So now a person can vote only once. Whatever they voted, that is their vote. Does not matter if they went on a bus to wherever or went to the closest place they can walk to. One person, one vote.
The problem in the US is not that. It is that they want to exclude as many people to vote as possible. In Belgium they solved this differently. Each person MUST vote and each person also MUST have an ID. There are social solutions for poor people so that having to pay fo an ID every 5 years is not really an issue.
It also means you do not need to register at any party, as you are registered by default.
Disclaimer: You are not forced to vote. You are forced to show up. Nobody will know if or what you voted. (Or that used to be the case. Now Electronic Voting makes it an issue like everywhere else)
People I work with answer email as a job. They answer 50-100 emails per day. Their job description is basically "answer emails". So the only thing they do is answering emails.
They do not even get to those 5 hours.
What They do is check an email for about 20 seconds and then answer it. So that is roughly 30 minutes checking email. And these are profesional emailers (or whatever you call them).
So not sure what thet mean by "checking your email". And if you mean outside of work: the majority of people does not use email anymore. They use Watsapp or Facebook or Google+ (OK, bit of a strech) to contact other people.
So I do think that 'checking email' does not mean to them that I think it means. To me 'Checking email' is to see if there are emails and open an email so that it goes from unread to read'. It does not mean reading, replying, doing something else while the email is open or anything else. It also does not include the time my server is polling for email in the bacjkground.
So 5 hours per day on avreage? Unpossible (unless you are a consultant, but that has more to do with hollywood accounting than anything else)
If you see waiters. Some are good and some are bad. A good one will look around so he does not need to walk rwice. A bad ome thinks that if he does not look, he will work less as he did not see it, resulting in walking twice, as it needs to be done anyway.
So the fire department should get free access? All for that. Who will pay the bill?
What other things should they not pay for? Water? Food for their firefighters? Their trucks? Uniforms? Because if they do not need to pay the 2USD per month as was proposed to them, why stop there?
Iit has to do with the fire department not paying the 2USD per month to get complete unlimited data and ignoring the warning they got. It has zilch to do with Net Meutrality, BLM, ebonics, Trump or any other word you think is in fashion right now.
Just because you do a great thing does not mean you get a free ride. Next they are upset they need to pay for all other goods they use.
I understand if they are unable to hack a system, or not even able to find it, but unable to target it? Blindfold me and I am able to target (and miss) a pinata.
No, theyshould say "fuck off and come back with a warrent." I have seen police escorted of the premises, because they did not have a seach warrent. Bossman just told them he would see that the logfiles would be ready if they came back with a warrent and only then they would be handed over.
I have also seen, although nit copied, a letter from a judge to the local MAFIAA to basucaly fuck off if no miney was involved. It would be seen as contempt of the legal branch. So I copy and share and as long as I do not make any profit, I am good.
The general idea I got that the majority of postings here said that it would break, only that nobody knew when. So I would like to see who these hundreds of users are that claimed it and I see AC as one user. That said, saying it will go up is a standard thing to say when you want to sell.
The fact that they could not collect data from you does not mean it is not happening and it is not wrong. Basically you are blaming the rape victim for asking for it by dressing sexy.
In Belgium most have cable TV. Cable providers also will have Internet. Some people (mostly non-Belgians*) will have satelite, because then they have plenty of shows in their language. Now there are also Internet providers that provide TV stations.
One trick to do is to say to your cable provider. People on the phone are trained to do retention, so you are in a great negotiation position. That does not mean cheaper cable, it can mean a year of free cable. And then you just call them again next year, if you do not mind being a cheat.
I do not have any TV as I do not care for it. I also do not pay the phone company directly. Last mile DSL I pay to my provider.
As an extra, I pay now 35 EUR for 100/40 https://www.edpnet.be/en/home/... and by looking at it I am reminded taht I have a fixed number. Cmpletely forgot about that. No idea what it is and I do not even have a fixed phone since 10 years or so.
And to be honest, it is plenty fast. I download faster via torrent than I can watch a HD movie or TV show.
(*) Yes, this includes Arab stations, but also what you will see in e.g. ther Irish Pub where they will have the Hurling(**) on TV. Second best sport (after Autralian Rules Footbal) (**) Hurling is where they thought "Rugby is nice, but why not give them a stick?"
So how much DID they think was OK. I tried to read the article but got: Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries.
So now you know that the LA Times is selling your data and does not care for your privacy. You are welcome.
