You should look up 'X chromosome Mosaicism'. In female mammals, each cell deactivates one of the two X chromosomes. It basically happens randomly, so *any* female mammal is a mix of cells with about half having an active *maternal* X chromosome, and the others having an active paternal X chromosome.
Identical twins will have different patterns of X chromosome activation. This can be a completely visible difference, such as in tortiseshell or calico cats
That's just the one mechanism I know of off the top of my head that can cause differences in twins, no doubt there are others. Once you get into environmental causes, I'm sure that does nothing but expand the possibilities.
Don't be stupid. In all the reporting I've seen, the vast majority of 'guilty but really innocent' problems occur because either the defence is incompetent of the prosecution is behaving illegally. The jury decides on the evidence placed in front of them, not on some 'universal truth' that they don't have access to.
The Japanese reactors are over 40 years old. Comparing modern designs to that is like saying my 2008 Lexus will have the same kind of failure rates as a 1968 .
Are you sure you have all 128 available? Many laptops take their video RAM out of the stuff on the motherboard, you may have substantially less available to the OS that you think.
No vaccine is 100% effective. Some have failure rates as high as 10% or 15%. In those cases, the only thing protecting the 'vaccinated' person is herd immunity.
The reason neutrinos are hard to detect is because they don't react with anything. The sun is emitting billions of neutrinos *per second* *per square cm* (at the earth). You probably hadn't noticed.
No, but the math is done on cars bought per year, so the outlay is also per year. Just like the 200 deaths potentially saved.
Re:Such systems have been proposed before
on
The Zuckerberg Tax
·
· Score: 2
The term in Canada is 'deemed disposition'. On death, the ESTATE (NOT the inheritor) is required to pay taxes 'as if' the stock had been sold, i.e. on the capital gains up to the point of death. The inheritor starts at that price, and thus pays taxes on all capital gains since the first death once the item is sold.
This is modulo a few exemptions, for example I believe a house or small business worth less than 'x' is allow to pass without the estate paying taxes.
If locating a replacement for the HW RAID card is difficult, then software RAID may be preferable. Imagine having your card explode, then find out that nothing else in the universe will put your disks back together as a filesystem.
Think about things line Virtual Machine images - they could have a *lot* in common, but not everything. DeDupe gets useful once you can work at a sub-file level.
Some people (immune compromized) *can't* get vaccinated, so rely on the 'herd immunity'. Infants 'not yet vaccinated' rely on herd immunity. Also some people who do get immunized simply don't 'take', and thus are unknowingly still at risk.
The higher the number of non-immunized people, the higher the risk of collateral damage.
Most signal transmission schemes over power lines are completely defeated by transformers. The cost of updating every single transformer with a signal bypass likely is more than incorporating wireless into the meters.
Remember PEBKAC. Most secure OS in the world is *still* going to be vulnerable to HOT_THREESOME.EXE. Once the user has downloaded and run malware, you're going to need a way to clean it up.
Personally, I think MS should invent a way to punch people over the internet. Anti-virus reports a positive? BAM, right in the .
No. Thursday's drive was an 'incremental' backup *relative to the previous thursday*, i.e. it only copies that which has changed in the last week. Once done, the drive contains a complete backup.
The saddest thing is - the 'no right answer" questions are (in my mind) one of the *best* ways of evaluating a prospective hire if the interviewer then follows up with "Why did you do it that way?".
Rather than finding out if the hire can find the answer, I would want some insight into *how* the answer was achieved. Was it something they memorized? Did they evaluate trade-offs? Did the even *see* the trade-offs? Can they evaluate their own answer if (as happens in the real world!) new constraints are placed on the problem?
An 'inefficient' answer is *just fine* if the code wouldn't be used much, and better if it's more maintainable, for example.
...which works perfectly for a running computer program - it is an instance of the program that resides on the disk. More than one PDF - more than one instance running.
Slashdot Mirror
You should look up 'X chromosome Mosaicism'. In female mammals, each cell deactivates one of the two X chromosomes. It basically happens randomly, so *any* female mammal is a mix of cells with about half having an active *maternal* X chromosome, and the others having an active paternal X chromosome.
