you absolutely do not need any paid component to do notifications. actually, one of the biggest things about zabbix is that it's true opensource - no "open core" or other bullshit, it's all open source. of course, anybody is free to put out some proprietary application, but anything zabbix team does is opensource.
as for notifications, you can do email, sms, jabber/xmpp and eztexting using the built-in methods, and you can easily extend this without paying for any application
spam would be your problem as well, as it would make many pages/sites unusable. while i do find some captchas annoying, i find spammers a thousand times more annoying. i wish them painful death, maybe by suffocating in sleep and waking up too late. or something.
in latvian the surname of that stupid fucked up bitch sounds somewhat similar to "the one who pees". the ignorant censorship promoting always-peeing shithead:)
fhew. i'm not used to throwing that many curse words in, i should practice. a target is available:>
i was mostly catching on the phrase "But they do need to live". currently we are making and enforcing really insane limits (both time and scope) that are actually damaging to the society as a whole, just because a couple of professions "need to live". we do not offer the same level of insane protection to recipes or dress designs. it would be great to break up cartels that control culture, but they have grown too powerful...
these laws make nearly everybody a criminal. who has not downloaded at least one song nowadays ? played something in a party - public performance.
I am not saying that every author needs to live like them. But they do need to live.
sure. just that society should not guarantee them income. go do something else... excessive ownership and milking of ideas (which are based off other ideas) is not helping either (that being said, i'd be ok with limited copyright. i don't know... 5 years ? 10 years ?)
whenever somebody on slashdot posts about it being usa-centric site, i see an image of an overweight white guy in a trailerpark:) i know, i know, it's not true. but that's what we learn from your movies.
(coincidentally, i'm in florida right now. not many trailerparks, but some drivers and cars in western everglades are interesting:) )
One innocent person behind bars is 1 life diminished (but not extinguished).
a fucked up mind you have there - nothing personal:) it is life extinguished, maybe even worse - a decent person is likely to turn into a hardened criminal. and with a decent justification, too. a great injustice...
european here, i have only glanced at bits and pieces of this mess, mostly from slashdot-linked articles.
1. Why is everyone so upset that evidence about Martin's background that Zimmerman couldn't have known was kept out of court? It seems like since he couldn't have known, it didn't affect the situation at hand and therefore shouldn't be considered. But I might be missing something about why the victim's background is relevant in any case where the murder isn't premeditated.
apparently, various parties tried to portray martin as an innocent, weak kid. as such, evidence that he was nothing but such (including street fights, involvement with illegal guns etc) is highly relevant
2. At what point does getting out of your car and pursuing somebody become an aggressive act?
never ? it might be annoying, impolite... but never aggressive. how do you "follow aggressively" ? any act of aggression is separate from following.
3. The stand your ground law was mentioned several times throughout this case, although it doesn't seem to have directly caused the not guilty verdict. What I'm wondering is why that law didn't give Martin the right to stand his ground when Zimmerman pursued him?
you mean, standing his ground when somebody follows him ? i think you have misunderstood that thingie:) (see above about following being lots of things but not an aggression)
everything seems to open with Zimmerman being justified following him because he was a young black male. TLDR? Explain why this verdict isn't just racist without coming off as racist yourself.
wtf... i've been mostly reading plain text on this issue, and for quite some time did not even know races/skin colours etc of both men. i haven't seen any video, and i can't recall seeing pictures, although i probably did see them, as i recall imaging zimmerman as a rather (sorry) dorky looking person. this crying wolf seems like reverse racism - oh yes, i'm accusing you of being a racist, as you grab to race as your only exit from the argument:)
(also, isn't zimmerman himself not -really-white-man ? i might be fuzzy on this, as i haven't paid attention to races of parties that much...)
but... that's so wrong. lumping interest in prepubescent children in the same group as interest in 17 year old girls ? that must be a mental illness of it's own...
another anonymous coward post, praising windows on phones, and sounding soooo badly hurt about people not liking it. it probably is fashionable to hate ms in phone shops by that logic:)
thanks for mentioning this - there are too many evil and stupid people crying out "think of the children" and throwing around 'paedophilia'... when it's totally wrong.
for those who have missed it, paedophilia is being sexually attracted to prepubescent humans. for example, that's small girls who haven't even show a sign of breasts appearing (not sure about boys... boy choirs might fit, as they want boys with "undamaged" voices).
so 14 is at least a couple of years too late in most cases...
