Freedom isn't synonymous with having things the way you want them; you're right, though: it isn't synonymous with democracy either. There is a difference, however, between advocating non-Western ideas of freedom, and openly advocating that governments be more repressive.
You've clearly never read the Christian Science monitor, either, as it has nothing to do with Christian Science but is in fact highly regarded for its relative objectivity and minimal bias in reporting compared to other American newspapers.
There are certainly people who profess to fight for freedom and do not, but there are also people who do not even profess to fight for freedom. People who want to re-establish the Caliphate, for example, certainly think it is a good idea, but that doesn't mean that they think it has anything to do with political freedom.
Some people fight for freedom. Some people use terror as a political tactic. Some freedom fighters use terrorism. Not all freedom fighters are terrorists. Not all terrorists are freedom fighters. Claiming that the two terms simply carry different connotations for the same meaning is not insightful.
Actually, chiropractors who focus on actually helping patients are "quacks" from the perspective of mainstream chiropractic, which believes that all disease can be cured by fixing subluxations. The quacks run the show, and the people abusing it are using good information and doing hard work.
It doesn't seem very likely that a person would have six functional fingers. It's very possible that a six-fingered person wouldn't even have five fingers as functional as a normal person.
The fact that it's hard to write good software is irrelevant if you hire a bunch of ex-convicts who don't even try to create a half-decent system that a small business might trust.
I can't tell the difference between jeans from Tommy Hilfiger and Old Navy, yet plenty of people buy the former despite the price sometimes being several times as much.
But that would only tell us one way that life might form: in a test tube in some nanotech-era laboratory
Still, it could be something like an incredibly precisely-controlled Miller-Urey experiment, rather than an direct fabrication of life (though that could very well be harder to do).
While we may never know, I do think this is a different situation. We can't really recreate the conditions under which language initially developed, but no doubt we will eventually be able to synthesize multicellular life.
Censorship is censorship. Non-censorship is not censorship. I mean, a rose is a rose, but a chair isn't a rose. Ignoring people is not censorship. Non-violent action taken by private citizens is not censorship.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.google.com/jobs/britney.html
Freedom isn't synonymous with having things the way you want them; you're right, though: it isn't synonymous with democracy either. There is a difference, however, between advocating non-Western ideas of freedom, and openly advocating that governments be more repressive.
Are any of you cattle ranchers or IT professionals? What kind of a question is that? Have you ever heard of Daniel David Palmer?
If you want to go with facts, you might consider giving the scientific method more credence than intuition, pseudoscience, and anecdotal evidence.
Technically, it's 15 million kelvins, but that's being really pedantic. See for yourself, though.
You've clearly never read the Christian Science monitor, either, as it has nothing to do with Christian Science but is in fact highly regarded for its relative objectivity and minimal bias in reporting compared to other American newspapers.
There are certainly people who profess to fight for freedom and do not, but there are also people who do not even profess to fight for freedom. People who want to re-establish the Caliphate, for example, certainly think it is a good idea, but that doesn't mean that they think it has anything to do with political freedom.
Some people fight for freedom. Some people use terror as a political tactic. Some freedom fighters use terrorism. Not all freedom fighters are terrorists. Not all terrorists are freedom fighters. Claiming that the two terms simply carry different connotations for the same meaning is not insightful.
Actually, chiropractors who focus on actually helping patients are "quacks" from the perspective of mainstream chiropractic, which believes that all disease can be cured by fixing subluxations. The quacks run the show, and the people abusing it are using good information and doing hard work.
It doesn't seem very likely that a person would have six functional fingers. It's very possible that a six-fingered person wouldn't even have five fingers as functional as a normal person.
The fact that it's hard to write good software is irrelevant if you hire a bunch of ex-convicts who don't even try to create a half-decent system that a small business might trust.
I can't tell the difference between jeans from Tommy Hilfiger and Old Navy, yet plenty of people buy the former despite the price sometimes being several times as much.
From a sales perspective, wouldn't the holiday season be a good time to release a product like this?
username delivers
Roland Piquepaille no longer links to his blog, however, but directly to the stories. What exactly is the problem now?
There are actually congressmen who support Israel for this very reason, scary as that is.
Still, it could be something like an incredibly precisely-controlled Miller-Urey experiment, rather than an direct fabrication of life (though that could very well be harder to do).
While we may never know, I do think this is a different situation. We can't really recreate the conditions under which language initially developed, but no doubt we will eventually be able to synthesize multicellular life.
AAA world class game made by an amazing team? Well, that's a relief--at least they aren't putting out mediocre games!
Why would a language use a sauna? Does Finnish even have skin? I don't think that English does.
No.
Hopefully you're at least a better singer than Alanis Morisette.
I must congratulate your sir, as I am entirely unable to discern whether your post was a stroke of genius or of stupidity.
Censorship is censorship. Non-censorship is not censorship. I mean, a rose is a rose, but a chair isn't a rose. Ignoring people is not censorship. Non-violent action taken by private citizens is not censorship.
It is at least as absurd as the notion that human beings can occupy antipodal points on the Earth.
That's pretty self-evident from your post.