Well for starters, I'm not anti government at all, I'm generally left wing. I have no clue as to how you got to that rediculous conclusion but clearly you're the "nut" on that point.
Furthermore, if the literal deffinition of the word doesnt match what you're saying what should logically infer about what you are saying?
Clearly you cant read. I have no desire to waste my time picking apart your obnoxiously long post so I'll just ask you to please reread the deffinition, it makes no reference to protection from government. Just because our country's constitional rights were framed in that context does not make your ideological spin on that word correct.
Quite a lot of solar adoption is driven not by a commitment to fighting global warming or pollution in general but by savings. Make the panels more expensive and adoption rates will drop significantly.
All I'm getting at is that Jar-jar and the prequels in general are for children at best. Jar-jar is the kind of stupid most normal people go back to in their adult years and flinch at in a fond childhood memory ruined by the reality of the movie. Even George Lucas uses the "it's for children" excuse for his garbage.
I feel completely comfortable telling someone who finds the prequels entertaining that they have poor taste.
“By living wages, I mean more than a bare subsistence level — I mean the wages of a decent living.” (1933, Statement on National Industrial Recovery Act)"
“No business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country.”
It's awesome you want to believe a conservative myth but the reality is different.
Well let me put it this way, I've never even heard of bad experiences like the ones I've described above being had from taxi drivers in my local area yet those were problems with uber drivers. Everything you said is great but it certainly doesnt match up with my experiences. I've never had a homeless person or blatantly reckless driver pick me up from any of the nearby cab companies.
Is it better though? I just recently had a guy on a long Uber run who wanted to watch videos on his phone while driving and was driving dangerously as a result and we had to ask him to stop. My Aunt and Uncle on their first ever Uber run this summer where picked up by what was clearly a homeless person. They felt sorry for her and so took the ride but it was not a comfortable experience.
Cabbies aren't perfect but some types of shit I've seen out of some uber drivers I have never seen out of a cabby.
I hate to say it but so what? I tend to be on the left environmentally but that statistic is not compelling at all. Five thousand people out of the hundreds of millions in Europe die early deaths because of diesel emissions? Far more deaths can be attributed to all kinds of every day things then that.
I think significantly altering our atmosphere is a bad idea and I like clean air and all but that statistic isn't compelling in the least.
It's the same in America but like a people everywhere there are those who want to turn a singular negative experience with themselves nailed to a cross.
I literally adressed your point in my above post. Please reread.
Furthermore, if you cant defend that advertising claim I posted, word for word (which you made no attempt to do) then you're full of it. In very clear language they are telling customers that their product's water resistance makes it suitable for rigorouse excersise. If it breaks from sweat from "strenuous" excersising then it does not meet that claim.
You had some wiggle room for a while because we were talking conceptionally but you don't have a leg to stand on given their above posted advertising claims.
"Sweat and water resistance provides the necessary durability for strenuous workouts and weather."
If it doesnt last through a workout due to sweat it has failed to meet this advertising claim.
Furthermore, i doubt any of these people are dropping their device into a bucket of sweat. If it cant handle body sweat not only is it not fit to be worn working out it is most assuradly not water resistant by any standard i've ever heard. Shit, by the claim above it's clearly implied that this thing is supposed to last even in the rain.
Well for starters I'm sure you get ads in these videos to. I've never been to a news site that didnt run them with there news videos. It's literally why they do autoplay on their websites so you have to watch at least part of their ads.
After that, i generaly dont want the video version of the news as it takes longer to digest and i cant skip around to the parts I'm interested as easily.
No, you're using industry code words. Do i need to post the definition of "resistant" for you? The device is clearly being advertised as friendly to people excersising and if it fails in this capacity then they have a case for false advertising. End of story as there's no evidence so far the people pushing the lawsuit put their device through any type of unuasual use.
Jar Jar was the worst pandering to children I've scene in a long time in a movie. Even George Lucas when defending him clearly stated he was there for young children and not adults. Of course Star Wars fans then avidly pointed out that the original trilogy didn't need such blatant pandering which is exactly why it appealed to both adults and children when those movies came out.
Sorry but no, if it's resistant to sweat then it's resistant to sweat. Any reasonable person would assume that it applies to their own sweat levels, especially when paying a premium price as in this case.
Furthermore, you have no evidence that the complaints are coming from some sort of super sweating freak.
That sheet is great and all but how do we get it to be used on a large scale? We have a hard enough time getting people to believe that significantly altering our planet's atmosphere is a bad thing, how are we going to get people on board with this?
One sided news can be fake news. Take one of my favorites from years passed, Fox's "War and Christmas". Every year Fox would dig up any little story about some one being an ass hole about Christmas and would then declare that there was a liberal war on Christmas. I'm sure the stories were mostly true but as for the war? Pure fabrication.
Slashdot Mirror
Well for starters, I'm not anti government at all, I'm generally left wing. I have no clue as to how you got to that rediculous conclusion but clearly you're the "nut" on that point.
Furthermore, if the literal deffinition of the word doesnt match what you're saying what should logically infer about what you are saying?
Clearly you cant read. I have no desire to waste my time picking apart your obnoxiously long post so I'll just ask you to please reread the deffinition, it makes no reference to protection from government. Just because our country's constitional rights were framed in that context does not make your ideological spin on that word correct.
This sounds great until you think of the ramifications of more expensive solar panels
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
Quite a lot of solar adoption is driven not by a commitment to fighting global warming or pollution in general but by savings. Make the panels more expensive and adoption rates will drop significantly.
