Musicoin seems to be a system to extract micropayments from end-users instead of buying songs. The system described here seems to be about tracking royalty shares from broadcastings. Totally different systems.
Only problem I can think of is that the drive may be inaccessible by other file systems. If the OS breaks down for some reason, this may make recovery of data a serious issue.
It's a well-known risk of crowdfunding and backers are warned about this risk a gazillion times. This shouldn't be shocking to anybody even remotely sane. If you're outraged by this, you should instead be outraged by the psychiatrics wards' inability to keep you locked up inside.
It did come up in a minor way: "Just because objectionable content is removed, that doesn't necessarily transform the content enough to allow this type of behavior under a fair use analysis". Essentially the court implies that censorship alone is a breach of copyright.
revision control is not proper backup, but are you aware that all modern revision control systems are atomic? A "backup" is either perfect or non-existant.
Speaking of breaking laws is perfectly fine, no matter how much others disagree with it. Actually breaking the law is not. If what you want to do would be illegal, try and change the law to make it legal but do not act it until it is so.
Assuming this site was an integral part to inciting these murders, the question is whether that is legal or not.
Nobody cares about vegans. Meat in moderation is good and necessary for a well-balanced diet. The important question is if it has the same nutritional value and if normal humans would eat it.
Yeah, I know the problem. I live in an appartment building and even though I own my appartment, I still have to let other people waltz through the same appartment building. It's total bullshit!
I just thought of something; a drone that can fly in the air and dive below water. Or how about one that has automatically composes and edits in dramatic music based on the camera view. Or a drone that can link up with another drone to create 3D video from weird perspectives. Or a drone with a built-in baloon so it can stay in the air much longer. Or... you get the drift.
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed. I can't see why the same can't be achieved using some additional tags in the audio files.
Musicoin seems to be a system to extract micropayments from end-users instead of buying songs.
The system described here seems to be about tracking royalty shares from broadcastings.
Totally different systems.
The same can be said of your body, and would probably be a greater improvement.
Because customers are willing to pay more for a flat interface than for a more usable "old" interface.
Sigh.
Patent != copyright.
Only problem I can think of is that the drive may be inaccessible by other file systems.
If the OS breaks down for some reason, this may make recovery of data a serious issue.
It's a well-known risk of crowdfunding and backers are warned about this risk a gazillion times.
This shouldn't be shocking to anybody even remotely sane.
If you're outraged by this, you should instead be outraged by the psychiatrics wards' inability to keep you locked up inside.
It did come up in a minor way: "Just because objectionable content is removed, that doesn't necessarily transform the content enough to allow this type of behavior under a fair use analysis". Essentially the court implies that censorship alone is a breach of copyright.
Mind you; on the official online store only. It's still available on actual, physical shelves.
The bubble sure does look big from inside!
It's only fastest for a short while... then they have to relaunch it again.
ba dum tss
Yeah, no IT-nerd news site is going to report on it if they just remove it all secretively.
revision control is not proper backup, but are you aware that all modern revision control systems are atomic? A "backup" is either perfect or non-existant.
Speaking of breaking laws is perfectly fine, no matter how much others disagree with it. Actually breaking the law is not.
If what you want to do would be illegal, try and change the law to make it legal but do not act it until it is so.
Assuming this site was an integral part to inciting these murders, the question is whether that is legal or not.
I.e. eating meat is necessary to not become a vegan?
I congratulate you on your straw man, straw man.
(e.g. vegetarians aren't particularly sick).
Vegetarian != vegan.
Nobody cares about vegans.
Meat in moderation is good and necessary for a well-balanced diet.
The important question is if it has the same nutritional value and if normal humans would eat it.
Trump speeches sound like Vogon poetry.
Lets just pray Disney doesn't own any of those copyrights, or we'll see another 50 years tacked on.
Yeah, I know the problem.
I live in an appartment building and even though I own my appartment, I still have to let other people waltz through the same appartment building.
It's total bullshit!
As long as your minority point of view is not a minority point of view... by all means express away!
Please apply Betteridge's Law of Headlines to this post.
If you use a DSLR to make family photos in restaurants, then yes, your phone has replaced your DSLR.
It's Trumpisms all over.
"remember the name".
"so much faster".
"a very exciting company".
"boost [...] into the big time, for real".
Is this the new marketing? Written for people you have to spell things out for?
Regardless of whether or not there were good reasons...
"Of those requests, only one offered a justification that was not boilerplate."
...is not justifiable. If there are good reasons; specify them in the request.
Ideas are a dime a dozen.
I just thought of something; a drone that can fly in the air and dive below water. Or how about one that has automatically composes and edits in dramatic music based on the camera view. Or a drone that can link up with another drone to create 3D video from weird perspectives. Or a drone with a built-in baloon so it can stay in the air much longer. Or... you get the drift.