Slashdot Mirror


The Joker Behind the Signetics 25120 Write-Only Memory Chip Hoax

New submitter st1lett0 writes: Now and in years past, electronic engineers and hobbyists alike have enjoyed the classic 1972 April Fool's joke by Signetics of the Signetics 25120 Write-Only Memory chip. Now it seems that the previously anonymous practical joker has identified himself and stepped forward with new information to correct and complete the story.

100 comments

  1. Joke? They're real! by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    These days used for cheap knock-off memory sticks.

    1. Re:Joke? They're real! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whereas modern legislation is of the Write Once, Read & Think Heaven's Leaving Everyone Short Shrifted (WORTHLESS) variety.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Joke? They're real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Joke? They're real! by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      Government agencies like CIA and NSA use Signetics 25120 to store very sensitive information. After writing the data, the original source is then destroyed...

    4. Re:Joke? They're real! by Rei · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is just misconceptualized. Think of read-only memory, like say DVDs. They're not *100* read-only. Data is written to them once in an irreversible manner before their operational life begins using an alternative write mechanism, and then during their design life they're read-only. If you apply the same paradigm to write-only memory, it's perfectly reasonable for, say, a datalogger: data is written during the operation of the device, then when the device has completed its task, the memory is retrieved and read in an irreversible manner.

      --
      "We consider that six courts and an asylum claim are a rather odd way of returning to Sweden within a month."
    5. Re:Joke? They're real! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is just misconceptualized. Think of read-only memory, like say DVDs. They're not *100* read-only. Data is written to them once in an irreversible manner before their operational life begins using an alternative write mechanism, and then during their design life they're read-only. If you apply the same paradigm to write-only memory, it's perfectly reasonable for, say, a datalogger: data is written during the operation of the device, then when the device has completed its task, the memory is retrieved and read in an irreversible manner.

      I think you missed the point - if you can read it, then it's not write-only memory.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Joke? They're real! by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Except that DVDs are no more written than vinyl records. They're stamped with a non-adjustable template during the manufacturing process. Perhaps you are thinking of DVD-Rs, but that's a write-once media, not read-only.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Joke? They're real! by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. If you can write to it, then it's not Read Only Memory. Yet, somehow, at some point, all ROM was written to, or there would be nothing to read later.

    8. Re:Joke? They're real! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. If you can write to it, then it's not Read Only Memory. Yet, somehow, at some point, all ROM was written to, or there would be nothing to read later.

      Actually mask roms are never written to. The circuits are hard-wired. If the mask is defective, you throw the chip out.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:Joke? They're real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROMs are not written to. The ROM is directly etched with values using a photographic process.

    10. Re:Joke? They're real! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is just misconceptualized. Think of read-only memory, like say DVDs. They're not *100* read-only. Data is written to them once in an irreversible manner before their operational life begins using an alternative write mechanism, and then during their design life they're read-only. If you apply the same paradigm to write-only memory, it's perfectly reasonable for, say, a datalogger: data is written during the operation of the device, then when the device has completed its task, the memory is retrieved and read in an irreversible manner.

      We call that core memory.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Joke? They're real! by Khyber · · Score: 0

      I think you failed basic semiconductor electronics. ROMs are lithographically etched with the code hard-wired in the design. Back then, the only way to erase was to expose the semiconductor ROM chip to UV light to destroy the chip. That's why they came with clear windows with a sticker over them. Remove sticker, zap with UV for a few seconds, dead ROM.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Joke? They're real! by BarefootClown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the perspective of the CPU, a printer is write-only memory.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    13. Re:Joke? They're real! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      ROMs are lithographically etched...

      A.k.a. written.

    14. Re:Joke? They're real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are confusing mask ROMs and EPROMs. EPROMs were writable, but had a window for erasing them with UV light. That did not destroy the EPROM; it simply changed all the data to 0xff. The EPROM could then be programmed with new data. Note that it was called "programming" the EPROM, not writing to it. Mask ROMs could not be erased, and did not have windows.