I get that some people would need a high quality camera on their phone. The majority is that most people will take pictures of their phone of their cat, their lunch and their kids and those images will be seen on an other phone for 3 seconds. (Yes I know, person who is replying, that you are the exception)
If you just point and shoot and then send it, the cheap phones have a good enough quality. If you seriously start manipulating the images you take, higher quality is indeed a must. But then you will have the phone as a second or third camera next to the DSLR you already own.
If it is the place you work, it is not your email. So I would not care what happens with it. That does not even mean that they use Gmail. And if if they did, who cares?
And the governement agency that has a google account: tell them to run their own servers (Oh, wait. That is how POTUS got power). Yes, still not your email, so not your problem. It is the agencies problem. You could advice them that archiving depending on a single company is a bad idea, especial when they are reading your mails. It is up to them to change that policy or not. In any case it becomes their problem if things go wrong (that you might be asked to clean.)
If where I work decides to run their email via telnet without a login and for all to see, or to delete each email after 20 seconds, read or not, I would seriously doubt their decision, explain my concerns (verbal and in writing) but it would be their problem to follow up on it. And at this moment I am in a situation what they are doing with email is utterly stupid and will cost them a lot of money in the long run.
Why wait? You are on/. You will have the technical lnowlwdge to have your own domain and can find a cheap provider for your email, including your own server.
So he bought something that did not fullfill his wishes and he was upset. (Hey, I did the same. I cut the middleman and do not buy the DVD or BlueRay)
Just because you want something does not mean you are able to buy it. There is no law that says that anybody needs to make something that you desire.
I want a lot of things I am not able to buye, because nobody is selling them. Apparently there is no market for it.
I could buy a book, type it in a computer and print it out, because I wanted it in a diffrent font. Sad that I had to technically break the law to get something I owned into a format I wanted it in.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps look how they do it in the largest democracy in the world, India.
The thing you need to look at is 'one person, one vote' You do not want them to vote twice.
You get some ink that can not be removed for at leats two days.
So now a person can vote only once. Whatever they voted, that is their vote. Does not matter if they went on a bus to wherever or went to the closest place they can walk to. One person, one vote.
The problem in the US is not that. It is that they want to exclude as many people to vote as possible. In Belgium they solved this differently. Each person MUST vote and each person also MUST have an ID. There are social solutions for poor people so that having to pay fo an ID every 5 years is not really an issue.
It also means you do not need to register at any party, as you are registered by default.
Disclaimer: You are not forced to vote. You are forced to show up. Nobody will know if or what you voted. (Or that used to be the case. Now Electronic Voting makes it an issue like everywhere else)
Demo-cat. It somehow sound even better without the R.
People I work with answer email as a job. They answer 50-100 emails per day. Their job description is basically "answer emails". So the only thing they do is answering emails.
They do not even get to those 5 hours.
What They do is check an email for about 20 seconds and then answer it. So that is roughly 30 minutes checking email. And these are profesional emailers (or whatever you call them).
So not sure what thet mean by "checking your email". And if you mean outside of work: the majority of people does not use email anymore. They use Watsapp or Facebook or Google+ (OK, bit of a strech) to contact other people.
So I do think that 'checking email' does not mean to them that I think it means. To me 'Checking email' is to see if there are emails and open an email so that it goes from unread to read'. It does not mean reading, replying, doing something else while the email is open or anything else.
It also does not include the time my server is polling for email in the bacjkground.
So 5 hours per day on avreage? Unpossible (unless you are a consultant, but that has more to do with hollywood accounting than anything else)
I am bot lazy. I am efficient with my energy.
If you see waiters. Some are good and some are bad. A good one will look around so he does not need to walk rwice. A bad ome thinks that if he does not look, he will work less as he did not see it, resulting in walking twice, as it needs to be done anyway.
So the fire department should get free access? All for that. Who will pay the bill?
What other things should they not pay for? Water? Food for their firefighters? Their trucks? Uniforms? Because if they do not need to pay the 2USD per month as was proposed to them, why stop there?
Iit has to do with the fire department not paying the 2USD per month to get complete unlimited data and ignoring the warning they got.
It has zilch to do with Net Meutrality, BLM, ebonics, Trump or any other word you think is in fashion right now.
Just because you do a great thing does not mean you get a free ride. Next they are upset they need to pay for all other goods they use.
I understand if they are unable to hack a system, or not even able to find it, but unable to target it?
Blindfold me and I am able to target (and miss) a pinata.
No, theyshould say "fuck off and come back with a warrent." I have seen police escorted of the premises, because they did not have a seach warrent.
