"Theft of secrets" seems correct to me, as once you divulge the information against their wishes it is no longer a secret. The information may still be there, but its secrecy is not.
Interesting that they are finally implementing artifacts after pulling them out shortly after release. Will be interested to see how they balance them.
If you haven't lived there for five years, it is easy to make the case that you no longer have an understanding of local concerns that the local Member of Parliament is meant to represent.
Basically your entire argument is that if you aren't educated enough ("enough" being defined by you I guess) then you should be stripped of your right to vote. Are you fine with having people in Canada disenfranchised if they aren't following the news closely enough?
Going to have to disagree. Fingerprints (all biometrics) are identification, not authentication. Just like a SSN, if you cannot change it then it is not a secret.
There was a time when businesses could legally discriminate based upon race. Most of us look back on that and see how bigoted it was and are glad we are on the right side of history. Same thing will happen here, it just takes time for some people to see it.
Object to what on religious grounds? This ruling has zero impact on any religion. It is bizarre that you think people fighting for their constitutional rights were "making a big deal" about it.
I work in InfoSec and this is spot on. Until a lot of people die the private sector will never take security seriously as a whole. Target, Home Depot, Experian, etc. make good news stories, but they really haven't impacted information security practices.
Slashdot Mirror
Instead of being insulting, perhaps address the question or at the very least explain what "civics lesson" I failed to learn.
New York and California do not get to dictate who is president of the entire country.
It's better to have a smaller swing-state dictate the president of the entire country?
It's like 10,000 peers when all you need is a seed.
"Theft of secrets" seems correct to me, as once you divulge the information against their wishes it is no longer a secret. The information may still be there, but its secrecy is not.
Set phasers on pedantic.
The cost is passed on to us "actual American humans" in the form of higher taxes and premiums.
For high-level information security experience with the associated clearance it is not that competitive.
And yet Yahoo stock was unphased by this news. In fact, it is up today.
Where is the link to delete your /. account?
It was extremely clear to me, but English is my first language so that may be why.
Physical shit is cheaper anyway.
Nope. Not even close.
Interesting that they are finally implementing artifacts after pulling them out shortly after release. Will be interested to see how they balance them.
If you haven't lived there for five years, it is easy to make the case that you no longer have an understanding of local concerns that the local Member of Parliament is meant to represent.
Basically your entire argument is that if you aren't educated enough ("enough" being defined by you I guess) then you should be stripped of your right to vote. Are you fine with having people in Canada disenfranchised if they aren't following the news closely enough?
That is hilarious. And it's so bizarre I can't even take it seriously as a troll.
Going to have to disagree. Fingerprints (all biometrics) are identification, not authentication. Just like a SSN, if you cannot change it then it is not a secret.
This is /. Having horrific "editors" is to be expected. I wonder what it pays to click accept on a story every hour or so.
So it is a fighter?
the F-117 is not a fighter
Refresh my memory. What does the F stand for again?
There was a time when businesses could legally discriminate based upon race. Most of us look back on that and see how bigoted it was and are glad we are on the right side of history. Same thing will happen here, it just takes time for some people to see it.
Object to what on religious grounds? This ruling has zero impact on any religion. It is bizarre that you think people fighting for their constitutional rights were "making a big deal" about it.
Doesn't the fact of parallel construction kind of destroy that argument?
I think you underestimate the pay rate of many trade skill jobs. As a bonus, you cannot offshore them, unlike IT.
The person I was replying to was clearly referencing the summary.
The summary makes no mention of the author's gender.
I work in InfoSec and this is spot on. Until a lot of people die the private sector will never take security seriously as a whole. Target, Home Depot, Experian, etc. make good news stories, but they really haven't impacted information security practices.