    15. Re:Joke? They're real! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Those were UVROMs. ROMs were series of rows and columns, with the columns that needed to be 0 connected to the ground by diodes, and the ones that needed to be 1 left floating. As others said above, they were originally etched during time of manufacture, and once out of fab and package/test, they were done. No writing evar!

    16. Re:Joke? They're real! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      For non volatile memories - EPROMs, EEPROMs, Flash, erasing means setting all the data cells (within a specified area) to '1'. Programming means setting certain data cells in a given address with 0. Writing means erasing certain data cells to 1 and then programming the bits that need to be made 0 to 0.

    17. Re:Joke? They're real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of read-only memory, like say DVDs.

      Aren't they WORM (Write once, read many)?

    18. Re:Joke? They're real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days used for cheap knock-off memory sticks.

      It's not just the knockoffs. Within the past six months I've seen store-bought brand-name Lexar and PNY memory sticks fail shortly after backing up a large number of files onto them, or in other words, using them once. Do they not put equipment through burn-in tests anymore? My first memory stick lasted five years and I haven't had one last a whole year since.

    19. Re:Joke? They're real! by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I always created my best APL programs with write only memory.

    20. Re:Joke? They're real! by tibit · · Score: 0

      You confuse EPROM, PROM and ROM. A mask-programmed ROM cannot be erased without destroying it. UV light will do nothing to a ROM. A PROM uses cells with electrically-destructible fuses or cells with stored electrical charge - it is electrically programmed, not mask-programmed. UV light will do nothing to a fuse-based PROM, but will erase the charge-based PROM. The charge-based PROMs are also called OTP EPROM (one time programmable, but not eraseable, so a misnomer). The addition of a quartz window turns a non-eraseable charge-based PROM into an EPROM, where E stands for eraseable. Finally, with addition of erase circuitry, an EPROM becomes an EEPROM where it can be electrically erased. Most EEPROMs can still be erased with UV light, if you were to access the bare die - although some EEPROMs shield the data-storing capacitors to protect the data from reverse-engineering/tampering. Such high-integrity parts won't erase in presence of UV, even if you de-encapsulated the chips.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    21. Re:Joke? They're real! by tibit · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Some modern color printers have built-in optical scanners used for color alignment. They certainly can read what they wrote on the image transfer belt. I have one like that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    22. Re:Joke? They're real! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I think you failed basic semiconductor electronics. ROMs are lithographically etched with the code hard-wired in the design. Back then, the only way to erase was to expose the semiconductor ROM chip to UV light to destroy the chip. That's why they came with clear windows with a sticker over them. Remove sticker, zap with UV for a few seconds, dead ROM.

      You are describing UV erase EPROM. Not mask ROM.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    23. Re:Joke? They're real! by unitron · · Score: 1

      But the article is about Write-Only Memory. It can't be read, it can only be written to.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    24. Re:Joke? They're real! by Meski · · Score: 1

      I volunteer to write the retention schedule for it. Might as well handle redaction whilst I'm doing it.

    25. Re:Joke? They're real! by Meski · · Score: 1

      And were fantastically cheaper if you bought billions of them Later EPROMS came without windows and were called OTP (one time programmable) - these hit a good price point - do your dev with the quartz windowed ones, and small production runs with OTP

  2. EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    ...If you look on the last note on the 25120 data sheet, I had included, âoeDue credit to EIMAC for inspiration.â.

    I had always admired an EIMAC high powered vacuum tube spoof data sheet put out by Eitel-McCullough,Inc. I saw it when I was a teen Ham Operator and must have memorized it. That was in the late 1940â(TM)s.

    So far I havenâ(TM)t relocated a copy of the EIMAC spoof data sheet. You need it to see the relevance. It pictured a melted EIMAC power tube and offered humorous specifications. If you know where there is a copy, let me know ...

    Anyone here got a copy of the EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet?

    Wanna share with us?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have a look and let you know.

      I'll have a look and let you know.

    2. Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I have a scan saved to WOM somewhere.