You are wrong obviously,
https://www.merriam-webster.co...
(see second definition)
"something to which one has a just claim: such as :the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled"
a
You're using a politically slanted version of the word which isn't accurate.
All I'm getting at is that Jar-jar and the prequels in general are for children at best. Jar-jar is the kind of stupid most normal people go back to in their adult years and flinch at in a fond childhood memory ruined by the reality of the movie. Even George Lucas uses the "it's for children" excuse for his garbage.
I feel completely comfortable telling someone who finds the prequels entertaining that they have poor taste.
"Minimum wage was not and is not intended to be a wage for four people."
Oh how poorly educated you are in regards to the history of the minimum wage.
https://takingnote.blogs.nytim...
Quotes from Roosevelt who was instrumental in the enacting of the minimum wage.
“By living wages, I mean more than a bare subsistence level — I mean the wages of a decent living.” (1933, Statement on National Industrial Recovery Act)"
“No business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country.”
It's awesome you want to believe a conservative myth but the reality is different.
Or maybe some one out there thinks eating plastic isn't desirable but still enjoys the conveniences of modern technology?
How absurd!
Well let me put it this way, I've never even heard of bad experiences like the ones I've described above being had from taxi drivers in my local area yet those were problems with uber drivers. Everything you said is great but it certainly doesnt match up with my experiences. I've never had a homeless person or blatantly reckless driver pick me up from any of the nearby cab companies.
Is it better though? I just recently had a guy on a long Uber run who wanted to watch videos on his phone while driving and was driving dangerously as a result and we had to ask him to stop. My Aunt and Uncle on their first ever Uber run this summer where picked up by what was clearly a homeless person. They felt sorry for her and so took the ride but it was not a comfortable experience.
Cabbies aren't perfect but some types of shit I've seen out of some uber drivers I have never seen out of a cabby.
I hate to say it but so what? I tend to be on the left environmentally but that statistic is not compelling at all. Five thousand people out of the hundreds of millions in Europe die early deaths because of diesel emissions? Far more deaths can be attributed to all kinds of every day things then that.
I think significantly altering our atmosphere is a bad idea and I like clean air and all but that statistic isn't compelling in the least.
It's the same in America but like a people everywhere there are those who want to turn a singular negative experience with themselves nailed to a cross.
"I had a bad experience with a taxi driver so all taxi drivers are bad!"
Plenty of bad experiences are had by people using Uber. It's great you have a singular story to demonize someone but that's all it is.
I literally adressed your point in my above post. Please reread.
Furthermore, if you cant defend that advertising claim I posted, word for word (which you made no attempt to do) then you're full of it. In very clear language they are telling customers that their product's water resistance makes it suitable for rigorouse excersise. If it breaks from sweat from "strenuous" excersising then it does not meet that claim.
You had some wiggle room for a while because we were talking conceptionally but you don't have a leg to stand on given their above posted advertising claims.
There are a few gums that are sweetened with Xylitol as well. Great for the teeth!
Jesus you're annoying. Does Apple pay you by the post? I've never met some one so anti consumer.
From their own website
https://www.apple.com/shop/pro...
"Sweat and water resistance provides the necessary durability for strenuous workouts and weather."
If it doesnt last through a workout due to sweat it has failed to meet this advertising claim.
Furthermore, i doubt any of these people are dropping their device into a bucket of sweat. If it cant handle body sweat not only is it not fit to be worn working out it is most assuradly not water resistant by any standard i've ever heard. Shit, by the claim above it's clearly implied that this thing is supposed to last even in the rain.
Well for starters I'm sure you get ads in these videos to. I've never been to a news site that didnt run them with there news videos. It's literally why they do autoplay on their websites so you have to watch at least part of their ads.
After that, i generaly dont want the video version of the news as it takes longer to digest and i cant skip around to the parts I'm interested as easily.
As stated in the title.
I respect the needs of websites that I views needs to make money but what a pain in my fucking ass.
No, you're using industry code words. Do i need to post the definition of "resistant" for you? The device is clearly being advertised as friendly to people excersising and if it fails in this capacity then they have a case for false advertising. End of story as there's no evidence so far the people pushing the lawsuit put their device through any type of unuasual use.
Sorry, mind controlling some one when you don't even know you can do that. I could debate everything else you've said but that alone is ridiculous.
Sorry, I don't say this often because I believe in different view points but you have poor taste.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Jar Jar was the worst pandering to children I've scene in a long time in a movie. Even George Lucas when defending him clearly stated he was there for young children and not adults. Of course Star Wars fans then avidly pointed out that the original trilogy didn't need such blatant pandering which is exactly why it appealed to both adults and children when those movies came out.
It is though, there was literally no liberal agenda against Christmas. They said there was. That is fake news.
Sorry but no, if it's resistant to sweat then it's resistant to sweat. Any reasonable person would assume that it applies to their own sweat levels, especially when paying a premium price as in this case.
Furthermore, you have no evidence that the complaints are coming from some sort of super sweating freak.
That sheet is great and all but how do we get it to be used on a large scale? We have a hard enough time getting people to believe that significantly altering our planet's atmosphere is a bad thing, how are we going to get people on board with this?
Correction "War on Christmas"
One sided news can be fake news. Take one of my favorites from years passed, Fox's "War and Christmas". Every year Fox would dig up any little story about some one being an ass hole about Christmas and would then declare that there was a liberal war on Christmas. I'm sure the stories were mostly true but as for the war? Pure fabrication.