son is learning both from us and by using a computer at places like http://pbskids.com/, http://noggin.com/, and http://nickjr.com/. Sure there are some good kid TV shows on during the day and you can grab a quick shower while he is watching Dora, but TV is for the most part entertainment, and the adults and computers get to educate throught interaction.

      Now I am with you somewhat - if I lived alone I may not even have a TV, but I don't live alone, and the TV is on at least half the time during the day. Anyone have any constructive suggestions for limiting TV time for youngsters in a house where that's an unpopular option?

      Oh, and to get back on topic: the VCR is dead because, back in the day, we had 4 broadcast TV channels and it was more important to capture what little content we liked. Now we get 150 channels of crap on the satellite and there is almost always something on that can be entertaining, so no need for a VCR to bring the content-level of the TV more in line with our liking.

  106. MythTV + MediaMVP = Zero VCRs by jbr439 · · Score: 1

    3 months ago I put together a MythTV setup with a MediaMVP running mvpmc (http://mvpmc.sourceforge.net/). I haven't touched either of my 2 VCRs since, except to unplug one of them to free up a socket.

    The VCR is indeed dead - at least in my house.

  107. Pardon me but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may have missed if the good ol' DVD/VHS combo unit was mentioned in a post. For about 100 bucks (US) (Brits, how many quid?) one can have the best of both worlds. (I AM NOT A POLITICIAN!!!!!)

    Optical v. Magnetic. Sounds like it should be on PPV for /.'ers. =)

  108. Na-Na-Hey-Hey GOOD-BYYYYE! by blitz487 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but I've had a lot of trouble with poor quality VHS. I have a copy of "Tess" on VHS that has a horizontal bar that appears 1/3 the way down the screen about halfway through and lasts to the end of the tape. There's a lot of jitter from the tapes. Sometimes I hear a crinkling sound from the VHS deck, and I know that the tape has wrapped itself around the guts of the machine, and it'll be a bitch to get it out. More than once I've had to physically take the deck apart to get the jammed tape out. And, of course, rewinding is slow and sucky. VHS, begone.

    1. Re:Na-Na-Hey-Hey GOOD-BYYYYE! by karnal · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but I've had a lot of trouble with poor quality VHS. I have a copy of "Tess" on VHS that has a horizontal bar that appears 1/3 the way down the screen about halfway through and lasts to the end of the tape. There's a lot of jitter from the tapes. Sometimes I hear a crinkling sound from the VHS deck, and I know that the tape has wrapped itself around the guts of the machine, and it'll be a bitch to get it out. More than once I've had to physically take the deck apart to get the jammed tape out. And, of course, rewinding is slow and sucky. VHS, begone."

      Sounds like you have either:

      1. A crappy player. Of course, nowadays unless you pay a good price, you're always going to get a crappy player... no matter what.
      2. Dirty tape path. This is one thing that used to kill cassettes (someone would have a crappy cassette deck in their car and NEVER CLEAN IT) - if the oils and such got to the point on the path that they cause friction, your tape will wind up in the VCR instead of in the shell where it belongs.

      I've never had a tape eaten from a well-kept VCR. I've only owned 3 of them in my lifetime, but never a problem. Of course, with my latest VCR, I've never rented any tapes for viewing on it -- that can also cause problems, since one person's dirty vcr can contaminate yours from the tape (kinda sounds like VCR's can catch colds, eh?)

      --
      Karnal
  109. Yes, that TiVO ad move told me I don't want TiVO by Jamesday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the product I buy to keep on working as it's supposed to at the time I bought it, not have the company reduce its value later. I'll pick something trustable instead of TiVO.

  110. Issues/problems by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    At least with VHS VCRs, you can fastfoward through the opening advertisements. With DVD players, you cannot. It's annoying, it's anti-user friendly, and there's just way too much greed overall.

    Unfortunately, until something big happens, this will be the way it is.

    And VHS VCRs aren't dead. Low income people will still be purchasing them for dirt cheap prices. And not all VHS material is on DVD format yet. Besides home movies, there's stuff that's been bought on VHS years back that hasn't been out on DVD yet.

  111. standalone DVD burner with integrated VCR $200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be a perfect cheap solution:
    GoVideo standalone DVD burner with VCR $200

  112. Don't Panic! by jangobongo · · Score: 1

    According to the article, one store in England is phasing out VCRs because it is no longer feasible to fill up their shelf space with a product that is not moving. Plain old economics. This could mean that the market is saturated. This does not mean that VCRs are dead and buried (yet, anyway).