    3. Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Informative

      There were actually TWO spoof Eimac datasheets that circulated. The one the author referred to (with the melted tube) was for a type called a "Wemac 1Z2Z", and doesn't appear to be online anywhere. The other sheet describes a "Umac 606 Phantasatron", and is available here:

      http://www.tubecollectors.org/...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    4. Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I found an old ebay listing for the wemac 1z2z sheet.

    5. Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by FutrDreams · · Score: 2

      Found it. April, 2007, The VHF Transmitter -Keystone VHF Club, Inc.
      http://ns81.webmasters.com/*w3...

      A CLASSIC FROM THE PAST
      (Printed in the November 1, 1957 issue of the
      Transmitter Newsletter)
      WEMAC- THE ONE ZED TWO ZED TUBE
      Slightly tentative data (see notes at bottom)
      The Weman 1Z2Z is a Traveling Ripple tube (1) designed for
      the phone man (2) superceding the UMAC 606.
      The 1Z2Z is of radical (3) design. It does however still retain the
      urinated tungsten (4) cathode which proved so successful in the UMAC 606
      (5). Cooling is accomplished by ventilation and removing the heat. This is
      readily done at the North Pole (6) by means of a fan. At the Equator, a
      bigger (7) is needed.
      The Y3 Grid used in earlier tubes has been superceded by a Y4
      grid in the 1Z2Z. Since the tube does not have a grid, the choice is a wise
      one (8).
      The profulgment stigmetic type of construction permits an
      untrimmed electron beam to pass into the hypodirec channel (9) where the
      beam is modulated by calistral encabulization, thus producing the ripple.
      This ripple is amplified in the Galoidal Plammet (10) cavity and is carried
      by mongratic diffusion into the catcher cavity. One can readily see that
      applications are unlimited (11).
      General Characteristics
      Electrical:
        Filament: Urinated Tungsten
        Voltage – adjust (12)
        Current – adjust (12)
        Amplification factor (Average) 30 Ohms
        Indirect capacity – Ghommet Mongrat (13) – 1/5th gallon
      Mechanical:
        Maximum overall dimensions – 36 X 22 X 34 inches
        Height – 5 feet 6 inches
        Shipping weight (14) – 123 lbs
        Application of the 1Z2Z
      Because of its unique construction, the 1Z2Z can serve as as
      oscillator, modulator, or amplifier. The 1Z2Z also acts as a memory tube. It
      has a remarkable memory for certain telephone numbers and next years
      income taxes. When used as a Flip-Flop circuit, the bias must be adjusted to
      prevent flipping out a telephone number while flopping out a tax return..
      Many of the applications are secret and highly classified (15).
      Notes:
      (1) A traveling ripple has a much higher frequency then a traveling wave
      (2) A noted phone man, W6QD, states as follows: “While we’re not so
      young as we used to be, we are indeed honored to be able to make a
      pregnant statement regarding the 1Z2Z tube. We believe that the 1Z2Z
      tube will ultimately replace the transistor.
      (3) Excuse us, Mr. McCarthy
      (4) In order to obtain a pure source of Uranium for treating the Tungsten,
      a plant for processing this material was established in the Virgin
      Islands. Subsequent developments however, showed that the raw
      material from this source is not different from that of any other source.
      (5) A data sheet on the 606 will be furnished upon request.
      (6) Eskimos do not fish in Winter.
      (7) Wonder what became of Sally?
      (8) Y4
      (9) It will also work on Channel 13.
      (10) Sounds like “Sputnik”
      (11) i.e. Burning off warts
      (12) Tentative date
      (13) users of the 1Z2Z are cautioned that the price is subject to change
      without notice. The raw materials used in the Mongrat & Golmmet are
      imported from Hong Kong, and the cost of these materials vary
      depending upon the prevailing rate of exchange of the Hong Kong
      Tael. Few people realize that the Tael is the ancient media of
      monetary exchange of China. The Tael as a medium of exchange
      actually exists in the form of a slipper like shaped piece of soft silver.
      In fact, the silver is so pure and soft that it may be readily cut into
      sections with a sharp knife. This method is used in making change,
      and the sections are simply known as “pieces of silver”.
      (14) With dimensions like that, anyone would be crazy to ship it
      (15) Watch Winchell’s column

  3. "Passed" like throwing a penny into a wishing well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may make you think you feel better but truth is you don't, and you are out a penny.

