It would just be another popularity contest and a target for astroturfing. In the end it would be no more accurate than the stories it purports to fact-check.
Can you imagine the cottage industry it would spawn? For only $9.95 we guarantee to increase the fact-rating rating of your page by 100%! Or we can reduce the rating of any page of your choice!
Fact-checking is just a method of manipulation. It lulls the unwary into not thinking for themselves, and it insults everyone's intelligence. We need less punditry, not more.
If anyone does implement this, I hope they also add a button to disable or hide it, because it would be very annoying.
STOP it? Obama promised transparency, which (in hindsight) it turns out means transparency of our formerly-private communications... not of the government.
Who owns the restaurant? Do they work for free too? Seems like a scheme for the rich "haves" to employ an unlimited pool of poor "have-nots" for free, allowing them to get richer while the poor stay poor on a fixed income.
What is going to entice those restaurant workers to actually work? If they can get their UBI check only in exchange for work, then it's not UBI, it's communism: everyone works for the government and the government contracts out its workforce to capitalist owners, or assigns them as desired. But that can't be, as the whole premise of UBI is that there are not enough jobs to go around; the purpose of UBI is to provide for those that cannot work. So work becomes voluntary as people compete for the privilege of working. But who is going to volunteer to do the dirty jobs?
Seems like you want UBI + wages. You get your UBI automatically just because you're alive, but workers still get paid wages. Get fired, no wages. That incentivizes work, spreads the wealth out from the owners who don't get to just keep all the profits for free, while still supporting those who are unable to work. Only the best will be employed, and wages will mean more since they are pure profit -- UBI covers your cost of living. On the other hand wages can be very low since they are gravy, still letting the fat cats make obscene profits, and since it is an employer's market they can exploit workers with long hours and mistreatment. After all, there is a long line of others willing to endure the abuse in exchange for an extra buck or two.
This looks very dystopian no matter how I slice it.
You don't think if you put a fully sedated and unconscious male model in front of 10,000 intoxicated young women, some of them won't molest him? Drunk women can be worse than drunk men.
That is why the web (as we know it) will die. It is a visual medium being consumed by devices that are too small to be visual, or are used aurally. Because let's face it, phones truly suck for web browsing. We're just unwittingly waiting for someone to come along the the disruptive technology that will replace it.
Its not surprising, as the signal to noise ratio is very low, and only a professional watchdog can begin to sort it all out. And even that doesn't help because there are also liars posing as watchdogs.
The internet only makes it worse, spewing like a fire hose.
Sure bring on the competition, it will be a good for Steam. I'd prefer a third party but we all know by now that capitalism devolves to a dual monopoly. Facebook will be the Microsoft of the online gaming world, and Steam will be the Apple.
But, I need to log into Facebook to play a game? They already want me to log in to post comments on news articles, to participate in the local railroad club or RPG community, or increasingly to gain access to assorted websites. They want Facebook to be the "universal login to the internet." I can swallow logging into Steam, because they don't have their slimy tentacles connected to everything else.
So nope, I won't play. Gaming is not that important to me, and I certainly don't need TWO Steams eating my hard disk and chugging CPU cycles.
Google is intrusive enough but somehow they don't feel as skanky as Facebook. Google is an over-eager octopus, but Facebook crosses the line into hentai. In theory they are the same thing and I should be equally concerned with both, but they sure don't feel the same. Maybe it's Zuckerberg's smarmy grin.
So Verizon is basically saying they are unable to provide adequate service unless they kick off some users. They should lower their prices then. In the last couple of years the quality of my Verizon services has gotten noticeably worse. Dead zones, slow response (should it take 24 hours for an SMS to be delivered to someone 10 ft away?), etc. I have actually wondered if they are removing cell towers in the area because coverage is so spotty, where before it seemed excellent. Verizon used to be good but they are turning into a third-rate provider. I'm considering cancelling my mobile altogether since U.S. technology companies seem unable to provide the service they charge me so much money for. As a benefit I would no longer have a phone number so so more cold calls. Ugh.
Well, that didn't take long. The concept strikes me as gimmicky, like google glass. I like the idea of a programmable watch that you can customize the functions on, but one can't expect much from it, and it shouldn't cost much. I don't wear a watch, and if I did there is very little you could put into one that would interest me. Even a basic calculator was never particularly practical, as the form factor is just too small.
Here's an idea: just build in a dumb flash drive, accessible via bluetooth. That would be useful. No wifi, no mobile, no messaging, no voice, no camera. Just a flash drive that is always with me. The tiny form factor wouldn't matter, because it works like a personal cloud device, and you don't interact with it physically.
Yep, if your pants are tight, switching to Windows is a great way to shrink whatever may be causing the problem. Didn't know it also caused baldness though.
The US government is no different. They already do this, and for the same purpose, only they hide their actions and dissemble about the purpose.
What is a terrorist but a political dissenter who turned to violence? And in the current US political climate, all dissenters are suspected to be potential terrorists, and since the goal is to eliminate terrorists before they actually commit a crime, the actual (unstated) goal is to eliminate dissenters.
Slashdot Mirror
Wait, it's run by Jews?
Then less than 20% of the country supported Hillary too. Current estimate is that the popular vote is within ~200,000 votes nationwide.