    I remember hearing about the death of VCRs before. About 2 or 3 years ago, someone told me that the companies that make VCRs had stopped making them. This person told me that no more new ones would be made and so stores would just be clearing out their inventories and then only DVD's would be available. Okay - that never happened.

    From the article:
    "Sales of VCRs are in decline but we still sell a lot of them. As long as there is a market for them we will continue to sell them."

    This shows me that VCRs will die only if no one ever buys them anymore or at least when so few do that its not worth it to manufacturors to keep making them or for retailers to sell them.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  113. Not dead, but only has one use now.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Other day was waiting in line at the supermarket and saw someone doing their weekly shopping - next to washing up liquid, vegtables, and milk was a DVD player, the market is saturated with cheap players that you have to re-buy every year. Its a pitty DVD recorders havn't caught on much, its like living in the dark ages where cheap VHS players couldnt record! When cheap recorders come around then i'll say VHS is dead.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  114. Lynx & Jaguar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, not to mention why the c64 beat out the atari 8 bit line, which was clearly superior, what with pokey, gtia, and antic and all..

  115. Re:I do the same thing...just with a dvd recorder. by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    please share a bit more info with us...ie what i steh model u r using , how easy it is to program etc.

    cheers

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  116. Get an OLD VHS deck... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many of the older (mechanical tuner, die cast chassis, top loading) VHS machines have AGC and sync circuitry that seems unfazed by Macrovision encoding. I have an ancient Panasonic PV-1000 that I keep around just for this reason. Short of the occasional drive belt or sensor bulb replacement, the thing just refuses to die. Of course, the fact that the thing originally sold for close to $1000 may have something to do with that. This thing is built like the proverbial "brick shithouse".

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  117. Re:The UKs largest retailer by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    My dear stratjakt

    Please permit me a small analogy , which might aid your comprehension ,our fav stores (Harrods , harvey nics , selfridges ) are like the extremely private part of the female of the species , its all about the quality . Size , my dear chap , isnt even in the picture.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  118. Re:Something Not So Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The reality is that the Chinese killed VHS".

    thanks to chinese cheap labor, you can work less and still maintain a high quality of life. you are actually taking advantage of chinese cheap labor, and at the same time it is so easy to blame chinese for this vhs-to-dvd transition. some companies do make a fortune by pushing dvd into the market, but not those chinese factories. http://en.ce.cn/Industries/Consumen-Industries/200 408/03/t20040803_1400295.shtml

  119. Sad news ... Stephen King, dead at 54 by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  120. Amusing by pablonhd · · Score: 1

    This is funny because i just disconnected my vcr and put it in the closet not even 10 min ago and then i find this article.

  121. VHS will never die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as long as DVD players can't record shows or movies. I mean, what's the point if I can't record my shows and watch them on any TV I want? For this reason, VHS is here to stay until DVD players can do the same. Besides, I still have a ton of VHS movies (I just bought a few more recently), and I am not about to throw them away.

  122. Re:Still for sale though-can't FF, blame DVDForum by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 3, Informative

    Letting the Media conglomerates decide when you can
    fast-forward is part of the original deal to get a license to build
    DVD players. Google was not immediately helpful, but the truth is out there...

  123. The VHS is dead... by ExHGamer · · Score: 0

    The VHS is dead... long life the VHS!

  124. VHS won due to cheaper licensing terms. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    What made VHS win (besides the fact it could record longer than Beta machines) was the fact JVC (a wholy-owned subsidiary of Matsushita Electic Company) offered very generous licensing terms to build VHS-compatible VCR's and VHS tapes. It also helped that VHS quickly matched Beta's attempt at higher quality recordings with VHS Hi-Fi for better-quality sound and Super VHS for better-quality pictures in the late 1980's.

  125. Please take your brain out of first gear by Anonymous+Squonk · · Score: 1

    Since the VCR is on the way out, the next logical product to be squashed by evolution is the DVD Player...which is what the author was rhetorically asking about.

    1. Re:Please take your brain out of first gear by iainl · · Score: 1

      Given that Asda have DVD-Recorders around £200 in the UK now, I think the only question is about whether there will even be any play-only machines around by the time Blu-Ray and HD-DVD start duking it out to be the one stomping on the DVD player's corpse.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  126. Huzzah for Betamax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew that in the end that Betamax would finally win and prove it's superior format. Oh wait... Betamax is gone. Long live uh uh Amiga? 8 Track, perhaps? Er uh LP? No er 78's. No er wax cylinders, maybe? And the really sad thing is that we can't blame any of it on Bill Gates and Microsoft.