Slashdot Mirror
you absolutely do not need any paid component to do notifications. actually, one of the biggest things about zabbix is that it's true opensource - no "open core" or other bullshit, it's all open source. of course, anybody is free to put out some proprietary application, but anything zabbix team does is opensource.
as for notifications, you can do email, sms, jabber/xmpp and eztexting using the built-in methods, and you can easily extend this without paying for any application
oh, forgot, there's also built-in support for a commercial messaging provider in north america, eztexting
to expand on this, zabbix has built-in email, gsm modem and jabber/xmpp support. of course, it can just run your script to do all kind of magic, too :)
disclaimer - i'm working on zabbix for a few years now :)
spam would be your problem as well, as it would make many pages/sites unusable. while i do find some captchas annoying, i find spammers a thousand times more annoying. i wish them painful death, maybe by suffocating in sleep and waking up too late. or something.
well, they do gain a minor credit for turning down "counterfeiting and even copyright infringement" requests :)
in latvian the surname of that stupid fucked up bitch sounds somewhat similar to "the one who pees". :)
the ignorant censorship promoting always-peeing shithead
fhew. i'm not used to throwing that many curse words in, i should practice. a target is available :>
i was mostly catching on the phrase "But they do need to live". currently we are making and enforcing really insane limits (both time and scope) that are actually damaging to the society as a whole, just because a couple of professions "need to live".
we do not offer the same level of insane protection to recipes or dress designs. it would be great to break up cartels that control culture, but they have grown too powerful...
these laws make nearly everybody a criminal. who has not downloaded at least one song nowadays ? played something in a party - public performance.
I am not saying that every author needs to live like them. But they do need to live.
sure. just that society should not guarantee them income. go do something else...
excessive ownership and milking of ideas (which are based off other ideas) is not helping either (that being said, i'd be ok with limited copyright. i don't know... 5 years ? 10 years ?)
Except that to earn a living then they would have to write a new song every day.
in order to get paid, an architect would have to design buildings constantly instead of getting royalties for 70 years after their death... er, wait.
actually, most countries that were not formed by immigrants have a term like that. the usage might be higher or lower, but it's there.
it's good the wrong lizard did not get in
whenever somebody on slashdot posts about it being usa-centric site, i see an image of an overweight white guy in a trailerpark :)
i know, i know, it's not true. but that's what we learn from your movies.
(coincidentally, i'm in florida right now. not many trailerparks, but some drivers and cars in western everglades are interesting :) )
heh. i'm reading that book right now. are you from nsa ?
One innocent person behind bars is 1 life diminished (but not extinguished).
a fucked up mind you have there - nothing personal :)
it is life extinguished, maybe even worse - a decent person is likely to turn into a hardened criminal. and with a decent justification, too. a great injustice...
european here, i have only glanced at bits and pieces of this mess, mostly from slashdot-linked articles.
1. Why is everyone so upset that evidence about Martin's background that Zimmerman couldn't have known was kept out of court? It seems like since he couldn't have known, it didn't affect the situation at hand and therefore shouldn't be considered. But I might be missing something about why the victim's background is relevant in any case where the murder isn't premeditated.
apparently, various parties tried to portray martin as an innocent, weak kid. as such, evidence that he was nothing but such (including street fights, involvement with illegal guns etc) is highly relevant
2. At what point does getting out of your car and pursuing somebody become an aggressive act?
never ? it might be annoying, impolite... but never aggressive. how do you "follow aggressively" ? any act of aggression is separate from following.
3. The stand your ground law was mentioned several times throughout this case, although it doesn't seem to have directly caused the not guilty verdict. What I'm wondering is why that law didn't give Martin the right to stand his ground when Zimmerman pursued him?
you mean, standing his ground when somebody follows him ? i think you have misunderstood that thingie :)
(see above about following being lots of things but not an aggression)
everything seems to open with Zimmerman being justified following him because he was a young black male.
TLDR? Explain why this verdict isn't just racist without coming off as racist yourself.
wtf... i've been mostly reading plain text on this issue, and for quite some time did not even know races/skin colours etc of both men. i haven't seen any video, and i can't recall seeing pictures, although i probably did see them, as i recall imaging zimmerman as a rather (sorry) dorky looking person. this crying wolf seems like reverse racism - oh yes, i'm accusing you of being a racist, as you grab to race as your only exit from the argument :)
(also, isn't zimmerman himself not -really-white-man ? i might be fuzzy on this, as i haven't paid attention to races of parties that much...)
Each one of those 3 actions is proscribed by neighborhood watch guides
they're not laws, though, thus they can't impact the decision, can they ?
thanks for mentioning that, hadn't spotted it.
but... that's so wrong. lumping interest in prepubescent children in the same group as interest in 17 year old girls ? that must be a mental illness of it's own...
another anonymous coward post, praising windows on phones, and sounding soooo badly hurt about people not liking it. it probably is fashionable to hate ms in phone shops by that logic :)
maybe the ac you replied to is elop :)
wouldn't "want the nsa clearance" suggest that the is s single clearance to obtain only ?
wikileaks might accept such a collection...
oh fuck it, it was a simple joke, a reasonably funny and lighthearted one. and very, very on topic. actually... i think i have spotted another fed ;)
(disclaimer : 'fed' from the usa, not from any other federative composition in the world; this statement is not meant to shock residents of the usa)
thanks for mentioning this - there are too many evil and stupid people crying out "think of the children" and throwing around 'paedophilia'... when it's totally wrong.
for those who have missed it, paedophilia is being sexually attracted to prepubescent humans. for example, that's small girls who haven't even show a sign of breasts appearing (not sure about boys... boy choirs might fit, as they want boys with "undamaged" voices).
so 14 is at least a couple of years too late in most cases...
you cut off the rest of the sentence, then commented on two words ? well, ac did put it in more detail for you...
a lot, unless you say those movies are not only silent, but also have no video