    Like Carlin said, everything dies. Everything? Everything.

  4. About time.... by cornicefire · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting to find out about this one. Waiting a long time.

  5. 31 mega pixel background image by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Jeez, I know we've all got super-fast broadband and the like, but is there really any good reason to have a 31 megapixel background image?

    Remember, every byte transmitted hastens the heat death of the universe!

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a 4.3 mb background image, always amusing

    2. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the poor guy's image program was stored on write-only memory, give him a break already.

    3. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Jeez, I know we've all got super-fast broadband and the like, but is there really any good reason to have a 31 megapixel background image?

      Remember, every byte transmitted hastens the heat death of the universe!

      Actually, that image is the actual add from the magazine!
      Thanks for pointing that out... the schematic is hilarious!

    4. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "add"? Was there also a multiplication? Maybe a square root?

    5. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus christ and it's actually 4MB as well, we might as well be slashdotting the backbone of an entire country.

    6. Re:31 mega pixel background image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I explained this to my sister when she was doing her blog. Her images were being presented at the size you'd expect for a web-page, but they were loading really slowly. I dug in and realized she'd uploaded full sized versions from the camera. Even phone cameras are producing over-sized images now. I think she switched it all over to FaceBook. Does FB automatically reduce the image for page presentation? Given their scale, just imagine the savings not only for them, but everybody else.

  6. So it was him all along! by excelsior_gr · · Score: 2

    I just knew that the Jocker was behind all this! It's about time we locked him back in Arkham and threw away the key!

    Oh, wait...

    1. Re:So it was him all along! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Dog was Jocker ... then WHO WAS PHONE??

  7. It might not be so ludicrous by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    A memory chip that can only be written to could be quite secure. And before you laugh obviously there would have to be another way to retrieve the data - perhaps plugging it into a special board with completely different voltages or even taking the lid off - that the machine its sitting in would be able to do. I could see a use for this sort of thing in espionage. Store the data on this chip and send it off but if its intercepted the enemy can't figure out how to get the data out of it since any read operation they try simply fails.

    1. Re:It might not be so ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe not, but it won't happen on *this* device. Did you see the block diagram? The data-in line is simply inverted twice and presented as the data-out line without actually going into the memory cells at all. Unless it uses some mystical field-effect-at-a-distance technique, it's not going to couple the data-input signal to any of the memory. Just as well. It keeps the data safe from being recorded.

      This device could point to the possibility of a real device. Even better is to write to the memory after encrypting the data with the public key of an asymmetric key pair.

      The spec sheet was a hoot. One of my biggest laughs came from something truthy: the curve plotting the number of unruined pins as a function of the number of socket insertions. I haven't had a failure rate quite as dismal as that curve, but I've sure bent my share of pins that way.

    2. Re:It might not be so ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A memory chip that can only be written to could be quite secure. And before you laugh obviously there would have to be another way to retrieve the data

      Then it wouldn't be WOM, you tool!

    3. Re: It might not be so ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welease Woger!

  8. AH, the good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember when electrical engineering in the West was still a viable career choice? With some semblance of social worth, stability and employer-employee respect?

    Can you imagine this kind of joke happening today?

    1) You think the kind of student that studies EE these days is actually interested in electronics and could appreciate the joke?
    2) That an employer/HR dep't would tolerate these kinds of hijinks?

    Just seems electrical engineering is just a gigantic faceless operation now, more of a nuisance than the central reason for a company.

    1. Re:AH, the good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      damn, my 2nd choice was being a milkman. gonna go kill myself now.

    2. Re: AH, the good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you never read the story.
      It originally was a protest by an engineer against the an overbearing sign off procedure. It was released as a joke later.