    Is that the march of progress I hear?

    No, it's the sound of thousands of VHS tapes tumbling over lined up like dominoes because that's all they are good for now.

    I'll bet you can't do that with all the AOL CD's in the world!

  127. my parents are happy with my vcr by Dr.Opveter · · Score: 0

    When my parents' vcr broke i gave them mine. I wasn't using it anyway. Also i gave them about 20 tapes to record things on. I had compiled a lot of stuff on these tapes over the years. Duckman, Simpsons, Futurama, Young Ones, Bottom...
    I thought i'd want to keep these tapes forever but i realized by the time i would actually have time to watch all that stuff again it would probably be available on a much nicer format anyway (hdd, dvd, whatever comes next). Same thing with my 200+ audiotapes. I enjoyed them at the time, but they didn't stand the test of time, i just can't be bothered with them anymore. I put them on an ebay type site for the low price of 0 and there hasn't even been 1 person responding.
    But my parents are happy with my vcr to record sports and crappy crime tv series. They don't even own a dvd player.
    And neither do i (well, not a stand-alone that is, i do have a NEC dvd burner i rarely use)

    --
    Sample this!
  128. It's more to do with commodity item status by thatjavaguy · · Score: 1

    In the UK supermarkets sell VHS recorders for 50 quid or so - who'd go to a high street store where they cost 150 quid?

  129. And good riddance by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    • Rubbish picture quality (very low resolution)
    • Bulky tapes
    • Wore out really fast
    • Took ages to access particular scenes
    • Unreliable because of all those moving parts

    Try a DVD recorder. After initial reliability problems, the cheap Philips ones are now very good. When dual-layer ones become popular, they'll be even better.

    The only excuse for keeping a VCR is if you have a huge tape library, and you could easily rip that to VCD on your PC (DVD is a total waste for a VHS conversion, and most DVD players will take VCD).

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  130. Nice larconic Guardian tribute to VHS by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    "Ghosts in the machine" by the Guardian TV correspondent of many years standing Mark Lawson here

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
  131. Puh-leeze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Neurosis and psychosis because the parent refuses to reward bad behavior? You, sir, are what is wrong with America today.

  132. Publicity Coup by technogogo · · Score: 1
    Whoever in Dixons had the idea for that press release must be getting a very big bonus this year. The story got onto UK national TV news and you just cannot buy advertising like that.

    A relative of mine works in a small family owned consumer electronics shop and they have now been absolutely flooded with demand for DVD recorders. They are reaping some of the spoils of this publicity coup but I bet Dixons will be making a bundle as DVD recorders are suddenly the must-have purchase for the festive season.

  133. Werd to Bigbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ya silly turds. My only DVD player is on my computer in my room, which is devoid of couch and recliner alike. Therefore, if you please, I'd rather that Blockbuster keeps supplying VHS tapes so that I might enjoy my movies in the comforts of my living room, where my 2 dollar vcr and 10 dollar television from my local thrift shop (I'm a college student, you see) keep me entertained on those weekend evenings when I have no homework to do.

  134. In your best '30's gangster accent by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    In your best '30's gangster accent

    [Max Beta] > The enemy of my enemy is my friend, see. Together you and me, we're unstoppable, SEE; unstoppable! You and me, Dee V. Dee, we'll take over this whole world.

    [Dee V. Dee] > The spin I'm geeting says watch out for this 2-Bit Torrent cat. Word is he's got a killer distribution network and he thinks he's reeeeel swanky.

    [Max] > Don't you worry, see. We've got the dock workers, see, and the packet switchers. We'll get him, see. We'll get him and send him to DR. M. He'll never work in this town again, SEE!

  135. Will last out some more by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    Due to portability of tapes and the existing userbase, VHS will probably live on for a little bit more. For example, I will sometimes record TV shows for my girlfriend who's VCR at college can't record for some reason. Usually the next time I see her, I give her the tape and she watches it at home or at school. But if I recorded these on TIVO or any DVR, its not that simple, at least not yet. So in that regard, VHS will be there.

  136. And more... by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1
    --
    Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
  137. Dixons stopped VHS because of profits. by iainl · · Score: 1

    You're right that PVRs and DVD-Rs have yet to hit critical mass yet. For all Dixons have thrown the 40:1 ratio about these last few days about DVD players to VCRs, VHS still comfortably outsells its recordable competition.

