If you would type 250 characters per minute instead of 500, how much slower would you be? Ot if you where able to type 1000 per minute, how much faster would you me?
There are not that many places where typing speed is the limiting factor. e.g. what I am typing now is not all fullout typing. I stop, reread, re-thing, delete and rewrite. Perhaps 10% of the time is used for actual typing. When I look at other things, this becomes even less.
Processing what I need to type is much more than just the typing. The thinking takes most of the time. (Should have timed how log this took to type, with the whole process, not just the typing.)
1) Just because something is used for something illegal does not mean it should be made illegal to use. (bittorrent) 2) I am sure they very well know how it is funded 3) Almost nobody voted for Trump, they voted against Clinton. And even so, just because he wanted Trump to win does not mean he can't be critical of what he does.
No, they don't. At least not where I am. Disclaimer: I live in Belgium.
Here every company with 50 or more employees has to have a union representative. So EVERY company with more that 50 people is a union company. That are however the companies that have representation at the company.
That does not mean if you work in such a company that you must join a union or if you do not work in such a company that you can't join a union. The union can be joined from when you start working or are able to legally work. So 18 at least, perhaps even 16, but that I do not know.
You can also join almost any union that you desire. Only some are limited to specific companies. Those for me are more like a guild that a union.
The difference for me is that a union looks after the people and the guild looks after the jobs.
Now if they can show up and do nothing, you have a situation that was created by people who where clueless. Just as clueless as the people who let others work for 64 hours and only pay 32.
I am a union member, but that is irrelevant to where I work, what I do or how my evaluations goes. If I am a slacker, I get fired, regardless if I am in a union or not or if I work in a company where there is a representation or not.
The thing that the unions do is even the playing field and see that I am not alone against a huge company. It means I work my hours and not more. It means they can't ask me to do overtime, even if they pay for it, just like that. OTOH it also means you can't do overtime and think you are a better person if you do not ask money for it.
Yes, some people will do that. Yes, some companies will ask that. And if they get found out, the company will pay a lot extra,
So no, it is not unions that caused it. It was weak management that gave in to it every and each demand, making it trip over to the other wrong side.
And that is why companies should not have the right to decide those things. And I do not care if people mock me for having been unemployed for 2 years and getting money from the state.
I do no even care if the company wanted to me to have it or not, because they knew I would get it. The ONLY way they could prevent it would be to fire me because of "urgent reasons" and that would be e.g., theft, violence or not coming to work for a longer period without a legal excuse.
If they would do that with a few people too many, then it would most likely be clear that it was not due to a legal reason and they would pay through their nose. And it does not even matter if I am in a union or not as I can (and have) joined a union AFTER I got fired and then let them sort it out if there would have been issues.
Whenever I hear about the legal work situation in the US I must think about my history lessons from when they talked about early 1900 when the unions in Europe started to get more power because the workers where abused.
Understand that there is a difference between a union as they exist in Europe and the Guilds that are called unions in the US.
About that 2 period of unemployment: Yes, I have looked and was overqualified all the time. I have also seen people thrown out of unemployment benefits, because they where abusing the system. (20 year old carpenter who said he could not get a job, but refused to work in a factory)
The thing we know is that the NSA and Israel do not have access to the code. We know that Russia tried to get into Kasperski and that means they do not work with them. We know that the NSA warns against them.
To me all this tells me they are the safest bet for security of any of the anti-virus companies.
My guess is that the NSA has back doors in the rest and if they have them, the rest has as well. So even IF the Russians have hacked them, they are still more secure than any other AV program who must be assumed to have been hacked by everybody;
How do you know how much it will cost before you go to the checkout? Where I live there will be prices in that aisles. So the price is known. There are several ways to solve this and all will cost extra manpower. 1) You sticker rice everything 2) You write down a long list with all items and put that at each checkout 3) You do checkouts per isle and have people memorize and/or look up the prices.
I am sure there will be better methods, but it is possible. If a store is willing to do it will depend from store to store. I know Cloud 9 Stores will be open.
I watch movies based on the number of torrent seeders. But seriously : Never cared what others have to say about it. I basically go by movie title and the less I know about it, the more I like it. I do not even like to know the genre. I find that that way I get much more involved in the story.
But that is also how I order food. If I do not know it, I order it and I do not want an explanation of what it is before.
With movies it is now almost not possible to not know after 30 seconds what the movie is about and how the end will be in the majority of the cases. Sometimes that is not a bad thing (LotR), but most of times it sucks the surprise out of it.
The Matric I saw when all I heard was that it was and SF movie. So I discovered what it was about while I watched it. Great experience.