    3. Re: AH, the good old days by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why someone was still employed after reading the story myself. Next they made an ad?? Yeah heads would roll in today's more hostile work environment.

      Maybe I just worked for shitty employers recently? But I heard back then you stayed with a company for 30 years. So different today where firing 15% every year is the new rage. Sigh ...

    4. Re: AH, the good old days by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly trade my modern computer and phone for the lifestyle of the 1960s-1990s. Something happened quite recently to make work much more hostile and corrosive.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    5. Re: AH, the good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was called Ronald Reagan.

    6. Re: AH, the good old days by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Globalization.

    7. Re:AH, the good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your points are valid, but this one

      1) You think the kind of student that studies EE these days is actually interested in electronics and could appreciate the joke?

      I thought I was the only one who thought that..

      I dropped out of electronics well over a decade ago, as one day, I thought, having just witnessed said feat, 'how the hell can someone gain an Electronics Engineering degree with honours having never touched a soldering iron once?', quit that game about three months later..

      I take it things are worse now?

    8. Re: AH, the good old days by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I think of it as trying to apply a social model based on scarcity while we are awash in surplus.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    9. Re: AH, the good old days by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a social model where 99.9% of society endures scarcity while .1% enjoys a surplus.

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    10. Re: AH, the good old days by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      In older times companies were proud of their real leaders (NOT referring to management necessarily). That included engineers who had major accomplishments and who had earned respect for a lifetime of work. Those are the kind of people who could make such a joke and client's customers would know it was that person's joke, because they trusted that leader and had long success with their work.

      Now companies only brag about their C?O people, everyone else is nameless faceless disposable droid

    11. Re: AH, the good old days by craighansen · · Score: 1

      No, you read the inaccurate story. RTFA and you will be demisinformed.

    12. Re:AH, the good old days by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I am amazed at the kind of scut work "engineers" do these days. Electrical engineers in the days of yore were scientists, physicists.

      I used to work for a company that used label printers. I mean high-speed printers for production lines. These machines are all ready and set to go from the box. Why do you need someone to go to university for 4 years and go through three interviews to check a few wires, enter a few digits and look at the end result of the printed label?

      You need engineers to design the machines, some engineers to mass-produce them, and technicians, not engineers, to install them.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    13. Re: AH, the good old days by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Of course! What he did had no effect during his administration nor the next 2, but kicked in 12 years later!

  9. 1N000 by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Funny
    I used to have a whole box of 1N000 smoke-emitting-diodes.

    They are easily recognised by the colour code "three black bands on a black background".

    They are normally used to supply the "magic smoke" required by electronic systems to operate at full power, but I believe there are other uses.

    I had a data sheet for a Motorola WOM as well - I believe from about the same date.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  10. I use these devices by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    for my backups. Backup speed increases significantly and only slightly reduces the likelihood that I will be able to restore the data.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    1. Re:I use these devices by bughunter · · Score: 2

      Most of my DVR contents are stored using WOMEN (write once maybe erase never) memory.

      My fault for installing a 12TB RAID Array.

      Now my wife records everything, but watches almost none of it.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:I use these devices by unitron · · Score: 1

      With your kind permission, there's a long-running thread at tivocommunity.com

      http://www.tivocommunity.com/t...

        where this would be an apropos entry.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. I'am also stepping forward. by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    I invented the hoax "Free to Play".

  12. more useful than Intel's EEPROMs by dltaylor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a time when some of Intel's EEPROMs (1702As, IIRC, but, maybe, 2048s) were write/read-maybe. Seems some materials guy got a really good deal on some clay to make the ceramic carrier. Only problem was that the clay was radioactive enough for the emissions to change the stored data. Back in those days (1702s were only 256 BYTES), the storage cells weren't all that robust, so enough decay particles hitting the cells could flip them.

    Think THAT didn't take a while to track down?