It would just be another popularity contest and a target for astroturfing. In the end it would be no more accurate than the stories it purports to fact-check. Can you imagine the cottage industry it would spawn? For only $9.95 we guarantee to increase the fact-rating rating of your page by 100%! Or we can reduce the rating of any page of your choice! Fact-checking is just a method of manipulation. It lulls the unwary into not thinking for themselves, and it insults everyone's intelligence. We need less punditry, not more. If anyone does implement this, I hope they also add a button to disable or hide it, because it would be very annoying.
Spider-pig does whatever a spider-pig does
STOP it? Obama promised transparency, which (in hindsight) it turns out means transparency of our formerly-private communications... not of the government.
Who owns the restaurant? Do they work for free too? Seems like a scheme for the rich "haves" to employ an unlimited pool of poor "have-nots" for free, allowing them to get richer while the poor stay poor on a fixed income.
What is going to entice those restaurant workers to actually work? If they can get their UBI check only in exchange for work, then it's not UBI, it's communism: everyone works for the government and the government contracts out its workforce to capitalist owners, or assigns them as desired. But that can't be, as the whole premise of UBI is that there are not enough jobs to go around; the purpose of UBI is to provide for those that cannot work. So work becomes voluntary as people compete for the privilege of working. But who is going to volunteer to do the dirty jobs?
Seems like you want UBI + wages. You get your UBI automatically just because you're alive, but workers still get paid wages. Get fired, no wages. That incentivizes work, spreads the wealth out from the owners who don't get to just keep all the profits for free, while still supporting those who are unable to work. Only the best will be employed, and wages will mean more since they are pure profit -- UBI covers your cost of living. On the other hand wages can be very low since they are gravy, still letting the fat cats make obscene profits, and since it is an employer's market they can exploit workers with long hours and mistreatment. After all, there is a long line of others willing to endure the abuse in exchange for an extra buck or two.
This looks very dystopian no matter how I slice it.
If you have to be told you're getting fucked, then you're not getting fucked.
Japan
You don't think if you put a fully sedated and unconscious male model in front of 10,000 intoxicated young women, some of them won't molest him? Drunk women can be worse than drunk men.
So this is what the former Google Fiber staff was assigned to develop...
That is why the web (as we know it) will die. It is a visual medium being consumed by devices that are too small to be visual, or are used aurally. Because let's face it, phones truly suck for web browsing. We're just unwittingly waiting for someone to come along the the disruptive technology that will replace it.
Its not surprising, as the signal to noise ratio is very low, and only a professional watchdog can begin to sort it all out. And even that doesn't help because there are also liars posing as watchdogs.
The internet only makes it worse, spewing like a fire hose.
Sure bring on the competition, it will be a good for Steam. I'd prefer a third party but we all know by now that capitalism devolves to a dual monopoly. Facebook will be the Microsoft of the online gaming world, and Steam will be the Apple.
But, I need to log into Facebook to play a game? They already want me to log in to post comments on news articles, to participate in the local railroad club or RPG community, or increasingly to gain access to assorted websites. They want Facebook to be the "universal login to the internet." I can swallow logging into Steam, because they don't have their slimy tentacles connected to everything else.
So nope, I won't play. Gaming is not that important to me, and I certainly don't need TWO Steams eating my hard disk and chugging CPU cycles.
Google is intrusive enough but somehow they don't feel as skanky as Facebook. Google is an over-eager octopus, but Facebook crosses the line into hentai. In theory they are the same thing and I should be equally concerned with both, but they sure don't feel the same. Maybe it's Zuckerberg's smarmy grin.
What a surprise, since we've been outsourcing our software engineering work to both those nations.
We need a campaign to replace the apple emoji. Someone could choke an an apple. Also apple cider contributes to alcoholism.
Plastic foam is insensitive to the environment. Maybe a spit-wad blowgun would be better.
Your lungs emit toxic vapors. And contribute to global warming too!
Does slashdot even give out mod points anymore?
So Verizon is basically saying they are unable to provide adequate service unless they kick off some users. They should lower their prices then. In the last couple of years the quality of my Verizon services has gotten noticeably worse. Dead zones, slow response (should it take 24 hours for an SMS to be delivered to someone 10 ft away?), etc. I have actually wondered if they are removing cell towers in the area because coverage is so spotty, where before it seemed excellent. Verizon used to be good but they are turning into a third-rate provider. I'm considering cancelling my mobile altogether since U.S. technology companies seem unable to provide the service they charge me so much money for. As a benefit I would no longer have a phone number so so more cold calls. Ugh.
Well, that didn't take long. The concept strikes me as gimmicky, like google glass. I like the idea of a programmable watch that you can customize the functions on, but one can't expect much from it, and it shouldn't cost much. I don't wear a watch, and if I did there is very little you could put into one that would interest me. Even a basic calculator was never particularly practical, as the form factor is just too small. Here's an idea: just build in a dumb flash drive, accessible via bluetooth. That would be useful. No wifi, no mobile, no messaging, no voice, no camera. Just a flash drive that is always with me. The tiny form factor wouldn't matter, because it works like a personal cloud device, and you don't interact with it physically.
Yep, if your pants are tight, switching to Windows is a great way to shrink whatever may be causing the problem. Didn't know it also caused baldness though.
Good answer
So you're not voting anymore?
The US government is no different. They already do this, and for the same purpose, only they hide their actions and dissemble about the purpose.
What is a terrorist but a political dissenter who turned to violence? And in the current US political climate, all dissenters are suspected to be potential terrorists, and since the goal is to eliminate terrorists before they actually commit a crime, the actual (unstated) goal is to eliminate dissenters.
will know what to look for to discern whether the FBI is conducting surveillance in a particular location
That's easy:THEY ARE.