Bossman just told them he would see that the logfiles would be ready if they came back with a warrent and only then they would be handed over.
I have also seen, although nit copied, a letter from a judge to the local MAFIAA to basucaly fuck off if no miney was involved. It would be seen as contempt of the legal branch. So I copy and share and as long as I do not make any profit, I am good.
All thus is in Belgium.
The general idea I got that the majority of postings here said that it would break, only that nobody knew when.
So I would like to see who these hundreds of users are that claimed it and I see AC as one user.
That said, saying it will go up is a standard thing to say when you want to sell.
Risk takers take risk. News at 11.
The fact that they could not collect data from you does not mean it is not happening and it is not wrong. Basically you are blaming the rape victim for asking for it by dressing sexy.
You are aware that is how the stockmarkets work, right? And I do mean the stock market, not shares themselves.
Then either they make a huge warning label that when off youmight die and they arenot responsible, or you do not make it possible to turn off.
You can not say it is off when it is not. That is called lying.
If we are dumb, then God is dumb (and a little bit ugly on the side) -- Frank Zappa
I do not get it, but I like to go there. I have a spacesuit and am willing to travel.
In Belgium most have cable TV. Cable providers also will have Internet. Some people (mostly non-Belgians*) will have satelite, because then they have plenty of shows in their language. Now there are also Internet providers that provide TV stations.
One trick to do is to say to your cable provider. People on the phone are trained to do retention, so you are in a great negotiation position. That does not mean cheaper cable, it can mean a year of free cable. And then you just call them again next year, if you do not mind being a cheat.
I do not have any TV as I do not care for it. I also do not pay the phone company directly. Last mile DSL I pay to my provider.
As an extra, I pay now 35 EUR for 100/40 https://www.edpnet.be/en/home/... and by looking at it I am reminded taht I have a fixed number. Cmpletely forgot about that. No idea what it is and I do not even have a fixed phone since 10 years or so.
And to be honest, it is plenty fast. I download faster via torrent than I can watch a HD movie or TV show.
(*) Yes, this includes Arab stations, but also what you will see in e.g. ther Irish Pub where they will have the Hurling(**) on TV. Second best sport (after Autralian Rules Footbal)
(**) Hurling is where they thought "Rugby is nice, but why not give them a stick?"
So how much DID they think was OK. I tried to read the article but got:
Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries.
So now you know that the LA Times is selling your data and does not care for your privacy.
You are welcome.
Yes.
Pfft. I made one of a coax cable and just put one end in my TV and the other in the wall.
You still use cash. How quaint.
And those 15 jobs saw to it that 1500 other people lost theirs in mom and pop shops. But hey, at least I got my TV 70USD cheaper, right?
I get that some people would need a high quality camera on their phone. The majority is that most people will take pictures of their phone of their cat, their lunch and their kids and those images will be seen on an other phone for 3 seconds.
(Yes I know, person who is replying, that you are the exception)
If you just point and shoot and then send it, the cheap phones have a good enough quality. If you seriously start manipulating the images you take, higher quality is indeed a must. But then you will have the phone as a second or third camera next to the DSLR you already own.
If it is the place you work, it is not your email. So I would not care what happens with it. That does not even mean that they use Gmail. And if if they did, who cares?
And the governement agency that has a google account: tell them to run their own servers (Oh, wait. That is how POTUS got power).
Yes, still not your email, so not your problem. It is the agencies problem. You could advice them that archiving depending on a single company is a bad idea, especial when they are reading your mails. It is up to them to change that policy or not.
In any case it becomes their problem if things go wrong (that you might be asked to clean.)
If where I work decides to run their email via telnet without a login and for all to see, or to delete each email after 20 seconds, read or not, I would seriously doubt their decision, explain my concerns (verbal and in writing) but it would be their problem to follow up on it. And at this moment I am in a situation what they are doing with email is utterly stupid and will cost them a lot of money in the long run.
Why wait? You are on /. You will have the technical lnowlwdge to have your own domain and can find a cheap provider for your email, including your own server.
So he bought something that did not fullfill his wishes and he was upset. (Hey, I did the same. I cut the middleman and do not buy the DVD or BlueRay)
Just because you want something does not mean you are able to buy it. There is no law that says that anybody needs to make something that you desire.
I want a lot of things I am not able to buye, because nobody is selling them. Apparently there is no market for it.
I could buy a book, type it in a computer and print it out, because I wanted it in a diffrent font. Sad that I had to technically break the law to get something I owned into a format I wanted it in.