So no, I never look at what others have to say about it. Not on Rotten Tomatoes. Not on any other site.
The issue you talk about has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with accountability Any interaction with a police person could be used as an abuse later. That will happen with or without sex. A favorite I see is that they come by and ask stores to sponsor their annual party. Nothing will happen if you do not sponsor, but nobody wants to be the one local store that didn't.
Sure a police office might abuse his power and have sex with a person, just like a teacher can or a Hollywood director. But if there is accountability, there is less of on issue.
The larger risk is not the abuse of power to get sex, but the abuse of sex to get power. "Look the other way, or these pictures will be made public." is a much larger risk. If it is legal the implications would be far less serious.
This also goes for use of e.g. drugs.
There will always be imbalance of power, be it with a police officer, a manager, a parent or anything else. That is why we have laws: to hold those who abuse it to be held accountable.
The purpose of having a signed and witnessed will is proof that it was authored or approved by the individual.
That does not mean that is a must. It wil make things a LOT easier, but that is about it from a legal point of view.
A will is nothing more than a type of contract. First there is the general law that will determine what is allowed and what not. e.g. in some countries it is not possible to exclude the kids. The will from my parents had that everything would go the the longst living person and myself and my sister would get nothing. When the second parent would die, we would get 50/50. This was their will and this is how they and we wanted it. When my mother died, we still needed to refuse it, because it was not allowed, even though all 4 of us agreed with it.
Next is the last will that was made. It is obviously much easier to prove if the where witnesses. My parents did that with a notary, so there is an official track, but you could write it on a postcard and put it in a box. It will be just easier to be overlooked and you might forget some things to write into the will that would make it less clear. Say you have three sons and you do not want son number two to get anything (and that is legal where you live) saying my oldest and my youngest son get 45% and the rest goes to the EFF. If they both die and the will soes not change, son number 2 is both the oldest AND the youngest and gets everything. If the sons are all identified correctly, the money will go to the kids/wife of the oldest and youngest son and son 2 and his horrible kids get nothing.
So the thing is that having it done by a notary (what most people do in Belgium) will make issues later a lot less throublesome. Most issues come from writing one that is not according to the law or not changed when the situation changes. e. g. A get 10.000 B gets 10.000 and C gets the rest. And there is only 10.000 left instead of 100.000 as was thought before.
How is that different to an unsent letter? He crated it, it is valid. If you write a will, there is no obligation to send it to anybody. Most people in Belgium will go through a notary, but tere is no law that demands it. You could even go to a notary, go outside and write a new one that you hide behind a painting.
The last version of what you wrote is the valid one. Not the last one that you gave to somebody else. You could write it on a banana peel and it would be valid.
The hard part here might have been to determine if it was a will or a draft of a will. All you need to do is write e.g. "After my death, all must go to....". Obviously the more details you put in, the better. "My lovely daughter" might be an issue if you do not name her. "My wife" can be an issue if you remarry. So most goes into determine who the person is. And do not go too much into detail "My son Peter, who live at New Av 123 in..." will exclude him when he moves.
So the rule of thumb is "The latest version is the valid one."
So what he said was correct. People want free stuff, be it as in beer or as in speech or as in both. People who don't want DRM and do want privacy still want free (as in speech) stuff.
What about when they do an intro scene in a public place. They do not always hide the faces of non-actors. Does that mean you might be tagged as being in a Porn movie?
If it is breached, that means that they are not working together with them. It means it NEEDS to be breached to be available to them.
Why are they not caught breaching the others? My guess is because they found the loophole the NSA put in there. and everybody is using that already.
It also shows that the Israelis where looking to breach it (most likely while working with/for the NSA) and that means they where not yet able to breach it either.
Of all of them, the safest bet is still them. Worst case is that only the Russians read your things. Best case is that a new version makes it that nobody has hacked them.
In Belgium they used to say "If you are young and you are not a socialist(*), you have no heart. If you are old and you are not a capitalist(**), you have no head." It seems that this is reversed now.
(*) Meaning that social things matter more than money (**) Meaning financial stability is more important
By keeping the algorithm a secret then we have effectively added a few more bits to the key.
You didn't, really.
To make it easier: it is like saying that you are more secure, because you run SSH on port 2222 instead of 22. Harder to hack does not mean it is more secure. The hill is steeper, but just as high.
Take it a step further. Go for independence, like Scotland and Catalunia.Many people seem to be in favor o those being independent, even if they do not live in Europe.
Slashdot Mirror
If you would type 250 characters per minute instead of 500, how much slower would you be? Ot if you where able to type 1000 per minute, how much faster would you me?