    What this is actually about is two things:

    1) Dixons are attempting to beat their image of "only for idiots who can't shop online, or believe that their shop assistants know one end of an extension lead from the other", and promote themselves as meccas for the tech-savvy. Never going to happen, but they're trying. Saying "we're too modern for VHS" helps that.

    2) Its not that no-one is buying VCRs, but that the margins are miniscule, thanks to competition from Tesco and Asda. They would much rather sell you a 700 quid DVD+HD PVR box (that will, in turn, be obsolete in two years when HD Sky launches) than a VCR that costs one twentieth of that.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of profits. by igb · · Score: 1
      Its not that no-one is buying VCRs, but that the margins are miniscule
      That was my immediate reaction, but I can't believe that the margins on DVD players are exactly PROFIT! I suspect the problem is that most people have got a VCR, so new sales are small, they're physically bulky on the shelves and they aren't being bought by the ABC1 space that Dixons is trying to position itself to (your first point, which is a good one).

      ian

    2. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of profits. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      That was my immediate reaction, but I can't believe that the margins on DVD players are exactly PROFIT! I suspect the problem is that most people have got a VCR, so new sales are small, they're physically bulky on the shelves

      I was thinking the same thing myself- DVD players are generally cheaper than VHS nowadays. (Bearing in mind that VHS, even with all the clever tricks used to simplify the design nowadays, are very mechanical compared to DVD- servo with head, spinny(!) motor, that's about it- it's not really surprising).

      However, DVD players are still not much less bulky than VCRs. As the parent mentioned, this probably has to do with Dixons' image, and that would not be well-served if they stopped selling DVD players. Even low-margin ones...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Dixons stopped VHS because of profits. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Dixons are attempting to beat their image of "only for idiots who can't shop online, or believe that their shop assistants know one end of an extension lead from the other", and promote themselves as meccas for the tech-savvy. Never going to happen, but they're trying. Saying "we're too modern for VHS" helps that.

      Bingo.

      Have you noticed that Dixons stores seem to have become more *transparently* box-shifting operations in the past few years? They seem to have (slightly) fewer sales people, supermarket style barriers at the doors, and most importantly, boxes on display for immediate purchase, even for higher-priced items. They pleasantly surprised me by starting to sell almost reasonably-priced Canon-compatible ink carts too...

      I don't know how well this format will work in the smaller Dixons stores, though. They're pretty small to keep all the goods on immediate display, and this seems like a format better suited to their larger non-High Street stores (i.e. Currys and PC World).

      Which would explain...

      Its not that no-one is buying VCRs, but that the margins are miniscule, thanks to competition from Tesco and Asda. They would much rather sell you a 700 quid DVD+HD PVR box

      Yep (although they still sell DVD players; see the nephew(*) post to this one). VCRs are commodity items nowadays; I bought my last one as a stop-gap, and wasn't that bothered about the quality. I guess most people don't need Dixons "high-tech" (cough) image or handholding (COUGH!) for a VCR, just something damn *cheap*. I'd reckon that Tesco and friends probably sell more VCRs than the tech-stores like Dixons, though that's just a guess.

      (*) Yeah, you know what I mean. Maybe it's a niece, who cares..... though I'll stop using the analogy if it gets to "third cousin twice removed" level.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  138. Just curious... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    ... what do you need the genlock for? Anything I've ever seen described as a genlock is a thing for synchronising either computer graphics generators or frame stores to an incoming video signal. I can't see how that would be terribly helpful in capturing analogue video into a PC.


    I've got great results with an el-cheapo SAA7130 capture card, an S-VHS and a Hi8 video (even though the tapes are not recorded in S-VHS or Hi8, the s-video output makes a big difference - think of what colour crawl does to compression algorithms).

  139. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

    Car boot sales are also common in New Zealand.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  140. Re:Everyone already HAS a VCR!!!... Until they die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gotta have a VCR otherwise you can't timeshift your favourite once-a-week show.
    I thought I'd be able to do without a VCR when my last one died, but then you end up missing those late-night Grands Prix or the odd episode of The Bill. So I ended up hunting down an AU$34 (~US$20) new stereo VCR from a reputable retailer. No worries!!!

  141. Re:Err.. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain to me what is funny and/or interesting about that flash film he's linked to. I watched for a while and almost fell asleep it was so boring.