  13. I wasn't orginal? by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bumming...I invented the Write Only Drive while at college. Now, it looks like I infringed on the Patent. Mine, however, used the Pauli-Exclusion and Heisenberg Uncertainty Principles to store information on each atom. Problem was, we hadn't figured out how to get the data back out (it was just a s SCSI cable going into a black box. I think we just needed Heisenberg Compensators.

    Even though we published our "Announcement" it during our April's Fools edition of our Newsletter, we received one call from a company wanting to commercially build it. We had to explain it was a joke.

  14. I think the confusion is that by JasonGoatcher · · Score: 1

    Most people think of WORM memory when they read this stuff.

    I'm autistic, and I totally understand why people get confused about this. If you want to be really rigorous in how you talk, that's fine, but realize that not everyone is going to be that way.

    I used to get pissed that people call the United States a democracy, since that word isn't in any of the major documents. Then I took the stick out of my ass.

    Not trying to insult anyone, just saying.

    1. Re:I think the confusion is that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What did you do with the stick? Where is it now?

  15. Second story on that site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a second story on that site. He wrote the spec and they ignored him on wikipedia. He can even produce the original draft copies. They told him to pound sand and 'just go make a blog about it'.

    That is sad.

    1. Re:Second story on that site by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      I've dealt with the moderator people at Wikipedia myself. Thanks to that experience, I'll never ever donate to the Wikipedia foundation. They may as well just stop sending the ads - because I'm not interested.

  16. Write-only languages by quenda · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unlike WOM, write-only languages are all too real.
    I can't even read my own PERL scripts if they are more than a week old.

    1. Re:Write-only languages by ZeroSama · · Score: 1

      Unlike WOM, write-only languages are all too real. I can't even read my own PERL scripts if they are more than a week old.

      ever thought of... ya' know... commenting your code?

      --
      I read /. for the comments...
    2. Re:Write-only languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike WOM, write-only languages are all too real.
      I can't even read my own PERL scripts if they are more than a week old.

      I always assume that I'm not actually writing the Perl code I type, but that I'm channelling something...
      (my excuse, and I'm sticking to it..I've got Perl code that has been running almost continuously for over seven years now which, I'll freely admit, I'm frightened to look at, lest I cause the apocalypse or something...but hey, the data and output graphs look fine...)

    3. Re:Write-only languages by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Commenting individual lines of code, is for the most part, a bad idea. Code should be clear enough, such that somebody well versed in the programming language knows what is going on without the help of comments. Commenting functions so that you know what they do is another matter entirely, and should be done. But if a language doesn't let you write clear enough such that you can understand it later without comments, I would highly suggest using another language. If you rely on comments to tell you what the code is doing, those comments are going to get out of sync with what the code is actually doing, and be more confusing than if they weren't there at all. Except in cases like using assembly language, where you can't write meaningful code, you really shouldn't be resorting to explaining what code is doing in comments.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Write-only languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are my +1 Funny mod points when I want them?

    5. Re:Write-only languages by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a shame that the ideal use case for the 25120 didn't come along for several more years.

    6. Re:Write-only languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if a language doesn't let you write clear enough such that you can understand it later without comments, I would highly suggest using another language.

      It is absolutely possible to write clearly and understandably in Perl. It's just that the language is optimized in favor of allowing people to write tersely. So people who know how to write Perl likely learned because they valued terseness. This leads to programs that are terse but impenetrable. Which leads to people who value clarity picking another language. Which means that the only people left are those who would rather be terse than clear. It's a nasty, self-reinforcing cycle.

  17. Oh, it was The Joker all along? by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Did Batman catch him?

  18. EWOM by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I hear that next year they are coming out with an Erasable Write Only Memory so you can re-use it when you run out of memory.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  19. Dark Emitting Diode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once built a dark emitting diode, the first single-terminal semiconductor device.

    I needed to block a photodiode to test a circuit, so I cut a small piece of heat shrink tubing to fit over a TO-39 package, notched out for the tab on the package, shrunk the top, plugged it with a blob of solder, and stuck in a single wire.