There are not that many places where typing speed is the limiting factor. e.g. what I am typing now is not all fullout typing. I stop, reread, re-thing, delete and rewrite. Perhaps 10% of the time is used for actual typing. When I look at other things, this becomes even less.
Processing what I need to type is much more than just the typing. The thinking takes most of the time. (Should have timed how log this took to type, with the whole process, not just the typing.)
1) Just because something is used for something illegal does not mean it should be made illegal to use. (bittorrent)
2) I am sure they very well know how it is funded
3) Almost nobody voted for Trump, they voted against Clinton. And even so, just because he wanted Trump to win does not mean he can't be critical of what he does.
No, they don't. At least not where I am. Disclaimer: I live in Belgium.
Here every company with 50 or more employees has to have a union representative. So EVERY company with more that 50 people is a union company. That are however the companies that have representation at the company.
That does not mean if you work in such a company that you must join a union or if you do not work in such a company that you can't join a union. The union can be joined from when you start working or are able to legally work. So 18 at least, perhaps even 16, but that I do not know.
You can also join almost any union that you desire. Only some are limited to specific companies. Those for me are more like a guild that a union.
The difference for me is that a union looks after the people and the guild looks after the jobs.
Now if they can show up and do nothing, you have a situation that was created by people who where clueless. Just as clueless as the people who let others work for 64 hours and only pay 32.
I am a union member, but that is irrelevant to where I work, what I do or how my evaluations goes. If I am a slacker, I get fired, regardless if I am in a union or not or if I work in a company where there is a representation or not.
The thing that the unions do is even the playing field and see that I am not alone against a huge company. It means I work my hours and not more. It means they can't ask me to do overtime, even if they pay for it, just like that. OTOH it also means you can't do overtime and think you are a better person if you do not ask money for it.
Yes, some people will do that. Yes, some companies will ask that. And if they get found out, the company will pay a lot extra,
So no, it is not unions that caused it. It was weak management that gave in to it every and each demand, making it trip over to the other wrong side.
And that is why companies should not have the right to decide those things. And I do not care if people mock me for having been unemployed for 2 years and getting money from the state.
I do no even care if the company wanted to me to have it or not, because they knew I would get it. The ONLY way they could prevent it would be to fire me because of "urgent reasons" and that would be e.g., theft, violence or not coming to work for a longer period without a legal excuse.
If they would do that with a few people too many, then it would most likely be clear that it was not due to a legal reason and they would pay through their nose. And it does not even matter if I am in a union or not as I can (and have) joined a union AFTER I got fired and then let them sort it out if there would have been issues.
Whenever I hear about the legal work situation in the US I must think about my history lessons from when they talked about early 1900 when the unions in Europe started to get more power because the workers where abused.
Understand that there is a difference between a union as they exist in Europe and the Guilds that are called unions in the US.
About that 2 period of unemployment: Yes, I have looked and was overqualified all the time. I have also seen people thrown out of unemployment benefits, because they where abusing the system. (20 year old carpenter who said he could not get a job, but refused to work in a factory)
The thing we know is that the NSA and Israel do not have access to the code. We know that Russia tried to get into Kasperski and that means they do not work with them.
We know that the NSA warns against them.
To me all this tells me they are the safest bet for security of any of the anti-virus companies.
My guess is that the NSA has back doors in the rest and if they have them, the rest has as well. So even IF the Russians have hacked them, they are still more secure than any other AV program who must be assumed to have been hacked by everybody;
How do you know how much it will cost before you go to the checkout? Where I live there will be prices in that aisles. So the price is known. There are several ways to solve this and all will cost extra manpower.
1) You sticker rice everything
2) You write down a long list with all items and put that at each checkout
3) You do checkouts per isle and have people memorize and/or look up the prices.
I am sure there will be better methods, but it is possible. If a store is willing to do it will depend from store to store. I know Cloud 9 Stores will be open.
Congratulations: you just invented countries (and politics).
I watch movies based on the number of torrent seeders.
But seriously : Never cared what others have to say about it. I basically go by movie title and the less I know about it, the more I like it. I do not even like to know the genre. I find that that way I get much more involved in the story.
But that is also how I order food. If I do not know it, I order it and I do not want an explanation of what it is before.
With movies it is now almost not possible to not know after 30 seconds what the movie is about and how the end will be in the majority of the cases. Sometimes that is not a bad thing (LotR), but most of times it sucks the surprise out of it.
The Matric I saw when all I heard was that it was and SF movie. So I discovered what it was about while I watched it. Great experience.
So no, I never look at what others have to say about it. Not on Rotten Tomatoes. Not on any other site.
