What you just described is right there in the middle. I meant literally "no security" and "maximum security" and said a compromise would be best, and you go come back saying essentially the same thing - but you managed to say I was wrong at the same time.
But that's expensive!... also some of us hate going out and playing that whole game anyway. Just about the only chance I'm getting any is a coworker or someone knocking on my door... and I doubt the last one ever happens.
No, they speak Spanish with a Mexican accent, with some different idioms.
You take a person from Maine, Washington, Georgia, and Texas - they all speak English, though the same holds true there as it does between Spain and Mexico.
No, i was being lazy. I didn't want to be bothered spelling it out, but it looks like I have to. Look through the below, please add some extra points if you wish. From what I've quickly drawn up, both moderate solutions look best to me, and I lean towards #2. In all cases the two extremes are the worst, which means the 'best' answer must be a moderation (meaning, as I said, this is not a moderation fallacy).
Just because I didn't spell it out for you doesn't mean the supporting ideas don't exist.
Extreme 1: no security Pros: hassle approaching nil, best speed Cons: security approaching nil
Extreme 2: maximal security Pros: sense of security, actual security is furthest away from nil Cons: maximum hassle, worst speed
Moderation 1: lean to no security Pros: still fast, minimal hassle Cons: poor security (but still not as bad as Extreme 1)
Moderation 2: lean to maximal security Pros: Security is next-to-furthest away from nil (closes to extreme 2). Speed/hassle can be minimized Cons: Possible false sense of security. Speed/hassle can be significantly impacted.
Except this is NOT a moderation fallacy, because the compromise in the middle ground is actually correct. This is not a binary choice, and in fact both extremes have a rather large count of downsides. Maybe I'm not looking at it right / don't have the whole picture - but that's not true in the healthy middle ground here.
Slashdot Mirror
I find it silly that they would block off a huge host of seemingly random websites for "safety" reasons...
I don't. Whenever you see such a policy, it means that someone who doesn't know WTF they are talking about established the policy.
We may often disagree, but I have to agree with you here.
Fine. Again you argue for what I'm arguing for - moderation.
Just shut the hell up and accept that we are both saying the same damn thing.
Say what?
This is the argument of a stuck-up admin who runs a handful of machines.
Stick a zero or two on the number of machines you manage and see how your tune changes.
Ask and you shall receive: Statistics.
Recall that licenses expire after 10 years, so dead/uninterested people do fall out of the numbers with at most a 10 year latency.
What you just described is right there in the middle. I meant literally "no security" and "maximum security" and said a compromise would be best, and you go come back saying essentially the same thing - but you managed to say I was wrong at the same time.
Probably not.
Incidentally where I live is almost dead between the two places I've worked since moving here.
I'm looking to move again though. Too many low income neighbors, and the only practical path to work is a traffic nightmare.
But that's expensive! ... also some of us hate going out and playing that whole game anyway. Just about the only chance I'm getting any is a coworker or someone knocking on my door... and I doubt the last one ever happens.
What about the poor folks like me, having to pay $100 a week because we got one of the tiny non-phallus-enhancing ones?
It sucks for everyone.
On the bright side, my non-compensation helps me compensate. It's kind of a reverse psychology :P
No, they speak Spanish with a Mexican accent, with some different idioms.
You take a person from Maine, Washington, Georgia, and Texas - they all speak English, though the same holds true there as it does between Spain and Mexico.
So you're saying a contract can override a decision by a judge? That doesn't seem right.
1x -1 Troll combined with 2x +1 Underrated will result in a 2, Troll.
They used to counterfeit, then they took a dollar in the printer.
I mean, while we're at it with the shitty memes.
That's not as bad as people who think you can speak Mexican...
No, see he's resolving the symbolic link (puppet) to China. :P
Die in a fire.
That would be "Zìyóu!!!" ... at least, that's what Google says. I don't speak it :P
So you're implying that there are no refrigerators in the USA older than 50 years? Was there a Great Refrigerator Purge that I never heard of?
You're not omnipotent. Stop thinking you are.
No, i was being lazy. I didn't want to be bothered spelling it out, but it looks like I have to. Look through the below, please add some extra points if you wish. From what I've quickly drawn up, both moderate solutions look best to me, and I lean towards #2. In all cases the two extremes are the worst, which means the 'best' answer must be a moderation (meaning, as I said, this is not a moderation fallacy).
Just because I didn't spell it out for you doesn't mean the supporting ideas don't exist.
Extreme 1: no security
Pros: hassle approaching nil, best speed
Cons: security approaching nil
Extreme 2: maximal security
Pros: sense of security, actual security is furthest away from nil
Cons: maximum hassle, worst speed
Moderation 1: lean to no security
Pros: still fast, minimal hassle
Cons: poor security (but still not as bad as Extreme 1)
Moderation 2: lean to maximal security
Pros: Security is next-to-furthest away from nil (closes to extreme 2). Speed/hassle can be minimized
Cons: Possible false sense of security. Speed/hassle can be significantly impacted.
Except this is NOT a moderation fallacy, because the compromise in the middle ground is actually correct. This is not a binary choice, and in fact both extremes have a rather large count of downsides. Maybe I'm not looking at it right / don't have the whole picture - but that's not true in the healthy middle ground here.
Which has anything to do with however put that idiocy in the summary (eg a question the damn story linked to explicitly answers)?
Yes! Extremes are good!
No, no they aren't. What we have now is just as stupid as no screenings at all.
All I have to say is "you got me!"
Your 28? Well, you're 8 years past the point the article is talking about.