  142. Damn cassette tapes... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0, Funny

    Now if only the cassete tape would DIE!

  143. walmart has problems keeping up with demand by TrebLib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not that I like VHS in in any way shape or form ... but my wife likes to tape shows and since we can't afford a PVR we have to settle for taping the old fassion way. Anyway, to make a long storry short, we went to the two walmarts in our city, and both were completely sold out of Blank VHS tapes ..... so I guess some people will not let it die :-)

  144. Not dead, just getting old by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    1981 was the year when everyone in the UK wanted a video recorder, because Prince Charles was marrying Lady Diana Spencer and for some reason, people wanted not only to watch it, but to have a permanent record of the event. My parents went out and rented a massive Sanyo Betacord 9300. First in the street, no visual search, one-event timer. Dog's bollocks. Saved my mother's sanity when the telly blew up one night just as Coronation Street was about to start ..... we just slammed in a spare tape and hit "record" {even though it had piano keys, you didn't need to press record and play together, which was a little weirdy in those days}.

    My first VHS was an even older Ferguson 3V22 {rebadged JVC} with no freeze-frame -- there was a pause, but it blanked out the screen. And on this one you did have to press record and play together {as it should be IMHO}. It was built like a tank, all belt-driven from one motor and full of sensors, and I should have hung onto it. A new head drum would have fixed it.

    I bought my last VCR two years ago, knowing that it was going to be replaced by some kind of disc recorder. Then, in the January Sales of 2003-2004, I bought a Philips DVD recorder, which quite possibly is the best thing I ever bought that plugs in {except my bread maker}. It was expensive but it was worth it.

    I don't really think it's a big deal that Dixons are stopping selling VCRs. They are a big unit-shifter, but they're by no means the only place to buy VCRs from. What I do think is a bit worrying is that so many DVD machines are play-only devices. That's sort of the ultimate copy-protection, if you can't make the recordings yourself at all. The combination of a play-only DVD and a non-transportable HDD TV-recorder might look flashy on the surface, but scratch away a little and you'll see a lot less generality of purpose under there. Video cassettes could be carried around anywhere there was a machine that could play them; the only worry you had was whether the machine was PAL, SECAM or NTSC, and chances are the worst you would get, even with the wrong kind of player, would be a mono picture and maybe scratchy sound. Hell, that was only a factor if you were going overseas. And you could fast-forward through Simon Bates' patronising speech about piracy at the beginning of every film .....

    At least in the UK, multi-region players and fast-forward-block defeating are very definitely legal; and so will DeCSS be, if it ever gets as far as a Crown Court. {It was very nearly made law that broadcasters had to transmit an 'advertisement warning signal' to allow TV-recorders to distinguish editorial content from advertising ..... not much chance of that these days though, since the BBC is about the only advert-free broadcaster left in Europe, and there isn't enough anti-advertising sentiment in high places. Quelle honte.}

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  145. Okay, I don't get it. What was with the subliminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, some of us get the joke. (Tragically, no mod points though or you'd be +1 funny.)

  146. Widescreen by hazee · · Score: 1

    Why are all DVDs sold in the UK widescreen only? It would be trivial to encode the information onto the disc to produce a pan-scan version on demand. For this reason alone I often prefer watching things on VHS on my non-widescreen TV.

  147. for the Americans in the audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think "flea market"

  148. Also good for books by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    We read a few chapters from a book to our four year old son and five year old daughter each night. There've been some terrific successes (the kids loved "James And The Giant Peach"), but the occasional dud. The last time we were at a bookstore, we let our girl pick "The Little Princess" and started to read it a week or so ago. We hit chapters 1, 2, 3, and 35. The kids were content - they had no idea that we skipped the entire middle - and we were happy to move on to something a little less hideous.

    As a side note, reading to your kids can be a blast. The trick is not to slog through the same "little golden books" every night. Kids are pretty smart little critters, and can cope with rather sophisticated story lines if you can make the reading lively enough.

    Up next - "Through The Looking Glass".

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Also good for books by Fgarb · · Score: 1

      Check out "Princess Bride" by William Goldman.

      The whole book has a metaplot that's about how, supposedly:
      Young Billy Goldman's father read this fantastic adventure to him, and when he was older, he gave a copy to his child to read. The Child was unimpressed. Later on, he looked at it and realized that his father had only read him "the good parts," so he "wrote" the "edited" version of the story and got it published.

      Great Meta-story, if completely false...