The issue you talk about has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with accountability Any interaction with a police person could be used as an abuse later. That will happen with or without sex. A favorite I see is that they come by and ask stores to sponsor their annual party. Nothing will happen if you do not sponsor, but nobody wants to be the one local store that didn't.
Sure a police office might abuse his power and have sex with a person, just like a teacher can or a Hollywood director. But if there is accountability, there is less of on issue.
The larger risk is not the abuse of power to get sex, but the abuse of sex to get power. "Look the other way, or these pictures will be made public." is a much larger risk. If it is legal the implications would be far less serious.
This also goes for use of e.g. drugs.
There will always be imbalance of power, be it with a police officer, a manager, a parent or anything else. That is why we have laws: to hold those who abuse it to be held accountable.
They do ship to New Zealand and not to a country south of Germany? Weird.
Yeah, because they actually delete your data and will never your your dat, even if you never where on the site.
That was an example of sarcasm.
That does not mean that is a must. It wil make things a LOT easier, but that is about it from a legal point of view.
A will is nothing more than a type of contract.
First there is the general law that will determine what is allowed and what not. e.g. in some countries it is not possible to exclude the kids. The will from my parents had that everything would go the the longst living person and myself and my sister would get nothing. When the second parent would die, we would get 50/50. This was their will and this is how they and we wanted it. When my mother died, we still needed to refuse it, because it was not allowed, even though all 4 of us agreed with it.
Next is the last will that was made. It is obviously much easier to prove if the where witnesses. My parents did that with a notary, so there is an official track, but you could write it on a postcard and put it in a box. It will be just easier to be overlooked and you might forget some things to write into the will that would make it less clear. Say you have three sons and you do not want son number two to get anything (and that is legal where you live) saying my oldest and my youngest son get 45% and the rest goes to the EFF. If they both die and the will soes not change, son number 2 is both the oldest AND the youngest and gets everything.
If the sons are all identified correctly, the money will go to the kids/wife of the oldest and youngest son and son 2 and his horrible kids get nothing.
So the thing is that having it done by a notary (what most people do in Belgium) will make issues later a lot less throublesome. Most issues come from writing one that is not according to the law or not changed when the situation changes. e. g. A get 10.000 B gets 10.000 and C gets the rest. And there is only 10.000 left instead of 100.000 as was thought before.
How is that different to an unsent letter? He crated it, it is valid. If you write a will, there is no obligation to send it to anybody. Most people in Belgium will go through a notary, but tere is no law that demands it. You could even go to a notary, go outside and write a new one that you hide behind a painting.
The last version of what you wrote is the valid one. Not the last one that you gave to somebody else. You could write it on a banana peel and it would be valid.
The hard part here might have been to determine if it was a will or a draft of a will. All you need to do is write e.g. "After my death, all must go to ....". Obviously the more details you put in, the better. "My lovely daughter" might be an issue if you do not name her. "My wife" can be an issue if you remarry. So most goes into determine who the person is. And do not go too much into detail "My son Peter, who live at New Av 123 in ..." will exclude him when he moves.
So the rule of thumb is "The latest version is the valid one."
So what he said was correct. People want free stuff, be it as in beer or as in speech or as in both.
People who don't want DRM and do want privacy still want free (as in speech) stuff.
What about when they do an intro scene in a public place. They do not always hide the faces of non-actors. Does that mean you might be tagged as being in a Porn movie?
Or perhaps something to do with being a decent human being.
If it is breached, that means that they are not working together with them. It means it NEEDS to be breached to be available to them.
Why are they not caught breaching the others? My guess is because they found the loophole the NSA put in there. and everybody is using that already.
It also shows that the Israelis where looking to breach it (most likely while working with/for the NSA) and that means they where not yet able to breach it either.
Of all of them, the safest bet is still them. Worst case is that only the Russians read your things. Best case is that a new version makes it that nobody has hacked them.
FoxNews tells me that is not true.
The chances of there being two ticketing bombs on a plane are astronomical small, so I always take one with me, so we are all more secure.
Well, that was easy. I wonder if the scientists already contacted you to solve other problems.
According to Trump : Chinese.
In Belgium they used to say "If you are young and you are not a socialist(*), you have no heart. If you are old and you are not a capitalist(**), you have no head."
It seems that this is reversed now.
(*) Meaning that social things matter more than money
(**) Meaning financial stability is more important
To make it easier: it is like saying that you are more secure, because you run SSH on port 2222 instead of 22.
Harder to hack does not mean it is more secure. The hill is steeper, but just as high.
Take it a step further. Go for independence, like Scotland and Catalunia.Many people seem to be in favor o those being independent, even if they do not live in Europe.
It might be if you only need to influence some of the people some of the time.