Identical twins will have different patterns of X chromosome activation. This can be a completely visible difference, such as in tortiseshell or calico cats
So, if any of the AD genes are on the X chromosome, they can be expressed *very* differently in otherwise identical twins.
http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/genetics/medgen/chromo/mosaics.html
That's just the one mechanism I know of off the top of my head that can cause differences in twins, no doubt there are others. Once you get into environmental causes, I'm sure that does nothing but expand the possibilities.
Don't be stupid. In all the reporting I've seen, the vast majority of 'guilty but really innocent' problems occur because either the defence is incompetent of the prosecution is behaving illegally. The jury decides on the evidence placed in front of them, not on some 'universal truth' that they don't have access to.
The other employees aren't armed.
The Japanese reactors are over 40 years old. Comparing modern designs to that is like saying my 2008 Lexus will have the same kind of failure rates as a 1968 .
The two are not even comparable.
Are you sure you have all 128 available? Many laptops take their video RAM out of the stuff on the motherboard, you may have substantially less available to the OS that you think.
No vaccine is 100% effective. Some have failure rates as high as 10% or 15%. In those cases, the only thing protecting the 'vaccinated' person is herd immunity.
The *particular* bacterium that causes pertussis is, in fact, hosted only in humans. It doesn't survive for any appreciable time outside its host.
For other deseases I'm sure your are right, just wanted to point out that for this one, it is eradicatable.
The reason neutrinos are hard to detect is because they don't react with anything. The sun is emitting billions of neutrinos *per second* *per square cm* (at the earth). You probably hadn't noticed.
No, but the math is done on cars bought per year, so the outlay is also per year. Just like the 200 deaths potentially saved.
The term in Canada is 'deemed disposition'. On death, the ESTATE (NOT the inheritor) is required to pay taxes 'as if' the stock had been sold, i.e. on the capital gains up to the point of death. The inheritor starts at that price, and thus pays taxes on all capital gains since the first death once the item is sold.
This is modulo a few exemptions, for example I believe a house or small business worth less than 'x' is allow to pass without the estate paying taxes.
As usual, 'Dilbert' seems apropos...
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1994-10-12/
Don't forget anywhere within 100 miles of an International airport!
If locating a replacement for the HW RAID card is difficult, then software RAID may be preferable. Imagine having your card explode, then find out that nothing else in the universe will put your disks back together as a filesystem.
Think about things line Virtual Machine images - they could have a *lot* in common, but not everything. DeDupe gets useful once you can work at a sub-file level.
It's not lens flare (at least not in the classic sense)- it's diffraction around the internal supports for the secondary mirror.
Here's one I've been using, it worked well for my purposes:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/debug/crash_report.aspx
Similar thing in US vs UK, saying you are 'sick' or 'ill'.
In the US these are usually the same thing, in UK 'sick' means you are going to throw up.
There are things he can't be *told*. Everyone knows that he already knows them, that's why he was hired!
Some people (immune compromized) *can't* get vaccinated, so rely on the 'herd immunity'. Infants 'not yet vaccinated' rely on herd immunity. Also some people who do get immunized simply don't 'take', and thus are unknowingly still at risk.
The higher the number of non-immunized people, the higher the risk of collateral damage.
Most signal transmission schemes over power lines are completely defeated by transformers. The cost of updating every single transformer with a signal bypass likely is more than incorporating wireless into the meters.
Remember PEBKAC. Most secure OS in the world is *still* going to be vulnerable to HOT_THREESOME.EXE. Once the user has downloaded and run malware, you're going to need a way to clean it up.
Personally, I think MS should invent a way to punch people over the internet. Anti-virus reports a positive? BAM, right in the .
No. Thursday's drive was an 'incremental' backup *relative to the previous thursday*, i.e. it only copies that which has changed in the last week. Once done, the drive contains a complete backup.
"Watch me not care."
BOOM
The saddest thing is - the 'no right answer" questions are (in my mind) one of the *best* ways of evaluating a prospective hire if the interviewer then follows up with "Why did you do it that way?".
Rather than finding out if the hire can find the answer, I would want some insight into *how* the answer was achieved. Was it something they memorized? Did they evaluate trade-offs? Did the even *see* the trade-offs? Can they evaluate their own answer if (as happens in the real world!) new constraints are placed on the problem?
An 'inefficient' answer is *just fine* if the code wouldn't be used much, and better if it's more maintainable, for example.
...which works perfectly for a running computer program - it is an instance of the program that resides on the disk. More than one PDF - more than one instance running.