The answer to that would be to let the 'local automakers' leave your country rather than prop them up. (like happened here, Australia) Short term pain, but probably long term gain. Carmakers like Elon Musk/Tesla with very different car making models aren't likely to oppose this.
What you can't do is get it without asking. IOW, bulk scanning and indexing is not doable. And it shouldn't be. If you want some info, go get a court order for *just* that info. Don't legislate a fishing expedition for all of the info.
Yes. Sometimes I'd like to lose certain high frequencies. People whose voices seem to 'overlap' the said frequencies seem almost to beat with them. Argh!
And were fantastically cheaper if you bought billions of them Later EPROMS came without windows and were called OTP (one time programmable) - these hit a good price point - do your dev with the quartz windowed ones, and small production runs with OTP
Look, counterfeiting is wrong. But destroying the property of an end user, most likely unaware of the counterfeit device, is both wrong and illegal. Period.
Actually, counterfeiting is also both wrong and illegal. Period.
What? So if I shoot my neighbor,
What the hell is it with everyone using violent crime analogies? What does shooting someone have anything at all to do with a company issuing a firmware update that disables unlicensed counterfeit chips?
Everyone loves a strawman argument. And 'shooting my neighbour' is an extreme strawman.
They're not causing irreparable harm, you can fix it. (they write the PID to 0, you can re-write it to something else) They make the drivers, they sell the legitimate chips, seems fair to me.
Slashdot Mirror
And commit improvements back to the repository.
The answer to that would be to let the 'local automakers' leave your country rather than prop them up. (like happened here, Australia) Short term pain, but probably long term gain. Carmakers like Elon Musk/Tesla with very different car making models aren't likely to oppose this.
Two episodes to kill him, I could live with that. Perhaps they'd clone him, and we'd have an army of 10 million jarjars to deal with. Ugh.
Evidence by anecdote
Well played. DST for the Doomsday Clock.
What you can't do is get it without asking. IOW, bulk scanning and indexing is not doable. And it shouldn't be. If you want some info, go get a court order for *just* that info. Don't legislate a fishing expedition for all of the info.
Yes. Sometimes I'd like to lose certain high frequencies. People whose voices seem to 'overlap' the said frequencies seem almost to beat with them. Argh!
... Will there be a bar in the back of Uber cabs? Not sure I'd trust it not to be roofied.
And were fantastically cheaper if you bought billions of them Later EPROMS came without windows and were called OTP (one time programmable) - these hit a good price point - do your dev with the quartz windowed ones, and small production runs with OTP
I volunteer to write the retention schedule for it. Might as well handle redaction whilst I'm doing it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
That won't accept the umpire (court's) decision.
http://www.kleinbottle.com/ Lots of fun stuff. Anyone reading can give me this shit.
verb, I hope, not noun.
And requests from Smirnoff wanting you to 'friend' them.
Which is why I fake my address as coming from Florida.
Is referencing Nixon akin to a Godwin type reference, in a skewed way?
WW II? Think WW I
http://qz.com/290183/in-2014-c...
This was satire that got misfiled.
Again, I'd say that needs to be proven. Isn't the sequence generally something like:
chip maker -> device maker -> distributor -> retail chain -> local store -> cashier who actually carries out transaction -> buyer
Exactly how far along that chain does knowledge of counterfeit go?
All the way to the end. If the price is 'too good to be true' then the customer knows.
Look, counterfeiting is wrong. But destroying the property of an end user, most likely unaware of the counterfeit device, is both wrong and illegal. Period.
Actually, counterfeiting is also both wrong and illegal. Period.
What? So if I shoot my neighbor,
What the hell is it with everyone using violent crime analogies? What does shooting someone have anything at all to do with a company issuing a firmware update that disables unlicensed counterfeit chips?
Everyone loves a strawman argument. And 'shooting my neighbour' is an extreme strawman.
They're not causing irreparable harm, you can fix it. (they write the PID to 0, you can re-write it to something else)
They make the drivers, they sell the legitimate chips, seems fair to me.
Why is this making me think of chair-throwing?
Hardly needs OLED - a mono watch could do a blue-screen
Perhaps because that's the way the world works. (including the +5 mod)