      Anyways, the "asides" about what he "edited from the original" are, indeed, utterly uninteresting to kids, and often funny to adults.

    2. Re:Also good for books by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Check out "Princess Bride" by William Goldman.

      I've seen the movie dozens of times, and I'd always been hesitant about approaching the book. Thanks for the recommendation - we might have to add that to our "to be read" pile.

      So far, "The Mouse and the Motorcycle" and everything by Roald Dahl have been hits. We just finished "The Little Prince", and the kids also liked that (although not as much as we did). They liked "The Black Stallion", so we thought maybe they'd also enjoy "Black Beauty". We were wrong. That book is so beyond awful that I considered throwing it away when we were finished.

      I want to get my hands on the "Danny Dunn" and "Encyclopedia Brown" series some time. I loved those as a kid, and hope my kids will like them too.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  149. Thanks, folks. by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. I'll look into those. (Except MythTV, which is exactly what I'm *not* looking for, but thanks anyway.)

  150. Just curious...Genlocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... what do you need the genlock for? Anything I've ever seen described as a genlock is a thing for synchronising either computer graphics generators or frame stores to an incoming video signal. I can't see how that would be terribly helpful in capturing analogue video into a PC."

    Basically genlocking is like what a PLL does for say radio. The majority of VCR's out here are of an "adequate" quality. Good enough for tolerant TV's to handle. However the signal from VCR's leaves much to be desired, especially if you're going to archive material. The genlocking helps steady the signal, and makes the rest of the clean-up easier by feeding them a good signal to work with.

  151. Not all movies converted by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    While a great deal of the older movies are getting a cheap conversion (Extremely basic menu, no subtitles, usually 2-3 movies crammed on one disc) to DVDs and being sold for $3 at Walmart, not all titles have been converted and others are hard to come by. I seem to remember there was a big controversey when Blockbuster started dumping their VHS stock. Apparently some of their films, such as a rare version of Freaks, were not available on DVD. Some fans decided to "rescue" the tapes from dumpsters and subsequently it became Blockbuster policy to crush the tapes before disposing of them.

    Personally, I still own a VCR because I still have VHS tapes and the library still rents them. Although I'm thinking of getting rid of the TV and routing the VCR output to my computer monitor...

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  152. DVD caddy drive? by DiscoSnorlax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other words, a caddy drive like Macs used to have, except the disc comes in a caddy already so you don't need to swap discs in the caddys or buy piles of disc caddys.

  153. Ah, that's not a genlock by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    That's a timebase corrector. My Hi8 camera has one built in which is "good enough". If you're capturing to a computer, then there's little point - you only end up digitising the signal twice.

  154. Not dead to me... by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    VHS won't be dead to me until my VCR moves from on top of my TV to The Closet of Obsolete Techonolgy with my Psion Revo, Minidisc player and Microsoft Handheld PC Professional Edition device. I still use VHS when I have to, not everything is on DVD yet, and recording stuff on DVD is still expensive and not as easy as popping in a VHS tape.

  155. Re:Time to buy a VCR is past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they all garble any recordings you try to make that have the DO NOT COPY signal in them. The time to buy a quality cassette video cassette *recorder* was a few years back.

  156. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

    In the US we have thes things called yard sales where people put all the junk they want to get rid of on the lawn and people will just stop when they see it.

    --
    Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
  157. Re:Buy a VCR... Now! -- Boot sales by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    ...thinks for a moment...

    Yep, I've seen this both on the Simpsons and Six Feet Under, so you must be right! :-D

  158. Re:I do the same thing...just with a dvd recorder. by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    It's the Philips DVDR 70, does dvd+r +rw, very easy to program (simply go into a menu and either enter the video+ programming number or select a date and time from the on-screen menu, everything is done through a snazzy looking menu that appears on your TV).

    It's got s-video, scart and comp in, scart out, audio out, svideo out.

    All in all a very nice machine indeed, it's crazy how cheap it is now.

    --
    I am NaN
  159. Amiga by boffy_b · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall these being available for Amiga back in the day, though I can't remember if they attached to the parallel port or the Amiga's own RF modulator.

    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
  160. VHS can be better if you have kids by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    I have a friend with four kids and a year old black lab, and I swear he feeds them a steady diet of sugar and cocaine. Hyper. Anyway, he still uses VHS because the tapes will survive just about anything other than the backseat of a car in summer. Any DVD's he buys he makes copies of, because the kids will manage to trash the disk the second you aren't looking.