    1. Re:Dark Emitting Diode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame you stopped developing it. You could have been in on the ground floor of a new technology had you gone on to invent the semiconductor DASAR.

    2. Re:Dark Emitting Diode by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I am not too sure about that: I had a colleague who worked for a firm that used to manufacture tunnel monodes - a kind of single terminal tunnel diode. The tunnel diode is noted for having negative resistance. the resistance of a tunnel monode is the square root of -1!

      They were extremely useful for one particular application, and indeed the best available solution in 1963, but the 60's intervened, and I don't actually remember what the application was (LSD was legal then) - I vaguely recall I was working on a time machine when I first heard about tunnel monodes. That was shortly before the project to show the Ike and Tina Turner show in your own home.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  20. Re:"Passed" like throwing a penny into a wishing w by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Umm, and what exactly is the distinction between feeling better and *thinking* you feel better? We are after all talking about a totally subjective experience, and virtually all of the research on the subject says that virtually nothing objectively measurable has any lasting impact on your feelings* - it's all down to self-imposed changes in attitude and perception.

    *Okay, so theres a fair number of psychoactive drugs that can have a effect while taken regularly - but that's probably not any better of an idea just because you have a prescription, and heaven help you if you stop.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  21. Other hoaxes by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    There were other component hoaxes.

    BD-1 Battery Discharger, also had a product spec printed. Marketing actually heard from a customer who wanted samples.

    To compliment the Light Emitting Diode (LED), a company offered the Dark Emitting Diode (DED).

    Hard to top the WOM though. I actually used that term in a meeting involving computers. Reaction was deer in the headlights from the IT folks. Had to quickly clue them in.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Other hoaxes by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Also the "Little Wonder" fuse blower - a NO switch shorting the mains supply through the fuse "under test". My grandfather claimed he worked for a company that sold them - but he also claimed loads of things too!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  22. That's not a joke! by putaro · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do you think /dev/null is implemented?

    1. Re:That's not a joke! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      That is in older machines; with the advent of virtualization and the possibility the machine might be virtualized, the device is now fully implemented in software with a FINO queueing algorithm (first in never out).

    2. Re:That's not a joke! by craighansen · · Score: 1

      I thought it was IEFBR14 running on an RTL emulation of an IBM 360/91.

  23. Linux Uses it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /dev/null anyone?

  24. Apple iphone by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    The new apple iphone A13 processor will have 1GB of EWOM as well as a patented solid state turboencabulator.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  25. nice :-) Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Fubari · · Score: 1

    Nice :-)
    length: 1.076 cubits
    diameter: 0.643 cubit
    net weight: 0.069 stone
    shipping weight: not shippable

    1. Re:nice :-) Re:EIMAC Spoof Data Sheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite is "The pressure drop measured at the hole is equal to free fingers of Old Crow"

  26. I have a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a copy of the original Signetics April Fool Joke adv for the "Write-only Memory Chip". I usually post a printout of it on my office wall. I especially like the "drain" in the lower right corner of the schematic! :-)

  27. Jokes II by vandamme · · Score: 1

    The Darkness Emitting Arsenide Diode (DEAD).

    The Electro-Voice Rearaxial Softspeaker from about 1966 is a real hoot.

    Some microwave components company put out a "Our Company" pamphlet that was a real knee-slapper. It had the usual corporate description of operations with 1920's era photographs. "Our retirement plan...." a graveyard.

  28. C64 kind of used this by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    So, to squeeze all the memory in 16 bits of address line, certain areas were overlays. In particular, there was an overlay of video memory that overlapped app memory space. How did they work this out? Once your program was running and you mapped the additional memory in, any writes from user code went to the memory (no self modifying code) and any reads came from the video rasterizer.

    From the perspective of your program, write only memory.

  29. One of a kind by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Those others are great fun. 8-)

    But the 25120 WOM chip was the only one I know of that was in the actual company catalog, has an actual copyright and the data sheet could be ordered from the company!

    And it actually created "buzz" and sales for the company (for other chips).

    One guy I knew, insisted for years that it was real... 8-P